Loading...
9 CAMBRIDGE STREET - TOMSHO, MICHAEL & ANN - ZBA l '9 Cambridge St. R-2 Michael & Ann Tomsho s /G a S i (gity of -,Salem, fflussrzcltusetts 7taOMZ2T 0{ ,t1Upeal DECISION ON THE PETITION OF ANN AND MICHAEL TOMSHO FOR TYc c VARIANCES AT 9 CAMBRIDGE ST. (R-2) A hearing on this petition was held January 16, 1991 with the following Board Members present: Richard Bencal , Chairman; Joseph Correnti , Richard Febonio, Edward Luzinski and Mary Jane Stirgwolt. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioners , owners of the property, are requesting a Variance from zoning requirements in order to allow a two family dwelling in this R-2 zone. Before hearing the merits of the petition the Board first had to consider re- hearing the petition as it was denied on November 7, 1990. After hearing the merits, Mr. Luzinski made a motion, seconded by Mr. Febonio to hear the main petition. By a vote of 5-0 the Board allowed the petitioner to proceed with their petition to allow a two family. The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding by this Board that: a. special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings or structures in the same district; b. literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner; c. desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal , after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing, makes the following findings of fact: 1 . The main character of the building has never changed as to kitchen and bath facilities. 2. Property has been assessed as a two family since 1973. 3. Adequate legal parking can be provided on site as provided for under the City of Salem Zoning Ordinance. ;r DECISION ON THE PETITION OF ANN AND MICHAEL TOMSHO FOR A VARIANCE AT 9 CAMBRIDGE ST. . SALEM page two On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented, the Zoning Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1 . Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property but not the district in general . 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship to the petitioners. 3. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the Variance requested subject to the following conditions: 1 . Petitioner meet all requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety. 2. Petitioner meet any and all requirements of any other Board and/or Commission if necessary. VARIANCE GRANTED January 16, 1991 7yeiyc�da 'iEichard A. Bencal , Chairman A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Mass. General Laws, Chapter 808, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to Mass. General Laws, Chapter 808, Section 11, the Variairce cr 'racial Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the de;.ision, bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that,if such appeal has been cn = f::Cl, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Re;istry of Deeds and indexed under the name or the owner of record or C .- is recorded and noted on the.owner's Certificate of Titlo. N - BOARD OF APPEAO w � J Cwt ,F UJ Y S J r a u- r Cltu of �ZI[fm, 4RZj55UCjjUSPttS r� Bourb of u�tenl _ n JJ DECISION ON THE PETITION OF ANN AND MICHAEL TOMSHO FOR VARIANCES AT 9 CAMBRIDGE ST. (R-2) A hearing on this petition was held January 16, 1991 with the following Board Members present: Richard Bencal , Chairman; Joseph Correnti , Richard Febonio, Edward Luzinski and Mary Jane Stirgwolt. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioners, owners of the property, are requesting a Variance from zoning requirements in order to allow a two family dwelling in this R-2 zone. Before hearing the merits of the petition the Board first had to consider re- hearing the petition as it was denied on November 7, 1990. After hearing the merits, Mr. Luzinski made a motion, seconded by Mr. Febonio to hear the main petition. By a vote of 5-0 the Board allowed the petitioner to proceed with their petition to allow a two family. The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding by this Board that: a. special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings or structures in the same district; b. literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner; c. desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal , after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing, makes the following findings of fact: 1 . The main character of the building has never changed as to kitchen and bath facilities. 2. Property has been assessed as a two family since 1973. 3. Adequate legal parking can be provided on site as provided for under the City of Salem Zoning Ordinance. r- i I DECISION ON THE PETITION OF ANN AND MICHAEL TOMSHO FOR A VARIANCE AT 9 CAMBRIDGE ST. , SALEM page two On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented, the Zoning Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1 . Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property but not the district in general . 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship to the petitioners. 3. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the Variance requested subject to the following conditions: 1 . Petitioner meet all requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety. 2. Petitioner meet any and all requirements of any other Board and/or Commission if necessary. VARIANCE GRANTED January 16, 1991 A � Ol Tlnisl Ltz Chairman i�l�a11 J ichar A. ental , A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 Of the Miss. General Laws, Chapter 808, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Plimuont to Mass. General Laws, Chapter 808, Section il, the Varialrce cr °je^ial Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision, bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that,if such appeal has been O� f lvd, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name or the owner of "record or .- is recorded and noted on the owner's certificate of Title. N c;) BOARD OF APPEAD ('n � w r a � r August 1, 1990 To whom it may concern: This statement is meant to convey my knowledge of the resi- dence at 9 Cambridge St . , Salem, Mass . , during the years 1961 to approximately 1965 . In 1961 my uncle (Francis J. Carr ) and aunt (Katherine A. Carr ) bought the house at 9 Cambridge St . They moved into the house with their two daughters Phyllis and Mary and also my grandmother, Sarah E. Fouhey. In 1962 both my uncle, Francis, and my grandmother, Sarah died (within two months of each other ) . I recall being in the house at the time of my grandmother ' s funeral and that it was only family members who lived there at that time . In 1963 my cousin Phyllis Carr graduated from high school and in 1964 I attended a "going away" party for her as she was moving away from home (her sister had married and left home by then) . At the time of this party I recall that the house contained two families, the first floor being a separate apartment ( I do not re- member the tenants ' names ) . I assume that my aunt ' s decision to convert the first floor into an apartment was based on financial hardship - by that time she would have been a 54 year-old widow living alone in an eight-room house . After that I was not in the house for many years . Sincerely, /Ar 1 21F ouhe 19 Oliver Salem, MA �w. August 21, 1990 To whom it may concern: I have been informed that Michael and Ann Tomsho, owners of a home at 9 Cambridge St. , Salem, intend to rent the first floor of that residence as an apartment while they continue to be owner-occupants of the second and third floors. f I have no objection to this house' being used as a two-family residence. NAME ADDRESS 1 1 FILI�4_ )e4w J �i- ��U\IIITV. z\ I Salem Historical Commission ONE SALEM GREEN,SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 (617)745-9595, EXT.311 January 15, 1990 Richard Bencal, Chairman Board of Appeal One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 Dear Chairman Bencal : The Salem Historical Commission is in receipt of your meeting agenda for January 16, 1991 . In this regard, please be advised of the following: - That 22 Kosciusko Street is located within the Derby . Street Historic District as well as the Derby Waterfront National Register District; - That 9 Cambridge'Street is� located in the McIntire Historic-District as`well�as the Chestnut Street National Register District (please refer to the letter to the Board of Appeal dated 8/22/90) ; and - That, although it is not located in a local or National Register district, 23 Becket Street was likely built prior to 1800 . While historically inappropriate changes have already been made to the building (eg. picture window) , the Commission is hopeful that any additional work completed to the exterior of the building will be sympathetic to its age and Federal style architecture . Thank you for your consideration . Sincerely,, 94� THE SALEM HISTORICAL COMMISSION Annie C . Harris Chairman Jhiscom8/HIS119 ,Salem Historic.J commission ONE SALEM GREEN,SALEM. MASSACHUSETTS 01970 1617) 715-9595. EXT.311 August GL, 1990 Richard Bencal, Chairman Board of Appeal One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 RE: 9 Cambridge Street Dear Chairman Bencal: We are writing with regard to the petition of Ann Tomsho for a Special Permit to allow the premises at 9 Cambridge Street to be converted to a two family. Please be advised that this property is located in the McIntire Historic District as well as the Chestnut Street National Register District and directly abuts Hamilton Hall which is an individually listed National Register property. The Commission believes that, historically, 9 Cambridge Street was built as a single family home and we have found in the past that when single family homes are converted into multi-family, historic details are often removed or destroyed. While the Commission is not supportive of this petition, should the Board of Appeal grant the Special Permit, we would like offer a reminder that all work planned for the exterior of the building will require our approval prior to commencement. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Sincerely,THE SALEM HISTORICAL COMMISSION Annie ( . Harris Chairman M5WP