The URL can be used to link to this page

5 CEDAR HILL ROAD - CARFAGNO, LEON JACKSON & CHERYL - ZBA 5 Cedar Hill Rd. R_1 Leon Jackson & Cheryl Carfagno r ('fitu of "$ttlem, Httss�ztljusetts July 3, 1991 Notice is hereby given that as of July 2, 1991 the decision of the Board of Appeal has been filed in the office of the City Clerk to grant the petition of Leon Jackson & Chery Carfagno for variances to allow construction of an addition at 5 Cedar Hill Road. BOARD OF APPEAL Brenda M. Sumrall - Clerk of the Board Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Mass. General Laws, Chapter 808,and shall be filed within 20 days after the date:of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to Mass. General Laic, Ch�prer 808, Sertion 11, the Variance or Special Permit.granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision, bearing the certification of the Cty Clea k that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been flied, or that, if such appeal has been filed,that it has been dismisse& or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name or the owner of record or Is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. BOARD OF APPEAL °4 Cit" 111 ~:111'TTi. : icI55clCliuB£ItG z 57 -- CITY SS DECISION ON THE PETITION OF LEON JACKSON & CHERYL CARFAGNO FOR VARIANCE AT 5 CEDAR HILL ROAD (R-1 ) A hearing on this petition was held June 26, 1991 with the following Board Members present: Richard Bencal, Chairman; Richard Febonio, Edward Luzinski, Mary Jane Stirgwolt and Associate Member Ronald Plante. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioners, owners of the property, are requesting a Variance from side setback reauirements to allow construction of an addition in this R-1 district. The Variance which has been requested can be granted upon a finding of the Board that: a. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings and structures in the same district. b. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner. c. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1 . -here was no opposition to this petition. 2. The proposed addition would enhance the petitioners quality of life. 3. This is the most feasible location for the proposed addition. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1 . Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property but not the district in general. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Ordinance would involve substantial hardship on the petitioners. 3. The relief requested can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. r9 DECISION ON THE PETITION OF LEON JACKSON & CHERYL CARFAGNO FOR VARIANCE AT 5 CEDAR HILL ROAD, SALEM page two Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the Variance requested, subject to the following conditions: 1 . All construction be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted. 2. all construction be in compliance with city and state building codes. 3. Exterior finishes of the proposed addition be compatible with the existing structure. 4. A building permit be obtained. 5. A Certificate of Occupancy be obtained. 6. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety be strictly adhered to. Variance Granted June 26, 1991 s / R Achard Febonio, Member, Board of Appeal A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK gppeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 Of 07 . Chapter 808, and shall be filed within 20 days the Mass. General Laws, "- e office of tCiC ..iter the datr.of filing of this decision in thhe thevar ante Pursuant t0 tdass. General Lays, Cheater 608. section 11, of the or ?pecial Permit granted herein shad not take 'tlrct until a cop nave decision, b^_arinP the certification of the City Clerk that 20 dl Ins been Cr') _ eul has been tiled, or that, if such app'. ,lapsed and no app N tiled, that it has been dismissed or denied s recor me or the in the South Essex `-' Registry of Deeds and indexed under the no he owner of record or r's Certificate of Tillie.is recorded and noted On the ovme BOARD OF APPEAL j (E It" of :zlrm x��7tituseItG BanrO of AUL J S7 -SS DECISION ON THE PETITION OF LEON JACKSON & CHERYL CARFAGNO FOR VARIANCE AT 5 CEDAR HILL ROAD (R-1 ) A hearing on this petition was held June 26, 1991 .with the following Board Members present: Richard Bencal, Chairman; Richard Febonio, Edward Luzinski, Mary Jane Stirgwolt and Associate Member Ronald Plante. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioners, owners of the property, are requesting a Variance from side setback requirements to allow construction of an addition in this R-1 district. 'Phe Variance which has been requested can be granted upon a finding of the Board • hat: a. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or Structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings and structures in the same district. b. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner. c. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1 . There was no opposition to this petition. 2. The proposed addition would enhance the petitioners quality of life. 3. This is the most feasible location for the proposed addition. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1 . Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property but not the district in general. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Ordinance would involve substantial hardship on the petitioners. 3. The relief requested can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. 1 �� 1 ' r DECISION ON THE PETITION OF LEON JACKSON & CHERYL CARFAGNO FOR VARIANCE AT 5 CEDAR HILL ROAD, SALEM page two Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the variance requested, sub,41ect to the following conditions: 1 . All construction be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted. 2. all construction be in compliance with city and state building codes. 3. Exterior finishes o' the proposed addition be compatible with the existing structure. 4. A building permit be obtained. 5. A Certificate of Occupancy be obtained. 6. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety be strictly adhered to. Variance Granted dune 26, 1991 // ) Richard Febonio, Member, Board of Appeal A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, it any, shall be made pursuant to Section days tlP cn the Mass. General Laws, Chapter °GR• and shall be filed within 20 days U. ::;ter the date-Of filing of this decision in the Otlice of the City Clerk. :._ Ghonte! 6o8, Section it. the Variance e r _ Pursuant to Mass. General laws, of to or ecia1 Permit granted herein snail not take effect until a copyhave JOaaion, b,•arinP, the certification of the City Cif,K thaie, t 0 dacaj ys have been elapsed and no appeal has been filed. or that, N hkti, that it has been dismisseJ or dent e is recorded in o the South Essex -':l Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name or the owner of record or _i is recorded and noted on the ovmer's Certificate of Title. BOARD OF APPEAL' I t a ( itr of '.nirm _��s��,ctntsrtt� - iT'; S DECISION ON THE PETITION OF LEON JACKSON & CHERYL CARFAGNO FOR VARIANCE AT 5 CEDAR HILL ROAD (R-1 ) A hearing on this petition was held June 26, 1991 .with the following Board Members present: Richard Eencal, Chairman; Richard Febonio, Edward Luzinski, Mary .lane Stirgwolt and Associate Member Ronald Plante. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 4OA. Petitioners, owners of the property, are requesting a Variance from side setback requirements to allow construction of an addition in this R-1 district. The Variance which has been requested can be granted upon a finding of the Eoard that: a. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings and structures in the same district. b. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner. c. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1 . There was no opposition to this petition. 2. The proposed addition would enhance the petitioners quality of life. 3. This is the most feasible location for the proposed addition. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1 . Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property but not the district in general. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Ordinance would involve substantial hardship on the petitioners. 3. The relief requested can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. l -ECISIOH ON THE PETITION OF LEON JACKSON & CHERYL CARFAGNO FOR VARIANCE AT 5 CEDAR HILL ROAD, _-A.LE1 -awe two Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the variance requested, subject to the following conditions: All construction be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted. 2. all construction be in compliance with city and state building codes. Exterior finishes or the proposed addition be compatible with the existing structure. ;. A building permit be obtained. : . A Certificate of Occupancy be obtained. 6. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety be strictly adhered to. Variance Granted rune 26. 1991 R-fchard Febonio, Member, Board of Appeal A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK rn Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Sectiodays n 17(it all the the date ofal Laws,fil ng of this decisiter on innthehoftioc o'f the�C fly ClDcrianc r'- the Variance u of the r+ Pursuant to idass. General Laws, Ch^.ntlo Eake Section 11, Special Permit Sran,ed herein �:huil not take eth�ct until a cop have decision, ,oaring, the certification et the City Clerk t"tch p 0 d'cni ho; been %'.apsed and no apPeal has ,een filed, or that,r N hlcd, that it has been dismisseJ or denied i, recorded in the So re Eseez Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name or the owner of record or _j is recorded and noted on the ow mer's Certificate of TiIIG. v _ 130ARD OF APYFAL t' . s V D / DATE OF HEARING PETITIONER_ %� LOCATION MOTION: TO GRANT SECOND TO DENY SECOND TO RE-HEAR SECOND LEAVE TO WITHDRAW SECOND TO CONTINUE SECOND ROLL CALL PRESENT GRANT DENY WITHDRAW RE-HEAR CONTINUE RICHARD BENCAL J�stfH-�BRftfiVT I RICHARD`'FEBONIO EDWARD LU MSKI MARY JANE STTRGWOLT ASSOCIATE MEMBERS RONALD PLANTS A CONDITIONS: 0 61 S C, o ' u�r,.cawipb a C�it� of Jire Department 3` vabgnarierz u�. 4$ Izifinefte ?treet sulem, Joseph F. Sullivan An. 111970 Chiet City of Salem Date: June 26, 1991 Board of Appeal One Salem Green RE: 5 Cedar Hill Road Lean Jackson arid,Cheryl Carfagno Salem, MA 01970 The Salem Fire Department has no objection to the granting of a Special Permit and/or Variance to allow: congtrnc+ion of an addition. subject to the following conditions: 1- This property (has no) %M tA* conpliance with the provisions of the Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 148, Section 26E, relative to the installation of automatic smoke detectors. The applicant will be required to contact the Salem Fire Preven- tion Bureau in order to bring their dwelling up to code relative to automatic smoke dete�tnrg_ 2- Plans for the proposed construction are to be presented to the Salem Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. 