7 SUMMIT AVENUE - BUILDING INSPECTION 7 SUMMIT P�VENUE
N'
flll
No. 153L•2
HASTINGS, MN
LOS ANGELES-CHICAGO•LOGAN,OH
MCGREGOR.TX-LOCUST GROVE,GA
U.S.A.
■ J
RCG LLC
17 Ivaloo Street
Suite 100
To: Thomas St. Pierre Somerville, MA 02143
Re: 120 Washington T 617 625 8315
Date: Monday, October 16, 2006 F 617 625 8345
www.RCG-LLC.com
Dear Inspector St. Pierre,
I am writing to inform you that I am in receipt of your October 3`d letter regarding the
pumps in the rear of the 120 Washington building. The pumps are to be replaced, and this will
be completed within two weeks. This process has been longer than expected because the
manufacturer has had to refurbish the pumps completely. The garage door in the rear of the
building has also been sealed and locked as to ensure no animals or trespassers can enter the
building. If you have any other questions or concerns please feel free to contact me, I will be
your contact for any building maintenance. Thank you.
Sincerely,
Joe Killar
617-625-7786 Direct line
617-293-6783 Cellphone
3 �
6 -0(0
a building or structure required to install automatic sprinklers as a result of a violation of this paragraph shall
do so within 1 year of being cited for such violation, and shall be responsible for the full costs of installation.
Notwithstanding any general or special law to the contrary, any business owner cited for violating the
maximum capacity for his place of business shall be subject to a $10,000 fine for a first or second offense. A
third such offense shall result in the business owner losing his license to operate in the commonwealth, and all
food, entertainment and other licenses associated with his business. This paragraph shall be enforced by a duly
recognized inspector of buildings, building commissioner or local inspector of a city, town or district or other
duly recognized inspector as provided,in chapter 143, or any state official with concurrent jurisdiction.
This section shall not apply to a place of assembly within a building, structure or portions thereof used
principally as a house of worship, restaurant, lecture hall, auditorium,state or local government building,
educational function facility, or other similar place of assembly. Temporary use of such a building or structure
or portions thereof as a nightclub, dance hail, discotheque, bar or for similar entertainment purposes, may be
allowed if a permit is issued for such use by the head of the fire department in consultation with the local
building inspector who may set the terms and conditions to protect against fire and preserve public safety.
Whoever is aggrieved by an interpretation, order, requirement or direction of the head of the fire department
under this section, or, whoever is aggrieved by a failure of the head of the fire department to take action under
this section, may, within 45 days after the service of notice of such interpretation, order, requirement or
direction, or after 45 days of such failure to act, appeal from such interpretation,,order, requirement, direction
or failure to act to the automatic sprinkler appeals board as provided in section 201 of chapter 6.
The cost of installing an adequate system of automatic sprinklers pursuant to this section shall be borne in its
entirety by the owner of the building or structure.
Except as provided in the third paragraph, the head of the fire department shall enforce this section.
Section 26H. Lodging or Boarding Houses; Automatic Sprinkler Systems.
In any city or town which accepts the provisions of this section, every lodging house or boarding house shall
be protected throughout with an adequate system of automatic sprinklers in accordance with the provisions of
the state building code. No such sprinkler system,shall be required unless sufficient water and water pressure
exists. In such buildings or in certain areas of such buildings, where the discharge of water would be an actual
danger in the event of a fire, the head of the fire department shall permit the installation of such other fire
�gsuppressant systems as are prescribed by the state building code in lieu of automatic sprinklers. The head of the
fire department shall enforce the provisions of this section.
31
For the purposes of this section "lodging house" or "boarding house" shall mean a house where lodgings are
let to six or more persons not within the second degree of kindred to the person conducting it, but shall not
include fraternity houses or dormitories, rest homes or group residences licensed or regulated by agencies of
commonwealth.
Any lodging or boarding house subject to the provisions of this section shall be equipped with automatic
sprinklers within five years after acceptance of this act by a city or town.
Whoever is aggrieved by the head of the fire department's interpretation, order, requirement or direction
under the provisions of this section, may within forty-five days after the service of notice thereof, appeal from
such interpretation, order or requirement to the board of appeals of the fire safety commission as provided in
section two hundred and one of chapter six.
Section 26I. Automatic Sprinkler Systems in New or Rehabilitated Multiple Dwelling Units.
In a city, town or district which accepts the provisions of this section, any building hereafter constructed or
hereafter substantially rehabilitated so as to constitute the equivalent of new construction and occupied in
whole or in part for residential purposes and containing not less than four dwelling units including, but not
limited to, lodging houses, boarding houses, fraternity houses, dormitories, apartments, townhouses,
condominiums, hotels, motels and group residences, shall be equipped with an approved system of automatic
sprinklers in accordance with the provisions of the state building code. In the event that adequate water supply
is not available, the head of the fire department shall permit the installation of such other fire suppressant
systems as are prescribed by the state building code in lieu of automatic sprinklers. Owners of buildings with
approved and properly maintained installations may be eligible for a rate reduction on fire insurance.
