Loading...
6 LANGDON STREET - SANTOS, EDWARD J - ZBA 6 Langdon St. Edward J. Santos R-7� IV ��C 6 Langdon St. Edward J. R-1 Santos .Ir ( its of $alem, Cfussarhuseft 17 2 59 PM '88 j fFILET' PnarD of Ap}tenl b,.oms uJ" CITY DECISION ON THE PETITION OF EDWARD J. SANTOS FOR A VARIANCE AT 6 LANGDON STREET (R-1 ) A hearing on this petition was held August 24, 1988 with the following Board Members present: James Fleming, Chairman; Messrs. , Luzinski, Strout and Associates Dore and Labrecque. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter '40A. The petitioner, owner of the property, is requesting a Variance from setback and density requirements to allow construction of a deck and stairs in this R-1 zone. The Variance which has been granted may be granted upon a finding of the Board that: a. special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings and structures in the same district; b. literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner, c. desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. • The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: I . Mr. Freeman, 8 Langdon Street, spoke in favor; 2. The petitioner/owner, stated he would like to replace old rotten stairs and build a 4' x 6' x 12' deck and relocate stairs to the front. Due to a safety factor of vehicles frequently turning and backing up in his driveway, he is fearful of occupants safety; 3. Mrs. Gwendolyn Melanson, 4 Langdon St. , spoke in opposition. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1 . Special conditions exist which especially affects the subject property but not the district generally; 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship to the petitioner; 3. The relief requested can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating fromthe intent of district or the purpose of the ordinance. DECISION ON THE PETITION OF EDWARD J. SANTOS FOR A VARIANCE AT 6 LANGDON STREET, SALEM page two Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the Variance requested, subject to the following conditions: 1 . All rquirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to fire safety be adhered to; 2. A legal building permit be obtained; 3. Petitioner conform with all regulations of the Massachusetts State Building Code; 4. Construction be as per plan submitted. VARIANCE GRANTED //John R. Secqetary A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK APP-AL FROM THIS DECISION. i; ANY. SHALL BE MADE PURSUANT TO SEr71C*+ 17 OF TP' GEN'LRAL LAWS. C44PTLR 303, ASD SH:.LI. BE TO ED WITHIN 20 DAYS AF7 P 'HE PA-E u, CF THIS DECISIpr; IN TH' O=-;._r OF p;= CITY CLERfi. P';-S',' I T( GR3cC r (c ;`- l I �. C AP"ER SD3, 11. THE V'P,y:__ I R SH .LL N.'. it r nEdi L".Ti! F 0,7f CF THE S Fl. ,r.t T, Dr ,HE 1. I CHEF. . - I - L ATS ri [ 'PSE? A 'J N' A L GR THAT IF SJCH AN APPEn_ HAS E —N RLE iHA. iT H�.s LEEI, CSS Ic 1 I, DE P,ECSRDED IN THE SOUTH ESSEX RE,ISTRY OF O:EDS AND INDEXED UNOFR Thi OF RECORD OR IS RECORDED AND NOTED ON THE OWNER'S CERTIFICATE Oi TALE BOARD OF APPEAL CARTER & TOWERS ENGINEERING CORP. 6 FAIRVIEW AVENUE Joseph D Carter SWAMPSCOTT, MASS 01907 Professional Engineer Tel. 592-8386 Registered Land Surveyor i i At gM„(6t�eo E IY! 7-y'x4• rr 10,1i)ragr t ee To the CES r8" ra"N%N9 and�?� 71 —Z . 1 yz"Nw�hJJArL,Py 5UiXhei)Di,cj-1z5.0._ yt I hereb certify that I have examined _a_:x:.�.�_.:...;, -.� -'� �'N_:_.��?_;_ p.�...N_� _ k�i�., k .::.� __' S�;. _•.-.torr- 50'- -y' err °,,`x q o o ,- the premises and all easements; encroachments and buildings are / located on the ground as shown. �j further certify that the buildings shown conformed to the zoning laws of f� A�4U when constructed. I further certify that this,property DAVID /J meted in 3 GARTER est bl ed flood riL y <r STQV o lC,46z 4p, ose D. Carter R.l . #9387, pp ' ISPOSAL DESIGNS SURi SEWAG VL I� NEERING RCOLATION TESTS