Loading...
9 CHERRY HILL AVENUE - KAPOGLIS, GREGORY - ZBA 9 Cherry Hill Ave. :R-1 Gregory Kapoglis x �j li 4� (Cita of ttlem, � ttssttcltusetts a ` aurd 0{ �1J�IP2Il CIC( F`KSS pfhl�ESS DECISION ON THE PETITION OF GREGORY KAPOGLIS FOR VARIANCES AT 9 CHERRY HILL AVENUE (R-1) A hearing on this petition was held July 20, 1994 with the following Board Members present: Stephen Touchette, Chairman; Gary Barrett, Nina Cohen and Associate Member Arthur LaBrecque. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws . Chapter 40A. Petitioner, owner of the property, is requesting Variance from lot size and frontage to allow construction of a single family dwelling. Property is located in the R-1 district, Residential Single Family. The Variances which have been requested may be granted upon a finding by this Board that: 1. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings and structures involved. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner. 3. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1. There was no opposition to the petition. 2. The petitioner submitted architectural plans showing a single family dwelling that he proposed to build on the site. The proposed dwelling meets all zoning requirements as to front, rear and side setbacks. 3. The proposed dwelling does not meet zoning requirements as to lot size and frontage. 4. An abutter, Mr. Rouleau of 7 Cherry Hill Ave. expressed concern that the neighbors be forewarned of any blasting that may take place on the site, and that such blasting be done in a manner to put the adjacent properties at least risk. DECISION ON THE PETITION OF GREGORY KAPOGLIS FOR VARIANCES AT 9 CHERRY HILL AVENUE, SALEM page two �(� y 5. An abutter, Mr. Garette of 5 Cherry Hill Ave. , state e`�wouicPha objection provided the architectural plans, which shlriRyaOpfro t facing entrance, be followed. CLERKfs ICESS OFF 6. The Ward Councillor, Leonard O'Leary, stated he had no objections provided the abutter's concerns were addressed by the property owner. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1. Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property but not the district in general. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship to the petitioner. 3. Desirable relief can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 4-0 to grant the variances requested, subject to the following conditions: 1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, ordinances, codes and regulations. 2. All construction shall be done in strict accordance with the plans and dimensions submitted. 3. Petitioner shall comply with all requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety. 4. A pre-blast survey is to be done if there is any blasting required. 5. A Building Permit is to be obtained prior to beginning construction. 6. A Certificate of Occupancy is to be obtained. Variances Granted July 20, 1994 Nina V. Cohen, Member Board of Appeal J , DECISION ON THE PETITION OF GREGORY KAPOGLIS FOR VARIANCES AT 9 CHERRY HILL AVENUE, SALEM page three q AUG Z 9 24 AH / A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNIVIT� CITY AND THE TY CLERKOLER SALEM. MASS S OFFICE Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11, the Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owners Certificate of Title. Board of Appeal t Chi of Salem, Auss Irbusetts x 3 4 ' �Rottra of Au{renl CITY CLEp SOF I� SS DECISION ON THE PETITION OF GREGORY KAPOGLIS FOR VARIANCES AT 9 CHERRY HILL AVENUE (R-1) A hearing on this petition was held July 20, 1994 with the following Board Members present: Stephen Touchette, Chairman; Gary Barrett, Nina Cohen and Associate Member Arthur LaBrecque. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioner, owner of the property, is requesting Variance from lot size and frontage to allow construction of a single family dwelling. Property is located in the R-1 district, Residential Single Family. The Variances which have been requested may be granted upon a finding by this Board that: 1. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings and structures involved. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner. 3. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1. There was no opposition to the petition. 2. The petitioner submitted architectural plans showing a single family dwelling that he proposed to build on the site. The proposed dwelling -- meets all zoning requirements as to front, rear and side setbacks. 3. The proposed dwelling does not meet zoning requirements as to lot size and frontage. 4. An abutter, Mr. Rouleau of 7 Cherry Hill Ave. expressed concern that the neighbors be forewarned of any blasting that may take place on the site, and that such blasting be done in a manner to put the adjacent properties at least risk. DECISION ON THE PETITION OF GREGORY KAPOGLIS FOR VARIANCES AT 9 CHERRY HILL AVENUE, SALEM page two Q 5. An abutter, Mr. Garette of 5 Cherry Hill Ave. , state�%e4ou�dPQ&' objection provided the architectural plans, which st07Wya0lf t facing entrance, be followed. CLER'S 0 F�HESS 6. The Ward Councillor, Leonard O'Leary, stated he had no objections provided the abutter's concerns were addressed by the property owner. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1. Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property but not the district in general. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship to the petitioner. 3. Desirable relief can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 4-0 to grant the variances requested, subject to the following conditions: 1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, ordinances, codes and regulations. 2. All construction shall be done in strict accordance with the plans and dimensions submitted. 3. Petitioner shall comply with all requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety. 4. A pre-blast survey is to be done if there is any blasting required. 5. A Building Permit is to be obtained prior to beginning construction. 6. A Certificate of Occupancy is to be obtained. Variances Granted July 20, 1994 Nina V. Cohen, Member Board of Appeal DECISION ON THE PETITION OF GREGORY KAPOGLIS FOR VARIANCES AT 9 CHERRY HILL AVENUE, SALEM page three AUG Z 9 24 AM 'Qq A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNI%TDffD AND THE CITY CLERK CLERK SALEM. MASS S OFFICE Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11, the Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. Board of Appeal (hitt, of Salem, `4Etts5ttcllusetts 3 �upeal GLErK S 0 iMESS DECISION ON THE PETITION OF GREGORY KAPOGLIS FOR VARIANCES AT 9 CHERRY HILL AVENUE (R-1) A hearing on this petition was held July 20, 1994 with the following Board Members present: Stephen Touchette, Chairman; Gary Barrett, Nina Cohen and Associate Member Arthur LaBrecque. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioner, owner of the property, is requesting Variance from lot size and frontage to allow construction of a single family dwelling. Property is located in the R-1 district, Residential Single Family. The Variances which have been requested may be granted upon a finding by this Board that: 1. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings and structures involved. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner. 3. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1. There was no opposition to the petition. 2. The petitioner submitted architectural plans showing a single family dwelling that he proposed to build on the site. The proposed dwelling — - meets all zoning requirements as to front, rear and side setbacks. 3. The proposed dwelling does not meet zoning requirements as to lot size and frontage. 4. An abutter, Mr. Rouleau of 7 Cherry Hill Ave. expressed concern that the neighbors be forewarned of any blasting that may take place on the site, and that such blasting be done in a manner to put the adjacent properties at least risk. j ' DECISION ON THE PETITION OF GREGORY KAPOGLIS FOR VARIANCES AT 9 CHERRY HILL AVENUE, SALEM page two Q 5. An abutter, Mr. Garette of 5 Cherry Hill Ave. , state e4ou9c$4i.*' objection provided the architectural plans, which s1WWya0 t facing entrance, be followed. CLER's} FIMFSS 6. The Ward Councillor, Leonard O'Leary, stated he had no objections provided the abutter's concerns were addressed by the property owner. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1. Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property but not the district in general. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship to the petitioner. 3. Desirable relief can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 4-0 to grant the variances requested, subject to the following conditions: 1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, ordinances, codes and regulations. 2. All construction shall be done in strict accordance with the plans and dimensions submitted. 3. Petitioner shall comply with all requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety. 4. A pre-blast survey is to be done if there is any blasting required. 5. A Building Permit is to be obtained prior to beginning construction. 6. A Certificate of Occupancy is to be obtained. Variances Granted July 20, 1994 0 � y Nina V. Cohen, Member Board of Appeal DECISION ON THE PETITION OF GREGORY KAPOGLIS FOR VARIANCES AT 9 CHERRY HILL AVENUE, SALEM page three AUG 1 9 24 AM 'qq A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNINVI7O6PD AND THE CITY CLERK CLERK�LEM. MASS OFFICE Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 4OA, Section 11, the Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owners Certificate of Title. Board of Appeal r (Gita of -Ij�aivm, fflassurijusetts ja4 �ottra of �upeal OF crCLERK!s, ,MESS DECISION ON THE PETITION OF GREGORY KAPOGLIS FOR VARIANCES AT 9 CHERRY HILL AVENUE (R-1) A hearing on this petition was held July 20, 1994 with the following Board Members present: Stephen Touchette, Chairman; Gary Barrett, Nina Cohen and Associate Member Arthur LaBrecque. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioner, owner of the property, is requesting Variance from lot size and frontage to allow construction of a single family dwelling. Property is located in the R-1 district, Residential Single Family. The Variances which have been requested may be granted upon a finding by this Board that: 1. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings and structures involved. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner. 3. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1. There was no opposition to the petition. 2. The petitioner submitted architectural plans showing a single family dwelling that he proposed to build on the site. The proposed dwelling -- meets all zoning requirements as to front, rear and side setbacks. 3. The proposed dwelling does not meet zoning requirements as to lot size and frontage. 4. An abutter, Mr. Rouleau of 7 Cherry Hill Ave. expressed concern that the neighbors be forewarned of any blasting that may take place on the site, and that such blasting be done in a manner to put the adjacent properties at least risk. DECISION ON THE PETITION OF GREGORY KAPOGLIS FOR VARIANCES AT 9 CHERRY HILL AVENUE, SALEM page two 5. An abutter, Mr. Garette of 5 Cherry Hill Ave. , state e2wotlftjK objection provided the architectural plans, which shogV yaorf t facing entrance, be followed. CLERK' pF, MASS 6. The Ward Councillor, Leonard O'Leary, stated he had no objections provided the abutter's concerns were addressed by the property owner. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1. Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property but not the district in general. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship to the petitioner. 3. Desirable relief can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 4-0 to grant the variances requested, subject to the following conditions: 1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, ordinances, codes and regulations. 2. All construction shall be done in strict accordance with the plans and dimensions submitted. 3. Petitioner shall comply with all requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety. 4. A pre-blast survey is to be done if there is any blasting required. 5. A Building Permit is to be obtained prior to beginning construction. 6. A Certificate of Occupancy is to be obtained. Variances Granted July 20, 1994 Nina V. Cohen, Member Board of Appeal J DECISION ON THE PETITION OF GREGORY KAPOGLIS FOR VARIANCES AT 9 CHERRY HILL AVENUE, SALEM page three Auc 1 9 24 4 i 0qq A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNINfI7O%#D AND THE CITY CLERK CLERK�LEH MASS S OFFICE Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11, the Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. Board of Appeal Chi of -ittlem, ��ttssttclTusetts ia4 Bourn of �upeal AUGUST 4, 1994 YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT AS OF AUGUST 2, 1994 THE DECISION OF THE BOARD OF APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK TO GRANT THE PETITION OF GREGORY KAPOGLIS FOR A VARIANCES TO ALLOW A CONSTRUCITON OF A SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AT 9 CHERRY HILL AVENUE. BOARD OF APPEAL BRENDA M. SUMRALL CLERK OF THE BOARD A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK. Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17, of MGL Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to MGL Chapter 40A. , Section 11, the Variance/Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of title. Board of Appeal DATE Or HEARING PETITIONER LOCATION MOTION: TO GRANT SECOND AMENDMENT SECOND TO DENY SECOND TO RE-HEAR SECOND WITHDRAW SECOND CONTINUE SECOND ROLL CALL PRESENT GRANT DENY AMEND WITHDRAW RE-HEAR CONTINUE GARY M. BARRETT CTFDRF�t nrrnenV © STEPHEN TOUCHETTE NINA V. COHEN ASSOCIATE MEMBERS ARTHUR LEBRECQUE CONDITIONS: \zbaform\ APPEAL CASE NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A•CO'.➢R Llf ttlem, ttss cl�usPf#s j — D��`� 5 �Rottrb of �}r ettl TO THE BOARD Of APPEALS: he Undersigned represent that he is are the owners of a certain parcel of land located at NO. . . . Y N4 ?: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Street; Zoning District. A. and said parcel is affected by Section(s. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . of the Massachusetts State Building Code. Plans describing the work proposed, have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in accordance with Section IX A. 1 of the Zoning Ordinance. kr O - -IM Cn O m W a c:j rn n (A gip' N L The Application for Permit was denied by the Inspector of Buildings for the following reasons: The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero- gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for the following reasons: r ` 1d 1ri 4AGe_i -`-row� +a a I tout Ce V% a +�C'+)iran a 1 eM-1%c�., �tve, i Owner. gr:q . Q \�.