34-38 1/2 BRIDGE STREET - SPINALE, JOHN - ZBA (3) 34-38; BRIDGE ST. B-2 GI
- - -- - - - - ----_ -- ---- - . . V John.Spinale ,
o �
of Salem, 'lass djusetts
^v4 �3D2fIb D{ �1vPt11
VII ;
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF JOHN SPINALE, TRUSTEE FOR VARIANCES AND SPECIAL
PERMIT AT 34-38 1/2 BRIDGE STREET B-2
A hearing on this petition was held January 19, 1994 with the following
Board Members present: Francis Grealish, Chairman; Stephen Touchette,
George Ahmed, Albert Hill and Stephen O'Grady. Notice of the hearing was
sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly
published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts
General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioner, owner of the property, is requesting a Variance to allow
addition to be constructed as previously granted in a decision of the Board
of Appeal dated July 21, 1993. The City of Salem made changes to the plan
voted on and granted July 21, 1993 and eliminated some of the parking.
Petitioner is also requesting a Special Permit to allow the addition to be
used for auto repair and body shop and for storage, the property is located
in a B-2 district.
The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this
request for a Special Permit is section 5-3(j ) , which provides as follows:
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the
Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set
forth in Section 8-6 and 9-4, grant Special Permits for alterations and
reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and for changes, enlargement,
extension or expansion of nonconforming lots, land, structures, and uses,
provided, however, that such change, extension, enlargement or expansion
shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming
use to the neighborhood.
In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit
requests, guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted
upon a finding by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will
promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's
inhabitants.
The Variances which have been requested may be granted upon a finding of
the Board that:
A. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the
land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting
other lands, buildings or structures in the same district.
B. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would
involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner.
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF JOHN SPINALE, TR. FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AND
VARIANCE AT 34-38 1/2 BRIDGE STREET, SALEM
page two
C. Desirable relief may be granted without keseantjallo dgtr ent to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogati from the
intent of the district or the purpose of theG.Ofdindrrce.
G
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented,
and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact:
1. There was no opposition to the request.
2. The Plans as submitted were changed at the request of the Planning
Board, reducing the amount of parking spaces and adding landscaping.
3. The size of the addition has not changed.
4. The Board of Appeal felt the use could only be granted by a Variance
not a Special Permit has requested. The prior use granted, namely
retail and storage was allowed under Special Permit requests.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented
at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1. Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property
but not the district in general.
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Ordinance would involve
substantial hardship on the petitioner.
3. The Variance requested can be granted without substantial detriment to
the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the ordinance.
4. The Special Permit requested in not in harmony with the neighborhood or
with the zoning district the property is located in and will not promote
the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the city's
inhabitants.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted 4-1 (Mr. Hill opposed) to grant the
Variance requested and accept the plans as revised and approved by the City
of Salem Planning Board. All conditions of the previously granted petition
shall remain in effect and are listed below with the exception of condition
Ill & #6 which have changed as a result of the revised plans.
1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, codes
ordinances and regulations.
2. All construction shall be done per the revised plans and dimensions
submitted January 19, 1994.
3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Dept. relative to smoke and fire
safety shall be strictly adhered to.
r - _
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF JOHN SPINALE, TR. FOR A VARIANCE AND SPECIAL
PERMIT AT 34-38 1/2 BRIDGE STREET, SALEM
page three FEB o
3 10
4. Petitioners shall obtain a building permit prior �dlconstruction.
- ASS
5. A Certificate of Occupancy is to be obtained.
6. Parking is to be provided as per the plans submitted 1/19/94.
7. Exterior finishes of the proposed construction shall be in harmony with
the existing structure.
The Board of Appeal voted 3 - 2 against the motion to grant a Special
Permit to allow the addition to be used as an Auto body, repair and storage
facility. (Members O'Grady, Ahmed & Grealish voted in favor of the motion,
Members Hill and Touchette voted in opposition) The motion to grant having
failed to garner the required four (4) affirmative votes fails to carry and
the request for the Special Permit is denied.
Variance Granted and Special Permit Denied
January 19, 1994
I
e
Francis X. Grealish, Chairman
Board of Appeal
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY
CLERK
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of
MGL Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing
of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to MGL Chapter
40A, Section 11, the Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not
take effect until a copy of the decision, bearing the certification of the
City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that,
if such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is
recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of
the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of
Title.
