60 BRIDGE STREET - ASHEGH, GARNIK - ZBA 60 Bridge St. R_2
Garnik Ashegh
b� —
V \
N
V DATE OF HEARING oS
PETITIONER
i
LOCATION lot,
MOTION: 70 GRANT SECOND
TO DENY SECOND
O RE-HEAR SECOND
LEAVE TO WITHDRAW SECOND
0 CONTINUE "If SECOND ( 19
ROLL CALL PRESENT GRANT DENY WITHDRA7l RE-HEAR CONTINUE
RICHARD BENCAL
R1C1AAn ^ZBQdZQ
FRANCIS GREALISH c/
EDWARD LUZINSKI
STEPHEN T^UC11ETTE
ASSOCIATE AEMBERS
ROP]&�B—� UTf�
ARTHUR LABRECOUE
CONDITIONS:
(V
z
DATE OF HEARING a
PETITIONER
LOCATION
MOTION: 70 GRANT -22 SECOND /
TO DENY SECOND
TO RE-HEAR SECOND
LEAVE TO WITHDRAW SECOND
70 CONTINUE SECOND
ROLL CALL PRESENT GRANT DENY :WITHDRAW RE-HEAR CONTINUE
RICHARD GENCAL
Rif +=E'$g{d-Fp
FRANCIS GREALISH
EDWARD LUZINSKI
STEPHEN TOUCHETTE
ASSOCIATE MEMBERS
ROdA�B
ARTHUR LABRECQUE
CONDITIONS:
J.�
y
�1 (Cittl of �ttfem, Anssttrftusetts
-Bnttra of AuVettl
t�
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF GARNICK ASHEGH = n o
FOR A VARIANCE AT 60 BRIDGE ST. (R-2)
A hearing on this petition was held December 9, 1992 and continued CLj
January 27, 1993 with the following Board Members present: Richard
Bencal, Chairman; Francis Grealish, Edward Luzinski, Stephen Touchette
and Associate Member Ronald Plante. Notice of the hearing was sent to
abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published
in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General
Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioner is requesting a Variance to allow six units residential
units in this R-2 district.
The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding of
the Board that:
a. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect
the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally
affecting other lands, buildings or structures in the same district.
b. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance
would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the
petitioner.
c. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to
the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating
from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence
presented at the hearing and after viewing the plans, makes the
following findings of fact:
1. The petitioner to failed demonstrate or to meet the burden of
proof relative to legal hardship.
2. The property is a legal two family dwelling and the prior owner
added the two illegal units.
3. There was opposition to the petitioners request from abutters.
r
i
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF GARNICK ASHEGH
FOR A VARIANCE AT 60 BRIDGE STREET, SALEM
page two
4 . There were complaints concerning trash, noise and problem tenants
on the petitioner's property.
5. The building was not presently owner occupied.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence
presented at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:.-2- _.��
1. Special conditions do not exist which especially affect they
subject property and not the district in general. :c
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance.
would not involve substantial hardship to the petitioner. q
3z
3. The relief requested cannot be granted without substantial n
detriment to the public good or without nullifying and substantially
derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the
Ordinance.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 0-5, against
the motion to grant, having failed to garner the required four
affirmative votes to pass, the motion is defeated and the petition is
denied.
VARIANCE DENIED
January 27, 1993
Stephen C. Touchette, Member
Board of Appeal
A COPY OF THIS DECISIONd HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE
CITY CLERK
APPEAL FROM THIS DECISION, IF ANY, SHALL BE MADE PURSUANT TO SECTION
17 OF THE MGL CHAPTER 40A AND SHALL BE FILED WITHIN 20 DAYS AFTER THE
DATE OF FILING OF THIS DECISION IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK.
PURSUANT TO MGL CHAPTER 40A, SECTION 11, THE VARIANCE OR SPECIAL
PERMIT GRANTED HEREIN SHALL NOT TAKE EFFECT UNTIL A COPY OF THE
DECISION BEARING THE CERTIFICATION OF THE CITY CLERK THAT 20 DAYS HAVE
PASSED AND NO APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED, OR THAT, IF SUCH APPEAL HAS BEEN
FILED, THAT IT HAS BEEN DISMISSED OR DENIED IS RECORDED IN THE SOUTH
ESSEX REGISTRY OF DEEDS AND INDEXED UNDER THE NAME OF THE OWNER OF
RECORD OR IS RECORDED AND NOTED ON THE OWNER'S CERTIFICATE OF TITLE.
BOARD OF APPEAL
t
s�
(City of �ttfem, ,Iffltzssachusetts
-Board of Aupenl
r..
, C L
W
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF GARNICK ASHEGH C --.' o
FOR A VARIANCE AT 60 BRIDGE ST. (R-2)
A hearing on this petition was held December 9, 1992 and continued
U �o
January 27, 1993 with the following Board Members present: Richard
Bencal, Chairman; Francis Grealish, Edward Luzinski, Stephen Touchette
and Associate Member Ronald Plante. Notice of the hearing was sent to
abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published
in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General
Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioner is requesting a Variance to allow six units residential
units in this R-2 district.
The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding of
the Board that:
a. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect
the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally
affecting other lands, buildings or structures in the same district.
b. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance
would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the
petitioner.
c. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to
the public good and without nullifving or substantially derogating
from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence
presented at the hearing and after viewing the plans, makes the
following findings of fact:
1. The petitioner to failed demonstrate or to meet the burden of
proof relative to legal hardship.
