Loading...
8 ESSEX STREET - DEROIN, CRAIG - ZBA 8 Essex St. R-2 Craig Dercin, Tr. J r i �,. du 16 3 o2 PH 09 f�iitU of �ttlrm, C�ttsStttltu5c#ts r(`r* ? T Dttrb of RC1 PI11 MY CLERK,S4.'.':-. `;ASS. DECISION ON THE PETITION OF CRAIG DEROIN, TR. FOR VARIANCES FOR 8 ESSEX STREET (R-2) A hearing on this petition was held April 27, 1988 with the following Board Members present: James Hacker, Chairman; Messrs. , Bencal, Fleming, Luzinski and Strout. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioner, Trustee of the 8 & 8 Rear Trust, owner of the property, is requesting the following Variances: Lot area, area per dwelling unit, width, lot coverage, front, side, rear setbacks and parking to allow the property at 8 Essex Street to be divided into two lots. Property is located in an R-2 district. The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding of the Board that: a. special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings and structures in the same district; b. literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would in- volve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise to the petitioner; c. desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1 . The buildines on this lot have existed there since 2. There was no opposition. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1 . Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property but not the district generally; 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Ordinance would work a substantial hardship on the petitioner; 3. The relief requested can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. r / D"CiSION 06, .,_ _ ;C r.. F. . FOR o ESSEX -. , SA =.. page two Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, �-0, to grant the Variances requested on condition the parcel be divided as shown on plans. GRANTED ames B. Hacke , Chairman A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK APPEAL FRS':. ?HiS DECJS nt :I, I:' ANY, SHALL BE VADE PURSUANT U ;S7Mr! :7 CF THE W!.- -N- /IF:..i' SIE A;iD SH,'dl F! ..n 20 D.YS 6FTEF E_ C;.'E ili i _ ..S .r C H7 ^ tE CITCLERK. A Ci�i :F THdfi 7 .., E OR 1HC S,, A:: 4Pr7 F. L N :, it I. H:S P JS' _. C - _...=J IS RE' ' TH: S.U,n ESSEX PE : R'i CF GEES A%D INDn7 'i ...: :r i':. ^;.. OF RECORD OR IS RECORDS AND NOiEO ON THE O'h'NER'S CERTIFICATE OF TITLE. BOARD OF APPEAL S�. WEBB 04GLISH ST BECKET L ST t sT FOR REGISTRY USE - LOCUS-NO SCALE ST . NICHOLAS D RUSSIAN ORTHODOIX 3 GREEK CATHOLIC o CHURCH OF SALEtA r 0 EDWARD D . & CANICE C. to McGLYNN o 190.60 J N CLF 3 (DE D-66r5.5 )---- STORY Ld 9 , _.....j.................. 16.5' S38°-37'46„E 123 40Ld RAMI F (� v IW 75.44 . (DEED 120. I5) (n ~ � FIFTY SIX TRUSTts s�M _ E GHT AND � 47.96 - LLig 2 1 /2 z Q �,' # 8 G� R o E Q o� mla STORY_ mt �� `; . �z 2 STORY FRAME w o RUST Q a� d FRAME L–O-T—�-LLL; _ '� Q g 2 STORY FRAME W r W > z d m © ,. W! _ F S ' .\ �. v a W/ BRICK FACE # a W m �0. //\ n 'S Q �S�/� ♦33 6\ z \ (LYDIA'S SUB SFIOP) Rte'c1 :! W n �/�� 3�F� CONCRETE PAp- @ N°1 7 W 9 S 38°- T�•'Tifn N ® ; �� 46 -50 E 00—_ PADC LOT I _ Z '- of 25.610 ) — - - - - -- U O (DEED-25.234_ _ __-Q' R��y L O T 2 T OF WAY TO LOT 3 -- - °, m LL_ BIT. CONC. -28' E 46.70 (DEED 36.20) 41.44 S44 49 CLF 80.87' (DEED 88.00) S41°-42-19 E S450-39'- I I E N44 -35-08 IE S 48°-10-26 E O- 41.50 (DEED) 3.00 44°-43-52� CLF 1 CLF 2.08 LJ - CHARLES J . & DIXIE B . Lo POWERS SYL'V IA LEWIS S DEE . W LOT I AREA = 1,661 Sq, Ft. LOT 2 - AREA = 2,74 2 Sq. Ft. LOT' 3 - AREA = 2,882-,. Sq. Ft. Y THE APPROVAL OF Tf '!S PLAt•', "j _'S 1NOT ESiF;^LISHH T1 ; `Y,:,TIt, G WINING OFDiNANCE Or T, ,_ CITY 0SALEPA SALEM PLANNING BOARD . MOTES: I CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN IS BASED UPON AN ACTUAL FIELD SURVEY �► U B D I I S I 0 N FLAN 0 F . A N D MADE ON THE GROUND BETWEEN JULY 14 AND JULY 16, 1985 AND ( L) PARKING SPACES I THRU 5 ARE 20.0 BY 9.0 CONFORMS; WITH THE RULES AND REGULATIONS OF THE REGISTERS OF DEEDS. (2.) ORIGINAL SUBDIVISION PLAN WAS PREPARED FOR FRED CARDELLA BY LINENTHAL EISENBERG ANDERSON,INC. DATED JULY_ 21, 1986 T (3J THIS PLAN HOLDS ORIGINAL LOT DELINEATION BUT STAWI.FiA. ` ` MODIFIES PARKING SPACE SIZE AND SHOWS A PROPOSED MdVTOSH COMBINATION EASEMENT AND RIGHT OF WAY IN FAVOR OF . • W.fm LOT 3, HAVING AN AREA OF 1,895 SQ. FT. SALEM �o ' MASS . ' PREPARED FOR PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR #27293 FIFTY SIX TRUST lit APrP_0VAL LI).)D�2 SUgDI�lISla1.1 AUGUST 31 , 1987 SCALE 1 ” =10 ' . S�� P )JNI _ BOA♦ ' �' - - LINENTHAL EISENBERG ANDERSON , INC . 75 : KNEELAND ST . BOSTON MASS 0 10 20 30 40 50 FT. 0 5 10 15 M. u..Lrn"196.00