Board of Appeal
(fitu of "rziem, &�Eanadjusetts
lgaarh of 'Au}�etil
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF JOHN SPINALE, TRUSTEE FOR VARIANCES AND SPECIAL
PERMIT AT 34-38 1/2 BRIDGE STREET (B-2)
A hearing on this petition was held January 19, 1994 with the following
Board Members present: Francis Grealish, Chairman; Stephen Touchette,
George Ahmed, Albert Hill and Stephen O'Grady. Notice of the hearing was
sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly
published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts
General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioner, owner of the property, is requesting a Variance to allow
addition to be constructed as previously granted in a decision of the Board
of Appeal dated July 21, 1993. The City of Salem made changes to the plan
voted on and granted July 21, 1993 and eliminated some of the parking.
Petitioner is also requesting a Special Permit to allow the addition to be
used for auto repair and body shop and for storage, the property is located
in a B-2 district.
The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this
request for a Special Permit is section 5-3(j ) , which provides as follows:
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the
Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set
forth in Section 8-6 and 9-4, grant Special Permits for alterations and
reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and for changes, enlargement,
extension or expansion of nonconforming lots, land, structures, and uses,
provided, however, that such change, extension, enlargement or expansion
shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming
use to the neighborhood.
In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit
requests, guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted
upon a finding by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will
promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's
inhabitants.
The Variances which have been requested may be granted upon a finding of
the Board that:
A. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the
land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting
other lands, buildings or structures in the same district.
B. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would
involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner.
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF JOHN SPINALE, TR. FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AND
VARIANCE AT 34-38 1/2 BRIDGE STREET, SALEM
page two
C. Desirable relief may be granted without kes8ant3a,l f ytr ent to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogatit from the
intent of the district or the purpose of theC Ordinance:.-
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented,
and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact:
1. There was no opposition to the request.
2. The Plans as submitted were changed at the request of the Planning
Board, reducing the amount of parking spaces and adding landscaping.
3. The size of the addition has not changed.
4. The Board of Appeal felt the use could only be granted by a Variance
not a Special Permit has requested. The prior use granted, namely
retail and storage was allowed under Special Permit requests.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented
at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1. Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property
but not the district in general.
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Ordinance would involve
substantial hardship on the petitioner.
3. The Variance requested can be granted without substantial detriment to
the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the ordinance.
4. The Special Permit requested in not in harmony with the neighborhood or
with the zoning district the property is located in and will not promote
the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the city's
inhabitants.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted 4-1 (PM. Hill opposed) to grant the
Variance requested and accept the plans as revised and approved by the City
of Salem Planning Board. All conditions of the previously granted petition
shall remain in effect and are listed below with the exception of condition
#2 & S6 which have changed as a result of the revised plans.
1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, codes
ordinances and regulations.
2. All construction shall be done per the revised plans and dimensions
submitted January 19, 1994.
3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Dept. relative to smoke and fire
safety shall be strictly adhered to.
r
0
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF JOHN SPINALE, TR. FOR A VARIANCE AND SPECIAL
PERMIT AT 34-38 1/2 BRIDGE STREET, SALEM
page three FEB i
3 10 rii 'cy
4. Petitioners shall obtain a building permit prior �a';construction.
5. A Certificate of Occupancy is to be obtained.
b. Parking is to be provided as per the plans submitted 1/19/94.
7. Exterior finishes of the proposed construction shall be in harmony with
the existing structure.
The Board of Appeal voted 3 - 2 against the motion to grant a Special
Permit to allow the addition to be used as an Auto body, repair and storage
facility. (Members O'Grady, Ahmed & Grealish voted in favor of the motion,
Members Hill and Touchette voted in opposition) The motion to grant having
failed to garner the required four (4) affirmative votes fails to carry and
the request for the Special Permit is denied.
Variance Granted and Special Permit Denied
January 19, 1994
i%
L J
Francis X. Grealish, Chairman
Board of Appeal
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY
CLERK
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of
MGL Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing
of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to MGL Chapter
40A, Section 11, the Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not
take effect until a copy of the decision, bearing the certification of the
City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that,
if such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is
recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of
the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of
Title.
Board of Appeal
I
Qlit� of :$Zdem, C�ttssadiusetts
M
�o ' �nttrd of ��ettl I,
February 15, 1994
YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT AS OF February 08, 1994 THE DECISION OF
THE BOARD OF APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK TO
GRANT THE PETITION OF JOHN SPINAL FOR A VARIANCES TO ALLOW ADDITION TO
TO BE CONSTRUCTED AS PREVIOUSLY GRANTED BY THE BOARD OF APPEAL ON
12/21/93. THE SALEM PLANNING BOARD MADE CHANGES TO THE PLAN WHICH
ELIMINATED SOME OF THE PARKING. THE BOARD AT THE SAME TIME DENIED MR.