Section 27. Penalty for Failure to Comply With Order of Marshal.
Any owner of a building who, within six months after having received an order from the marshal under
section twenty-six, fails to comply with the requirement of such order shall be punished by a fine of not more
than one thousand dollars.
Section 27A. Shut off,Disconnection, Obstruction, Removal or Destruction of Fire Protection Devices;
Permit; Report; Violation of Statute; Enforcement.
Except as hereinafter provided, no person shall shut off, disconnect, obstruct, remove or destroy, or cause o
permit to be shut off, disconnected, obstructed, removed or destroyed, any part of any sprinkler system, water
32
THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS -
City of Salem
BUILDING INSPECTOR
Establishment Name Date
Address Page_of
In the space below describe all violations.
Time to A(n) inspection of this establishment was conducted in accordance with
Complete Massachusetts State Building Code 780 CMR.The following violations were observed:
Discussion with Management/Owner
I have read this report,have had the opportunity to ask questions and agree to correct all violations before the next inspection,to
observe all conditions as described.I understand that noncompliance may result in daily fines and/or legal action being taken against
you in Salem District Court.
Sign: Date:
..4.`I'i[.,r.,.n.y,_.iw-..-.G.r.. ..xs•..i.....,y . .. . . .. ..y,•�.� .s1',�'yt5�}.,Rt,•e,,,a,:�1H+'+VN.ea,+.ir'4 ..-v � . - �n,Y^. , .
THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
City of Salem
BUILDING INSPECTOR
Establishment Name Date
Address Page_of
In the space below describe all violations.
Time to A(n) inspection of this establishment was conducted in accordance with
Complete Massachusetts State Building Code 780 CMR.The following violations were observed:
Discussion with Management/Owner
I have read this report,have had the opportunity to ask questions and agree to correct all violations before the next inspection,to
observe all conditions as described.I understand that noncompliance may result in daily fines and/or legal action being taken against
you in Salem District Court.
Sign: Date:
RF
•82 OCT 22 all :21
D22Ta L1I C'appPc`Ll
v
CIT r:C-I$Y00 r 1arc,
F, ON.OSI' IrHr. PETITION OF MARY E. JENNINGS P.EQUESTING
F AItIANCE FOR 7 SUMMIT AVENUE
A hearing on this petition was held on October 20, 1982, with the following Board
Members present: James Hacker, Chairman; Messrs. Piemonte, Hopper and Feeherry.
Notices of the hearing were sent to abutters and others and a notice of the
hearing was published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts
General Laws Chapter 401A .
The Petitioner has requested a variance for the property at 7 Summit Avenue to
convert the existing two-family dwelling at the site to a three-family. A variance
is required because the proposed conversion is not permitted in an R-1 zone where the
property is located. (See prior decision of this Board) .
The Board of Appeal, after consideration of the evidence presented at the public
hearing and after viewing the property makes the following findings of fact:
1) Petitioner's proposed conversion of the property into a three-family dwelling was
unanimously opposed by all abutters.
2) Petitioner's proposed conversion will have an adverse impact on parking problems
in the area because the site has inadequate off-street parking.
3) The property has been in violation of existing zoning for a substantial period
of time.:
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and the evidence presented at the public
hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes.as follows:
1) The property in question is not in any wav unique. Rather, it is a type of
structure which is found throughout the surrounding area.
2) Petitioner failed to establish any conditions which affect the property in
question, but not the zoning district generally.
3) The Petitioner failed to establish a hardship as required by Chapter 40A to
support a variance.
4) The desired variance may not be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good. More specifically, the grant of the special permit would be contrary
to the single-family residential character of the area.
Therefore, the Board of Appeal unanimously voted in opposition to granting the requested
relief. The Board unanimously denied a variance to the Petitione .
App_ - r^,!' t -
CF: .
a = n rr. S! s t e= 7 p,;q ; ;, .,? ?o , c?n'I n c- atk}cjny M. Fee erry, S dietary
A �•OPY OF, THIS .DECISION. AND PLANS HAVE BEEN 'F1T,ED ' F = �{E LAA IN BOARD tUD CITY CLERK
.'n °D.
G Ai;J .:L i.W L I _ Li ;rc `. .•••
c ,, HT ,TJ
iJU
( �' Pnttrb of �ppeztl
MINUTES - JUNE 10, 1981 - PAGE THREE
to go to the grandson, Mr. Raymond Pinault. Mr. Ware stated that a variance is
needed for adequate frontage and total area. He stated that he had brought it
before the Planning Board and they had no objections. Hearing closed.
Mr. Feeherry moved that the Board grant the variance for side yard for both
lots and for total area for both lots and other such variances as needed (to be
worked on by Mr. Feeherry) to make 2 conforming lots. The motion was seconded by
Mr. Luzinski. ROLL CALL IN FAVOR: Mr. Feeherry, Mr. Hacker, Mr. Hopper, and
Mr. Luzinski. GRANTED UNANIMOUSLY.
