Loading...
98 MARGIN STREET - QUARTERONE, GIOVANNA - ZBA 98 Margin St. R-3 Giovanna Quarterone oG- i �I &; ota,� , I 98 Margin St. R-3 Giovanna Quarterone �ome1- �J/Miv �ealro�, JN/.oddo�ud�(/d 01960 ��d� ✓elsee�iet 08/591-96/S ���/���,�n�a, File No. 20976 November 21 , 1988 Board of Appeals City of Salem City Hall Salem, Massachusetts 01970 RE: Application for Variance Giovanna Quartarone 68 Margin Street Salem, Massachusetts Dear Sir or Madam: I am enclosing for filing in triplicate an Application for Variance relative to the above—referenced matter, together with three plot plans and appropriate filing fees in this regard. Additionally, as it is the policy of this office to date all checks; I am unable to comply with your request that said checks be undated. Please notify my office when a hearing date has been set. Very truly yours, :GZNE N T STERIO & OSBORNE MARK J. FAVALORO MJF/cls Enc. cc: Mr. James D. Santo Mr. Giovanna Quartarone COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS . Department of the Trial Court Esser, ss. Superior Court No. % �. vs. TRIAL NOTICE" The above entitled case is being called for Jury/Jury-Waive Trial on ��' �,T� / at �2Q Y-2YY1 at Essex Superior Court House, 32_ Federal St. , /Salem MA with the Honorable JOHN T,, RONAN-, presiding. ALL COUNSEL MUST APPEAR READY FOR TRIAL ON THE ABOVE DATE WITH WITNESSES WITHOUT WITNE- SS WITNESSES ON 20 min. TELEPHONE NOTICE PLEASE NOTIFY THE COURT PROMPTLY OF ANY SETTLEMENTS CLERK'S OFFICE 508-741-0200 COUNSEL SHALL BRING THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS WITH THEM. IF NOT ALREADY SUBMITTED AT THE TIME OF THE CONCILIATION CONFERENCE. A) trial memo; B) list of witnesses; C) list of exhibits; D) any pre-trial stipulations La . 61C/- yyDa FEB U 3 02 iii 'G9 Chi of ('U6SUr4U6rfW '+ecumr..R' ' peal DECISION ON THE PETITION CF GIOVANNA QUARTERONE FOR VARIANCE AT 98 MARGIN STREET (R-3) A hearing on this petition was held January 25, 1989 with the following Board Members present: James Fleming, Chairman; Messrs. , Bencal, Nutting, Strout and Associate LaBrecque. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts .General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioner, owner of the property is requesting Variances to allow the existing deck and fence to remain in this R-3 district. The Variances which have been requested may be granted upon a "finding of the Board that: a. special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings and structures in the same district; b. literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner; c. desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented, and after viewing the plan of land, makes the following findings of fact: 1 . Fence and deck are needed for privacy; 2. Topography of the land makes in unfeasible to locate the deck on any other part of the lot. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1 . Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property but not the district generally; 2. Literal enforcement of the Ordinance would work a substantial hardship on the petitioner; 3. The relief requested can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district of the purpose of the Ordinance. DECISION ON THE PETITION OF GIOVANNA O[IARTERONE FOR A VARIANCE FOR 98 MARGIN STREET, SALEM page two Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted, 4-1 , to grant the variance to allow the existing fence as requested. Mr. Bencal voted in opposition. The Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the variance to allow the existing deck as requested. VARIANCES GRANTED Peter Strout, Member, Board of Appeal A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK APPEAL FROM THIS DECISION, IF ANY. SHALL BE MADE PURSUANT TO SECTION 17 CF ':!