73-75 BOSTON STREET - BOUCHER, DEAN - ZBA 73-75 Boston St. R-2
Dean Boucher
`b
os
r,
L5' �
�J
;.: -� situ >1i �tt1Pm. ,=7nc`ISSc'tLirusPItS
liIIIIrb IIf -!":p'£IIl
70 THE BOARD OF APPEALS:
`e uncersicneo reoresent that ::e i s are .he owners cf a certain parcel of land located
15 oStoti Sw nee F et;
'1 3- . . . . . . ! . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ._tre_ _ ---nno District. 2 2
. . . ; -no told carte ! ' a7Torrea ov _ectionis ; . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
,. ane Aassacnusetts State BuiNina Code.
:- tans cescribinq the work proposed, ^ave been submitted to the Insoector of Buildings in
;ccoroance with Section iX A. I of the Zonina Ordinance.
�5
LJ LZ
C v Y
�0
V
C C ,
L:1 v
The Application for Permit was denied by the Inspector of Buildings for the following
reasons:
D , 2eC_1 /24ppeAt,
The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem
Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to
approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said
Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary
hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero-
gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for
the following reasons:
P2'1',A- 0NevL- 0-ertoe S'v s -T Lam^% 41 2 \ ,,,- \-, "es coop led
\oy A-�,k (3ontio o �_ 9,�er.,L S o ,. �.„ e (d , 1889 be- 2e � p:Rre-d
V-\ ++ f:� 1n4 VL -Ar L-% k-C V Aft.% 4-� ce-S ALaw S ; q2 A. o2eA2 Se-FbsaGlGSi
fao,n++ce� LGk Cn.�Cw-,nqG ho.,A L0 '• S'• 22 fJL %rLi. -teQ ; TU ALL0 --1 Su l
b; v:S'�o .� AFZClL A,p ^,rLh nsc pPPeAL S !
V'`'l SS', o^ 40 1kC PlA v; a CoA 2r� � e"L Er � I�o25e. e i T1.2
L-
0e+VL: ,re.,..,At Url 0er709 nd;..,q -� no,v. -F t~e 1,..-ie.viOVL o', v.,rw�C�_ .
Owner.fie'°'"' ^�"� tc;"^ �o.,el,e ti
ce wv .� 1d (._. volve S�SSiM w.i'Lt AL_ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
uk
t�. - Pel'.+lo - P_V?_ Address- . . . . . .. 2 . . . . ST , . SnLen1
Teleonone. . . . . '� 4 S a 3 v .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.0etitioner. �erU Ati?, lcr ✓�� cL e �
ddress . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
7elepnone. . . . " . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
By. . .${ephew. .�'. L�Je.ly. ,. !�gR . . . . . . . . . . . .
' yS-BJ.r]Y_
.hree copies of the application must be filed with the =ecretary of the Board of
Aopeais with a check, for advertising in the amount of. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
tour 'NeeKs prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals . heck payable to The
_venina ,News.
V 0�gbS er�oi
Oze
4°v nSAF
6lF S �s J
ee y° rFi�� S
,aQ 9
f� o,
OZf /"%906r y s of tP
1 ti y ig °` O
�Q/ Y 40
On y46 "Ob
P' Oy b O9 �' , " ���'�'O a� '�•d,�
OO�Z
all
49 !,;"p
\ • Qc Oyati �a
d �S 6075 4� e
to � ' 0�0 O�
/ Y
/ it/i_t co
pO 9c-
vp 4 e10 Bf..
vm
y
oN d•C4 0046ti
0
v
Jr
OOQ
O cP ss,
p JC 6B'/ •v �/�
o ggZ
PP
1 i'ro Ov
0
, p
'K .
4 c � � ,
,F,CON N,,�;•� to 111 (4�Em' �411issar4u5jetts
�1'K V.. r/\)�Ittnning �nttrD 11
a
'�r000rmus�""` Mm `$aftm Orren
DECISION OF THE REQUEST OF DEAN BOUCHER FOR A REQUEST FOR A
SPECIFIC AND MATERIAL CHANGE AT 73 BOSTON STREET.
A hearing on this request was held on March 17 , 1994 , with the
following Board members present : Chairman Walter B. Power , III,
David Hart , John Moustakis, Debra Hilbert, Chuck Puleo, Carter
Vinson and Kosta Prentakis . Notice of the hearing was sent to
abutters .
The Planning Board, after hearing the evidence presented and at the
request of the petitioner voted unanimously 7-0 to grant leave to
withdraw this petition without prejudice for a Request for a
Specific and Material Change.
GRANT LEAVE TO WITHDRAW WITHOUT PREJUDICE
MARCH 17 , 1994
Walter B. Power , I`II �/
Chairman
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN ISSUED TO THE BOARD OF APPEAL
EX\DH\SMCWTHDR.WN
(Cita of �ttiem, � ttssttchusetts
30
�B nnra of Apeal -
e u i;i
1{ka I J
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF SALEM HOUSING AUTHORITY (PETITIONERS) ,
DEAN BOUCHER (OWNER) REQUESTING ELIMINATION OF PREVIOUSLY IMPOSED
REQUIREMENTS OF A SPECIAL PERMIT AND AN ADDITIONAL SPECIAL PERMIT AT
73 BOSTON STREET. (R-2)
A hearing on this petition was held February 16, 1994 with the
following Board Members present: Stephen Touchette, Vice Chairman;
George Ahmed, Albert Hill and Associate Member Nina Cohen. Notice of
the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing
were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with
Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioner are requesting the removal of the owner occupied condition
on a decision dated July 24, 1985 which allow property to be converted
to a three family and to reduce the number of parking spaces from
seven ( 7) to four (4) . Petitioner is also requesting a Special Permit
to allow an existing deck that encroaches on side setbacks. The
property is located in the R-2 district and is owned by Dean Boucher.
The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to
this request for a Special Permit is Section 5-3(j ) , which provides as
follows:
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance,
the Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and
conditions set forth in Sections 8-6 and 9-4, grant Special Permits
for alterations and reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and
for changes, enlargement, extension or expansion of nonconforming
lots, land, structures, and uses, provided, however, that such change,
extension, enlargement or expansion shall not be substantially more
detrimental than the existing nonconforming use to the neighborhood.
In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit
requests, guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be
granted upon a finding by the Board that the grant of the Special
Permit will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare
of the City's inhabitants.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence
presented at the hearing and after viewing the plans. makes the
following findings of fact:
1. The reduction of the parking requirement would impact the
neighborhood.
2. The proposal as submitted would have a negative impact on the
surrounding neighborhood.