7 Wall Street - Lydia King
Petitioner is requesting a variance to convert the dwelling into a trio-family.
Mrs. Lydia King represented herself before the Board. She stated that she wanted
to remove the picture window and replace it with a door and a platform in another
section to make for two exits. There are 2 exits on the first floor. Mr. Feeherry
inquired about parking and a builder. Mrs. King stated that there was no problem
with parking since there is room for 3 cars in the front and 2 on the side. She
also stated that she had a builder. Mr. Burke stated that he was in favor. Mr.
McIntosh stated that there were many two families in the area. Hearing closed.
Discussion: Mr. Feeherry stated that this is the same problem. Mr. Luzinski
stated that it was a large house. Mr. Hopper asked if you can limit a variance.
Mr. Feeherry stated that you can't limit a variance due to sale,' but you can limit
by. putting restrictions on time. Mr. Luzinski stated that there were other two
family houses in the area. Mr. Feeherry felt it should be restricted to a length
of time for 3 years,-so as they can see the impact on the neighborhood and review
it. Mr. Hopper felt it should be 5 years.
Mr. Feeherry moved that the Board grant the variance upon the following condi-
tions: ' 1. all plans must be submitted to the Building Inspector and get the appro-
priate building permits; 2. comply with fire codes; 3. a five year variance for
use as a two-family; 4. maintain existing parking. Mr. Luzinski seconded the motion.
ROLL CALL IN FAVOR: Mr. Feeherry, Mr. Hacker, Mr. Hopper, and Mr. Luzinski.
GRANTED UNANIMOUSLY.
I ✓ 7 Summit Avenue - Mary Jennings
Petitioner is requesting a variance to add one electric meter and one gas meter
to adquately define three dwelling units which at present has two electrical and
two gas meters.
3 :C
(situ ofttlPm, ttsttrltu��#ts
m,
MINUTES - JUNE 10, 1981- PAGE FOUR
Mary Jennings. represented herself before the Board. She stated that she
wanted to add an electrical and gas meter. When she bought the house in 1977,
she bought it as a three family which is in conformity with the rest of the
neighborhood. She stated that in 1975 the owner got a special permit to make
a stairway. The owner did get a permit from the Building Inspector but did
not go before the Board of Appeal. Mr. John Hamilton stated that .he was in
favor and could not see how an additional gas or electric meter matters. Mr.
Donald Bixby of 6 Eden Street for 60 years, was in opposition of the petition.
He stated that in the notice it was to adequately define the dwelling, but
there was never a public hearing to make it'a .three apartment dwelling. Physically,
there are small rooms with the top floor only 2/3 of the length of the first
and second floors. There was never a rear exit. The third floor was used as
extra bedrooms. A couple of years ago for 6-12 months, there was a problem with
college students when the McGuire Boys owned it. They had 9 vehicles all over
everyone's lawns and garbage all over. Once the property was owner occupied,
everything was okay. Absentee landlords create a problem. He was concerned if
Ms. Jennings sells and gets an absentee landlord. Mr. Feeherry inquired what the,
use is now and. if there are any problems. Mr. Bixby stated that there was no
( problems now but maybe in the future. He stated that in: 1973 two families;
1974 two families; 1975 just one family; 1976 three families were living there.
He stated that in 1976 someone was living on the third floor but only 2 doorbells.
Mr. Bixby also stated that there is a 2 car garage with no cars in it. There is
a boat in it, own by a non-tenant who makes a lot of noise. He stated that there
was no rear exit. Yvonne Kulas stated that it was wrong for 20 years and was
opposed to it due to problems in the past. John Kulas lived at 9 Summit Avenue
for over 22 years and he was never asked if the dormer was okay. He stated that
it is a fire hazard and that the people at one time threw fire crackers from there.
Mrs. Cecelski stated that there was never a three-family and there was never a
variance. Mr. Craig stated that it is a two-family and has been used as a three-
family illegally for many years. He stated that he never heard of the change to
a three-family. Ms. Jennings stated that she has professional people living
there and that there are no problems. She stated that since the neighborhood is
composed of three-families why the opposition. Hearing closed.
Discussion: Mr. Feeherry stated that the house is a two-family, was��w9
family, and changed by no legal process. He stated that the third floor is UIWa
an t a one u ding Inspector, which means lose of an .
apartment. Ms. Jennings stated that Robert McGuire had 3 tenants and she got
a mortgage as a three-family. She stated that her Purchase and Sales Agreement
stated that it was a three-family. She inquired if she could withdraw. Mr. Feeherry
stated that she can't with raw without the permission of the Board, since the
hearing was advertised. He stated that absence of legal counsel causes a problem.
Mr. Hacker felt that she could come back once she worked it out with the neighbors.
( Ms. Jennings stated that if she can't use as three-family, she is stuck with extra
rooms. Mr. Feeherry felt the request for variance should be denied. He stated
that Mr. McIntosh must do something about the problem. He also stated that Ms.
Jennings s ould t aer gew e ;eT9 ors to al ow her to use it as a three-
family and limit it in some way as her legal counsel sees fit. Mr. Feeherry stated
. that she could come up before the Board for a request of a different variance.
