45 BUENA VISTA AVENUE - COUGHLIN, JOHN E - ZBA 45 Buena Vista Ave'. R-1
John E. Coughlin 1 __
�l
�l
V
v �
1
DATE OF HEARING 4511A/
PETITIONER 4
LOCATION / �tq
MOTION: TO GRANT / SECOND
TO DENY SECOND q
TO RE-HEAR SECOND
LEAVE TO WITHDRAW SECOND
TO CONTINUE SECOND
ROLL CALL PRESENT GRANT - DENY WITHDRAW RE-HEAR CONTINUE
`Of RICHARD BENCAL V /
JOSEPH CORRENTI_
RICHARD' FEBONIO
EDWARD LUMSKI
MARY JANE STIRGWOLT tZ
ASSOCIATE MEMBERS
ROI�A� /�ANE /)A''RR�HJ3R Rg4uE
CONDITIONS:
att-
T� Qlitg of Salem, ttssttcllusetts
Poarb of 'Appeal
September 9, 1991
Noticeeis hereby given that as of September 4, 1991 the
decision of the Board-of Appeal has been filed in the office
of the City Clerk to grant the petition of John Coughlin for
a Variance to allow construction of a deck at 45 Buena Vista
Ave.
BOARD OF APPEAL
Brenda M. Sumrall
Clerk of the Board
'Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of
the Mass. General Laws, Chapter So%and shall be filed within 20 days
after the d .te.of filing of this decision in
e office of ttion e Citythe ler ante
rk
Pursuant to Mr aes. General Laws, of the
or ,"ial Fe,mit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy
decision, bearae the certification of the
or thatCl suclerk h t 20 days
hashat
elapsed and no appeal has been filed,
recorded
filed,thatand indexed under the name en ismissed or denied I erthe'owner of record o[
Registry of Deeds
is recorded and noted �n the owner's Certificate of Title.
BOARD OF APPFAU. -
Tity of �tticm, {fass«Eli usefts
(. -Buttra of .Aupeal S=°
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF JOHN COUGHLIN FOR A VARIANCE
AT 45 BUENA VISTA AVE. (R-1 )
A hearing on this petition was held August 21 , 1991 with the following Board Members
present: Richard Bencal, Chairman; Joseph Correnti, Richard Febonio, Edward Luzinski
Mary Jane Stirgwolt. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and
notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accord-
ance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioner is requesting a Variance from rear setback to allow construction of
a deck in this R-1 district.
The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding of the
Board that:
1 . Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land,
building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other
lands, buildings and structures in the same district.
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve
substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner.
3. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public
good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the
district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the
hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact:
1 . The petitioner represented himself and expressed his need for the Variance.
2. There was no opposition by neighbors or abutters.
3. That the granting of the Variance would enhance the quality of life
for the petitioner.
4. The placement of the deck as proposed is the most feasible location
for the deck.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented, the
Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1 . Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property but
not the district in general.
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Ordinance would involve
substantial hardship to the petitioner.
.j�
DECISION ON THE PETTTlON OF JOHN COUGHLIN FOR A V;RIANCE
AT 45 BUENA VISTA AVE. , SALEM
page two
3. The relief requested can be granted without sI-SEPtantial Ldetriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogatinerom the intent
of the district or the purpose of the Ordinande ;
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal unanimously, 5-0, to grant the variance
requested, subject to the following conditions:
1 . The petitioner shall comply with all City and State statutes, ordinances,
codes and regulations.
2. That all construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted.
3. That a legal building permit be obtained by the petitioner. .
4. That all requirements of the City of Salem Fire Department relative to
smoke and fire safety are to be strictly adhered to.
Variance Granted
August 21 , 1991
Richard Febonio, Member, Board of Appeal
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Sectloll 17 62
tl+e tvla-c. General Laws, chapter 303, and shall be filed within 20 days
the c:.to of fi:InF, of this decision In the offoo of the City C:ark.
Pur: ^.•5. ., !ass. Ctneral Laws. Ch =.r A03, Sactial 11, the variance
or .�!ri-I O?;nit `ranted herein spoil not ta!:e e!fect uctil a ccny el tho
a,..:.[.. 'J t. o c:.rtlf:cation of the city C:crk that 20 days im`.
L•pz: :a.:', r.a cppeil has been t,led, or that, if sucn appeal Pias been
fl!eC, t!:-.t it i,,i; be^n disr.:i-seJ or dewed is rn:orded in the South Essax
Rc'-istry of Deetis anrd indexed under the name or the owner of record or
is recorded and noted as the o-wner's certificate of Titla.
BOARD OF APPEAL
f�itn of 'j� ryettlrm, �,7tiM85uCiilISPttB
.I1_ '.�•.J. r l'I
er Board of Appeal SH e2 N '91
C:Ty
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF JOHN COUGHLIN FOR A VARIANCE
AT 45 BUENA VISTA AVE. (R-1 )
A hearing on this petition was held August 21 , 1991 with the following Board Members
present: Richard Bencal, Chairman; Joseph Correnti, Richard Febonio, Edward Luzinski
Mary Jane Stirgwolt. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and
notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accord-
ance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioner is requesting a Variance from rear setback to allow construction of
a deck in this R-1 district.
The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding of the
Board that:
1 . Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land,
building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other
lands, buildings and structures in the same district.
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve
substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner.
3. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public
good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the
district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the
hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact:
1 . The petitioner represented himself and expressed his need for the Variance.
2. There was no opposition by neighbors or abutters.
3. That the granting of the Variance would enhance the quality of life
for the petitioner.
4. The placement of the deck as proposed is the most feasible location
for the deck.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented, the
Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1 . Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property but
not the district in general.
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Ordinance would involve
substantial hardship to the petitioner.
r/
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF JOHN COUGHLIN FOR A VARIANCE
AT 45 BUENA VISTA AVE. , SALEM
page two
3. The relief requested can be granted without sf?tatitia3 LdLetti:itrvrit to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogat nes rom the intent
of the district or the purpose of the OrdinanddlY S
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal unanimously, 5-0, to grant the variance
requested, subject to the following conditions:
1 . The petitioner shall comply with all City and State statutes, ordinances,
codes and regulations.
2. That all construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted.
3. That a legal building permit be obtained by the petitioner.
4. That all requirements of the City of Salem Fire Department relative to
smoke and fire safety are to be strictly adhered to.
Variance Granted
August 21 , 1991
Richard Febonio, Member, Board of Appeal
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK
Appeal from this decision, If any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 dt
t:•e A7aas. General Laws, Chapter 303, and shall be Had within 20 day9
..::cr tho c tc of filing of this decision in the office of tl:e City CG:rk.
Porm'•a '.o i.lass. General Laws, P03, Section 11, the varmnce
cr ,:r.;i.I F^reit grunted herein shod not ta!;e effect uctil a cc py of iho
bt;,ri,? t`e cLmf.cation of the City C!crk that 20 da vs ha.!
rlr p:c:� cnC r.a appeal has been tiled, or that. a sucn appeal ;'res been
f:cd, ±'::a it his baso di.;n:iscd or d^_nied is re:orded in the South Essax
R,^istry of Deeds and indexed under the name or the owner of record or
is recorded and noted 9.1 the o-wner's Certificate of Title.
BOARD OF APPEAL
Tity of ulrm, {7lZISSciCIIUSPttB
Butts of Au}tenl SEP 02 i`i X91
CIiP
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF JOHN COUGHLIN FOR A VARIANCE
AT 45 BUENA VISTA AVE. (R-1 )
A hearing on this petition was held August 21 , 1991 with the following Board Members
present: Richard Bencal, Chairman; Joseph Correnti, Richard Febonio, Edward Luzinski
Mary Jane Stirgwolt. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and
notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accord-
ance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioner is requesting a Variance from rear setback to allow construction of
a deck in this R-1 district.
The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding of the
Board that:
1 . Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land,
building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other
lands, buildings and structures in the same district.
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve
substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner.
3. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public
good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the
district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the
hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact:
1 . The petitioner represented himself and expressed his need for the Variance.
2. There was no opposition by neighbors or abutters.
3. That the granting of the Variance would enhance the quality of life
for the petitioner.