` GENERAL LA';4S. CHAPTER BOB. AND SHALL BE FILED WITHIN 20 DAYS AFTER THE DATE OF OF THIS DECISION IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK. PORSANT TO MASS. FENERAL LAYS. CBAPTER 908. SECTION 11. THE VARIANCE OR SPECIAL ^_. '4T ,RANTED HEREIN. SHALL NOT TASE EFFECT UNTIL A COPY OF THE DECISIC"i. 9EA':NF; TH' --".T FICAT!::N ::F THE O. •; CLERK 1:0T 20 DAYS HAVE ELA.PCZO ;..'JO NO APPEAL HAS E,714 FILED, L:R IHAT, IF SJiH A.. APPE!1L HAS BEE"! FILE. THAT IT HAS BEEN DIS':ISSED OR DEi91EU IS Ru:I:::ED IN FFIE S52TH ESSEX REciSTRY OF DEEDS ANO INOE%ED UNDER THE NAME uF THE C'::;!E• OF RFIYIRO ORS RECOROEO AND NOTED ON THE U4NER'S CERTIFICATE OF TITLE. BOARD OF APPEAL COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS FEB 2I 2 59 �� X89 ESSEX, SS. TRIAL COURT DEPT. OF TH$lLcWPERIOR COURT CASE CAYV §101 M:MASS. ANNA PERRONE, ESTHER M. ) SANTANGELO AND JENNIE ) LAVERTY, ) PLAINTIFFS ) APPEAL UNDER THE V. ) PROVISIONS M.G.L. , CHAPTER 40A, SECTION GIOVANNA QUARTERONE AND ) 17 , AS AMENDED, FROM A JAMES M. FLEMING, RICHARD ) DECISION OF THE BOARD BENCAL, JOHN NUTTING, ) OF APPEAL OF THE CITY PETER STROUT AND ARTHUR ) OF SALEM LEBRECQUE AS THEY COMPRISE) THE BOARD OF APPEAL OF THE) CITY OF SALEM ) The Plaintiffs evoke the provisions of M.G.L. Chapter 40A, Section 17 , as amended, and respectfully represent as follows : 1 . That the Plaintiffs are as follows : (a ) Anna Perrone, the owner of land at 5 Prescott Street, Salem Massachusetts ; (b) Esther M. Santangelo, the co-owner of land at 102 Margin Street, Salem, Massachusetts ; and ( c ) Jennie Laverty, the co-owner of land at 102 Margin Street, Salem, Massachusetts. 2 . That the Defendant, Giovanna. Quartarone, is the owner of the property located at 98 Margin Street, Salem, Massachusetts . (the "Premises" ) . 3 . That the Defendants, James M. Fleming, Richard Bencal , John Nutting, Peter Strout and Arthur Lebrecque were at the time the Application of Giovanna Quaterone as hereinafter described, members of and did .constitute the Board of Appeal of the City of Salem; and that said Defendants at the time of the Application of the Defendant, Giovanna Quarterone, was approved as. hereinafter described did act upon said Application. The Defendants reside as follows : James M. Fleming Arthur Lebrecque 47 Buffum Streeet 11 Hazel Street Salem, MA 01970 Salem, MA 01970 Peter Strout John Nutting 244 Lafayette St. Salem, MA 01970 Moffat Road Salem, MA 01970 Sa Richard Bencal 19 Goodell Ave. Salem, MA 01970 4 '. That by application dated November 21 , .1988 and filed December 1 , 1988, the Defendant,. Giovanna Quarterone, applied to . the Board of Appeal of the City of Salem for variances from the City of Salem Zoning ordinance to allow the existing deck and fence to remain at the property located at 98 Margin Street, Salem, Massachusetts . Her application included the following requests : - 2 - 1 . A variance to permit the continued use of a deck in violation of density regulations set out in Section VI of the Salem Zoning Ordinance. 2 . A variance to permit the continued use of a fence in violation of the height requirements set out in Section VI of the Salem Zoning . Ordi- nance . A copy of this Application is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" . 5 . That a public hearing was held on this Application on January .25, 1989 , at which time the Board voted four ( 4 ) in favor, and one ( 1 ) opposed , to grant the variance to allow the existing fence as requested and voted five ( 5 ) in favor and no ( 0 ) opposed to grant the variance to allow the existing deck as requested. A copy of that decision attested to by the City Clerk is attached hereto as Exhibit "B" 6 . That the above decisions of the . Defendant Board is in excess of the powers granted to the members of the Board by M.G. L. , Chapter 40A, Section 10 . 7 . That for all times relevant to the Application and decision, the Plaintiffs were the owners of the property which directly abuts the "Premises" and are parties in interest as set forth in Massachusetts 3 - General Law c. 40A §11, and persons aggrieved by a decision of the Defendant Board, in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 40A, Section 17 . 