(DU of a, )Rn5achuutts
� nurD of �}r}zPttl
A At°/gM1L C)„'
MINUTES - JUNE 102 1981 - PAGE FIVE
Mr. Luzinski moved that the Board deny the variance. Mr. Feeherry wanted to
add that the Board found that the bause=is a two-family, has been and never was a
three-family. Mr. Hacker seconded t e motion. NG TO DENY: Mr. Fee?R yam,
Mr. c er, r. Hopper, and Mr. Luzinski. UNANIMOUSLY DENIED.
The next meeting will be June 24, 1981. Meeting adjourned at 9:00 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
Clerk
l
z 1�
s. Pourh of Amg REC I
•5
. �j4t0:g1p4 V/ .. '
JUNE 10," 1981 '81 JUN 17 A10 :07
CITY CLE" 'S OFFICE
SALEM
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF MARY JENNINGS
REQUESTING A VARIANCE FOR 7 SUMMIT AVENUE
A hearing on this Petition was held on June 10, 1981 with the following
Board Members present: Douglas Hopper, Chairman, Messrs. Feeherry and Hacker and
Associate Member Lusinski. Notices of the hearing were sent to 'abutters and others
. and notices were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with
Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
The Petitioner has requested a variance to add a gas meter and an electric
meter "to adequately define three dwelling units" at the site. A variance is
required because the property is in an R-1 district where the use of the property
as a three-family dwelling is prohibited without a variance.
The Board of Appeals, after consideration of the evidence presented at the
public hearing and after viewing the property makes the following findings of £act:
The property in question is not a legal three-family dwelling. The evidence
presented to the Board, including several city directories and the testimony of
numerous neighbors who have lived in the area between ,twenty and forty years,
established that the non-conforming use of. this property is limited to its use as
a two-family dwelling.
On the basis of the above findings of fact and other evidence presented at
the public hearing, the Board of Appeals concludes as follows:
A. The Petitioner failed to establish circumstances relating to the land
or structure which affect the property in question but not the zoning district in
which the property is located.
B. The Petitioner failed to establish that a literal enforcement of the
provisions of the Salem Zoning Ordinance as applied to the property would involve
substantial hardship to the Petitioner.
C. The Petitioner failed to establish that the requested. variance could
be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying
or substantially derogating from the intent and purposes of the Salem Ordinance.
DECISION - JUNE 10, 1981 - MARY JENNINCS - PAGE WTO
JUN 17 A10 :07
CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
SALEM;
Therefore, the Board of Zoning Appeals unanimously voted in opposition
to the granting the requested relief. This Board denies the requested variance
to the Petitioner.
7
Z7AVnth-onyM. Fe&herry
- APPEAL FROF:1 THIS DECISION, IF MM SHALL DE MADE PURSUANT TO SECTION 17 OF THE MASS.
GMERAL U '1S, C:EI:'r;EF: 'J?, A}1D S!!AIL 5z FKEc) id!i}:Lit 2u DAYS ArTYR'Ti1: CATE Cr FlL(NG
OF TiFS GEt:!SMf: I.': THE OMA! E OF THE CITY CLEAR.
PSe;�t;4i TO -'i.ASS. ST, u,;:! ll. THE V,1,n-!A%r- N! -PFML FE .'.i1T
Gi:AYi ED HEn'ci.'7. :.'i,.;L NN Tii._ EFi' CT J Tit A COPY ::F in_--....,j;!. E2A...:..1 T"r C.-RT.
FICATI;R OF TH C "7 o_u;i 'i i!A :O '1""-1 A; flAt; " a
OR THAT. IF SJ-':t D.t: APrE t HAS C,2"! Th'AT IT
RECORDED It: 'E SOU EX n•gi3Y F Dc£uS A,U vEXEv v a :7 iliE tiA4iE OF THE OiiNER
THE SOUTH ESSEX Rc_l
OF RECORD. 0.1 IS RECORDED AND t.9"+ED ON THE OWNER'S CERTIFICATE OF TITLE.
BOARD OF APPEAL
A COPY OF THIS DECISION AND PLANS HAS.BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING 0$ARD AND THE CITY CLERK
a-` r
of ,jajem, �4Eassttrhus2jts
Public Propertg Departmnit
P1tnTYTI$ BPy2LrtI'.tPYTt
Richard T. McIntosh
One Salem Green August 28,1981
1' Salem, MA 01970
j
Mary E. Jennings
2 Marsh Avenue Re: 7 Summit Avenue
Beverly,Ma 01915
Dear Ms. Jennings:
Persuant to the City of Salem Zoning Ordinance Section IX,
enclosed, and in consequence of the Board of Appeal decision
June 10,1981, relating to the above referenced property, you are
hereby notified to cease and desist from using the 3rd Floor
illegal apartment immediately. _.
Failure to comply with the above, will result in this matter
being pursued through the District Court for whatever action they
may determine.
