9 SALTONSTALL PARKWAY - BUILDING JACKET 1
S��L-r'ons-I-�ll
L,�...�.
0
art°ELEe� r e' FIELD COPY
qN !° CITY OF SALEM BUILDING
SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 PERMIT
C
y L- DATE Nov. 9r 1 92 PERMIT NO. 526-92
J
APPLICANT anet BUrba ADDRESS � a N..
BC{/gT }}te�r(��pFT�'��T(TT�M��O'!.I ISTP[I11 - ICryOO.TT�"S LIC.CNSE`
PERMIT TO AWITION (_I STORY ✓ES.......A.ARi NUMBER OF S.AYO
-OWELLING UNITS
,IT.PE Of IMPROVEMEN71 N0. IP OPOSEO USO
AT ILOCATiCHI 9 Saltwall Leve Ward 6 ZONINDISTRG R
IN0.1 ISTAEETI
BETWEC'. AND
ICPOSa STRECtI (CROSS"STPEETI
LOT
SUBDIVISION LOT BLOCK SIZE
BUILDING 15 ]'0 BE ET, w,-1
LONG BY FT. IN HEIGHT AND SHALL CONFORM IN CONSTRUCTION
TO TYPE USE GRO BASEMENT WALLS OR POUNDAT ION
/y�T,�pIY��E/tCC1A �E' SE�S� ETf/F ITVPEI
REMARKS: NAYSMt A 1SEAG ADWDIF
FOR PEF2MIT TO OCCLWY 745-9595
AREA OR oO �V PERMIT
VOLUME ESTIMATED C05T S_l..000R OV PEE $ 113:00-
T i {CVSIC.SOVARC CEETI
OWNER 3anot L. Na"ba ...
AnDRE55 9 Sal+--vml l Tanen Salem.MA - David J. Harris
ASSISTANT INSPECTOR OF BUILDINGS
INSPECTION RECORD
ORI[ woT[ POCONGS5 - CRITICISM$ •Mo 09une14f iws►icro•
�
`
~
/��^� I ��` / l�� L^ ff
������ U� ��������, ����%����I[��]�����s
^, ' `
OCT | 1 � � I7
w�� �� u �? . � oc -Bparb_ of A��°J
' ^
CL[|<�`� �� �� �
DECISION ON THE ION OF JANET L. RUBB& FOR VARIANCE AT
& hearing on this petition was held September 30, 1992 with the following
Board Members present: Richard 8eucal, Chairman; Richard Febooio` Francis
Srealiub` and Stephen Toocbette. Notice of the hearing was sent to
abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properlv published in
the Salem E:euinA 0*wx in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws
Chapter 40A.
Petitioner, owner of the yropert?, is requesting variance from the rear
setback requirement to allow the construction of an addition. The property
is located in a residential single family district.
The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon u finding by this
Board that:
l . Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the
land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting
other lands, buildings and structures involved.
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the %noiog Ordinance would
involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner.
]. Desirable relief may he granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogutio,g from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented
at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings
of fact:
l. There was no opposition to the petition.
2. There were other homes in the neighborhood of similar size and
construction.
3. Placing the addition as proposed is the most feasible location.
4. Granting of this petition would eubuuca the quality of life for the
petitioners.
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF JANET L. BURBA FOR
A VARIANCE AT 9 SALT WALL LANE. SALEM
page t%;o
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented
at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1 . Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property
but not the district in general.
2. `iteral enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would
involve substantial hardship to the petitioner.
3 . Desirable relief can be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 4-0, to grant the
variance requested, subject to the following conditions :
1 . retitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes . ordinances,
_odes _nd regulations .
=.11 construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions
submitted and by legal building permit.
3 . Petitioner shall comply with all requirements of the Salem Fire
Department relative to smoke and fire safety.
4 . retitioner shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy.
5. Exterior finishes shall be in harmony with the existing structure.
VARIANCE GRANTED
September 30, 1992
w Richard Febonio, Vice Chairman
_ Board of Appeal
N
� n
w
y J
� � U
O
U
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF JANET L. BURBA
FOR VARIANCE AT 9 SALT WALL LANE. SALEM
page three
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED b'ITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY
CLERK
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of
the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20
days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City
Clerk. Pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11, the
Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a
copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20
days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has
been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South
Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record
or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title.
Board of Appeal
ti
N
o -
CV)
oLU
�J
ti r�U
U