10 CHARLES STREET - GACHIGNARD, RAY & NORENE - ZBA 10 Charles St. R-2
Ray & Norene Gachignard
�1 c�
�1
nam4b
b T� Titq of "'5ttlem, 'Mttssadjusetts
Poarb of Appeal
krcc.mti�`�'
September 3 1993
YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT AS OF THIS DATE THE DECISION OF THE.
BOARD OF APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK TO
GRANT THE PETITION OF EDWARD GILMARTIN FOR A VARIANCE TO ALLOW
AN EXISTING DECK THAT ENCROACHES ON THE REAR SETBACK TO REMAIN AT
10 CHARLES STREET (R-2)
BOARD OF APPEAL
BRENDA M. SUMRALL
CLERK OF THE BOARD
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE
CITY CLERK.
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section
17, of MGL Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days after the
date of filing of this decision .in the office of the City Clerk.
Pursuant to MGL Chapter 40A. , Section 11, the Variance/Special Permit
granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision
bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed
and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed,
that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex
Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or
is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of title.
Board of Appeal
fFiM
Chi of �ttlem, ussarhusetts
$ nttra of Au{real
' n W
a)
f
7
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF RAY & NORENE GACHIGNARD FOR VARIANCE AT
10 CHARLES STREET (R-2)
A hearing on this petition was held August 11, 1993 with the following
Board Members present: Stephen C. Touchette, V. Chairman; George Ahmed,
Edward Luzinski, Stephen O'Grady and Associate Member Arthur Labrecque.
Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the
hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance
with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter GOA.
Petitioners, owners of the property, are requesting a Variance to allow an
existing deck that encroaches on rear setback to remain as is.
The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding by this
Board that:
1. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the
land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting
other lands, buildings and structures involved.
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would
involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner.
3. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented
at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings
of fact:
1. There was no opposition to the proposed request.
2. The granting of the variance will continue to allow petitioners a fuller
use of their property.
3. It is not feasible to locate the deck in any other portion of the
property.
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF RAY & NORENE GACHIGNARD FOR A VARIANCE AT
10 CHARLES STREET, SALEM
page two
On 'the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented
at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1. Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property
but not the district in general.
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would
involve substantial hardship to the petitioner.
3. Desirable relief can be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the
variance requested, subject to the following conditions:
1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, ordinances,
codes and regulations.
2. All construction shall' be done as per the plans and dimensions
submitted.
3. Petitioner shall comply with all requirements of the Salem Fire
Department relative to smoke and fire safety.
4. Petitioner shall obtain a building permit from the City of Salem
Building Inspector.
5. Exterior finishes of the deck shall be in harmony with the existing
structure.
VARIANCE GRANTED
August 11, 1993
2
Step en O'Grady, Mem er
Board of Appeal _,
w
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF RAY & NORENE GACHIGNARD
FOR VARIANCE AT 10 CHARLES STREET, SALEM
page three
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY
CLERK
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of
the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20
days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City
Clerk. Pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11, the
Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a
copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20
days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has
been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South
Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record
or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title.
Board of Appeal
� CD
c
(City of �tzlem, �Ittssttchusetts
-9ozirb of
ealw
0
777
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF RAY & NORENE GACHIGNARD FOR VARIANCE AT
10 CHARLES STREET (R-2)
A hearing on this petition was held August 11, 1993 with the following
Board Members present: Stephen C. Touchette, V. Chairman; George Ahmed,
Edward Luzinski, Stephen O'Grady and Associate Member Arthur Labrecque.
Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the
hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance
with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioners, owners of the property, are requesting a Variance to allow an
existing deck that encroaches on rear setback to remain as is.
The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding by this
Board that:
1. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the
land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting
other lands, buildings and structures involved.
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would
involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner.
3. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented
at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings
of fact:
1. There was no opposition to the proposed request.
2. The granting of the variance will continue to allow petitioners a fuller
use of their property.
3. It is not feasible to locate the deck in any other portion of the
property.
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF RAY & NORENE GACHIGNARD FOR A VARIANCE AT
10 CHARLES STREET, SALEM
page two
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented
at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1. Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property
but not the district in general.
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would
involve substantial hardship to the petitioner.
3. Desirable relief can be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the
variance requested, subject to the following conditions:
1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, ordinances,
codes and regulations.
2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions
submitted.
3. Petitioner shall comply with all requirements of the Salem Fire
Department relative to smoke and fire safety.