Very truly yours,
Richard T. McIntosh
Zoning Enforcement Officer
RTM:mo's
cc: Conncillor Robert LeBlanc,Jr
Donald Bixby
vHIC ya AJS} TO q_qmmit Ave . `
2V7487 Red v1ks.7; ~ '
. mmA Black m1=o .
69919 m_ mice \ ° <
3077 m» U;«n
8806t areen Toyota ~ -�
Iq!2; Yellow vel
R9 Black Volkswason.
8:m;473Q a Ge Mustang »
X064 blue/xbGeabw panitrum <
. 1
« . . : � . . . . . . . . . . .. . \\ :
. . . . . . p,7. .
Q.
1 89200 N.
28: PC.
22 :5 .
N
A LEAPS 4388 18 05/20/77 1405 EDT SAL/0528.
INVALID DATA LINE DESIGNATOR 89200N
Q.
13 :89200N.
28: PC.
22 :5.
N
Q.
6P9919 .
28: PC.
22 :5.
N
J
A 2RMV 4430 19 05/20/77 1408 EDT SAL/0528,
NO RESPONSE TO
I
^n
#
A LEAPS 4302 05/20/77 1400 EDT (GBC) .
$.2. LEAPS IS NOW IN SERVICE, OFF SINCE 05/20/77 1346 HOURS.
#
13 :2 E7487.
28: PC.
22 :5 .
#
A 2RMV 4332 17 05/20/77 1402 EDT SAL/0528.
STATUS ACTIVE EXP 07/78
REG 2E7487 HANSON KARLA A
12 WHEELOCK RD 'WORCESTER EFF 08/25/76
TITLE F841699 INS 602 FEE 14 00 WGT
VOLKS 1972 SEDAN NO Ill 2DR 4CL
RED TRANS 2 4 . PASS UID 1122097163 .
#
A 2RMV 4618 26 05/20/77 1424 EDT SAL/0528.
STATUS ACTIVE EXP 12/77
REG AA60642 PECKHAM BRUCE D
30 ARBELLA ST SALEM EFF 01/01/77
TITLE E109396 INS 009 FEE 20 00 WGT 04000
FORD 1963 ECONOL STA WGN NO E14 6DR 6CL
GREEN TRANS 2 5 PASS VID E14`TH438123
A 2RMV 4588 27 05/20/77 1424 EDT SAL/0528.
STATUS ACTIVE EXP 08/78
REG SE4739 DAW ROBERT K
PUTNAM RD HOLDEN EFF 09/01/76
TITLE A106099 INS 889 FEE 12 00 WGT
FORD 1968 MUSTAN HARD TP NO 01 2DR SCL
WHITE TRANS 1 5 PASS UID 8TOIC'176156 .
#
Q.
13 : N94594.
28: PC..
22 :5.
Q.
13: SE4738.
28: PC.
22 :5.
#
A 2RMV 4581 25 05/20/77 1421 EDT SAL/0528.
STATUS ACTIVE EXP 04/77
REG N94594 DAVIDSON WILLIAM C
35 PEARL ST GT BARRINGTON EFF 08/05/76
TITLE F301079 INS 602 FEE 3 00 WGT
VOLKS 1970 FASTBA SEDAN NO 21)R 4CL
GREEN TRANS 2 4 PASS VID 3102132048
STATUS INACTIVE EXP 04/75
REG N94594 DAVIDSON WILLIAM C
35PEARL ST GT BARRINGTON EFF 10/ 18/73
TITLE C115797C INS 602 FEE 3 00 WGT
VOLKS 1969 BEETLE SEDAN NO 1500 2DR 4CL
WHITE TRANS 2 4 PASS VID 119021154
STATUS INACTIVE EXP 04/77
REG N94594 DAVIDSON WILLIAM C
35 PEARL ST GT BARRINGTON EFF 05/01/75
TITLE E596172 INS 602 FEE 12 00 WGT
FORD 1968 MUSTAN HARD TP NO 2DR SCL
ELUE TRANS 1 5 PASS VID 8TOIJ153727
#
Q.
13 : AA60642.
28:CO.
22 :5.
#
( 4
A 2RMV 4485 21 05/20/77 1412 EDT SAL/0528.
STATUS ACTIVE EXP 09/78
REG 6P9919 CARLSON EDWARD J
11 POSNER CIR LUDLOW EFF 10/01 /76
TITLE D708360 INS 455 FEE 12 00 WGT
CHEVR 1969 CAPRIC SEDAN NO GDR 8CL
BLUE TRANS 1 6 PASS UID 166399J303427 .
A 2RMV 4492 22 05/20/77 1413 EDT SAL/0528.
STATUS ACTIVE EXP 07/78
REG 3E0717 CLEARY LAWRENCE T
53 . EUREKA ST WORCESTER EFF 08/31 /76
TITLE F331599 INS 009 FEE 14 00 WGT
FORD 1967 MUSTAN HARD TP NO 2DR 8CL
E.UE TRANS 1- 5 PASS VID 7TO2C274937 .
A 2RMV 4495 23 05/20/77 1413 EDT SAL/0528.
