2 CRESCENT DRIVE - CORRIVEAU, BRYAN - ZBA F2 Crescent Drive R-1
Bryan Corriveau
Q
v
Ctq of ttlem, ttssttcljusetts
3 8 42 RN B6
POxrb Of �p} vd OCT r
� • ,�T i1:E
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF BRYAN CORRIVEAU FOR A CITY ^_E
VARIANCE AT 2 CRESCENT DRIVE
A hearing on this petition was held September 24, 1986 with the following Board
Members present: James Hacker, Chairman; Messrs. , Bencal, Fleming, Lusinski and
Strout. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the
hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with
Massachusetts General Law Chapter 40A.
Petitioner, owner of the property, is requesting a Variance to allow an existing
shed which encroaches on side line requirements and distance to main building in
this R-1 district.
The Variance whijh has been requested may be granted upon a finding of the
Board that:
a. special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect
the land, building, or structure involved and which are not generally
affecting other lands, buildings or structures in the same district;
b. literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve
substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner; and
c. desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the
hearing,makes the following findings of fact:
1 . No opposition was presented;
2. The layout of the land presents a problem placing the shed in any
other area of the lot.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the
hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1 . Special conditions exist which especially affect the property in question
but do not affect other lands in the same district;
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Ordinance would involve a
substantial hardship to the petitioner;
3. The relief requested can be granted without substantial detriment or
without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the
district of the purpose of the Ordinance.
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF BRYAN CORRIVEAU FOR A
VARIANCE AT 2 CRESCENT DRIVE, SALEM
page two
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the Variance
requested, subject to the following conditions:
1 . Shed remain located as per the plans submitted;
2. A Certificate of Compliance be obtained from the Salem Fire
Department relative to the installation of smoke detectors.
VARIANCE GRANTED
Peter Strout, Member, Board of Appeal
A COPY.OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK
APPEAL FP.D^ THIS DECISION, IF ANY, SHALL BE MADE PURSUANT TO SECTION 17 OF THE !"AFS.
UrLA;.S. CH;.—,R S'CF. AND SHALL BE FILED VP.h:N '_D DAYS AFTER THE DATE OF FILING
OF THIS DECISION IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLEF.K.
7, VASS. GETERAL LAWS. CHAPTER SOS, SEC1i_'i: 11, Tur V 0:-W:CE OP. SPECIA'_ PER":'JT
r^ cp- - C:- �, °:=.F.:;,� THE CEU-
• FP;:{I ED !iE iEl!i. SH:.L_ NOT TA .E E EC7 UNT1 P. CC:'i C. THE C_
FICAT:0;: OF THE GP=,.L HIEE ! I D,TH" EE
OR THAT. r SUCH AN APPEPL HAS ISE5 FILE. THAT. IT ti° BEE DSED OP. - D IS
RECORD:, 1% THE S_U7H ECSEX P.!-.;STRY OF DEEDS FLD I :--D : DER THE N,. OF THE OWNER
• OF RECORD OR IS RETARDED AND NOTED ON THE G:i NER'S CERTIFICATE OF TITLE.
BOARD OF APPEAL