4. The placement of the deck as proposed is the most feasible location
for the deck.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented, the
Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1 . Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property but
not the district in general.
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Ordinance would involve
substantial hardship to the petitioner.
Cb.
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF JOHN COUGHLIN FOR A VARIANCE
AT 45 BUENA VISTA AVE. , SALEM
page two
3. The relief requested can be granted without stptantia3 &triment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogati'ne rom the intent
of the district or the purpose of the Ordinand�!7l :
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal unanimously, 5-0, to grant the variance
requested, subject to the following conditions:
1 . The petitioner shall comply with all City and State statutes, ordinances,
codes and regulations.
2. That all construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted.
3. That a legal building permit be obtained by the petitioner.
4. That all requirements of the City of Salem Fire Department relative to
smoke and fire safety are to be strictly adhered to.
Variance Granted
August 21 , 1991
Richard Febonio, Member, Board of Appeal
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK
Appeal from this decision, If any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 OL
the R1nas. General Laws, Chapter 803, and shall be filed within 20 day!
.,:::r the c:::tc of fiiinp, of this decision in the office of the City C:ark.
ur: to i,iss. Gsneral Laws, Ch.^.otel 808, S0ctiQ1 11, the varonce
cr .:•::i l Pwnit `ranted herein sNdl trot ta!:e effect until a ccov et the
",e c:.rlif!cziuon of the Ci:y Cleric that 20 days ha`:
appenl hoc been fled, or that. if such appeal P,ns been
f.!.-d, tltA it he+s br.en dlsnlisscd or denied is re-:orded in the South Essex
Rc,istry of Deeds and indexed under the name or the owner of record or
is recorded and noted as the owner's Certificate of TRW.
BOARD OF APPEAL,
(Cittl of tzlrm, { tlttssraLliuSetts
'Bourd of _Au
peAl SEP 02 1;i
C, Y ASS
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF JOHN COUGHLIN FOR A VARIANCE
AT 45 BUENA VISTA AVE. (R-1 )
A hearing on this petition was held August 21 , 1991 with the following Board Members
present: Richard Bencal, Chairman; Joseph Correnti, Richard Febonic, Edward Luzinski
Mary Jane Stirgwolt. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and
notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accord-
ance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioner is requesting a Variance from rear setback to allow construction of
a deck in this R-1 district.
The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding of the
Board that:
1 . Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land,
building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other
lands, buildings and structures in the same district.
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve
substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner.
3. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public
good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the
district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the
hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact:
1 . The petitioner represented himself and expressed his need for the Variance.
2. There was no opposition by neighbors or abutters.
3. That the granting of the Variance would enhance the quality of life
for the petitioner.
4. The placement of the deck as proposed is the most feasible location
for the deck.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented, the
Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1 . Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property but
not the district in general.
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Ordinance would involve
substantial hardship to the petitioner.
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF JOHN COUGHLIN FOR A VARIANCE
AT 45 BUENA VISTA AVE. , SALEM
page two
3. The relief requested can be granted without sLft?taritia Ldetrimrit to the
public good and without nullifying or substantiaily derogatingl�rom the intent
of the district or the purpose of the Ordinangdi :
CLQ;..• , ,..�
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal unanimously, 5-0, to grant the variance
requested, subject to the following conditions:
1 . The petitioner shall comply with all City and State statutes, ordinances,
codes and regulations.
2. That all construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted.
3. That a legal building permit be obtained by the petitioner.
4. That all requirements of the City of Salem Fire Department relative to
smoke and fire safety are to be strictly adhered to.
Variance Granted
August 21 , 1991
Richard Febonio, Member, Board of Appeal
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK
Appeal from this decision, If any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 OL
t:ie Moss. General Laws, Chapter 303. and shall be filed within 20 days
.,::cr he c;_:te of fiiinp, of this decision In the office of the City Cork.
i'or:p^ :o fa:;ss. General Laws, Ch.:Cter 803, Section 11, the Var.aace
er :!.:i'I ynr mit rranted herein sh Lii not ta!:e e!fect until a ccpy of the
1^ "e c:.rbftcnuon of the City C'erk that 20 days ha':
nn*, ca .:?peal has been tiled, or that. if such appeal has been
filed, tl.:t it hs:; been dis rt:hscd or denied is re.orded in the South Essex
R; ;istry of Deces and indexed under the name or the owner of record or
is recorded and noted to the owner's Certificate of Title.
BOARD OF APPEAL
APPEAL CASE NO. . . ...... .. .. .. .... . .. . .
(ILittt of �$ttlent, s husetts
�. Ammb ,zf
TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS:
ne Undersigned represent that he s are the owners of a certain parcel of land lobated
NO. . . 4 S . .l3u�^ y . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Street: District.
. -. J. -
KK. -a. .
and said parcel is affected by Sectiontsj . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
of the Massachusetts State Building Code.
Plans describing the work proposed, have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in
accordance with-�ectX A. 1 of the Zoning Ordinance.
The Application for ermit w s denied by the Inspector of Buildings for the following
reasons:
ti
� � m
� N r
O A N O
_ rn 2
The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of'Ike Safiem
Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildipg� tig m
approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of_sand v
Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unne('�ssaov.
hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially
gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code' for
the following reasons:
rK N
T >:
Ln
Ln t®
y
Owner. . . . . �.v.G`i �::: .. . . .. . . .. . .. . .
Address. 41-1- eh�. . Ivisld.,9�.. . . .. . .. . . ..
Telephone..... Z. . . . . . . . ...�. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
Petitioner.`4�.v. . . .E. . . fir/ ✓SLI '.. . :. . .
Address. . S. . . P���.�. . l/t /l. . . Av.. . . . . . . ..
Date. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Teleoh e...*�s. ��. . . . .
By. . . ...r . . . G ... ... .. . . . .
Three copies of the application must be filed with the Secretary of the Board of
Appeals with a check, for advertising in the amount of. . . . .. . . . . .... . . .. . . . ... ..
four weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals. Check payable to The
Evening News.
TARTER s TOWERS ENGINEERING CORP.
,'oseon 0.Carter 6 FAIRVIEW AVENUE
1rofessionaiEngineer SWAMPSCOTT, MASS. 01907
:?egisrered Land Surveyor Tel. 592-8386
PROPOSED PLOT PLAN OF LAND
SALEM, MASS.
_ OWNER: JOHN COUGHLIN
1 SCALE: 1 " = 20 '
\ DATE: JULY 8 , 1991
LOT � 9�o W
7
1o2. 5v'
i
� h
a
I P
1 M ^
a ,`I
Ex 6-7N4G
C:)00
1JG
�e v
i
AJC NOTE: Plan to accompany application
v 1 5.r.y,, to Salem Board of Appeals for
3vE. lA Special Permit.
�N OF
�—
OA I
4FCINS 7it
v'
:.
CIVIL ENGINEERING PERCOLATION TESTS SEArAGE DISPOSAL DESIGNS SURVEYING
/b�Z �
H a D IL;--f j20
/3743 160 _ H o ' 2 3
so
'F.2
° n164 163 n 710
00 82 1 0 5 204
ro 700 7398 -- %� N o 7. 27
165 6 179
1616,00 � \
7003 7C6 "167 . 205
V `/�`
s D �77
D 1!752 N
J P )
10800 N 2
13500
169 ' es
D zee z
°
13500 J
J
177 ,
128 127 >o ° /4 600
9/ 7503 126 s, 170 176
9500 125 B,J2 J, 12500 85 0 s '
/O 000
4 1244 171 '
f /0000 s� s� 13000 17$
>J 700
7000 s^
110 /0 0 172
Sz /oloo � e /azuo< 174 ,V o J 70 0
22 4
Iil 1 ° ° • h
112 121 0 9 e 3
o 87
C
83 C >o'o q >o �� • ' " 234 .
<' V 113 ^ .�
91 PJ° 600 /O 5 0
9907 ; 114 830
1 a• z o 500
500 120 / 119
.a L 0
B200 .i
1" +, 118
O 4° 251 q ///yyyt I6 .7 /_ 238
P /0700 >J2s >o\v/ / ' B4B of �c 9
Q'b ?y JA Q a 7QX36 -
250 >as s> D7 4 \0 0 70 239 O
O° J� 7 9 (Z) O
/0000
252 '0 4 V 33
12912 f, �240 24,
'0 7 03 627p
249 //�� 3.