4. Petitioner shall obtain a building permit from the City of Salem
Building Inspector.
5. Exterior finishes of the deck shall be in harmony with the existing
structure.
VARIANCE GRANTED
August 11, 1993 [� p
� �'�t/��1c2i�i1
Stepen O'Grady, Mem er
Board of Appeal _
r �
n p
z�
rl W
.� w
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF RAY & NORENE GACHIGNARD
FOR VARIANCE AT 10 CHARLES STREET, SALEM
page three
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY
CLERK
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of
the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20
days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City
Clerk. Pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11, the
Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a
copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20
days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has
been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South
Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record
or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title.
Board of Appeal
.2
a
-.Dw =
i\\q (C-fil of -,'�ulem ussudtusetts
peal
� o
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF RAY & NORENE GACHIGNARD FOR VARIANCE AT
10 CHARLES STREET (R-2)
A hearing on this petition was held August 11, 1993 with the following
Board Members present: Stephen C. Touchette, V. Chairman; George Ahmed,
Edward Luzinski, Stephen O'Grady and Associate Member Arthur Labrecque.
Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the
hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance
with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter GOA.
Petitioners, owners of the property, are requesting a Variance to allow an
existing deck that encroaches on rear setback to remain as is.
The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding by this
Board that:
1. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the
land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting
other lands, buildings and structures involved.
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would
involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner.
3. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented
at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings
of fact:
1. There was no opposition to the proposed request.
2. The granting of the variance will continue to allow petitioners a fuller
use of their property.
3. It is not feasible to locate the deck in any other portion of the
property.
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF RAY & NORENE GACHIGITARD FOR A VARIANCE AT
10 CHARLES STREET, SALEM
p-age two
:x
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented
at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1. Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property
but not the district in general.
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would
involve substantial hardship to the petitioner.
3. Desirable relief can be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the
variance requested, subject to the following conditions:
1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, ordinances,
codes and regulations.
2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions
submitted.
3. Petitioner shall comply with all requirements of the Salem Fire
Department relative to smoke and fire safety.
4. Petitioner shall obtain a building permit from the City of Salem
Building Inspector.
5. Exterior finishes of the deck shall be in harmony with the existing
structure.
VARIANCE GRANTED
August 11, 1993
9
Step en O'Grady, MemtSer
Board of Appeal
LO
�� m
,� w
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF RAY & NORENE GACHIGNARD
FOR VARIANCE AT 10 CHARLES STREET, SALEM
page three
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY
CLERK
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of
the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20
days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City
Clerk. Pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11, the
Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a
copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20
days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has
been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South
Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record
or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title.
Board of Appeal
2
:7~
ri c. 2A)
�• o
n �o
4)
i
Cittl of ttlem, ttsstttljusetts H
Board of Appeal
-1 i7l
0
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF RAY & NORENE GACHIGNARD FOR VARIANCE AT
10 CHARLES STREET (R-2)
A hearing on this petition was held August 11, 1993 with the following
Board Members present: Stephen C. Touchette, V. Chairman; George Ahmed,
Edward Luzinski, Stephen O'Grady and Associate Member Arthur Labrecque.
Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the
hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance
with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioners, owners of the property, are requesting a Variance to allow an
existing deck that encroaches on rear setback to remain as is.
The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding by this
Board that:
1. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the
land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting
other lands, buildings and structures involved.
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would
involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner.
3. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented
at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings
of fact:
1. There was no opposition to the proposed request.
2. The granting of the variance will continue to allow petitioners a fuller
use of their property.
3. It is not feasible to locate the deck in any other portion of the
property.
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF RAY & NORENE GACHIGNARD FOR A VARIANCE AT
10 CHARLES STREET, SALEM
page two
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented
at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1. Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property
but not the district in general.
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would
involve substantial hardship to the petitioner.
3. Desirable relief can be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the
variance requested, subject to the following conditions:
1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, ordinances,
codes and regulations.
2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions
submitted.
3. Petitioner shall comply with all requirements of the Salem Fire
Department relative to smoke and fire safety.
4. Petitioner shall obtain a building permit from the City of Salem
Building Inspector.
5. Exterior finishes of the deck shall be in harmony with the existing
structure.
