4 SKERRY STREET COURT - BUILDING INSPECTION 4 SKERRY STREET COURT- r`
� J
FILE:/C:;. C:). COI='Y
��LUNIIIT� 0
CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY
CITY OF SALEM Issued. Permit N: °S'S
SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 City of Salem Building Dept.
INE DUN
DATE OC'TOSER I E 1997 PERMIT NO. 605—1.99 7
APPLICANT F2AFFA CC,NST R UC'7"ICiN AODREsshl�l H6dLE: S"f R1'_:ET q;j10
(NO.) (STREET)
(CONTR'S LICENSE)
CITY REcVL RL Y
STATE MA ZIP CODE 01 91`.i TEL.NO.
PERMITTO ALTERATION ) STORY TWO DR MDRE FAMILY NUMBEROF _
(TYPE OF IMPROVEMENT) NO. (PROPOSED USE) DWELLING UNITS
AT(LOCATION)Q01IL}ZI SE:ERRY S !'REI.T COUR"f ZONING
INO_I (STREET) DISTRICT R2
-
BETWEEN
(CROSS STREET) AND
(CROSS STREET)
SUBDIVISION MIF1F' 3ES LOT I�171 BLOCK S¢e Ili&D4319 SC? F'1'
BUILDING IS TO BE FT.WIDE BV FT.LONG BV FT.IN HEIGHT AND SHALL CONFORM IN CONSTRUCTION
TO TYPE USE GROUP BASEMENT WALLS OR FOUNDATION
(TYPE)
REMARKS: RENO VATI(-)Nc3 IDS GF= R 1: f"W'D X Sr—=S Sr—=SDATED FY 97
AREA OR
VOLUME ESTIMATED COST '1 7VI 711)171 PERMIT
@@
CuBIGSOUARE FEET) FEE $ 01 VI
OWNER MT MT RI AI TV l"Fdl l4"i'
ADDRESSE,(� RR'I Df'F ^;"rBUILDING DEPT,
BY K.G.G.
of �ttiem, CHttsstttliusetts
n
�Ruttra of '�Fveul
JJk z 1 40 Ph gI
CITY OF SALTY. MASS
DECISION OF THE PETITION OF DIANE S. OIBRIEN,,,TRUVILF�§Q9WFNG A
VARIANCE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT'4 SKERRY STREET COURT,(R-2)
A hearing on this petition was held July 16, 1997 with the following Board
members present: Gary Barrett; Chairman, Nina Cohen, Albert Hill, Joseph
Ywuc and Richard Dionne. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and
others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem
Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioner, requests a Variance from lot area, area per dwelling unit,
frontage, side yard and rear yard dimensional regulations in order to
renovate an existing carriage house for use as a two family dwelling on the
existing foundation and existing lot.
The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding of this
Board that:
1. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the
land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting
other land, buildings, or structures in the same district.
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would
involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner.
3. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogation from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
The Board of Appeal, after careful considerations the evidence presented at
the hearing, makes the following findings of fact:
1. The petitioner was represented by Attorney George Atkins, of 59 Federal
Street.
2. Petitioner is the owner of an "L" shaped lot in an- R-2 district that
has 50 feet of frontage on Skerry Street Court. On the lot is a very
old and dilapidated structure that was formerly used as a barn.
3. Four of the abutting homeowners submitted brief letters in support of
the proposed petition. These were: Susan J. Bishop, 3 Skerry St. Ct. ,
Raymond Hodge, 6 Skerry St, Victoria M. Tache, 62 Bridge St. and
Rosemary Lack of 70 Bridge Street.
4. There was no opposition to the proposed relief.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented
at the hearings, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
i. Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property
and not the district in general.
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would
involve substation hardship to the petitioner.
DECISION OF THE PETITION OF DIANE S. O'BRIEN, TRUSTEE REQUESTING A
VARIANCE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 4 SKERRY STREET COURT
page two
3. Desirable relief can be granted without substantial detriment to
public good and without nullifying and substantially derogating from
the intent of the district or purpose of the Ordinance.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented
at the hearing, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0 to grant
the variance requested, subject to the following conditions:
1 . Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statures, ordinances,
codes and regulations.
2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions
submitted and approved by the Building Inspector and to include Plan
A-3, dated July 16, 1997.
3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and
safety shall be strictly adhered to.
4 . Exterior finishes of the new construction shall be in harmony with the
existing structure.
5. Petitioner is to obtain a building permit prior to beginning any
construction.
6. A Certificate of Occupancy is to obtained.
7. Exterior finishes of the new construction shall be in harmony with
the existing structure.
