121,123 BOSTON STREET - TACHE, NORMAN & ANNETTE - ZBA 121 & 123 Boston St. B-2
Norman & Thomas Tache
U
9-
4
i � ^
z�ry
���Y
1
z ,
O N
13
w sr
sp N
H
0
O 0 O
m
co
w 0
H.
n ct
m
w
N
l
flti#g ofttlem, � ttssttcl#use##s
ti
�. : ;3 t
`;,, � •' �BnttrD of �t�{renl '
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF NORMAN & THOMAS TACHE FOR .
VARIANCE FOR 121 & 123 BOSTON ST. �/
A hearing on this petition was held April 30, 1986 wiK&rthpe fa rowTNg°pard Members
present: James Hacker, Chairman, Messrs. , Charnas, Luzinski, Strout and Associate
Member Dore. Notice of the hearing was sent to abuttlAt"and others and notices
of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Ptvgping,News in accordance with
�I;assachusetts General Laws Chapter- 40A.
LL = o petitioners, owners of the property, are requesting Variances from any and all
< _ y
applicable density and setback requirements in order to divide property into two
LL
acts Property is located in a B-2 district.
lriance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding of the Board
o m
>` 7 o 1 . special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect
the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally
LL E m o w affecting other lands, buildings and structures in the same district;
x Z C G C y
2. literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would in-
volve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to petitioner; and
3. desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent- of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
U W N p W
] LLN W H y C
� G f Q
= o J � - ,v pe Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the
s < z u L fearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact:
H C J U < C
J
Z w ~ U
_ - �� �_ 1 . There was no opposition;
= Z y U - y C
N N u U 2 N
- - 2. Petitioner has failed to show sufficient facts for this Board to find
that substantial hardship would result from the denial of this request
y = o 2for a Variance.
LL L C W W
the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the
hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1 . Petitioner has not met his burden of proof as regards to legal hardship.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted 4-1 (Mr. Strout voted in favor) against
granting the Variance requests.
DENIED
c
Peter Strout, Member Board of Appeal
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK
APPEAL CASE NO. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
".,;i.<c.az.�_ - ✓ iii
c� C�rtg of '5§alPm,
ti
`' i`s �attrD fff C&"ettl
S
TO T}iE BOARD Of APPEALS:
The Undersigned represent that he is are the owners .of a certain parcel of land lo c ted
at NO. . . . ✓. a/. .�t./.W3. ,� d---r17 . . • • • • • • . . . .Street; Zoning District.W
and said parcel is affected by Secti.on(s). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
of the Massachusetts State Building Code.
Plans describing the work proposed, have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in
accordance with Section IX A. 1 of the Zoning Ordinance.
d
LIJ 1:
y..,_
The Appiicatie`Fr=for"P'ermit was denied by the Inspector of Buildings for the followinc
reasons. -
The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem
Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to
approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said
Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary
hardship to the Undersigned and relief -may be granted without substantially dero-
gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for
the following reasons:
Own erl&ll'i°rlft.!
. . . . . . .�/. f. . �-
Address. . . ./4. . ��� + GeAs/Ty.
TeIephone. .7, 4 �� ✓` 7y1 s ��l . . .
Petitioner. . . . 4 z��.y.. . . . . • • . • • • • •
Address. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. �°va�. . ./P/• . . . . .
Date. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Telephone. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Three copies of the application must be filed with the Secretary of the Board of
Appeals with a check, for advertising in the amount of. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . ... . . . . .
four weeks prior to the meeting of 'the Board of Appeals. Check payable to The
Evening News.
NO....................................
PETITION TO BOARD OF APPEALS
LOCATION
................................................................
PETITIONER..........................................
ADDRESS...............................................
..............................................
CONDITIONS
.................................................................
........................... ....................................
................................................................
.................................................................
.................................................................
....................................... ....................
PETITION APPROVED.................... ❑
DENIED......................... n
19.........
ofttlPm, � ttssttcl#use##s
� s Pnurb of ckppral
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF NORMAN & THOMAS TACHE FOR j
VARIANCE FOR 121 & 123 BOSTON ST. 2
A hearing on this petition was held April 30, 1986 wi&Ythpe f2llbwRhg'Kard Members
present: James Hacker, Chairman, Messrs. , Charnas, Luzinski, Strout and Associate
Member Dore. Notice of the hearing was sent to abuttFAt"and others and notices
of the hearing were 'properly published in the Salemi.gg,News in accordance with
glassachusetts General Laws Chapter• 40A. gP "`` `�
c, �?etitioners, owners of the property, are requesting Variances from any and all
w o LLapplitable density and setback requirements in order to divide property into two
W _ aots aProperty is located in a B-2 district.
Ariance 'which has been requested may be granted upon a finding of the Board
E PtFat
1 . special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect
w the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally
m o ffi affecting other lands, buildings and structures in the same district;
' _ 2. literal enforcement of theP rovisions of the ZoningO Ordinance would in-
2 U W U ~ N 3
y ¢ a o o volve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to petitioner; and
3. desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the
r public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
o ¢- LL o W - W intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
s ¢ ¢ p
SlEe Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the
i a z g � Ri® aring, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact:
a> ¢ o
yy !9 .1 . There was no opposition;
H Z J 2 N
J
a V37' w = y 2. Petitioner has failed to show sufficient facts for this Board to find o W z o
- o o that substantial hardship would result from the denial of this request
J O Z W O
G Z C W U C C W for a Variance.
W LL
LL ' o R the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the
hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1 . Petitioner has not met his burden of proof as regards to legal hardship.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted 4-1 (Mr. Strout voted in favor) against
granting the Variance requests.
DENIED �j a>
Peter Strout, Member Board of Appeal
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK
DATE OF HEARING
PETITIONER-�92 {Iii� 'V.�J//fJJuy N
LOCATION
MOTION: TO GRANT SECONDED
TO DENY SECONDED
LEAVE TO WITHDRAW SECONDED
CONTINUE SECONDED
ROLL CALL ABSENT PRESENT GRANT DENY WITHDRAW CONTINUE
RICHARD BENCAL
SCOTT CHARNAS
JAMES HACKER ✓
EDWARD LUZINSKI /
;PETER STROUT .
ASSOCIATE MEMBERS
PETER DORE /
6
ARTHUR LABRECQUE `
DISCUSSION & CONDITIONS:
I
i
Citof alem, nssuchusetts
Poarb of �pprA
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF NORMAN & THOMAS TACHE FOR
VARIANCE FOR 121 & 123 BOSTON ST.
A hearing on this petition was held April 30, 1986 wirthpe fRlItRaFg/pard Members
present: James Hacker, Chairman, Messrs. , Charnas, Luzinski, Strout and Associate
Member Dore. Notice of the hearing was sent to abuteAP*and others and notices
of the hearing were properly published in the Salem E�.gpiAg,News in accordance with
vMassachusetts General Laws Chapter• 40A.
C7 G
petitioners, owners of the property, are requesting Variances from any and all
applicable density and setback requirements in order to divide property into two
` ots.�Property is located in a B-2 district.
W C a G o `fiYie Variance which has been reouested may be granted upon a finding of the Board
W � �
.� �:tbat
C C N G N Z W m
h > W E = < 1 . special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect
o _ x 'm the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally
ry LL m o W affecting other lands, buildings and structures in the same district;
~ Z U
N
iff '. literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would in- '
\~.. � ~ Qz c.
H < 5 a o volve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to petitioner; and
3. desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
0
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
Sje Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the
i < z W 4 searing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact:
tih
1 . There was no . opposition;
U -
U O N Z W E A N
y r y'z o 12. Petitioner has failed to show sufficient facts for this Board to find
5 = LL o that substantial hardship would result from the denial of this request
for a Variance.
SOfl the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the
hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1 . Petitioner has not met his burden of proof as regards to legal hardship.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted 4-1 (Mr. Strout voted in favor) against
granting the Variance requests.
DENIED
Peter Strout, Member Board of Appeal
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED-WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK
Y
S
ofttlem, ttssttcfju$efts
•�Rrrl•InT,wT '
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF NORMAN & THOMAS TACHE FOR .
VARIANCE FOR 121 & 123 BOSTON ST.
A hearing on this petition was held April 30, 1986 wi&rthe fal)5WIft' "pard Members
present: James Hacker, Chairman, Messrs. , Charnas, Luzinski, Strout and Associate
Member Dore. Notice of the hearing was sent to abuttF { . 'tand others and notices
of the hearing were 'properly published in the Salem Fwgping,News in accordance with
Tassachusetts General Laws Chapter- 40A.