VARIANCE GRANTED
August 11, 1993
Step en O'Grady, Memlfer
Board of Appeal rr1
n 'V
cn
'rl Id
O
Co
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF RAY & NORENE GACHIGNARD
FOR VARIANCE AT 10 CHARLES STREET, SALEM
- page three
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY
CLERK
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of
the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and. shall be filed within 20
days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City
Clerk. Pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11, the
Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a
copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20
days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has
been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South
Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record
or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title.
Board of Appeal
tC: 2y
JO
N
_ ZY
4J
(City oftzlem, ttssuthusetts
Bonra of Atrpettl
w
0
Lg
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF RAY & NORENE GACHIGNARD FOR VARIANCE AT
10 CHARLES STREET (R-2)
A hearing on this petition was held August 11, 1993 with the following
Board Members present: Stephen C. Touchette, V. Chairman; George Ahmed,
Edward Luzinski, Stephen O'Grady and Associate Member Arthur Labrecque.
Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the
hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance
with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioners, owners of the property, are requesting a Variance to allow an
existing deck that encroaches on rear setback to remain as is.
The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding by this
Board that:
1. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the
land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting
other lands, buildings and structures involved.
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would
involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner.
3. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented
at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings
of fact:
1. There was no opposition to the proposed request.
2. The granting of the variance will continue to allow petitioners a fuller
use of their property.
3. It is not feasible to locate the deck in any other portion of the
property.
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF RAY & NORENE GACHIGNARD FOR A VARIANCE AT
10 CHARLES STREET, SALEM
page two
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented
at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1. Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property
but not the district in general.
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would
involve substantial hardship to the petitioner.
3. Desirable relief can be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the
variance requested, subject to the following conditions:
1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, ordinances,
codes and regulations.
2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions
submitted.
3. Petitioner shall comply with all requirements of the Salem Fire
Department relative to smoke and fire safety.
4. Petitioner shall obtain a building permit from the City of Salem
Building Inspector.
5. Exterior finishes of the deck shall be in harmony with the existing
structure.
VARIANCE GRANTED
August 11, 1993
Stepen O'Grady, Mem er
Board of Appeal
aw
C5
�o �
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF RAY & NORENE GACHIGNARD
FOR VARIANCE AT 10 CHARLES STREET, SALEM
Page three
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY
CLERK
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of
the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20
days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City
Clerk. Pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11, the
Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a
copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20
days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has
been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South
Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record
or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title.
Board of Appeal
r�C 4
a
n t.o
(liitn of �ttlem, �ttssttCl�usPtt�
s -Sourb of ,.Aupenl
,T
0
a
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF RAY & NORENE GACHIGNARD FOR VARIANCE AT
10 CHARLES STREET (R-2)
A hearing on this petition was held August 11, 1993 with the following
Board Members present: Stephen C. Touchette, V. Chairman; George Ahmed,
Edward Luzinski, Stephen O'Grady and Associate Member Arthur Labrecque.
Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the
hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance
with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioners, owners of the property, are requesting a Variance to allow an
existing deck that encroaches on rear setback to remain as is.
The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding by this
Board that:
1. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the
land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting
other lands, buildings and structures involved.
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would
involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner.
3. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented
at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings
of fact:
1. There was no opposition to the proposed request.
2. The granting of the variance will continue to allow petitioners a fuller
use of their property.
3. It is not feasible to locate the deck in any other portion of the
property.
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF RAY & NORENE GACHIGNARD FOR A VARIANCE AT
10 CHARLES STREET, SALEM
page two
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented
at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1. Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property
but not the district in general.
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would
involve substantial hardship to the petitioner.
3. Desirable relief can be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the
variance requested, subject to the following conditions:
I. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, ordinances,
codes and regulations.
2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions
submitted.
3. Petitioner shall comply with all requirements of the Salem Fire
Department relative to smoke and fire safety.
4. Petitioner shall obtain a building permit from the City of Salem
Building Inspector.
5. Exterior finishes of the deck shall be in harmony with the existing
structure.
VARIANCE GRANTED
August 11, 1993
��
?e
�' i�f
Stepn O'Grady, Mem er
Board of Appeal _
r "<
T O LQ
o0
�� m
C� �.O
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF RAY & NORENE GACHIGNARD
FOR VARIANCE AT 10 CHARLES STREET, SALEM
page three
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY
CLERK
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of
the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20
days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City
Clerk. Pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11, the
Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a
copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20
days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has
been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South
Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record
or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title.