9 . That in granting the requested relief the Defendant Board did not make specific findings as to the statutory prerequisites for the granting of a variance pursuant. to Massachusetts General Laws c . 40A §10 . 10 . That there would not be a substantial hardship to the Defendant, Giovanna Quaterone, to use the "Premises" for those purposes set forth in the Salem Zoning Ordinance. 11 . That the use of the "Premises" as requested would be a substantial detriment to the public 'good and would derogate from the purpose and intent of " the Salem Zoning Ordinance. 12 . That the failure of the Defendant Board to make specific findings as to the existence of the statutory prerequisites for determining a variance was in excess of the powers granted . to the Board pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws , Chapter 40A, and the grant of the appealed decision was in excess the Board pursuant to of the powers granted to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. - 4 - WHEREFORE, your plaintiffs hereby request that this Court grant the following relief : 1 . That the Court rule that the decision of the Defendant Board . granting the variances is in excess of the powers granted to the Board by M.G. L. , Chapter 40A. 2 . That this Court rule that the decision of the defendant Board should be annulled. 3 . That this Court grant such other and further relief that this Court may deem proper under the circumstances . Esther M. Sa tangelo Anna Perrone . J 5 Prescott Street 102 Margin Street Salem, MA 01970 Salem MA 01970 Tel . ( 408 ) 745-4544 Tel. �— Ul a�t�� Je ie Laverty 26 ' oring Ave. Salem, MA 01970 Tel . ( 508 ) 744-4402 5 - CIU of �M rnt, fflMszar4usefts (O#fire of t1jr Cn'rk (til erk I � •CUNOIT .yy A a OIL,(91,A mite X"11 x m a April 10 , 1989 Mr. John L. O' Brien Registrar of Deeds Federal Street Salem, Mass . 01970 Dear Mr. O' Brien: I, Josephine R. Fusco, upon oath depose and say that: 1. The attached copy of decision was received by this office from the Salem Board of Appeal on February 6 , 1989 . 2 . That notice of an APPEAL pursuant to G.L.c40A S17 was received by this office on February 27 , 1989 . 3 . That although February 27 , 1989 was the 21st day after receipt by this office of the attached copy of decision from the Board of Appeal, I have reason to believe the receipt of notice of the Appeal re- ceived by this office on February 27 , 1989 to be within the statutory time because G.L.c4 S9 pro- vides that when the last day for the performance falls on a Sunday, the act may be performed on the next succeeding business day. As February 26 , 1989 was on the 20th day after my office received the attached copy of decision and also a Sunday, I be- lieve receipt of notice of the Appeal in this case on February 27 , 1989 by this office to be in com- pliance with the statutory time for filing notice of appeals with this office. This certificate is intended to clarify the March 14 , 1989 Certification by me on the attached copy of decision which is recorded in Essex South District Registry of Deeds Book 9925 , Page 139 . Very truly yours , JOSEPHINE R. FUSCO William H. Munroe 96 Margin Street Salem, Massachusetts 01970 January 25, 1989 James M. Fleming, Chairman Zoning Board of Appeal One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 RE: 98 Margin Street Dear Mr. Fleming: I have been asked to contact you on behalf of my mother-law Margaret DeFrancesco, owner of property at 96 Margin Street. She resides at that address, as do I and my family. Mrs. DeFrancesco is presently confined to the hospital and neither she nor I are able to attend your meeting. The facts in this matter are quite clear and are as follows: 1 . There is not now, nor has there ever been, a building permit issued for the structure. 2. There is nothing unusal about the soil conditions, shape, or topography of the lot in question. It is a flat, almost rectangular lot with no special soil conditions. Any financial hardship has been self inposed by the erection of the structure without benefit of the necessary permits. I would remind the Board that unless ALL the statutory findings are met the Variance cannot be granted. 