H s
4
6 . petitioners, owners of the property, are requesting Variances from any and all
'appliLable density and setback requirements in order to divide
property into two
3T = wdotsaaProperty
is located in a B-2 district.
< � "Lpe }J�riance 'which has been requested may be granted upon a finding of the Board
o = -tEat
C `
H ` ' S 1 . special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect
> U G
oW 2 U the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally
LL m o W affecting other lands, buildings and structures in the same district;
r Z U
2. literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would in-
+ "
5 H a W Q o o volve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to petitioner; and
= W 3. desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
WW
LL o W = intent- of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
W Ci W N O W 2
= 4 G
0 5 � � J ffEe Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the
W w Ri®aring, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact:
E 1 . There was no opposition;
s LL = ti 2. Petitioner has failed to show sufficient facts for this Board to find
s w that substantial hardship would result from the denial of this request
for a Variance.
W
the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the
hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1 . Petitioner has not .met his burden of proof as regards to legal hardship.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted 4-1 (Mr. Strout voted in favor) against
granting the Variance requests.
DENIED
Peter Strout, Member Board of Appeal
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK
F0423
ew Salem tache 02 5 e ( C297 leg ew Salem tache 02 5 e
I 04 23 86
CITY OF SALEM 111 CITY OF SALEM
BOARD OF APPEAL
745F A BOARD OF APPEAL
for all persons in' 145.0215 arsons in-
blic hearing by Normau ublic hearing for all persons
Will hold a Pu PI submittedand/or Will hold a P
m the P Variance the Petition submitted n
c
terested Tache for s licable den- terested in a Varia a an
dor
and Thomas and all aPP Tache forand all apPllcable den-
it from any divide prop at and Thomas ro ertY at
Special Perm order to Said hear., Special Permit from oder to divide P ?
city and setbacks fn Aril 30. 1986 at 7:00
1986 at 7:00 ! sity and setbacks in A rfl 30
2 mto two lots.Said t
121&123 Boston St. esd into two lots.
in8 to be held WednesdaY� P 121&123 Boston 5t.lB day. p
Green,2nd floor. Chairman ing to be held Wed° 2nd floor.
P M..One Salem HACKER, r Green, HACKER,Chairman
JAMES B. Ply„One Salem AIdES B.
April 16,.31198S
April 16,23,1986
4� BOARD OF ASSESSORS
93 WASHINGTON STREET, CITY HALL, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 (617) 744-0660
sRe,���10 x ABUTTERS
MARCH 28, 1986
TO: 123 BOSTON ST: ASSESSED OWNER: NATT REALTY TRUST MAP 16 LOT 123
TACHE N.C. ETALI TRS
MAP LOT LOCATION ASSESSED OWNER MAILING ADDRESS
16 125 129 BOSTON ST BIANCHI REALTY TRUST 87 KEAYNE ST
JOSEPHINE E. BIANCHIITR REVERE, MA 02151
16 124, 125 BOSTON ST FLORA M. O'NEIL ' SAME AS LOCATION
16 136 119 BOSTON ST SOTIRIOS KORISIANOS & 252 WASHINGTON ST
THEOKLITOS KORISIANOS / PEABODY, MA 01960
16 152 118 BOSTON ST PHILIP J. MCSWIGGIN / SAME AS LOCATION
16 153 120 BOSTON ST LEONARD DWYER &
ARLENE DWYER /
16 154 122 BOSTON ST GILBERT & MARY ANN LUMBARD ✓ 8 VINE ST
GLOUCESTER, MA 01930
16 119 38 BUTLER ST ALBERT & YVONNE B OU DREAULT !/ SAME AS LOCATION
16 120 36 BUTLER ST PETER COPELAS ✓ 135 BOSTON ST
/ SALEM, MA 01970
16 121 2 PROSPECT AVE GERARD L'HEUREUX ✓ / SAME AS LOCATION
16 122 30 BUTLER ST EDWARD & CLAIRE YOUNG / "
s/ +o�,'h��
s o f 6 F Cs(9 js2 %/6 s aRF So�Fo o
}Y
QUO ° JJi? 3J '=v •S v ? / '
.:3./v/ n /J//.3 �`r> 53 OHO /S /S `'•S:', E�/yp ��
%syn
7�
o Jp 0
t
•Sq�2 2S0O /Op
' av R / ..