Board of Appeal
C5
_ L"a
4J
of Salem, 4Rttssttdjusetfs
\` F Ponrb of 'Atrpeul
hl..l.n\✓y' I
September 3 1993
YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT AS OF THIS DATE THE DECISION OF THE
BOARD OF APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK TO
GRANT THE PETITION OF EDWARD GILMARTIN FOR A VARIANCE TO ALLOW
AN EXISTING DECK THAT ENCROACHES ON THE REAR SETBACK TO REMAIN AT
10 CHARLES STREET (R-2)
BOARD OF APPEAL
BRENDA M. SUMRALL
CLERK OF THE BOARD
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE
CITY CLERK.
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section
17, of MGL Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days after the
date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk.
Pursuant to MCL Chapter 40A. , Section 11, the Variance/Special Permit
granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision
bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed
and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed,
that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex
Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or
is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of title.
Board of Appeal
/ I
ATE OE
PETITIONER
_OCATION _2
MOTION: TO GRANT SECOND
h
TO DENY SECOND
TO RE-HEAR SECOND
LEAVE TO WITHDRAW SECOND
'70 CONTINUE SECOND
POLL CALL PRESENT GRANT
DENY WITHDRAW RE-HEAR CONTINUE
STEPHEN O'GRADY
GEORGE A. AHMED
EDWARD LUZINSKI ✓
STEPHEN TOUCHETTE
ASSOC; TE 'MEMBERS
R6P''I['Si'L•'
ARTHUR LABRECOUE
CONDITIONS:
I -
APPEAL CASE NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(�t#g of �$ttlrnt, Ansoadjuse##s
s�
TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS:
The Undersigned,r$presePt that he is are the owners of a certain parcel of land loca1�d
at NO. . ./.Q. . .0 LRS!PS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Street; Zoning District. l�.�. .
I . and said parcel is affected by Section(s) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
of the Massachusetts State Building Code.
Plans describing the work proposed, have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in
accordance with Section IX A. 1 of the Zoning Ordinance.
rn C5
pA, O"n O
® V, W W
W
W e Cn ma b.
mc,
CZ,
3 ca
=a tz
CD v
The Application for Permit was denied by the Inspector of Buildings for the following
reasons: p p�
The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem
Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to
approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said
Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary
hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero-
gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for
the following reasons:
VO rl n c-�_7
Owner. . .. . .!�6? lam, ,U.. .. .
CACI-(' S
Address. �.Q. . .C.�.L./. . . .��. . .a� . . . . . . . . . .
Telephone. . .7/. (. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Petitioner. . . �- . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • •
/ Address. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Da,te. . . . . . . . Telephone. 9.. Q . . . . . . . . . .
„" BY..Yt JC ' C. . . . . . .
Three copies of the application must be filed with the Secretary of the Board of
Appeals with a check, for advertising in the amount of. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . .
four weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals. Check payable to The
Evening News.'
.�
~
�
^ �
N0- . �
------.---'
~ � '
/
�
PETITION T0BOARD 0FAPPEALS
LOCATION
- �
-^--'`-----------,^---- �
�
PBT|T7ONEK-,`.------,,--.
�
&DDRBSS-.,------``.-..,. �
�
�
............................................
C0NDl|l0NJ
......^������. ..,............`....,........
^----'--' -`^------^``^^^
�
---~`^`--``^------^``^^`^
`~`~'-`````------'-`~~~~.
~~-~^.-.,------~..~~^^.-.
......................
,PETITION APPROVED....................
��
D5N[ED---,,,,.-.
u
-................... ........................... lY......... '
+^
\
�� �
i
MORTGAGE INSPECTION
BAY STATE SURVEYING ASSOCIATES
234 CABOT ST., BEVERLY MA
LOCATION NOTES:
SCALE I" = 20 FT. DATE -TULy_�Q (�fZ_ -This is a Mortgage Inspection survey and not an
f instrument survey,therefore this plot plan is for
REFERENCE -Q�GQ-�i�..g242yZ.��8....... mortgage inspection purposes only.
Co�eDEl�J.A)-7Hff. 9�454E�FK_•__ -This survey is based on survey marks of others.
-Bushes, shrubs,fences and tree lines do not
necessarily indicate property lines.
To tq-4'.. ................ .In my professional opinion the building(s)are not located
I hereby certify that I have examined the premises and that the in the special flood hazard zone, as defined by H.U.D.
building(s) shown on this plan are located on the ground as -Whenever an offset is 1'f or less, an instrument survey
shown and that they conformed to the zoning setbacks of the is recommended to determine prop. lines.
G!TX_ QF SRC.�K(_ when cppnstructed. -Offsets shown are approximate by tape survey.
�'L-PT DECI_
DECK- 00cES ,uOT Coiner-X
Wr71-1 30• 12EA2 s£r8ACK. 4027- LOT-
Lor
OTLor //1
(A)eE A = 4000 S.F±)
i aEC K I r,
LoT o Lo2
110
Bio
i9't
50.0 L,
i
CNARL�S 67-)ZEE7-
'�Xpl1 N 0!4,
O� f
o ROQERT `N
T
0
O�
'r PIsrinlo
ANO
a
x
u
APPEAL CASE NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
of '�$ttt>em, 'Mttssari usetts
- �Ruttrb of �ppral
TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS:
The Undersigne e re e t that he is are the owners of a certain parcel of land located
at NO. . Io. . . . . r�� . . . . . . . . . . . . .Street; Zoning District. -. .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : and said parcel is affected by Section(s ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
of the Massachusetts State Building Code.
Plans describing the work proposed, have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in
accordance with Section IX A. 1 of the Zoning Ordinannc�e.�
1C-
a a
� p.)
CM Cn
Ca Ln w y n "-
C? re Cw 1A CA
c o m G
rco o�
an U
W
The Application for Permit was denied by the Inspector of Buildings for the following
reasons:
The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem
Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to
approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said
Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary
hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero-
gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for
the following reasons:
V�'l al7zZe
�e�r iceh�
n /
Owner_ . . . �/ Qo 1�e,1,;�r. -
Address. .. . . . . (/�/`/ ` . � �. . : . . . . . . . . .
Tel ephone. . .-7.�. .`�.. .7 q S . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Petitioner. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
7' 6,' Address. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Date. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Tel pho e. �j. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Byd. . . . . . . . . . . .
Three copies of the application must be filed with he Secretary of the Board of
Appeals with a check, for advertising in the amount of. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . .
four weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals. Check payable to The
Evening News.
NO....................................
PETITION TO BOARD OF APPEALS
LOCATION
................................................................
PETITIONER..........................................
ADDRESS...............................................
................................................
CONDITIONS
........................... ....................................
........................ .......................................
...............................................................
.................................................................
.................................................................
.................................................................
,P.ETITION APPROVED.................... ❑
DENIED......................... 0
.............................................. 19.........
,11 90 a A
AVE. 1e ie 75 216 w
9
49 no O w
REST m 19 49g4
FO `
❑ 182 $ g 6800
5z50 a g 3655
Bz � _
s 181 ❑$ 198 9000
20
11 8 184 5250 5250 $ 1 126p0 z 3 01
5250 60
0
10 l 2.2
5250 aft a 760
Ilzll uN 32 0 1 $ ':r� a 5202 gp00 $ 11 0
1 1 m IB 5250 w2 m 0100 1 •�;
1 A 5250 0 196$ j8'
1 1 °
187 178 $ 'm
1 I u 5250 2' $ 14 00 4000 'D 4480 I a
$ 5250
fE"COLLEGE a
,VG AREA ° 177 s $ 20 4000 8 22q 218 60 a 1
1 1 a 6� 5932 420 4400 a w 6/70
6 q 1 E
194 2q0
Il mll 54 6 w w 3713 a "N 'e-e
684
A /�002 $II D
IIS
3 I ♦ ,
S 400 $ m 1 $189 5o 1750 36'9 1 w D
1 1 5,250 53 5, 10
m
124 11 ye ST. " 5500 9 ° p �p0 "1
� < /2�0
13.20 A61 AT L A M I I C i°p -�
/o� 22 550 m
4
7 ,' 7200
\ SEWER EASEMENT —— _ lore ' / i •,
1 (1\c\\ 12465 LC / by N w
1 £1 \ 1 \`IO Ah y
IIA11 11 11 - / // /� ��� ppp po �� �°• Sr ¢' � � O
1 1 101 � / i .b' bo 4g R�• l
1 1 1 1 /O/, ,p p 0J"yM1 �p1\ •ehv'
1 I I 1 /'� /• � � d' � O.9 � '4 6 O
�I 1 1 1 �ti oo p Q• n°
1 II 11 -1 p` \�ti 0 Otho oi� OrOno SALE M
1 11 I 11 11 `�OpO 'VoySTATE
+ n' p 10 19y� y COLLEGI
ml nao O 1y V TBM 3522
11 1 11 zll o ('p' n° $ 9y C 50.37
• lb e0 no
o v l 1 11 a Phy1 009 + \19
+
1 31 I \yh a d?ho
e
s CHIMNEY
G
1.3
\`LOG
�h00 O \U`0 it
v
PIP �,o " / PARKING
poo \h000�
b� 00
O as J` z A
90 \09'5 %` s O h50
a
Ali
501
4 G ?91 v
1 /
4P SENN
60
BOARD OF ASSESSORS
CITY HALL PAGE-
A
2 ..........