3- The proposed construction shall conform to all applicable provisions of the Massa- chusetts State Building Code, the Salem Fire Prevention Code, 527CMR(Code of Massa- chuestts Regulations) , the Salem City Ordinances, and Massachusetts General Laws relative to fire and public safety. 4- The applicant and/or contractor shall arrange for an inspection by the Salem Fire Prevention Bureau upon completion of the work. S' d, P. LaPoint�4�11�2j ��o��iG�rman e Fire Inspector cc: file applicant x1itu of "`�Oafem' assuchuslett5 cAire Department �ieabquarters umrt 48 ` :afgette *reef Joseph F. Sullivanbulem, n. 01970 Chief City of Salem Date: June 26, 1991 Board of Appeal One Salem Green RE: 5 Cedar Hill Road Leon Jackson and Cheryl Carfagno Salem, MA 01970 The Salem Fire Departnent has no objection to the granting of a Special Permit and/or Variance to allow: construction ni= an addition. subject to the following conditions: 1- This property (has no) '' compliance with the provisions of the Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 148, Section 26E, relative to the installation of automatic smoke detectors. The auolicant will be required to contact the Salem Fire Preven- H on_Bureau in order to bring their dwelling i ng up to code relative to automatic smoke datarrtnre_ 2- Plans for the proposed construction are to be presented to the Salem Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. 3- The proposed construction shall conform to all applicable provisions of the Massa- chusetts State Building Code, the Salem Fire Prevention Code, 527CMR(Code of Massa- chuestts Regulations) , the Salem City Ordinances, and Massachusetts General Laws relative to fire and public safety. 4- The applicant and/or contractor shall arrange for an inspection by the Salem Fire Prevention Bureau upon completion of the work. �/ 1 '91 -- ��rman P. LaPointe Fire Inspector cc: file applicant APPEAL CASE NO. . . . . . .. ... . . . .. . . . . . . . . . of 15ttlent, fflttssar4usetts curb of �kppral �om,c TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS: The Undersi nedepresent tha �}i€—�� are the owners of a certain parcel of land located at NO. . •5. .F .9-d- - - Nf. ��. . .A. . . 7t. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Street; Zoning District.0 . . . . . . . • • . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • . • . . . . . . . . ; and said parcel is affected by Section(s) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . of the Massachusetts State Building Code. Plans describing the work proposed, have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings, in accordance with Section IX A. 1 of the Zoning Ordinance. r Q tA p� 2 J - Q } -R •sma QP a vi �i- d.CA C an w ZR na C cy to The Application for Permit was denied by the Inspector of Buildings for the following reasons: ( � .._e Q, The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero- gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for the following reasons: Owner. .?o.i?./2// .Jg4/ / //�[ C . .. . . . . Address SC. A f-. .f�f Y. "`U .:. . . . . . . . . . . . Telephone.(!I S.4k) 71-/,5. . `P . . . ... . . . � Peti ti on�er,?-`tPo��j?. 1,1.':� Address". . �.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Telephone/.5 68 ) .7`i5�.(P.0 . . . . . . . . . . By` . ... . Three copies of the application must be filed with the Secretary of the Board of Appeals with a check, for advertising in the amount of. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . four weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals. Check payable to The Evening News. � . ^ ` NO-.-------~~� � � � PEI IT|0NT0BOARD 8FAPPEALS ^ ` � l{)[kIK}N ` � � `-------------------~' � � 7EIlT|0N[K........ ....... _,_-----� , � � ' ' &DDKE3S .......- .......... -- ... -..... � ..............'.........'....... ....... � CONDI lIONS ~ '-^^--'--- -----------' ~ ........................ ....................................... � -~'-.-^---------'--^-~. �� -^~-' ' .............................................................. ~ ~ .............................................................. , � PETITION APPROVED.................... �� _ DF�|5D -------- K~� _ � � )9... ` ' � � � � | , I / \ 1 .LOT /17 s CLCELJA C. SfIA� iiREF, = 6Lyosi. ,` 9 CEDAP— HILL LOT l/�0 5' ♦ �pPoy� �o�� PRULi6;A:il CROtJG'-L s t, ' ' V` 4iA'v i 3 cEDAP-HI LL RD. t i O c�,-"' ya �i its u �y 31 I 55. C� ;�tUMBt REFEE TO C'" O>= _M t-Z9ESScps' MAp Ll . cc• 87 l.1 <'C. 30, 740 . 102 88 15,64 / N AD / C / / o � o r -REET ---- ----------------- goo Jo `� /°J �,\2 �' 041 70 90 100 49-9 e9-9 72 / 9 6400 Z a h 7766 79 70 173 69 826271 \\OQO 13140 � , 9 'I6ao �laa r Za`, g5 0, ��p0 J1510 p OqO �e c 116 77 Q o e ° 12,732 ! / _ 2/p „ Cf0412 v mo � CREsr m �B!9f5J <,"%GNG. ' 17�o i0 ' mO 54 m m Q I(�I0,726 P ly1 o 0 X g 75 0 '►J 21 c —yJ 66 26 O• � /9• /ea KELLEY R04 1)041) 9 �o _ IItit / 7.450 0 :� J 1 e° g '. y 2. v Gk• 50 ae \tiaa ZcZ7O \ / U LOT /17 s CL CEUA E, SHAR�2GL'G i4REA = 66'/o;s1 . 9 CEDAP IF/LC. 2D. ' s.T OF 0-a C)P .ion Z�. d CR0to LL 3 CEW2,HIZ-L RD- O b bCy 4.6 lo.i g-1µ 5 #5 key 13, LOT NUH@EES REFeZ 7a Ci" ot- snLE-M asstSSC2,S' M,9A Ll . REFERENCE. - PLOT PLAN OF LAND DEED: REC. BK. 9985 PG. 317 PLAN: 2r-. 36 PL , 11 LOCATED IN I CERTIFY THAT THE BUILDING (S) S/ 1 L Elp HEREON ARE LOCATED ON THE GROUND -VA 0;: g`Ac AS SHOWN. �� GAIL yO� PREPARED FOR L. LEON D. JT9CC SON E SMITH CHE2YL A , CAZFAGAJ0 zo s 9No.35043o SCALE: I "= 20 ' 1�7AY zo, 199/ DATE REG. PROFESSIONAL LAND SUR VEYO STEP ss/ANAL LAND`'JQ NORTH SHORE SURVEY CORP. 209 WASHINGTON ST. - SALEM, MA. O �3 LOT /!8 LOT' /17 s CECELlA E. Shfqp, ,OC – ,4RER = 6G'lO�t, 9 CEDR,P_ NlLC ,2D- a ti• s ^ LOT //C-� 5' SCG .4,iOn i /RUL H• RE (3ECGR L a 'rb,1 �o° a� C/iO4)c— 3 �fE49,E HILL RD. �t r r ti:/r b ray 131 SuX SS . 5:. Lor NUHQ0_>S REFEI?. TU C17 / OP- SnC.EM ,1S9ESSCPS' MAP 2,I . REFERENCE: - PLOT PLAN OF LAND DEED: REC. BK. g 9 g 5 PG. 3-7 7 PLAN: 2r–. 3(� pt_ . rl LOCATED IN p I CERTIFY THAT THE BUILDING (S) S/ I E/ HEREON ARE LOCATED ON THE GROUND AS SHOWN. ��jNOrMsq� PREPARED FOR (� I1 �y f �° GAIL y6N LEON D. J7ACC,50O J e 20 �l )� Y �Yday SMITH C/yERYL Al Cl92.F.9GAiO ITH SCALE: 1 = zo MAv zo 199/ DATE REG. PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR pow ➢N o.35043 �o Fss/ /ST NORTH OQ,� NORTH SHORE SURVEY CORP. 0'vAl(ANDS 209 WASHINGTON ST. - SALEM, MA. &7/ } l` --� CITY OF SALEM 4, BOARD OF APPEAL 1 795-9595 Ext. 381 'I Will hold a public hearing for all persons inter-'{{ �i ested in the petition submitted by LEON JACK-q �.. SON&CHERYL CARFAGNO for Variance from j —side setback to allow an addition m 5 CEDAR HILL d RD.(R-1).Said hearing to be held WEDNESDAY, - r„ JUNE 26,1991 at 7:00 P.M.,ONE SALEM GREEN, .� 2nd floor. RICHARD A. BENCAL, Chairman `.. [ `'t June'12, 19, 1991 't r + L. CITY OF SALEM BOARD OF APPEAL ' Will hold a 745-9595 Ext. 381 public hearing for all persons inter- ested in the petition submitted by LEON JACK. SON etCHERYL CARFAGNO for Variance from side setback to allow an addition at 5 CEDAR HILL JUN 26,1991d t 7:00 P M.,ONheari, toE WEDNESDAY, ,I 2nd floor. EM GREEN, .