I
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF SALEM HOUSING AUTHORITY (PETITIONERS) ,
DEAN BOUCHER FOR ZONING RELIEF AT 13 BOSTON ST. , SALEM
page two
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the';eviden.ce
presented, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
I. The relief requested cannot be granted without substantial
detriment to the public good or without nullifying and substantially
derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the
ordinance.
2. The granting of the Special Permit requested will not be in
harmony with the neighborhood and will not promote the public health,
safety, convenience or welfare of the City's inhabitants.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted one ( 1) in favor (Mr.
Ahmed) three (3) in opposition to the motion to grant the relief
requested. Having failed to garner the four affirmative votes
required to pass, the motion to grant fails and the petition for a
Special Permit is denied.
Special Permit Denied
February 16, 1994 ) .
Albert C. Hill, Member
Board of Appeal
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE
CITY CLERK
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section
17 of MGL Chapter 40A and shall be filed within 20 days after the date
of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant
to MGL Chapter 40A, Section 11, the Variance or Special Permit granted
herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision, bearing the
certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no
appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it
has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry
or Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is
recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title.
Board of Appeal
I
0 iH= -0.=.BD OF APPEALS :
Undersicned represent that he is are the owners of a certain parcel of land located
;0. . . . . . . 73. B.aston. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . :. . .. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .Street, Zoning District. R2 . .
and said parcel is affected by Section(s) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
the !+assachusetts State Building Code.
ns cescribing the work proposed, have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in
ordance tvl th Section IX A. 1 of the Zoning Ordinance.
Salem Housing Authority ( SHA) is the "Buyer" under an executed Purchase
and Sale Agreement for the premises located at 73 Boston Street,
Salem, Massachusetts. A special Permit•.was-,granted allowing the
structure thereon to be converted to a three-family dwelling with
the condition it be owner occupied and provide 7 parking spaces
on site or on adjacent lot #75. The petitioner asks the Board
to eliminate the "owner occupi d" co jIttion nd to lower thepark -
ing
ark -
ing requ rement to 4 spaces aned in a� 1 ion o grant a special
permit /t� er non-conforming existing deck located 6 . 5 ' from the side-
line o the property.
Application for Permit was denied by the Inspector of Buildings for the following
;sons:
DIRECT APPEAL
e Undersioned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem
nine Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to
prove the application fee pe , it to build as filed, as the enforcement of said
nine By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary
rdship to the Undersigned and relief nay be granted without substantially dero-
ting .from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for
E following reasons:
The relief requested will not be detrimental to the public good
, because the changes requested should have no, noticeable impact
on 'the 'surrounding neighborhood ; as the building is an existing
three family, the deck is in existence and the zoning requires T z
5 parking spaces . ^�
v+
0
W
_F
t..L7
Dean Boucher and
Owner. . . . . .xim• •Bouchtr . . . . . . . . .,. . . . . . . . . . .
c -
73 Boston Street
Address. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Telephone. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Petitioner. • Salem Housing ,Au thb;}ty, • • • •
27 Charter Street
Address . • .galem; • MA • •aI9170. . . . . . • • • . • • . . •
Date. �al7.�� . . . • • • • • • Te4e � . •( 508 ) 7 4-4432
�� Y
Berir . ' �alemqMA 01970
Lu
Three copies of the application must be filed wiecre ary of the Board of
,-=_als with a check, for advertising in the amount of. . . . . . . . . . . .
`r- r •:eei;s prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals. Check payable to The
I;ews.
at +�� r rrr c 7�i I 'n t L4 V
s � Vn S �
o -
_ 1S N01 S O8
-- r--NEW ST. ..LINE .... _
71.98.
«r -
-'IVO. 79,
O. .� ___ .�.Lr- _-rte'n; -s., - , - i•' _ .
gt
m
Ar
I�
-Z . .
O �.�_. 'Zi .
p J 0
rn QD
'" 0 0
_DZIl
Z m r
> - N
J
J � _
N U�-
Jf- luj 4�k d
i.
p O
0 J
O
o
Z
OLD CELLAR _
Ir,... 00 s
pUTNAM ST 1S
s
1
O
Dc
tl� Y v j
J
OI 8 t
w
M ; Is tJ O
cl
u
LLJ _
1
I - �
U- 91V I 21bd
1 I
I d
I
W 77Vix �f1D
I C I
,
1 � � � 15 N1111I1nd
I
02. S
a V 3
\ I
S L $ z r°
G
�
m
Lin
cl
Frl
Fri
•.o-�� x ,�a-;�z � � ---t
1 _
i
,I
r
I
i
I
v1.tfU of �211PT1t� c'���SFIL�118Ptt8
>J: �nar3 of c4pPal
41r 1.p'1.R
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF CLIFFORD & ELLEN CLARK FOR
A SPECIAL PERMIT FOR 73 BOSTON ST.
A hearing on this petition was held July 24, 1 U Th UOEU loWng Board
Members present: James Hacker, Chairman; Messrs. ,Th
u er, Strout and
Associate Member Bencal. Notice of the hearingjRag sent to abutters and others
and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in
accordance with Massachusetts General Law Chap tpMSf1 V, ShLeM.RACS.
Petitioners, owners of the premises along with Joel Decareau, request a Special
Permit to convert an existing two family into a three family dwelling in this
R-2 District.
The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this request
for a Special Permit is Section V B 10, which provides as follows:
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this
Ordinance, the Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the
procedure and conditions set forth in Section VIII F and IX D,
grant Special Permits for alterations and reconstruction of
nonconforming structures, and for changes, enlargement, ex-
tension or expansion of nonconforming lots, land, structures,
and uses, provided, however, that such change, extension enlargement
or expansion shall not be substantially more detrimental than the
existing nonconforming use to the neighborhood.
In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit requests,
guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted upon a finding
by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will promote the public health,
safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants.
The Board of Appeal, after hearing the evidence presented -at the hearing and
after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact:
1 . No opposition was presented to the plan;
2. The plan will not substantially affect traffice or parking in
the neighborhood.
On the basis of the above findings cf fact, and on the evidence presented at the
hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1 . The relief requested is in harmony with the purpose and Intent
of the Ordinance;
2. The relief requested will not be substantially more detrimental
to the public good than the existing two family dwelling.
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF CLIFFORD & ELLEN CLARK FOR
A SPECIAL PERMIT FOR 73 BOSTON ST. , SALEM
page two
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the
relief requested, provided that:
1 . A minimum of seven (7) parking spaces be maintained, along
with access thereto, either on the premise or on the adjacent lot;
2. The dwelling be owner occupied;
3. a Certificate of Occupancy be obtained.
SPECIAL PERMIT GRANTED
Scott E. Charnas, Secretary
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK
Ir SHALL BE MADE PURSUANT TO SECTION 17 OF THE HISS.