2. The property is a legal two family dwelling and the prior owner
added the two illegal units.
3. There was opposition to the petitioners request from abutters.
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF GARNICK ASHEGH
FOR A VARIANCE AT 60 BRIDGE STREET, SALEM
page two
4 . There were complaints concerning trash, noise and problem tenants
on the petitioner's property.
5. The building was not presently owner occupied.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence
presented at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:.-_' _:
1. Special conditions do not exist which especially affect the
subject property and not the district in general.
GJ
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance ': —u',
would not involve substantial hardship to the petitioner.
- T--
3. The relief requested cannot be granted without substantial
. w
detriment to the public good or without nullifying and substantially
derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the
Ordinance.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 0-5, against
the motion to grant, having failed to garner the required four
affirmative votes to pass, the motion is defeated and the petition is
denied.
VARIANCE DENIED
January 27, 1993
Stephen C. Touchette, Member
Board of Appeal
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE
CITY CLERK
APPEAL FROM THIS DECISION, IF ANY, SHALL BE MADE PURSUANT TO SECTION
17 OF THE MGL CHAPTER 40A AND SHALL BE FILED WITHIN 20 DAYS AFTER THE
DATE OF FILING OF THIS DECISION IN THE OFFICE OF THE Ci TY CLERK.
PURSUANT TO MGL CHAPTER 40A, SECTION 11, THE VARIANCE OR SPECIAL
PERMIT GRANTED HEREIN SHALL NOT TAKE EFFECT UNTIL A COPY OF THE
DECISION BEARING THE CERTIFICATION OF THE CITY CLERK THAT 20 DAYS HAVE
PASSED AND NO APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED, OR THAT, IF SUCH APPEAL HAS BEEN
FILED, THAT IT HAS BEEN DISMISSED OR DENIED IS RECORDED IN THE SOUTH
ESSEX REGISTRY OF DEEDS AND INDEXED UNDER THE NAME OF THE OWNER OF
RECORD OR IS RECORDED AND NOTED ON THE OWNER'S CERTIFICATE OF TITLE.
BOARD OF APPEAL
{ i
4
Ctu of ulem, �3rTttssttchusetta
t . Boara of Au}zenl
;\ $
m
rri o .L
T
C
(.1 i W
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF GARNICK ASHEGH =m o
FOR A VARIANCE AT 60 BRIDGE ST. (R-2) =
A hearing on this petition was held December 9, 1992 and continued^ c.o
January 27, 1993 with the following Board Members present: Richard
Bencal, Chairman; Francis Grealish, Edward Luzinski, Stephen Touchette
and Associate Member Ronald Plante. Notice of the hearing was sent to
abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published
in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General
Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioner is requesting a Variance to allow six units residential
units in this R-2 district.
The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding of
the Board that:
a. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect
the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally
affecting other lands, buildings or structures in the same district.
b. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance
would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the
petitioner.
c. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to
the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating
from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence
presented at the hearing and after viewing the plans, makes the
following findings of fact:
1. The petitioner to failed demonstrate or to meet the burden of
proof relative to legal hardship.
2. The property is a legal two family dwelling and the prior owner
added the two illegal units.
3. There was opposition to the petitioners request from abutters.
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF GARNICK ASHEGH
FOR A VARIANCE AT 60 BRIDGE STREET, SALEM
page two
4 . There were complaints concerning trash, noise and problem tenants
on the petitioner's property.
5. The building was not presently owner occupied.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence
presented at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:.-.2
1. Special conditions do not exist which especially affect the
subject property and not the district in general.
w
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance _d
would not involve substantial hardship to the petitioner. —
3. The relief requested cannot be granted without substantial
w
detriment to the public good or without nullifying and substantially
derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the
Ordinance.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 0-5, against
the motion to grant, having failed to garner the required four
affirmative votes to pass, the motion is defeated and the petition is
denied.
VARIANCE DENIED
January 27, 1993
Stephen C. Touchette, Member
Board of Appeal
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE
CITY CLERK
APPEAL FROM THIS DECISION, IF ANY, SHALL BE MADE PURSUANT TO SECTION
17 OF THE MGL CHAPTER 40A AND. SHALL BE FILED WITHIN 20 DAYS AFTER THE
DATE OF FILING OF THIS DECISION IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK.
PURSUANT TO MGL CHAPTER 40A, SECTION 11, THE VARIANCE OR SPECIAL
PERMIT GRANTED HEREIN SHALL NOT TAKE EFFECT UNTIL A COPY OF THE
DECISION BEARING THE CERTIFICATION OF THE CITY CLERK THAT 20 DAYS HAVE
PASSED AND NO APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED, OR THAT, IF SUCH APPEAL HAS BEEN
FILED, THAT IT HAS BEEN DISMISSED OR DENIED IS RECORDED IN THE SOUTH
ESSEX REGISTRY OF DEEDS AND INDEXED UNDER THE NAME OF THE OWNER OF
RECORD OR IS RECORDED AND NOTED ON THE OWNER'S CERTIFICATE OF TITLE.
BOARD OF APPEAL
J
(L; Itt7 of _'�tzfem, ,f itssuchusetts
_I
-9nttra of Appeal
W
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF GARNICK ASHEGH
FOR A VARIANCE AT 60 BRIDGE ST. (R-2) =
A hearing on this petition was held December 9, 1992 and continued cd
January 27, 1993 with the following Board Members present: Richard
Bencal, Chairman; Francis Grealish, Edward Luzinski, Stephen Touchette
and Associate Member Ronald Plante. Notice of the hearing was sent to
abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published
in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General
Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioner is requesting a Variance to allow six units residential
units in this R-2 district.
The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding of
the Board that:
a. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect
the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally
affecting other lands, buildings or structures in the same district.
b. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance
would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the
petitioner.
c. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to
the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating
from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence
presented at the hearing and after viewing the plans, makes the
following findings of fact:
1 . The petitioner to failed demonstrate or to meet the burden of
proof relative to legal hardship.
2. The property is a legal two family dwelling and the prior owner
added the two illegal units.
3. There was opposition to the petitioners request from abutters.
i
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF GARNICK ASHEGH
FOR A VARIANCE AT 60 BRIDGE STREET, SALEM
page two
4 . There were complaints concerning trash, noise and problem tenants
on the petitioner's property.
5. The building was not presently owner occupied.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence
presented at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:,-.2
1. Special conditions do not exist which especially affect the
subject property and not the district in general. `
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance _.: ' .-;
would not involve substantial hardship to the petitioner.
- -r
3. The relief requested cannot be granted without substantial n `Q
w
detriment to the public good or without nullifying and substantially
derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the
Ordinance.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 0-5, against
the motion to grant, having failed to garner the required four
affirmative votes to pass, the motion is defeated and the petition is
denied.
VARIANCE DENIED
January 27, 1993
Stephen C. Touchette, Member
Board of Appeal
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE
CITY CLERK
APPEAL FROM THIS DECISION, IF ANY, SHALL BE MADE PURSUANT TO SECTION
17 OF THE MGL CHAPTER 40A AND SHALL BE FILED WITHIN 20 DAYS AFTER THE
DATE OF FILING OF THIS DECISION IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK.
PURSUANT TO MGL CHAPTER 40A, SECTION 11, THE VARIANCE OR SPECIAL
PERMIT GRANTED HEREIN SHALL NOT TAKE EFFECT UNTIL A COPY OF THE
DECISION BEARING THE CERTIFICATION OF THE CITY CLERK THAT 20 DAYS HAVE
PASSED AND NO APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED, OR THAT, IF SUCH APPEAL HAS BEEN
FILED, THAT IT HAS BEEN DISMISSED OR DENIED IS RECORDED IN THE SOUTH
ESSEX REGISTRY OF DEEDS AND INDEXED UNDER THE NAME OF THE OWNER OF
RECORD OR IS RECORDED AND NOTED ON THE OWNER'S CERTIFICATE OF TITLE.
BOARD OF APPEAL
Chi of �ttlrm, ,�ttssttclTusetta
__-
�- � Bnttrd of A�ezil
r,
w
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF GARNICK ASHEGH
FOR A VARIANCE AT 60 BRIDGE ST. (R-2) _ m
A hearing on this petition was held December 9, 1992 and continued �^
January 27, 1993 with the following Board Members present: Richard
Bencal, Chairman; Francis Grealish, Edward Luzinski, Stephen Touchette
and Associate Member Ronald Plante. Notice of the hearing was sent to
abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published
in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General
Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioner is requesting a Variance to allow six units residential
units in this R-2 district.
The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding of
the Board that:
a. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect
the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally
affecting other lands, buildings or structures in the same district.
b. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance
would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the
petitioner.
c. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to
the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating
from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence
presented at the hearing and after viewing the plans, makes the
following findings of fact:
1. The petitioner to failed demonstrate or to meet the burden of
proof relative to legal hardship.
2. The property is a legal two family dwelling and the prior owner
added the two illegal units.
3. There was opposition to the petitioners request from abutters.
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF GARNICK ASHEGH
FOR A VARIANCE AT 60 BRIDGE STREET, SALEM
page two
4 . There were complaints concerning trash, noise and problem tenants
on the petitioner's property.
5. The building was not presently owner occupied.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence
presented at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:.- 2 -. .. '
1. Special conditions do not exist which especially affect the ;2-
subject
2subject property and not the district in general.
W
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance - r_b
would not involve substantial hardship to the petitioner.
3. The relief requested cannot be granted without substantial n
c.s
detriment to the public good or without nullifying and substantially
derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the
Ordinance.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 0-5, against
the motion to grant, having failed to garner the required four
affirmative votes to pass, the motion is defeated and the petition is
denied.
VARIANCE DENIED
January 27, 1993
z�G2�pirt� —✓tt-c�-r� �r
Stephen C. Touchette, Member
Board of Appeal
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE
CITY CLERK
APPEAL FROM THIS DECISION, IF ANY, SHALL BE MADE PURSUANT TO SECTION
17 OF THE MGL CHAPTER 40A AND SHALL BE FILED WITHIN 20 DAYS AFTER THE
DATE OF FILING OF THIS DECISION IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK.
PURSUANT TO MGL CHAPTER 40A, SECTION 11, THE VARIANCE OR SPECIAL
PERMIT GRANTED HEREIN SHALL NOT TAKE EFFECT UNTIL A COPY OF THE
DECISION BEARING THE CERTIFICATION OF THE CITY CLERK THAT 20 DAYS HAVE
PASSED AND NO APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED, OR THAT, IF SUCH APPEAL HAS BEEN
FILED, THAT IT HAS BEEN DISMISSED OR DENIED IS RECORDED IN THE SOUTH
ESSEX REGISTRY OF DEEDS AND INDEXED UNDER THE NAME OF THE OWNER OF
RECORD OR IS RECORDED AND NOTED ON THE OWNER'S CERTIFICATE OF TITLE.
BOARD OF APPEAL
POARD-O:F-A'PPEAt% APPEAL CASE NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
ofttlEm, � tt��ttzltusEffs
'Boarb of Apprlil
�Recomn. ppl�L�C�:l�!.E:�
TO T*-'
BU ,
��yy�� Uh SAPAEA LS S
-he Undersigneg represent that he s are `he owners cf a certain oarcei of land located
at '10. . . . . . . . .60 Bridge trees; m na Oistrict. .R2 . .
.
ano said oarcei is affected by Section(s ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
of the Massacnusetts State Building Code.
Plans describing the work proposed, have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in
accordance with Section IX A. 1 of the Zoning Ordinance.
The only work being done is interior remodeling. The building is currently a six
unit building and was purchased as such. After being informed that two of the units
are illegal I am requesting a variance to allow the two exiting units to be considered
legal.
"he !�.00l ,:caticn for Permit was denied by the Inspector of Buildings for the following
reasons :
The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem
Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to
approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said
Zonino v-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary
hardshio . to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero-
gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for
n 2
the following reasons : n
r K
mo CD
G rn F
rn
T D
LA;
Owner. . Gacnik. Ashegh. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • • • • •
P.O. Box 3074 Peabody, MA 01961
Address. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Telephone. �508)352-2240
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Petitioner. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Jate. . . ll(18/92. . . . . . . . . . . Telephone. . . . . .DD. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
By. . .,,hYO, � . . . . . . . . . .
Three copies of the application must be filed with the Secretary of the Board of
Appeals with a check, for advertising in the amount of. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . .
four weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals. Check payable to The
Evening News.
m -+
� _ - -
o _ _
Z � � z z
- > � -
a - � z
Z F. _ >
i Z >
m n ' z —
I
o ;n
❑ ❑
is
� �l
CITY OF SALEM
MASSACHUSETTS 01970
From The Office Of
ASSESSORS January 26, 19 93
(508)745-9595 Ext.261
Totwhom it may concern:
The property at 60 Bridge Street has been
assessed as a six-family residence since
calendar date 1-1-85 (Fiscal Year 1986) .
Assessors Office
City Hall
93 Washington St
Salem, Ma 01970
City of Salem
Zoning Board of Appeal
One Salem Green
Salem, MA 01970
Gentlemen-;
We the undersigned would like .to go on record as being in favor
of the petition of Garnick Ashegh for variances to allow six residential
units at 60 Bridge. St. z.nd
--7Ga-,JA
/%Ay-e1 �.
C0S01T,
\i\q C1,�—o :
Salem Historical L'ommission
ONE SALEM GREEN,SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970
(508)745-9595 EXT.311 -
December 14 , 1992
Richard Bencal, Chairman
Board of Appeal
One Salem Green
Salem, MA 01970
RE: 60 Bridge Street
Dear Chairman Bencal :
The Salem Historical Commission understands that the petition
for 60 Bridge Street was continued from the December 9 „ 1992
meeting until the next meeting of the Board of Appeal .
The Commission has enclosed a building survey form for 60
Bridge Street which indicates that the building was constructed in
1913 and is one of only two triple-deckers in the Bridge Street
area. While the Commission takes no position on the petition, we
are hopeful that any alterations or new construction approved will
be sympathetic to the historic architecture of the buildings and
their neighborhoods . In this regard, we would be pleased to offer
design review, should the Board of Appeal request such services .
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
THE SALEM HISTORICAL COMMISSION
Annie C. Harris
Chairman
JG\JG\BOAnov9
FORK B - BUILDING
AREA FORM NO.
MASSACHUSETTS HISTORICAL COMMISSION Z9-69
80 BOYLSTON STREET
BOSTON, MA 02116
Salem
;s 60 Bridge Street
0�4
®r --Jj .-.r '1C Name
71
Present Residential
Original Residential
PTION
1913
Salem Directories
Triple-decker
me VI. . ect
Sketch Map: Draw ®p showing property's location
in relation to nearest cross streets and/or Exterior Mall Fabric Aluminum siding
geographical features. Indicate all buildings
between inventoried property and nearest Outbuildings Garage
intersection(s).
Indicate north
Ni t Major Alterations (with dates)
3
4 Condition
T E
QMoved Date
t CZo,,l Acreage ±5700 sq.ft.
Sr Setting Denselv settled
UTM REFERENCE Recorded by M. Malaguti/K, Murphy
USGS QUADRANGLE OrganizationSalem Planning Dept.
SCALE Date 1oAS
NATIONAL REGISTER CRITERIA STATEMENT (if applicable)
ARCHITECTURAL SIGNIFICANCE Describe important architectural features and evaluate in terms c
other buildings within the community.
This is one of only two triple-deckers in the Bridge Street area and for this reason
assumes much architectural significance. The building type, so popular in high density areas
in and around Boston, was a logical early 20th century manifestation in the Bridge Street are.
which had many working class families to house.
HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE Explain the role owners played in local or state history and how the
building relates to the development of the community.
This triple-decker relates to the continued industrial growth of the Bridge Street
neighborhood in the early years of the 20th century. Only ten years prior to this residence's
construction (1903) a substantial shoe manufacturing industrial struction was erected nearby
between Saunders and Pearl Streets. This site had been industrialized since the 1860s.
Bridge Street's significance to the industrial development and importance of Salem at large is
reflected in the continued erection of working class residences.
i
BIBLIOGRAPHY and/or REFERENCES
alem maps and directories
ss, Henry C. "Manufacturing interest," in History of Essex County, MA, 1888, D. Hamilton
Hurd, comp.
8/85
i
j
DATE Of PERMIT PERMIT No. OWNER LOCATION
10/5/92 457-92 GARNIK ASHEGH 60 BRIDGE STREET R-2
STRUCTURE MATERIAL DIMENSIONS No.OF STORIES No.Of FAMILIES WARD COST
DWELLING WOOD FRAME 3 I 4 12 $8,000. rem
BUILDER
10/5/92 #457-92 REMODEL KIT=S ON SECOND & THIRD FLOORS, BLUE BOARD, ELECTRICAL
NEW WINDOWS, COST '$8,000. fee $53.00 ---------------------------------D.H.
cjo� � 3��
P��M..coVnlTi,�Gc
m "
p
Salem Historical Commission
ONE SALEM GREEN,SALEM,MASSACHUSETTS 01970
(508)745-9595 EXT.311
December 14, 1992
Richard Bencal, Chairman
Board of Appeal
One Salem Green
Salem, MA 01970
RE : 60 Bridge Street
Dear Chairman Bencal :
The Salem Historical Commission understands that the petition
for 60 Bridge Street was continued from the December 9 , 1992
meeting until the next meeting of the Board of Appeal .
The Commission has enclosed a building survey form for 60
Bridge Street which indicates that the building was constructed in
1913 and is one of only two triple-deckers in the Bridge Street
area. While the Commission takes no position on the petition, we
are hopeful that any alterations or new construction approved will
be sympathetic to the historic architecture of the buildings and
their neighborhoods . In this regard, we would be pleased to offer
design review, should the Board of Appeal request such services .
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
THE SALEM HISTORICAL COMMISSION
Annie C. Harris
Chairman
JG\JG\BOAnov9
y
FORM" B - BUILDING
AREA FORM NO.
MASSACHUSETTS HISTORICAL COMMISSION 2-939
80 BOYLSTON STREET
BOSTON, MA 02116
Salem
. X�
is 60 Bridge Street
•i c Name
9, it
fPresent Residential
'! Original Residential
PTIONF-
Salem Directories
Triple-
decker
ect
Sketch Map: Draw ®p showing property's location
in relation to nearest cross streets and/or Exterior Mall Fabric Aluminum siding
geographical features. Indicate all buildings
between inventoried property and nearest Outbuildings Garage
intersection(s).
Indicate north
Major Alterations (with dates)
K Condition
$vQ �
NS�pE G
"'DEBT E
QMoved Date
* czar Acreage ±5700 sq.ft.
c Tr Setting Densely settled
UTM REFERENCE Recorded by M. Malaguti/K. Murphy
USGS QUADRANGLE Organization Salem Planning Dent.
SCALE Date 1QRS
NATIONAL REGISTER CRITERIA STATEMENT (if applicable)
ARCHITECTURAL SIGNIFICANCE Describe important architectural features and evaluate in terms of
other buildings within the community.
This is one of only two triple-deckers in the Bridge Street area and for this reason
assumes much architectural significance. The building type, so popular in high density areas
in and around Boston, was a logical early 20th century manifestation in the Bridge Street area
which had many working class families to house.
HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE Explain the role owners played in local or state history and how the
building relates to the development of the community.
This triple-decker relates to the continued industrial growth of the Bridge Street
ne%hbo hood in the early years of the 20th century. Only ten years prior to this residence's
construction (1903) a substantial shoe manufacturing industrial struction was erected nearby
between Saunders and Pearl Streets. This site had been industrialized since the 1860s.
Bridge Street's significance to the industrial development and importance of Salem at large is
reflected in the continued erection of working class residences.
BIBLIOGRAPHY and/or REFERENCES
alem maps and directories
ss, Henry C. "Manufacturing interest," in History of Essex County, MA, 1888, D. Hamilton
Hurd, comp.
8/85
CITY
BOARD OE SALEM
OF est Will
lin the Public he9 ngL APPEAL - !I
'O'nitA�SIfora Variance bmittedllby G ns inter-
. to be held BRIDGE STREtO allow six residential
CR
NoveAT .00 P.MWR HEA�EM GR EEMBER 9Said e 10921
tuber 25; Decembe 2, B992,se on dflloor
' _ SN14370
1 BOACITRY OF SALEM
' D OF APPEAL
Will hold a 745-9595 Ext. 381
ested in the public hearing for all persons inter-
j ASHEGH for petition submitted by GARNICK
units at 60 BRIDGEa Variance to allow six residential
to be held WEDNESDAY,DECEMBER gearing
AT 7:00 P.M.,ONE SALEM GREEN,second floor.
November 25 RICHARD
2,A. Bgg CAL, Chairman
SN14379 _
. CITY OF SALEM
BOARD OF APPEAL
745-9595 Ext. 381
Will hold a public hearing for all persons inter-
. ested in the petition submitted by GARNICE
ASHEGH for a Variance to allow six residential
units at 60 BRIDGE STREET(R-2). Said hearing
to be held WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 9, 1992
AT 7:00 P.M.,ONE SALEM GREEN,second floor.
RICHARD A. BENCAL, Chairman
November 25; December 2, 1992 SN14379
w APPEAL CASE NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
BOARD OF APPrAlS
Ctu of 'sate Its 49assar4use##s
�. Cpl 16 11 33 P loIIttrb of c ,"rnl
TO THE BOARI)CO AP
P7 kLFS'1'1 A55.
The Undersigned represent that he is are the owners of a certain parcel of land located
at NO. . . . 60 Bridge : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Street; Zoning District. g2. . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : and said parcel is affected by Section(s) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
of the Massachusetts State Building Code.
Plans describing the work proposed, have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in
accordance with Section IX A. 1 of the Zoning Ordinance.
The only work being done is interior remodeling. The building is currently a six
unit building and was purchased as such. After being informed that two of the units
are illegal I am requesting a variance to allow the two exiting units to be considered
legal.
The Application for Permit was denied by the Inspector of Buildings for the following
reasons:
The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem
Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to
approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said
Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary
hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero-
gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for
the following reasons:
C> x
0
r-
m o Qp
x�
rn'n
r-
L9
� tV
Owner. . Garnik Ashegh ,, , , , „ . . . .
AddressP•0: Box 3074 Peabodyl MA, 01961, , , , , ,
Telephone. 508)352=2240, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Petitioner. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Address. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Date. . . .lM§/92, , , , , , , , , ,
Telephone. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
By. . . .( 19 sem. . . . . . . . . . . . .
Three copies of the application must be filed with the Secretary of the Board of
Appeals with a check, for advertising in the amount of. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . ... . .
four weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals. Check payable to The
Evening News.
PETITION TO BOARD OF APPEALS
LOCATION
................................................................
PETITIONER..........................................
ADDRESS...............................................
................................................
r
CONDII IONS
.................................................................
........................ .......................................
.................................................................
.................................................................
,PETITION APPROVED.................... ❑
DENIED.........................
.............................................. 19.........
C.,
kj=� I �'
i
I
I I I i i I I i I I
I I I
00�
-- -- - --- -'^- - - -5ATM- '----- ��I
- - --i- !- �OW� RAS► - - -- --T-� -7-
I
ice .-
I I I
� -
I
- IIII
i
J
- I
I ! I I ! !
- - - ! + AA
rill
uAl
i-
1I
_
Li
11 it _T 1
I
I � ,
I
i � -
II
I i ,
--- ---- ---- ----,, -F = --- - --- -T-_--i
I I i-
-BwTfl - -
oowntol � ,
! l
7-77,
Hill
I
MORTGAGE INSPECTION -
$AY STATE SURVEYING ASSOCIATES
CABOT ST., BEVERLY MA
LOCATION : SALE SS NOTES:
-- y------ ,c_..- -----•-----••
This is a Mort
SCALE + 1° = .3 D FT. DATE : _•_��Z Z�j`�Z gage Inspection survey and not an
REFERENCE + ,,.:�K 7&Z--'7 3 3 instrument survey,therefore this plot plan is for
._-P(z:..... ........... mortgage inspection purposes only. .
•This survey is based on survey marks of others.
-.-------- -------------- -------------- •Bushes,shrubs,fences and tree lines do not
To - necessarily indicate property lines.
In my professional opinion the building(s)are not located
I hereby certify that I have examined the premises and that the in the special flood hazard zone,as defined by H.U.D.
buildings)shown on this plan are located on the ground as •Whenever an offset is 1'±or less,an instrument survey
shown and that ey conformed to the zoning setbacks of the is recommended to determine prop.lines.
--------- when constructed. •Offsets shown are approximate by tape survey.
L01 156
i
' 6 ' .
1 3 4 5 C'
liI
in W
*_
IM
H r(Ln
N V +
9 W
Loi 5 3 9nr.Wa 1 —
4- X60 13 s Q
Z
t
2 Z-7 +
�ao�� tn OF
December 9, 1992
City of Salem
Board of Appeal
Gentlemen:
I would like to ask the Board to continue my petition for
60 Bridge Street until the next available meeting. I agree to waive
any time requirements under the law and any other conditions the Board
may impose on this request.
Respectfully,
December 9, 1992
r
City of Salem
Board of Appeal
Gentlemen:
I would like to ask the Board to continue my petition for
60 Bridge Street until the next available meeting. I agree to waive
any time requirements under the law and any other conditions the Board
may impose on this request.
Respectfully,
MORTGAGE INSPECTION
aBAY STATE SURVEYING ASSOCIATES
'234 CABOT ST.; BEVERLY MA
LOCATION
ON J -- NOTES:SCALE = i" = 30FL DATE : This
a Mortgage Inspection survey and not an
REFERENCE r .,.:�K' 7&Z'2 •f'�:3�9 instrument survey,therefore this plot plan is for
---------- -- mortgage inspection purposes only.
•--�� C�?r 5�• _ __ __ __ -This survey is based on survey marks of others.
