20 LINDEN STREET - MULLER, LEONARD & CECILE - ZBA 20 LINDEN AVE. (R-1;--
Muller, Leonard & Cecile
Variances granted 10/20/82
C)r-. r-.,: -r:: C5
� ' '82 OCT 22 Xi1 :21UVar,:� ,9f AP)wdI
CITYC' - S OF;C
SA.brdT�lON ON THE PETITION OF
LEONARD AND CECT-, r `CULLER REQUESTING
A VARIANCE FOR 20 LINDEN AVENUE
A hearing on this petition was held on Octobar 20, 1982, with the following
Board Members present: Janes Hacker, Chairsan; Messrs. Piemonte, Hopper and
Feeherry, and Associate Member Luzinski. Notices of the hearing were sent to abutters
and others and a notice of the hearing was published in the Salem Evening News
in accordance with Massachusetts General La-.,,s Chapter 40A.
4.
The Petitioners' have. requested variances for the property at 20 Linden Avenue to
allow the sale of a small portion of the rear of the property. A variance is required
because the proposed changes in the configuration of the property will violate rear
yard setback requirements, lot area requirements and maximum lot coverage requirements.
The Board of Appeal, after consideration of the evidence presented at the public
hearing and after viewing the property makes the following findings of fact:
1) Petitioners` proposed modification of t=:e area of the site will have virtually
no effect on the surrounding area.
2) Petitioners' proposed actions were unoposed by their abutters or neighbors.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and the evidence presented at the public
hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as fellows:
1) The property in question is unique becacse of its peculiar configuration.
2) The conditions described above especially- affect the land in question but do
not generally affect the zoning district in which the land is located.
3) The conditions described above which of-ect the land in question, but not the zoning
district generally cause the following spec-al hardship: unless a variance is granted,
it will be virtually impossible to modify t=_= configuration of the lot.
4) The desired variance may be granted wit:;out substantial detriment to the public good.
Therefore the Board of Appeal unanimously voted in favor of granting the requested
relief. The Board granted a variance to tn_ Petitioners on the following terms:
1) Variances are granted to allow the proposed modification of the lot lines of the
property in question as shown on the s- bmitted t the Board.
Anthony M. Feeh r y, Sec fetary
• A COPY OF THIS DECISION AND PLANS HAVE BEES FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND CITY CLERK
'82 OCT 22 K11 :21
CITY CL" H'`:. II =!CE
Sig,`-='
FP30 Via "75" 77 WYL 01
_ W•. = LO"-i 37 PF THE
.. .. rK GTE jjEVal ..e.3 T __ �r ;lt"ice
r nz - _
pul
'7,
Wass 1. pn � .. _ L
OF REMAU D t .
ta �. _ � wjAIDE7 - . nE O
OF ME
BAD OF APP54C
•
dor f2.9
79 83 S.F. 15/9Z EM / ,#SS_
2.9 679'f S.f- k, SU,B4O/Y/S/ON OF LANO
3 F
t o7 gz.9
qb k.,9 OWNEO BY
/239 S.r X02 JIlerCO A,Rr oo L EoN/9R� ff CEC/4E lvaC L ER
vx
O Z !�/ iPc�i d C'E Lynn f�e/d /yJa.
�IrSLo1+` /982
�
0 20 40 6o so /oo
O
LOT 9/r 42 q\ 3 L ,Oeed .Pcc'd .B.Y So78 PG 338
7250
*`�H OF M-
SF Rc�R\ 'a'9
\ RAL►H
WILLIA c
O
8489.Sf RoucyAvo S. ° = S ceir.Fy tbae el"
0NSF t o
ATE Rf• R
/Oe7 rl/ 7n v Np Ey0 �✓� r'b ` ! I'u/PS f rey .,/d L`ia�1S
sunv of a iV& t` -e
iY�yes a
# .v
i
A o 5
5g
/oo. o0 58. s� R
P.C.
f'ETE/P /?0.90
NOTE : Lot 42B /s to b:
Coir 6iiaco' wc j LoC 4/ E
SALEiYJ �LANN/NG .BOi9/QO : 6aco.� e a.� ..� tl.y .-� / �. rc
�j�O�O/'a V7/ Un dPr L�� ! Su6 dv.J'.c�i of Land of ,Oovc/iaro'.
OdZ'e