—19
ar
961 1 aoso
�// /6s�> 4/6 ?/8 ✓' / v � F F T
6 2 y l 3gO 'SJ
va 6- ti F9 O
6t O O
/ t
p vJ Yp i a9 / N Ea /
v / 2j / p
s/64
v �s 222 C9 /3 /ryD
Co
�00
0o i3�28 /O0 ,
CO
b
/ Ps,�FB �\ q 'p >s 6�TC � X02 ti1ti ppu
161
Al
vu
6 � T 4
��v o°O w :r `p �zV y22, y s/9e 'K' /9gj° <lb
s Z
/ CU
s
;-T/pp 3;-
1>
o
N/ocl;)
O/ a�a'/804o Sq
89 eo
2223
S
6 00o9
/ ss8S 3222s
A,
>^ 6g6S s 203 " G/ s�e3 /8q zy. /2�
O
oY
3 w
OLTAU of "ittlem, C assuchuse#ts
'J,SRec . ire department �eaDyuarfcrs
48 ':ir Vvtfe �%lreet
Joseph F. Sullivan o tt1em, tt. 01970
Chief
Date: April 29, 1986
City of Salem RE: 121 & 123 Boston Street
Board of Appeal Norman & Thomas Tache
One Salem Green
Salem, MA 01970
Sirs:
As a result of the notice received concerning the Board of Appeal hearing for
the above listed name and address, the Salem Fire' Department requests' the
following items to be placed on record:
The Salem Fire Department has no objection to the granting of a Variance and/or
Special Permit for the above listed property. Both dwell ings,.areccurrentlyiin
compliance relative to the installation of automatic smoke detectors.
spectfully, '
Norman P. LaPointe
Fire Inspector
cc: Appellant
Building Inspector
File
Form #105
IAPPEAL CASE NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
: A
Gi#u of '-3a1em, C �s z z�efts
Gj. IIttrb of �Ayprzd
TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS:
The Undersigned represent that he is are the owners .of a certain parcel of land located
at NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .Street; Zoning District.-0:41?
. . . . . . . .`. . . . . . . . ; and said parcel is affected by Section(s). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
of the Massachusetts State Building Code.
Plans describing the work proposed, have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in
accordance with Section IX A. 1 of the Zoning Ordinance.
IJ'1
Q- a__ N-
The ApF4icati&";F=Ffor'Permit was denied by the Inspector of Buildings for the followinc
reasons:
The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem
Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to
approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said
Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary
hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero-
gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for
the following reasons:
Owner. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Address. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Telephone. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Petitioner. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Address. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Date. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . Telephone. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
By. . , 1!. -c-. .�d. . . T ...
Three copies of the application must be filed with the Secretary of the Board of
Appeals with a check, for advertising in the amount of. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . ... . . . . .
four weeks prior to the meeting of 'the Board of Appeals. Check payable to The
Evening News.
i
NO....................................
PETITION TO BOARD OF APPEALS
LOCATION
................................................................
PETITIONER..........................................
ADDRESS...............................................
................................................
CONDITIONS
.................................................................
•
.............................................................
....................................................... ........
........................... .....................................
.................................................................
....................................... ....................
PETITION APPROVED....................
❑
DENIED.........................
19.........
APPEAL CASE NO. . . . . . . . . . . . I
9
Gita of uiem, Cffl ;n4uedt5
t.
TO THE BOARD .OF APPEALS:
The Undersigned represent that he is are the owners .of a certain parcel of land loca ed
at NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Street; Zoning District. .
. . . . :.. . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ; and said parcel is affected by Section(s) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
of the Massachusetts State Building Code.
Plans describing the work proposed, have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in
accordance with Section IX A. 1 of the Zoning Ordinance.
The Application for Permit was denied by the 'Inspector of Buildings for the followinc
reasons:
The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem
Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to
approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said
Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary
hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero-
gating . from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for
the following reasons:
Owner. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .
Address. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Telephone. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Petitioner. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Address. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . .
Date. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Telephone. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
By. .�O.-?- r >. . .5t. . . . . . . .�
Three copies of the application must be filed with the Secretary of the Board of
amount of. . . . . . • • • • •
'n the amou • . • • • • •• • •
'sin i • • •
o adverts
Appeals with a check, for 9
four weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals. Check payable to The
NO....................................
PETITION TO BOARD OF APPEALS
LOCATION
................................................................
PETITIONER..........................................
:�DURESS..........................
CONDITIONS
..................................................................
..............................................................
.................................................................
PETITION APPROVED.................... ❑
D ENI E1).........................
........... 19.........
1
Jr
�o✓
BUTLER STREET APPROVAL UNDER SUBDIVISION
CONTROL LAW NOT REQUIRED
gsOTeN JT
SALEM PLANNING BOARD
A OT
III a
Lo
LOCUS MAP z
w
a
GERARD L ' HEUREUX
a Bk 6246 Pg 4 0 8
0
a-
FND STK n' CHAIRMAN DATE
FND
a -- S 490 14 07 E STONE
z 55. 00' ' 22. 73 ' POST
0 r U-
Y
of, NN 3
w N0. 121 N ti ao =
SOTIRIOS & THEOKLITOS r "' p � ". ,`n° FLORA M. 0 ' NEIL
KORISIANOS M N 3 I d1�, i /% 23 `n -� o Bk 6957 Pg 97
Bk 6359 Pg 145 00 LL
0 ,19 n`y O
- OD 0 � � ` 29.V r1r)
zLL
CD
co "' 0
_ 0
N
130.00
U) N0. 123
' 45.00'
N 480 15' 00 " W --
SUBDIVISION
BOSTON STREET ( PLAN of LAND
LOCATED IN
For Registry Use Only
�- SALEM , MASS.
PREPARED BY
1 HEREBY CERTIFY THIS PLAN CONFORMS
TO THE RULES AND REGULATIONS OF THE EASTERN LAND SURVEY ASSOCIATES, INC.
REGISTERS OF DEEDS OF THE COMMONWEALTH CHRISTOPHER R. ME, LLO P. L.S.
OF MASSACHUSETTS . 40 LOWELL STREET PEABODY , MASS .
SCALE= I it = 20' FEB . 79 1986
s' jtcdc T. ��rc�-ct SALEM ASSESSORS MAP 16 PARCEL 123 PREPARED FOR
STEPHEN T. LaMONICA S.I.T. THOMAS TACHE
�a
0 10 20 40 60 80 v
F5818
JtL ar uL_ __
BUTLER STREET APPROVAL UNDER SUBDIVISION
CONTROL LAW NOT REQUIRED
1aTe N JT
SALEM PLANNING BOARD
a n eT
w
LOCUS MAP Z
w
Q
GERARD L ' HEUREUX
a Bk 6246 Pg 408
0
a:
FND STK a" CHAIRMAN DATE
FND
Q — S 490 14 ' 07 ° E STONE
3 55. 00 ' 22. 73 ' POST
O r u- }
zO cD N cn I
Y ,
w N0. 121 N � ti -co
SOTIRIOS & THEOKLITOS r `" O "' o FLORA M. 0 ' NEIL
KORISIANOS _ a 3 I ��, 123 `� '� � Flo Bk 6957 Pg 97
Bk 6 359 Pg 145
0 19 .L2 0
— °° O j 29
IZ ~_ 3
1 L
U _ (f)
� � M O
O /
(\j
O — —I r 0
F?O Q I U) NO. 123
30.00 45.00
N 480 15' 00 " W
SUBDIVISION
BOSTON STREET PLAN of LAND
LOCATED IN
For Registry Use Only
�- SALEM , MASS.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THIS PLAN CONFORMS PREPARED BY
TO THE RULES AND REGULATIONS OF THE EASTERN LAND SURVEY ASSOCIATES, INC.
REGISTERS OF DEEDS OF THE COMMONWEALTH CHRISTOPHER R. ME, LLO P. L. S.
OF MASSACHUSETTS . 40 LOWELL STREET PEABODY , MASS .
SCALE I " = 20' FEB . 79 1986
S4a/.x'` T%4*/) 'Q SALEM ASSESSORS MAP 16 PARCEL 123 PREPARED FOR
STEPHEN T. LaMONICA S.I.T. THOMAS TACHE
�r
0 10 20 40 60 80
F5818