217-219 LORING AVENUE - VELARDI, JOHN W - ZBA 217-219 Loring Ave. R-1 I
John W. Velardi
s
CITY Ij ? ' ASS,
F.A. Kulik
9 Cleveland Rd.
Salem, MA 01970
Board of Appeals
City of Salem. .
City Hall
Salem, MA 01970 December 24, 1987
Dear Sirs:
It is requested that Mr. John W. Velardi of 217-219 Loring Avenue
be required to immediately comply with the terms of the variance
granted to him by your Board on November 12, 1986. In its
wisdom, the Board required that Mr. Velardi lay crushed stone
throughout the parking area at the rear of his property. In
defiance with this requisite, Mr. Velardi has paved the greater
portion of this area, adversely affecting the drainage characteristics
of, the surrounding area. As a result, I have experienced a water
problem in the basement of my home.
Your prompt attention to this matter is most appreciated.
Very truly yours, y�
F.A. Kulik . � Q'��c--
Copy to:
Building Inspector
Board of Health
p 1 f�1if of S�Irm, �ssttcljuseffs
%nms oT`
FILE ;
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF JOHN W. VELARDI FOR MODIFICq4QN OF., .,
SPECIAL PERMIT & VARIANCE AT 217-219 LORING AVE.
A hearing on this petition was held November 12, 1986 with the following Board
Members present: James Hacker, Chairman; Messrs. , Bencal, Fleming, Luzinski and
Strout. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the
hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with
Massachusetts General Laws Chanter 40A.
Petitioner, owner of the property, is requesting the Board of Appeal to modify
condition number six (6) of the Special Permit & Variance previously granted
April 20, 1983. Said Special Permit & Variance was granted allowing property to
be divided into two dots, Lot 16 containing a three family dwelling and Lot 18
containing a single family dwelling. Property is located in an R-2 .district and
was owned by Kenneth Provencher at the time of the 1983 decision.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented, makes
the following findings of fact:
1 There was no opposition.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented, the
Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1 . The requested modification of condition number six (6) of the
previous decision can be granted without substantial detriment
to the public good.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted four to one, Mr. Hacker voted present,
to grant the requested modification of condition number six to read as follows:
6.. This decision to allow the continued use of the three family dwelling
will be in effect so long as the petitioner, his heirs or assigns
continue to own or reside in the _adjacent single family dwelling (Lot 18)
or so long as the three family dwelling is owner occupied.
All other conditions to remain as previously granted and are as follows:
1 . Petitioner may divide the property into two parcels, one containing
6,220 square feet (lot 18) and'one containing 5,920 square feet (lot 16) ;
2. Petitioner may keep the existing structure.on lot 16 within five (5)
feet of the northernmost property line of lot 18;
3. Petitioner must obtain a Certificate of Occupancy and Use prior to the
recording of the plan submitted to the Board;
4. Petitioner may never build or construct a driveway within sixteen ( 16)
feet of,the northernmost boundary of lot 16;
5• Petitioner must lay crushed stone throughout the parking area at the
rear of the existing three (3) family;
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF JOHN W. VELARDI FOR MODIFICATION OF
SPECIAL PERMIT & VA.RIANCE AT 217-219 LORING AVE. , SALEM i
page two
6. This decision to allow the continued use of the three family dwelling
will be in effect so long as the petitioner, his heirs or assigns
continue to own or reside in the adjacent single family dwelling ( lot 18)
or so long as the three family dwelling is owner occupied;
7 . petitioner must limit parking on lot 16 to three (3) spaces, no such
space to be less than sixteen ( 16) feet from the northernmost boundary
of such lot;
8. Petitioner must landscape the northwest corner of lot 16;
9. Petitioner must obtain a Certificate of Compliance prior to
recording of said plan.
GRANTED
Peter Strout, Member, Board of Appeal
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK
i
SECTIO]! 17 OF
CIEICh. IF A , SHALL EE
6:ACE PUF.SUANDA S AFTER THE Gr.�E OF
p,1 YFIi H!8 ZJ
THIS DE tJ SHALL BE PEfi".ii
CHP.PT`_R SCS'GFFTCE G' THE CITY CLERK.
o £OS. SECTI . 11. THE \hi lGr E C^ n
GE1�CP.AL LA\'.S.
OF TI,� CFDSCI I 7hC r..7ER C .
LA:'_. Ch' CC°� F THECE ' c ED.
L
. CS R � Ef=E'T U;u L A n !' JCC A°f°F. Ht 11
i
C.pg i rC cam. LL i T 2i GA\S "F:E r,.F_ ., fig.n DR - D%GER
CI: E' H r_''' ui IT H+., Cr iHc
flCi."� '; OF THCCi i „�ERi T
GR THAT. IF S'JCH Ali APPEA-
HAS BEEii fIL'c GEECS A'�D IF:9EVE0 Ulan Of TITLE.
ESSEX RIOTED t00FTNE DH'NER'S CEP.TIFICATE
RECORDED IN HE R°CORDt AWD BOARD OF APPEAL
OF RECORD OR