^ __________ ___________________________- •Bushes,shrubs,fences and tree lines do not
To __ Q (//4N7/91oE �3iQ.tJ(L necessarily indicate property lines.
ocated
I hereby certify that I have examined the premises and that the •in thIn e special tflo d onal hazard zoneinion the ,as defined by H.U.D.are not
building(s)shown on this plan are located on the ground as -Whenever an offset is.1't or less,an instrument survey
shown and that they conformed to the zoning setbacks of the is recommended to determine prop. lines. '
C�? _ S✓9L�`��1. --- when constructed. •Offsets shown are approximate by tape survey-
Lo T
urvey.LoT IS76
6
2. 3
y
5. 4-9
V�QfWL�
)
5r.Wa4- Z
e—
1
'
I
ori IN ov riti
NO. 28094
tEHE� dao
MORTGAGE INSPECTION
::BAY STATE SURVEYING ASSOCIATES"'
234 CABOT ST., BEVERLY MA
LDCATION = SALE/11 /!� SS, NOTES:
SCALE 1° = 30 FT GATE :__ Z •This is a Mortgage Inspection survey and not an
instrument survey,therefore this plot plan is for
REFERENCE _..LB� -----------
_�1,-'C7?&�Z-7 �P
----S- ... mortgage insaction purposesonly.
_ —'?1,57....__._..__ •This survey is based on survey marks of others.
----------- -------------- -------------- •Bushes,shrubs,fences and tree lines do not
To _. ���4NyAlaE �I�JlL necessarily indicate property lines_
'"� '---------------
- •In my professional opinion the building(s)are not located
I hereby certify that 1 have examined the premises and that the in the special flood hazard zone,as defined by H.U.D.
building(s)shown on this plan are located on the ground as •Whenever an offset is 1't or less,an instrument survey
shown and that they conformed to the zoning setbacks of the is recommended to determine prop. lines.
Cr7 s!gr !
--------- when constructed. •Offsets shown are approximate by tape survey.
LoT 156
1 3 4 5 b �
In t11
r lY
N U,
9
-LOT5 3 srr.Wa 1 —
I 4- X60 13 4 Q
ti
�3 l E ST K=7
0 or k4r
o No. H
^, B 26094 e
iP$OkF�BiER dao
+n S�'
b / n
4D
/4-,i
oj
7 J r
�
•.- Rg5a �j
`/^`/
s6,00
� -k uzrl � r * ->s - .. b O1 x P) G1 - .4 ° e f$�•.�
M\
3
E
930 E-
040
R no_s/g50 9 oAco -4 o
...,.��GY .. Cb
y . . .. _ n0I 0 0.:. a� .
cm a
R.k!N .3
I Q �� o
w
q W s� _f. za _ =..z•V s ... ��.mak Oy-0 00 0�_ d+ •~.
�A W � Z� C O
4 0
* 4 .
0CAI �
41 BOARD OF ASSESSORS
CITY HALL PAGE.
71N
....SAL "I
2 E 2
Abb
4
3
4 5
SUBJECT PROPERTY: 111AP. 36 LOT: 0155 SUF7F
PROPERTY ADDRESS: 0060 BRIDGE STREET
7 ASSESSED OWNER d MONTANA REALT
Y, TRUST:, 9
8 SULDENSKI JOHN, J ' JR TR- 0
9 11
12
10 14AP LOT BUFF PROPERTY WD—DRESS ARESS 13
0 1 4
:2 36 0.155 0060 BRIDGE STREET MONTANA REALTY TRUST 82 DERBY SET #-1 :50
16
13 ---"SQLTZ-NSKI j`ORN-j- 1rR—TH111 uAt —MA701970 17
4 , 36 0-154 pO6 ' E1RIGGh STREt T+ -TACHE GEORGE R 62 BRII'Gh-, ST"
9
'YICTORIA�111, SALEM MA
5 01970
16 36 0-156 0005 60PNSIft SIRELf PJAKIIM5 JU,';L G U Z6 VKUUIVK
0 :7 ROSE 5 PEABODY MA 01960 22 0
a 36 0157 0007 BURNSIDE STREET SAWUL.SKI CHESTER 7 BURNSIDE ST 2310
24
aALEi 1�1 IA'0.197 25
N'M�,jAR 26
...........
"r r
2 .......
........... ,�"I"";
. .............. ........... 270
21 .............
....� SAL 26
22 36 0151 UU64 bHiVbL Z�IKLLJ V T -'s 29
0 23 LUANA 0 SALEM MA 01970 30
24 36 0169 0058 BRIDGE STREET SAGRADO, REALTY TRUST 87 FEDERAL ST ✓ 310
32
25 5ALEM-PTA UlYolu 33
26
c 'VALE
--RUCKFY� A - � ...... .... 90,.KERNWOOD% AVE3• 4
.'.,
0 ......
ARk
27 BEVERLY MA 0I9115 35
280 ;euc UU61 uRfouL 5 1 Rh.E I CXRNEVAt:E—R(XCKF-Y- A 90—KERNWOOD—AVE — 37
29 BEVERLY MA 01915 38
0 so
30 36 0295 0057 BRIDGE STREET 59 GEORGILAKIS REALTY TRUST 51A BRIDGE ST 40
31 SACE M—PrA-01-970 41
0 32 42
430
33 ........ .. ..... .
44
34 49
35 46
0 470
36 48
437 ...... 7777�
591
0 51
................
.......... ... ..... 5
3: 'o
40 53
41 4
0 :so ,z
42
56
a3. . .......... 57
.......... .........-,
44 ... ....... .......
5:0
45 %,, 60
..............
46 61
47 62
0 6310
48 64
49 65
66
50
67
51
........ 68
52 i-9
0 53 70
710
54 72
55;. ......
------------------------ 73
w" .......
