86 SUMMER STREET - BUILDING INSPECTION 86 Summer Street
CERTIFICATE ISSUED
DATE 12/30/91
CITY OF SALEM
SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 BUILDING PERMIT_ -
aD,m CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY
DATEm19 991 .. PERMIT NO. 365-91
APPLICANT JOAN PERRONI ADOREss 6 SUMMER ST. OWNER
INO.1 ISTR{ETI ICONI.'S LICENSEI
CONSTRUCT ADDITION DWELLING NUMBER OF I
PERMIT TO (_1 $TONY NUMBER
UNITS
(1..( Df.IY.RDY{M(MTI M0. IVPO.Of(D U![1
AT (loCaTlONI Bfi SUMIZA CT WARD ZONING
DISTRICT R2
INO.1 Il TR[[TI
BETWEEN AND
ICROSS ETREEII p !2.055 STREET)
LOT
SUBDIVISION LOT BLOCK SIZE
BUILDING IS TO BE Fl. WIDE P, FT. LONG BYFT. IN HEIGHT AND SMALL CONFORM IN CON57PUCTION
i
TO TYPE 'USE GROUP BASEMENT WALLS OR FOUNDATION
ITTP[I
REMARKS!
CONSTRUCT 121 X ISI ADDITION
rl �.
**_CALL FOR PERMIT TO OCCUPY
AREA OR
VOLUME
C AIC,sow.RE fttTl
JOAN PERRONI swlswlslwd...vw.srrld...sr(Ibealsxnvwldwlde[Isa�Esw.srrne
OWNER TO BE POSTED ON PREMISES
ADDRESS 3 ROOSEVELT RD. SEE REVERS SIDE FOR CONOITI NS OF CERTIFICATE
Ctg of ttlem, 'T- assadtusetts
s ;
.r F 'gnnra of Au
peaIJUL 3 2 19
CITY CF : aSS
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF JOHN PERRONI, TR. FOR A SPECIAL
PERMIT AT�86 SUMMER ST--'(R-2)
A hearing on this petition was held June 26, 1991 with the following Board Members
present: Richard Bencal, Chairman; Richard Febonio, Edward Luzinski, Mary Jane
Stirgwolt and Associate Member Ronald Plante. Notice of the hearing was sent to
abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the
Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioner, owner of the property, is requesting a Special Permit to allow
construction of an addition in this R-2 district.
The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this request
for a Special Permit is Section V B 10, which is provides as follows:
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the Board of
Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set for in Section VIII
F and IX D, grant Special Permits for alterations and reconstruction of nonconforming
structures, and for changes, enlargement, extension, or expansion on nonconforming
lots, land, structures, and uses, provided, however, that such change, extension,
enlargement or expansion shall not be substantially more detrimental than the
existing nonconforming use to the neighborhood.
In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit requests,
guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted upon a finding
by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will promote the public health,
safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the
hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact:
1 . The proposed addition will provide ground level living quarters for the
present occupants who have lived in the house for over fifty (50) years.
2. The proposed addition will contain a bedroom and bath only, not an additional
and separate dwelling unit.
3. Several neighbors spoke in favor of this petition.
4. One abutter spoke in opposition to the petition citing reduced sunlight
on this back porch due to the height of the proposed addition.
5. The petitioner expressed willingness to adjust the proposed roof pitch
to ameliorate the adverse impact of the addition on the abutters porch.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the
hearing the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1 . The granting of the Special Permit requested will promote the public health,
safety convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants and will be in h,
harmony with the neighborhood.
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF JOHN PERRONI, TR. FOR A SPECIAL
PERMIT AT 86 SUMMER ST. , SALEM
page two
2. The Special Permit requested can be granted without substantial detriment
to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the Special
Permit requested, subject to the following conditions:
1 . All construction be in compliance with city and state building codes.
2. All construction be as per the plans and dimensions submitted and amended with
the roof pitch lowered to 6 to 12.
3. A building permit be obtained.
4. A certificate of occupancy be obtained.
5. Exterior finishes of the proposed addition be in harmony with the existing
structure.
6. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire
safety be strictly adhered to.
Special Permit granted
June 26, 1991 J^
Cts""✓)
Mary J$n01St1rgwoit, 7mber, Board of Appeal
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK
to
11
Appeal from this decision,If any,shall be mad6 pursuant to Section 37 01
2�j the Mass. Ganeral Laws,Chapter 808, and shall be filed within 20 days
after the datesof filing of this decision In the office of the City Clerk.
Pursuant to Mass. General Laws,Chapter 808,Section 11, the Variance
r` or Apecial Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the
decision, bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have
elapses' and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been
filed, that it frac been dismissed or denied is recorded In the South Essex
Registry of 0ee h, aM Indexed under the name or the owner of record or
Is recorded and eo•v, a tha owner's Certificate of TRIa.
Pt-.)AP- OF PPP-AL
(fity of _"�ulem, �fasearllusetts
'J. r R E f,I•.�lrl �_k
Pourb of Aupenl
'91 APR -3 P3 :08
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF JOHN PERRONI, TRUSTEE FOR QdT,' Pft 'S OFFICE
PERMIT Af 86SUMMER ST'S-2) SALL '
A hearing on this petition was held February 27, 1991 and continued until March
20, 1991 with the following Board Members present: Richard Bencal, Chairman;
Joseph Correnti, Mary Jane Stirgwolt and Associate Member LaBrecque. Notice of
the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were
properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts
General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioner, representing himself, requested leave to withdraw this petition for
an addition. A motion to allow withdrawal having been made and duly seconded,
the Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 4-0, to grant the request.
WITHDRAWN WITHOUT PREJUDICE
-Richard A. Benca , Chairman
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK