The URL can be used to link to this page

24 WINTER STREET - DISTRICT FILES �a Salem Historical Commission 120 WASHINGTON STREET,SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 (978)619-5685 FAX(978)740-0404 CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS It is hereby certified that the Salem Historical Commission has determined that the proposed: ❑ Construction ❑ Moving ❑ Reconstruction El Alteration ❑ Demolition ❑ Painting ❑ Signage ❑ Other work as described below will be appropriate to the preservation of said Historic District, as per the requirements set forth in the Historic District's Act (M.G.L. Ch. 40C) and the Salem Historic Districts Ordinance. District: Washington Square Address of Property: 24 Winter Street Name of Record Owner: Peter N. Lutts Description of Work Proposed: Install new roof deck on rear ell per plans prepared by Seger Architects,Inc.dated 3/21/17. Upon completion of work,please notify Historical Commission staff as final sign-off is required to document compliance with this Certificate and approved plans. NOTE.Request to change paint colors is continued to the next Commission meeting on April 19, 2017. Dated: Apri16, 2017 SALEM HISTORICAL COMMISSION By: '� � The homeowner has the option not to commence the work(unless it relates to resolving an outstanding violation). All work commenced must be completed within one year from this date unless otherwise indicated. THIS IS NOT A BUILDING PERMIT. Please be sure to obtain the appropriate permits from the Inspector of Buildings (or any other necessary permits or approvals)prior to commencing work. Date Stamp tri , K-)ti „t f , t,, ,,, It t,1 ForOFtice se my PIT Cup APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Pursuant to the Historic District's Act (M.G.L. Chapter 40C) and the Salem Historical Commission Ordinance, application is hereby made for issuance of a Certificate of Appropriateness for: ❑✓ New Construction ❑ Moving ❑ Reconstruction ✓❑ Alteration ❑ Demolition ❑ Painting ❑ Sign ❑ Other District: ❑Derby Street []Lafayette Street wlcIntire ✓❑Washington Square Address of Property: 24 Winter Street,Salem MA 01970 Name of Record Owner(s): Peter N.Lutts Owner Mailing Address: 24 Winter Street,Salem MA 01970 Description of Work Proposed Please type orprint clearly. Attach additional sheets, as necessary. The scope of work on the project shall include the following: Preparation of existing membrane roof to receive proposed 14'-0" x 16'-6" Roof Deck Structure with 3/4" Iron Bar and 4"x4" Wood Post Railing at a height of approximately 4'-8" above existing finished roof elevation. The proposed structure will be predominately viewed from the rear of the structure on the West elevation facing Oliver Street,with minor elements being seen from the side on the East elevation facing Winter Street. Minor alterations to the South and West Facades will occur where the proposed new deck ties structurally into the existing facade of the building. A secondary request of updating the existing trim work around the perimeter of the structure by painting it white is also being made as part of this application. Note: This application is a re-submittal from the December 2016 Historical Commission hearing where zoning board approval was requested. As of 3/15/17 the Zoning Board has issued approval. Name of Applicant: Dan Rieciarelli ❑Owner❑Contractor[DI'enant❑✓ Other:Architect Signature: Date: Tel. #: 978-744-0208 E-mail Address: dricciarelli@segerarchitects.com Certificate will be mailed to the owner unless otherwise indicated here: Certificate should be mailed to: Name Peter Lung Mailing address:24 Winter Street City:Salem State:MA Zip: 01970 ATTACHED DOCUMENTATION An application will not be considered complete unless all work items are thoroughly describedand the application includes all informatiomneeded for the Commission to make a determination. Failure to.submit a complete application may result in a continuation to a future meeting Recommended information includes: Photos of existing conditions, taken from all public ways Site plan showing location of improvements Elevation drawings of-the existing conditions and-proposed improvements Drawings of details and other special conditions,including profiles Description,photographs, and/or catalog cuts ofproposed-mateiials (please bring to-the meeting product samples,if appropriate) Dimensions(i.e. height of fence, size of pickets and posts,etc.) Paint color samples, if applicable (no less than 2.,x2„) Location and size of all mechanical equipment, such as transformers, HVAC equipment, electrical service and meters, and proposed screening Y �.� �• � _ / �� :� � � �.. 4 � moo. � � .' • • j4 1 - UP Jt 1. • • o • • • • • ' • • • ^ • 3 U E z E x w ci) o 0 Existing Roof Access Door Existing Adjacent Roof o SCU N/A SCA NIA U N E O a � � N N Existing View of Oliver Street Existing Roof Edge Condition w SCWA SCUE NIA HISTORICAL COMMISSION RESUBMISSION 3/21/2017 „,��!' Qarr�ws •i TOP FFAGO vr -.._. . - ' I 1 FLAGIF FFAC I <1,',i .III LOW FLAG ✓ye: Height Verification Mock-Up View From Side Yard SCALE IVA �L WA CA View From Across Winter Street View From e i u�� l �` ,; �'”; ►� ��'air .-,- .•.was — � {'.;�,r1a3.=_ Oliver Updated 4/512017 HISTORICAL COMMISSION RESUBMISSION l z E z 8 c 13 w v4 w O O G 0 Proposed View from Winter Street Federal Style Iron Railing 0 SCALE: N/A SCALE: N/A 4'x4' WOOD y ," SUPPORT POSTS q c AT 8'-0'O.C. AT 44' HIGH v " 3/4' IRON o E #(f r l RAILING AT 4' o v i t27'-4" ❑,C. BETWEEN a. c ABOVE AVERAGE WOOD SUPPORT g GRADE POSTS g S I RUC I URLll Le WOOD FINISH DECK ±2,5t23'-10.. Irl ABOVE AVERAGE EXIST SLOPED GRADE ROOF t23'-0" TOP OF EXIST = ROOF = - 5 . Proposed View from Oliver Street Iron Railing Detail SCALE: N/A SCALE: 1/Y - 1'-0' Q HISTORICAL COMMISSION RESUBMISSION 3/21/2017 XIST. SLOPED SLATE ROOF Ill! IJ_ll z EXIST. SLOPED EPDM EMBRANE ROOF w F v� a I I IIIIIII O a 0 14' N S i a EXISTING BRICK CHIMNEY RAISED PEDESTAL II II II II SYSTEM WITH IPE J EXIST. SLOPED SKYLGHT F WOOD 2' X 2' DECKING RAISED REQUIRED I I I�1 0 i Y i u v A � E 0 v = a a � v iv � Q Y Y 8' + OR - MIR I_ 1 — III Proposed Roof Deck Plan FULL HEIGHT DOOR ELEVATED N SCALE: 11r - P-0' OFF FLOOR Q HISTORICAL COMMISSION RESUBMISSION 3/21/2017 z � $ c - .� - > € JX 0 14 <�.. Proposed View from Winter Street Proposed View from Oliver Street a SCALE: N/A SCALE: N/A Existing Trim work to Remain - Repaint White E � L . r C M Q HISTORICAL COMMISSION RESUBMISSION 3/21/2017 z z ��.. t27-3" W " ABOVE AVERAGE N GRADE J T- � � m W yo 2 rn 12 n Oliver Street Elevation SCALE: 114 1,-e r rn 0 X u v u Q c E a v � a 4� u N y y c ° Y a t21'-3' N ABOVE AVERAGE GRADE N p I I � M F� 8 / East Elevation SCALE: 11r . 11-0' Updated 4/5/2017 Q HISTORICAL COMMISSION RESUBMISSION 3/21/2017 till • -\ / ��'r �•� "1 I fid. '�� •. �� !� %� � ! �� P,�� F � Y ' ft- 1 �! SoIL � ■ _. ' q - '�'� - .v'�r7 3 P. .x + 3' j.. i f,�G•u��? � 'S�`� ?rte t - - - ! - -.:_,y +% %�,a3 `'.et _ - i. ,�?.[:-.� :•� i.. `�.'TM'y=s'?l a,k r-_:sJ1 tea . , � r' __ •.. d- ` \ _ _ .� ;._ , C _ _ _ � ,. '�~ :. ---_ -. r .y1�' '�� - � ._ _. �-"� � �� y: `_ n A -- �' �� i ///!/� I ,� ,. -�s alp �: � � ' /. ►��►' i� � � . i � ,�� , :� _, _ � � 1 �� , ; ,, .�r�rra �;' I i� - � �-- i ;;„��, .y. ,..t _ fel � !.. 4 CITY OF SALEM ASSESSOR'S CERTIFICATION OF ABUTTERS AND "PARTIES IN INTEREST" BOARD/COMMISSION: Historical Commission PROJECT SITE: 24 Winter St {35-0083-0} DESCRIPTION OF REQUIREMENT: Applicant Abutters to abutter Across the street&their abutters I X I Assessor's Certification on Applications to the SALEM HISTORICAL COMMISSION for Certificates of Appropriateness or Hardship This is to certify that the time of the last assessment for taxation made by the City of Salem, the names and addresses of those listed on the attached sheets are owners of land abutting upon the land described abov as the project site, or are owners deemed to be materially effected (as defined by M aehusetts General Law Chapter 40 Q. Assessor's Signatur : Date: Number of initiated pages attached: Once Certified,Return to: Department of Planning and Community Development 60 19 18 14 l//15 15117 16 16 17 P�S�� 4 34 I � ern 1641, i o �i8" ✓� , 2 a�,.b 23 18 15 h 20 9;: �S PJB „m v.•. 155 30cb • 33 17 28 X159 31 26 29 13 12 'P X24 1'2a =gym: 42 40 27 9101./2 9 a 25 0 �Ir 10 c�� 37 o, 23 c9 g �,p 8 � F m v34 21 6 s 7 `�� OA 0 30 19 -P 16 2 17 F� m 15 �.. 