Loading...
12 BOSTON STREET - ZBA �. -- - — — — ---- 12 Boston St. R._2 r(, —,� ---- --�---� DPJ Realty Tr.� c� i `y T: Ctg ofttiem, assadjusetts Pattra of Appeal June 23, 1992 Notice is hereby given that as of June 17, 1992 the decision of the Board of Appeal has been filed in the office of the City Clerk to grant the petition of DPJ Realty Trust for a Special Permit to allow 12 Boston St. to be converted from a Sales Office plus one residential unit into two residential units. BOARD OF APPEAL a Brenda M. Sumrall Clerk of the Board Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to section 17 of, the Mass. General Laws, Chapter 808, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to Mass. General Laws, Chapter 808, section 11, the variance c; 6-pedal Permit grcnte' herein sh^_il not tale effect until a copy of the decisich, bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed ar.e no appe:;l has been tiled, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismisse4 or denied is recorded in the South EsseX Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name or the owner of record or . is recorded and noted sn the owner's Certificate of Title. BOARD OF AWEAU y y Chi of !�ittlem, 4assacllus�etts Bottrd of Att�reul C"' 01F 04 CCE SACEy f RK S pr MASS r,E DECISION ON THE PETITION OF DPJ REALTY TRUST FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 12 BOSTON STREET (R-2) A hearing on this petition was held June 3, 1992 with the following Board Members present: Richard Febonio,Acting Chairman; Edward Luzinski, Francis Grealish Jr. , Stephen Touchette and Associate Member Ronald Plante. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioners, owners of the property and represented by John Boris Tr. , are requesting a Special Permit to convert the premises from a sales office plus one dwelling unit into a two family dwelling. The property is located in an R-2 district. The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this request for a Special Permit is Section 5-3(j ) , which provides as follows: Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set forth in Section 8-6 and 9-4, grant Special Permits for alterations and reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and for changes, enlargement, extension or expansion of nonconforming lots, land, structures, and uses, provided, however, that such change, extension, enlargement or expansion shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming use to the neighborhood. In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit requests, guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted upon a finding by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact; 1. There was no opposition to this petition. 2. The property was converted to a two family dwelling by the Board of Appeal June 17, 1971 at the request of the previous owner, Emanuel Distefano. DECISION ON THE PETITION OF DPJ REALTY FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 12 BOSTON STREET, SALEM page two JUN 17 3 o4 FM '32 3. The Board of Appeal ranted the CITY Of $� pp g present owners a Vari�pERK"$'�" h0�.SS 18, 1981 to convert the two family into a mixed use building, t e iWt floor being utilized as a sales office and the second floor an apartment. 4. The economic times makes the use of the property as a two family a more feasible use. 5. Councillor Kevin Harvey spoke in favor. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1. The Special Permit requested can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. 2. The granting of the Special Permit requested will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants and may be granted in harmony with the neighborhood. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the Special Permit requested, subject to the following conditions: 1 . Petitioner shall comply with all City and State statutes, ordinances, codes and regulations. 2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted. 3 . All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety shall be strictly adhered to. 4. A legal building permit is to be obtained. 5. A Certificate of Occupancy is to be obtained. SPECIAL PERMIT GRANTED June 3, 1992 i 7 /j 7- i Ronald G. Plante, Assoc.Member Board of Appeal i DECISION ON THE PETITION OF DPJ REALTY TRUST FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 12 BOSTON STREET, SALEM IN 11 3 ov PH 191 page three CITY OF SALEM MASS CLERK'S OFFICE A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of MGL Chapter 40A. , and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to MGL Chapter 40A. , Section 11, the Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in to South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. Board of Appeal (Citt7 of �&ttlrm, rfflttssttcltus�etts t \" U 7 curd of ,_Appral3 04 P# '52 S o,�>F�r,ESS DECISION ON THE PETITION OF DPJ REALTY TRUST FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 12 BOSTON STREET (R-2) A hearing on this petition was held June 3, 1992 with the following Board Members present: Richard Febonio,Acting Chairman; Edward Luzinski, Francis Grealish Jr. , Stephen Touchette and Associate Member Ronald Plante. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioners, owners of the property and represented by John Boris, Tr. , are requesting a Special Permit to convert the premises from a sales office plus one dwelling unit into a two family dwelling. The property is located in an R-2 district. The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this request for a Special Permit is Section 5-3(j ) , which provides as follows: Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set forth in Section 8-6 and 9-4, grant Special Permits for alterations and reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and for changes, enlargement, extension or expansion of nonconforming lots, land, structures, and uses, provided, however, that such change, extension, enlargement or expansion shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming use to the neighborhood. In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit requests, guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted upon a finding by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact; 1. There was no opposition to this petition. 2. The property was converted to a two family dwelling by the Board of Appeal June 17, 1971 at the request of the previous owner, Emanuel Distefano. DECISION ON THE PETITION OF DPJ REALTY FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 12 BOSTON STREET, SALEM page two Jin+ 17 3 04 PN X32 3. The Board of Appeal ranted the CITY OF pp g present owners a VarigiftERK �UIGSS 18, 1981 to convert the two family into a mixed use building, t e'fl4t floor being utilized as a sales office and the second floor an apartment. 4. The economic times makes the use of the property as a two family a more feasible use. 5. Councillor Kevin Harvey spoke in favor. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1. The Special Permit requested can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. 2. The granting of the Special Permit requested will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants and may be granted in harmony with the neighborhood. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the Special Permit requested, subject to the following conditions: 1. Petitioner shall comply with all City and State statutes, ordinances, codes and regulations. 2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted. 3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety shall be strictly adhered to. 4. A legal building permit is to be obtained. 5. A Certificate of Occupancy is to be obtained. SPECIAL PERMIT GRANTED June 3, 1992 l Ronald G. Plante, Assoc.Member Board of Appeal DECISION ON THE PETITION OF DPJ REALTY TRUST FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 12 BOSTON STREET, SALEM JUN 11 3 04 PM 191 page three CITY OF SALEM. MASS CLERK'S OFFICE A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of MGL Chapter 4OA. , and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to MGL Chapter 4OA. , Section 11, the Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in to South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. Board of Appeal rj (ditty ofJUN ttlem, � ttsstttltus tts nttra of Avf,eul CITY 04 P# 'g1 OLOF ERKSS OcMI ESS DECISION ON THE PETITION OF DPJ REALTY TRUST FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 12 BOSTON STREET (R-2) A hearing on this petition was held June 3, 1992 with the following Board Members present: Richard Febonio,Acting Chairman; Edward Luzinski, Francis Grealish Jr. , Stephen Touchette and Associate Member Ronald Plante. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioners, owners of the property and represented by John Boris, Tr. , are requesting a Special Permit to convert the premises from a sales office plus one dwelling unit into a two family dwelling. The property is located in an R-2 district. The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this request for a Special Permit is Section 5-3(j ) , which provides as follows: Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set forth in Section 8-6 and 9-4, grant Special Permits for alterations and reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and for changes, enlargement, extension or expansion of nonconforming lots, land, structures, and uses, provided, however, that such change, extension, enlargement or expansion shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming use to the neighborhood. In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit requests, guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted upon a finding by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact; 1. There was no opposition to this petition. 2. The property was converted to a two family dwelling by the Board of Appeal June 17, 1971 at the request of the previous owner, Emanuel Distefano. v DECISION ON THE PETITION OF DPJ REALTY FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 12 BOSTON STREET, SALEM page two JUN 17 3 04 F i '9Z TY OF 3. The Board of Appeal C� @pFRK �� pp granted the present owners a Vari SS 18, 1981 to convert the two family into a mixed use building, t e 11NEt floor being utilized as a sales office and the second floor an apartment. 4. The economic times makes the use of the property as a two family a more feasible use. 5. Councillor Kevin Harvey spoke in favor. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1. The Special Permit requested can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. 2. The granting of the Special Permit requested will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants and may be granted in harmony with the neighborhood. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the Special Permit requested, subject to the following conditions: 1 . Petitioner shall comply with all City and State statutes, ordinances, codes and regulations. 2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted. 3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety shall be strictly adhered to. 4 . A legal building permit is to be obtained. 5. A Certificate of Occupancy is to be obtained. SPECIAL PERMIT GRANTED June 3, 1992 Ronald G. Plante, Assoc.Member Board of Appeal DECISION ON THE PETITION OF DPJ REALTY TRUST FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 12 BOSTON STREET, SALEM AN 17 3 04 PM ,92 page three CITY OF SALEM, MASS CLERK'S OFFICE A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of MGL Chapter 40A. , and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to MGL Chapter 40A. , Section 11, the Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in to South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. Board of Appeal DATE OF HEARING Lo PETITIONER2a 2 /Q � LOCATION MOTION: TO GRANT �� SECOND TO DENY SECOND TO RE-HEAR SECOND LEAVE TO WITHDRAW SECOND M CONTINUE SECOND ROLL CALL PRESENT GRANT DENY WITHDRAW RE-HEAR CONTINUE l/ 1 RICHARD FEBONIO FRANCIS GREALISH EDWARD LUZINSKI �- STEPHEN TOUCHETTE ASSOCIATE (MEMBERS RONALD PLANTS 4 A CONDITIONS: i APPEAL CASE NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . M of �ttlem, �ttssar4usEtts %-MMWIMMA) Paurb of ' }"Cai TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS: The Undersigne represent that he is are the owners of a certain parcel of land loc ted at NO. . ��? . . UTllet!• •�T. . • . . • • • • • • • • Street; Zoning District .2< . ; and said parcel is affected by Section(s) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . of the Massachusetts State Building Code. Plans describing the work proposed, have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in accordance with Section IX A. 1 of the Zoning Ordinance. O a r � mo m N o! to J C" h tN T' <1 S Q T_• p. LLJ c s Wma(� W C OCM J N W W Q N The Applicat& forte Permit was denied by the Inspector of Buildings for the following reasons: The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero- gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for the following reasons: /blit vice /Qe9vEsrs i¢ S�+Ec.Ac �E �r fea.� Dr•✓srry �•✓ o.2oE� TO RE(�yVE.eT pfGicE 519eE IWZ) A 7W,0 O�W/L y 40411 V4, 4W NYJj! yam/ 7'96 64%e4 &mmrU 4 KoCl ,✓cr Tb CAWv'&X •/OA07- OF 77-le /"V/Nra .4 .Bess oaF/c6, Du c 7D A ,ee&QdAwrz*no•✓ or THE 6b*1-Y,Vr� oGFicE S/Act /s No &pv1jeED /A( THis 2?zMe-& 4- INOVS eFPaff.Vr To IC E7uRN T/!E UsE M /4 �iG1^ rA.aic�/ d 4>Ew.V6. rid/S iISG� /S iN /f/i9�G'a y W.,rW T/{E b"7,,Ct cT C,4e-2) #,V4 W/ai-,D A107- d e?DGATF Il din T!/E 1,V7r✓T pv Owner. ..TusT. .. . . . . . . . . . Address* . . . . : . • X11, QUO Telephone. . . . . ..... . . . . . . . . .. .. . . .. . . . . . . Petitioner&.PT.It . . .. 72fo'A •• • • • • • • • Address. .�fM... . . . . . . . . . . . .. ... . . .. .. .. Date. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Telephone0. .. . . . . . . .. . . . .. . . . .. . . . By. . . . . .CVY ?� �.. �:�. . . . .. .. Three copies of the application must be filed with the Secretary of he Board of Appeals with a check, for advertising in the amount of. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . four weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals. Check payab a to The Evening News. ,afSulem, � lttt��usefs RECEIVr� Poarb of c� Ptt1 081 NOV 23 P DECISION. ON THE PETITION .OF JOHN BORIS, TRUSTEE OF DPJ REALTY TRUST, e.EQUESPRY CLERK'S OF A VARIANCE FOR 12 BOSTON:STREET _ SALEI INA S-- A hearing on this Petition was held on November 18, 1981 with the following Board Members present: Joseph Piemonte, Acting Chairman, Messrs. Hacker and Feeherry and Associate Member Lusinski. Notices of the hearing were sent to abutters and others and a notice of the hearing was published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. The Petitioner has requested a variance for the property at 12 Boston Street - to utilize the first floor of the property as a sales office. A variance is required because the property is in an R-2 district where the proposed use is prohibited- Withoyt a variance. The Board of Appeals, after consideration of the evidence presented at the public hearing and after viewing the property makes the following findings of fact: 1. The proposed use of the property as a sales office for Essex Office Associates will not have an adverse effect on the surrounding area which although zoned R-2 has numerous non-conforming commercial uses. 2. The proposed use of the property was unopposed by abutters. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Board of Appeals concludes as follows: 1. The property in question is unique because of its location in an area which is surrounded by non-conforming commercial uses. 2. The conditions described above especially affect the property in question but do not generally affect the zoning district in which the building is located. 3. The conditions described above which affect the land in question, but not the zoning district generally cause special financial "hardship to the Petitioner. Restriction on the use of the property for only residential purposes are inappropriate limitations in light of the location of the property. 4. The desired variance may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good. Th=refore, the Board of Zoning Appeals unanimously voted in favor of granting the requested relief. The Board grants a variance to the petitioner on the following conditions: 'IIECISION — JOHN BORIS, TRUSTEE OF DPJ REALTY TRUST RECD+1/r 12 BOSTON STREET Page 2 November 18, 1981 �1 NOV 23 A10 :46 CITY CLERK'S OFFICE SALEI9 N:ns 1. The first floor of the property may be used as a sales office for Essex Office Associates. However, the property may not be used for over-the-counter sales of merchandise. 2. The property may also be used for no more than one residential dwelling unit. bony M. Feeher y, ecret r Y APPEAL FROM THIS DECISION. IF ANY, SHALL BE MADE PUP.SUA T To SE17I93 17 OF THE SASS. GENERAL LA'.'!S. CHAPTER 808. AND S3ALL BE FRES WITHIJ! 20 DAYS AT', THE DATE OF FILING _ OF THIS DECISION 18 THE OFFICE OF TRE CITY CLMN. PU.:SA'!T TO MASS. Mt ERAC LAMS. VAPTE3 E'C. =TIZA 11.THE Y'` ::c::E OC CT-V.L PERMIT GP,;NTED HER'c:N, S!V4LL NOT TAKE EFFECT UN..P.L A COPY C% `.:!: `:. BEA.— THE CERT• FICATION CF 7HS CM CLERX THAT 27 CAS IIAVS P.:.7E'_0 :.- - .• !':E%.' HG ri:E[I FRED. OR THAT, IF SUCH AN APPM HAS SES`I FILE. THAI IT HAS `,'l ....._ •.3 D":!ED IS RECORDED IN THE SOUTH ESSEX P.EGIMY OF DEE03 AND C:JEXM 5,..:: TH_ ".AcdE OF THE OYINER OF RECORD OR IS RECORDED AHO NOTED ON THE ONNER'S CERTNFiCATE OF TITLE 80AR0 OF APPEAL' A COPY OF THIS DECISION AND PLANS HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY C LEGEND N/F j FENCEJOHN MOORE • IROV PIN FND. MAP 25 LOT 141 E ■ MONUMENT FOUND sgy4sf 46 42 " ICE F4-929-5.F. IS L OCA N/F I ASSESSED KA THLEEN V. SEWARO 6' MARY L . SEWARD MAP 25 LOT 125 N/F LQ D MAP 25 LOT 27 ST hh ! 1/2 sragr �4 0 P VINYL SIDED y O !12 m 2 1/2 S7A4Y I Mc Q ALUMINUM 2 s7LWY PO 0 89ror 016 /10 v cz E;YI P7AWING CAN SALE 47.96 59.70' PLAN OF LAA BOS TON S T R E E T D- P. J. I S PLAN WA DEE1. DS AND PLANSSOFREPARED RECORD ANDY REID LA, A TAPE SURVEY. 2. RECORD RNER� 365 CHA THA- DPJ REAL TY TRUST annK Fgeq PArF .9eo Sym � � �° ,• h. \ ,N i a .a c C. o • •e < /tJ' 'q m 90 0 �0 a�5 u� �� +e 51p0 51 � s Q �S qv�/�e �j 't ho G i 21 (z`. Jl% \ \ �CP a ID C3Q S (R 0 0.. 9 • a ,� r « . S. I, 04p w vw Oj ?0 ea ! j- -' t �7 p O MON(-4�lr� � -Pogo A 52� . / .. 55 /> 52 pAq b bW� /�rOtJ . g 1.02 AC v p"a MSO �%W I , qI8 h\ti a� 232/ i V rf E/Y/ �, J a ` l89 b �J 1 4 ` JC `Tyry J943 � _ - � •3200 � M 4 0 h19 �\ Y��i� .+r " '' `� ❑ 34 . : y 3063 E ET n' �, oo STATION E a ? LA1N S til \ 0 91 FO F K Ab. /v 3:i 4405-� rL `C N APPEAL CASE NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ('gi#g of 1�4'aljem' Aassar4usefts Paurb of '4PEA TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS: The Undersigne represent that he is are the owners of a certain parcel of land locAted at NO. . ��Z . . Ct_%TGAl. . T. . . Street; Zoning DistrictJ.Y:.Z. „ and said parcel is affected by Section(s) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . of the Massachusetts State Building Code. Plans describing the work proposed, have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in accordance with Section IX A. 1 of the Zoning Ordinance. n s a. ca ...I �CS'I Vi 41114 ©. W j_ -. C s W W MCl- Cn W Y Occ N W 1 O t� O The AcPDID I i catikii fors Permit was denied by the Inspector of Buildings for the following reasons: The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero- gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for the following reasons: /ETmbVC< 1(7C9UCW's /$ -SfJEGif1L �E�jNrr f�a.t1 Dr'�s.ry r•✓ a.el)e- 0 A-Ct ✓VERT 0-rFice S19CE I V76 A 7WO `9 WIAIV '6W E1.1+'✓G. e) THE &446 6,e4A(iU A W,e/A,'cc 76 CaN✓E'er 14,&- c� rlfE b'uiaDiv6 i.v ro .4 Secs o�FicE, DuE 'TD A PEp�b✓1NrzAnd.✓ or >E r� oGFicE /S NO Lcw6c� �F9vrP6D i�� rHis rS'ui�Di�/G. ?Fftls /�Enric:r�2s oe6_0ve5; 76 4-7vlew rile USG 70 A 1,1 tV rAMi'/ 'r/ii_5 41S,5 /S i v 1144 >avy 401T71 r/fE a/ST,C'icTC�-z, A*,6 iVacc.D W07- ^,eeln 771E /•V17rvr p,c T//E 2Gw�NG ,cE�rneEis/�^'�. oD Owner. Z -0 -r ./ EA�T���z, UsT Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . • �� N` Telephone. . .