B, WITHIN A DAYS AMR THE DATE DF FMAZ
APPEAL FROV. THIS DECISIT.1 t. A`1Y. WTHI ;R
GENERAL LA's 5. CHA.'i ER EDC.r""EAND S OF LTHE CITY c VARIANCE OR S°""'
OF THIS DE_C O;; I:1 THE ERT•
.r„F,1. V, S. C44rTER COS. SECT NOFITHEOECISION. Bmi'”
PUo<o.';T TC I.: >- n;E EF,ECT U"TIL F CO
PY?C DAYS F:AVE ELAPSED AHD NO APPEAL HAS _ iS
GF.AG;ED HECEiN. S'�-, �.F..'. -{r-.h HAS BEEN MVISSED ;J.E CF THE OWNER
FILAl1.N Of 1H` l'^:: APrEAc H.:S EECN FILE. THAT IT .:.
OR THAT, 1F Sz li ' AND INDEXED UNDER !'I*-
AND
IN THE SLOTH ESSEX R" �YONcTHEEOYlNER'S CERTIFILA7E Of TI1LE.
OF RECORD OR is RECORDED AND BOARD OF APPEAL
_ Qc, bdbto S �
rw ,
BOSTON - -
1S N01 S 08
__.... NEW 57i" LINE
OppO'LZ
- - - - -71.98 _-
79
tea:
1.21
cc
cc
m ID
Q O
Oa co 0
Z OD
J — N
J I
✓1 U
z � 9.k •Q �
-
� 0 0
¢ J
o
3
Z
OLD CELLAR
o r
06 s
-- ST S wdN .1nd `
pUT. NA. M
'`. e•�`� OCT 14 3 24 PM '81
o� < (fiJU of j3txlem, CEtt55arjju5eff9
FILEN
s �j
�DarD A71tAppeul CITY CLElt[;.LALEK.!+ASL.
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF DEAN T. BOUCHER FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AND
VARIANCE FOR 75 BOSTON STREET (R-2)
A hearing on this petition was held August 5, 1987 with the following Board Members
present: James Hacker, Chairman; Messrs. , Fleming, Luzinski and Associate Members
Dore and LaBrecque. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and
notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accord-
ance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
The petitioner, represented by Attorney George Vallis is seeking a Special Permit
and Variance to allow four (4) residential units to be constructed on an undersized
lot at 75 Boston Street, which is located in an R-2 district.
The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this request
for a Special Permit is Section V B 10, which provides as follows:
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance
the Board of Appeal may, in accordance with procedure and conditions
set forth in Section VIII F and IX D, grant Special Permits for
alterations and reconstruction of nonconforming structures,a nd for
changes, enlargement, extension or expansion of nonconforming lots,
land, structures, and uses, provided, however, that such change,
extension, enlargement or expansion shall not be substantially more
detrimental than the existing nonconforming use to the neighborhood.
In mroe general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit requests,
guided by. the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted upon a finding
by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will promote the public health,
safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants.
The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding of the
Board that:
a. special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect
the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally
affecting other lands, buildings and structures in the same district;
b. literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve
substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner; and
c. desiratle relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating fror.. the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
The Board of Appeal, after hearing the evidence, and after viewing the plans
presented, cakes the following findings of fact:
1 . No opposition to the petition :.,as presented at the hearing;
2. Councillor at Large Robert Gauthier spoke in support of the petition,
indicating that the proposed four (4 ) townhouses would be an
appropriate development in one of the main entrance corridors of
the City.
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF DEAN T. EDOCHER FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AND
A VARIANCE AT 75 BOSTON STREET, SAL&E.
page two
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the
hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1 . The proposed development will promote the convenience and welfare of
the City's inhabitants and will be in harmony with the district;
2. The relief requested can be granted without substantial detriment or
without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of purpose .
of the Ordinance;
3. Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property but
not the district generally;
4. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Ordinance would involve
substantial economic hardship to the petitioner.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the Varaince
and Special Permit, allowing the construction of four (4) residential units on the
undersized lot, subject to the following conditions:
1 . All construction be done as per the plans submitted to the Board;
2. Fourteen (14) off street parking spaces be maintained, as per the parking
plan submitted to the Board;
3. A right of way from Putnam Street, allowing vehicular access, be created
by deed, and properly recorded in the South District, Essex County
Registry of Deeds;
4. All the requirements of the Salem Fire Department, relative to fire
safety, be adhere to;
5. Proper numbering. of the four (4) residential units be obtained from the
Assessors Department, City of Sale;_;
6. All construction meet the re:uirements of the State Building Code;
7. Building be obtained from the Sale= Building Inspector;
8. A Certificate of Occupancy be obtained for each unit prior to occupancy;
9 The four (4) residential units have exteriors that blend with the existing
neighborhood;
10. Al vehicular access and egress to and from the site be from Putnam Street,
vehicular access and egress ._einS prohibited to and from Boston Street.
VARIANCE & SPECIAL PERMIT GRANTED -)
le
(6
APPEAL FROM, THIS OE;:ISI0:1. I? ANY. SHALL 6E L:ADE PURSUANT TO SE •1 CF '
GENERAL LnV;S. LH-F-,ER 8M A'7 SHALL EE FEEL' WITHIN is Ch1' ace_>< _ M. Fleming, Esq. , Vic Chairman
6g. THIS CE.!S::'• 1': THE C-1. OF THE CITY C_EPK _ „T n•
,_A.GQH !QE'; } IIS;tDEC�SIOfir-4iA5 L _^FFrL ` rr�°'?:T11 _:r A..:dII'G BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK
. - c - TIL C01' r ..
_. .
7--
Cr H: L;. C_c E:• ln ,: r r".:n_✓
OR -I P. IF S'J':r: :.I; AFF EALF __ ..__ _E �.: Pi-'Ed.d C '• - '.`r ' - .i THE '
RECL30EJ 17; THC S--.7H. ES__'-
01 REI" OR IS F.E'CROE° :.•. ^�• OI: Ti!E O:Y:E�'S CERiiFILA:E 11TLE.
Juj C. '89
J (9itu of $Ufrm, a55aMu89ttfiLZ_;
,:ITY
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF DEAN BOUCHER FOR "`ARIANCES
AT 75 BOSTON ST. ' R-2)
A hearing on this petition was held June c , ' 989 .with t..e foilcwing Board Members
present: James Fleming, :hairman: .?essrs. , F-bonio, .ore and LaBrecoue. ;otice
of the nearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of -.Le nearing were
properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with :Iassachusetts
General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioner, owner of the property, is requesting a Variance to allow construction
of a four ? 4) unit residential building and garage in this R-2 4-istrict.