STATUS ACTIVE EXP 06/78
REG 98086L MALYNN THOMAS E.
4 NINETEENTH AVE HAVERHILL -EFF 07/01/76,
TITLE D302615 INS 544 FEE 12 00 WGT
TOYOT 1972 CORONA SEDAN NO RT95 2DR 4CL
EROWN TRANS 2 4 PASS VID RT95014061 .
A 2RMV 4497 24 05/20/77 1414 EDT SAL/0529-
Sr AT US
AL/0528.STATUS ACTIVE EXP 02/78
REG 19332N BRIGHT PATRICIA M
5 MUSEUM RD BEVERLY EFF 07/07/76
TITLE F831233L INS 474 FEE 3 00 WGT
CHEVR 1973 VEGA COUPE. NO 2DR 4CL
YELLOW TRANS 2 4 PASS VID 1V77B32143225
STATUS INACTIVE EXP 02/78
REG 19332N BRIGHT PATRICIA M
5 MUSEUM RD BEVERLY EFF 03/01/76
TITLE D125575 INS 474 FEE 12 00 WGT
FORD 1968 MUSTAN . HARD TP NO 01 2DR 8CL
BROWN TRANS 1 5 PASS VID STOIC119716 .
��s•.cQ ���r� BUILDING DEPT
DR. ISRAEL KAR LAN._ I ITEALTH CENTER ,
SEP I5 45 N� 76
-BOA I2�D)'OF�HFALT Ia
21
Jeer bh-Aveliu -0 RECEIdEO
ff
�m6fiu4�is 197 CITY OF SALEWI SASS.
YSCV£f9 ~,
r �
ISRAEL KAPLAN• M. D. JOHN J. TOOMEY, D. P. M.
JOSEPH R. RICHARD HEALTH AGENT
J. ROBERT SHAUGHNESSY. M. D. September 14, 1976 )617) 745-9000
ROBERT BLENKHORN
M. MARCIA COUNTIE, R. N.
MILDRED C. MOULTON, R. N,
EFFIE MAC DONALD
John B. Powers
Building Inspector
1 Salem Green
Salem, Massachusetts 01970
Dear Mr. Powers:
Mr. Donald Bixby of 6 Eden Street (Telephone P745-1005) makes several
complaints with regard to the use of the structure at 7 Summit Avenue,
as indicated below:
1. Students are living on the first, second and third floors of the
structure. Estimates are - up to 12 students are living there.
2. Student cars are causing a parking problem, not only by street
parking, but also parking on lawns.
3. Unsatisfactory disposal of rubbish.
(This complaint will be followed through �Z the Health .Department.)
4. Alterations to structure in providing a second means of exit from
the third floor were never completed.
The owner of this property is Ruth E. Corbett, 3 Colonial Court,
Marblehead, Massachusetts 01945
Very truly yours,
FOR THE BOARD OF HEALTH REPLY TO:
XTOOMEY, AM. COLIN E. CAMERON, R.S.
HEALTH AGENT SENIOR SANITARIAN
JJT/g
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF ESSEX
APPLICATION FOR A COMPLAINT OR WARRANT
COMPLAINANT City of Salem ADDRESS 1 Salem Green
ALLEGED DEFENDANT MARY E. JENNINGS ADDRESS 2 MARSH AVENUE
IIt House Contains More Tnnn One Family, Desiynntc Which APaitmenl) BEVERLY MA
DATE OF BIRTH
OFFENSE VIOLATION OF CITY ZONING ORDINANCE
(Give Chapter and Section of Sidlute. Ordinance or Regulation Violated)
DATE OF OFFENSE CONTINUING PLACE OF OFFENSE, 7 SUMMIT AVENUE
(Or if for Non-Support, Length of 1 ime Nu Support Had) SALEM,MA 01970
STATE IF DEFENDANT ARRESTED YES X NO DATE OF ARREST
WAS DEFENDANT BAILED —YES NO AMOUNT $
INFORMATION TO BE GIVEN ON MOTOR VEHICLE VIOLATIONS
LICENSE • ISSUED
REGISTRATION • _— ISSUED
OWNER
INFORMATION TO BE GIVEN ON JUVENILE COMPLAINTS
JUVENILE ADDRESS
AGE
FATHER - ADDRESS
MOTHER= ADDRESS
FACTS UPON WHICH YOU HELY FOR COMPLAINT TO ISSUE
Defendant has ignored official notice from. the Zoning Enforcement Officer
to cease and desist from using the illegal 3rd floor apartment
Dated August 28,1981 (copy enclosed)
Repeated complaints from the neighbors requires that this matter be resolved
by the Courts.
