COLONIAL ROAD LOT 118 - ZBA ire
J �
),Z�k
i
i
j j e-
�/
��
I
1
Ali
�LiIt T of "'5- alrm' C tI85tIt 1ISPtfB
Poarb of '�i�eul
�T
DEC PF"RP
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF HAMBLET & HAYES FOR is�L ;
VARIANCE FOR LOT 118 COLONIAL ROAD
A hearing on this petition was held November 19, 1986 with the following Board
Members present: James Hacker, Chairman; Messrs. , Bencal, Fleming, Strout and
Associate Member Dore. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and
notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in
accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioners, owners of the property, are requesting a Variance from minimum front .
setback to allow construction of an, empty drum storage shed in this Industrial,Zone.
The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding of the
Board that:
a. special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect
the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally
affecting other lands, buildings or 'structures in the same district;
b. literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve
substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner; and
c. desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the
hearing; and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact:
1 . No opposition was voiced to the plan;
2. The problems expressed,as to odors, would not be increased because the
drums stored are to be empty, new and only for the use of solvents to
be directly shipped after filled.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the
hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1 . Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property
but not the district generally;
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would
involve substantial hardship to the petitioner;
3. The relief requested can be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF. HAMBLET & HAYES FOR A
VARIANCE .FGR LOT 118 COLONIAL ROAD, SALEM
page two
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the
Variance from minimum front yard setback requirements to allow front yard depth of
ten (10) feet for the construction of an empty drum storage shed, subject to the
following terms and conditions:
1 . Empty drum storage shed is to be constructed in accordance with
the plans submitted to the Board;
2. All drums stored in the facility shall be new and contain no
inner matter;
3. Construction shall comply with Massachusetts State Building Code and
Salem Fire Prevention Code;
4. A Building Permit must be obtained.
VARIANCE GRANTED
Peter Strout, Member Board of Appeal
A COPY OF THIS DECISION' HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK
_ Ac7rAL F'r,G TBIS DEC'SDP 54.11-BE"t,AOE PURSUANT To SECTION ll OF THE h: = - .
crt cus $ti.LI E_ FILED VILHIS ZU DA"S ;.FT`R TdE DITE OF flt :S -
pcf`THIS tC?So C^ 1.� ih` C Imo: C- T CITY CLERK.
c TIDII 11 ThE Vr In<CE Gc cP P R'.-lT
-ar $� I `_ Cc?T-
_ --r .. it T11 h UPY OF TciO C .L h r
P F - r, I •
�. ' i Peg_D A'tD IIJ r I r -rU IS
't CLER thAT IT hAS BEEN
DIS:, �E� CR L
�,, rhC-
Flt t4it. C. ty Ctl.-_
B' AND Ii;DE%�D u .0° CF TNr
1 1 c_ScY. F' u' lrti DEEL$
RI:C.:r.d.� . y.J
OF RECORD GR Ti'' N.,,irO cG k.D NG'ED G�� THE OK NER'S CERTIFICATE 0'r TITL .
BOARD OF APPEAL
e _
"a vLIt J of ttlPm, � c�fi5ttL�11�Pff8
�nttrb of '�ppettl
PV
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF HAMBLET & HAYES FOR in Lr
VARIANCE FOR LOT 118 .COLONIAL ROAD
CITY C''— .!lr
A hearing on this petition was held November 19, 1986 with the following Board
Members present: James Hacker, Chairman; Messrs. , Bencal, Fleming, Strout and
Associate Member Dore. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and
notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in
accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioners, owners of the property,. are requesting a Variance from minimum front
setback to allow construction of an empty drum storage shed in this Industrial Zone.