The Variances :which have peen requested may be granted .Pon a finding of ,he
Board that:
a. special conditions and circumstances exist which =_speciall; affect the
Land, building or structure involved and which are not Teneraily affecting
other lands, buildings and structures in the same district:
b. literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance .would involve
substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner;
c. desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public_
good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of
the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented and
after viewing the plans, makes the following findings cf fact:
1 . There was no opposition and several people, including the ';Dara
Councillor Leonard O' Leary, spoke in favor.
2. A previous Special Permit and Variance had been granted cc this property
allowing construction of four (4) attached dwellings together .with a garage.
The topography of the lot plus substantial areas cf '_edge make this a
more feasible development of the land.
:'here .will be adequate parking on site
)n the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence Presented at the
nearing, the Bcara of Appeal concludes as follows:
Special conditions exist wnich especially affect the subect properly but
not the district generally;
_. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Ordinance would :work a
substantial hardship to the petitioner;
L
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF DEAN BLUCHER FOR VARIANCES
.T 75 BOSTON STREET, SALEM
gage two
The relief reauest can be granted without substantiaidetriment to the
public good and without nuilifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the Duroose of the Ordinance.
?herefore, the Zoning Board of Appeai voted unanimously, to grant the
reauested Variances from minimum lot area, side yard setbacks, front yard
setbacks and use to allow construction of a four -esidental unit building plus
arage, subject to the following conditions:
All construction be done as per the pians submitted.
Eight (8) on site parking spaces be maintained, as Per the plan submitted.
right of way from Putnam Street, allowing vehicular access, to created
by deed, and properlty recorded in the South District, Essex County
Registry of Deeds.
11 the requirements of the Salem Fire Department, relative to fire
Safety be adhered to.
Froper numbering of the four (4) units be obtained from the City of
:alem Assessors Department.
All construction comply with the Massachusetts State Building Code.
Building Permit be obtained from the Inspector of Buildings. -
A Certificate of Occupancy for each unit be obtained.
xterior finishes of the proposed building and garage blend with the
existing neighborhood.
10. All vehicular access and egress to and from the site be from Putnam Street,
vehicular access and egress being prohibited to and from Boston Street.
7ARIANCES GRANTED
.,James M. Fleming, Esq. , CPirman
COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK
decision. if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of
_:. .. .-rpl Laws. C`.:rrer 808. and Emil be filed vnthin 20 days
- .- cl ta:: cecisicn in ins cifice of the City Clerk.
"' - - -. r_^.cr_! Lr;i ta:o•er 803. Section 11. the Variance
.r r. .r-:t '•nn:?i harem cn.cll rt tj'<e erf--ct until a copy of the
ercation of tho City Clark that 20 days have
has tocn itlad. or trnt. it such appeal has been
....
:^,q 6-G-:is.ed Cr denial is recorded in the South Essex
... -.... 77 ^c].!s and i;Waxzd undar the name or the cr.vner of record of.
,s rcco.-L rd and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title.
BOARD OF APPEAL
g
Ctu of 'Sttiem, 'Mttssadjusetts
+4 �Ranra of �k"ral
i
JUNE 03, 1994
tl
YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT AS OF MAY 26, 1994 THE DECISION OF
THE BOARD OF APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED IN THE OFFICE'OF THE'CITY CLERK TO
GRANT THE PETITION OF DEAN & KIM BOUCHER FOR VARIANCES TO ALLOW PROPERTY
AT 73-75 BOSTON STREET TO BE DIVIDED, THERE WILL BE NO CHANGE IN USE.
BOARD OF APPEAL
BRENDA M. SUMRALL
CLERK OF THE BOARD
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY
CLERK.
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17, of
MGL Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing
of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to MGL Chapter
40A. , Section 11, the Variance/Special Permit granted herein shall not take
effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City
Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if
such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is
recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of
the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of
title.
Board of Appeal
of .Salem, 49assadjusetts
•�' oara of
peal
e � (j 4y
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF DEAN & KIM BOUCHER
FOR VARIANCE AT 73-75 BOSTON STREET (R-2)
A hearing on this petition was held April 27, 1994 with the following Board
Members present: Stephen Touchette, Acting Chairman; Stephen O'Grady, Gary
Barrett, Associate Members Nina Cohen and Arthur Labrecque. Notice of the
hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were
properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with
Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioners, owners of the property, are requesting Variances from density
regulations to allow property consisting of two residential buildings to be
divided, there will be no change in use.. Property is located in the R-2
district.
The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding by this
Board that:
1. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the
land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting
other lands, buildings and structures involved.
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would
involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner.
3. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented
at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings
of fact:
1. On July 24, 1985, the Board of Appeal granted a Special Permit to allow
the property at 73 Boston St. to be converted to a three (3) family
dwelling. One of the conditions of this granting was that the building be
owner occupied.
2. June 6, 1989 the Board of Appeal granted variances to allow
construction of a four (4) unit residential building and garage with ten
conditions.
3. February 16, 1994 the Board of Appeal denied the request to have the
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF DEAN & KIM BOUCHER FOR A t Gr LO (} ti5F
VARIANCE AT 73-75 BOSTON STREET, SALEM
page two
owner occupied condition which was placed on the decision granting three
(3) units at 73 Boston St. removed and to have the condition that seven (7)
parking spaces be maintained at 73 Boston St. be removed.
4. The present request is to allow the property to be divided into two (2)
lots, 73 Boston St. remaining a three unit structure which will have the
required five (5) parking spaces and 75 Boston St. will remain a four unit
structure and will maintain the eight (8) parking spaces as required in the
1989 decision.
5. The Salem Housing Authority, the petitioner for the February 16, 1994
decision which was denied, may become the owners of 73 Boston St.
6. There is an easement from Putnam St. through 75 Boston St. , allowing
vehicles access to and from 73 Boston st. , said easement is a deeded right
of way and is properly recorded at the Registry of Deeds.
7. A petition signed by eight (8) neighbors and abutters was submitted
in favor.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented
at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1. Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property
but not the district in general.
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would
involve substantial hardship to the petitioner.
3. Desirable relief can be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0 to grant the
variance requested, subject to the following conditions:
1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, ordinances,
codes and regulations.
2. All construction shall be done in strict accordance with the plans and
dimensions submitted.
Variance Granted
April 27, 1994
Nina V. Cohen, Member
Board of Appeal
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF DEAN & KIM BOUCHER FOR A VARIANCE
AT 73-75 BOSTON STREET, SALEM
page three
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY
CLERK
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of
the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20
days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City
Clerk. Pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11, the
Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a
copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20
days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has
been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South
Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record
or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title.