3. The fence resting atop the deck exceeds the height permitted in Table I of the residential density regulation in an R-3 zone by approximatel three (3) feet. To erect this structure without permits, knowing full well that the Building Inspector lives next door is the ultimate of disrespect for the laws and ordinances of the City of Salem and an insult to me and the Building Department. I am sure that after considering the facts the Board will vote to deny the Variance and order the structure removed. Sincerely, William H. Munroe of �$Ufftp / (Office of the Cgxtu Clerk 'Co ID - ;�Jaseyhine}Z. ilscn _ Yivum i Q:itq lElez6 i� d Quo Mall A ' April 10 , 1989 Mr . John L. O 'Brien Registrar of Deeds Federal Street Salem, Mass . 01970 7 Dear Mr . O ' Brien: I , Josephine R. Fusco, upon oath depose and say that: 1 . The attached copy of decision was received by this office from the Salem Board of Appeal on February 6 , 1989 . 2 . That notice of an APPEAL pursuant to G.L.c40A S17 was received by this office on February 27 , 1989 . 3 . That although February 27 , 1989 was the 21st day after receipt by this office of the attached copy of decision from the Board of Appeal, I have reason c to believe the receipt of notice of the Appeal re- C= ceived by this office on February 27 , 1989 to be within the statutory time because G.L. c4 S9 pro- w vides that when the last day for the performance rn falls on a Sunday, the act may be performed .on the next succeeding business day. As February 26 , 1989 was on the 20th day after my office received the attached copy of decision and also a Sunday, I be- lieve receipt of notice of the Appeal in this case on February 27, 1989 by this office to be in com- pliance with the statutory time for filing notice of appeals with this office. This certificate is intended to clarify the March 14 , 1989 Certification by me on the attached copy of decision which is recorded in Essex South District Registry of Deeds Book 9925 , Page 139 . Very truly yours , RETERENCE REQQ7S- i ^�QI{ ._PAGV./ 'JOSEPHINE R. FUSCO o'si009953 X83 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS FEB 11 2 s9 Fh '89 ESSEX, SS. TRIAL COURT DEPT. OF THIFUM$ERIOR COURT CASE 913Yrg�,�uc9WEw•hir.SS. ANNA PERRONE, ESTHER M. ) SANTANGELO AND JENNIE ) LAVERTY, ) PLAINTIFFS ) APPEAL UNDER THE V. ) PROVISIONS M.G.L. , CHAPTER 40A, SECTION GIOVANNA QUARTERONE AND ) 17 , AS AMENDED, FROM A JAMES M_ FLEMING, RICHARD ) DECISION OF THE BOARD BENCAL, JOHN NUTTING, ) OF APPEAL OF THE CITY PETER STROUT AND ARTHUR ) OF SALEM LEBRECQUE AS THEY COMPRISE) THE BOARD OF APPEAL OF THE) CITY OF SALEM ) ' The Plaintiffs evoke the provisions of M.G . L. Chapter 40A, Section 17 , as amended, and respectfully represent as follows : 1 . That the Plaintiffs are as follows : (a ) Anna Perrone, the owner of land at 5 Prescott Street, Salem Massachusetts ; (b) Esther M. Santangelo, the co-owner of land at 102 Margin Street, Salem, Massachusetts ; and ( c ) Jennie Laverty, the co-owner of land:' at 102 Margin Street, Salem, Massachusetts. 2 . That the Defendant, Giovanna Quartarone , is the owner of the property located at 98 Margin Street , Salem, Massachusetts . (the "Premises" ) . t ..`%-,QINAL REFERENCE REQUESTED GOOK PAGE MO 9958, ' 484 3 . That the Defendants , James M. Fleming, Richard Bencal , John Nutting, Peter Strout and Arthur Lebrecque were at the time the Application of Giovanna Quaterone as hereinafter described, members of and did .constitute the Board of Appeal . of the City of Salem; and that said Defendants at the time of the Application of the Defendant, Giovanna Quarterone, was approved as. hereinafter described did act upon said Application . The Defendants reside as follows : James M. Fleming Arthur Lebrecque 47 Buffum Streeet 11 Hazel Street Salem, MA 01970 Salem, MA 01970 John Nutting Peter Strout 68 