SPINALE'S REQUEST FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT TO ALLOW THE ADDITION TO BE
USED AS AN AUTO REPAIR & BODY SHOP AND FOR STORAGE. THE PROPERTY IS
LOCATED AT 34-38 1/2 BRIDGE STREET AND IS ZONED B-2.
BOARD OF APPEAL
BRENDA M. SUMRALL
CLERK OF THE BOARD
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE
CITY CLERK.
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section
17, of MGL Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days after the
date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk.
Pursuant to MGL Chapter 40A. , Section 11, the Variance/Special Permit
granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision
bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed
i and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed,
that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex
Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or
is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of title.
Board of Appeal
f
DATE OF HEARI SG
?ETITIONER �s
LOCATION
:MOTION: TO GRANT � � �� SECOND
n
TO DENY SECOND
TO RE-HEAR SECOND
LEAVE TO WI RAW SECOND
� At t]U a- SECOND
POLL CALL PRESENT GRANT DENY WITHDRAW / R CONTINUE
STEPHEN O'GRADY /
GEORGE A. AHMED ✓
FRANCIS GREALISH
ALBERT C. HILL
STEPHEN TOUCHETTE
ASSOCIATE !EMBERS
NINAHEN
ART R LABRECOUE — 2 0
CONDITIONS:
/ ,,
i
J
3 /,ZZg
I� 01 11
T Ctg of �ziem, ttssttcl�usetts
�gottrd of Appeal
!amti�
August 04, 1993
YOU ARE HEREBY .NOTIFIED THAT AS OF THIS DATE THE DECISION OF THE -
BOARD OF APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK TO
GRANT THE PETITION OF 34-38 1/2 REALTY TRUST, JOHN SPINALE, TRUSTEE
FOR VARIANCES TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF AN ADDITION AT 34-38 1/2 BRIDGE
STREET.
,
BOARD OF APPEAL
BRENDA M. SMALL
CLERK OF THE BOARD
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE
CITY CLERK.
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section
17, of MGL Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days after the
date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk.
Pursuant to MGL Chapter 40A. , Section 11, the Variance/Special Permit
granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision
bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed
and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed,
that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex
Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or
is recorded and noted on the owners Certificate of title.
i
Board' of Appeal
01 kJ4-94.08:01:04.37339-LJAN
j L' gnges
-94.08;01:04.37339-LJAN
JJJJ CITY OF SALEM
BOARD OF APPEAL
745-9595 Ext. 381 +
Will hold a public hearing for all persons inter-
ested in the petition submitted by JOHN SPI- CITY OF SALEM
NALE, TR.for variances/Special Permit to allowBOARD OF APPEAL '
addition at 34-38 1/2 BRIDGE ST.(B-2)to be con- 745-9595 Ext. 381 1
structed as previously granted with the changes hold a public hearing for all persons inter- 1
made by the Planning Board. Said hearing to e, in the petition submitted b
held WEDNESDAY, , TR.for variances/Special by JOHN
aSPoW
P. ONE SALEhI GREEN,Ise second f1994. AT 6 n al 34 1/2-
FRANCIS X. GREALISH, JR., Chairman d as previousBRIDGE ST.(B-2)to be con-
January 5, 12, 1994 y the Planniny granted with the changes
SN37339 EDNESDAY g Board. Said hearing to be
NE SALEM GREENARy 19, 1994 AT 6
CIS X. GREALI second floor 5,9 2, 1994 SH, JR., Chmrman
SN37339
L
94.08:01:04.37339-LJAN
CITY OF SALEM
BOARD OF APPEAL
795-9595 Ext. 381
old a public hearing for al]persons inter-
n the petition submitted by JOHN SPI-
TR.for variances/Special Permit to allown al 34-38 1/2 BRIDGE ST.(B-2)to be con-
d as previously granted with the changesy the Planning Board. Said hearing to beEDNESDAY, JANUARY 19, 1994 AT 6NE SALEM GREEN, second Boor.RANCIS X. GREALISH, JR., Chairmany 5, 12, 1994 SN37339
APPEAL CASE NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ./. . . . .
fit of '5ai m, 'Mttssar4usetts /-/;g-'q
,r. Poarb of '4tettl
TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS:
The Undersigned represent that he is are the owners of a certain parcel of land located
at . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Street; Zoning District. .( -.Z.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : and said parcel is affected by Section(s) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
of the Massachusetts State Building Code.
Plans describing the work proposed, have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in
accordance with Section IX A. 1 of the Zoning Ordinance.
