7 CHURCHILL STREET - MATTEI, FREDERICK - ZBA 7 CHURCHILL STREET
FREDERICK MATTEI
i`
y t (arab of Appeal
'81 APR -2 A8 :73
MARCH is 1981
CITY CLE h'S OFFICE
SA LE! ,
DECISION ON TNB PETITION Or FREDERICK M1TTEI REQUESTING A VARIANCE FOR 7 CHURCHILL
STREET
A hearing on this Petition was held on March 1.8, 1981, with the following
Board Members present: Douglas Hopper, Chairman; Messrs. Piemonte, Hacker
and Associate Member Luzinski. Notices of the hearing was published in the
Salem Evening News on March 4, 1981 and March 11, 1981 in accordance with
Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 40A.
The Petitioners have requested a variance for the property at 7 Churchill
Street to construct an addition approximately 24 feet by 25 feet which would
1. extend an existing encroachment: into the side yard and 2. reduce the rear
yard to 20 feet. A variance is required be the proposed construction
violates minimum side and rear yard restrictions.
The Board of Appeals, after consideration of the evidence presented at
the public hearing and after viewing the property makes the following findings
of fact:
1. The existing structure on the property is unigl.ie in that its peculiar
location on the land in question makes it virtually impossible to modify the
structure without a variance.
2. The requested variance is supported by the neighbors.
3. The proposed construction will enhance the appearance of.the neighborhood.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and the evidence presented
at the public hearing, the Board of Appeals concludes as follows:
(1) The petitioner's property is unique because of the size and shape
of the lot and the location of the existing structure on the lot.
(2) The conditions described above especially affect the land and structure
in question but do not generally affect the zoning district in which the property
is located.
(3) The conditions described above which affect the land in question, but
not the zoning district generally cause the following special hardship: unless.
the requested variance is, granted petitioner will not be able to improve the
appearance of his property.
(4) The desired variance may be granted without substantial detriment to
the public good because the proposed construction will enhance the surrounding
neighborhood.
l it of �'Ukx�,
Pi V ;;
ourcb of �AIpeat
°81 APP, —2 A8 :53
DECISION - *LARCH 18, 1981 - 11ATTEI - PAGE U40
CITY `LER "O, OFFICE
SALE. c•S.
Therefore, the Board of Zoning Appeals unanimously voted in favor of
granting the requested relief. The Board grants a variance to the petitioner
on the following terms and conditions:
1. A variance is granted from minimum side and rear yard requirements
to allow construction of the proposed addition up to 5 feet from the side
property line and up to 20 feet from the rear property line.
2. All construction will be in accordance with plans submitted to the
Board.
Douglas Hopper, Chairman
FRi�:3i Tk??S GtL:SV;4!• f. k 1' S-�a!! 3� s.1vE Pt:RSS:A;[T ID SILT:Ci9 t7 Ctr TT:"th1!$$. .
c FR1Nt�
S> ';;tTN'?i 20 vAYS t1r�`_t THE 9>T Gi
Viz- ai U,•iS. -:,3 f , ci u` ^ER`114
a _ -.� ..
c r� V R L r'=D !i
I?a„_ cr TH D`art€R
IF (a ` , -
,j,940 ifY i4 H of
F �,..�
OF PLC= OR 1S F COADEO ARD JD EO u,1 I” u:J.1ER S L`cC(1F TE BOARQlOF APPFA6
A COPY OF THIS DECISION AND PLANS HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK
i
A'
WONOM .4
1jo
tkp
1 • `
r ,
y a
i C
FIN
I � 6
1
4f>
I .. i
- r� 1
N
N
G
t
.r
r
1
t ;
r
r ;
t ' F' ° � � - i- 1.. .. I ���I( ✓ I r � i __ � � � � �, �� .tel Y I NV` r,L..G_/'r./� ,: .
lioi 1
46,07
_ J L----
Ilk
l _
�--- -- - - =- t --- - '-L-_ I
f
Al
C
1111 '•. }VTC
_.-__------ ._ - 1 L
® �Y IINI�f II RI I 1
1 !!
II
.i
I�
1+
p
it 1
I' r•
I
Mfr
n
t
-
177
r
t - _
17
} r - •� _
—
til
- - 11.7
f
looff
R
J
i
j
yy i'
1 1
I
I Ij� 1 k i
a
I -
it
_ { "
i
i
,
JAI
it
i
s / \
i
Al
• it
1f ♦rte:. .q.-7 _ + �' • s..,.. .� Y- - � � Y.�
ff
i
�/�7�/y) j�) -�'""'1 ,y.""..� J/I�f],,."�(""j (/�'/�'\ j 1-- •-r—._li rye�' " � }.; � ,..... ,.. }_, 1•—_ 1 1 � — —` _ ��+.
TAE+ � 1 � � `•.e
f: