Loading...
5 BRISTOL STREET - HOUGHTON, JERROLD & ANN - ZBA 5 Bristol St.- R-1 Jerrold & Ann. Houghton DATE OF HEARING /// PETITIONERS LOCATION T� MOTION: TO GRANT SECOND (( U N !I TO DENY SECOND TO RE-HEAR SECOND LEAVE TO WITHDRAW SECOND TO CONTINUE SECOND ROLL CALL PRESENT GRANT DENY WITHDRAW RE-HEAR CONTINUE -�I RICHARD BENCAL JOSEPH CORRENTI RICHAW FEBONIO ✓ EDWARD LU MSKI ' MARY JANE STIRGWOLT ASSOCIATE MEMBERS J%ARR�LAB ADY QUE CONDITIONS: C30 Z'` i \ 11' 49 Air' '91 flZittz ofttlrm, � usstztliuseti��r ;s -Boura of .Av '„ j� - }tettl DECISION ON THE PETITION OF JERROLD & ANN HOUGHTON FOR VARIANCES AT 5 BRISTOL ST. (R-1 ) A hearing on this petition was held May 15, 1991 with the following Board Members present: Richard Bencal, Chairman; Edward Luzinski, Vice Chairman; Joseph Correnti, Secretary; Richard Febonio and Mary Jane Stirgwolt. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioners, owners of the property, are requesting Variances from side and rear setbacks to allow an existing deck in this R-1 district. The Variances which have been requested may be granted upon a finding by this Board that: a. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other land, building or structures in the same district. b. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, c. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1 . The deck in question has been in existance since 1986. 2. The size of the lot creates a hardship as this is the only practical location for the deck. 3. The deck in question allows the inhabitants a fuller use of their property and will not be detrimental to the neighborhood. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1 . Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property but not the district in general. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship to the petitioners. 3. Desirable relief can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. DECISION ON THE PETITION OF JERROLD & ANN HOUGHTON FOR VARIANCES AT 5 BRISTOL STREET, SALEM page two Hf91' L� II 49 �tI f9I Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-01 to grant the Variances requested, subject to the following conditions: CiTY G;" . : ; - 1, f.';SS 1 . All construction be done as per existing city and state building codes. 2. All constructions be done as per plans and dimensions submitted. 3. Exterior finishes to be in harmony with present structure. 4. Petitioner obtain a legal building. 5. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety be strictly adhered to. Variances Granted May 15, 1991 rte) Richard A. Bencal, Chairman, Board of Appeal A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Mass. General Laws, Chapter 808, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to Mass. General Laws. Ch;iter 808, Section 11, the variance or �ecial Permit granted herein sba;l not take effect until a copy of the decision, ter:rinn, thea certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismisse4l or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name er the owner of record or Is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. BOARD OF AF-PEAU f Q{ �ttlem, ttssttcl c 1 � use##s - F aurb of (Appeal May 21 , 1991 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT AS OF THIS DATE THE DECISION OF THE BOARD OF APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK TO GRANT THE PETITION OF JERROLD AND ANN HOUGHTON FOR A VARIANCE TO ALLOW AN EXISTING DECK AT 5 BRISTOL ST. BOARD OF APPEAL Brenda M. Sumrall Clerk of the Board Appeal from this decision, if any.shall be made pursuant to section 17 of: the NAass.General Laws, Chapter 808, and shall be filed within 20 days the date.of filing of this decision in the office ti 11,th Clerk. ante after Section n'o : Laws, Chapter 808, of the . P.e, it a COPY r ni if) ¢gas. effect unS. P u.sua _ t take P - he,e•n hall no a o ..l ;=rmi'.gren�n rk that 20 days have or �_ci... _ he Cit Cle decision, leering tho c:r'.ific�'.ior,of Y if such appeal has been elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, , he South .flied,that it has been dismissed or denied is recordedorthe owner of recordeor Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name the owner' Ills recorded and noted On BOI Title.cate of ARDOF APPEAL' ' r 4 P}ar tl li 49 1 '91 y (Gitty o � f ttlrm, � ttSsttCl�uSPti T}" °Aa ; .� .� �, ti`_^ nura of r�upL DECISION ON THE PETITION OF JERROLD & ANN HOUGHTON FOR VARIANCES AT 5 BRISTOL ST. (R-1 ) A hearing on this petition was held May 15, 1991 with the following Board Members present: Richard Bencal, Chairman; Edward Luzinski, Vice Chairman; Joseph Correnti, Secretary; Richard Febonio and Mary Jane Stirgwolt. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem EveningNews in accordance with Massachusetts c setts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioners, owners of the property, are requesting Variances from side and rear setbacks to allow an existing deck in this R-1 district. The Variances which have been requested may be granted upon a finding by this Board that: a. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other land, building or structures in the same district. b. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, c. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1 . The deck in question has been in existance since 1986. 2. The size of the lot creates a hardship as this is the only practical location for the deck. 3. The deck in question allows the inhabitants a fuller use of their ro ert and will not be detrimental I ental to the neighborhood. property Y g On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1 . Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property but not the district in general. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship to the petitioners. 3. Desirable relief can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. rf DECISION ON THE PETITION OF JERROLD & ANN HOUGHTON FOR VARIANCES AT 5 BRISTOL STREET, SALEM page two MAY L� 49 4,1 t91 Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the Variances requested, subject to the following conditions: CITY ;; - (�(.Lfu. .. .,. _SS 1 . All construction be done as per existing city and state building codes. 2. All constructions be done as per plans and dimensions submitted. 3. Exterior finishes to be in harmony with present structure. 4. Petitioner obtain a legal building. 5. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety be strictly adhered to. Variances Granted May 15, 1991 Richard A. Bencal, Chairman, Board of Appeal A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Mass. General Laws, Chapter 808, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuont !o Mass. Genera! Lavis, Cn;,Iter 808, Section 11, the variance or ?pecoi Permit granted he;ein shat out take effect until a copy of the decision. Gr:rinq th-, certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elaps-ri and no appeal has been tiled, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismisscj or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name or the owner of record or Is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. BOARD OF APPEAL! Mar rl II 49 ij,j '91 (Cittl of "&tt1rm, 44JJa55ttC11U5etfdT1 ;S '�;- ?f IOZITD Of �ttpral DECISION ON THE PETITION OF JERROLD & ANN HOUGHTON FOR VARIANCES AT 5 BRISTOL ST. (R-1 ) A hearing on this petition was held May 15, 1991 with the following Board Members present: Richard Bencal, Chairman; Edward Luzinski, Vice Chairman; Joseph Correnti, Secretary; Richard Febonio and Mary Jane Stirgwolt. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly. published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioners, owners of the property, are requesting Variances from side and rear setbacks to allow an existing deck in this R-1 district. The Variances which have been requested may be granted upon a finding by this Board that: a. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other land, building or structures in the same district. b. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, c. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1 . The deck in question has been in existance since 1986. 