51R,4 CANAL ST, FLORENCE STREET - TANZER, SAUL - ZBAVT 51H Canal St./
4 Florence St. B-4/n-2 -
Leonard Samia (Pet) _ \
Saul Tanzer Trust (own) _
1
1
i
I,
?;;r �DxrD of '�Ppenl
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF LEONARD J. SAMIA FOR
VARIANCES FOR R51 CANAL .ST./4 FLORENCE ST. , SALEM
A Public Hearing on this petition was held July 24, 19�lttn t�ey��V�p��� g Board
Members present: James Hacker, Chairman; Messrs. , Chatt3s, ' GaiTthler; Strout and
Associate Member Bencal. Notice of the hearing was se ? abutters and others
and notices of the hearing were properly published in the S^alleexm Evening News in
.�_ s•, su
accordance with Massachusetts General Law Chapter 40A. �, „�..:. :1 ... . is^-
Petitioner requests a Variance to allow the premises, which are partly in a B-4
district, to be used either for warehousing, wholesale merchandise brokerage and
storage, carpentry, woodworking and printing shops, or retail uses related to
those uses. Petitioner also requests a Variance from parking requirements so that
only a minimum of fourteen (14) spaces be maintained on premises. The property is
owned by Saul Tanzer Trust, Nathan M. Tanzer, Trustee and is located in a B-4/R-2
district.
The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding of the
Board that:
a. special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect
the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally
affecting other lands, buildings and structures in the same district;
b. literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would in-
volve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to petitioner; and
c. desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
The Board of Appeal, after hearing the evidence presented at the hearing, makes
the following findings of fact:
1 . No opposition was presented to the plan;
2. The size and shape of this lot, and the position of the
building relative to the lot lines, are unique to the district.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the
hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1 . Special conditions affect this lot which do not generally affect
the district;
2. Literal enforcement of the Zoning Ordinance would work a substantial
hardship upon the petitioner;
3. The variance requested can be granted without substantial detriment
to the public good and without substantially derogating from the intent
and purpose of the Ordinance.
r
' r.11`. ._ �� _ .i ._G . ..
^1 ti
1
i � /
��
._ � __ _ _ s-_. -fig-- �.jr
� r
,_ �. °.
y�Ar•r��
�4ti�
i �"4:yy
. i
it
F
I
a ,
'tri• '' { �$ _ �
F
j'a• 1
y
rA
�+i
� . �`
�; �' ..
;� , � ��,.
•.t -1 ' .,0 A.
3 a
..� � N ...
c` , } ' � �
,'
..q ;�
N � 7. �
� ` ��
_ .r � _
r.: .rl ," ; 1 , M1
-' ,u
,� } �•
47 '
Td__l
r_ _ QF e - -
a
�, N� _.
1
'� � �
O �, A
*0 �
\. �. '{ .
` � �`� . r
� a ' �'btlad�
4� A ��
� ,tea n.•
C-� � h
d` d
r
7� I
r
..y � �_ _
pp'�-���'� � _
`.t. ,,
WYY� -L� n��� • ,T
y `
��
W`
i'
ti. .�,_,
a r�
Oda 3�dA3 CIS d� c
d �
o �
{.� p. .
-�..- - .!
��
' �� �.� �
,.:
�r
� ,� ,�,
�°'� .
i-, .�
E.
_. _ .- I
9y
1`
AS60
- .! ...
..SU
-
'Ap �' ��
_ __ __ _ i _
I
L
+-3.
���14T �•
1
Y `
y
I -
�� � � � ��
•_Y
..... .. . ... .. .. s._�
_vra ., _,', K
• �. �� i
-- _. ,}„L
- ��-
.;
..y,�s�> >, ��.�, '
��i �,
.�- -
a
r�
s
a�G� 1
:°�'�;
��+:9
I
O '•
't✓ II/Jr
�\
�`.� �a
y. .,
x� �::
§•I .
Y".
•.
41
�� r�I f
611 v
07 r
�. 1 r
t 3 ..
� •�
O� �. .� � t, ;_ n
a3 :• a''
n
p
i.
a �•
a , ,
� ' r,'' .
.p ^� Hyl
,`�r�
b ` yi
� �,
�3d' ad 7 � +
d ' .�
� �
♦P � � `
v
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF LEONARD J. SAM,IA FOR
VARIANCES FOR R51 CANAL ST./4 FLORENCE ST. , SALEM .
page two
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously 5-0 to grant the
Variances requested provided that:
1 . No storage of any materials be done outside the building;
2. A minimum of fourteen (14) parking spaces be maintained on
premises;
3. This plan be approved by the Salem Fire Department.
VARIANCES GRANTED
Scott E. Charnas, Secretary
A COPY OF THIS DECISION & PLANS HAVE BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND
THE CITY CLERK
APPEAL PROM THIS DECISION, 1; AiJY, SHALL BE MADE PUASUANT TO SECTION 17 OF THE MASS.