� o
M C) L
r�
�,to
cn z> N
C rri �
n�
r1n
rA
The Application for Permit was denied by the Inspector of Buildings for the f0,11ovt§,g
reasons:
The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem
Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to
approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said _
Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary
hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero-
gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for
the following reasons:
U ooh.
417iO,y1o�.,, �d I3e v
spa o J 01. S �,.,� �.. . . . .
W` ,� It "�. .._, .
CD o �- Owner. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
ca w cc
wAddress. . . .I`L . . . . . . . . . . .
Cr�
Z3Stepp �,
Petitioner. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .\.jf .
ijAddress. . . . ` k
Le, •. . . . . . .
Date. . 3 . . . . .
Telephone. . .59.'R7.I tJ . . . . . . . . . . .
By. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Three copies of the application must be filed with the Secretary of the Board of
Appeals with a check, for advertising in the amount of. . . . 1 �:.�.Q. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
four weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals. Check payable to The
Evening News.
NO....................................
PETITION TO BOARD OF APPEALS
LOCATION
.......................................:........................
PETITIONER..........................................
ADDRESS...............................................
. ................................................
CONDITIONS
..........................._....................................
........................ .......................................
................................................................
.................................................................
.................................................................
.................................................................
PETITION APPROVED.................... ❑
DENIED.........................
....................................... 19.........
i
Yoe
Aid
' eo °�° A43 seo s 62
�o0 39 ° egg 20 �'ee46' PARKIyG
moo Qs` STR v 4gRk/N s _
FFT ?ooS
L ` V° ,, b N
t ?,
t yORN Res�o�0 3 ao3o ??oo
Pq Rk�NG
/e_ `73R JAS `� 90 • ry PAF ZZe
RCF
ZS�o s''oo ' 9 33 w 7 ao '
may/ FT 23J °°sO sTR� 'e yO s s0 0 30 ° �
\ � -- � o ti^ tib
\ ~ M367
'OO 3p 6 y° ry�
O N 3 0O 2g93 'v ry ry
\ \\ \ a O �e ?q64
a /�� a 3po0 6
\ \\ \ `
as 7 O ,
C'
lee Ul/
Q
\ n
20 \
6 �ry N oo25030 y Wl
P� P, s?q
` to
a2 t33/
9 b e 1/60 \ o
'o oa tiry 0 N y k \yy ��I��pp w o �a
Is
'O/fib F C IlacLV3Af
X20 �-s q °p e ti m 5 \
C F 3 Q O 2 Zoo T t
'170
/90 y
ti /•QS 0 , H k I
26J ro "� 236
3 36
'St
t F
f t 300-e 23 9
.96 ti : M s ` PLANT „B °� 5,�
1i0 S /ie_ ?B`S6 43 so E R S r14 sn
T
/�9 �n921y i .My /'� i• qq 5e9 �2B �5 51,e5v 190
°e
l+ S I&I 250
8,9/n 24A
Rass 943 '6eo 4 'ST z 495?
0
�o�3g a FF�O ?geFs FAKING
k
o° l r��(y ?a e
'h0R ,° s0'e00 3 'to3S ��00 6,3 /
P4
A. t.2
3R J�^`S a Vy� /,;L •9O �e P/E/j tta �iI
5� cis °Qr S 'vss3 « seep aD ° J AV;f. c,
$ ^Mryohti°a°° G47E s0.
R w
0
BOSTON
0 3 e' / GAS COMPANY
\\ • \ C/ MfRR'C v F/ 64
6.2 AC
N -pO es AVf. v,/
\ a
\, n
coCV
W/
)i60 \ e
a v°hti O N+�
�r w,• �' b• '�G� F f Iq 3 ��E W �.
C f ° as O� O ' 2 ST,ROO
4
p g 234
6.6 AC. 3
/2.6 AC.F/ola
14 / A /9.6 AC.7o/4/
238
/4,636
23941
2 2
� (, 244 4
0
s / ^W •n� „ PLANTE �° o 4? 040 2974 4
q a els 7e❑ �. S.. T R
�)?r 10° �� y / ?. by 5T B 76 1253 e o E T a ea eJ n
T r�° o �o v 46 S Q Sz 292 4/0 I 2V .e
g X463 G51I 250 :2® Dni
A^n �!_ n 118,91n
APPEAL CASE NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
01it of ,S' ttlem, massac4usetto
TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS:
The Undersigned represent that he is are the owners of a certain parcel of land located
at NO. . . . V.4•• •6qp.5c si. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Street; Zoning District.$-?•
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . : and said parcel is affected by Section(s) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
of the Massachusetts State Building Code.
Plans describing the work proposed, have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in
accordance with Section IX A. 1 of the Zoning Ordinance.
