26 CABOT STREET - BOUCHARD, MAURICE & TINA - ZBA 26 Cabot St. R-2
Maurice & Tina Bouchard
1
r
%b fflitg of "Salem, �Mttssac4usetts
„ s
Paufb of &1P1P2d
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF MAURICE & TINA BOUCHARD
FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT FOR 26 CABOT ST. 7� pplll! tt����
A hearing on this petition was held October 9, 10&j Zath2ths fHISing Board
Members present: James Hacker, Chairman; Messrs. , Charnas, Gauthier, Strout and .
r Associate Member Bencal. Notice of the hearing W tent to abutters and others and
V
o notices of the hearing were properly published in t e Sale F� epj�§ News in
_ - � accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapt 4D�t:"
L C y F
E ' ` Petitioners, owners of the premises, request a Special Permit to allow them to use
t v := €' = ' the premises as a two family dwelling in this R-2 district.
LL
Z' C C � J �• J_ C _
r _ = the provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this request
Por 2 Special Permit is Section VI B 10, which provides as follows:
tz Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this
_ Ordinance, the Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the
procedure and conditions set forth in Section VIII F and IX D,
r grant Special Permits for alterations and reconstruction of
nonconforming structures, and for changes, enlargement, ex-
_ tension or expansion of nonconforming lots, land, structures,
and uses, provided, however, that such change, extension, en-
largement or expansion shall not be substantially more detri-
mental than the existing nonconforming use to the neighborhood.
_ - Lzrz
_ in more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit requests,
c `>: Muided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted upon a finding
by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will promote the public health,
_ d welfare of the City's inhabitants.
afety, .convenience an
she Board of Appeal, after hearing the evidence presented at the hearing, makes the
following findings of fact:
_ _ C
' ' 4 1 . The premises are suitable for use as a two family dwelling,
having two separate kitchens and baths;
2. The use of the premises as a two family will not have a
negative impact on the neighborhood.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and of the evidence presented at the
hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1 . The relief requested is not substantially detrimental to the public
good nor does it derogate from the intent or purpose of the Ordinance.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously 5-0 to grant the relief
requested, provided that 'a Certificate of Occupancy
�bee�obtained.
Scott E. Charnas, Secretary
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK
Lo-t 1°72 y
MbrzY P.
Wo eSEN CZ'0T=-C
G LF
38' ;,
u Zz�O t so b i d
72-
Lo VeLns
0 W000
ki
4 J
a U
38'
CBC T S-T E:T=
To, SvAS-T1Ee V4 St k-gj WC 53a•
I hereby eedifythat the existing d we i l in 5 PLAT PLAN OF LAND
►s located as shown,conformed to the Zoning
CLoiwrAucE of attineof in
construction and is not located in the S d L'E M
established Flood Hazard Zone. Scale, �••,zo• Date; o ►n ► S
(comm.Map No. ) T a M Engineering Associates inc.
r 'S � 22 Willow Ave. Salem , Mass.
TDWNSEND. !R. �•
No. 11225
'mss A�cisTcaE° �� APPUCANT: Sd�E
Note: ` °S�Is for mortgage 1B OWNER: t�gOAlc* E. t TIua govcueeQ
zoning purposes only and does not 1215"'2 104 p�qN REF
represent a complete survey. DEED REF,
S33