Loading...
108,47, 50 CONGRESS, LEAVITT, PALMER STREETS - KEEFE, JOHN - ZBA 108 Congress/47 Leavitt and 50 Palmer Sts. Yj — — — John Keefe, Pres. — L Q �o of 'Salem, assachuse#fs s Pottrb of '4PE l Y (41,6 '87 MA4 31 P 3 :00. DECISION ON THE PETITION OF JOHN KEEFE FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AND/OR VARIANCE FOR 108 Congpp� ;/; Fire 47 Leavitt $ 50 Palmer Streets A hearing on this petition was held March 18, 1987 with the following Board Iembers present: James Hacker„ Chairman; Messrs. , Fleming, .Bencal, Strout 14 and Associate Member Dore. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. The petitioner, represented by Attorney Kevin T. Daly , is requesting a Special Permit and/or Variance to divide property at 108 Congress/47 Leavitt and 50 Palmer Streets in this B-1/11-3 district. ,r The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this request fo= a Special Permit is Section V B 10, which provides as follows: Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set forth in Section VIII F and IX D, grant Special Permits for alterations and reconstruction of nonconforming structures , and for changes, enlargement, extension or expansion of nonconforming lots, land, structures, and uses, provided, however, that such change, extension, enlargement or expansion shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming use to the neighborhood. In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit requests, guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted upon a finding by the Board that the granting of the Special Permit will promote the public health , safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants.. The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding of the Board that: a. special conditions and circumstances exist v:hich especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings and struc ures in the same district; b. literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner; and c. desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after hearing the evidence presented at the hearing and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact. 1. There was no opposition to the proposal. 2. Division of the property will not change the use of the properties as 47 Leavitt Street and 108 Congress Street will remain as one lot. •1 On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at this hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes the following: ._ 1. The granting of a Special Permit would promote the public health, L} safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants. 2. Literal enforcement of the Ordinance would involve a substantial hardship of the petitioner. 3. Special conditions exist which especially affect the properties involved but do not generally affect the district; and t 3. The granting of the relief requested would not be detrimental to the public good and would not nullify or substantially derogate from the intent and purpose of the Ordinance. { Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously 5-0 to grant , 6 the Variance and Special Permit requested. GRANTED. C cce d 4w� Peter A. Dore, Associate Member ' Board of Appeal Y A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK f f i I DECISION, IF ANY. SHALL BE MADE PURSUANT TO SECTION HE 17 OF THE V.,'M APPEAL L LAV THIS GENERAL LAYlS. CHAPTER 806, AND SHALL BE FILED WITHIN 20 DAYS AFT Imo' OF THIS DECISIGN IN THE CFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK. P` 1 P-�,,.T PU i:SAST TO LASS_ C,E`IERAL LAWS CHkPi ER 2D6, SECTUN 11 THE VARIANCE OPS Tp r RT w GR=.%-ED HEREIN. SHALL No! TARE EFFECT UNTIL A COF1' OF THE DECI-11-' EF ND FIC TY RAT 20 VE i GRATFi. OF THE SUCH IAN APPEALTHP$ BEES FILE pTHATL IT SHASABEENy G$IfISSEOHOR CEXIEO T r REC'�RDED IN THE SOUTH ESSEX REGISTRY OF DEEDS AND IN Uf:DER THE NA'd"c CF THE 67;t:c; " iO ON THE OWNER'S CERTIFICATE OF TITLE. DF RECORD OR IS RECORDED AND NOT w t BOARD OF APPEAL 1. F :1 F