...... -:PETERAI:� CARON: 74
ftl-
0 750
7 7
7j
CITY (IF SALEM
BOARD OF APPEAL
745-9595 Ext. 381
Will hold a public hearing for all persons inter- _
ested in the petition submitted by PAULA AND
ZAIIER BDIWI fora Variance to convert an exist-
ing two family into a three family dwelling at 6-
6Y: HANCOCK ST.(R-2). Said hearing to be held
WEDNESDAY.JANUARY 27,1993 AT 7:00 P.M.,
ONE SALEM GREEN, second floor.
RICHARD A. BENCAL, Chairman
(January 13,-2-0, 1993 SN12669
CITV OF SALEM
BOARD OF APPEAL
745-9595 Ext. 381
Will hold a public hearing for all persons inter-
ested in the petition submitted by DEIULIS BROS.
CONST. CO. for Variances to allow construction
of single family dwelling at MOONEY AND DUR-
�KIN RDS. (11-1/11C). Said hearing to be held
WEDNESDAY,JANUARY 27,1993 AT 7:00 P.M.,
ONE SALEM GREEN, second Floor.
RICHARD A. BENCAL, Chairman
January 13, 20, 1993 SN83509
CITYOF SALEM
BOARD OF APPEAL
745-9595 Ext. 381
Will hold a public hearing for all persons inter-
ested in the petition submitted by ANTHONY J.
inter-
ested
for a Special Permit to extend the -
height of the garage at 127 CANAL STREET(13-
(4) to make a peak roof. Said hearing to be held
WEDNESDAY,JANUARY 27,1993 AT 7:00 P.M.,
ONE SALEM GREEN, second Boor.
RICHARD A. BENCAL, Chairman
,January 13, 20, 1993 SN12668
CITY OF SALEM
BOARD OF APPEAL
795-9595 Ext. 381
Will hold.a public hearing for all persons inter-
jested in the petition submitted by RITA&ROBT.
ESANTIS/F.J. LIVAS, JR: for variances from
area & front yard setback to allow property
be divided at 65 BRIDGE/6 E. COLLINS/9
THROP STS.(13-4/R-2).Said hearing to be held
WEDNESDAY,JANUARY 27,1993 AT 7:00 P.M.,
ONE SALEM GREEN, second Boor.
RICHARD A. BENCAL, Chairman
January 13, 20, 1993 SN12670
CITY OF SALEM
BOARD OF APPEAL
745-9595 Ext. 381
Will hold a public hearing for all persons inter-
ested in the petition submitted by ROBT.
HARRINGTON, TR. for a Variance to allow con-
struction of a single family dwelling and garage
at 2 BERTUCCIO AVE. (R-1). Said hearing to be
held WEDNESDAY,JANUARY 27,1993 AT 7:00
P.M., ONE SALEM GREEN, second Boor.
RICHARD A. BENCAL, Chairman
January 13, 20, 1993 SN83508
CI'1.1OF SALEM _
BOARD OF APPEAL
745-9595 Ext. '381
Will hold a public hearing liar all persons inter-
ested in the petition submitted by PAULA AND
ZAHER BDI WI for a Variance to convert all exist-
ing two family into a three family dwelling at 6-
_6" HANCOCK ST. (13-2). Said hearing to be held
V5'EI/NESDAY..IANUARY 27,1993 AT 7:00 P.M.,
ONE SALEM GREEN, second floor.
RICHARD A. BENCAL, Chairman
January 13. 20, 1993 SN 12669
CITY OF SALEM
BOARD OF APPEAL
745-9595 Ext. 381
Will hold a public hearing for all persons inter-
ested in the petition submitted by DEIULIS BROS.
CONST. CO. for Variances to allow construction
,of single family dwelling at MOONEY AND DUR- _
!KIN RDS. (R-1/RC. Said hearing to be held
(WEDNESDAY.JANUARY27,1993AT7:OOP.M.,
ONE SALEM GREEN, second floor.
RICHARD A. BENCAL, Chairman
January 13, 20, 1993 SN83509
CITY OF SALEM
BOARD OF APPEAL
745-9595 Ext. 381
Will hold a public hearing for all persons inter-
Iested in the petition submitted by ANTHONY J.
ROVENDRO for a Special Permit to extend the
height of the garage at 127 CANAL STREET(13-
4) to make a peak roof. Said hearing to be held
WEDNESDAY,JANUARY 27,1993 AT 7:00 P.M., -
ONE SALEM GREEN, second floor.
RICHARD A. BENCAL, Chairman
January 13, 20, 1993 SN12668
CITY OF SALEM
BOARD OF APPEAL
745-9595 Ext. 381
Will hold public hearing for all persons inter-
ested in the petition submitted by RITA&ROBT.
DESANTIS/F.J, LIVAS, JR. for variances from
lot area & front yard setback to allow property
to be divided at 65 BRIDGE/6 E. COLLINS/9
LATHROP STS.(B-4/R-2).Said hearing to be held
WEDNESDAY,JANUARY 27,1993 AT 7:00 P.M.,
D
ONE SALEM GREEN, second floor.
RICHARA. BENCAL, Chairman
January 13, 20, 1993 SN12670
CITY OF SALEM
BOARD OF APPEAL
745-9595 Ext. 381
Will hold a public hearing for all persons inter-
ested in the petition submitted by ROBT.
HARRINGTON, TR. for a Variance to allow con-
struction of a single family dwelling and garage
at 2 BERTUCCIO AVE. (R-p. Said hearing to be
held WEDNESDAY,JANUARY 27,1993 AT 7:00
P.M., ONE SALEM GREEN, second floor.
RICHARD A. BENCAL, Chairman
January 13, 20, 1993 SN83508