-�jd00 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Petitioner&f, .AflA ..! TRilsr„ • , , , , , , Address. . �'Me • . . . . . . . . . .. Date. . . . . . . . . . . .I . . . . . . . . Telephone. 1 („3. . . . Q� T.i . By. . . . . . /�U� . .1: �!^?� . . . . . . . . . . . . . Three copies of the application must be filed with the Secretary of the Board of Appeals with a check, for advertising in the amount of. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . four weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals. Check payable to The Evening News. NO.................................... PETITION TO BOARD OF APPEALS LOCATION .................... ........................................... PETITIONER................... ADDRESS............................................... .............................................. CONDII IONS .......................................................... ........................ ....................................... ................................................................ ................................................................. ................................................................. ................................................................. ,PETITION APPROVED.................... ❑ DENIED......................... n . " .............................................. 19......... it".A a Y <a ' RECEIVcr of �Sttlem, ��1�t���cl�us��fs 19 �3aarD of PuI '81 NOV 23 AT DECISION. ON THE PETITION .OF JOHN BORIS, TRUSTEE OF DPJ REALTY TRUST, REQUESMY CLERK'S OFF A VARIANCE FOR 12 BOSTON-STREET - SALEM A hearing on this Petition was held on November 18, 1981 with the following Board Members present: Joseph Piemonte, Acting Chairman, Messrs. Hacker and Feeherry and Associate Member Lusinski. Notices of the hearing were sent to abutters and others and a notice of bhe hearing was published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. The Petitioner has requested a variance for the property at 12 Boston Street to utilize the first floor of the property as a sales office. A variance is required because the property is in an R-2 district where the proposed use is prohibited• Witkwyt a variance. The Board of Appeals, after consideration of the evidence presented at the public hearing and after viewing the property makes the following findings of fact: 1. The proposed use of the property as a sales office for Essex Office Associates will not have an adverse effect on the surrounding area which although zoned R-2 has numerous non-conforming commercial uses. 2. The proposed use of the property was unopposed by abutters. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Board of Appeals concludes as follows: 1. The property in question is unique because of its location in an area which is surrounded by; non-conforming commercial uses. 2. The conditions described above especially affect the property in question but do not generally affect the zoning district in which the building is located. 3. The conditions described above which affect the land in question, but not the zoning district generally cause special financial hardship to the Petitioner. Restriction on the use of the property for only residential purposes are inappropriate limitations in light of the location of the property. 4. The desired variance may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good. - Th=refore, the Board of Zoning Appeals unanimously voted in favor of granting the reVested relief. The Board grants a variance to the petitioner on the following conditions: �."DECISION - JOHN BORIS, TRUSTEE OF DPJ REALTY TRUST REC1 +�I 12 BOSTON STREET - Page 2 November 18, 1981 '81 NOV 23 A10 :46 CITY CLERK'S OFFICE SALEM Nf,S; 1. The first Boor of the property may be used as a sales Office for Essex Office Associates. However, the property may not be used for over-the-counter sales of merchandise. 2. The property may also be used for no more than one residential dwelling unit. bony M. Feeher y, ecret r APPEAL FROM THIS DECISION. IF ANY, SHALL BE MADE PUP.SUMM TO SECTION 17 OF THE MASS. GENERAL LAWS. CHAPTER 808, AND SVIL BE FILED WITHY! 20 DAYS AFTER THE DATE OF FILING . OF THIS DECIS!ON IN THE D F!CE OF THE CITY CL.-MX. PUDSA.'!T TO !.ASS. GIN SEW LAMI, CHAPI'M E,23. s=nz! It.SPF V^ :k:$E G4 -PMAL PEWAIT GDRNTEJ HERMi. SHALL NOT TALE EFFECT U:'.T.L A COPY V :IZ THE CERT• - FICATION CF THE Mi CLER!L THAT 20 DAYS HAVE E!;.7Si0 .• .- i<i.i HAS 6Z_'1 MED, OR THAT, IF SUCH AN APPEAL HAS BEEN F!LE, THA( IT HASv°": ._..__ •.3 D--',.'