Board of Appeal
s
a
- N
- t
� L
(Gity of .Salem, � Httssttcl�u$et
,4 �gnara of �vreal .�
14 z, 9y
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF DEAN & KIM BOUCHER
FOR VARIANCE AT 73-75 BOSTON STREET (R-2)
A hearing on this petition was held April 27, 1994 with the following Board
Members present: Stephen Touchette, Acting Chairman; Stephen O'Grady, Gary
Barrett, Associate Members Nina Cohen and Arthur Labrecque. Notice of the
hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were
properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with
Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioners, owners of the property, are requesting Variances from density
regulations to allow property consisting of two residential buildings to be
divided, there will be no change in use. Property is located in the R-2
district.
The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding by this
Board that:
1. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the
land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting
other lands, buildings and structures involved.
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would
involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner.
3. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented
at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings
of fact:
1. On July 24, 1985, the Board of Appeal granted a Special Permit to allow
the property at 73 Boston St. to be converted to a three (3) family
dwelling. One of the conditions of this granting was that the building be
owner occupied.
2. June 6, 1989 the Board of Appeal granted variances to allow
construction of a four (4) unit residential building and garage with ten
conditions.
3. February 16, 1994 the Board of Appeal denied the request to have the
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF DEAN & KIM BOUCHER FOR A (j!i
VARIANCE AT 73-75 BOSTON STREET, SALEM _
page two SS
owner occupied condition which was placed on the decision granting three
(3) units at 73 Boston St. removed and to have the condition that seven (7)
parking spaces be maintained at 73 Boston St. be removed.
4. The present request is to allow the property to be divided into two (2)
lots, 73 Boston St. remaining a three unit structure which will have the
required five (5) parking spaces and 75 Boston St. will remain a four unit
structure and will maintain the eight (8) parking spaces as required in the
1989 decision.
5. The Salem Housing Authority, the petitioner for the February 16, 1994
decision which was denied, may become the owners of 73 Boston St.
6. There is an easement from Putnam St. through 75 Boston St. , allowing
vehicles access to and from 73 Boston st. , said easement is a deeded right
of way and is properly recorded at the Registry of Deeds.
7. A petition signed by eight (8) neighbors and abutters was submitted
in favor.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented
at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1. Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property
but not the district in general.
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would
involve substantial hardship to the petitioner.
3. Desirable relief can be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0 to grant the
variance requested, subject to the following conditions:
1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, ordinances,
codes and regulations.
2. All construction shall be done in strict accordance with the plans and
dimensions submitted.
Variance Granted
April 27, 1994
Nina V. Cohen, Member
Board of Appeal
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF DEAN & KIM BOUCHER FOR A VARIANCE
AT 73-75 BOSTON STREET, SALEM
page three
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY
CLERK
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of
the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20
days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City
Clerk. Pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11, the
Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a
copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20
days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has
been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South
Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record
or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title.
Board of Appeal
Ln
a
- ' N
_ LTJ
L.
s �
-� GO
ofttlem, � usstttljuset
�Ruttra of Aupeal �y?°
s
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF DEAN & KIM BOUCHER
FOR VARIANCE AT 73-75 BOSTON STREET (R-2)
A hearing on this petition was held April 27, 1994 with the following Board
Members present: Stephen Touchette, Acting Chairman; Stephen O'Grady, Gary
Barrett, Associate Members Nina Cohen and Arthur Labrecque. Notice of the
hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were
properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with
Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioners, owners of the property, are requesting Variances from density
regulations to allow property consisting of two residential buildings to be
divided, there will be no change in use. Property is located in the R-2
district.
The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding by this
Board that:
1. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the
land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting
other lands, buildings and structures involved.
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would
involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner.
3. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented
at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings
of fact:
1. On July 24, 1985, the Board of Appeal granted a Special Permit to allow
the property at 73 Boston St. to be converted to a three (3) family
dwelling. One of the conditions of this granting was that the building be
owner occupied.
2. June 6, 1989 the Board of Appeal granted variances to allow
construction of a four (4) unit residential building and garage with ten
conditions.
3. February 16, 1994 the Board of Appeal denied the request to have the
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF DEAN & KIM BOUCHER FOR A Fa' LC kg till
VARIANCE AT 73-75 BOSTON STREET, SALEM
page two
owner occupied condition which was placed on the decision granting three
(3) units at 73 Boston St. removed and to have the condition that seven (7)
parking spaces be maintained at 73 Boston St. be removed.
4. The present request is to allow the property to be divided into two (2)
lots, 73 Boston St. .remaining a three unit structure which will have the
required five (5) parking spaces and 75 Boston St. will remain a four unit
structure and will maintain the eight (8) parking spaces as required in the
1989 decision.
5. The Salem Housing Authority, the petitioner for the February 16, 1994
decision which was denied, may become the owners of 73 Boston St.
6. There is an easement from Putnam St. through 75 Boston St. , allowing
vehicles access to and from 73 Boston st. , said easement is a deeded right
of way and is properly recorded at the Registry of Deeds.
7. A petition signed by eight (8) neighbors and abutters was submitted
in favor.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented
at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1. Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property
but not the district in general.
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would
involve substantial hardship to the petitioner.
3. Desirable relief can be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0 to grant the
variance requested, subject to the following conditions:
1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, ordinances,
codes and regulations.
2. All construction shall be done in strict accordance with the plans and
dimensions submitted.
Variance Granted
April 27, 1994
Nina V. Cohen, Member
Board of Appeal
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF DEAN & KIM BOUCHER FOR A VARIANCE
AT 73-75 BOSTON STREET, SALEM
page three
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY
CLERK
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of
the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20
days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City
Clerk. Pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11, the
Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a
copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20
days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has
been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South
Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record
or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title.
Board of Appeal
x
a
N
i
r
a
:n L
V
DATE OF HEARING a
PETITIONER
p.lJ
LOCATION 93 ' 11,5
MOTION: TO GRANT SECOND p C�r" AMENDMENT SECOND
TO DENY SECOND
TO RE-HEAR SECOND
WITHDRAW SECOND
CONTINUE SECOND
ROLL CALL PRESENT qR g DENY AMEND WITHDRAW RE-HEAR CONTINUE
GARY M. BARRETTy
ALBERT C. HILL
(9 STEPHEN O'GRADY
STEPHEN TOUCHETTE
ASSOCIATE MEMBERS `r
NINA V. COHEN
ARTHUR LEBRECQUE
CONDITIONS: k�i
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
r � Boarn of pprai
TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS:
_`ie Unaersign��reoreesento that he is are the owners of a certain parcel of land located
1-: . . . . . . !�. . . . .s. nee + , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Street; Zonino District. 2-:2,
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : ano =aid carcel arrecteo by --ectionls �l . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
zne +,assachuserts State Building Code.