2. The size of the lot creates a hardship as this is the only practical location for the deck. 3. The deck in question allows the inhabitants a fuller use of their property and will not be detrimental to the neighborhood. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1 . Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property but not the district in general. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship to the petitioners. 3. Desirable relief can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. I. DECISION ON THE PETITION OF JERROLD & ANN HOUGHTON FOR VARIANCES AT 5 BRISTOL STREET, SALEM page two II 49 44 '09i Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the MGY LI Variances requested, subject to the following conditions: CITYSS % - Cit„, 1 . All construction be done as per existing city and state building codes. 2. All constructions be done as per plans and dimensions submitted. 3. Exterior finishes to be in harmony with present structure. 4. Petitioner obtain a legal building. 5. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety be strictly adhered to. Variances Granted May 15, 1991 Richard A. Bencal, Chairman, Board of Appeal A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Mass. General Laws, Chapter 808, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to Mass. Cenam? Laws, Cn;!*ter 808, Section 11, the variance or?pecial Pa.mit granted he;ein sha3 rut take effect until a copy of the decision, ba:rinq the certification of the City Cterk that 20 days have elapsed ani no appeal has been til:d, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissca or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name or the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. BOARD OF APPEAII P?Wr �I li 49 uii '91 (iittU ofS ttlrm, � ztsstt[l usettTr (a) C Bnttra of - , peal DECISION ON THE PETITION OF JERROLD & ANN HOUGHTON FOR VARIANCES AT 5 BRISTOL ST. (R-1 ) A hearing on this petition was held May 15, 1991 with the following Board Members present: Richard Bencal, Chairman; Edward Luzinski, Vice Chairman; Joseph Correnti, Secretary; Richard Febonio and Mary Jane Stirgwolt. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were prcperly.published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioners, owners of the property, are requesting Variances from side and rear setbacks to allow an existing deck in this R-1 district. The Variances which have been requested may be granted upon a finding by this Board that: a. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other land, building or structures in the same district. b. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, c. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1 . The deck in question has been in existance since 1986. 2. The size of the lot creates a hardship as this is the only practical location for the deck. 3. The deck in question allows the inhabitants a fuller use of their property and will not be detrimental to the neighborhood. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1 . Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property but not the district in general_ 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship to the petitioners. 3. Desirable relief can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. 1 DECISION ON THE PETITION OF JERROLD & ANN HOUGHTON FOR VARIANCES AT 5 BRISTOL STREET, SALEM page two k� ,l i Therefore the ZoningBoard of A G_ 'Itr g t the �j'I r91 Appeal voted unanimously, 0, to grant the Variances requested, subject to the following conditions: CITY ' ' - I;L ' '.SS r.,. 1 . All construction be done as per existing city and state building codes. 2. All constructions be done as per plans and dimensions submitted. 3. Exterior finishes to be in harmony with present structure. 4. Petitioner obtain a legal building. 5. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety be strictly adhered to. Variances Granted May 15, 1991 Richard A. Bencal, Chairman, Board of Appeal A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Mass. General Laws, Chapter 808, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant !o Mass. Genera! Laris. Cn:•nter 808, Section 11, the Variance or ?pecol Permit granted herein shoal nut take effect until a copy of the decision, to_nn, the certification of file City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed ani no appeal has been til;d, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismisses: or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name er the owner of record or Is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. BOARD OF APPEAL :w U tiWr LI li 49 ur '91 of -'�aJVM, � �ssttdiusPti �r ss ., , . ?, -Sourb of Appeal �ro DECISION ON THE PETITION OF JERROLD & ANN HOUGHTON FOR VARIANCES AT 5 BRISTOL ST. (R-1 ) A hearing on this petition was held May 15, 1991 with the following Board Members present: Richard Bencal, Chairman; Edward Luzinski, Vice Chairman; Joseph Correnti, Secretary; Richard Febonio and Mary Jane Stirgwolt. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly.published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioners, owners of the property, are requesting Variances from side and rear setbacks to allow an existing deck in this R-1 district. The Variances which have been requested may be granted upon a finding by this Board that: a. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other land, building or structures in the same district. b. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, c. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1 . The deck in question has been in existance since 1986. 2. The size of the lot creates a hardship as this is the only practical location for the deck. 3. The deck in question allows the inhabitants a fuller use of their property and will not be detrimental to the neighborhood. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1 . Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property but not the district in general. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship to the petitioners. 3. Desirable relief can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. t DECISION ON THE PETITION OF JERROLD & ANN HOUGHTON FOR VARIANCES AT 5 BRISTOL STREET, SALEM page two it, 49 4t '0 Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the 1I Variances requested, subject to the following conditions: C1TY 1 . All construction be done as per existing city and state building codes. 2. All constructions be done as per plans and dimensions submitted. 3. Exterior finishes to be in harmony with present structure. 4. Petitioner obtain a legal building. 5. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety be strictly adhered to. Variances Granted May 15, 1991 Richard A. Bencal, Chairman, Board of Appeal A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Mass. General Laws, Chapter 808, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City clerk. Pursuant !o Mass. General Laws, Cn>ater 808, Section 11, the Variance or ?pecmi Farmit granOd he;ein shag nut take effect until a copy of the decision, Ga::rinq th-: certification of tlx: City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no ap)eal has been filzd, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismiss" or denied is recorded In the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name or the owner of record or Is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. BOARD OF APPEAD 24-'0_9 4-3 0-91.0' 6:46:3 6.58834-LEGE CITY OF SALEM BOARD OF APPEAL 745-9595 Ext. 381 Will hold a public hearing for all persons inter- ested in the petition submitted by Jerold and Ann Houghton for a Variance and/or Special Permit to allow existing deck at 5 Bristol St. (R-1). Said hearing to be held Wednesday, May 15, 1991 at 7:00 P. One Salem Green, 2nd Floor. RICHARD A. BENCAL, Chairman May 1, 8, 1991 - CITY OF SALEM BOARD OF APPEAL p4­ One Salem Green MAY- SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 C3 HAY Ac =-0245-*+ BLATTBERG GARY Pomowopl� 6 B HA 01970 i � #. � n r t � � c. � � 6 � � . '. CITY OF SALEM ` BOARD OF APPEAL 745-9595 Ext. 381 Will hold a public hearing for all persons inter- ested in the petition submitted by Jerold and Ann Houghton for a Variance and/or Special Permit to allow existing deck at 5 Bristol St. (11-1). Said