26-28 CROWDIS STREET - VERRETTE, GERARD & ELAINE - ZBA ._
26-28 Crowdis St. R-1
Gerard & Elaine Verrette
.of
1
J
x�
,, OWI
(�itg of $alem, flttssttrlluse is
pourb of
PETITION OF GERALD AND ELAINE VERRETTE FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT
FOR 26-28 CROWDIS STREET, SALEM
A Public Hearing on this petition was held August 14, 1985 with the following
Board Members present: James Hacker, Chairman; Messrs, Charnas, Gauthier,
Luzinski and Strout. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and
notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in
accordance with Massachusetts General Law Chapter 40A.
Petitioners request a Special Permit to allow them to construct a garage
which would not conform to side and rear setback requirements. The
premises, owned by petitioners, is in an R-1 district and is already noncon-
forming.
The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this
request f m a Spe Vial Permit is Section V B 10, which provides as follows;
Q
Notwithstt�ling a;g thing to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the
Board of Appeal mV, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set forth
in Section-rt III Fund Ix C, grant Special Permits for alterations and recon-
struction i nonconforming structures, and for changes, enlargement, extension or
expansion19 nonco-hforming lots, land, structures, and uses, provided, however,
that such r-_hanLte, Lextension, enlargement or expansion shall not be substantially
more detri�nttl than the existing nonconforming use to the neighborhood.
c iz Z;
In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit requests,
guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted upon a finding
by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit willpromote the public health,
safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants.
The Board of Appeal, after hearing the evidence presented at the hearing
and viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact:
1 . No opposition was presented to the plans;
2. The propsed addition would have no substantial effect on the
neighbors or neighborhood.
On the basis of the above findings of fact and on the evidence presented
at the hearing, the Board concludes as follows:
1 . The petition can be granted without disjecting from the intent and
purpose of the Ordinance;
2. The proposed addition will not be substantially more detrimental
at
w;J
PETITION OF GERALD AND ELAINE VERRETTE FOR A SPECIAL PAGE 2
PERMIT FOR 26-28 CROWDIS STREET, SALEM.
to the public good than the current structure.
Therefore, the Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the
relief requested, provided that:
1 . The proposed garage be attached in some manner to the
existing dwelling;
2. A Certificate of Occupancy be obtained.
Cott E. Charnas, Secretary
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND CITY CLERK
THE k rn
-11 I Tr Sr[TIO TI � c O I !u
P nF.„t cps
(.F Ll ..Ir 0 .• -L V
h I �^ ;:: 7-_- ,,,�- E '-1 IH. 0..'cn 5 ✓:nUFIuA,t Lr 711 LE.
OF RGWRD OR 1S FwOY.uEO A.O 1' I'J uBOARD OF APPLAI
ti
ofPsarb of
peal
��IPTtt, �'�tI55ttt�1TSPttS
` .
�UTT,R~
PETITION OF GERALD AND ELAINE VERRETTE FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT
FOR 26-28 CROWDIS STREET, SALEM
A Public Hearing on this petition was held August 14, 1985 with the following
Board Members present: James Hacker, Chairman; Messrs, Charnas, Gauthier, ,
Luzinski and Strout. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and
notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in
accordance with Massachusetts General Law Chapter 40A.
Petitioners request a Special Permit to allow them to construct a garage
which would not conform to side and rear setback requirements. The
premises, owned by petitioners, is in an R-1 district and is already noncon-
forming. e
The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this
request f m a Spe ti al Permit is Section V B 10, which provides as follows;
c
NotwithstZ�- ing a4 thing to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the
Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set forth
in Sectionr'VIII F,and IX C, grant Special Permits for alterations and recon-
structionEP7 nonconforming structures, and for changes, enlargement, extension or
expansion, nonca: fo=. ,ing lots, land, structures, and uses, provided, however,
that such R han�e, Zextension, enlargement or expansion shall not be substantially
more detrik�!ntl Oan the existing nonconforming use to the neighborhood.
C � U
In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit requests,
guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted upon a finding
by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit willpromote the public health,
safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants.
The Board of Appeal, after hearing the evidence presented at the hearing
and viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact:
1 . No opposition was presented to the plans;
2. The propsed addition would have no substantial effect on the
neighbors or neighborhood.
On the basis of the above findings of fact and on the evidence presented
at the hearing, the Board concludes as follows:
1 . The petition can be granted without disjecting from the intent and
purpose of the Ordinance;
2. The proposed addition will not be substantially more detrimental
PETITION OF GERALD AND ELAINE VERRETTE FOR A SPECIAL PAGE 2
PERMIT FOR 26-28 CROWDIS STREET, SALEM.
to the public good than the current structure.
Therefore, the Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the
relief requested, provided that:
1 . The proposed garage be attached in some manner to the
existing dwelling;
2. A Certificate of Occupancy be obtained.
-Scott E. Charnas, Secretary
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND CITY CLERK
T�Ic T - ..
w PE - _ c .... _
� ..
. . . .. .. ' ' 1... a . . •
. I
.ER 5 pn11RCE;;E Lr 711 LE.
R
OF RECuRD OR h RcwRUEG ' BOARD OF APPEAL