106 BRIDGE STREET - SNYDERMAN, LAWRENCE - ZBA 106 Bridge St. R-2
Lawrence Snyderman (Pet) i — -
Systems Improvement (owner) I
K
�o
�n
r
(Zli g of �Ztlem, �xs �ztf �i etts;_
'Paurb of Afrpm.['84 _dFeb���. 6 � 18 x'1
^�OIy146CP�' V P
DECISION ON PETITION OF LAWRENCE SNYDERMAN F0911 ' - 'i ° r
VARIANCE FOR 106 BRIDGE STREET, SALEM
A hearing on this petition was held January 25, 1984 with the following Board
Members present: James Hacker, Chairman; Messrs. , Charnas, Hopper, Luzinski and
Associate Member Bencal. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others
and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in
accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioner requests a Variance. to allow him to enlarge the existing structure and
to conduct an automobile muffler repair and service shop in this R-2 district.
The current owner of the premises is Systembs Improvements, Inc. Petitioner also
requests Variance from minimum lot area, lot width, lot coverage, side yard, front
yard and parking requirements.
The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding of the Board
that:
a. , special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect
the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally
affecting other lands, buildings, and structures in. the same district;
b. literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would in-
volve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner; and
c. desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purposes of the Ordinance.
The Board of Appeal, after hearing the evidence presented at the hearing, makes the
following findings of fact: .
1 . The premises, formerly a car wash, have been in a derelict and
deteriorating condition for approximately one year;
2. The lot is peculiar in shape, is bordered on one side by an old railroad
right of way and on its other three sides by streets - a condition which
makes it impossible to acquire more space;
3.. Because of the site and shape of the lot, a literal enforcement of the
Ordinance would render the property extremely difficult to market in
an area, though R-2, which is heavily commercial.
On the basis of the above findings of fact .and on the evidence presented at the
hearing, the Board concludes as follows:
1 . Special conditions exist which.affect this .lot which do not generally
affect the district;
2. Literal enforcement of the Ordinance would work a substantial hardship
upon the petitioner;
DECISION ON PETITION OF LAWRENCE SNYDERMAN FOR
A VARIANCE FOR 106 BRIDGE STREET
page two Feb. 6
-s4 S3=5 P :,a
3. The Variances can be granted without substantial detriment to the public
good and without substantially derogating from the intent and-pgrpose of
TV r
the Ordinance. CI , '
Therefore; the Board of Appeal voted unanimously to grant the Variances requested
as more fully described in a plan submitted to the Board, provided that:
1 . - Refuse is to be stored indoors on the premises except that refuse may be
stored out doors if in a dumpster surounded by a fence with a gate;
2. Hours of operation to be 7:30a.m. to 6:00 p.m. , Monday through Saturday;
3. The property must be landscaped;
4. All previous non-conforming uses will no longer be permitted; and
5. Gas tanks and pumps on or under the premises must be removed.
" . Scott E. Charnas, Acting Secretary. - -
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK
APPEAL FROM THIS CECISION. IF ANY, SHALL BE MADE PURSUANT TO SECTION 17 OF THE MASS.
GENERAL LAWS, CHAPTER 808. AND SHALL BE FILED WITHIN 20 DAYS AFTER THE DATE OF MI'.!v
OF THIS DECISIGII IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK. -
PURSAINIT TO- ACS. CENERAL C !°. C4APTER 803. SECTIO:: 1I. THE VARIANCE OR SPECIAL K.:V.75
C i.AUtD FI-S.L1, SHALL I iA.E EFFECT UNTIL A CVe,GF Ti DFG 1„7, B°A " THE CE"T-
FICATiO{:-CF THE CITY CLER4-iP.AT 20 DAYS HAV'c ELAPSED AN) %G APPEAL HAS BEI-II r',
_ OR THAT, IF SUCH AY APPEAL HAS BEEN FILE. THAT IT H:S BEEN DISL:ISSED OR NAME
IS
RECORDED IN THE SOUTH ESSEX REGISTRY OF DEEDS AND INDEXED UNDER TII'c NAeIE OF THE C` -
OFRECORDOR IS RECORDED AND NOTED ON THE OWNER'S CERTIFICATE OF TITLE
BOARD OF APPEAL -
1 �
t , G(l5'(!rl, N1. WALL "
l � I
3- '12.'O MYS Ll�Ty : Irl"s
I L
u :.
�L.1 (ZA -e AfZt— A 2 I�' 4`133AYS LEFTS
I r
L Oct FLA t-
1 O
Z u EvJ O.LJ. POOR4 10'6V K 9'•O I+ ;'a KEW `4I4DO:%i'S
ScALt.. gv?IzOrc
/ifA LL
r.- -1
I IA
_ �X1S?rrJli TO 7-6+AAI*4
Ir
L
r
%
t� r �
3 - NEW O.N. CIOORS 10•d' x tO'-O"
6AJNQ rlS 51- (,Ee, LEVATIV�.
Sc4L4 t o It
ALTEPATiDKI5 Lk' 1 D4f- ..
L E ,�A - MA S .
SCALE:M7 NQ j�p9 AHItMRD my: DRAWN By J -j
DALE: I Z'I / ✓ ! REVISED
Plo.
Df v E E J F E r,; 1.AU kEkc: 2 . 5NYDI HW.'
sf -
a/ A�D �I
JAMES -N• O'ALLOO , A- I.A. Aitcorrw DRAWING NUMBER
CAnh3r(t4yb �iF. , 'SALEM . MA446 �►2ELIMI+JA � i'
�q%2< PgIV1F0 ON Nr) :pOOM �.LEAq PRINT
{
k
' 1
i
fLV' �. 1 ✓% r
J
f I
I
1s o "
ALlfA ►
lr kA n�.r�4ti
SCALE: � � � 1 71 APPROVED BY
C : DRAWN BY Ij I�
ryry� f' DATE: 12I I REVISED
• 1 1; I
� � ��� MQrZr3Lr�it/1V � ••'tt,h�i -
I 1 .,. � ft l�E"♦ f{ (:ALLJU / A. I• '1 F` DRAWING NUMBER
/ I
�BE31 PRINTEO ON NO. IJOON(LEARPNINT
I
9Z-O"
10
I
h.
A LTE i4�4Ti e9K i
SA LEM MA
SCALE: II�'I� 11 D„ APPROVED BY: DRAWN BY
DATE: REVISED
F) SOI Efe- LAv+ZFracE tzi SNYD-U,
DRAWING NUMBER
1 CA�,412IU4f LfM
ivxz• rRiu�eo on ao i,nom _�e.Aw�Nr