hearing to be held Wednesday, May 15, 1991 at 7:00 P.M., One Salem Green, 2nd floor. RICHARD A. BENCAL, Chairman MaY 1, 8, 1991 N CITY OF SALEM BOARD OF APPEAL 745-9595 Ext. 381 Will hold a public hearing for all persons inter- ested in the petition submitted by Jerold and Ann Houghton for a Variance and/or Special Permit to allow existing deck at 5 Bristol St. (R-1). Said hearing to be held Wednesday, May 15, 1991 at 7:00 P.M., One Salem Green, 2nd Door. RICHARD A. BENCAL, Chairman May 1, 8, 1991 CITY OF SALEM BOABH OF APPEAL 745-9595 Ext. 381 Will hold a public hearing for all persons inter- ested in the petition submitted by Jerold and Ann i Houghton for a Variance andlor Special Permit to allow existing deck at 5 Bristol Sy 15, 1991 Said hearing to be held Wednesday, 7Znd floor- .00 P.M., One Salem D,A. BENCAL, Chairman RICHARD: May 1, 8, 1991 r r CITY OF SALEM BOARD OF APPEAL 745-9595 Ext. 381 Will hold a public hearing for all persons inter- ested in the petition submitted by Jerold and Ann Houghton for a Variance and/or Special Permit to allow existing deck at 5 Bristol St. (R-1). Said hearing to be held Wednesday, May 15, 1991 at 7:00 P.M., One Salem Green, 2nd floor. RICHARD A. BENCAL, Chairman May 1, 8, 1991 . -- i APPEAL CASE NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . �,..' OARD Or APPEALS Ctv of "ittlem, 'fflttssar4usEtts 21 W °91 �Bourb of Aypeal c 1VED TO THE BOARDC17`� � �`kL4:htA55. nF0R The Undersined r present that he is are the owners of a certain parcel of land located at NO._.'ise_A /�5/9/-. . s�X. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Street; Zoning District. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ; and said parcel is affected by Section(s ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . of the Massachusetts State Building Code. Plans describing the work proposed, have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in accordance with Section IX A. 1 of the Zoning Ordinance. ,V�5a� > r_ � M Mm 0 n `; The Application for Permit was denied by the Inspector of Buildings for :Uhe fgllowing reasons: r The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero- gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for the following reasons: Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings and structures in the same district. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordianance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner. Owner. Addr ss. /1/y7D i Telephon `. • • • • • • • • • • • • Peti ti one Add ress.tJ. . . .K �/97� Date- if . y ./ ( ///// C ! � . Telephon � ��� 1.'I �P .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Three copies of the application must be filed with the Secretary of the Board of Appeals with a check, for advertising in the amount of. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . four weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals. Check payable to The Evening News. Z z m C O J > C m z ,c o c m > APPEAL CASE NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . pAicD Dr AP?FACS 1�; a dtt-Cilf '�iMlenl' (7 asSMLiTusett$ �Rn arzr3 of nrzl J� :111 n �Om1G p ..r�O 1\r 1 TO THE BOARDD,,V flt 9;lliSS. OIQ The Undersigned represent that he is are the owners of a certain parcel of land. located .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Street; Zonina District. . . . . . and said parcel is affected by Section(s ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . of the Massachusetts State Building Code. Plans describing the work proposed, have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in accordance with Section IX A. 1 of the Zoning Ordinance. N G The Application for Permit was denied by the Inspector of Buildings for �he following reasons: / "' e av(-a � The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary . hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero- gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for the following reasons: Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings and structures in the same district. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordianance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner. Owneri��4LG1 �?duf �`�D?/L1d ;'yy Address. i Telephones. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Petitione Address! la Date: /� �% Un .�. ..<.. . . Telephone J� X` �Q . . . . . . s?��4OIL . . . . . . . . . . . . . Three copies of the application must be filed with the Secretary of the Board of Appeals with a check, for advertising in the amount of. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . four weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals. Check payable to The Evening News. PLAN OF LAND SALEM, Ass. _SLS REID L4NO 365 CHATHAM ST.'.` r� P` Edi 0, SI Lt;-1.t:dSS. RALPH WILLIAM y REiU m K&25422 I� tifi S L;Jo S Ct►t.Cy =Air. t'46* 'be area , 7J Shawn ��� 3s.aS - .yo.6 1Col3 z E 3 �`cK 3,7,2.2 : S. � ce )..41 N� AaJo a/e9%s m 'r � .Tohnse� y � I O • •'' 39.a B�pJan) s AS /R /,5 ro .c, ,q "I. lEAESY. CEA77FY 71771E BEST OF NY KNOhZED6E NOTE THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED FROM A 77m r 77E PRENISFS SHOMN ON MIS PLAN AHE NOT TAPE SUf7YEY AND IS INTENDED FOR LOCA70 Wr77fIN AFL DOD HAZARD AREA AS DELINEATED MORTGAGE PURPOSES ONLY. OFFSFTS SHOWN ON 77E NAP OF CawthVITY 1250 1 02-8 PREPARED BY 77F ON OR SCALED FROM THIS PLAN, ARE FE09W E076SWY NANAA6ENCY 09 IT'S APPROXIMATF ONLY AND SHOULD NOT BE SUCCE MS DATM 8/5/85. " USED TO D57FRMINE PROPERTY LINES. I FUR77EA CEA7TFY 77mr THIS INSPECTION MAS PER- FOfAIg 7 IN ACCOM4NCE WrM 77E •TECHNICAL SrAND- SCALES"_ 2 0' DATE Ma.c/1 /� AIMS FDR A009MASE LOAN INSPECTIONS' AS ADOPTED BY i 77F MASSAOLS 3' ASSOCIATION OF LAND MR7YEYORS AAV UM SWrNEERS. BOOK 64' 89 PAGE lead,7 CERT, a 7NIS CERTIFICATION DOES NOr INCLUDE SHRUBS WALLS 7z ?3 is'/ FENCES OR DRI*VAYS AS 77EY 00 NOT ALWAYS MICA X CONTROL # 09/- d 7 a 2 A., PROPERTY LINES AMR47a).. M L CITY OF SALENJ , �,.,IASSACIHUSLETIS ASSESSORS MAPS 1 22ti 0 p Ts ?t1 ° o V6a32 a '. 1 3 50 j1 009 N -A �r� 0 -0 4' 1 J gaol 239 0 °w 4 a8 3'9 J3 1 w 9 1023 OG G 3 16 `Z 9 0 ^ \.. ✓ J o °3852 2�� 39gA \� S \\30 a :� w r X30 m �.3 1773 1 �a0' Ul 1 P g00 r 70 x1 2 rn 1 rLgv° �ne 5 a5 0 2g\ 5a58 'I 23 00 as 5 64 o e° e0 0` P J 2� vol 6°t e.. °`\5 00 2$(k\��4 a,'2 0 �` �ES \ a $ Z 5 9655 oo �Zo 6 o a�j5 \ 5° 5636 915 6 32 $96' 632 'Al qJt r Zea aJ.j° 8o ,.OI g o 2� 5 3 O 57 26/ \ Jc s,• _� 5902 3308 '322a SALEM 13' O 6 S 8EL !_EAU STATE ^ 5O G COLLEGE ;, °w 6 35-5 o5Q UI�3jv 611 0 � 'gyp 6,d� 12,636 921 g ° 1 I60 ❑ ,522 P�16 50 im UCWMNEY \\ ' o a QO t 4170 U APPEAL CASE NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Pa �• �,i �` � �� � �uar� of �}r}�ettl . .... .4 L.:v y. TO �HE.EBOARD OF APPEALS: The Unders gned /represent/ that he is are the owners of a certain parcel of land located at N0.5 /.STQ . •sT• . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Street; Zoning District. . . . . . . . . . . • • . • • . _ . • • . . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . : and said parcel is affected by Section(s ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . of the Massachusetts State Building Code. Plans describing the work proposed, have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in accordance with Section IX A. 1 of the Zoning Ordinance. N� An 9 in 3A **1 n0 ,� -T r n N O The Application for Permit was denied by the Inspector of Buildings for the following reasons: / The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero- gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for the following reasons: Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings and structures in the same district. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordianance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner. _ Add ess J` GK 'J9'�l Telephone. �r� . . 7��5 ./. /�°zp/. . . . . . ./. . Petitioner. •.;-Q Address.- .�l >/�2Lf��j • �1�9�� Date � Tel e. L� ,, � S" /n�/4p By_ %ZiJC��!.,. . . �? . . . . . . . . . . . Three copies of the application must be filed with the Secretary of the Board of Appeals with a check, for advertising in the amount of. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . four weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals. Check payable to The Evening News. I D '� '9 [7 !:7 ,m.