The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding of the
Board that:
a. special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect
the land, ,building or structure involved and which are not generally
affecting other lands, buildings or structures in the same district;
b. literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve
substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner; and
c. desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the
hearing; and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact:
1 . No opposition was voiced to the plan;
2. The problems expressed,as to odors, would not be increased because the
drums stored are to be empty, new and only for the use of solvents to
be directly shipped after filled.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the
hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1 . Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property
but not the district generally;
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would
involve substantial hardship to the petitioner;
3. The relief requested can be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
. DECISION ON THE PETITION OF HAMBLET & HAYES FOR A
VARIANCE FOR LOT 118 COLONIAL ROAD, SALEM
page_ two
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the
e
Variance from minimum front yard setback requirements to allow front yard depth of
ten (10) feet for the construction of an empty drum storage shed, subject to the
following terms and conditions:
1 . Empty drum storage shed is to be constructed in accordance with
the plans submitted to the Board;
2. All drums stored in the facility shall be new and contain no
inner matter;
3. Construction shall comply with Massachusetts State Building Code and
Salem Fire Prevention Code;
4. A Building Permit must be obtained.
VARIANCE GRANTED
Peter Strout, Member Board of Appeal
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK
i FILED 14GHI'i [G DAYS AFTEP. THE DATE OF FILL".0
APPEAL FROM THIS DEC!SIO`N, IF ?.tiY, S4ALL BE ASADE PURSUANT TO SECTION 17 OF THE K..:+::.
CENEP.AL L"';S. CH.=�iEd EG°, h 7 SHC.L, EE
TH' CIP' CLERK. c PEF':,{T
E PE"'.
. , GF THIS DEC 13 TH CFIC: O,.o Go: S-i'"', 11. THE ';/',RiA�;C� �R ?.E CERT'
.P, TE 6 Gr T . . E
Tl'
r. HEP I 41:_rL it r:i T Ar yp" D AND I J - : :� h IS _
�r CLER l h: 20 '7 nA\ -- DIS' : ED OR L .
rIL I�iP CF T4_ C'.1 c IH=1 I:
HAS Dc. o T ::[ GF 'HE
CF TP.f'.S, iF EJCH :.': APPC�L v,,.;S B�- • C- DEEDS A'( II•DEXiD �,•D.• iN_
rn'n" , THE GIYNER'$ CERT
IFICATE OF TITLE.
RECOFjc:: i': TtIE 5:'d:H ESE%. RE I -D
OF RECORD OR I$ RECORDED AND NG1ED 0�� BOARD OF APPEAL
"
- ----- - -- - - --- --- - - -- --._._ - J
TOP OF FILL BANK EXISTING
OUTFALL\ 10. /
MARSH / \
LEGEND a ABBREVIATIONS
\ 10.6., , 4_ CATCH BASIN
\ o BOUNDARY MARKER
10.7 LIMIT OF I00� BUFFER ZONE -x-x-x- FENCE
10.6 \ - -Io - - EXISTING CONTOUR
o APPROX. LIMITS OF 100' WETLANDS
low VALVE CHAMBER BUFFER ZONE
116 \V � $$ RAILROAD SPUR
° \ F.F. EL. FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION
CONC. CONCRETE
BLDG. BUILDING
RIM 11.1 RIM ELEVATION
GARAGE 11.7 11 .3 /
o
F.F. EL.15 .7
11 .3 PAVEMENT\
\ 9.9 10.9 ILI � � 1 _ ` _ 11.6
SOLVENT BUILDING
�\ F. F. EL. 15.6 11.5 % ° CONPAD I 0 RIM 11.1 F.F. EL. 11.7
10.