CENERAL AWS. CHAP-,ER SDE. A':D SHALL BE FILED W H N 20 DAYS AFTER THE DATE OF FILING
OF THIS C'ECIS!ON IN THE C:;-CE OF THE CITY CLE_RK-
PURSANT TO MASS. CENER6l LA';,*S, CHAPTER 803, SE_C'101t 11, THE VARIANCE OP. SP:IAL PEP.%'IT
GRANTED HEREIN. SH A,LL NOT TAKE EFi EC.T UNTIL A CO FY OF THEDE..,a,:N. BErc::'S THE CERT'
FICATION OF THE CITY CLERt, THAI 20 DAYS HAV: ELAPSED AND NC APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED,
_ . OR THAT, IF SUCH AN APPE,! HAS BEEN FILE. THAIITHrS BEEN MSL�IS3ED CR OE":IED IS
'RECORDED IN THE SGUTH ESSEf REGISTRY OF DEEDS AND II:DEKED UNDER THE NA!&.E OF THE OV.NER -
OF RECORD OR IS RECORDED AND NOTED ON THE OWNER'S CERTIFICATE Of TITLE.
BOARD OF APPEAL -
f
City of harem, Onoarbuottg
Public Propertp Aepartment
jBuilbing 30epartment
(One Tatem Oreen
745-9595 Cxt. 380
William H. Munroe
Director of Public Property
Inspector of Buildings
Zoning Enforcement Officer
May 21 , 1990
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
RE: Salem Car Wash 551=Canal Street(B= /R=2)
—mss
The above referenced property and structure presently
being used as a car wash has the protection of Massachusetts
General Laws. The Building Permit to erect the structure
was issued by this department on May 19, 1978 and the Certificate
of Occupancy, signifying that construction was complete was
issued in December of 1978.
Under Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 7,
the statute of limitations on the building permit expired after
six (6) years and on any zoning violations after ten (10) years.
Regarding the fifty percent (50%) rule, Section VIII, Article
D, -.of the City of Salem Zoning Ordinance states that "should a
structure be destroyed by any means to an extent of more than
fifty percent of its floor area at the time of destruction, it
shall not be reconstructed except in conformity with the provisions
of this Ordinance."
Sincerely,
William H.Munroe
Zoning Enforcement Officer
WHM:bms
l
n1Q�6
r
� a�T
esse t '
1
m
N \Z
rensr -- - --- --- - 0. SR�AII
FREDERICK ------ --'►
� � - - Cocas 5 ; CANAL TREE (
_ R T P. I. , A.L. t L.W. L- oT 8�
Ro5EN FIELE;
J T
MON
AhJAL ST-
L o cvs M•9P I oT Q 7
SCALE 1-= 1000
FL o.e EA-1 CE 5rREET EX TEA.1 S/oA1 4 T
n /e Cj FIR LOT A'UMBER
o^ •J � ADINCCONCRETE W R p SPiff ASSLSSORS
CE '--� - 9' r /g' lv�
LDADING OOCN A
Ov� T %s°N ti oi ' S&
Cdz
` `CORNER ON UNE
I� i4 5
SIDNEY M i
ELAINE
DRAGON FARM -
�E�1/CE 7f3E E'EMO%�D G E 0 R 6 E K.
' a 6E OR61NA L 054000
DT 10y ,0
CONCRETE BLOCK BUILDING ROPES
01 J E?"
�► . ,� LOT a>a
WOB EAT W AREA : 22 . 431 - S. F.
DUNLA Y U
Y
y4 CEDAR •
• W BUILDING CORNEA
-)r ICS IAOAI AT PRSPIATY C01lNfR 705EPH ELIA
(, (SET) PICAAIELLO
I FLOP
Ar A
m
1
CLINTON D E 4! .67 oil ,� C E
C LESTOUNE o
MADDEN
A el
A D D E N Yse7/ ,
I CEATIfY THAT THIS PLAN WAS OF Q4S , v
PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH OBER,Tsgoy TO ��
ry01 � 1
THE RULES AND RECULATIONS OF or RoeERT �f, FE/VCE E mmA �0 P�� HUR ERR n
RE 7EA� Of�11EE0 I eowrn 7 0�. t�E/L9c . E PL 4Al OF CA.vo
AT! yo^ AEG7STEPE�� CH ;
` 1A.1
FOR REGISTRY USE ONLY oNALL 40A RLCHpRp R. 1
T 4 SAL EM, h14455.
� LDHELLE A.
KALE ►DA y PREPARED FOR
la (; HENRY 5T. THIISCPLANFY THAT ARE THE LIINESROPERTY DIVIDINGLINS SHOWN ON
E fSTINO OWNER- � 4L/L TAAJZi:R
LDT 9ti SHIES ANITH! LINES OFTHE STREETS AND WAYS
SHOWN ARE THOSE Of PUBLIC OR PRIVATE STAEITS
AND WAYS ALREADY WAILISHED AND I FUATIEA 3CA�l.' 1 = 1r1 JUNE 1@. 1185
CERTIFY THAT NO NEW LINES f1A DIVISIIN Of
EY13TING OWNER SHIP OR FOR AIN WAYS Aft SOWN.
G>MAP iA
e11 M. G.L. SCC. BI x Pew OF .vgss • C o s �• !_ .e
dll PdJ� P.ob RT
E D"MMAN N 181 E531Y STREET, SALE,M. M.
No. 18887 0
RE6ISTEAtD LAND SURVEYOR msN6/saM�S�
9770