� v � -i u � _, z =_ 0 z � � z _ z R, � ? r. � � z Z � - j p p m O O ^v < � Z G m v p ❑ ❑ . �-� �- i �" _ , . F � -. .,. . , :. � . . .:, . _ . . r , .. iill PLAN OF LAND SALEM, k�§ FPtALS REID LAND 365 CHATHAM S7 1H o�w p EdL(EM, S14d.SS. RALPH WILLIAM •'rte REiD i`_ Np 29422 I - \l sulol 2 cert,Lr tA2t e4* d"M;41 9y .i /at ase60 7J Sbaw.� IvIle RwA� ManSA":t/ol Mans�:e%� %s �adj) �3 Ta/7 Q37..x7 1 ABY, cEpTIFY r0 77ir gsr OF NY MKEDGE NOTE.- THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED FROM A Maar 77F P,;FWISES SHOW ON MIS PLAN ARE NOT TAPE SURVEY AND IS INTENDED FOR LOCATED MI7HIN A FLOOD HAZARD A01 FA AS DELINEA7ED MORTGAGE PURPOSES ONL Y. OFFSETS SHOMN ON 77E W OF COW NITY 125=2-e PREPARED BY 77E ON OR SCALED FROM THIS PLAN, ARE FEDE}7AL bhEA6ENCY A WUSh NT AGENCY OR IT'S APPROXIMATE OX Y AND SHOULD NOT BE s7/CCESSORs LL47ID 8/5/e5. " USED TO DETERMINE PROPERTY LINES. I FUA77£A C9�7TFY IMAT 7NIS INSPEZ'TION MAS PEA- PDRAFZ7 M ACCORDANCE M177Y 7ME '7FC✓lNICAL STAND SCALE 1"= 20' DATE Ma�c/i /� / AOWS FOR 4VR7GAGE LOAN INSPECTIONS' AS ADOPTED BY 5'9/ 77F A/ASSACfS/SET7S ASSOCIATION OA'LAND SL47YEMRS 4, 471 2a/ AND CIM B✓ rAORS. BOOK 6z 9a ef PAGE 3s7 CCER T. THIS CERTIFICATION DOES AVT INCLUDE sAMBS MALLS, Al-MES OR DRIMNAYS AS 77 EY 90 NOT ALMA YS INDICA7F CONTROL # N 9 PROPERTY LINES AMR47R).. M{ PLAN OF LAND IN SALP ,' ol'i�1 S_ 365 CM 7N¢r�st ST 0 0, I 'wL1 -H SS. CITYL ,h§� RALPH �f= .WILLIAM •"� RUO "23422 - ' EJ SUfly° N e v ll 2 cert, C), tAtc C4T rnf-q . � tS'1 q 7J Shawo � G 3, aaoa/es;s o � CGo/naSGr.EeQe9r/ey.�; vo. 0 37./7 .� Johnson s 7-0 Xc I v,E, I NERMY. CERTIFY TO TFE•BEST OF MY KNOMLED6E NOTE.- THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED fROM A 7N4 THE PREMISES SHOMN ON 7HIS PLAN ARE NOT TAPE SURVEY AND IS INTENDED FOR 1.0c47m wrTHrN A FLOOD HAZARD AREA AS DELINEATED MORTGAGE PURPOSES ONLY. OFFSETS SHOWN ON THE MAP OF COAMWrrY r25010z-6 PREPARED BY 77E ON OR SCALED FROM THIS PLAN, ARE FFDE Se?S NCY MANAGEAENT A6ENCY OR rT'S APPROXIMATE ONLY AND SHOULD NOT HE sUCDwDATED 815185. ' USED TO DETERMINE PROPERTY LINES. I FUATmp t�A C69TTFY TNAr THIS INSPECTION MAS PER- USED IN ACCORDANCE WrTH THE 'TECWMAL STAND- SCALE 1"_ 2 0" DATE Ma rc/i /� / ARDS f-VR AVRrSAGE LOAN rA5PECTI0h5' AS ADOPTED BY S 9/ THE MASSAChF/S= ASSOCIATION OF LAND SURVEYORS S 4 7/ 2a/ AAV CIVIL ENGINEERS. BOOK 64'8 3 PAGE 3 S7 CERT. # THIS CERTZFICATrON DOES hOr INCLUDE swtes AALLS. FFNCES OR CRIVEWAYS AS THEY DO NOT ALM YS rhDICATF FROFEArY LINES ACCURATELY M PLAN OF LAND IN SAIL'` , 4PP/7ASS. � f� D, ND RRVEYORS 365 C I�F�, '1 N. MASS. Z Fri. N '. RAIPPHL C .,`.' SS. I: . _ WILLIAM REiO ,I Na.29%21 IL E� e,l fSTSTS .t Cort'• Cr CAa eA* - duni/...y .t /be 2reof 7J SAaww Rw� Mans/:c/d la ns1''i/cj -- 3s•2S - No.(e - A:oL3 .2 E 3 oec.Y Dao a/es is m � fohnS on / sEe�y h a ZIA; Garage '�S 37./7vo.oa J,.J u . s 'I. /EREBY. CERTIFY TO 77F BEST OF NY A'M#LEDGE NOTE. THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED FROM A 7HAT 771E ANISES S!lDMN ON THIS PLAN AHE NOT TAPE SURVEY AND IS INTENDED FOR LOCATED WrMIN A FLOOD HAZARD k A AS DEZINEWED MORTGAGE PURPOSES ONLY. OFFSETS SHOWN ON 771E.K4P OF CaWlhNITY III250f02-8 PHrPARED BY 77E ON OR SCALED FROM THIS PLAN, ARE FIDERAL 999N NCY NANAGEWNT AGENCY O9 IT'S APPROXIMATE OX Y AND SHOULD NOT BE sr OWTORs LLl7ID 8/5/e5. I 'FUA77E:F7 CERTIFY 7NAT THIS INSPECTION MAS PEA- USED TO DETERMINE PROPERTY LINES. FDWM IN ACCORDANCE YrTH 77E "7ECWCAL STAND- SCALE 1"_ 2 0' DATE Ma�c�i /H / ARDS FDR MORTGAGE LOAN IASPECTIONS' AS ADOPTM BY of / 77AF MASS4CNUSET7'• ASSOCIATION OF LAND RRYEYORS J 4 7/ 2a/ AAV CIM ENGINEERS. BOOK 6da 3 PAGE 337 CERT. # THIS CERrrrMTIDN DOER AVT INCLUDE 9RMS MALLS. FENCES OR DRIYEMAYS AS 77EY DO NOT ALMA YS IADIC47F CONTROL # o q/- 0 722 A PROPERTY LD SAMMU7FLY. A.M4. BOARD OF ASSESSORS CITY HALL PAGE., qAi rm mA nj97n ZgQ ty T .... . .. 