5 STODDER PLACE - BUILDING INSPECTION 5 Stodder Place
4
v u -J
Plans must be Sled and approved by the Inspector before a permit will be granted.
n, - L
No. / City of Salem Ward b -a
Is Property Located in the
Historical District? Yes_ NoX
' e Home Phone#
Is Property Located in a , ,I
Conservation Area? Yes_ No� Ja'�'cawKs.cd Bus.Phone# �JP/- �
APPLICATION
F -�
PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT00 ,/bECKS.AN SHEDS
Salem, Mass.,
TO THE INSPECTOR OF BUILDINGS:
The undersigned hereby applie�fo'r'a p`e_rmit to build according to the following specifications:
Owner's name and address ,gL)J�'Pq— I
Architect's name /I n+,14h
Mechanic's name and address
Location of building, No.
What is the purpose of building? �.T�s— r-0Q)e
Material of building? I-cJd e d
If a dwelling,for how many families?
Will the building cgnfor mO he requirements of the law?
Estimated cost 7 6 Contractors Lie. No.
Signature of applicant :Z?j A,),, +G10ir�Q�
Signed Under the Pe Ity of Perjury
s') REMARKS /;nn
d I4 • '�J�..rc - nooh c�e� U- Ju4 Q. 144izl-
0
j6 pq-,
No. / Ward
APPLICATION FOR
PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT
SWIMMING POOL
Location
PER^M I,TGRANTED
199
Appro ed
10
C ilding nspector
^\a j/,L'o�lq —
r
of Salem, 'Massarlluscite
i � 9
a POALa Of t�, peal
Fie o 3
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF KATHLEEN MCSWEENEY
FOR A VARIANCE AT, 9LSTODDER`PLACE (R-2)
A hearing on this petition was held January 19, 1994 with the following
Board Members present: Francis X. Grealish, Chairman; George Ahmed, Albert
Hill, Stephen Touchette and Stephen O'Grady. Notice of the hearing was
sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly
published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts
General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioner, owner of the property, is requesting Variances from rear & side
setbacks and distance from structure to allow existing pool, deck and shed
in this R-2 district.
The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding by this
Board that:
1. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the
land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting
other lands, buildings and structures involved.
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would
involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner.
3. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented
at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings
of fact:
1. Three abutters signed a petition in favor of this request.
2. The direct abutter, Helen Malia, wrote a letter in favor after the deck
was moved.
3. The deck, as relocated, is the only feasible location for the deck.
The shed as it stands is the only feasible location for it to be placed and
it satisfies the neighbors and abutters.
4. The granting of this variance allows petitioner a fuller use of her
property.
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF KATHLEEN MCSWEENY FOR A
VARIANCE AT 5 STODDER PLACE, SALEM
page two pp
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on 4 9vidl" " dJgnted
at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as foG11-gws:
1. Special conditions exist which especially affect the subjecd �property
but not the district in general.
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would
involve substantial hardship to the petitioner.
3. Desirable relief can be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the
variance requested, subject to the following conditions:
1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state Statutes, ordinances,
codes and regulations .
2. The proposed construction shall be done in strict accordance with the
plans and dimensions submitted.
3. Petitioner shall comply with all requirements of the Salem Fire
Department relative to smoke and fire safety.
4. Petitioner shall obtain a building permit from the City of Salem
Building Inspector prior to beginning any construction .
Variance Granted
January 19, 1994 „p
Stepn O'Grady, Member
Board of Appeal
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY
CLERK
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of
the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20
days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City
Clerk. Pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11, the
Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a
copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20
days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has
been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South
Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record
or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title.
Board of Appeal