� I June 12, 19 RICHARD A. BENCAL, Chairman 1991 +Nn ' II - ` CITY OF SALEM k BOARD OF APPEAL 745-9595 Ext. 381 Will hold a public hearing for all persons inter- ested in the petition submitted by LEON JACK- SON&CHERYL CARFAGNO for Variance from side setback to allow an addition at 5 CEDAR HILL i RD.(R-1).Said hearing to be held WEDNESDAY, I JUNE 26,1991 at 7:00 P.M.,ONE SALEM GREEN, I 2nd floor. RICHARD A. BENCAL, Chairman I June 12, 19, 1991 �� t — CITY OF SALEM .� 1 BOARD OF APPEAL 745-9595 Ext. 3 Will hold a public hearing for all persons inter- ested in the petition submitted by LEON JACK- 11' ' 11 SON&CHERYL CARFAGNO for Variance from .{ side setback to allow an addition at - AR HI RD.(R-1).Said hear' LL I mg to be held WEDNESDAY M GREEN, r JUNE 26,1991 at 7:00 P.M.,ONE SALE , -I 2nd Boor. 14 June 12,-19, 1991 RICHARD A. BENCAL, Chairman :'. ' CITY OF SALEM ,. BOARD OF APPEAL 745-9595 Ext. 381 k Will hold a public hearing for all persons inter- ested in the petition submitted by LEON JACK- SON&CHERYL CARFAGNO for Variance from side setback to allow an addition at 5 CEDAR HILL �F !. RD.(R-1).Said hearing to be held WEDNESDAY, ` JUNE 26,1991 at 7:00 P.M.,ONE SALEM GREEN, p 2nd floor. RICHARD A. BENCAL, Chairman !6�;", June 12, 19, 1991 I APPEAL CASE NO. . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . CtV, of �$ttlem, fflttssar4usetts TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS: h The Undersignedrgpresent that are the owners of a certain parcel of land loaed e L{ at NO. . . .5. . .C' 0 � 14 • . . •1• l� • ��•111 ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Street; Zoning District. `. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ; and said parcel is affected by Section(s) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . of the Massachusetts State Building Code. Plans describing the work proposed, have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in accordance with Section IX A. 1 of the Zoning Ordinance. reCf c C w o _� >J C�� aUj rn T scv y 07 v N C) w� Vis:, O oa O Lr r (..C1 [� N Y• O rn W a Y r ac U cc 2E mr (n c s N �- The Application for Permit was denied by the Inspector of Buildings for the following reasons: The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero- gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for the following reasons: CK� / X e 7 Owner-Qo�.a:.�.a11cv. Car-{dg12 0 Address. . . CCcQ�77. . . (�� . .�)L! : . . . . . . . . . Telephonks ?). .PY.5 Petitioner A( IA)acL 50n 9� C 4F�J (a [�i ¢�bp Address`s. \ PC�,d�7 • •!?•/ �� .�!. .C . . . . . . . Date. Ay p?y� /q9I. . . Telephon S g�. .7.� 5. . . � 6 7 . . . . . . . . Three copies of the application must be filed with the Secretary of the Board of Appeals with a check, for advertising in the amount of. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . four weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals. Check payable to The Evening News. I NO....................... .................. PETITION TO BOARD 01 APPEALS r LOCATION ' v ................................................................ PEI I"II ON ER.....................a................... i ADDRESS..... _........'....................... ................................................ CONDITIONS ' ........................... ........................... ............................................................... / ............. ................................... r i PETITION APPROVED.................... ❑ DENIED......................... Smoke Detector/System Compliance File No . T Street CEDAR HILL ROAD Residential? (Y/N ) T Number of units : 1 Record » : 5948 Commercial? ( Y/N ) F Date : 05/24/91 Condominium? ( Y/N ) F Time : 12 : 25 : 18 Unit number: Seller: First name PAULA & FEDUARO Last WALL NOTE - For single-name entries , enter as ' LAST' only . Date of compliance 08/16/88 Company: H El = A E2 = B E4 = C DC G E5 = D L1 = E L2 = F FPB H Additional details : memo 1 "PgDn to enter , "End to end ) � 3 a no Smoke Detector/System Compliance File No . i Street CEDAR HILL ROAD Residential'. (Y/N ) T Number of units : 1 Record 6630 Commercial? ( Y/N ) F Date : 05/24/91 Condominium? ( Y/N ) F Time : 12 : 26 : 51 Unit number: Seller : First name EDWARD Last WALL NOTE - For single-name entries , enter as ' LAST ' only Date of compliance 04/25/89 Company: H E1 = A E2 = B E4 = C DC = G E5 = D L1 = E L2 = F FPB = H Additional details : memo ( "PgDn to enter, "End to end ) fa ffl ZD r' n� `co r_. y 1., w _ w c7 + \� ,. 3 qc. 87 89 /./ A6. 30, 740 \ j - 102 0 j 15,64 1.o Ac. � / o 2 0. o - ° _ -- ---__ ... O o 39 -- ZT (/ / e !7 . .. S,— 31 z3 100 30 \� ,° \ / -%N >� O so 70 too 45-s 45-s 72 C64002 s ,Oo 67 7766 7973 70 69 8262 1� 00 e 0 h 7 \ 0 13/40 C3 640 f 1 5 a {6k0 I 8540 `oo Opp o0 7 X00 11� o' Oq0 ee d 66 ,04 116 77 O � 12,782 � \� i °o Or 61 _➢ 210 6tPd0 �_ 4t e, DED `2 l8 ."s 20 &0, 1ss '8 AgDpEs 6,915 k„' C NG. 17,3r0 m w O 54 r m Q m ~� "t 7 K 10,726 0 ❑ /41 8 75 y \sj�JO p 55 xJ O ' E 2'7000 iso-s � a h 2s O h n o KELLEY 2a RD40 9 9 ro 3 g� 52� � E 050 3 1h, _1!111 _ � 7. � o tK a 22, 50 \\ 49 - i 0 0 2d,'JARI--r OF' ASSESSORS Cl FY HALL PAGE. 7, 7 �n, "H. 2 tktif'!Eb �ABUM ........... 4 SUBJECT PROPERTY: MA10. 2-.1 LOT. 0 1-.17 SUFF*. PROPERTY ADDRESS: 0005 CEDAR HILL. ROAD I A SRF"PF I-) Elf-INFR . I a A -71.. A'gf-�AGNO COEA, 7 f 10 �c 12 V 12 AP 'sL $ED to 0 jj�4 t5 � .l ()0 75 0C)04 CEDAR H.1 L L ROAD DALEY NICHOLAS J 4 CEDAR H.1 L.L ROAl. 0 12 MAUREEN A SALEM MA 01970 16 17 13 iN�ii iubd'44, `,W6.4k;�'RTOJI' KbAb" UT.NJ, LEONARD, F �'8 tbr kh'A IY", �X, ... to 14 -fER �Tf A 1, 19 ,,SA' - - , *qRESA-.L 5 21 :TFAN"R TI A J� . ......... ....IfLINTER,� 6 JEAN GLORIA D SALEM NA 01970 2 0 i 3 REBECCA SALEM MASS 01970 2'14 0 7 21 0116 0003 CEDAR HILL ROAD CROWELL PAUL H 3 CEDAR HILL ROAD 1, ,1, 1 "I"".11'� �,� 25 9 sHA rq Ro Cw t CL,q�I A V.7 26 �SAU.E 0 TIAIA-04,9,76,1 F7 0 Z1 1. fi�1� �abb�:i-Arl,i, oL)AI�JE.h 28 Z2 MANSUR BARBARA E SALEN NA 01970 29 23 Lo 0 0 -1 0120 0013 INTERVALE ROAD GAMSAL.E ANGELO 13 INTERVALE ROAD 31 24 GA111BALE DORIS SALEM MA 0-19*70 T2 L3 25 �.... . e, �...... 34 Z5 s 3 10 Z9 0 zon 41 31 t 32 43 0 4 33 �..... .. .... 34 035 36 37 ...... 0 50 38 52 2wv, 40 53 — 400 41 5 42 56 .......... 43 5 ........ ..... 44 4 9 0 45 2- 46 0 47 48 4 49 6 ....... 6 0 . ... ... .. . 7 A, 52 0 53 54 T2 PI R 73 EZFER s �CA ON 74 Z O J ^ ' V/ X c C13 U -T r • � I z� I � --- -- - All ' - ,_ _ I — z'I,�r_� I_ '� � � � :- :,� -,-�F ;- �.� __ ....----- -: L- .. ._ .__.__....___-_.___- I —� �f� " � J� � I ` —_ _. I`'rF�e F,G Ir f:. � =1 i -- - -. - ____.- ,..... . ___ I srr (.___-_.___—._. � - �-- _ B ' I -��.- - _._ 07fZ FF �l 1 . - L, ------------ vf UJ � � � � � �I � � I 1'- USC FXS I I G �I✓C'�� I ---- I—_ ItisuJ aTco Gv"' - _9:0' � X9.0, I II I I -- -- — J I D I a II aosE EF. I tc.E L.15E EX IST 1I.IG �- 5• PATIO POOP. A5 �a �.2-(0 xCo$ ` SHOWN li STEF_L DOJKS 2G'-.ISE EXI,TI�1G FIXEp INSULATED GLASS POJS1 2EA2 I LEI— I 5I PE ELEVA I I OQ ! O I REAc EL.E VA I O ISI I \ -e-- EXISTI�.IG j5T'ZuGTu�C ---- I _I I zlo 4' _ 5u C'IQC4 WINDOWS W FULL Sl..lL�sc�.I j �•� -. —_ __ ' ' - _..` - _—_ � ,ROOF COt� S I �'— I I � -- - -._ _ 1 ._ I cANT eleGc ✓ENT _ _ -- - �_.:_ --- 1� xb 2AF t . .__._1....