332 LAFAYETTE STREET - GOUTZOS, LOUIS - ZBA 332 Lafayette St. (R-2)
Louis Goutzos
•z f�it� �f ��Iem, � �sstttl�use�ts
-r jd
oara of rzd
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF LOUIS GOUTZOS FOR A SPECIAL
PERMIT FOR 332 LAFA.YETTE ST. , SALEM
A hearing on this petition was held June 26, 1985 with the following Board Members
present: Edward Luzinski, Acting Chairman; Messrs. , Charnas, Gauthier, Strout and
Associate Member Bencal. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others
and notices of the hearing were properly publishedn the Salem Evening News in
accordance with Massachusetts General Law Chapter 40A.
Petitioner, owner of the premises requests a Special Permit to construct an
addition in the rear of the premises in order to expand his photography business
in this R-2 district.
The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is aiplicable to this request
for a Special Permit is Section V B 11 , which provides as follows:
n T r
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearin3
in this Ordinance, the Board of Appeal may, ie_ —
accordance with the procedure and conditions set
forth in Section VIII F and IX D, grant Special Permil3
for alterations and reconstruction of nonconforming ,.
structures, and for changes, enlargement, extt�sion oro
expansion of nonconforming lots, land, structures,
and uses, provided, however, that such changey',extens:�=n,
enlargement or expansion shall not be substantially more
detrimental than the existing nonconforming use to the
neighborhood.
In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit requests,
raided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted upon a finding
by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will promote the public health, )
safety , convenience and welfare of the City' s inhabitants.
The Board of Appeal, after hearing the evidence and viewing the plans, makes
the following findings of _`act:
1 . No opposition was presented to the plan;
2. The proposal will have no significant affect of the neighborhood
or on the abutters.
On the basis of the evidence presented at the hearing, and on the above findings
of fact, the Board 'concludes as follows:
1 . The proposed addition will not be substantially more detrimental
to the public good than the existing premises;
2. The proposed addition is in harmony with the Salem Zoning Ordinance.
q ♦f
^DECISION ON THE PETITION OF LOUIS GOUTZOS FOR A
SPECIAL PERMIT FOR 332 LAFAYETTE ST. , SALEM,
page two
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously 5-0 to grant the
requested Special Permit, provided that:
1 . The addition be designed to blend architecturally with surrounding
buildings;
2. The ridge line at the top of the addition be no more than one ( 1 )
foot higher than the existing dwellings ridge line;
3. A Certificate of Occupancy be obtained.
SPECIAL PERMIT GRANTED
Scott E. Charnas, Secretary
V
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK
APPEAL FROL1 THIS DECISION. IF ANY. SHALL BE MADE PURSUANT TO SECTION 17 OF OF THE NESS.
FILING
GENERAL LAV7S. CHAPTER BOB. AND SHALL BE FILED WITHIN 20 DAYS AFTER THE DATE
OF THIS DECISION IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK.
PURSANi TO I]ASS SHALL IFOi LAWS, EFFECT CNAFTER 87 L•A C PY SECTION
CF ITHE'JECI RJ::,CEEo`:N FETHE ERTCIAI '•R
GRANTED HEFd";.
FICAi C':: OF THE Cil"i CIER,. THAI 20 DAYS HAVE ELAPSE'u All N:L C=Pc 'r DH` E' ,._F1'ISD.
OR TH6T, IF SO:"-*' AN =.PPEAL HRJ BEEN TILE. ihH AT IT H4E ETEC c
f,EC rOED lif THE Sl';iH ESSEX REGISTRY OF D`_EDS '!dD INDEXED UNDER THE NA:fE OF THE CVfNER
0% RECORD OR IS RECORDED AND NOTED ON THE OWNER'S CERTIFICATE OF TITLE..
Ld, BOARD OF APPEAL
g 2
m LL
u'I w
CV
Y
Q
� tJ
y
J Id7 }
� J I—
� u'
i
Lo-T 2 5
So
N
r
N
• � Sro�Y � iz�T 2 f - - �
6 2` -
`5�2
-Ponces
Lb -T.-' E ST21�7ET-
O_17T�
�65-Z LAFAYETTE5TPF-LT, SALEM MA5501970 _
I
___--
;.
' i �'f i
.�. � !
a. . �( �. T
r
ji,' {
:.. I
v, -.--�-=• �'^"`�-==�r��=tom,„=-`.
v e
Q,
I&jrrt:cmCrOTirYTF'.+> iGFAv![t-S
.A :! CX:?D NAZAAD
r.Li- tNtiF.0 C`N TNI* MAP
r_
SAuErt r ASS.
9'T Ftl,' DFPa2TM:JJT r-rr.: f4OW,ING
21,1. 1-C':t�ME^tT-t6DERAL --
v,_-l'r:,�.N�E nCtifN;;Tf2R.TiON.
C
LoT zs-
8
Q �
<
I Lo-r 3 Z I
{ Rec.-4 7 o sF... '
I 1
I
7 � _
f
o
(Y, t i
t � Y
V2.S 4p
LAFAYET7E SrRFr-r
MORTGAGE 5URV Y �.
DONALD 5• FOX- REGISTERED LA SURVEYOR
SuNseT RoRo - CARLISLE, MR55.
Sv��M / J/rss Ih¢ ¢by Certl i t uftha-buildinq shown
L0CAT10N: _ _____ _ �--____ -- --- onthi5 Ian iS )ocataJ ,�nth,a round (a_S
,SCALE : 1'� = 20; DFiTE : Oc�r�°�R �' �Y-�.�-- Shown and that Aconformstoth¢ zoning g
laws of7f City /'Fr�.rn of: @
LAf4 REFERENCE :
Being Lot— —3 -2- --- on a pian by -
rrYH wnen
Ta`t¢d �1E��`/QcK hre� and r¢eord¢d in SIN [ al
County = _ °. _ sK nt
RQc315try of DQ.(z.dS.
P ---
Vol
1.,430 o
This plot pfan was not made
! from en instrument survey and
N o YE:
is for ti:,a use of the twnk oniy, "I
GropQrtyy IIn2 Ond SiraQ� iir�¢ e �"S2ti5 Under ne cireulnst mes; aro Wsatu
sf)o-,Nn on thl.s plgn qr¢ foir the to ee used for estahht,hrnent of ` Y
clatarminaCon O"t LUI11ru" r!L< Ulr2nn tLn' ons .
j � j tartcna, wells, iH ilgas, eke. M. $.
' _._ ------- i
l
... _ . . _ __ .. r=-
Y � r � .� _
'�
I
i
iT!
�� i�
1