'E"r P/ 3 L 'ST"'I " . ...... A .......... . l.CERTIFIED 3 ... ..... N44 4 SUBJECT PROPERTYz MAP. 32 LOT: 0238 SUFF. 5 —5 PROPERTY ADDRESS: 0005 BRISTOL STREET' 6 ARRFRSFD OWNER HQj)GLjToN IF-RRCLIJ 1) F 7 AN HOUGHTON WE` o o3 G ,ADD 9 l `��,"MAP, 60T�§QFF�"� * 2PR-OPE K MAIC31M l 1 12 10 13 0 — 14 32 0229 801 0323 LAFAYETTE STREET Ul SWIATYNSKI WALTER 323 LAFAYETTE ST Ul 1 12 FM MA m97n 16 17 13 -k "64WYET- ",,ll,,I I'-," 'T " !STREET."U" "tAFOPCE-REAEE�Ft It ,AY—ET, ST ,E 14 l�x, l, $ 19 20 W t1Ar'AVF n-5 lTvr�, S;TRFF'T .10 WON PF,T,rw'k- 15 .6 SALEM MA 01970 21 0 — 17 32 0229 804 0323 LAFAYETTE STREET U4 DWYER JOYCE j 323 LAFAYETTE ST U4 is SA m mA n.tc?7n �. �l..m, ,"",,, 25 19 k�'0* �J��00229���805�� �,b=.�LAFAYETTE�,ST1REETi" �L.J`Y �TRUST K YE44C�',6 'U5 X, oJ T, F& 2 c l l l,K R 2 212V lgL�! j2s 2 L MAYETTIL STREET, U6 N 72ZI 1z AF A-�C7X-70 h 2 022 SALEM MA 01970 29 23 32 0229 807 0323 LAFAYETTE STREET' U7 CULVER EDWARD A 323 LAFAYETTE ST U7 10 24 CULVFR FQ11 P.F.c; SAI EM PIA n.tgZn 32 ow " 25 Z2 7j,,L 7 AFA 7' 0 LEM 26 MA� 1� A, 3 l '24 0' �,j OpjN8ON "ALqiCE �m,� , �I 27 Z 2 1! 2 ob.1,fLWESJ �A VEN UE>.l 4 glz 1�,��'i s C %13'� CQ1711 f174w l' S%1��P� 316 3� 0 z 28 MIDDLETON MASS 01949 1 F: 02-9 32 0235 0013 WEST AVENUE MANSFIELD JOHN H 13 WEST AVE 3, sn Tc MARGARET' R SALEM MA 0-197 z ? 31 0 8,`2'i 0'2206 4 11 41 WES", U I �H' " ....... T' 0% r,AVENUE �REAR" % . ..�MANSFIELD��-�, ,'q,,4N _334ES� �PIA R(3A'HL T*"R' �Vs 32 . ..... I ell, WEST A`VLAL&� k, ..... -'WET V 3 3 s J^2' b -E, I 1 41 . ......... ..... . 34 KATHLEEN B SALEM MA 01970 03-5 32 0239 0007 BRISTOL STREET BOUDREAU DIANE 7 BRISTOL ST 36 RAFTERY PAUL SALEM MA 01970 " .I 'A 3 7 1 3 Z,i 0 24,1,1 1 b o i,v e.Rl'S T EA% S T RE T w VL6114ZLCWRD" Pr"� Rd,STOL ST� 50 I VES�, R! 6 '� SA T970'" 51 Lo 38 LEI 39 �32� 02'44l: x UUQe'MRTSTOL��STPE& � ;J'41 RF"PT"IRENEL 52 40 JALBERT MARK E SALEM MA 01970 13 0 — L4 41 32 0245 0006 BRISTOL STREET BL.ATTBERG GARY P 6 BRISTOL ST 42 1 SALEM MA 01970 �'ZVIMEIRP14N %EORGE,Z"'ll� 32"0-546' ib,004',ok,f5TOL STREET,' 43 s g 44 § ....... ... 8 -1 9�70 9 SALEM� MA 0 0 I I�I& 45 s 46 61 0 Z7 20 3 48 4 5 49 s j l a so 4 6 0 7 . . ..... .. 52 9 05-3 00 — 71 54 2 'Q, vg 0 3 & CHTE 0 & - CIT '*I/ OF SALE-i'vi , MASSACIHUS " ASSESSORS MAPS -A I 0 �0 ,,,0013 1p �411 500 64 A 0 58()l 648 4900 OON0 652 84 A 19 7773 0, e) e7 60 All a Ao ss 5 560 f 54�4 1,656 -36 b 4690 66 6130 0 )o 41 64 SALEM 1 590 13,.306 24 L !-EAU 7 STATE IA3 COLLEGE b\(b 6-�?j 12,638 1160 81 50 foo 60-5 5# 10 410] '��CWMNEY F 6126 40cr 0 i--EmTT-T,-j\i 7F JX,,CJ- 'ooe ji2i 1-75 PIT :. IN' THIS -_DWA.RE, RYCHARD FEE50plM.,. _77j:'iRLJFL7 _F 10 T C E ul F I H.7 NEARING W A S -Eh.! 7,� -T-- -Nj Tj OIL,' %�::) NO, X=I:� t� %7, • _ ,OPERLY T"-.E :2�',I__ ACCORDANCE WITH MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL J7HAF'7=R Af-)0i F'ET 17 1 ONER IS REQUESTING Tt\1 ORDER TO aaoc.- a ,, IRI THIS ZONE. T H EI-,,T t,-E WH I CH AS I 'l k- -- I MAY 2E ORAN;7 7r. I POIM A FINDING _RY THIS, BOARD THAT:: I -ONDITIONS AND r T C., U J,11 S". C,-, EXIST 1. HIC-' SIP, _IAL - C.,� C , N HS - I- AJ ESPECIALLY AFFECT THE LAND, BUILDING OR STPUC'Tiji::F- INVOLV7D AND WHICH ARE NOT 3_l\J EE R'A L L Y AF FE C T I 1,1 G OTHER LAND. BUILDINGS OR STRUCTURES IN THE EjTSTRICT: _.ITERA.)_ ENFORCEMENT OF THE_ F­RO',,'ISIGNS OF THE ZON, Nc-1 ORDINANCE WOULD INVOLVE r;URSTAINTT,, L HAF.DSHIF , FINANCIAL_ OF. OTHERWISE TO THE F:,ETT-lTON--Ri DESIRABLE RELIEF MAY BE -RAN= [,�IT!JCUll_ SUBST(LNTIAL 0-E-TRI.IENT TO THE PUBLIC GOOD ',ND W17!-;DU-.. NULL I FY 1 NG 7R DEREGATING n 7HIF MT CIF "HE DISTRICT EIR THE PURPOSE OF THE F'Rl',�TNANCEM. THE BOARD OF APPEAL, AFTER CAREFUL CONSIDERATION OF THE EVIDENCE PRESENTED AT THE HEARING MAICES THE FOLI_OWTNG FINDINGS OF FACT: �7 F" 7' =F F F-. L A f-�_ T,T C, EX -T AJH I(. 'j ::7 -r t.-.-::_;,i-._'. ;1!==' t _ :. SUB,: D 1 T F'�� -: GENERCiL.'. IECT EqUr NJOT 71-11 T;-7 T -jF 7,N 1\1 G 1 T- ;.- r-,C, 1, . R. ,'! T' OF 71 - - T.1 EM 7� ORD NPNCE WOU'LD 1 NIVOLVE '-,-! ARDSH I P 0 THE PET 'fl.ONER-. i' FEEL' == ,',H-Y nE DESIR.,�iBL-z. DETRIMENT 71-0 THE PUBLIC GOOD AND ij [T:-fCQ_.1T NLULIFYING OR T)jCjTPj.CT OR THE PLiRPOSE OF THE ORDINANCE . H R,E F OR E -7 HE -Q- NG 17,-DA R D 0r .1F71 PALS kl. -T-D -5 To ?e HE Al! 1 -�1' C E RE F.UP,-T CI.CIi F U B i E C T THE FC:.-.LtMi4I:J' G f 0 ND 1 -IONS: ad 3. Aark p.