-_-. _ _._. --__ ---- _ ..-... - .__ -_ L2' GDXA StHP ATHING -! /�• - - -- -- - - - --_=-----=— -- - - -- - - 5 - _ - fl - — _-- r -- o FxIsnNG ---I - �-- IkR I MATGN FXI TIIJGi Wi I I I FI!z ST F<_OO�? PSA t� �� - i xz 5 � uU - -- -_ t_ Il� _ _ - �I -- _ T I- �•, T 2_IM I' Fuad= Fr - / i � >zI �HT �IDF >=•LE✓ATiOf� _�_=I I _9 � 5HF_17 GZEr_�.IHouSr - 9ulNeobM 10 0 I 7-7 e•A F F WALL CONST. (— 1 .__-_ � I--..._—� � ----_.-:-I } .� .c}"TTW ON ;Y✓EIC ALL P2 GA MPI f_ AL /Z"CDSC ,�-5, 5HEA1 HIQJn 01J 2x41 ST�Ip W,ALt- ICo" o.C. � 3 4 -7 'n PLYWOOD SL�� (� .�� Z7 O --- --- - -- - - -- -- j-- - - -- - I T ECKI Ga -� I / SP.5EM EN I P L.A fel r �k --- - ------ I Z�c .O I(a O.C. METAL. I 2 2x12 NEAP^-F tt�ziDGING E -m+LP 5PAI,1 _ II J 3-2K8 HEA ON 5/8 CDX oN 2K10 cd r i P FT. I(n' O C W TH 17 'r ' r AGGE50'I--I r i �1 Z ,I 4o I- � p0 I II I 'I I I- A' COQ<G. SL/aP..� OLI �,. CONG.Z,_TE FO'�QPA 1 IO1.I I < � O 10'-O I ;'I GOMPAG _ty (jLAVEL V✓ALL —_— _ — ( fll O 7 q _ -t�—Exls�-IrJ� I i � � � � i; /7 v I / I 2 K(o STUP WALJ_ ' I I I _ I I ' - o 4' GONG. 51 .13 Onl Goti1G 5u-F� OKl U Cz) ® C � GONI�AGTEt7 GEAVG o F I OM GTG GL _ I / --Zxd P.L iILL 5',-L „ 2x , 27-0 -- --. , e FOUKJPATID�I SPECS- 4'- rAIrJ. O 8"�uC. Founlo. W!•�L.L - � L. a I� '..�I .'t Li 1 OF OF New FOUNVATIOW WALL TO f-)c (j): n . (o"W 12"p CCJ T. �' 8 GY I- N� �. coNG. s�A FOU f� DAllOf� PL�A�I �IJISH�c G�vD� d a SECTIOi�1 Gouc F�oTlti� - jF-CT l0l� 2 s TOP OF Wf* L T D P�f� 8� OFF SLAP a z V `/ a -- I o� 1 :D.c d,1�iA j:7, Ga (C-Ya �..Wi z _0 F- C)U -- -- /�� N co T - - - - -- �� —/ ------- \ - m i 00 � LLL — i �.-- --- ~ - - -- ---- — — - I i Z I ! I , - ..,._7--. 1 --:_- -----_ ---- - _ `YI - - -- ----------------------- CXiG:i Q4 Pi<cC- ! - �; ._. I i IIf LA-] I� � ' '� - I I I I I / ) 0 .__ ! .__ __ !— J -- _ L< --I I!'i - B,e.sE FF f•_� -�! -._..J _ E'��- FE j I Al L I _ 2F 115 E. EXIi� ILIG Z 2'(a'x Co' �" 5 PATIO POO P_ A5 ^.-_-_--------- STEEL DGl7ECS SHOWN �rusE =x15TIL1G FIXED 2FA2 I _EST 51DE ELE1//e Tl7 �l t O I�1 Lj5F-- _104` PANELS - --AS SHOvvN ADDITIOLI -_- _ I/4., , I '-O" I REAz EL F_VX1 ION I tea— EXISTtrJG �iTZULT�2E � i -- ---------- I z- - I Io -- III ' wiDu --- 5 O x4'-o' AL.ul�n. I I —i ROOF CUI l-BCrx 5 E: HINCa — i NAA, Fi7 • � ! �, �� or rwsrlti4 Wi �'Aca+A�T 5N1eJGu=� _--- - - � - - MATCH x15rI Na - --�� k Z I INA FIfzST FLOOR PL.A Q ��- liz Gw� o K - i 1X9 STk_a-.PPILIG 1/4 I i I FL ' . _ I 0 �'- U w j o=o P_EAr —I-- _ _ i Iy t � �Pjf FI GLA�E)OA.P-D �`— �2' Gw F. I/2 G:JP• -----_ __�'-' aJ_t_ -C �1;, �.aa . 1 /� I � � EPTItJG ON I �G''CDX ITIZI=AT� ��F�� •�L'.� � � _ —_— _.-----Co•� ----✓�,'� \ "-up WG.LL, Ic„" O.C. 5/4 T4Cn PLYWOOD — -- --- Z7•0" - I I A 5EM ENJ i` PLAN - -- -- - ------- ----- - -- - --- -- i _ 2x10 ICn� O.C . C MF'AL 'l�l 2.2x12NEaCF_� I �21DGING e -n-+ �p QaN w ! w �"-� E� �'•^nn°��ti�J�_ ' 3 2x8 HEAp3� L�� j I o�-I 5/2 GDx oN 210 ��:��:5. 10 o c P1 cHF-D 14- . I QzJZ I I Ii I j 4' colic. s' Ae� DLI p.. GONce -E FOJLIIZ4 T IOLI ! L L 0 lo' o ;III COMPacrcn GCAVEL - , wA�L -- -- _u -xl�`I 1G j 111 U tL 5 h_ GT LIw-! _ I ! G ot,4II F Ooo-n Q 4 ----^-1 " Lo OC (o-O� 1 = -- -- - - - - - - - -- - -- - -- - - - - — - - -' — J CONC. SLAfb 0LI _ CCM AGi F.-r> �aL=a/-L_ �21 G GOMPAL FD CaV'AVE�_ 2.4 Pry:SILL _,--..` �, - L CoG./.._. ; ----. ---_ -- - ---- ----- - 2xo pT ,LL — T - - I -- I FOut�IDATION SPECS. ,,° _ Y" 8•co.Jc. FOuLIu. oP OF W FOUNt7AT101J WALL ,O f'bi_ FIN I HF_D (,4r2ADE G • "� I J�r\ I o"V✓ x 12 D <1J - N FOU I� DATIDf`I PLAN EC ✓✓ v �6 (v`6 OFF NEW COLIC. SLtaP� ° I I SEC 101 GOL1G FL�T1�.1G -- • '• e T a I :TOP 0= WiG .O PSE g" OFF SLAPP, 1/4" = I=0 -� I