'lans cescribing the work proposed. have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in
;ccoroance with Section IX A. 1 of the Zoning Ordinance.
n p
Cn ve
.max
d N oW v,
N J uPY
C9 W�t _y
cw
� N �
cc
V
The Application for Permit wasdenied by the Inspector of Buildings for the following
reasons:
D � 2ec� gpPeal_
The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem
Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to
approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said
Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary
hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero-
gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for
the fallowing reasons:
pRA% l% c). eve 2ec��es� s tLro tv2 , p} 1' weS /JooipAea
� v� }lnA f3ontio o� /�Ppewt S o 1JNe G 1c18 `1 be 2e � c�-tee-d
jC\ f,,,n.i\-,ew EInMaT V A2'% 0'\ . ce_S -Q&o. S : pe A.._, n 02eArt SeFbActcs ,
fco.noy., lak Looevz.^te rN. t, L-oe - 5'• 2e 9e cjrt0 Tn ALIO +J SQS �
b; �j,%%,\ AF t{� lgpPno ��a� g.� ib2 1'JOArty� n @ AppeA� S , SuN2, -
AOec\ 2Q
Vrn.t��.+ C2S Jte C.`�fe
%-%c r) c^r fie *3n. r) w',-1-two„{ S ,� �S'e A
C:) VLlA hifh✓� .
CJtL.E i..,ie.ti{ o4' +L.e
, SOwner. � c. l..e. n. ._
. . . . . . . . .
Ce u't1Al.
hr�+u, slap Cir, -YiYA Lew�Y
Telephone. . . . . S. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Petitioner. . . . . . . . . . .p. 3 "�
Des,..., ,c.., 1ci.,. . . .�•,cl,e . . . . . .
ddress . . . . . . . /4riT� vvL .S T. . .13A '-.e.,
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
_ace. . .l., gq.y. . - g o3oS
elepnone. . . . . . . .`1.�:. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . .
7ys.ga r)t_
Three copies of the application must be filed with the Secretary of the Board of
Appeals with a check, for advertising in the amount of.
=our weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals . Check payable to The
-venins News.
CITY OF SALEM
CITY OF SALEM BOARD OF APPEAL
BOAKD OF APPEAL 745-9595 Ext. 381
745-9595 Ext. 381 Will hold a public hearing for all persons inter-
Will hold a public hearing Cor all persons inter- ested in the petition submitted by DEAN AND
ested in the petition submitted by DEAN AND KIM BOUCHER for Variances from requirements
KIM DOUCHE R for Variances from requirementsof Table I Residential Density Regulations to allow
i
of Table I Residential Density Regulations to allow 73-75 BOSTON ST. (R-2) to be divided, use to
73-75 BOSTON ST. (R-2) to be divided, use to ' remain the same. Said hearing to be held
remain the same. Said hearing to be held WEDNESDAY,APRIL 27,1994 AT 6:00 P.M.,ONE
WEDNESDAY,APRIL 27,1994 AT 6:00 P.M.,ONE SALEM GREEN, second floor.
SALEM GREEN, second floor. STEPHEN TOUCHETTE, Vice Chairman
STEPHEN TOUCHETTE, Vice Chairman April 13, 20, 1994 SN40176
April 13, 2 f_
Q SN40176 1994 �
f
Li
—_-_--
(
e CITY OF SALEM
CITY OF SALEM BOARD OF APPEAL
BOARD OF APPEAL Will hold a 745-9595 Et. 381
745-9595 Ext. 381 public hearingfor all persons inter-
Will hold a public hearing for all persons inter- ested in the petition submitted by DEAN AND
ested in the petition submitted by DEAN AND KIM BOUCHER for Variances from requirements
KIM BOUCHER for Variances from requirements of Table I Residential Density Regulations to allow
of Table I Residential Density Regulations to allow 73-75 BOSTON ST. (R-2) to be divided, use to
73-75 BOSTON ST. (R-2) to be divided, use to remain the same. Said hearing to be held
remain the same. Said hearing to be held WEDNESDAY,APRIL 27,1994 AT 6:00 P.M.,ONE
WEDNESDAY,APRIL 27,1994 AT 6:00 P.M.,ONE SALEM GREEN, second floor.
SALEM GREEN, second floor. April ST 20H gg TOUCHETTE, Vice Chairman
STEPHEN TOUCHETTE, Vice Chairman SN40176
April 13, 20, 1994 SN40176
e
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
+ �TU III2TlPIYT, rtIS�FTL�TIISPS
'Boar'1 u{ Appra i
TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS:
-:•,e Unaersigned reoresent that �,e is are :he owners of a certain parcei of land located
- . !13- 57„ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Street; Zonino Oistrict. �.'2
. . . . . . • • • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . c ana Baia cartel arfectea by �_ectionisj . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
zne :•+assacnusetts State Buildina Code.
Tans eescribing the work -proposed, have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in
;ccoroance with Section IX A. 1 of the Zoning Ordinance.
� va
0-
Uj bx c <
o r
rno
G7 LU x n
cn s-
The Application for Permit was denied by the Inspector of Buildings for the following
reasons:
D , 2ec� � PPeAL,
The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem
Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to
approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said
Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary
hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero-
gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for
the following reasons:
�evLs'T r��o v e \ o+ aeS Aoep led
2ectoe
�z o ti e Ca , 1989 be 2en�C:n �d
A f-�n',V.en_ -I-L1A-V V Alt'% ce-S -Q&ow Sloe. ANO ute1012 13e41DACV%
En ringed lL-0 'r S' 22Se ^�rt� -ZeV� Ta A1—Loti SQS —
t) v: AF'tC I(L AP n.a 4CI c+, -\L.Q 6 o A YL0 Al SI SUS -
rh% ss', OP, . " 'q 60,V\ (a.V-1 'Com 'TL.2
U wwi^w ceS Jte Ct�2 s'ceo two.., 3e Goay."ter.)
CJeAv� �new4 U ✓L v] eato9na;�+c, f +�o«. +L.e t le vi o� + e d 'Ln'. evvS cL
peAw n�..,v> LO;..� (So 0 CI+e/L..
•�. � civ s�
Owner. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
C>yc.�aw�•.• ce w c, .� 1d � e ss+r.w.�'ttAL
Sh2p `I �y-- ��••� AIow2�L... Address. . . . . . .A'-7Y YY � . . . . . . .
7elephone. . . . . n 'A S- 6 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
°eti ti oner. P?^" ' �)u. cL,erL
Address . . . Ariz��n_ ST S"IL.e»,
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
-eleDnone. . . . . . O.y.S:o 3O. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
By. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
')95--8a'7Y_
Three copies of the application must be filed with the Secretary of the Board of
appeais .with a check, for advertising in the amount of. . . .