!ED IS RECORDED NN THE SOUTH ESSEX RECISTGY OF DE;OS AND U:OE7.E0 7f TE1 TH_ i!A&:E OF THE O'BNER OF RECORD OR IS RECORDED AND NOTED ON THE OWNER'S CERTiFiCATE OF TITLE BOAR4 OF APPEAL; A COPY OF THIS DECISION AND PLANS HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY C • i CITY OF SALEM BOARD OF APPEALS 745-9595 Ext. 381 Will hold a public hearing for all persons int er- C ested in the petition submitted by DPJ REALTY TRUST for a Special Permit to allow 12 BOSTON . ST. (R-2)to be converted from a sales office plus - one dwelling unit into a two dwelling unit building. Said hearing to he held WEDNESDAY,JUNE 3, • 1992,at 7:00 P.M.,ONE SALEM GREEN,2nd floor. • { RICHARD A. BENCAL, Chairman SNS 042 May 20, 27, 1992 i -`-ITY OF BOARD OF SALEM 1 -OITY OF SALEM Will hold a 745-9595 E t.APPEALS r BOARD OF APPEALS est Will in the public hearing for all - 745-9595 Ext. 381 TRUST for petition submitted by persons inter- Will hold a public hearing for all persons inter- Ora a Special Per J REAL�•Y - ested in the petition submitted by DPJ REALTY (well to be converted from allow 12 BOSTON TRUST for a Special Permit to allow 12 BOSTON Onedwelling unitintoa two dwelllnales ofrc.e plus ST. (R-2)to be converted from a sales office plus hear ing to be held gunitb one dwelling unit into a two dwelling unit building. {I 1992 at 7:00 P•pjng- . ONES LUAI C SUAY JUNE 3 ! ' Said hearing to be held WEDNESDAY, JUNE 3, May 20 27 RICHARD A BL BEEN 2nd❑oor, � 1992,at 7:00 P.M.,ONE SALEM GREEN,2nd floor. 1092 NCAL, Chairman RICHARD A. BENCAL, Chairman t - SN81042 - 1 May 20, 27, 1992 SN81042 APPEAL CASE NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A` (1litg of 'Salem' 'fflttssadjusetts TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS: The Undersigne represent that he is are the owners of a certain parcel of land loc-t� at NO. . . . G • •�7. • • • • • • • • Street; Zoning District/ . ; and said parcel is affected by Section(s) . . . . . . . . . . . . . of the Massachusetts State Building Code. Plans describing the work proposed, have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in accordance with Section IX A. 1 of the Zoning Ordinance. � s N f7 K r / N Q CO Cn P, Uj ya AJ om c -n w - cj4n Q µMu.. � �x ria � to The Application for Permit was denied by the Inspector of Buildings for the following reasons: The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero- gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for the following reasons: �ET/T/e.✓E.e /�E�YlE57'.S /� SfJEGl9L_ �E,�/s//T j.F'da/ eEi,/SrTj/ /n/ d�',O/r.�' O 1� 66,YyE.e7- 0,rrIcE Sf'9cc //✓7� A 'T�iJd `iyMi<y �CyEIu+NG. (fin/ NIJy. /8/�8/ 7H6' gm,<4 gew v/f-6 4 V4,C, ,cE 76 C41"'97- 1,11 771,r 6�[!/�Di Nb /�✓ /1 S/I�cs OGF/cE • DUE 7D A ,P6p�6A✓rzRnd,✓ of TI>6 CCr++��3Nyj OOCW _ 1,4C /s No 1"6., Pp,4, 4D /a r//is /IeP716W S k6-0,VZ'57- 76 lC 0VIeW 7//E USG- 70 A XaX A*W,1-y clsie /S IN f//�Q•°lo�✓� 4017-f 7-#,5 �/5 rt'l cT C�'2� NN'9 L 4,e'-LI NOT d 6rAe"YF �_e"' 7;Ye /A(7T"YT 610- Tiff �gNiNG �PE�U/RE/u��'/S. Owner. MJ. TusT. . . . . . . . . Address. Telephone. . ??6O 0. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Petitionerh.PY.1LpEh'�Y TXusr-, . . . . . . . . S`�4 Address. . (. . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Date. . . . . . . . . Telephone .. .�.�. . . . . I . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . By. . . ' . 11�"^ w71!*!). �.�!����(. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Three copies of the application must be filed with the Secretary of the Board of Appeals with a check, for advertising in the amount of. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . four weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals. Check payable to The Evening News. « Al NO.................................._ PETITION'1'O BOARD OF APPEALS I ACATION PETITIONVR,...._- 1 ADDRIiSS............... jr . -............................... ,r CONDI I lo%S q y A ....................... __ ___ -4 a5 sN 'ETITION APPROVED.................... � a k"''; _ ......................._.......... 19......... Gii ai sAY"C cY R r. . �♦ • _ Xl y, Me. � 1 «< � �\\t` r'h -51yi .iei Sh (_. �i 3,1 _ M J e li ,a f�if of �zfem, � ttt tf�usefts RECEIVEr ' Poarb of 'Aplea1 81 NOV 23 A10 DECISION. ON THE PETITION .OF JOHN BORIS, TRUSTEE OF DPJ REALTY TRUST, P.EQUESMY: CLERIt'$ CFF A VARIANCE FOR 12 BOSTON_STREET - SALEM "AS-3, T i A hearing on this Petition was held on November 18, 1981 with the following Board Members present: Joseph Piemonte, Acting Chairman, Messrs. Hacker and Feeherry and Associate Member Lusinski. Notices of the hearing were sent to abutters and others and a notice of bhe hearing was published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. The Petitioner has requested a variance for the property at 12 Boston Street to utilize the first floor of the property as a sales office. A variance is required because the property is in an R-2 district where the proposed use is prohibited- uithoyt - a variance. The Board of Appeals, after consideration of the evidence presented at the public hearing and after viewing the property makes the following findings of fact: 1. The proposed use of the property as a sales office for Essex Office Associates will not have an adverse effect on the surrounding area which although zoned R-2 has numerous non-conforming commercial uses. 2. The proposed use of the property was unopposed by abutters. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Board of Appeals concludes as follows: 1. The property in question is unique because of its location in an area which is surrounded by non-conforming commercial uses. 2. The conditions described above especially affect the property in question but do not generally affect the zoning district in which the building is located. 3. The conditions described above which affect the land in question, but not the zoning district generally cause special financial hardship to the Petitioner. Restriction. on the use of the property for only residential purposes are inappropriate limitations in light of the location of the property. 4. The desired variance may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good. Therefore, the Board of Zoning Appeals unanimously voted in favor of granting the regpested relief. The Board grants a variance to the petitioner on the following conditions: r, DECISION - JOHN BORIS, TRUSTEE OF DPJ REALTY TRUST RECc��/ _t 12 BOSTON STREET - Page 2 November 18, 1981 � NOV 23 A10 :46 CITY CLERK's OFFICE SALEM N:f,s 1. The first Boor of. the property may be used as a sales office for Essex Office Associates. However, the property may not be used for over-the-counter sales of merchandise. 2. The property may also be used for no more than one residential dwelling unit.' ;4 bony M. Feeher y, ecret r APPEAL FROM THIS DECISION, IF NNY, SHALL BE MADE PURSUA T TO SECTION 17 OF THE VASS. , GEREP.AL LAWS. CHAPTER 808, AND S'NALL BE RLEO WITHiTI 20 DAYS A.'-TER THE DATE OF FILING OF THIS DECISION 18 THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CL RX. PURSA.':T TO M..ASS. M; EM LAMS. C9%.PT°3 Ell Su M-A 11.THE V''`,Ll!:7E Oz! CCSCIAL PERMIT GGANTD HER,IN-• SHALL NGT TAKE EFFECT VMA COPY OF -:i= ':.:_ �K`i !; THE CERT. - FICATIO:1 CF THE CI'iY CLERIL THAT 20 DAYS HAV, E!,% i=O '<.. , .. - H:\: r, :.1 FILED. . OR THAT, IF SUCH AN APPEAL H,.S BEEN FRE. THAT IT HAS CM': C:_ .`_'.__ '.3 DZ':!ED IS RECORDED IN THE SOUTH ESSEX P."cGISTGY OF D'c0S AND UiOD..,O 51:TE: TH EA.'E OF THE OWNER OF RECORD OR IS RECORDED AND NOTED ON THE OWNER'S CERTIFICATE OF TITLE. BOAR4 OF APPEAL A COPY OF THIS DECISION AND PLANS HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY C _ _ RECEItiJE� Qlitu of gnlem, 4fassadjusetts Puttrb of Appeal *81 NOV 23 AI0 yaiyni ^y" DECISION. ON THE PETITION .OF JOHN BORIS, TRUSTEE OF DPJ REALTY TRUST, REQUEsOW CL`ERIC'S OFF A VARIANCE FOR 12 BOSTON-STREET - SALEI-I ;a;,S; A hearing on this Petition was held on November 18, 1981 with the following Board Members present: Joseph Piemonte, Acting Chairman, Messrs. Hacker and Feeherry and Associate Member Lusinski. Notices of the hearing were sent to abutters and others and a notice of bhe hearing was published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. The Petitioner has requested a variance for the property at 12 Boston Street to utilize the first floor of the property as a sales office. A variance is required because the property is in an .R-2 district where the proposed use is prohibited- Wlthoyt - a variance. The Board of Appeals, after consideration of the evidence presented at the public hearing and after viewing the property makes the following findings of fact: 1. The proposed use of the property as a sales office for Essex Office Associates will not have an adverse effect on the surrounding area which although zoned R-2 has numerous non-conforming commercial uses. 2. The proposed use of the property was unopposed by abutters. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Board of Appeals concludes as follows: 1. The property in question is unique because of its location in an area ' which is surrounded by non-conforming commercial uses. 2. The conditions described above especially affect the property in question but do not generally affect the zoning district in which the building is located. 3. The conditions described above which affect the land in question, but not the zoning district generally cause special financial hardship to the Petitioner. Restriction: on the use of the property for only residential purposes are inappropriate limitations in light of the location of the property. 4. The desired variance may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good. Therefore, the Board of Zoning Appeals unanimously voted in favor of granting the requested relief. The Board grants a variance to the petitioner on the following conditions: 4." ' :`DECISION - JOHN BORIS, TRUSTEE OF DPJ REAL1`Y TRUST RECEIVE_" 12 BOSTON STREET Page 2 November 18, 1981 '81 NOV 23 A10 :46 CITY CLERK'S OFFICE SALEM MAS 1. The first f).00r of the property may be used as a sales office for Essex Office Associates. However, the property may not be used for over-the-counter sales of merchandise. {{ 2. The property may also be used for no more than one residential dwelling unit.` t bony M. Feeher y, tecret r APPEAL FROM THIS DECISION, IF AMI. SHALL BE MADE PUP.SUA. TO Su110(1 17 OF THE MASS. , GFNEP.AL LXWS. CHAPTER 808, AND S:i3.LL BE FILED W'ITH:I: 20 DAYS ASTER THE DATE OF FILING OF THIS DECIS!OH IN TrIE OFFICE OF THE CITY CL':.'