65 BOSTON STREET - LENTORS, GEORGE & GEORGIA - ZBA 65OSTON STREET
j ,5 ,z L �roef2r r � �O
GEORGE & GEORGIA LENTROS
I
RECC:.t!C
Ting of �x1Pm, ? cusEts
' �ttrD of �l} Pul '82 MAY -4 P2 :30
.' p1C:yisY.L4"
CITY CLERK"". OFFICE
SALEb(
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF GEORGE AND GEORGIA LENTROS
FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT FOR 63-63 1/2; 65- 65 1/2 BOSTON ST. AND 4 PROCTOR-ST.
A hearing on this Petition was belld on April 28, 1982 with the following
Board Members present: Douglas Hopper, Chairman, Messrs. Piemonte, Hacker,
Feeherry and Associate Member Luzinski. Notice of the hearing was sent to
abutters and others and a notice of the hearing was properly published in the
Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
The Petitioners have requested a Special Permit to extend a non-conforming
use at the subject property to allow .two small commercial stores at the property
to again be used for commercial purposes.
The property is within an R-2 District; however, the property has for
man been non-conforming.
The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this
request for a Special Permit is Section V B 10, which provides as follows:
Notwl.thstanding anything to the contrary appearing in
this Ordinance, the Board of Appeal may, in accordance
with the procedure and conditions set forth in Section
VfII I' and IR D, grant Special Permits for alterations
and reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and for
changus, enlargement, extension or expansion on non-
confermiug lots, land, st—_tur s. and uses, provided,
however, that such change, estensica, enlargement or
expansion shall not be sustaatially-mare detrimental
than the existing nonconforming use to the neighborhood.
In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit
requests, guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted
upon a finding by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will promote
the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants.
The Board, after considering the evidence at the hearing on this matter,
makes the following findings of fact:
1) The two small stores at the site bad for many years prior to 1975
been used for commercial purposes including uses as a beauty
parlor, a barber shop and a snack bar.
R(' � .
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF GEORGE AND '82 MAY -4 P 2 :30
GEORGIA LENTROS FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT FOR
63-63 1/2, 65-65 1/2 BOSTON ST. AND 4 PROCTOR ST. CITY CLEfI"S FIC
Page 2 SAI-til
2) Because of the s-11 size of the stores, and other restrictions
stated infra in this decision, the Board believes that the use of
the stores fcr cc—=_--tial -)=poses will not adversely affect the
area.
3) No neighborhood opposition was raised to this use.
On the basis of the above findings of fact and on the evidence presented
at the public hearing, the Board of. Appeal finds (i) that the proposed use
of the property will not be, substantially more detrimental than the existing
use to the neighborhood, (ii) that the proposed use of the property will
promote the public health, safety, convenience, and welfare of the City's
inhabitants, and (iii) that the proposed use of the property is in harmony
with the Salem Zoning Ordinance. Accordingly, the Board unanimously approves
._e ---- -_ of a SDecia' ?e==. _o the Petitioners.
The Special Permit is therefore granted in accordance with the following
terms and condi-tions:
1) The I'etitioners may use t1w two Stores at the site for only the
following commercial purplses:
a) Delicatessen stores, Including specialty food stores,
but not to include re ;iilar grocery stores,. cash or carry
dairy Drod•=t stores, or vartety stores.
h)
Drugs-ore, excl_= __=_ =-=-_a4— and notions.
c) Book, stationery or gift shops.
d) Florist shop.
e) Barbershops, not to exceed two (2) chairs.
f) Beauty parlors, not to exceed two (2) Operators.
g) Professional offices, but excluding clinics.
2) Petitioners shall comply with all applicable fire safety codes.
Anthony M. FeEberry, Secretary
COPY OF THIS DECISION AND PLANS HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLAti?TING BOARD AND
CITY CLERK.
Ooo
Q4 o �0_i p "y ZS, 6/
293 oti d° 301
0 Q P� 09 ,' QP O
ss h yti \6 \ p O tiP ,
2010 19� o" /
9 � a �
\ 0 b 2 /
,,0\9U/3 ea N p�^Wy 3J 21Ji s y5 ph 8 >Js� 2
ilo9�s // OO
s p0
> \I
A
2i a °+ s D "v Vis' 32 M25-L74 ePe
s`9i 0 �'Ph 4o T9 P s2? o" 2�p6 0 47'xo +
a �oo6
1 2�00 �so s
dle
SO,S .w vp�
hyO �2'a as s s?>/ X30 ll p 20`65 200 /0)
v 35 s ,s °sem A ZCZ`� � 22 (� sy qs i •• 1
a62� 3 v2 s ST s?� 't3 oy 20 _ 46sF 00 lu c ''
s�90 e gFFT ss `ooh �L ti- n 3ao s S T R£f
O zJ 2g e/ g 320 P
ss S2 Q P3o9 O so e e .,s S/ y o s3i p�s <i
se s3A6 as i QAC
o O
3 s d o0 A AqR
so
1655 006 'sQ0OG0 0� /538 y h kRk/�G
J e 176-11
°�
13,5? a 3BSu :� � � /���\ k
o
S0 324
O '
so $ o <„�e
1.,/ / v / A-
-6445,
+
so O 45�
>0 O
s n s9 009 �� "Q4roo 318
3s/ S T s
3 0 S SQ q i E2 m 306
600 362 si90 QP
v 6',
y y a
-6'Z? 4q.0
s307 30
/�''�`�9�s