253 18500 `/ / >° 3 Ce
7571
/2 9•r 6 IJP/ 3s s°
248 0 3,
I /7000 247
56 16200 246 245 '• Se sq
15 000 /1,600
5
2440
12 o
/z 4�0 / 'Cz
�� i D2ef
r^08-06-91A8:44:07.65954-LEGII
CITY OF SALEM I
BOARD OF APPEAL
745-9595 Ext. 381
Will hold a-public hearing for all persons inter- .�
ested in the petition submitted by John Coughlin
for Variance to allow a deck at 45 Buena Vista
Ave., listed by the City o1' Salem Assessor as 33
Buena Vista Ave. (R-1). Said hearing to be held
Wednesday,August 21,1991 at 7:00 P.M.,One Salem
Green, 2nd floor.
RICHARD A. BENCAL, Chairman _
August 7, 14, 1991
Y
08-06-91.08:44:07.65954-LEGH .
I
CITY OF SALEM rl
BOARD
OF 381 APPEAL
45 —
Will hold a public
hearing for all persons inter- .
,,ted in the petition submitted by John Coughlin - „
for Variance to allow a deck at 45 Buena Vista- i
Ave., listed by the City of Salem Assessor as 33
Bng to be held
uena Vista August(R 199 atd7 00 P.M,One Salem
Wednesday, ,
Green, 2nd floor. .
RICHARD'A. BENGAL, Chairman
August 7, 14, 1991 -�
8-06-91.08:44:07.05954-LEGH t6
`I
CITY OF SALEM
BOARD OF APPEAL
745-9595 Ext. 381
public hearing for all persons inter-
Will
nter-Will hold a p t[
for eVariance to'tallow a deckion at 45BuenaV VistaCty of I[[
Bues 33
naisti lstedtabAve.e(Rtl). Sasd hear nle sg to besessor aheld
W ednesday,August 211,1991 at 7:00 P.M.,One Salem j
t
Green, 2nd floor. - Chairman
RICHARD A. BENGAL, .
August 7, 14, 1991- -_ ,
APPEAL CASE NO. . . . . .. . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . . .
TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS:
rhe Undersigned reo esent that he is are the owners of a certain parcel of land lokated
UiS. k'. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Street; Zoning District. . . .). .
and said parcel is affected by Section(sj . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
of the Massachusetts State Building Code.
Plans describing the work proposed, have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in
accordance with pction IX A. 1 of the Zoning Ordinance.
The Applicationfor ermit w s denied by the Inspector of Buildings for the following
reasons:
C
r G
� N
r
The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of e) Satem n
Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildi ys1 tC
approve the application fee permit to build as filed. as the enforcement of:serd
Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unneassarg:,
hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero-
gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code* for
the following reasons:
MC, av
Rt 7 8`V
�I.n
r
-�7
Owner. . 0�� vGG !i:: .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Address. l .lSve_o. . . ?:r•% .1�k. . . . . . . . . . . .
Telephone. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Peti ti oner. Q� " . . . . E. . . r/ ✓�.(�.�
,i m. . . �v. . . . . . . . .
Address. v
. . . . . . . .
Date. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Telepho e.. . .35. ���. .
By. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Three copies of the application must be filed with the Secretary of the Board of
Appeals with a check, for advertising in the amount of. .. . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . .
four weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals. Check payable to The
Evening News.
_ rJ�
� n Z
n
Z
V
I
� n
j
e
n
C.•7 _
"" N
APPEAL CASE NO. . . . . .. . . . . .. . . .. . . . . . . .
y
f$�
TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS:
The Under9 ned reoresent that he is are the owners of a certain parcel of land located
Z
at NO. . . . . �• `�. . 1! .&. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Street; oning District. rl. .
and said parcel is affected by Section(s ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
of the Massachusetts State Building Code.
Plans describing the work proposed, have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in
accordance with Section IX A. 1 of the Zoning Ordinance.
0
The Application for Permit was denied by the Inspector of Buildings for the following
reasons:
.r GJ
The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms oQthe �lem
Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings rto v
approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said
Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unn c- saCy r
hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially ;d�rdo
gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Cod�erfor
the following reasons: 1
Z,
ul
Lo to
Owner. (. . . . .V, G��,r�. . . . . . . . . . . . .