\\
\ 0- 1/
\ \ o 11.3
11.4 GCONC. PAD . 11.8
MANUFACTORY\9.3 I
11.9
\ \ 11 .5 �- _ 120�
\ \ 2 \ \ \
i
- 12F.F. EL . 11 .6 .0-
,.0
uo
° � - �
O
19 \ �,N /p &
o \
9.2 \_1 \ p:
8.7 12 .1 O
10.3 RIM 11.1 = 1J.9 ' PAVEMENT
10.512.1
O Q
\ � � COgp/NG AREA /� I I� FOUNDATION
12.3
r
r
/p PAVEMENT r 11.2 11.8
11.3
Q RIM 10.3
- �
o RIM 10.2 � Q RIM 10.3 � \ I k
OFFICES Q / 1 9.90 / \� ?RUCK SCALE �\ % Q RIM 10.2 \
1 � PAVEMENT
FF. EL. 11 .4 �_ .-F i I
MARSH I PROppSE� E�pT �- - 38_0 .t CONC. PAD �, h
o \ � LABORATORY FIIV, °LR9ELo-�: 2r_DYH�RUM STpR S x1
EXISTING H (MAXJ HEp II1.6 -_ <� °
I /
F.F. EL. 11.4 4-0 m GRADELo
7=O"f co
SOLVENT BLDG
k
APPROX. 10-O" SETBACK 1g8_87'\�
FROM BOUNDARY N 36,T-8- ",wI 14.0
GA E
6 63 W
N 580
° 40
TOP OF FILL BANK 10.3
-- -
/ RIM 10.2 Q / _ / --14-- -
/ �,,
NOTES: 1. BUILDING LOCATIONS, CONTOURS, SPOT ELEVATIONS, `
`p e o M s� DES. BY: P. T.W. DR. BY: T.R.A. CK. BY: M.R.A.
PAVEMENT LIMITS, AND OTHER PHYSICAL FEATURES oriPFTTA
T. ' HAMBLET & HAYES CO.
/ TAKEN FROM DWG. NO. 560-000, PROJECT NO. 84-16, ? WA�i/ SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS TITLED "SITEWORK PLAN- PROPOSED VALVE CHAMBER" W. Sl .,
DATED 8-84 PROVIDED BY HAMBLET & HAYES CO. . clsit tom'
2. BOUNDARIES TAKEN FROM DWG. ENTITLED "PLOT PLAN , TsroIVAL,
OF LAND IN SALEM, MASS.- PROPERTY OF HAMBLET & PROPOSED
HAYES CO. " ORIG. MAY 26,1961, OSBORN PALMER
/ INC. 15 WALLIS ST. PEABODY, MASS. . EMPTY DRUM STORAGE SHED
REDRAWN: BY/ E.H'.PORTER CO. , PEABODY, MASS.- -
DEC. 1965. SITE PLAN
REDRAWN: BY T.R.KINRAIDE, WALTHAM, MASS.-/ SCALE I" = 20'- 0" JOB 86039.02/ SEPT. 1970.
DRAWING PROVIDED 8Y HAMBLET & HAYES CO. . DATE SEPTEMBER 1986 SHEET IOFI
3. ABOVE TWO DRAWINGS COMBINED TO FORM THIS SHEET. WOODARD & CURRAN INC.
NO NEW FIELD SURVEY WORK WAS PERFORMED TO VERIFY
EXISTING CONDITIONS.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
e
GORHAM, MAINE
, , MIgHLAN R SFILLEF CO.WG.
B
NOTES: A. CONCRETE:
3/4"GALV. ROOFING/SIDING
~ 6 _ 1. CU'IP:RESS7VE STF2I34GTfT OF OUKRETE AT 28 DAYS 3000-PST. -
FLASHING W/ I
2. REINFORCEMENT: ASTM A-615 GRADE 60.
" „ NEOPRENE CLOSURE-
�- 18-0' 18'-0 181-0 18'-0 18 -0 3. CONCRETE DESIGN AS PER ACI-318-63 BUILDING CODE.
3'-0"x 3'-0"x I'-0" FOOTING
W/4- #5 EA. WAY HORIZ. a I'-Oz 1'- 0" 4. REINFORCING FABRICATION AND PIACF2142Tf AS PER ACI-315
PIER W/4 -#5 VERT. a #3 12" [71 DETAILING MANUAL.
A - - - - - - - - (TYP.)