=our aeeKS prior to the meeting of the Board of Aopeais . Check payable to The
_venins News.
CY�e
We, the undersigned abutters and neighbors, partition
the Salem Board of Appeals to grant the requested variance
of Dean and Kim Boucheer at 73-75 Boston St . The variance
wouldaallow the property to be partition into two distinct
lots. We feel that the petition should be granted in that
relief granted will be benificial to the neighborhood.
T-6-v' 5"'l
a
3�3zx±x%X%
9
Professional Land Surveyors 8 Civil Engineers
ESSEX SURVEY SERVICE. 1958 - 1986
OSBORN PALMER 1911 - 1970
BRADFORD & WEED 1885 - 1972
April 5, 1994
Ms. Brenda Sumrall
Salem Board of Appeals
Salem City Hall
One Salem Green
Salem, MA 01970
RE: F 10096
247 Jefferson Avenue ,
Salem, MA
F 9856
71 - 73 Boston Street
Salem, MA
Dear Ms. Sumrall:
Please find enclosed eleven (11) copies of the Variance Plan for
the above referenced projects. These are being provided to you
at Attorney Lovely's request.
If you have any questions, comments or need additional copies,
please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
Christopher R. Mello P.L.S.
President
Enclosure
cc: Stephen Lovely, Esq.
104 LOWELL STREET
PEABODY, MASS. 01960
(508)531-8121
FAX:(508)531-5920
A
'dl J
NJ
/°.
e °
J °p
O
299 0
r?/j so /.89 Ac Q
300
AC
Q
/v
OO g X60 � Y `u. 14
,ryh ?93 (` ,�.\ /
res a 3yoa 4
C7 A j 1-301
Ln
? 0
v��+ mi�•e O q,0 4 0 s
n 07'Lo
CP
d.
ou
,s • vJ q,09ry5 6 R0Ij
ol
T O M6 ti P np X90.
colew
2 3
r$e} � c TSF yyi •��
age Cl
so 383u o
324 <
BOARD OF ASSESSORS PAGE:
CITY HALL
'M
22
-LIS
1, 13
..... 'ERS
3
..........
4 SUBJECT PROPERTY: MAP: 15 L o,r,,. 0291 SUFF. d
5 PROPERTY ADDRESS: 0073 BOSTON STREET' 4&i,�', 0076- &44� 7
N T 7"
7 1 ........... .......
L NY, IIll 9
KD
..........
3S
I'M, ......... ...... ..............
'A
..............RESS "
to ,3
0 1t 4
15 0291 007J BOSTON STREET- BOUCHER DEAN T .13 ARTHUR ST ISO
12 nrimigg'y kTP4 r C3AI FM PIA 0-1 7n—?Af-)'i Is
0 :3 I_
eln, 17
�10N'Il 'REET" T�, . .....
4 ........ ..... .
EAN
.......... l�6014KEIY ...... n;
. ............
15 ..........
... to
.......................... ......J�QL PUMAMRT....... I,,..I....
16it
CAMERON HARRYATT E SALEM MA 01970 22
70
15 0276 801 00 22 3 PU I'NAM STREET U-1 CLOUTIER RAYMOND W 7 HIGHLAND AVE 23
8PY-I.)E&�i v mA niqi� ...... 1.
19-1 24Y5
20:'' 80 0025l PUTNAIII STREET'I�c! CLOU.TJEW;RAYM6N[j :W,''. �,l 2,�DURWS CIRC1 E
• 26
...H, 0
OUTJ E:R.,.�T*HE.R`ESA`R'% ... ..... ... .........
CL 27 •
21
........I....
22 W2 28
023 LEBLANC SUSAN SALEM MA0NIIGA 01970 •
329 00
15 0283 00i'4 PUTNAM STREET CYR A RALPH 48 HANSON STREET 31
24 32
25
-PSle'�'31
IS :
.......... .......
e ........... 1,4-1:1l 11,11-35
27 is_ibl S-fjR��gt, I" l I l,
......f'�jjp 'PLIER JR
28 SALEM PIA LI-1970 37
•29 15 0292 0079 BOSTON STREET' BOUCHER BOSTON STREET REALTY TRUST' 13 ARTHUR ST :: 0
30 801 1Cf4E_R SA) FM "'Aru 40
QQ41NFY KTO F TRq 014 Q-1 97(1-
31 ...............
611, 41
ac
..........................................
3 2
42
..... ........ 41
...........
33 ........ ........ 44
...... .......
34
•35 CIO DC1vf REALTY TRUST PEABODY MA 01960• 45 155 0299 0070 BOSTON STREET 92 FLYNN JOHN y SONS INC P 0 BOX 4488 46047
36 c;Al FM MA Q-1��70 48
37 11...... .......... ...... .......... ......
•
49
...............
...........
36 ........... .
50
51
%
..........
....... 22
40 53
41 54
55
42 56
43 I�..........
...... 57
51
. .........
4 4a.
45
46 61
•47 :2
3
48 64
49 65
• e..........
..... 66
........ . .....
50,
•
..........
67
51 Its
52 69
53
71
54 72
55 E 7E
73
41�,: CA
56 74
75
7 17�
IN
n I HEREBY CERTIFY THIS PLAN CONFORMS
TO THE RULES AND REGULA TIONS OF THE
REGISTERS OF DEEDS OF THE COMMON-
°5 WEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS.
�� �ti IFA✓cam Sl
LOCUS MAP
FOR REGISTRY OF DEEDS USE MIL Y
STREET
PUTNAM m-
- - - - - - �SF'% W
65 '01 on
LOT I �11 III
w 12, 826-+ SF.
NI APPROVAL UNDER THE SUBDIVISION
PARKING SPACES `D �'1 7 e / / I CONTROL LAW NOT REQUIRED
DEPICTED SALEM PLANNING BOARD
ARE PROPOSED . o .n
9 I A • RALPH
CYR
S 81932 ' 20" E
29 . 70
-- I 24' 15z I 3 — -- -- - ----
I I ' c _
p w I 2 o I PROPOSED o N
Qz
t I_ o N -` -
~o I 3 2 M rn GA
RAGE 0
uj
II -
cD DATE
o
J :� rn I 4 I I I I 1
r- I-0 -
1- I
5
I y
LOT A
I I
4285! SF. 14 15 6 I I
Cl
S 80039'25' E —r_ BOSTON STREET
w 7. 79 REAL TY TRUST
M EXISTING
to U i
' ' DWELLING
EXISTING
z DWELLING
s . z
I No . 75
No . 73
71 . 98
38.00
N 82.04'42' W N 82909 14" W
THIS PLAN IS BASED ON THE REFERENCED PLANS, DEEDS SUBDIVISION
AND THE RESUL IS OF A FIELD SURVEY AS OF THIS DA TE.