Ae-0- 14pp��iL �� N
r,o s-
A
r T �
fn�
N
The Application for Permit was denied by the Inspector of Buildings for the following
reasons:
The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem
Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to
approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said
Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary
hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero-
gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for
the following reasons:
[; UgK� gw7
cc S pe "A �e.cw.�� � 4o ^"-ow ?&e �%oust7
-1i1�Ge� A-og,iel tiez,J -�u -3�
Owner. . . �o�!.r. .SP;"'r\C . . .
y� W
ca Address. . `f ' 3�. . .� . . . . . . . . . .
C.) � Telephone. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Petitioner. . S E�pl.e,,,� p love� y
Address. . . . .1`{ $ tor. ! . . . .
bate. . . '�. � Zy .I. Telephone. . . . �`f 2?y . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
By. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Three copies of the application must be filed with the Secretary of the Board of
Appeals with a check, for advertising in the amount of. . .0.9'3 4. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
four weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals. Check payable to The
Evening News.
�
�
�
~
`
N0---, ......................
PETITION T0BOARD 0FAPPEALS �
L0C&l{0N �
�
--`----`---`--------^-
�
PETITIONER..........................................
ADDRESS.............................................. ^
�
---`------------
�
'
�
�
t0NCUTl0NS �
�
^
�
--`'-`~`---^---------`-
~
-,`.-~,'`I ....................................... �
~~^^'------------`^-^--
'
`
.^^^^^--------------.,,,^
,~~~_'__'`~',`_________. �
, .
-^^-~^^~^`~~----------- ^
7~l �
PETITION APPROVED....................
�~� ,
DEN[ED--------. �~1
/
-.................................... .......... |9......... '
. �
.^
��� '
APPEAL CASE NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Ctu of 5ttiPm, 'Mttssar4usetts
�.,. Puttrb of '�"ettl
TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS:
The Undersigned represent that he is are the owners of a certain parcel of land located
at NO. . .3 H-.3$ `17— . (�vl.•70t . 5:t. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Street; Zoning District. a^ 2
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : and said parcel is affected by Section(s ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
of the Massachusetts State Building Code.
Plans describing the work proposed, have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in
accordance with Section IX A. 1 of the Zoning Ordinance.
o
(J�YLecj a-ppcgC - s
- N
#.n
F
N tC
The Application for Permit was denied by the Inspector of Buildings for the following
reasons:
The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem
Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to
approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said
Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary
hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero-
gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for
the following reasons:
4 0 r i J�v..., J- C> V%" V S C D o.t A..t y., V"�0 �•. �C'. /te�p o f rt a..,,p 9 0 0 y
^owner. .
Telephone. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Petitioner. . P. , l o.�e\�•r . .
Address. . . �Lt SiAk.. . . Sk . . .SA (e.n. . . . . .
Date. . . . �� �.�.y. . �.�1.3 . . . . Telephone.A. .�oft.-.7`i.S. -.�.?-?.`1. . . . . . . . .
By. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Three copies of the application must be filed with the Secretary of the Board of
Appeals with a check, for advertising in the amount of. . . .rM; .q?. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
four weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals. Check payable to The
Evening News.
2 `v Ile
ti�
l n B a1.y 943 '6m0 is ry _ n62
o I ,, 04/ h•• � '6 oe 4� rR ff cPs�
apo 39 a 4F�p ?a+p g6 RKING
60o S • 'O4 r P P
gunPq-iyG .
ti!
45,
a of r apo S
s►
1TM =yoRN = a 3poo 3 '060 ��� • 63
q�,� vo , 0/ •c ��o « Pq NK/ 26.40 ;
9r•�'• va � • V NG 4
O Sag W
mp ^• \ PIfR zza wl
Lr-S J9p� a 479 32 (`e
8 Z 62g
-251° > ao e
°60 a 4V f
G4TE
\ � � M367
o
lO00
GA
leo rae 4 VE
Ar 47
a 20 4v
N, \\ NI
�a
n / 23\
R 3
`i
S T Q/
23 zab
N qpm e., N n % 0
Vo �/ aO St ° eo^�w, m P 4 bej
K
h � 0 , R / N
/90 h 3T ,238 234
seg 6.B 4C.
"' fii6 • e 3 56 /2.640 F/c
ey° /9.6 4C.lot
238
f �° 8656
'°
a °_a te3o 40 241
6
o9 � a PLANTERS a 4� 0 2,97
5g ao
❑ e ®��a. 1 9 AJn / _• g. 6 76 5,253 f 2 �.
