110 JEFFERSON AVENUE - BOUCHARD, ROBERT - ZBA u _ 1
110 JEFFERSON AVE, R-1
i
Robert Bouchard
I
M i
I � �
i
ito Jatiers
i
a CtU of p alem, a6SUC USEjt51_it
Pattrb Df �Vyvd NAR to j N 1, 63
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF ROBERT BOUCHARDE6� "-
PERMIT FOR 110 JEFFERSON AVENUE
A hearing on this Petition was held on March 23, 1983, with the following
Board Members present: .James Hacker, Chairman; Messrs. Hopper, Feeherry,
Piemonte and LaBrecque. Notices of the hearing were sent to abutters
and others and notices of. the hearing.were properly published in the Salem Evening
News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
". Petitioner has requested,the right to construct an addition to.the structure
and the use at .the .site. The proposed addition will be approximately 22' x 47' .
The existing structure and use (gas station, repair shop, etc.) are non=conforming. .
The provision of the Salem. Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this request
for a Special Permit is Section V B :10,`which provides as follows:
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this `
Ordinance, the Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the .
procedure and conditions set forth in Section VIII F and I% D,
grant Special Permits for alterations and reconstruction of uon—
: conforming structures, and .for ,changes, enlargement, extension of
expansion of nonconforming lots, .land, structures, and uses,
provided, however, that such change, extension, enlargement- or
expansion shall not be substantially Imre detrimental than.the .
existing nonconforming use to the neighborhood.
In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit requests,
guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted upon a finding
by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will promote the health, safety,
convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants.
The Board, after considering the evidence at the hearing on this matter,
finds as follows:
1.. The proposed addition was unopposed by neighbors:
2. The proposed addition will be used for state auto
inspections and will therefore benefit the City's inhabitants.
On the basis of these findings of fact and on the evidence presented at the public
hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes: (i) that the proposed expansion of the
property will not be substantially more detrimental than the existing use
to the neighborhood, (ii) that the proposed expansion of the property will
promote the health, safety, convenience, and welfare of the City's inhabitants,
and (iii) that the proposed expansion of the property is in harmony with the
Salem Zoning Ordinance. Accordingly, the Board unanimously approved the
granting of the requested Special Permit to the Petitioner.
L -
ItI�R LL J �w �1+ 193
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF-ROBERT BOUCHARD CITI ,,FICE
FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT FOR 110 JEFFERSON AVENUE SALEM, MASS-
PAGE 2
March 23, 1983 ;
1) The proposed addition shall be constructed in accordance with the plans
submitted to the Board.
2). Detailed plans shall be submitted to the Building Inspector for his,.
approval prior to any constructions ,at: the site.
3) Petitioner shall obtain.a Certificate of Use and Occupancy for the
entire structure before using the addition.
Anthon .. r"eeherry
Secretary t
APPEAL FROM THIS DECISION, IF ANY;SHALL BE MADE PURSUANT TO SECTION 17 OF THE MASS.
GENERAL LAWS. CHAPTER 808, AND SHALL BE FILED WITHIN 20 DAYS AFTER THE DATE OF FILING
OF THIS DECISION H1 THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK. - - - -
- - PURSAaNT TO MASS. GENERAL LA.VIS. CHAPTER 808, SECTION 11, THE VARIANCE OR SPECIAL PERMIT -
- GRANTED HEREIN. SHALL NOi TAKE EFFECT UINTIL A COPY OF THE DECISION. BEARINI: THE CERT- -
FiCATION OF THE CITY CLERK THAT 20 DAYS HAVE ELAPSED ANO NO AF-PEAL HAS BEEN FILED.
OR 1HAT, IF SUCP AN APPEAL HAS BEEN FILE, THAT IT HAS BEEN DIS::;ISSED OR DENIEO IS - -
RECORDED IN THE SOUTH ESSEX REGISTRY OF DEEDS AND INDEXED UNDER THE NAii,E OF THE OWNER _
OF RECORD OR IS RECORDED AND NOTED ON THE OWNER'S CERTIFICATE OF TITLE.
BOARD OF APPEAL -
A COPY OF THIS DECISION AND PLANS HAVE BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK
�I