NO CFRTIFICATION IS INTENDED AS TO PROPERTY TITLE BOOS TONPLAN OF LAND
OR AS TO 77-IE EXISTENCE OF UNWRITTEN OR UNRECORDED STREET
EASEMENTS LOCATED IN
SALEM , MASS .-
PREPARED BY
EASTERN LAND SURVEY ASSOCIATES, INC.
RECORD OWNER: DEAN T. BOUCHER & KIM E. DOWNEY CHRISTOPHER R. MELLO, PLS
DEED REFERENCE: BOOK 8518 PAGE 232
104 i-DWELL ST. PEABODY, MA. 01960
- ; �� �' (508) 531 -8121 �
SCALE: 1 " = 20'
APRIL 4, 1994
PLAN REFERENCE: PLAN 257 OF 1947
PLAN 387 OF 947
PREPARED FOR
i
ZONING DISTRICT IS R-2 DEAN T. BOU CH ER &
E . D VVI
;ASSESSORS MAP 15 PARCELS 284 AND 291
o io 20 40 so 8( �-- r
`�
_ _ __ _ _ _
__ _ A,f ,:
�---
_I I HEREBY CERTIFY THIS PLAN CONFORMS
_L\I TO THE RULES AND REGULA TIONS OF THE
REGISTERS OF DEEDS OF THE .COMMON-
�� ' WEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS.
°5'e4 l
LOCUS MAP FOR REGISTRY OF DEEDS USE ONi_ r
STREET
PUTNAM
- -- - r7 -gs°fir r5n w
65 .00
LOT I
�,1 I
w
12,826i SF.
r — r -; APPROVAL UNDER THE SUBDIVISION
I� 7 e �� / I CONTROL LAW NOT REQUIRED
PARKING SPACES �0
DEPICTED �, SALEM PLANNING BOARD
' �'
ARE PROPOSED . o ini �P5 �, I
z
A . RALPH
CYR
S81932 ' 20" E QD ----
-- 29 . 70 .
r 24' 15±
I 3
W t - - I 1 - - - ------- ---- ---
2 c0 I nwN
p
w0 PROPOSED o
I
ti 'nI 2 w gj 'V '
zo
0 OD
GARAGE M
3 ) o
�
(n DA TE
Q N cn
rn r- 4
I � t
O 0 II 5
CIZ
LOT A o ( I
4285' SF. '_9 4 5 6 I ( '
S 80039'2 N E BOSTON STREET
w 7 . 79 REAL TY TRIUST
EXISTING
to to
DWELLING
EXISTING
o ;
z DWELLING
N o . 75
No . 73
T 71 .98
38.00
N 82904 '42' W N 82 '09 ' 14' W
THIS PLAN IS BASED ON THE REFERENCED PLA/vIS, DEEDS SUBDIVISION
AND THE RESUL IS OF A FIELD SUR VFY AS OF THIS DA TE. _
NO CERTIFICATION IS INTENDED AS TO PROPERTY TITLE BOSTON STREET PLAN OF LAND
OR AS TO THE EXISTENCE OF UNWRITTEN OR UNRECORDED L
EASEMENTS.
LOCA TED /N
,SALEM , MASS .
PREPARED BY
EASTERN LAND SURVEY ASSOCIATES, INC.
RECORD OWNER: DEAN T. BOUCHE_R & KIM E. DOWNEY CHRISTOPHER R. MELLO, PLS
104 L.'JWELL ST. PEABODY, MA. 01960
DEED REFERENCE: BOOK 8518 PAGE 232 !f
(508) 531 -8121
SCALE: 1 20' APRIL 4, 1994
PLAN REFERENCE: PLAN 257 OF 1947 � f " =
PLAN 387 SOF 947 PREPARED FOR
DEAN BOUCHER 8c
ZONING DISTRICT IS R-2 E . D O WN E Y
ASSESSORS MAP 15 PARCELS 284 AND 291
0 10 20 40 60 80 I= 9856
i116I__, Li I I_
h
>— I I HEREBY CERTIFY THIS PLAN CONFORMS
TO THE RULES AND REGULATIONS OF THE
°rv�yA e
I � REGISTERS OF DEEDS OF THE COMMON-
WEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS.
LOCUS 1194/' FOR REGISTRY OF DEEDS USE ONLY
STREET
PUTNA'M - __ - - - r 56 W -
65 . 00
LOT I
w
12, 826i SF.
APPROVAL UNDER THE SUBDIVISION
7 l 8 /�� �� I CONTROL LAW NOT REQUIRED
PARKING SPACES I i DEPICTED SALEM PLANNIIL'G BOARD
art`
ARE PROPOSED . o
z 1 w
/ '1 9 A . RALPH _
�,O ( i CYR
S '81 °32 ' 20" E I� i 1
29. 70
Q / 24 15• 3
Om W 2 0 I PROPOSED o
o r 3 W I 2 M ----
Q - -- — GARAGE
a 4 N �; I I DA ;rE
J p) 1�
O oz i 5
LOT A 4 1 5 p 6 .
4285s SF. f I I I
S 80'39 '25E - ,rte BOSTON STREET
w
7. 79 REAL TY TRUST
r)
U-) Ln EXISTING
r
DWELLING
CD % EXISTING
CDz
z DWELLING '
' - N o . 75
N o . 73
71
. 98
38.00
IN 82°04 '42' W N' 82 °09 ' 14" W
THIS PLAN IS BASED ON THE REFERENCED PLANS, DEEDS SUBDIVISION
AND THE RESUL TS OF A FIELD SUR VF K AS OF THIS DA TE.
NO CERTIFICATION IS INTENDED AS TO PROPERTY TITLE BOSTONPLAN OF LAND
OR A3 TO THE EXISTENCE OF UNWRITTEN OR UNRECORDED S TR E E T
FA SEMEN TS. LOCA TED IN
SALEM , MASS .
PREPARED BY
EASTERN LAND SURVEY ASSOCIATES, INC.
RECORD OWNER: DEAN T. BOUCHER & KIM E. DOWNEY CHRISTOPHER R. MELLO, PLS
104 LOWELL ST. PEABODY, MA. 01960
DEED REFERENCE: BOOK 8518 PAGE 232 '� �e (508) 531 -8121
SCALE: 1 " = 20' APRIL 42 1994
PLAN REFERENCE: PLAN 257 OF 1947 1, N
PLAN 387 OF 947 ! PREPARE' FOR _
DEAN T. BOU CH ER Sc
ZONING DISTRICT IS R- 2 E . D O WN EY
ASSESSORS MAP 15 PARCELS 284 AND 291
0 10 20 40 60 80 I 9856