95 OCEAN AVENUE - SULDENSKI, JOHN - ZBA 95 Ocean Ave. B-4)
John ,Suldenski
�s
-3-
II{ 2IlPI1t� Ctt882IC1ISPffS
PnttrD of �1eui RF��EIVED
T5 APR 30 P3 :03
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF JOHN SULDENSKI FOR A
SPECIAL PERMIT FOR 95 OCEAN AVE. , SALEM CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
SALEM MAS
A hearing on this petition was held April 24, 1985 with the following Board Members
present: James Hacker, Chairman; Messrs. , Charnas, - Gauthier, Luzinski and Strout.
Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing
were properly published in the Salem Evening- News in accordance with Massachusetts
General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioner, owner of the property, requests a Special Permit to convert a two
family dwelling into a three family dwelling in this B-4 district.
The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this request
for a Special Permit is Section V B 10, which provides as follows:
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance,
the Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions
set forth in Section VIII F and IX D, grant Special Permits for
alterations and reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and for
changes, enlargement, extension or expansion of nonconforming lots,
land, structures and uses, provided, however, that such change,
extension, enlargement or expansion shall not be substantially -more
. detrimental than, the existing use to the neighborhood.
In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit requests,
guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted upon a finding
by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will promote the public health,
safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants.
The Board of Appeal, after considering the evidence presented at the hearing and
after viewing plans of the property, makes the following findings of fact:
1 . Building would not be owner occupied;
2. Would not substantially increase the tax base of the City;
3. Residential neighbors were not in favor of the petition;
4. Would not substantially improve the character of the neighborhood.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at
the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1 . The proposed use will not promote the public health, safety, convenience
and welfare of the City' s inhabitants;
2. The relief requested cannot be granted without substantial detriment '
to the public good.
7 �
I
1 DECISION ON THE PETITION OF JOHN SULDENSKI FOR A
SPECIAL PERMIT FOR 95 OCEAN AVE. , SALEM
• page two
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal by a vote of three (3) in favor (Mr. Charnas,
Mr. Gauthier & Mr. Strout) and two (2) opposed (Mr. Hacker & Mr. Luzinski) denied
the Petitioner the relief requested.
SPECIAL PERMIT DENIED. ^ p
ames B. Hacker, Chairman
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK
L4I,M FR7Y. THIS DECISION, IF ANY. SHALL BE MADE PURSUANT TO SECTION 17 OF THE MASS.
GEAERAL LAYS, CHAPTER EDS, AND , LL BE FILED WITHIN 20 DAYS AFTER THE DATE OF FILING
OF THIS DECIS'GN IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK.
t r tq�;,B. G6s E°••".L L;::!>. CH7.riER EDS. SECTION 11, THE VA-FIANCE OR SPECIAL PERMIT
PUkS..N. T E-r-, n -
. GRANTED -- G SHFiI 1 , i uPJi.. A. 6.,?Y OF THE OECI .i, 6v THE CER -
fiCATG'� ..F H Cliti J.
,pt c� A - H4''E :LADS_'? r') i.. ? Sl HAS FIE,:; FILED,
OR 'Fi,T. IF �JL7 + %%� P.:�.cE '' rig` THF;c Ii J' I °C)LdDL a i-f°Frt � 1: GF THE 0l4?i ER
RECOSOED IN THE SJUTH ESSIX P--.;I&F 1, DEED �
OF RECORD OR IS RECORDED ANO NOTED uN THE OWNER'S CERTIFICATE OF TITLE. n 03
Qn
BOARD OF APPEA�).( xr
a Dn a
_n w i
C') o
rn w
•
Q
i
4
LOT 77Lo7
76
50
i
N
Aeon = 5600 5F.T
v
��T FS? cb LoT -70
N
ss g0 .
r
A40MAGE SURVEY PLAN
1 Localion _._ h.':e r�. Mass
Scale /in, = 30 ft Date
Reference
1�E"amu .........7Ss-cam u,,'._.•
_....r--- ..
Aeve This is o rope survey and not an instrunent
survey therefore this pbt p/an is for mortgage
purposes only.
BAY STATE SURVFYING SERt4CE AW.
211 Cabot St., Beverly, Mass.
/ hereby certify that the alvelling shown or
this plan was located on the ground as stnwn
/hereon and that it conforms b the inning and
building ordinances afthe_C!rr 0 Sa,
when constructed and to restrictions on record.
Area is nm in the special flood hazard zone.•
-
i
GDT 0 LOT 37
FiPsl S EiP /170TO/F' EXP�PES S, �PEit/E �` Fi5 4AICc S M.
/NC• MA�t'Q U/S
4 7;
9, 9; 9, F
SPTt7C S "
2 3 4 `
LOT 60
.41'FEA = 4406 ±S F
LOT 9 t�ORClw LOT 6/
�OBER7-L/. �` T�/EFESA B, Za. ST. P16-1e�PES' 6.4e4649, /AX.
A4CC4ULEf/
"
fid PCLI 3.8 i3 r,
� P 1
6'6 � V A 1/E/VUE
,4:aSESSORS IvLAP 33
c,v/L�in1G. fJPPL�Crf?7o,i/
7c7 C/�Nl/E.2'� Tb
3 UMTS .
O�Epl1 H Of / L4/VI O� ZAIVD
0
Rn //V
No -
.
OSTERES k�
N4L LAND
.-�` '✓ JD�/il/ 9-'V L�/�/VY �f
�.t'E�'4RE0 8Y
ESSEX SUR!/EY5'ERE//CES /NC.
/8/ ESSEX STiPEE-T, sq lomat
SC4LE l "= ZO' .4PR/L /8, 1989-
/0775
989-
/0775
UPTE -VM REVi910N RFCORD DR CN
a
� F
,�
i ! t
I
i �
31
I
-H
IT I I
i � N
• ' w
a
f
F
TOLERANCES T
IExCEP1 A8 NOtCOi 95 �A N AV- 1SI
DECIMAL �Alf_stiOE tV..�t, -�� 9GALE DRAWN BV G1�
\�+ 4` S1
`)LI?�Di(✓ � �4J,0 ff//I��//-- j APP{P�OVED BY
FRACTIONAL TITLE W I NE.70W L.'_IL.AT {, ON REFER
To 2.raspy VrR .
o -
C9 ANGULAR
DME DRAWING NUMBER
Z
2
—_ ----I T — __.—
- v
a _
N<)-r ON
,ate ��.
r ri 1
i � I
����y � O.C.
,r� t t
W I[V3./�.•/1N p O.C. F �i A i..k-S,
r_
�ry�y._ �.•,_..�-. .....r..... _ f x_7"1
4
95 CXEAN AV. 2►.0
. WlN,3•:+lv'S 2`^fin X5 -O
•-...-�n +. +:W++M4e.�•.w gn+._!/•i.�.a+n•P!a.-. 'X�YN�4+r.Wn.aV..wve._....�
r
6
.nr_..w ..... . ....�... rw....waa i.w_. �.aa.-._...l A.✓a...y.�.ni_sV. +IK1Mw.�.�•.�w�Y�'+^s.N+.w�..i. .• �-ryw�..�/�.�4_.b+.w.�wwyn
-
.nwr..r
E
J•
i
r
1 ON
i
i •333
r '
N
I
ITi
T
� 1
LLD 1�GGM 1 BED FcQ^I 6:C) pc>c '") 0" l
f ~ 4
BATH 11
----------------------------
U-1
LNIt�I�:� '?.Or)m N I
710
�.
;�
�'1
Q ,
� I
I
�'�
�_
-- _r
____
_ -
-- -