.;L PURR, TO !PASS. CIN ERM LAMS. CHAPTER ?C. S=13A 11.THE V^ I.c:GE OC a!=CIAL PERM.-IT Gm;N-,tD Humu. 5!V1LL NOT TAKE EFFECT U2:P.L A COPY CF ;KA.'.M., THE CERT- FICATIOP! CF THE CIYi CLERI( TrAT 20 LAYS HAY: F"--_T=0 '+: - '''' � HAS r. it FILED. _ IS OR THAT, IF SUCH AN APPEAL HAS BEE.'! FILE. THAI' R "N HAS C :3 0.fi!"t0 THE OYINER RECORDED IN THE SOUTH ESSEX RECI3TRY OF DEEDS AND INOv.ED 'SiNBE: 7H_ EA14 OF T • OF RECORD OR IS RECORDED A(40 NOTED ON THE OWNER'S CERTiFiCATE OF TITLE BOARD OF APPEAL A COPY OF THIS DECISION AND PLANS HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY C tb ° .. 14 7; - Sym �'a � �'g e• � ` `� /N \ �50 V / pg 4 4909 Q(J �w✓J\ \,�.. w`J 6\9 , `: Jo erg, �,� �. �Q� `'e1 �i .`� 6 6 ^moi ",p Re�ON .$ k k`O(�'�. °°� �-,u.• :: �9.'_" � s `pyo ♦ . °1 i r "r�..� a -;:•, A�� M 1� y9� ` ,- �' .� ,° 4 \fe s ` Qv 9 0 F C� st co n 5 187 6 ° 4KI a> 55 52 o5q m$ a p dO moo° ' o M eAs �8 i.oz Ac ^� OJV , S - �he, 2�2/ .� m o, s (t�'�\� s _ - rya 39?S c _ f `+ _ - n' 32pp ` Z � � yq 1 ��r ° y - p \� ❑ 34 LLu Ucb cc, S� O 1pn^in. �0G p00 73 > STREET cn a FIRE . \ L �PDp ST4TION E o 5 ? A N 1ti o p33 a \Fp b 195 V• Y LEGEND FENCE JOHN MOORE ■ MONUMENT FOUND " /a • IRON PIN FUMAP 25 LOT 141 or RALPH N � WILLIAM -' cgi REID so.?9a?9 Np SUAvLy 6494,9 " I CERTIFY THA T THE DWELL INS 4929 S.F. IS L OCA TED AS HOWN. " N/F ASSESSED R-w KA THL EEN V V. SEWARD R. W. REID P. f. S. MARY L . SEWARD MAP 25 LOT 125 N/F LQ D. P. J. REAL TY TRUST 4j MAP 25 LOT 127 Q h ti� ~ oh VINYLSED �4 0 y d12 m e. 2 1/2 S7n9)' Q ALUMINUM 2 SAY 1 INCH = 20 FEET 20 0 20 40 !S6 BRICK �! NO CZ SALEM, MASS. EXISTING 2 CAR PAWING 47.96' 59.70' PLAN OF LAND PREPARED FOR.' NOTE.: BOSTON STREET D_. P. J. REALTY TRUST . 1. THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED FROM DEEDS AND PLANS OF RECORD AND REID LAND SURVEYORS A TAPE SURVEY. 2. RECORD OWNER, DPJ REALTY TRUST 365 CHA THAM ST. , L YNN, MA 800K 5349 PAGE 349 3. THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED FOR SOARO OF APPEALS USE ONLY. SCALE 1 "=20 ' MAY 7 1992 4. FENCES DO NOT ACCURA TEL Y DEFINE "RR 034" PROPERTY LINES. 92-6 �ADcu !bam VC5 az timoo�, ti �no°o�o a�n tio�am�oDa F O WL E R S T R E E T �or'n—r—a= �Zp�a <a ° a ooamo a ,, aOaA na = ^ago oa Rl to �O n 0 O ti aoolrr ti� n1 82.00. . ro ° ati tia SIA oy� H y tia Z ti CCS Afo51 rb O LEGEND --X FEiVCE IVIF✓OHN MOORS *`iN or r'f,r\ • rAON PIN Fivv. MAP 25 LOT 141 RALPH ■ MONUMENT FOUND s WILLIAM E REID No.n417 :..i OISTSO � �o - SND SUNv4' 6Qgg6F 46 42 " I CERTIFY THA T THE PNEL L ING 9IS LOCA TED AS SHOW N/F ASSESSED q KA THLEEN V. SEWARD R. W. REID P. L . S. 6 MARY L . SEWARD MAP 25 LOT 125 N/F W D.P. J. AEA ., L Tr rausr Lw MAP 25 LOT 127 t !/2 s7Df7Y S 4 0 oP VINYL SIDED y ` 812 m 2 1/2 S7ngr Q ALUMINUM 1 INCH 20 FEET W gq LY 20 0 20 40 f16 -4 ,f10 4 EXISTIM9 2 CAR PAWING SAL EM MASS_ aAFur 47.96' 59.70' PLAN OF LAND PREPARED FOR.' NOTES' BOSTON STREET D. P. J. REALTY TRUST . 1. THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED FROM DEEDS AND PLANS OF RECORD AND REID LAND SURVEYORS A TAPE SURVEY. 2. RECORD OWNER• DP✓ REAL TY TRUST 355 CHATHAM ST. , LYNN, MA BOOK 6349 PAGE 349 3. THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED FOR SCALE 1 ��2O ' MAY 7 1992 BOARD OF APPEALS USE ONLY. — 4. FENCES DO NOT ACCUR4 TEL Y DEFINE "q92 034" PROPERTY LINES. 92-6 0 BOARD OF ASSESSORS CITY HALL. PAGE. 1. 7R • 2 2 3 4 3 IFIEDST ........ 4 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 111AP. 25 LOT. 0126 SUFE: 6 PROPERTY ADDRESS: 01312 BOSTON STREET' 7 a 7 ......... 9 ........... As 10 .................. 9� :12 13 o 11 • 25 0126 0012 BOSTON STREET D P J REALTY TRUST IG BOSTON STREET LI/ �4 12 BOOTU fi�uhj A V*M A I A C140'7n 1: ............ 17 j*Rb r 15 0009�,�60STOU. J 9 T" P, 18 At- 19 ................ SO R I,S J Of!N A' R ...... 15 ..VM� MA` 15 Vf ............ ...... 20 16 SEWARD MARY L SALEM MA 01970 21 17 22 • 25 0127 0010 BOSTON STREET 1) F2 J REALTY TRUST 10 BOSTON ST 18 24 —TR 15 9 1 T BOSTON STREET TC REALTY TY, 26 20 27 11 IS ...... -E-M 21 NA ........... ......... p ....... x 4i 22 NADEAU G A INADEAU T 11 TRS LYNN MA 01904 29 23 30 • 25 0140 0012 FOWLER STREET LYNCH MARY E 12 FOWLER ST 31 • 24 32 25 ............ 25",01 4e I RE'�JOHN%Jl� ?l' ........ ........ T3 ........ 34 26 .........%,_, ...... ....... 3 CATHS RINE: t1, -EMl,3 50 27 ...... 36 28 i7 29 3 1: 0 30 40 31 41 ..... .. .......... ........... 2 32 ....... ...... 4 ................. ...... ............ ......... ...... ....... 43 33 .. ..... ....... ..... ......... ........ .... ...... 44 34 Ts 0 35 460 47 36 48 37 ...... 49 38 .. .... %,%,111,�'..=e................ 0 ............ ................ 39 ................ ...... ...... ...................... 52 40 53 •41 54 0 55 42 56 43 57 5: 4 ..........I.I .....I..... 5 601 4 ..I..... ..... 46 61 •47 62 63 48 64 49 . ......... 55 6 0 SO 68 52 69 •53 709 71 54 1721 15 `73 • lQARoM��': 5 I% 1,. 1:, R 75 74 6 CHIEF;A5SF54O �71 1 11 1 7