The URL can be used to link to this page

10 LORING AVENUE - KELLEY, WILLIAM & BARBARA - ZBA William Loring Ave. a K Wlliam & BarbarKelley ' C . Ott of Sttiem, kssac4usetts 184 JUL -2 P 3 Paurb of 'tAppeal M! V 77- t)] CISION_ON THE PETITION OF WILLIAM KELLEY FOR A VARIANCE FOR 10 LORING AVE. , SALEM (R-2) A hearing on this petition was held on June 20, 1984 with the following Board Members present: James Hacker, Chairman; Messrs. , Gauthier, Luzinski, Strout and . Associate Member Bencal. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others z and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in o accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. r w j Pett tioner is requesting a Variance from rear yeard setbacks in order to corrtruct an inground pool in this R-2 district. G (7 W N C Z W LL _Th eti Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding of the o j r o o&d that: - o ` a. special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect c the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally ti o affecting other lands, buildings and structures in the same district; O. y.. Z5 Y N G W b. literal enforcement of 'the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would in- volve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to petitioner; and t W H Q J W Z W 1J c. desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the --' C. a o public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating-frem the o _ intent of the district or the purposes of the Ordinance. o - E :E ' W a'he Board of Appeal, after hearing the evidence presented at the hearing and W - z n W aifter viewing plans of the proposed pool makes the following findings of fact: o � z U f, f G } J W = = _ K 1 . No oppositions was presented to the plan; :7 2. Hardship because of need to have 16' width for diving. �)n the basis of the above findings of face and on the evidence presented at the ' ' tearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: - 1 . Literal enforcement of the Ordinance would work a substantial hardship upon the petitioner. 2. The Variance requeste can be granted without substantial detriment to the good of the neighborhood. Therefore the Board of Appeal voted unaimously to grant the petitioner the. Variance requested under the following terms and conditions: 1 . ?ool is to be no closer than; 8' to the building or closer than 4' on side. Peter Strout, Board of Appeal rnr, .,O TUTC nVL TCTOM rant nPPM PTIFn WTTH THF PI.ANNTNG BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK `tliJ r y,Jy i JvG awlAL. I0 w �•�� §A ,`.�� y�� , u< a•D LOT 1 Sohn G 6U1IIemoni- !g5Y'f � Z,{�y"}�ya•�'}N� .'M1F\�an i�^Y� r�>6 y 1" - 7tsWa RETAINING WAL.J!ILL ?�eier L smKat h�r�r eii `��4 v W©0-D F Ncc io4w ;? ice" �r;t �0� A�s;;- s. .0 9« 7a . >S, i. t O 17r inose d • -c V ;)n aa 6� 0 .Shed G�•3 J ;� �{ x ��'s i¢4wx 3 caw R� .(� # +�,X An "• i � 6. »W li a o c Fra.nc(s l� i IZui:h F tons tel, t y A .fib i.r_. V° /00 0 ^y JJ•e {2 OA t4jyGf: 6A In :r l��a'n�'7ean"��.{L,,,✓' y[Y o� [ 9�.3 �'�,Pe'i�y u'� to, maX/,- 1"' tiiGj°R n� w '1 y rXvr . yyy� --��r�.- -71 S C� -- -- - - . . v� -- - - - -Y--4 ,1 .. -- 1 1 w uQ —��-- G� - � ��-��-ham► - -- - - - - - - - -/ - ----C/f CiA - AAO- =-C- - - -_- QonL d 5� � - - _ x .� -- t -•.--�--r--- — �-- _— ; --' l l t ----,--- . ' 1 v � �� ' � 1 f LL / , ' { i � � r , � a - .... � _ � _.,__ j