40� Q sz as2 7550 N 24E
8's, 240 �1
BOARD OF ASSESSORS •
CITY HALL PAGE.
GA6E.'�M,—,,,MA7-,,O-1-9,7O—
V,
b ,,I;,-�11777777 V4 V
IVz M,
rt, VV 't's
i,
*VV,
,4,
T' IV,
.W k f assV V V I,,V V �,V 1,1eat 9-OCURTIF;aa -JED" ABUT7TERS"VLIS IV V,V, V,�I,
V XV V,- Z � k �V 1,�, , ,� �,j 3
>;a..
4 SUBJECT PROPERTY: PIAP. 37 LOT: 0021 SUFF. 51
5 PROPERTY ADDRESS: 0034 BRIDGE STREET'
-SPINALG� -IN-D t,,
I IV I V I
O�
"e", ;I'i IV IV%iI �i
9
eaaV aaaaa V, I,
aa"
10 seas 12
A X &`04 W F F-` IR-T-Y-ADDR .6 .. . . ... L�IL' Ali�lhfi;..ADDRES-S 2
!4
5
Oil 37 0021 OC)34 BRIDGE STREET- THI RTY FOUR-38 1/2 BRIDGE ST RLY TR 11 HIGH STREET L
12 P- 9,7n 16
-SAL-.&M-MA-79'
13 V, V V,V.*V V -,I� -V V 7
Vim ST RLY,VjTR, =IUS Av
R I .. .. ..
V, Z 7-11 1 CO( OP-11
V,V K,,",�VV�V V
14a,aa . ....
,SEtaga
eis
ICHIV
TR
IV �'V VV,� �,;,V ,VV IV
15 al" 29 RR 9;9 R, -R T- }.Rs , ,y
2
--qRf 4", V�, 4 aha IV<
16 -5:PL�e
- 1NGEMI ARTHUR P TR SALEM MA 01970
17
— 37 0023 0013 THORNDIKE STREET PETRINGA JOSEPH R 13 rHORNDIKE ST
A
.... ......L4-W,44
aaa»V V R� 1,K E
r, t:�, MOF
V"''V.I.. 00 1......IV I I - I ��E "kPg "',��V,��
1,G U 6 31, 7u)
V 1,V�I V, V, V VI 4X V� x
0 �,00 --4
a ®a
IV 4
I,VI IWO—
m
V,.i,iV 4, a. -,M"�1k
-5�ee,2
BARBARA A SALEM MA 01970
--3 36 0186 0020 MARCH STREET SAL.[-..M CITY OF
VI V,
m
RIICE,, '-"
a way, 3
�V 41 �A, IV IV X A VI IV§,,4 Ig III,
WV"* as
IV
14,
N
SALEMIMA
V,V A"' 't V V IVx. V�V EL21 TAME V*, ,b, rt I,,�ffii,jii z IiP:a m
7ry 1-1111iW11-aaaa
as � �� ` roe
c� IV -f-qV-
roaar.rouSAL.Ell MA 01970
36 0201 0016 RICE STREET MASSERO FRANCIS J 16 RICE ST ✓
0 >
LEPI-MA-W-q7e-
7
ILL,
V AG E.;, P Q ST, R 0 A'D V-,,
I ," ,,'n II
X
%,�V V, ,V V,�
V
i; as ya1114,
IV IV I' V V,,
v; as- Aa as gS �,anaEaffi•"
.00 IR -_SZk
_1_4_rg ___t_Cex r
:6Ib AN
4 SALEM MA 0-1970
-5 36- 0204 0012 RICE STREET CARR JAIIES JOSEPH JR ET ALI 12 RICE S7
SALEW-PIA,919 a �ffi�
I
7 V,,,'I", IV
0010 RICE S T RF E.7, V' YR,J(A-IN 'H- V !b!J4'ICEV'ti( ,
'a.
SAI)VEm IV mA,�6 i
14 Z V,VIII
"i x V 2, V,V V, I E ATR-1,
IV V1.V I — *, 4 V,, VV P- V, 9 A
�V V III�V V,V V V,,4 1� ci V i I. s vIi,,a 4,i @I V 5
'V VV"�, "I,&� ,1�.-I� I I ! ! I I I
Sj F, R dF�STZ
0 DAILEY ELAINE L SALEM MA 01970 40
1 36 02.207 0006 RICE STREET MCCARTHY JOHN G 6 RICE ST
2 SXALEa-PIA-a1,220
16' 0*--'08 .0004 R I CE STI (ENZIE-ILVILLIA1
Vo .,e
V-1
A; IV ,.V.
