9 CLOVERDALE AVENUE - PORCELLO, WILLIAM - ZBA ( 9 CLOVERDALE AVENUE
P William Porcello
Variance-Granted-9/29/82
i
t -
co
Qllifc, o� Iem, a� �c �iT4 i
,of z1
82 aCT -5 A9 :38
Y rri �;�;r•�;
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF WILLIAM PORCELLO REQUESTING CAI TVgqR�AN'CE r:Fr!IC E
FOR 9 CLOVERDALE AVENUE
A hearing on this petition was held on September 29, 1982, with the following Board
Members present: Douglas Hopper, Chairman; Messrs Piemonte, Hacker, LaBrecque and
Feeherry. Notices of the hearing were sent to abutters and others and` a notice
of the hearing was published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with.Massachusetts
General Laws Chapter 40A.
The Petitioner has requested a variance for the property at 9 Cloverdale Avenue to
construct a 16' r. 10.9' addition to the property. A variance is required because
the proposed addition will be built up to the sideyard property line.
The Board of Appeals, after consideration of the evidence presented at the
public hearing and after viewing the property makes the following findings of fact:
1) Petitioner 's proposed addition into the minimum sideyard at the site will have virtually
no effect on the area because of the area.
2) Petitioner's proposed construction was unopposed by his abutters.
On the basis of the 'above findings of fact, and the-' evidence presented at the public
hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1) The property in question is unique because of its peculiar configuration and
because of the fact that there is no other possible location at the site for
the proposed addition.
2) The conditions described above especially affect the land in •question but do
not generally affect the zoning district in which the land is located.
3) The conditions described above which affect the land in question, but not the
zoning district generally cause the following special hardship: unless a variance
is granted, it will be virtually impossible to construct an addition at the site.
4) The desired variance may be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good.
Therefore, the Board of Appeal unanimously voted in favor of granting the requested
relief. The Board granted a variance to the Petitioner on the following terms:
1) A variance is granted to allow construction of a 16' x 10.9' addition to the
property in accordance with the plans submitted to the Board.
2) Petitioner shall obtain a Certificate of Use and Occupancy prior to using the proposed
addition.
-82 LCT -5 A9 :38
CITY CL `,rnFF►CE 1
SALT -1
• PETITION OF WILLIAM PORCELLO FOR
A VARIANCE FOR 9 CLOVERDALE AVENUE
PAGE 2
SEPTEMBER 29, 1982
r
3) Petitioner shall submit detailed plans to the Building Inspector in connection
with his request for a Building Permit.
4) Petitioner shall comply with all applicable fire and safety codes.
O s
Anthony M. Feehe ry, Secretary
j
APPEAL FRO.1 7!1!S DEC!SlOil. I ,"-.'.."i. SNA'L DE .'.1?:?' ^S' r^;;r.�i
GENERAL LAWS,S, C � i J TO S 17 OF TRE MASS-
L ' b DAYS AFTER, TBE LATE C: FiLIitG
0 iu ' UES,.,. r .
__. ' TdE f:; CP �r L.L PEq:iIT
OR H.-TSU,a
OF RECORD OR ISR,CUMED AND i r.i_D •0 ru'. C,uE-i$ ER CA�EJO- Tu�E, . UE THE C!';SiER
BOARD OF APPEAL
A COPY OF THIS DECISION AND PLANS HAVE BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND CITY CLE
ro �
UJ
o �cr,
a � o
W Q A
J %U
11 ¢ ¢K q
4
Z,7 ¢
R
� 0
v moo.
J
v
e �
o Y
F
Fi.Q
o�
nl
o;
D
0
v W r N•
v J K IJ
0 ,
bo•oo/zt
osr 6/'8 V
o Q o
4I Q' VJ
DO•moi
/i -es
%�s