Address. . . . . . . . . . . . .
Telephone.?!"� .. 9 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . �. . . .
Petitioner. .�bb�" .r% . . -Ca V-6 U': .. . . . . . . .
/r
Address. UQ' `�. . U r7!f . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Date 7! 21.1.f� . . . . . . . . . Teleone. . 7�fJ: 7S J/
By. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Three copies of the application must be filed with the Secretary of the Board of
Appeals with a check, for advertising in the amount of. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . .
four weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals. Check payable to The
Evening News.
v Z
¢_ z C;
8
t
TARTER & TOWERS ENGINEERING CORP.
Joseon D.Caner - 6 FAIRVIEW AVENUE
Professional Engineer
SWAMP
Registered Land Surveyor Tel. 59 MASS. 01907
Tel. 592-8366
PROPOSED PLOT PLAN OF LAND
SALEM, MASS .
OWNER: JOHN COUGHLIN
SCALE: 1 ., = 20 '
DATE: JULY 8 , 1991
j
i
h
23 P d
M
Ext s -7NC> n
n~
/
C:) f..-IG
c
50)
L-0 T 1 c?-7 z,.
X45
�0 rn
A y
i 1
,3
/. 7. 32 t
/� NOTE: Plan to accompany application
v t5T A'j 6. to Salem Board of Appeals for
3vE'4A Special Permit.
FA AOF �
JOSE
r �' �--
� CA
�FCi'�TtR
Vy�'Al UMOg�
CIVIL ENGINEERING PERCOLATION TESTS SEWAGE DISPOSAL DESIGNS SURVEYING
�BpZ
MAKEKACE 1315909
CARTER & TOWERS ENGINEERING CORP.
.7i�w��a., �auieecLwzd�%
Joseph D.Carter -
ProtessionaiEngineer _ 6FAIRVIEW AVENUE _
Registered Land Surveyor - SWAMPSCOTT. MASS. 01907
PROPOSED PLOT PLAN OF LAND Tel 592-8386
SALEM, MASS.
OWNER: JOHN COUGHLIN
SCALE: 1 " = 20 '
DATE: JULY 8, 1991
k
C7 01,
I
i
h
P M
Ca
n c av
5.3.
�.LO
�I� x F T In �
_X
} m99 n
n �c
v, Lo
J AN
' 6
32i
NOTE: Plan to accompany application
vi rr r J�' to Salem Board of Appeals for
A Special Permit.
JOSE
s i?
/
CA , P
/ SAL LAIAt- �
CIVIL ENGINEERING PERCOLATION TESTS SEWAGE DISPOSAL DESIGNS SURVEYING
YAKEPEACE 136089
CARTER At TOWERS ENGINEERING CORP.
Joseph D.Caner _
Professional Engineer _ 6 FAIRVIEW AVENUE _
Registered Land Surveyor. - SWAMPSCOTT. MASS. 01907
PROPOSED PLOT PLAN OF LAND Tel. 592-8386
SALEM, MASS.
OWNER: JOHN COUGHLIN
SCALE: 1 " = 20 '
DATE: JULY 8 , 1991
q
Z.SOP
LOT � /raa
I
h
P M
y p2e1?
Q...JrZ`rr-J6
co
2
iP LoT 177
n w q9
r un
4
E
79. 32
NOTE: Plan to accompany application
to Salem Board of Appeals for
Special Permit.
OF
�y
.Loss �, y
o CA-
9£Gl$TEF
CIVIL ENGINEERING PERCOLATION TESTS SEWAGE DISPOSAL DESIGNS SURVEYING
/$v21
MAKEMACE 135989
U H a n T F„ e° 160 1203
d. 77 16I /3 743 \I80 N a o L7�27
1 164 163 ❑ /! 710 — -
5
7000810 ` 204
c 7398
7327
165 179
W
s
7003 706E 167 /6,000 205
a 11752
z 317
O 168 °oCi
0. /oaoo 178 2'
29
3800 a es 3 /3 500 7��
Ye zs , ?�
>> S e0 q ? O 169 0
07.