4T L2 1/2"x 2 1/2"x 1/4" CONT. 5. CHAMFER 3/4" ALL EXPOSED CORNERS OF OONCRETE.
WELD TO W6
B. ANCHOR BOLTS:
I
i,
1. ANCHOR BOLTS: ASIM A-307.
o C. STRUCTURAL SIB'S,:
1
SECTION o- 1. ALL STEEL ASTM A-36.
a � i SCALE: I"= 1'-0° 2 2
2. FABRICATION AND ERECTION AS PER AISC SPECIFICATIONS.
3. CONNF TIONS: BOLTED: 3/fl" DIAMETER A-325-N.
i
A WELDED: E70XX ELECTRODES.
IL2" CONNECTION AS PER RISC "SIMPLE FRAMING" TYPE 2
CONSTRUCTION. MINIMUM 2 BOLTS PER CONNECTION.
12 _�� GIRT LINE 4. ALL STRUCTURAL STEEL SHALL BE PAINTED WITH TNEMSC 93
GALV. ROOFING
-, I TOP OF STEEL EL. 30.0 ZINC PRIMER AND 66 HI-BUILD EPDXOLINE OR EQUAL.
3/4
90'- 0" 5. ALL FLANGES OF BEAM TO BEAM COAR�JCI'ICNS ARE FLUSH AT
L 70P UNLESS OTHERWISE No=.
o __- - EAVE FLASHING W/NEOPRENE D. ROOF AND SIDING PANELS:
CONNECT TOP GIRT TO ROOF CLOSURES
BEAM AT 1/3 POINT a AT COL.
1. ALL PANELS SHALL BE 3/4" FX.CNOLAP 24 GAUGE G-90
GALVANIZED STEEL MADE BY Si ITE OR EQUAL.
FOUNDATION PLAN w6x20 COL.
It 2. FURNISH AND INSTALL ALL METAL WAIS, AND ROOF PANELS AS
SCALE ' I/8"= I'- 0" C 6 x 8.2 GIRT TYP. W/ 5/8"� _
SAG RODS AT I/3 POINTS J -3/4"GALV. SIDING/ROOFING PER MANUFAMURER'S RFX7Qr4 MTIONS. PROVIDE TRIM,
FLASHING CLOSURE PIECES, AND ALL, ACCESSORIES AS
CONNECT BRACING ATX LNG POINT ( o REQUIRED.
-7
TOP
TOP OF STEEL EL. 30.0 \ J 3 4 5 6 t }_
Y 2 2 1 E. DRAWINGS:
ALONG COL. LINEA 2 C 1. BEFORE FABRICATION AND CONSTRUCTION, SUBMIT SHOP
DRAWINGS FOR ALL MATERIALS FOR ENGINEERS REVIEW.
2 2 3/4"x 8"x 0'-8" BASE fL J � F. GRAVEL:
A (:i)-
- - - - i I- - - - -I-- - - A 3/4" GROUT -
2 2 - - \ \ / / / 2 2 - o TOP OF PIER EL. 13.0 1. GRAVEL: HARD, DURABLE STOLE WITH COARSE TO FINE SAND-
1 SIEVE ANALYSIS BY WEIG-1T:
'o " „ " „
L31/2 x21/2 x3/8 (�.L.V.) x6 LG. SIZE B PASSING
- 2-3/4'0 ANCHOR BOLTS W/2 1/2" CLIP ANGLE W/2-3/4 0 EXPAN. BOLTS
31' 10
PROJECTION MIN. 41/2" MIN. EMBED. 1/4" 25070
J I -3
E ` \ / / -
ONO. 40
4„ PAVEMENT SURFACE EL. 11.0* NO. 200 00-5
2 2 E \ � I \ / _(D
+� --
4-# 5 VERT.------------ L 3"x3"x 3/8" CONT.
D / / / / l #3 AT 12" O.C.
