20 CIRCLE HILL ROAD - DOUROUDIS, JOHN - ZBA 20 Circle Hill Rd. R-1
John Douroudis
4 �
l O'
I
i'. ofc�Itm, �' tIs52It�u5P##s
Poara of tAppeal
p1
�O(41FL 9'"
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF JOHN DOUROUDIS FOR A VARIANCE AT
20 CIRCLE HILL ROAD (R-1 )
A hearing on this petition was held on June 29, 1988 with the following
Board Members, James M. Fleming, Chairman; Messrs. Richard Bencal, John
Nutting, Edward Luzinski, and Associate Member Arthur LaBracque. Notice
of the hearing was sent to abutters and others, and notices of the hearing
were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with the
provisions of Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
The petitioner, the owner of the property is seeking a Variance from rear
setback to allow for the construction of a one (1 ) story addition at the
locus. The property is located in an R-1 zone.
The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding of
the Board that:
a. special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect
the land, building or structure involved and which do not generally
affect other lands, buildings and structures in the same district;
b. a literal enforcement o` the provisions of the Ordinance would
in volve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise to the
petitioner; and
c. desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to
the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating
from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
The Board of Appeal, after hearing the evidence presented at the hearing,
makes the following finding of fact:
1. No opposition to the petition was presented at the hearing.
2. Ward Four Councillor Leonard O'Leary sent a letter in support of
the plan.
3. The proposed addition is in harmony with the existing neighborhood.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented
at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1 . Special conditions exist which affect the prenesis which do not
generally affect the district.
2. Literal enforcement of the Zoning Ordinance would involve a
substantial hardship upon the petitioner.
3. The variances requested can be granted without substantial detriment
to the public good and without substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF JOHN DOUROUDIS FOR A VARIANCE AT
20 CIRCLE HILL ROAD (R-1) SALEM
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the
relief requested subject to the following conditions:
1. That the exterior finishes of the addition be in harmony wi the
exterior finishes of the existing building.
2. That all construction conform to the requirements of the
Massachusetts Building Code, and that the petitioner obtain the
necessary building permit.
3. That all construction be done as per the plans submitted to the
Board of Appeals.
4. That a Certificate of Occupancy be obtained prior to Occupancy
of the addition.
VARIANCE GRANTED
3ames M. Fleming, Esq,,/
,,/'Chairman, Board of Appeal
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK
r.:
P T
� p
r..
Y
66
The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding of the
Board that:
a. special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect
the land, building or structure involved and which do not generally
affect other lands, buildings and structures in the same district;
b. a literal enforcement of the provisions of the Ordinance would
involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise to the
to the petitioner; and
c. desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to
the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating_
from the intent of the district or the parpose of the Ordinance.
Phe Board of Appeal , after hearing the evidence presented at tt:- :r>arina,
Takes the fcllowing finding of fact:
� Ecrsti�� 6N �f1 C � T� 1,o1� pF' ��fNJ
A Q RK-IRNCC FST
. r
_ l �� f..l��' . � �v�Law••� 6 a c:.-r�. h1x.w_.�e.� Vous-e.��
. �w`..�.-S rte- �'ia.�..�;�, c�,m..��r,.-�..�. _ :�, r✓��fs,� . �.��.,�
h al,✓.e, `l--w a��s1C
1041
1) 1
P� ,�Vr C. �- �%�-1/17 C2 S
,, c.� c ira�a�c-� `ra\JQ1�
o-e u4-d� w. '44 .
f Ps c L `C
"j, �I U lir tv-. CLI
- _ - � '1 k+., c�a�.:s'M�cll•�.,, �i� o� d Iia., �.�J S'�'e� c—E;�a� ,1�a w
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at
the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1 . Special conditions exist which affect the premesis whicl-: do not
generally affect the district.
} 2. Literal enforcemen t of the Zoning Ordinance would involve a substantial
hardship upon the petitioner.
3. The variance requested can be granted without substantial detriment to
the public good and without substantially derogating from the intent
of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
Ll act,
- -- _ _ . �n.nHn�r^.�"^-Sl.� 1 S-n6 II� . '� �.v�.w�'. .I�.�,- r-c.��,� _ b�e.ya�.s�•ol-_ _ __
_. _. . _ _ /l•_ ._ ' '"" .1 I.a,f'. T�I�•�5 .. �7 .. 4LL,. ,11-d.�11.
77
ell
� ' �� L1. . 11L✓Y1�Cs�.� y� VGCIT�G�w�. __�`-'� _.— _ _-
0 �1� rjv'td;r.
-G��%wr
_ 1
CURVE TABLE
CURVE ARC LENGTH DELTA RADIUS TANGENT CHORD
Cl 38.91 74'-18 -12" 30.00 22.73 36.24
C2 96.93 15'-12'-56" 365.00 48.75 96.65
5TAMA TIOS HA TZES
BOOK 5882 PAGE 111
159
'(N Dr r�ya..
GERALD M. CARPII✓ELLA i' RALPH
BOOK 5724 PAGE 389 ' W EIDM N�t
F
T
/ N
STEPHEN ✓. WILSON Z 94
BOOK 5757 PAGE 510 A ^o ' Os1ss" 3015e
Ito
Ln n
DECK TO BE L
LY? ,' FIEM0VE0 „�~ ,�,' "I CERTIFY THAT AN ACTUAL
ON 49170UN0 SL117VEY WAS MAOE
f _-- ON MA Y 10, 1988, ANO THAT
180 0.30' ' THE OWEL L ING IS L OCA TED AS
SPLIT ENTf7Y 0", SHOWN HEREON. R � s1
VINL Y SIDED0
X20 PROPSE
ADDIT IODN:ti LOT 173 Q,
_!_6_--J, 8920 S. F.
-----T------- �0 50
O
o i
�I O
.y I cc a
Cli �O
C2
C,
1 INCH s 20 FEET
CIf7CLE HILL ROAD 20 0 20 40 so
PLAN OF LAND
IN
SALEM, MASS.
OWNED BY.- JOHIV 9
RAL L OU DOUROUDIS
REID L AND SURVEYORS
365 CHA THAM ST. , L YIN, MASS.
°see 068 " SCALE 1 "=20 ' MA Y 10, 1988
BB-4