�. . . . . . . . . . Address A\ ? . WPPO .0. v1`ltoo TeIephone.C��g CSo8� �3i— K�at1 �Ho^n�-} Petitioner. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Address. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0ate. .�v l?. .'i4� i�`1�1 Telephone. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . By. ':. . . . . . . . . . . . . Three copies of the application must be filed with the Secretary, of the Board of Appeals with a check, for advertising in the amount of. l� .��: . . . ,our weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals. Check payable to The Evening News. I In jI. RtU af =0 Puarb rrf cAr' pvd OE Z8 1 lr PH 273 CITY t;% .;t"- + rFICE DECEMBER 19, 1979 SALEM, MASS. DECISION ON THE PETITION .OF PETER AND CAROL rATSARARES REQUESTING 'k VARIANCE" FOR LOTS '#`517, #519, and #521 CHERRY HILL AVENUE A hearing on this Petition was held on December 19, 1979 with th'e following Board Members present: James H. Boulger, Jr., Chaiimaa, Messrs. --_ Nutting, LaBrecque, Feeherry and Associate Member Luzinski. Notices of.the - hearing were sent to abutters and a notice of the Hearing was published in the Salem Evening News on December 5, 1979 and December 12, 1979, in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 40A. The Petitioners have requested a variance for the property designated as Lots f517, '519, and `521 Cherry Hill Avenue to combine these three lots _ into two lots each containing approximately 12,000 square feet of area and having 75 feet of frontage. A variance is required because the lots are in an R-1 district where building lots must have 15,000 square feet of area and 100 feet of frontage. The Board of Appeals, after consideration of the evidence presented at the public hearing makes the following findings of fact: 1. Previously each of the lots in question was under the then applicable zoning laws, suitable for construction of a single family dwellings in this R-1 district. Recent amendments to the zoning laws: caused these three lots to become a single lot. 2. The homes in the area surrounding these lots are, in general, constructed upon lots smaller than 10,000 square feet with less than 100 feet of frontage. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Board of Appeals concludes as follows: 1. The three lots in question, each of which was previously suitable for construction of a single family dwelling, have become a single lot by operation of law. 2. The conditions described above especially affect the land in question but do not generally affect o ct - _ _Wino l=,cr_ct in :ihich the building 3. =he conditions described above affect the land in question, but not the zoning district generally, cause the following special hardship; Without a variance, the land in question cannot be developed in a manner consistent %with the surrounding neighborhood, � NLir IIL �T�oTiT� (� i! P,EC(:IVI:D .?3IIarh of �Fprzl 7 DEC Lh l 1 CITY -o *FFICE . SALEH. NASS. PAGE TWO - DECISION - PETER & CAROL KATSARAKES, HOTS 0517, 0519,- and -9521 CHERRY HILL AVENUE 4. The desired variance may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good. j . Therefore, the Board of Zoning Appeals by a 5-0 vote, approves the granting . of the requested relief, and grants a variance to the petitioners on the following terms and conditions: The three lots in question can, conditioned upon approval by the Planning Board be combined in accordance with the plans submitted to this Board into 2 lots each with 75 feet of frontage and approximately 12,000 square feet of area, GRANTED Anthony bj: Feeherry /f 'Acting Secretary GIN U CF Ze' -_M f S is V Vv f C:2 it 'Cr Ai I 1 r 1 t PE-111-=0 1:1 ;!r. 50 ..i E^ - cc ._I,.SiO CR D7rVz3 i5 %:wnJ CZ 15 R:cmzE ,li:i. ..c-iCd C 7 7Ec ,.:i'!"'.(,- . c.r. TITiE, COF uF TyS DECIST_O�! FL4S BEEN F-LED 141-1 -2L,_v`ili:G BOARD AND TEE CITY CLERK �C�N �\ BOARD OF ASSESSORS 93 WASHINGTON STREET. CITY HALL. SALEM. MASSACHUSETTS 01970-3595 (508) 745-3595 Ext. 261 ' (508) 744-9327 FAX June 2, 1994 Leo E. Tremblav Inspector of Buildings 1 Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 Dear Sir: Please be advised that the parcel known as 9 Cherry Hill Avenue (Parcel #14-0224) was created as a separate parcel, along with 11 Cherry Hill Avenue (Parcel 9114-0259) , by means of a vari nce and a Form A plan in 1979, and was there— , not in.e stence as a parcel in 1965. Very tr �y rs, Pe r M. Caron Chairman PMC:mjg STREET CIL At 49 �•B���i6L0/ ' _. ! GAJ/--,- --- — --- s � r 74o3s 1 r. ,P.vIJ��� SOT LOT v 11 , 400 S.F. 12 ,300 S.F. v P n V i ! 79.Bs �l4to ' /Y3/- 3B Sy 704 Lf tr.Ko• - .✓1�- Sf- ?I E CHERRY HI L L AVE. PLAT I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS SALE A QPREPA PREPAREDININ ACCORDANCE WITH THE o. �� 4,, 04 i °•" \ �� t\\ Okti V \ \ \ \10)0 \\ 3a �, 300 /29/t1 \�O 12 099 13 000101 °° /Ay . \\\\\ \o °° X0000 g a ti 1 i 0 0 y, \ 103 J , 0 060 Al . < J (,5, tiaao 501,9 \\ . O6 ZA6o0 -A ��1 1 �\ a 2,150 X101 v B5 e O a y •,, • y Q� 6500 0 ° _ Vss •• 6 50 `L 5R u a 6 00 2i 915 1 •� 0 5 1 4 6, )u 1 4• �io ro41 r A� 0 1505 2 , T 650 209A0 1 ,1 b° J�aJE ot 11,660 / 213 61. 