:✓ _ El2 I/[" 21/2„
GRAVEL 3/4' THICK f£.- 1 1/16"0 HOLES FOR
K.B. (TYP.) \ \ / \ K.B. v �3/4"0 BOLTS (TYP.)
B - I - - - - --= I 3� _ - - - --I - 4-#5 HORIZ. EA. WAY TBOTTOM
TOP OF STEEL EL. 31.83 L2 1/2"x21/2"x 1/4W6x15 (TYP.) �W6x20 COL. (TYP.) -W12x26 (TYP. ON COL. LINES OF FOOTING EL. 7.0
ALONG COL. LINE 8 BRACING CONNECTED TO BOT. FLANGE I-6 INCL.) B g - =a
OF W6x15 AS SHOWN M AND AT COL. (TYP.) 2 2 2 2 ro o0 r PLACING SOIL BEFORE
FOOTING (TYP.)
ROOF FRAMING PLAN SNOW LOAD = 45 PSF SECTION ci- 12" MIN. 95% COMPACTED 8n W6x2O COL.
SCALE: I/8"= I'-0" WIND LOAD = 15 PSF SCALE°I/2"= I'-0" 2 2 GRAVEL MATERIAL-SEE
NOTE F
K.B.- W6x15 KNEE BRACING ALONG
LINE A8 B-BAYS 1-2 a 5-6 ONLY O O COL . BASE PLATE DETAIL
SCALE I"= 1'-0"
/ L9 1/16"
- i C6 z 8.2 GIRT (TYP.) i
5/8 7"
SAG RODS @ 1 - 1 GIRT LINE GIRT LINE
I/3 PTS. (TYP.) TOP/STEEL EL. 31.83
GIRT LINE I - -- . -- - ---
I' TOP/STEEL EL. 30.0 TOP/STEEL EL. 30.0
o p�- I i I - I - I 3/4" DEEP-24 GA. CORRUGATED
0to f 1 I I I I I GALV. STEEL ROOFING (TYP. FOR
1 45 I 1 1 I I I �I I 1 „ „ „ m o 7" 1 / SIDING)
� I I I I I L 3 x 3 x I/4 BRACING-LEG I FLASHING
LO
I I I I I I I I I I I I I TURN IN- BACK OF L I� GIRT LINEI
0 i I I I I i - i 1 ) I i ALONG ( OF COL-CONNECT _
I I AT X-ING PT.. (TYP. ALONG II
~ I 1 I I I I I I I I I I LINE 1 8 6 )
1 I I I 1 I INEOPRENE W6z15
CQ I I I I I 1 I I I I I I CLOSURE
I I I
O
I I I 1 I I I I I I
I I ) j I I TOP/PIER EL. 13.0 L 5"x 3"x 1/4" CONT I DATE ADDITION OR REVISION
I I - I AT COL. LINES IS 6
�I 1 PAVEMENT SURFACE EL. 11.0 t _
_ W 12x26
,-J L, L, r-J l__, ( I , A
W6x20 COLUMN
r-� L. _jti ,J L, 1 'aa� PETF#i t. •�Q/`
WA
C--� --J 5/8"ID SAG RODS AT `o ahL
1/3 PTS. (TYP.)
ELEVATION A-A ELEVATION
SCALE' 1/8"= I'-0" 2 2
SCALE : I/8"= I'-0" 2 2 DES. BY: TCP DR. BY: PLB CK BY: PJ D
--- C6x 8.2 HAMBLET a HAYES CO.
SALEM MASS.
SECTION E-E PROPOSED
SCALE; I 1/2"= 1'-011 2 2 EMPTY DRUM STORAGE SHED
FOUNDATION AND FRAMING PLANS
a DETAILS
SCALE AS NOTED JOB 86039.02
DATE SEPTEMBER 1986 1 SHEET 2 OF 2
WOODARD & CURRAN INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
PORTLAND, MAINE
„q,.LHN l EVIL IEH GU MIO..
I