10-10 1/2 HANCOCK STREET - OUELLETTE, FRANK & DIANNE - ZBA (2) I
10-101 Hancock St. R-2
Frank & Diane Ouellette
1
\1
1Q
r
c%
Y
Ctu of "Salem, afimc4uutts
>1 , Pnttrb of c4yrA
U
CITY DECSSION ON`PHE PETITION OF FRANK AND DIANE OUELLETTE
S'FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT FOR 10-101-1HANCOCK ST. , SALEM (R-2)
A hearing on this petition was held on June 20, 1984 with the following Board
Members present: James Hacker, Chairman; Messrs. , Gauthier, Luzinski, Strout and
Associate Member Bencal. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and
notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in
accordance with .Massachusetts General Lairs Chapter 40A.
Petitioners are requesting a special Permit to convert a four family dwelling into
a five family duelling in this R-2 district.
The Board of Appeal after hearing the- evidence presented at the hearing and after
viewing the plans of the proposed fifth apartment makes the following findings
of fact:
1 . There was neighborhood opposition;
2. A serious parking problem on the street exists at the present time
and the Special Permit, •if granted, would possibly increase the problem.
On the basis of the above findings of fact and on the evidence presented at the
hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as .follows:
1 . The Special Permit requested would be substantially more detrimental
than the existing use to the neighborhood and will not promote the
health, 'safety, convenience and welfare of the city's inhabitants.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously against the granting of
the Special Permit.
SPECIAL PERMIT DENTED
Peter Strout, Board of Appeal
A COPY OF THIS DECISFON HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK
APPEAL FROM THIS t- IS;nN• IF ANY, SHALL BE MADE PURSUANT TO SECTION 17 OF THE MASS.
GENERAL LAWS. C'.APT R Z23.. MND SHALL BE FILED (VITHIN 20 DAYS AFTER THE DATE OF FILING
iiifS DEC!SIOC: CI TfiE C:=i10E CF THE CITY CLER!(.
✓ 'iil TO h:�GS. C='-;SC 4L C'.5:5. CHAPTER ESE, SECT!0N 11. THE VARIA".ICE OR
^EC!AI. PE;Jr:1T
v.`..'.E EFFECT UNTIL A COPY OF THE DECIV� -'PE CERT-
n. .i D- i T.K. if-rd 20 DAYS HPVE ELAPSED % .0 NO APPEAL HPS ;ELN FILED,
APPEAL EAS BEEN FILE. THAI IT HSS urEN DIS?:ISSF9':CR DL"!ED IS
IN IH- ° ..I: ESSEN REilISTRY OF DEEDS A)ID INUEXED UN12ER 1Hi NAME OF THE OWNER
OF REGORD OR IS R"-�RDED k.0 VOTED ON THE OViNER'S CERTIFICATE OF TITLE. _
BOARD OF APPEAL