36 AC SALEM HIGH SCHOOL APPEAL CASE NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ctg of "ittl>em, 'Massar4usetts Porno of �ppral s� TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS: The Undersigned represent that he is are the owners of a certain parcel of land located at NO. . . . 9 . . .K% M . . hv�L: w ?: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Street; Zoning District. ..7A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ; and said parcel is affected by Section(s) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . of the Massachusetts State Building Code. Plans describing the work proposed, have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in accordance with Section IX A. 1 of the Zoning Ordinance. LQ ;tve_C7 m G7 W Dov Cn7 O ALL am w Ln N .G The Application for Permit was denied by the Inspector of Buildings for the following reasons: D k re C+ The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero- gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for the following reasons: Var; ar c� �cor� �a� Sizes anj -�o q \poi+-) Com SCJ c-Fiore o� q Sir\q�Z, -�R `Ml ��4 aWc �li�q. Dael� nq w 1\ r.ee+ ql\`1 Se_-'Ck Jre��ireraen�S, Owner.G.c,_�o ...���. . . . . . . . . . AddressWPR�0. MH. . Olgbo Telephone.(5�R$ (S08) 531-1Kh41 (\AOM19 Petitioner. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Address. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Date.3-Ut1e. .14� u. \9`94 . . . Telephone. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . By. .,u.`. ...Q : .� �� 9r . . . . . . . . . . . . Three copies of the application must be filed with theSgcretar of the Board of Appeals with a check, for advertising in the amount of. $. .��: 5. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . four weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals. Check payable to The Evening News. NO.................................... PETITION TO BOARD OF APPEALS LOCATION ................................................................ PETITIONER.......................................... ADDRESS............................................... ................................................ CONDITIONS ................................................................. ........................ ....................................... ................................................................ ................................................................. ...................................................I............. ................................................................. ,PETITION APPROVED.................... ❑ DENIED......................... 0 .............................................1 19......... Tl (t' '- �� r • •- � lr�" 11041 �Vll 41V 2833 o v \ \\ \100 �\ \ ) rn O \ � .So 2 300 \\ \\ ��O 121 O99 101 4jA� /2061 1 \O 00 e A53 m \ \ �Op° 10 2� 0 00 �O 1 \y, \ 03 ,060 0 , p °J o e O X5\2\\ \\`��� ary Q` Oa 6h< } \3. 'f,eooto ti s 5 o° 29 Ao �\�2'0 ry° It- %7. t- ; 6q ° 500 \� �s s° AO ) �1 ,ry^ . h° a 2• 36 500 a s Ve° rye rye �a \ .ZA 00 7,5 6,5 A 0 15 8`462 q2 �2q�jp oil Zo940 � O 1 o J�NJ PE 11�RQ - 16,61 //,660 j 213 61. 66 AC S A LE M HIGH SCHOOL r . Rr-Cf_IVI_D acs J ? uarb rrf CA,vp ud DEQ 1- ^ u„ �� PH119 CITY c- ;r; s OFFICE DECE14BER 19: 1979 SALE N, HASS. DECISION ON THE PETITION OF PETER AND CAROL KATSARAA'ES REQUESTING A VARIANCE FOR LOTS 4517, #519, and T521 CHERRY HILL AVENUE A hearing on this Petition was held on December 19, 1979 with the following Board Members present: James H. Boulger, Jr., Chaizmaa, Messrs: ` --- Nutting, LaBrecque, Feeherry and Associate Member Luzinski. Notices of the hearing were sent to abutters and a notice of the fiearing was published in the Salem Evening News on December 5, 1979 and December 12, 1979, in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 40A. The Petitioners have requested a variance for the property designated as Lots 4F517, 4x519, and 74,=521 Cherry Hill Avenue to combine these .three lots into two lots each containing approximately 12,000 square feet of area and having 75 feet of frontage. A variance is required because the lots are in an R-1 district where building lots must have 15,000 square feet of area and 100 feet of frontage. The Board of Appeals, after consideration of the evidence presented at '. the public hearing makes the following findings of fact: 1. Previously each of the lots in question was under the then applicable zoning laws, suitable for construction of a single family dwellings in this R-1 district. Recent amendments to the zoning laws caused these three lots to become a single lot. 2. The homes in the area surrounding these lots are, in general, constructed upon lots smaller than 10,000 square feet with less than 100 feet of frontage. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Board of Appeals concludes as follows: 1. The three lots in question, each of which was previously suitable for construction of a single family dwelling, have become a single lot by operation of law. 2. The conditions described above especially affect the land in question but do not generally affect t..e zonir.g district in tinich the building =eca_ed. 3. The conditions described above affect the land in question, but not the zoning district generally, cause the follo:ring special hardship; Without a variance, the land in question cannot be developed in a manner consistent with the surrounding neighborhood. .NCiY'UI RECEIVED af DEC Lb C 17 r Fi '79 CITYC� n:i 'FmE SALEH. HASS. PAGE TWO - DECISION - PETER & CAROL KATSARAKES, LOTS -7517, -7519,- and §521 CHERRY HILL AVENUE 4. The desired variance may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good. Therefore, the Board of Zoning Appeals by a 5-0' vote, approves the granting of the requested relief, and grants a variance to the petitioners on the following terms and conditions: The three lots in question can, conditioned upon approval by the Planning Board be combined in accordance with the plans submitted to this Board into 2 lots each with 75 feet of frontage and approximately 12,000 square feet of area. GRANTED Anthony ry. Feeherry /J 'Acting Secretary ..C1 t i, s. °-E.';G71 17 .:?-:E iL?SS. .a:.cl 1."_.-!-.1r -- . r..Y. ..... 6 T:::.. a...•., G.. I. .S ^.pY � rl•:ri@. G53t't Ti:' a?T, aV;7; 07 r CIN 29 C:r MAT.Crr AJ'CY r F.t` REEc°.' C' I S-0 OR 6 rizQ is P�CJ C Q �:J ,r!� Su✓.i ��JL nf _ir: �. f:71 •t,_Er;EQ d'D'' , r - 0 i-• ii CR 1$ ° - .. _. - L:L',7= i�� .:LG Q F4Cp8Jc,, dl':! .CiEv G:J Tf3: 17;N4h o CERYMCW'7 uE T TLE. S A CO=Y OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FLED WIcH TP' PL4 :ING BOARD AND TIE CITY CLERK CITY OF SALEM CITY OF SALEM u BOARD.OF APPEAL I BOARD OF APPEAL 745-9595 Ext. 381 745-9595 Ext. 381 Will hold a public hearing for all persons inter- N I- Will hold a public hearing for all persons inter- l ested in the petition submitted by GREGORY inter- ested in the petition submitted by GREGORY KAPOGLIS for Variances from lot size and front- i KAPOGLIS for Variances from lot size and front- age to allow construction of a single family dwelling age to allow construction of single family dwelling at 9 CHERRY HILL AVE. (R-1). Said hearing to - at 9 CHERRY HILL AVE. (R-1). Said hearing to be held WEDNESDAY, JULY 20, 1994 AT 6:00 be held WEDNESDAY, JULY 20, 1994 AT 6:00 P.M., ONE SALEM GREEN, second floor. P.M., ONE SALEM GREEN, second floor. STEPHEN TOUCHETTE-Chairman STEPHEN TOUCHETTE, Chairman July 6, 13, 1994 SN26815 July 6, 13, 1994 SN26815 CITY OF SALEM CITY OF SALEM BOARD OF APPEALi, l BOARD.OF APPEAL 745-9595 Ext: 381 i 745-9595 Ext. 381 Will hold a public hearing for all persons inter- _i Will hold a public hearing for all persons inter- ested in the petition submitted by GREGORY ested in the petition submitted by GREGORY KAPOGLIS for Variances from lot size and front- KAPOGLIS for Variances from lot size and front- age to allow construction of single family dwelling I age to allow construction of single family dwelling at 9 CHERRY HILL AVE.(R-1). Said hearing to at 9 CHERRY HILL AVE. (R-1). Said hearing to be held WEDNESDAY, JULY 20, 1994 AT 6:00 be held WEDNESDAY, JULY 20, 1994 AT 6:00 P.M., ONE SALEM GREEN, second floor. { I P.M., ONE SALEM GREEN, second floor. i STEPHEN TOUCHETTE, Chairman ti STEPHEN TOUCHETTE, Chairman July 6, 13, 1994 SN26815 h� July 6, 13, 1994 SN26815 i i 1 CITY OF SALEM - BOARD OF APPEAL 745-9595 Ext. 381 j - Will hold a public hearing for all persons inter- ' Y ested in the petition submitted by GREGORY � KAPOGLIS for Variances from lot size and front- ' age to allow construction of a single family dwelling at 9 CHERRY HILL AVE. (R-1). Said hearing to be held WEDNESDAY, JULY 20, 1994 AT 6:00 P.M., ONE SALEM GREEN, second floor. r STEPHEN TOUCHETTE, Chairman July 6, 13, 1994 SN26815 APPEAL CASE NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ctv of "'littlPm, 'fflttssadjuse##s 19ottrb of �Vpral TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS: The Undersigned represent that he is are the owners of a certain parcel of land located at NO. . . 9 . .\Aikk . Fen�).e,, „ , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,Street; Zoning District.R-j . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : and said parcel is affected by Section(s) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . of the Massachusetts State Building Code. Plans describing the work proposed, have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in accordance with Section IX A. 1 of the Zoning Ordinance. �— [L Ea; "s ® E r O -^� w o m �? ~ m(n ao The Application for Permit was denied by the Inspector of Buildings for the following reasons: ^ UN^ ”" " 411V� The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero- gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for the following reasons: Owner.Gr. . . . . . . . . . . Address 43 . NR?Y n MA � Ol�bv Telephone. (,Tor) 531- $`ti41 �jHor.e , Petitioner. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Address. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Date. 'TV.ne. . .14" .1.`. ' Telephone. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . By. - . . . Q%.. . . . . . . . . . . . . Three copies of the application must be filed with the Se retary of the Board of Appeals with a check, for advertising in the amount of. . .la .1U. 1 , , , , , , , , , , , , four weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals. Check payable to The Evening News. a NO—.................................. 9 PETITION TO BOARD OF APPEALS LOCATION ................................................................ PETITIONER.......................................... ADDRESS............................................... ................................................ CONDITIONS ................................................................. ........................ ....................................... ................................................................ ................................................................. ................................................................. ................................................................. PETITION APPROVED.................... ❑ DENIED......................... .............................................. 19......... 1 r y S~�a ��r •A $_ W. I�� • BOARD OF ASSESSORS CITY HAL.L. PAGI-'-. C11-11 C-1-11 1:14, nllr7Q . ....... ...... 2 V 02 TE06 "0. ........ I ....... It ,11111tll�, CERT:IFYEG.;ABUTTERS LIST` 3 4 3 4 SUBJECT PROPERTY: MAP. .14 LOT,, 0224 SUFF 5 PROPERTY ADDRESS. 0009 CHERRY HILL AVENUE 7 8 7 ...... A ......... ................... t t,,A'PQ(5 fS 08 ... ... ....... ......... 100 .......... .....I I..I I.. Q(J. M) 73 : 4 -14. 0 2.2.'4 0009 CHERRY HILL. AVENUE ANDREA AND KALLIOPI REALTY TRUST 4J ABORN ST 5 K4,F-1491 11:1, AWDREA /KARIO � ,1,,�, l ".� I. .......... :3 � 17 AVE- RRY: HIL L AVEPJAJE, 18 00191; cHE 0 4 ........... 15 ...... 4. o I�Lil 4,1, ZU171 I I J`A�'ZWL-R Q)4�'W T zr I l�20 I It BUONFIGLIO PAUL.. N & MARIE A TRS SAL-Elif 11A 01970 21 0 7 220 .14 0 2 2.2' 000`5 CHERRY HILL AVENUE GUERRETTE PHILIP R 5 CHERRY HILL. AVE G4'1 'F,­RRE'T7p )'I&ft�V r' ��AJFTJ PIA Q'197 24 1-r 1I 3 [YOLi2 .. ........... ' EF LL ..AVEP �7� CHEAR RX, ..... 0 T-CH J-11U, .AVEVE� IUE'l� XJL. 2 ............ EC 9A 27 21 ........ t ott, oI4 1 ..---I I I — ................ ....... .......... 22 CHRISO PEABODY 111A 01960 29 23300 -14 0 20 5 00.1-17 VALLEY STREET L.I TMAN PHILI P -17 VALLEY ST 31 24 1 1 ICTI I F mA nig-m 32 . PAt .... ......... ISTRL)� 33 I.......... CUTZI VA o „rAN TA 21 211 ........... ................... o 35 14 27 ryr. 44 "o, '6"'k, I T mi"T, o, ........ 36 • 28 KAPOGLIS ANDREASI/11"APOGLIS K TRS PEABODY MA 0-1960 37 .29 3 0 3 30 4 31 t ............ """o, 41 ............. ...........4C............... o 42 ft t ......... l 33 43 44 34 45 0 35 4 470 36 48 1 7 37 .. .... t.... I t I I t o:. 41 i. I, It I o 38 ....... . 50 I-m z', ... .... t 39 .......... ..... ":,o ....... ....... ..... ll 52 40 53 0 41 5 550 42 56 43 t ........ .... ... 57 ................. t o” It t ..... 58 .......... •44 45 .......l I so 4681 0 4782 S30 48 B4 ...... 49• 65 0 o Be 5 57 o I�111,11M t 51 52 69 0 53 1. 0 54 Lw 71 72 55 ..... ... 7 • t73 l tl o I 56 PE TER t1 R c, t I I P t GENERAL NOTES: 1. All bidders will be held responsible for the full extent of the work required. 2. Drawn information is provided only to assist the Contractor in establishing ' /x4 EY S the Scope of Work. 3. Do not scale drawings for quantities, lengths, sizes or areas etc. 4. It is not intended that these drawings show every cut, condition etc. of the C building system, however, the Contractor shall furnish a complete product t in accordance with the best practice of the trade to the satisfaction of the Owner and in strict conformance with ail applicable state, Ilocal and safety s building requirements. 5. The Contractor shall report all deviations, changes in dimensions etc. to the Owner. l�/>= lt & o 6. The Contractor shall properly clean-up the site at the end of each working C) day. 7. Each individual Contractor and Sub-Contractor shall properly store all materials, equipment, supplies etc. to be installed on and/or in the building, to prevent damage from weather,vandalism etc. as necessary. Any damage to such materials etc. not properly stored, shall be the full responsibility of that Contractor. 74-o 35 8. The Contractor or Sub-Contractor shall secure the building site at the end 0 of each day, to prevent vandalism,injury etc. 1 "!•� o>`I of z�l I t sErP .�s , Ia o , ID o s f f I N 6 P C .