1 9 00 13500 a s
e iT7
128 127 �° °91 14 600
7603 126 3 a, 170 ,.
9500 f255 s���' /2500 8570 'u o
/0000
124
/0000 •�i sO / 171 175 e
7000 ,�� 3000 70 0
I10 123 172 "
92 /0/00 @ 3 /22u0 174 0
70 0 a
� 0GF2,D'0 1411 122 ° �J^° ' �
° so 173
112 121 ' °� 87�'���/
�
,° 2. 9 83 C 9o4 o V 23
,° 113 )° p
91 e, 600 114 80'9907 °� 830 °o "�+500 120 119
/`-
)0 ° 08 se
� 8
e L7 115 < � i.
s s o goof P .2
,° c O 4 251 q�' 116 Y 118 s
v /q8 P
�e 2 0 �iege 7`V o � 238
Q /0700 �s ` 70 9 _
`t 250
AO P ? 9/000 7 OOo 3
�g9v252 '0j' 4 33
�
C. 7 o j40 2y1
/moo 62)0
253 8500
,0'` s3 O 7,2-742
3e e°
248 O 3,
74p2 -�
17000 247
56 /6200 246 245
� 0 /5000 //,600 i{FR f
24
° m f
m
c \
�o
/2 a!'0 ice `
� ��
,,
- J
BOARD OF ASSESSORS PAGE.
Y
C.11 HALL
E� * I -, I ,.1 , 9 1�0;9-F9
6,1,7
2
'U
ERTIFIED,A2,
C TIERS, 4
3
4 5-
SUBJECT PROPERTY: PIA 1-1 09 LOT: 0117 SUFI: �-, 5
A VISTA 7
PROPERTY ADDRESS: 0033 BUEN AVENUE T
0 4NE-R— 9
7
10
0
9 12
I-QT- -qg FFF ADDRESS --Ff;6Fl)-lObjNFk .. ..... NAll -ING DRESC-z
10
14
11 75 0
0 09 0115 0(329 BUENA VISTA AVENUE SIXTEEN HEATH ROAD REAL T*Y TRUE;r 29 BUENA VI S T'A AVE
12 1 TPHAN Gul DTF I.fi� �--,Al FM IA rij 9--n 16
I ", , I I"§,,,x I,-, ,, I 1 :1,11-,I , 3,
13 ' '1' . , 11 "'l—' ', , , ", ",", o3.
o 3-1 BulfNA, V I s T'A A � 1611M, -,, o� , ll� ,�S�,-�,,,, I -
AVENUE RZ, EDWARD
14 9 0
0 19 0
77
fqA� ol
-ITAC� 2D
15 PnOR WRTAS-F S TR C'E'T KQ4WE-0V' ROBERT
11 IP9 lk 3 E - 21
16 BARBARA SALEM PIA 0-19-70 22
0 17 0
09 0119 0042 SABLE ROAD GINSBERG MELVIN 4'.2 SABLE RD T3
T4
is G
25
26
19
09 L71 1,-,10 0640,, SABLE, ROAD
§Ab4j4ik4Nt
40 SABLE RD
0 20
27 0
SALEM MA 01970
21 WT
& 29
22 ANN S SALEM PIA 0.1970
0 23 AVE 0
— 09 0246 0034 BUENA VISTA AVENUE DEVOE LEONARD N 34 BUENA VISTA
24 SALE 3�
25 1032�BOENA� Vl TA A ",ASkEW;,PHIL.�IP 34
-4 9 VEAUE
26 Ts
36
L T
27 v ml I' AM
6r Ig -pAr�,pi toy
L;
14 — 37
28 ESTHER N SALEN PIA 0-1970 38
0 - 0
29
Tc 40
31
32
44
0
33
45
34 46
0 35 T7 0
36
...... 49
37 50
38 51
0
39 52
5�
40 4
0 41 50
42 56
43
o
44 9 0
45
6 1
46
— L2 0
47 63
0 —
48 64
65
49
66
'o
51 68
6s
52
o
53 T,
0 — T,i
54
CARC."N
7
0 El ASSESSOR 7
S-0
i�� a - —
eel
cy-
Pi
5' 0