56 JEFFERSON AVENUE - INGEMI, STEPHEN - ZBA [5.6'-`JEFFERSON AVE.
' Stephen Ingemi
J '
C�
• s pw_l � Of cAp ead '82 NOV 22 K1 :1
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF STEVEN INGEMI REQUESTINGA VARIANCE
FOR 56 JEFFERSON AVENUE CITY I, .I 1.` . Or ICE
SA LC.i r;. ."—
A hearing on this Petition was held on November 17, 1981 with the following Board Members
present: James Hacker, Chairman; Messrs. Hopper, LaBrecque and Feeherry and Associate
Member Luzinski. Notices of the hearing were sent to abutters and others and notices
of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massa-
chusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
The Petitioner has requested a variance for 56'-Jefferson AveuLe vzadd air
d e_siT- , &7 I,
dwelling unit to the ground floor of the structure.
The Board of Appeal, after consideration of the evidence presented at the public
hearing and after viewing the property makes the following findings of fact:
1. The Petitioner has already made a considerable investment in the property and has
vastly improved the appearance of the property.
2. The Petitioner's proposal was strongly supported by the neighborhood.
3. There is adequate off-street parking at the site.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and the evidence presented at the public hear-
ing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
_
.-I-The property in question is unique because of the structure on the site which was
previously used for commercial purposes and can be remodeled only at a considerable
expense. This situation imposes a hardship on the Petitioner by restricting his
development of the property in a manner which is consistent with the surrounding area.
2. The conditions described above especially affect the land in question but do not
generally affect the zoning district in which the land is located.
3. The conditions described above which affect the land in question, but not the zoning
district generally cause special financial hardship to the Petitioner.
4. The desired variance may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good.
Therefore, the Board of Zoning Appeal unanimously voted in favor of approving the grant
of the requested relief. The Board grants a variance to the Petitioner on the following
terms and conditions:
1. Petitioner may add a one-bedroom residential dwelling on the street-level of the property
2. Constructionshall be in accordance with the Plans submitted to the Board.
3. Hereafter, the property may be used as a three-family dwelling. Howev6r, no commercial
uses shall be allowed at the site.
4. Not less than three parking spaces shall be maintained at the site.
5. A Certificate of Use and Occupancy shall be obtained prior to renting the additional
rental unit at the site. �/ /f �f
APFE=.L FROM THIS DECIS30fl. IF ANY. SHALL BE MADE PU3SUANT TD SECTION 17 OF {�''rC,1c7��y:,f<<t:'� I/l.� ' i
CEI[ERdI Li.V;S, CHA,'TER CO3' AND SHALL BE FILED I+ '!
OF 'il DLC j7 III T'1E OF IC (, T;Ic Cl-'Y CLC II `0 DAYS AFTER THE DATAnthO M. Fee}'err
Pu F5q�r b �' fl_ y>�ecretar`y,
TJ f PiS i.E I°R?! L"-(S GA-rcP 813 ° �(ICf 11
A ON .THfs`61$tVq'ION AND(TL*gS,H'4, gjAE �y4� Dry ISH 2HE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK
' F CITY CLMR Ti AT 20 C1'1; h.1VE EV c;P
uR iH T. c SUCH AN APPEAL u lr.�J T'0 E
P,E.i;,.CED I:I THE SOOIH EfS'SiX P6 EEiRYFGF DEEDS HAT LAND rINVEXED'UiIU• THEr, '✓- 0, ,
OF P,EC_RJ OR IS RECORDED AND NOTED ON THE 0'i/TIER'S CERTIFICATE OF TITLEn,, c u
BOARD OF APPEAL -