Cs
WITNESSES Richard T. McIntosh .� O
Zoning Enforcement Officer
City of Salem
DATE OF APPEARANCE IN COURT G ��
Q'ttU of ,63tt1Pm, c �s�ttrf;us�ft�
H yl Public Prupertg Pepariment
frtl�4oQ` ` uning l_ 1
artment
Richard T. McIute9h
One Salem Green August 28,1981
�- Salem, MA 01970
i'
Mary E. Jennings
2 Marsh Avenue Re: 7 Summit Avenue
Beverly,Ma 01915
Dear Ms. Jennings:
Persuant to the City of Salem Zoning Ordinance Section IX,
enclosed, and in consequence of the Board of Appeal decision
June 10,1981, relating to the above referenced property, you are
hereby notified to cease and desist from using the 3rd Floor
illegal apartment immediately.
Failure to comply with the above, will result in this matter
being pursued through the District Court for whatever action they
may determine.
Very truly yours,
Richard T. McIntosh
Zoning Enforcement Officer
RTM:mo's
cc: Conncillor Robert LeBlanc,Jr
Donald Bixby
August 24, 1981
Building Inspector
City of Salem
One Salem Green
Salem, Mass. 01970
RE: Property at 7 Summit Ave. owned by Mary Jennings
Dear Sir:
At a meeting of the Board of Appeal on June 10,
1981 a decision was arrived at that the above premises
has been and still is a two-family house, and has never
been changed by any legal process. Therefore, the third
floor is presently being illegally occupied by a rent-
paying tenant .
The resident abutters of the property located
at 7 Summit Avenue request that enforcement be initiated
herewith in notifying Mary Jennings to immediately ter-
minate the use of the third floor as a dwelling unit.
This decision and action should be duly recorded
with the property deed so that any subsequent purchaser
will be aware of this restriction.
Thank you for your co-operation in this matter.
ENCL:Minutes of Hearing
June 10, 1981 p ABUTTERS
Donald Bixby 6 Eden /St.
�
An)g ina Cecelski 6 Summit Ave.
G
ohne Kulae -9-Summit Ave.
Frederick Craig 11 sumVIt Ave.
*% �itt�tYt$ �P�JtET�S:tE2t�
411tv of
Richard T. McIntosh
One Salem Green
745-0213
October 20, 1982
Board of Appeal
City of Salem
RE: 7 Summit Avenue
Gentlemen:
The above referenced property has continually been in violation of
the Zoning Ordinance by being occupied by three (3) families. Repeated
orders to vacate one of the units has been ignored.
August 10 - looks like three (3) family
• August 20 - looks like three (3) family
August 25 - Attorney William Donaldson called to say that the
third floor has been vacated.
The two (2) car garage on the property is rented by a Floor
Cleaning Co. to store their supplies and equipment which is also a
violation of the Zoning Ordinance.
A prior decision of the Board of Appeals has determined that the
property is a two (2) family dwelling and that the third dwelling unit
is not allowed.
Very truly yours,
Richard T. McIntosh
Zoning Enforcement Officer
RTM:bms
•
1` tcijl �7 ficL� � 6�a
QUQ 3kIP!"G'
JUN IQ 35 ,$2
city o�c�lvl:o
SALE1,HASS.
June 24, 1982
Building Inspector
City of Salem
one Salem Green
Salem, Mass. .01,970
RE : Property at 7 Summit Ave . owned by Mary Jennings
Dear Sir :
I wish to call your attention to the present
situation at the above location. At the Board of Appeals
hearing on June 10, 1981 a decision was rendered that it
was and still is a two-family house and can be occupied
by no more than two families.
The owner has continued to have the house
occupied by three different families on three different
floors regardless of the above decision and the order to
cease and desist such a pvactice delivered to her by your
office on August 28, 1981 .
At two hearings at Salem District Court before
a Hearings Magistrate (Jan. 11 ,1982 and May 17, 1982) it
was again concluded that the owner was not to allow more
than two families to occupy the premises at any one time.
In direct violation of the above findings , the
owner has continuously allowed three families as tenants
on the three floors and has totally disregarded the Building
Inspector's orders to cease and desist such practice .
I
In view of the above , we request that your office ,
along with the City. Solicitor of the City of Salem, institute
immediate action to halt the illegal use of the property.
With their permission, I am acting as spokesman for
the other resident abutters and owners whose signed request
for immediate enforcement was delivered to you on Aug.24,1981 .
Angelina Cecelski Yvonne Kulas Frederick Craig
6 Summit Ave ,Salem 9 Summit Ave .Salem 11 Summit Ave .Salem
Very truly yours,
RECEIVED,
JUL 2' 19& i 6 Eden St. ,Salem
ROAR0 OF ASSESSORS
SALEM, MASS.
;6�'v
Zito-,
�z
lea"7442-'l 04-
c �
�:�.� .
.� �� ��
�����
��� ���
� �
�� �
VSNICUS; BELONGING, TO summit Ave.
2X7487 Red. Volkswagon A;:eelll /P — Wo
8920ON Black Falcon
6P9919 Blue Caprice Ldow C''orlr*e - 4*//,✓
3NC717 Blue Mustang �ci+wa*wao C�awery
88086L Green Toyota ✓
1933221 Yellow Vega
N94594 Black Volkswagon —
824738 Beige Mustang
60642 blue/white Chev. panel truck kp+*• ?.