Moffat Road 244 Lafayette St. Salem, MA 01970 Salem, MA 01970 Richard Bencal 19 Goodell Ave . Salem, MA 01970 4 . That by application dated November 21, .1988 and filed December 1 , 1968, the Defendant,. Giovanna Quarterone , applied to the Board of Appeal of the City of Salem for variances from the City of Salem Zoning Ordinance to allow the existing deck and fence to remain at the property located at 98 Margin Street , Salem, Massachusetts . Her application included the following requests : - 2 - BKa09958 . jlu 85 1 - A variance to permit the continued use of a deck in violation of density regulations set out in Section VI of the Salem Zoning Ordinance . 2 . A variance to permit the continued use of a fence in viol.ation of the height requirements set out in Section VI of the Salem Zoning ordi- nance . A copy of this Application is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" . 5 . That a public hearing was held on this Application on January 25 , 1989 , at which time the Board voted four ( 4 ) in favor, and one ( 1) opposed , to grant the variance to allow the existing fence as requested and voted five ( 5 ) in favor and no ( 0 ) opposedto grant the variance to allow the existing deck as requested. A copy of that decision attested to by the City Clerk is attached hereto as Exhibit 6 . That the above decisions of the Defendant Board is in excess of the powers granted to the members of the Board by M.G.L. , Chapter 40A, Section 10 . 7 . That for all times relevant to the Application and decision, the Plaintiffs were the owners of the property which directly abuts the "Premises„ and are parties in interest as set forth in Massachusetts 3 - C 009958r ?.� 86 General Law c. 40A §11 , and persons aggrieved by a decision of the Defendant Board, in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 40A, Section 17 . 9 . That in granting the requested relief the Defendant Board did not make specific findings as to the statutory prerequisites for the granting of a variance pursuant. to Massachusetts General Laws c . 40A §10 . 10 . That there would not be a substantial hardship to the Defendant, Giovanna Quaterone, to use the "Premises" for those purposes set forth in the Salem Zoning Ordinance . 11 . That the use of the "Premises" as requested would be a substantial detriment to the public good and would derogate from the purpose and intent of the Salem Zoning Ordinance. 12 . That the failure of the Defendant Board to make specific findings as to the existence of the statutory prerequisites for determining a variance was in excess of the powers granted . to the Board pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws , Chapter 40A, and the grant of the appealed decision was in I excess of the powers granted to the Board pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. 4 - 3K00995a j487 WHEREFORE, your plaintiffs hereby request that this Court grant the following relief : 1 . That the Court rule that the decision of the Defendant Board . granting the variances is in excess of the powers granted to the Board by M.G.L. , Chapter 40A. 2 . That this Court rule that the decision of the defendant Board should be annulled. 3 . That this Court grant such other and further er relief that this Court may deem proper the circumstances . Anna Perrone Esther M. Sa tangelo l 5 Prescott Street 102 Margin Street Salem, MA 01970 Salem MA 01970 Tel . ( 408 ) 745-4544 Tel. Je ie Laverty — 26 ' oring Ave. Salem, MA 01970 Tel . ( 508 ) 744-4402 5 - 81009925PG l 3g Fee 6 3 01Y11 '89 8K 0 a 9 9 5 8 i 9G (gitg of �$ttlem, Massar4usetfi"' / p CITY CLFR1'..0E;-' 'M. WASS. vara of �}r}iettl DECISION ON THE PETITION OF GIOVANNA OUARTERONE FOR VARIANCE AT 98 MARGIN STREET Ww-3) A hearing on this petition was held January 25, 1989 with the following Board Members present: James Fleming, Chairman; Messrs. , Bencal, Nutting, Strout and Associate LaBrecque. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioner, owner of the property is requesting Variances to allow the existing deck and fence to remain in this R-3 district. a a- z The Variances which have been requested may be granted upon a finding of the Board that: Cn -a a. special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land,$ building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other N lands, buildings and structures in the same district; b. literal enforcement of the provisions. of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner; c. desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. 0 The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented, ands after viewing the plan of land, makes the following findings of fact: ta? 0 1 . Fence and deck are needed for privacy; w 2. Topography of the land makes in unfeasible to locate the deck on any other part of the lot. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1 . Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property but not the district generally; 2: - Literal enforcement of the Ordinance would work a substantial hardship on the petitioner; 3. The relief requested can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially ,derogating from the intent of the district of the purpose of the Ordinance. ' DECISION ON THE PETITION OF GIOVANNA OUAHTERONE FOR A VARIANCE FOR 98 MARGIN STREET, SALEM HO 0 9 9 5 8 '648 9 page two 1 Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted, 4-1 , to grant the variance to allow the existing fence as requested. Mr. Bencal voted in opposition. The Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the variance to allow the existing deck as requested. VARIANCES GRANTED Peter Strout, Member, Board of Appeal A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK APPEAL FROM THIS DECISION. IF ANY. SHALL BE MADE PURSUANT TO SECTION 17 OF THE 11P.''.". GL14ERAL LAWS. CHAPTER 808. AND SHALL BE FILED WITIIIN 20 DAYS AFTER THE DATE OF FILINr. OF THIS DECISION iH THE OFFICE OF THE CIN MASSSECTION 11. THE VARIANCE OR SPECIAL PEC!ilT PURSANT TO . CEIIERAL LAWS. CHAPTER 908• GRANTED HEREIN. SHALL NOT TARE EFFECT UNTIL A COPY OF,INOEDISIn-1. BEAP"; THE C7 No APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED. FCATC:N OF 111E C,',Y CLERK-WAY 20 DAYS HAVE ELAPSED GR THAT. IF SUCH A'I APPEAL HAS BEEN FILE. THAT IT HAS BEEN DW-ASSED OR DaiiEO IS U=P.DEU IN THE SC:UTH ESSEEXXOR�TFA OOFTHEEDS AND OYiNE1lS CDERTIFICATE OF nTLE.UNDER THE �E THE 0':(NE^. DE OF KCM OR is RFCAYD£D - ROARY OF APFEAIL Dote MAR 14 1989 I hereby certify that .2Q 1;p ' 1. have expired frcn the do°0 t:necju¢frtii6,9uVA received, cnd that NU in this ' A True �.!'�"^"�re Co "` e ATTEST: ass. ?� :'•F.'e'"'fi. -.:x:.�wr+'E:br.�fi. —' +m•_d�3osuan•tzP^s - =_ ������ ��` ��J �04/� 7ji --� DECK IN VIOLATION . . .._ . z' ' 12,06 6Z0� o �, ; 5,68 � h - - P v N 4.4± I+ t t ASSESSORS '57.45 TO MAP - 48,55 PRESCO MARGIN ST 48,55 J MORTGAGE SURVEY PLANS N0e32�9 /{ R. J. MO HUN. Registered Professional Engineer, Saugus, Mass. (� 7 S M A R G 1 N STREET I hereby certify that the building shown on this plan is Gl O VA N N A 9Ut4 RTA RON E located on the ground as shown and that it conformed to �qqw.: the zoning laws of the City/Town of SALEM I W=20 FT 26-1919 when constructed. Scale: (- _�La+�e: Gt��t 7,tUAVLoiNo: I further certify that this oropertylS� located A"BSE'SSOt':S MAP-P- within a FLOOD HAZARD ZONE as delineated on the On a PUN cy: Date: MAP of: A, t Deed Refwence:BOOK 6597 Page 485 COMMUNITY:26OIO2 AU Da�••ed:���� Plan Reference:PL BK. Pian By the Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Insurance Administration. ESSEX COUNTY SOUTH, REGISTRY OF DEEDS ���,�nF� Property line and street line offsets shown on this plan are �? Ragner 1 specifically for the determination of zoning requirements > MahRn only. v ll I M3 y This plan is derived from tape measurements in the field. It v&1 does not include measurements of angles with a transit. o��shOMALEN �'�+� Offsets are not to be used for fences, walls, etc. .._ . _ - .. _ Signed: • R.E.10153 -.