8 INTERVALE ROAD - URBANSKI, EDWARD & JUNE - ZBA 8 Intervale Road (R-1
Edward &June Urbanski
��..CON,"A..(Q.
r, (9jtg of 0rzlQxn, ��El�ss�zr�usEtts'
Pourb of Aypea . l .
A�O41sti N:� 1 .!
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF EDWARD AND JUNE T�URBANS FQR.,
A SPECIAL PERMIT FOR 8 INTERVALE ROAD, SALEM C!T "P` c, CGc«
A hearing of this petition was held on March 28, 1984 with the following Board
Members present: James Hacker, Chairman; Messrs., Hopper, Strout and Associate
Member Bencal: Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices
of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance
with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioners are requesting a special permit to extend nonconforming side setback
in order to construct a 32' x 14' enclosed, single story porch. Property is
located in an R-1 district.
The provisions of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this request.
for a Special permit is Section V B 10, which provides as follows:
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing
in this Ordinance, the Board of Appeal may, in
accordance with the procedure and conditions set
forth in Section VIII _F nad IX D, grant SpecialPermits
for alterations and recosntruction of nonconforming
structures, and for changes, enlargement, extension or
expansion of nonconforming lots, land, structures,
and uses, provided, however, that such change, extension, .
enlargement or expansion shall not be substantially more
d6trimental than the existing nonconforming use to the
neighborhood.
In more general terms; this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit requests,
guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted upon a finding
by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will promote the public health,
safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants.
The Board of Appeal, after consideration of the evidence presented at the
public hearing and after viewing the plans makes the, followingfindings of fact:
1 . No opposition to petitioner's plan was raised by neighbors.
On the basis of the above findings of fact and on the evidence -presented at the
public hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1 . The proposed construction of a 32' x 14' single story, enclosed porch
on the property will not be substantially more detrimental to the _
neighborhood than the existing side setback.
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF EDWARD & JUNE URBANSKI
FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT FOR 8 INTERVALE ROAD, SALEM
page two --
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously tq ggraar� the petitioner
the requested relief. The Board grants a Special Permit uflflerh �iel�fo]�0,IAfg
terms and conditions.
CITY C_cr
1 . Petitioner Petitioner may extend the nonconforming side setback�q?;constrnctiltg a
single story enclosed porch not to exceed 32' x 141 ;
2. Detailed plans to be submitted to the Inspector of Buildings:
SPECIAL PERMIT GRANTED
,6
aures B. Hacker, Chairman
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK .
APPEAL F'-"" THIS OECISia%, IF ANY, SHALL BE VA.DE PURSUANT TO SECTION 17 OF THE 6!ASS.
CHAPTER ECB, A`!7 SHALL 3E FILED SYTHIPI 20 GAYS I"-TE !R;
R THE GATE OF FlC
C Li�! THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK. - - -
P " CE�i=RPL LA::C, C":AP7FP EJ°, SECT!]N 1I, THE `s'•i%!A.':CE OZ SPECIAL PER?IIT
O ' HALL RCT T}::E EFFECT U. L A COPY OF TH CECLi;,C. B s.::10 ir'E CER
- "'F : CIF'! CLERf T:'SI ..^0 CAPS {:p!5 ELAPSED AND !sO AP.=EAL H:w' Bc'E7 BLED,
CR iH.`.f, iP :: ^.H ;;;I APPEAL HAS BEEN FILE THAT IT HAS SEEN DIS7i!3;EO CR CEtN:ED IS
P,ECCSS.O `:: Tr1E
35J-'H ESSEX REGISTRY CF "EEOS AND I :DEXED URCE2 THE !!A'
OF RECORD OR IS RECORDED AND NOTE-) ONThE OV!NER'S CERTIFICATE OF eLTLE_ dE OF THE ONNc3
BOARD OF APPEAL