24 LEMON STREET - O'KEEFE, WILLIAM & PATRICIA - ZBA 24 Lemon St. (R-2)
C William & Patricia O'Keefe
�J
o _
S
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF WILLTA.M & PATRICIA O'KEEFE
F0= A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 24 LEMON ST. , (R-2)
A hearing on this petition was held May 28, 1986 w} heC^o� t� J3oard Members
present: James Hacker, Chairman; Richard Bencal, ` I tary; Messrs. , Fleming and
Luzins'.ri. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutt. [t .rand others and notices of
the hearing were properly published in the Salem evening News in accordance with
- .
Piassachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. CITY CLF-": c,LF�4"µ,ASS
Petitioners, owners of the property, request a Special Permit to allow an
existing deck in this R-2 district.
The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this request
for a S_•ecial Permit is Section V B 10, which provides as follows:
No-withstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this
Ordinance, the Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the
procedure and conditions set forth in Section VIII F and IX D,
grant Special Permits for alterations and reconstruction of
no_^.conforming structures, and for changes, enlargement, extension
or expansion of nonconforming lots, land, structures, and uses,
provided, however, that such change, extension, enlargement or
expansion shall not be substantially more detrimental than the
ex-'.sting nonconforming use to the neighborhood.
In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit reouests,
guided ty the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted upon a finding
by the hoard that the grant of the Special Permit will promote the public health,
safety, convenience and welfare of the City'.s inhabitants.
The Board of Appeal, after considering tie evidence presented at the hearing, and
after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact:
1 . No support or opposition was voiced at the hearing;
2. The deck in question was built approximately twenty (20)
years ago.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the
%;oaring, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1 . The relief requested may be granted without substantial
detriment to the public good;
2. The proposed use will promote the health, safety, convenience
and welfare of the City's inhabitants.
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF WILLIAM & PATRICIA O'KEEFE
I
FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT FOR 24 LEMON ST. , SALEM
nage two
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 4-0, in favor of granting
the Special Permit requested, subject to the following conditions:
1 . The 16' x 20' deck as shown on the plans submitted must be
on one floor only and be no closer than 7' in the rear, and
3' on the side facing lot x'45;
2. All regulations of the Salem Fire Department relative to
the installation of smoke detectors must be 'met.
SPECIAL PERMIT GRANTED
Richard A. Benca]., Secretary
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK
;RADE PCP.SUANT TO SE TIO-I 17 OF TtlE •.:;5
AF?EAL FRO`•1 THIS DECISIOR• IF t:"Y, SHALL HF •41!J 20 DAYS A:IcR
THE DATE OF FP-_-_:_,G
E^3 4 D Cdr L F _u 11
nL LA'!:S C TY CI ER 4. C Si . _.IIT
crr ' of Ir
C= If,EC.S I. \ I.
R.
HIS _
[ `ZD ° n`
D> a OF
S. IF i '.Pi - N RE'frD G i`
CR Dc
nwCnUEp I! IHS S :iH ESnE FF� ,SI _�- 01, ,ERS CER i1 rIC ..t OF TIAL`.
DF RECORO OR IS RECURRED Alip CvGitD Ci Ir.c BOARD OF AFP=AL
MORTGAGE INSPECTION
BAY STATE SURVEYING SERVICE INC.
234 CABOT ST., BEVERLY, MA.
LOCATION j
ASNOTES i
SALI._.M .................
SCALE a I° =20 FT. DATE +_ ,} ]-Z I ��fi�, • This is a Mortgage inspection survey and not
REFERENCE .�. X. Q`, an instrument survey,therefore this plot plan is for
mortgage inspection purposes only.
F?Alq _ Ip • This survey is based on survey marks of
others.
To ShPW S`�1VT_�aP,Nl�QF�zQS�Q_N.NA, • Bushes,shrubs, fences and tree lines do
I hereby certify that I have examined the premises and that the not necessarily indicate property lines.
building(s) shown on this plan are located on the ground as
shown and that they conformed to the zoning setbacks of the • The building(s) are not located in the special
flood hazard zone, as detlned by H.U.-D.when constructed.
I
I
II
- ger
te �G
H6.67 -
DSK
4
I
eEA-'4664
1
L E•t�ov S 77-
Kc)TF—
-.NOTE %a or
DECK DOES NOT I
CSJM�L�( W ITN —LOh INQ0 3 iJA y
BY�WS O� C IT p ,SOT 0S
I„M Y r No. 6094 QQ
Af-/SILO
004''41 LAO SO