- • f i i j i i t Lor i 0 F NOTE: THE INFORMATION ON THIS SITE PLAN WAS TAKEN FROM A CERTIFIED PLOT PLAN PERFORMED BY: KENNETH J. BOUFFARD ASSOCIATES 94 LYNN STREET PEABODY, MA 01960 ; { DATED: MARCH 21, 1983 t d � n„;e""re Phillip A. Kritikos ng ARCHITECT IOPutnam3treet Peabody,Massachusetts 01960 (508)53I-0055 Client: Scale: Gregory Kapoglis As NOTED 43 Aborn Street Peabody, MA 01960 Date: 7/6/94 Job Nave: Drawn By: Kapoglis Residence P.K. r 9 Cherry Hill Avenue Salem, MA 01970 -Ek-;d By: r Drawing Title: Drawing No. Site Plan & General Notes t i r _ , Li 8r GII O�GK Q 0 _ m 1 -- t; -Ar- I1` ,a &-A DI 14 fzoo�4 MD,ST bt:D M c� 41oX IG 12 x I�} 21100 - v _,-� _ U L tK fit,(pu _NAF— ! - I. I"/I�.�G� R( Vo N1 I P�� Df'Lo�t�► �''L �D�M zt� ICc°x ICpv E ox 40LP 12vX Imo}° 6- c uP N - - sT _ 10 NUl _ 1 OII tl 21O !-Oil T O LI 2 I Z 12 � I � UII I I 12 I-0 11 1.3N 2u�1 Coll I } !-� 2 -� 81-c� \t2- C7-oil : Phillip A. . Kritikos ARCHITECT 10 Putnam Street Peabody,Massachusetts 01960 (508)531-0055 Client: Scale: Gregory Kapoglis As NOTED 43 Abom Street Peabody, MA 01960 Date: 7/6/94 N Job Name: Drawn By: Kapoglis Residence P.K. 9 Cherry Hill Avenue Salem, MA 01970 ck'a By: LlDrawing Titict Drawing No. Floor Plans { i E c q r t t F I 4 7-- A . .._ F h IFp f t `t I +-u � -- - SII �_M�J F-A I I I 1 11 41 LJ L L��A-r �o � Ll 1- 1 it s i _ I — l Drawing Title: Drawing No. 1;levations A - 3 r �-2r.12 Idly s i o 11�G� " I T � -2-,q2 •2 a I ' _ a - ---- I D x - D01 _ L _ _-► L — 6 Q 7C I s c i X r - -T a 3•lvl,- I�i}x IIZJ , a` a . /� I Cid• LVL- 13/,}x112 V1 1 011 i S Arch""t7 Phillip A. Kritikos Planning ARCHITECT 10 Putnam Street Peabody,Massachusetts 01960 (508)531-0055 Client: Scale: Gregory Kapoglis AS NOTED 43 Aborn Street Peabody, MA 01960 Date: 7/6/94 Job Name: Drawn By: Kapoglis Residence P.K. 9 Cherry Hill Avenue Salem, MA 01970 Cl 'a By: Drawing Title: Drawing No. Foundation Plan & First Floor Framing Plan ,/ �J• 2XIZ 5 3-'1�cIL5 �-2x1�•5 14 4b .'2x. 12 ,n ov N I i �y{�..!(,ASS �•�! I���S O l� � o �T-r 'rl•5 7i � , N x 2xI © g \ 1 L iiCn � o J �L •Lv - Sia x 11%2" 6EAM ;Ir - ��� --------------- 10 1O �OIrT S ALU - HATA 2x I2 AIL �s Gt b S x� D - N i c.n•j�-I E t•J A L i � 2x ctr � L ir.l II fiLi ix(oDD NID �D I'NG� n't fzr cv �• 2x12'S � - 2x12: 3-2xIZ 2xrr 11caD sT•LjCS I v ASU r4II.) UIJ1 oo� Loo E I� 05, s�e>FL: _ f I Rs o �rt k i / -�� D �'SILL,I \61i ^N L �- 13 x tl/ ip I I I ,/.. X. I • •,d U �I JOINT. � ( izAb S • 2 WE-4rD'GD W I � Mt<S 14 T' -13 Er/t �T LGA �f-A o p I J 1 ot`I o ' a ' 6(j Lh gun — 0 O /� Drawing No. 00 IU �d o p ,011d p Drawing Title: p w Attic Framing Plan, Roof Framing Plan & Nall Section A - 5 ori 5 rft i F p 1 L ! I -- --. PIAN suoK q Pena g9 Q3 f <.S �Fa✓...0 STREET VALL goo o ) BO�Fi6so� ,1 N�, q h V• v s PD ` Z�.00L J¢ � a LOT 8 Q 12 ,300 S.F. v 11 , 400 S M � GR�cGoRY fl. KF� P �G1-\S LL�r/p g �-H ERRY 1-}\l-L P�vE. / /- 3B 74 9s /Y 3 . _ ,✓zI- E — CHERRY HILL AVE. PLAN OF LAND /jam, „6y c �i fify that the y /oP�r/y ! �7�s s ��r� � r� fo5v :�i�P� IN xisr,rr9 o����slir,�s, o�� w Sys s�o� SALEM MASS. -fes /hoses of fad/ir or P/ev.9 s�j Jv 71h -7 1-7s ,7Pw /0,-- >`or o%! / Sivr� of �� n;�� S ,/ r /o/ AJ ,— 4u—' /1 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED FOR dre� s/iow r�I PREPARED 114 ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES PETER a CAROL KATSARAKES AND REGULATION OF THE REGIST Y OF DEEDS PREPARED BY KENNETH J BnUFFARD ASSOCIATES 94 LYNN STREET PEABODY MASS. SCALE I "= 40 MARCH 21 , 1983 �'"` o is 06 30 40 so :ZD Feef PIAN OU09 1�7 PLPW 89 93 E c.rs �Fe✓.r0� STREE T VALLEY -/.,0 /0�' Ay� Q \V h M � P� a 049.07 LpT B LO-T R 12 .3p0 S.F• vF t' O 11 ,4p0 S � a c N E-RRY H \LL AV c, L4<o LOT „ A / 79 Bs 71- CHERRY 1CHERRY HILL AVE. PLAN OF LAND � . 6/ car fify tfiot the /oP�e fy s��S sGJoc�rl �rP '6 ' /�/PS IN ow�P�-5h.1;o5, &w. , /Ad, 11-�76�s elf sf/ ��fs SALEM MASS. bio fJos� of%af/i< er P/evaf� s1i c-�1s or 'y s a/r�4,r's �sAab/ sli�o� >h q rim ee- /,nv,r ar� or,�n,a,'- poi I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED FOR e;-• �� show .� PREPARED 114 ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES PETER 81 CAROL KATSARAKES AND REGULATION OF THE REGIST Y OF DEEDS -- ' PREPARED BY KENNETH J BOUFFARD ASSOCIATES J 94 LYNN STREET PEABODY MASS. SCALE 1 ' = 40 MARCH 21 , 1983 0 o Feet 1a 26 3o q6 86 p PIAN Papa g9 43 C cb �Fa.......o) S-TREE T VALLEY po p� q h t o P 14 7 LQT B LOT A ^e 12 ,300 S.F. 0 F. M � i GRECTo �� P - KA4uGL \ S' f L�r�O L o T / 79.BS 7/- .,// CHERRY HILL AVE. PLAN OF LAND e6/ e �� fi �y thot the /oP�rdy ;isl�S soy >y �r� f6ia / 47 IN s SALEM MASS. aim f4°sem of hod/ir or -o/ a9 s// or f/la/ l7a dew %IPS �o! �lSrUi7 of "or /,Z� I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED FOR dr <� s`Jew rt PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES PETER a CAROL KATSARAKES rZLS AND REGULATION 0� REGIST� Y 0� F DEEDS �X�-- _ PREPARED BY KENNETH J BOUFFARD ASSOCIATES 94 LYNN STREET PEABODY MASS . n /I SCALE 1 = 40 MARCH 21 , 1983 � i