a
CERTIFIED ^ABUTTERS LIST
4 q Il Z ......
4 SUBJECT PROPERTY: MAP: 32 LOT: 0111 SUFF-
0 5 PROPERTY ADDRESS: 0010 CHARLES STREET 7
.. .... ......... ORENE, ......
M A PROh
O p . ......
3
R
4 •
2 32 01.1.1 0010 CHARLES STREET GACHIGNARD RAYMOND L 10 CHARLES ST 15
13 11 114,INORENE., ISAL.FN P
......I. I 1 17
46 ;CHARLES ST 411111"I'll,1,'111
CHRISTINE I ......
.......l,32
19
KIIII, I lsAt,.EM-MA,,0 1,9701 1. 1 1,....... .. ....I.....
4 1 664
i a,
. ......
:5
:F, IX.I
I.I...I. I....I. , , 4 e I,1% !o
FF:r 21
7 SALEM MA 0-1971� 23/ 22 •
• :a 32 0105 0038 CHARLES STREET LATUSEK GRAZYNA 38 CHARLES ST✓
24
9.
Ra, r-pi t4d A4,97R
•
71777 $<21IIIIIIIIIIII...... 25
203^ 0106! M � 003UL6§
NI, I I I
26
•
IRI
.
. SALEM
ALEWMA`0 1970,
I I 27
21
28
22 29
•23
SALEM MA 01970 3
24 32 0108 0026 CHARLES STREET RYAN GORDON J P 0 Box 844 310
32
5 •
33
2 .... ...I,
34
3^ 01tl9' 2- HAR
C...I,L-p�, ,"e�."I'. . "�I��"�,"I I'-':� , , I I �.......
26 HA 0;0 1 St I
i 2 "�i, �]" ""," l�, I - 35
......... .........-, I — 0
............. HEL ISE',,,, .........
...................... .. ....... .......
27 ...... SALEM
....... I I...... 361
28 —---- ---- - 31
DRISCOLL NICHOLAS J JR SALE3
M MA 01970 :
32 0112 0008 CHARLES STREET ONEILL WILLIAM P JR 13 SUNSET ROAD 3.
3: 40
3 ...... -,, C-E.,�ZABETH G ....... ........
.........I ........
32 tl113'
41
.............
8 ROC .......
�Nk ROBERT:;L
OQQb 0%illt U
•12 1
43
01 ......
42
"I......................
33
..........
SA MA T7
..........
II lbbb 44 •
W— ...... S5
A' ———
34 6"M 45
•3 MOSCA DAVID, J SALEM MA 01970 460
1: 32 0119 0007 DAY AVENUE HUGHES CHARLES J 7 DAY AVE 47
...........
. . ......
1
.....IIIII
II ........I.I I
I 48
38 % 2, DAY" V49
39 BERTHA 51
52
...... ........
94 1 "A VF-Nj'1r- q 5A1 TH"OF I I I s-
041 TRUSTEE OF STATE COLLEGE SALEM MA 01970 54 53
42 32 0088 0016 LORING AVENUE POWER WALTER 8 111 18 LURING AVE N 55
56
q4f. z
57
.......... ......
II -,;t'"CANAL I S'T'REET 1 -2, 1 1 1 1 1,1 MASS"COMMOF 58
ONWEAUTH ........
0 44 0124;......
,1,
TRUSTEES COL ne... I.I. ;SAL
1970
59
s.s
1'%'11 21IN
AR' bIi"dF 0
4 , I� I I I
..........1. P
..........
46 61
•47 62
63 •
48 64
49 77�
65
6
..........
0 6
............-
.................
............... 671•
52 69
11 •• 53 71
54 72
55 ......1 73
..... =7777",
56
74
PETER; ft."I GARON
............
......... qw
e7
29