12 CARPENTER STREET - PRUITT, WENDY L - ZBA i
12 CARPENTER ST. R-2
Carpenter Realty Trust
— Wendy L. Pruitt Tr.
J
c�J'
J b� Cott of %$,ttlem, : as�ttt4usettq
? k 1
r
r
A g, n�rD of � ettl '83 001 -5 A110 '59
6ipullnR N�'` '
CITY CLER""i OFFICE
DECISION ON A PETITION OF WENDY PRUITT; TRUSTEE CARPENTER SAL=r': ''` °
REALTY TRUST FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT FOR 12 CARPENTER STREET
A hearing on this petition was held on September 21 , 7983 with the following
Board Members present: James Hacker, Chairman; Messrs. , Charnas, Hopper,
Luzinski, Piemonte and Associate Members Bencal and LaBrecque_ Notice of said
hearing was sent abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly .
published in the Salem Evening News in accordance Massachusetts General Laws
Chapter 40A.
Petitioner requests a Special Permit to allow her to convert an existing
0 . 1
two family- dwelling into a three family dwelling in this R-2 district.
The Special Permit. which has been requested may, under the
terms of the Salem Zoning Ordinance be granted upon a finding
by the Board of Appeals that the grant of the Special Permit
may be made without substantial detriment to the public good
and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent and purpose of this ordinance.
The Board of Appeal; after considering the evidence presented at the hearing,
makes the following findings of fact:
1 . Substantial opposition to petitioner's plan was raised by neighbors;
2. Carpenter Street is a small narrow street which already suffers
from traffic'congestion;
3. The street has a nursing home and a half-way house for retarded
adults on it;
4. Granting petitioner the relief requested would lead to increase in
congestion on the street and undermine the character of the neighborhood
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at
the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes that the requested Special Permit
cannot be granted without substantial detriment to the public good, and without
substantially derogating from the intent and purpose of this ordinance_
Therefore, the Board of Zoning Appeal voted unanimously to deny petitioners
request for A Special .Permit.
APPEAL FRY.1 THIS DECISIDW, :F ABIY, SHALL BE f^:ADE PURSUANT TO S`_CTION 17 OF THE MASS.
M-RA! 93. C9;`.Pi .. C:3. AND EHALL SE Fi'.EJ y4IT:iE F7 ZD DAYS AFTER THE DAT.£ GF 'H.1111; .
OF T-.Pe L . .� i ' -:f F Oc WE CIFY CL IaiX. -
u S
P 11, TIE VW a, Fc 0'O 'R:1IT
'� ...
CF _: r ii: cr 'I I 'iI A . CF ESC: I F L._HT
P _(. CF
F 1 '1 {P t i - EO.//// ��p_/�''^�../`-d-4•-r�u.
-
CP T%.'' u " I:' . F.IF I I D 'r ,,Sr9t��y,,g4arnas, Acting Secretary
RECORDED _ S E•.�i\ Fc..iSrRf D,'- eDn 00 I:'0EXED .i•19 ? he r - '
OF RECORD OR RZuV,K:; U ANJ NUIED ON THE OWNER'S CERTIFICATE OF TITLE -
BOARD OF APPEAL
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE
CITY CLERK