SALEM MA 01970 61
36 0210 0040 BRIDGE STREET PILGRIM M07EL INC 40 BRIDGE STREET
8
VI
9 V 4 V,j
E �BRI Fi)GE�STREET #IsW LVEMTERPRISES k.:AETY,'sTIR
V
VV �V*V P,, ,'aafaaa. as NL aw VV,III'?,V V
W�V
IV I,V"
KV?,V,
-3 7 1
4
1711 ,
Vsx
K4,C
xIV,VV,, ffi II,,V,
IV, V,�V,
sat VV V1,11
VV�,V ,�,k� I, ,,, I� ,1, 11. " , 7 1 1,�,V�,,� 71
aaa 'o IV
�AVg V V &V V s 9� V, •
V,X"I VV,V,V V�, &IIi" � ,
IV I V&q V V,",V`&,VV, I,%I`V, IV 44
�V 0�,� V V V,4VI, IV 0 V, V v",*,4
VVII
In, *IA VOW',V �V 'KIVV VI,,V
Z, 7
I, 'S V,.....
BOARD OF ASSESSORS
CITY HALL PAGE.
770-1-970"'-
�R& 9 111 W
DA
,....LATE
�7:
11'�F!f�E D,� Rc:��,A'�TSTTC,,,P W, P, f
4 5
SUBJECT PROPERTY: MAP. 37 LOT: 0021 SUFF.
PROPERTY ADDRESS: 0034 BRIDGE STREET
7
�,T, R
am �,S PZ N A UE, 'd F I�i 4ma ,3,
�,,x�,
9
P'RO'PERTY–NDTMESS
T" I 13
14
GIANELLI MICHAEL 6 FAIRVIEW RE) Ls
12 36 0232 001-33 BRIDGE STREET 16
13 14.a . :,�;z :
d$mar 777-777,, "A 7
EM'Gl.�,AN,V M(WE,R,,�,C,Qpi'i,
�oof)�i -FERRY 0TREEYT, "4� CH
EJ,
14 ��PROPE j, 4
16 21
le —
17 •
is
9 �T
w��,�,�i, F 7 7777�T7�,7
V,� t
:0
ma a@m
x wm*vi"","„amax
4 4 0�4 Ma P,
"V &�x 4
V
& ,ed edx.w.': sdmm:-sa-a 'ea»Rm�.' m•'s"Soso aaa ansa:.a„ .«<m, g, q$g,r:a saa as.a
:2
-3
51
oz 0 4
wm
,"X
7
--7-77=77
2 2
""4", V*g V,
3 �,x
zl��A
3
4
5
7
da,4,
0,il
I I I I �i, e .1
•
41 r
W �,A T ",W 11, 11 'x,0,%
•
2
3 1 5 1
4 V 'K, 7777, dM V �,q g 4 x
rk 1, w"
44 *' a sam %
wss t Xa, A
45
46 61
;7 •
48
9 X'.
0
VV n",
11.0
71
4
s 3
cX, PE TER
o ASSF-1131�
S V 43 ` 0 4 Y 62
o p .s 9 +o RF mss
p sed t 9133
`oo �9 WFg?o ?gp�b' PARKING
Oo �` StR v FA„ k/NGV -
4'B
ORNO
U
e /.
atio
� s �oo0 3 s06o X200 63
? ' Pq R ?sqC, 2
G
^— J as ' �a 2gs ,03/ s 9F \ry N w
soo `weg�O o �' !'/ERCE zZe
0
8 z sof
\ 26� / osa ee` S = rps3 /beO 3p e e AVE
TRFF17, 8 rvry gj 3 ^Mrypory �pOJp GATE g O W
Q
\` M36-L 2 O BOO
'3`000 os
0
W
O
4 \
\`• / �. \ �� �?�2 n ry � ,9 7 ? •9,j ry ry y /
U ? 6 ry
N �, yo 664 / BOSTON
ry ' 0 e e / GAS COMPANY
Af z/
R �
R!c 64
l • ?/ Q �l
8.2 AC
�y 20 ,ea AVE,
20
03 c)
0 P
n � �
NN +r \
p
/8e ,e '7• `s 'h` � FERRY e e ' „d`;3 \ _At E�GCq
D,po
ao 3 ti ^
C a o ZOO T, ���C/N
F `Ql' � � e
a 3
ell vp
y ry -cob) ry 8o s e° Mb : n m P4 R
/ 0 k ! N
/
/e9 �,. zZ o
',?ss /90 ro�"� ti� 236 �' 234
6.B AC Cy, �
Q1 ///6 ' 56 /2.6 AC. F/ota
'y:
/9.6 AC. roto/
p 238
0
S t / / /4i 656
�"� B.. � e ,�_ 239 � 241 2 4
,9 / . = s 2.8 0 40 244 4
6 / h � ^ > a s ° PLANT � � .?,� 0 2,974.