Variance Granted
July 16, 1997 �ne%l Cv"u 'X CSc
Nina Cohen, Member
Board of Appeal
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY
CLERK
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of
the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20
days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City
Clerk. Pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11, the
Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a
copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20
days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has
been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South
Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record
or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title.
Board of Appeal
,MCONDIT
BOARD OF ASSESSORS
93 WASHINGTON STREET,CITY HALL, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970-3595
(508) 745-9595 Ext. 261
(508)744.2069 Fax
June 6, 1995
Deborah E. Burkinshaw
City Clerk
City Hall
Salem MA 01970
Dear Miss Burkinshaw:
Please be advised that the new single family house to be located on the right side of
Skerry Street Court on land owned by M J M J Realty Trust (Assessors Parcel #36-0171)
has been assigned the legal street address of 4 Skerry Street Court.
Ver truly o s,
6
e M. anon
Chairman.
cc: Postmaster Joseph L. Leccese
Chief Robert Turner, Fire Department
Helen Jiadosz, Water Dept.
Leo Tremblay, Inspector of Buildings
Capt. Paul Murphy. Police Dept.
Diane S. O'Brien, 64 Bridge Street
(Citu of Tatem, I ffiassarbusdis
MAY 9 IO 16 dp '9q
M -Safrin (6ran
FORM A - DECISION
Ms. Deborah Burkinshaw
City Clerk
Salem City Hall
Salem, MA 01970
Dear Ms . Burkinshaw:
At a regularly scheduled meeting of the Salem Planning Board
held on May 5, 1994 it was voted to endorse "Approval Under
Subdivision Control Law Not Required" on the following described
plan:
1 . Applicant :
Heritage Cooperative Bank
71 Washington Street
2 . I.ucation and Description :
64 Bridge Street & Skerry Street Court
A parcel of land with buildings thereon situated on 64 Bridge Street and containii
15,442 s.f. of land and a parcel of land with a building thereon situated on Sker;
Mraet Court and containing 4,009 s.f. of land and lying immediately adjacent to f
Deea � ffowy' records in Essex Soutn District Registry.
Sincerely,
W"-6. PM-Lcl:T-47/ems
Walter B. Power , III
Chairman
EX\DH\BPFORMA
,&,CONO,[� Civ Of aknt, �Eassar4ustfts �_ a
s i _
a �
(line iaiem (15rren c=;
DECISION OF THE PETITION OF HERITAGE CO-OPERATIVE
BANK FOR A WAIVER AT 64 BRIDGE STREET FOR LOT 4
A Public Hearing on this petition was held on April 7 , 1994 at
7 : 30 p.m. , with the following Board members present : Walter B.
Power , III , Chairman; Debbie Hilbert; Carter Vinson; Chuck Puleo;
John Moustakis; L. Lee Harrington and Gene Collins . Notice of this
Hearing was sent to abutters and notice of the Hearing was properly
published in the Salem Evening News .
Petitioner , owner of property, is requesting a waiver from
frontage requirements for lot 4 , which will front Skerry Street
Court , from the Subdivision Regulations under M.G.L. Chapter 41,
Section 81R. This section states that "A planning board may in any
particular case, where such action is in the public interest and
not inconsistent with the intent and purpose of the subdivision
control law, waive strict compliance with its rules and
regulations, and with the frontage or access requirements
specified in the law. . . "
The waiver for Lot 4 is being granted upon a finding by the
Board that :
1 . Special conditions and circumstances exist which
especially affect the land involved which are not
generally affecting other lands involved;
2 . Lot width is consistent with the surrounding
neighborhood lot widths; and
3 . The Planning Board determined that granting the
waiver is in the public interest and not inconsistent
with the intent and purpose of the subdivision control
law.
Therefore, the Planning Board voted by a vote of six ( 6 ) in
favor , one ( 1 ) opposed, to grant the waiver from frontage
requirements for Lot 4 .
WAIVER GRANTED
APRIL 7 , 1994
This endorsement shall not take effect until a copy of the
decision bearing certification of the City Clerk that twenty ( 20 )
days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed or that if such
appeal has been filed that is has been dismissed or denied, is
recorded in the Essex South District Registry of Deeds and is
indexed int he grantor index under the name of the owner of record
or is recorded and noted on the owner ' s certificate of title. The
fee for recording or registering shall be paid by owner or
applicant .
I hereby certify chat a copy of this decision and plans are on
file with the City Clerk and a copy is on file with the Planning
Board.
Sincerely,
Walter B. Power , III
Chairman
EX\PB\64FRONTW.VR