Permission to
•.Cover must �._%
be obtained from BUILDING
INSPECTOR.
Application for Permit for Alterations, Repairs, & Demolitions
Location, Ownership, and DETAIL Must Be Correct y
Permits Must Be Obtained Before Beginning Work
Salem, Mass., ---- - ---- ------- -- ---------------- 19
To the INSPECTOR OF BUILDINGS:
The undersigned applies for a permit to _ _ ___ _ __ the following described building: __-__-____
Location 'F �J ---p---C'c�- --------------- --------------------------------------------------------- Ward --------------------
r- Name of owner __rt�.--- p c --------------- Name of occupant ----------------------------------------
Name
--_ - - ----_--_-__-__ _---_-Name of mechanic or Contractor _____ -Z - Name of architect ------------ ____ _
Number of Stories ____________________ Material of Roof-------------- ---------------; Material 'of Building _____ ------
ofBuilding ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------
Ist Floor ---- —------------------------- lst Floor ------------_--
2nd Floor _- f "------------------------------- 2nd Floor --------------
Existing use of Building 3rd Floor ---------------------------------------------- If vacant show Previous Use 3rd Floor--____________
4th Floor ------------------------------------------ -- 14th Floor
5th Floor p 15th Floor
1 st Floor --- - - ---------------------------------- ------------------
2ndFloor ----- ----------------------------------- -----------
Proposed use after Alterations 3rd Floor________0___ _________________________-.___ ------
4thFloor--- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---
SthFloor --------- ----------------------------------------------- ------ -------
Are 10 or more people employed? ---------------------t.�114-------- ---------------------------------- On What Floors? _-___ .
- ---------------
Will 50 or more people assemble? --------------------- _-_._________ ------------------------------ On What Floors? ------------
DETAIL OFPROPOSEDALTERATIONS, ETC.
- - Z - -------iz--- -- --- ----------- -- --
A';42;'X- - --------- � � ----
-------____------
__ _ _ -
-------------------------------------------
_.
Estimated Cost or Valuation of New Work --------------------------------------------------------
Note: Separate Permits required to occupy sidewalk or for Plumbing and Electrical Work.
IMPORTANT: Show Lot Plan on back of this application, drawn to scale, showing location of Present
Structure. (�
Signature of Owner or aC/�2 �` - ---------- ----- ` ` -------- -_ -_
Authorized Representative _. ------------------------------------------------- ---
Residence ------ -
No.----1 ---- --
PLAN OF LOT
Application for Permit for Additions,
Sho«ing Location of Present
Alterations, Repairs,
and Demolitions Structure and Addition
-----------------------------__CLASS BUILDING
LOCATION '
u
ad
a
w
---------- - --------- ------- Ward-------------------
ow
----- -------_ow
----------------------
Cost I k 2
CONDITIONS
e .
_ ri 1 -,-------- --- - -- -- ----
a
e--�- -- - --'�'------------------ - T
�. � --- ----------
w � y
' PE MIT RANTED
/3.. .�--------------------------------------
g�V� DING DEFT
SEr 15
. RECEVV60 tdASS•
ell, OF SA`EH[
September 14, 1976
Ruth E. Cobbett
3,Colonial Court
Marblehead, Massachusetts 01945
Dear Ms. Cobbett:
Complaints have been received and verified.that rubbish is being
disposed of in an-wunsatisfactory`mannar it your 7 Summit Avenue
propertyin the City of Salem. .:
Immediate corrective action is hereby;requested-on-the rubbish problem.
It hasbeen brought 'to oni .attention- that a large numbeinof people are
living in this structure, and we are concerned that there may be a
violation of Article Two,of the Sanitary`•Cods of the Commonwealth on
"Space and Use".
Please advise this'aepaztment on the number of people you have rented
to on each floor, and' also, is each apartment rented to one family?
An early'rsply will be appreciated.
Very truly yours,
FOR THE BOARD OF HEALTH REPLY TO:
JOHN J. TOOMEY, D.P.M. COLIN E. CAMERON; R.S. ;
HEALTH AGENT SENIOR SANITARIAN
JJT/g
' 4cc: John B. Powers, Building Inspector
I Salam Green, Salem, Mass. 01970
Certified Mail 4327279
/yv INSPECTOR'S DAILY ROUTE REPORT
�/ A Date //A//712—, Odometer Readings
�INSPECTOR I
Last Stop
Time of Leaving Office Office
The following is a correct listing of my inspection activities
for this day. Miles Driven
Permit, Enqu ip-' Type of
Stop Arrive Left Address Notice or int Inspec
Complaint or tion
Number Building
1 U"Yn X1-(V
2
3 A
4 c.,w
s V Cl
6 n.au e N
7 4'
B
9 TAi�
10 sn
11
12
13 =� �. G1tl r�,4
14
1s -
16
17 c
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
WORK DISTRIBUTION (KINDS OF INSPECTIONS)
PERMITS PERIODICAL 8 FEE REINSPECTION
COMPLAINTS NO ENTRY TOTAL
CHECKED BY DATE
SUPERVISOR