/j8 1i0 / 5 ?e56 °3 so 78 E R S ' " S R E r 4Q7 X44 9 0 ,4
2�1y 15 a 5298 3000 253 e T E T
7°9 nay lj�a 2 bb j 75 5,/25 +" z°
190. e n 3� ` ° ? .10 250 N 246 re
ry
I B,9/n 24a /_-Ns
F- 2, �U% IN '~55 - 1�, HW� •�
At'PfZd�C. }CAT! £ .F. _<� . I p E 1z -
3, LLO4A �c ,` RUILr7; N, Gov uA4f-
� C. / ' ---
� I'7 2O 7 X 0. 25 %
r - j�n•3 l I -- - } 4, fXU�Tjr-+ SUILr>tN65 l"4 ✓ r-1 '. 1165 + 1196 = Z�? IS,'s
(�{r �/ ,<�,._ �J t� �,}�}_` `I •'; 230 5 �� + 2z�00 5:F - � lel rj 5
COIRL R. L;}�','. .` i / ?,Na \ k�,i., yx b7'y r �. / /��IC /rr 1���/�L f� lN�. Pi�tZK �N� JPAc� J 14
It
r _ ;�'' `•` ( � �t `Jena, ,
1040. 0' _
--
:i �V�i LILY POLI; ..
N /8 Z vO E tiL� rtC 1# T
o g. 00
;'. � - -- �T 12.1 n,l _
f 7. Pr?-oP6rz7Y 5ut3J1=CT 6 r� y
'x2 � �o o` ! 4n'.:: • I
TU FA .�,t�?Er.1 , a �F
SUCe`c NEo f g. F -Ir:� ld`•��j 112 Efr)
' `4 ENcLOSdRd fFiJcE �-r�
?1ZOP05ED mew AP (71rl-off - �
ti W� loucso y"arc r y _
� t
y ,
\ 28- 0 X GO' O
•, �, ,, �, ♦ \\ I (o3� 2� o x 40'0" � �„
GONC 2G. E cEL O - .
ti WH Sr PS
yIt
}
D 41
0i \ 0
N
00 , 0 P
# �. EXIST( ?�IC, f3UlLD1N � Z p , Qj
R ETA I L 84v 5.f �o
4w 0
`' `3 ,3 of / �� 7 1 14'Q l7 _�• i �, r L� V rn
T yr
o
N
i 40 1 9 1 �� 3 ,4 51��
! 401 i 7 r i 3 W E
"1
NOTE EN1E,Z '4 EXIf s/SNS ' r J'1-14)
W `�
M O SJRfA cs 4 NOIZW /4Y /�'�AVL9S i '25 6U0{JYMA`> ALAT05 - HFPSif FOrC.N/N�. SH2,,,�5 W Q 0 0
_ 00
• 't 1 j i I !oA/a C4'l2.lJ: � t• . , 3'O �4l/0� CA✓1df24>E CvR89 � `y
_ ,--_: _= 13Hv1 fi Jy STiY�V �_ r Q1JP LIl� r a
` — tP�Nr, p
PRJ P L; f MHA L Poi` 1 4;lr , <� ! � .r
11, 1 /N�. •J,Of n//IIN• ' r • ♦ 'S .,,.CanL ISL.YV+1L / Q Q a
_ �'. vdB KJ'i ,.¢N�.',7,.-14 7 � _ '//L/1,.lI rE QV ®,N /f 'i. ♦ .__ -- _ - - — _. __ - .. . }/ .
Y �
NOr,-: CdRd NT _I stn% -
r 10 � i�� 74 O r (d I
F-1 9�! .{f..._..
c,/R9..w, � .at � E
12=�4 b rN�,..,ovr.x nuc:»„ Lxz � !/ �C �L H V / 7` ? C)
B / Dry UC lPV40L jc- YaKlAJ3LX Wionr� S T le E E T �T�,xN� 3 1. A IV
REVISIONS
zo 9�D
�{ q ,�
PkoN6l� rr air --
JG! ( N D.' 6 PIAIA L F N "Ell'-) I r� DATE a . 4 19 5
II 1 rag - 38i�J 6,ren2 ,r Sr. giF4LTy 7x,V6r)
A, vG. 4 1993
c zr —i6 z4 32
F20M A FLLI" c5�r P•11RAL LANG 60kvf;-r5
R)rze.)e= PLAY � pANVEnS, Ivtd•
FD'wg,. No. p-