10-10 1/2 HANCOCK STREET - OUELLETTE, FRANK & DIANNE - ZBA i6.0t ftidd6A St. ft-�
Frank & Dianne Ouellette
r--
J
i
�ra
c n_ -V;
4 w �t1tt of =7
at -y J
j Q
H PuttrD of Appettl
r
3 Z -
S, c
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF FRANK & DIANE OUELLETTE FOR
A VARIANCE FOR 10-102' HANCOCK ST. , SALEM
r
A hearing on this petition was held on October 24, 1984 with the F6116wing Board
Members present: James Hacker, Chairman; Messrs. , Charnas, Gauthier, Luzinski and
Associate Member Bencal. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others.
and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in
accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioners are requesting a Variance to convert an existing four family dwelling
into a five family dwelling in this R-2 district.
The Board of Appeal, after careful deliberation, decided there was substantial
difference from this petition and the petition for a Special Permit which was
denied on June 20, 1984. Therefore the Board voted unanimously to hear this
petition.
The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding of the
Board that:
a. special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect
the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally
affecting other lands, buildings and structures in the same district;
b. literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would in-
volve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to petitioner; and
c. desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
.intent of the district or the purposes of the Ordinance.
After hearing the evidence present at the hearing the Board makes the following
findings of fact:
1 . No opposition was raised by neighbors
2. Neighbors showed their support either by letter or appearance;
3. The proposed use would be in harmony with the neighborhood.
On the basis of the above findings of fact and on the evidence presented at
the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1 . Special conditions exist which affect this lot but do not affect
the district generally;
2. Literal enforcement of the Ordinance would work a substantial hardship
upon petitioner;
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF FRANK Sc DIANE OUELLETTE
FOR A VARIANCE FOR 10-102' HANCOCK ST. , SALEM
page two.
3. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good or without substantially derogating from the intent and
purpose of the Ordinance.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously in favor of granting
the petitioner the Variance requested under the following terms and conditions:
1 . Eight on site parking spaces be maintained;
2. The premises shall remain owner occupied, if the property ceases to
be owner occupied it will revert to a four family;
3. A Certificate of Occupancy must be obtained.
VARIANCE GRANTED
� w
f� U
l`N
y ames B. Hacker, Chairman
J
A 3OPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK
APPEAL FROM. THIS DECISION, IF ANY, SHALL BE MADE PURSUANT T0. SECTION 17 OF THE MASS.
GENERAL LA! . CHAPTER E08, A14D SHALL BE FILED WITHIN 20 DAYS AFTER THE DATE OF FILING
OF THIS OE"!S:0% IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK.
T -.-S '_ Lr:. S CHAFER 808. SECTI N 11 THE VARIANCE OR S °CIA.L PERMIT
PU Fa !J _
GP.ANTH¢%':'2Sn.$ CE-I��An'-- i EFFECT ECi UI-TIL A C^_PY OF The DECISIO'V BEA,-'j% THE CERT-
.FICATION CF IH-. Cf'y CJ ERX, THAT 20 DAYS HAZE EL?.F.,cD A..D NO APPEAL HAS ° i FILED.
OR Thi A:. IF SUCH AN APPEAL HAS SEEN FILE, THAT IT HAS BEEN DISin ISSED OR DENIED IS
RECORDED IN THE SOUTH ESSEX REGISTRY CF DEEDS AND INDEXED UNDER OF T E NA;
E OF THE OWNER
OF RECORD OR IS RECORDED AND NOTED ON THE OWNER'S CE
BOARD OF APPEAL