26 \ 13 1A 22 29 18 o iJn m" NMW w 1]1182018 at M:M AM V Salem Historical Commission 120 WASHINGTON STREET, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 (978)619-5685 FAX (978)740-0404 NOTICE OF HEARING The Salem Historical Commission will give a public hearing to all persons interested in the application of: Peter N. Lutts on the property at: 24 Winter Street concerning: Installation of roof deck and paint colors Date of Hearing: April 5, 2017 Time of Hearing: 7:00p.m. Location of Hearing: 120 Washington Street, 3id Floor Conference Room By Order of the Salem Historical Commission Patti Kelleher Community Development Planner To view the entire meeting agenda which is posted 5-7 days before the meeting, please visit http://www.salem.com/Pa2es/SalemMA HistoricalA2endas/ Persons with special needs should contact the Clerk of the Commission at 978-619-5685 to arrange for reasonable accommodation. Please allow ample time for us to arrange.for your request. Parcel ID:35-0083-0 Parcel ID:35-0069-0 Parcel ID:35-0070-0 LUTTS PETER N HARRINGTON FAMILY TRUST MAHER SEAN PATRICK 24 WINTER STREET HARRINGTON 21 WINTER STREET SALEM,MA 01970 19 WINTER STREET SALEM,MA 01970 SALEM, MA 01970 Parcel ID:35-0071-0 Parcel ID:35-0081-0 Parcel ID:35-0082-0 FACCOY HARRY G CHAYET NEIL L GADDIPATI KRISHNA MCCOY FRANCOISE B CHAYET MARTHA WHEELER-GADDIPATI SARAH 23 WINTER STREET 26 WINTER STREET 241/2 WINTER STREET SALEM, MA 01970 SALEM, MA 01970 SALEM,MA 01970 Parcel ID:35-0084-801 Parcel ID:35-0084-802 Parcel ID:35-0084-803 JAEGER MADELEINE GAVIN MATTHEW D JR vvbtr- A 50«h I'0.(p 22 WINTER STREET U1 22 WINTER STREET U2 fiewp +i e"t" SALEM, MA 01970 SALEM,MA 01971 22 WINTER ST U3 Lh s A'o phew SALEM, MA 01970 Parcel ID:35-0084-804 Parcel ID:35-0084-805 Parcel ID:35-0084-806 LAMPROS CHARLES A _ rO x i L2 GIACOVELLI NANCY K LAMPROS JENNIFER M BU9*k%%F6A Daniels, W,skr1 22 WINTER ST U6 22 WINTER ST U4 22 WINTER ST U5 SALEM,MA 01970 SALEM, MA 01970 SALEM, MA 01970 Parcel ID:35-0085-0 Parcel ID:35-0086-0 Parcel ID:35-0096-0 KENSLEA TIMOTHY CHARNIGO MICHAEL N BLUME DONNA 20 WINTER STREET CHARNIGO JEANNE B PRIOR JOYCE SALEM, MA 01970 18 WINTER ST 12 OLIVER STREET SALEM, MA 01970 SALEM,MA 01970 Parcel ID:35-0097-0 Parcel ID:35-0098-0 Parcel ID:35-0110-0 GHIRARDINI PETER SHERMAN BENJAMIN PARGA RAMON JR GHIRARDINI LAURA HACKETTJAYNE F 5OLIVER ST 9 FARRAGOT ROAD 6 OLIVER ST SALEM, MA 01970 SWAMPSCOTT, MA 01907 SALEM, MA 01970 Parcel ID:35-0111-0 Parcel ID:35-0112-0 Parcel ID:35-0597-0 DEFRANCO SALVATORE T MOORE DONALD W DITROIA RAYMOND D MARY V 155 FORT AVENUE NANCY L 7 OLIVER ST SALEM, MA 01970 8 OLIVER ST SALEM, MA 01970 SALEM,MA 01970 Massachusetts Cultural Resource Information System Scanned Record Cover Page Inventory No: SAL.2319 Historic Name: Bertram,Capt.John House Common Name: Jewett,John-Hale,Henry A.House - Address: 24 Winter Std - Cityrrown: Salem Village/Neighborhood: Salem Common Local No: 35-83 Year Constructed: 1842 Architect(s): Architectural Style(s): Greek Revival Use(s): Doctor Or Dentist Office;Single Family Dwelling House Significance: Architecture;Commerce:Health Medicine SAL.FN:Winter Street Area Area(s): SAL.HW:Salem Common Historic District SAL.HX:Washington Square Historic District Designation(s): Nat'l Register District(05/12/1976);Local Historic District (09/26/1977) Roof:Slate Building Materials(s): Wali:Brick;Brown Stone;Granite;Wood;Stone,Cut Foundation:Granite;Stone,Cut;Stone,Uncut The Massachusetts Historical Commission(MHC)has converted this paper record to digital format as part of ongoing projects to scan records of the Inventory of Historic Assets of the Commonwealth and National Register of Historic Places nominations for Massachusetts. Efforts are ongoing and not all inventory or National Register records related to this resource may be available in digital format at this time. The MACRIS database and scanned files are highly dynamic;new information is added daily and both database records and related scanned files may be updated as new information is incorporated into MHC files. Users should note that there may be a considerable lag time between the receipt of new or updated records by MHC and the appearance of related information in MACRIS. Users should also note that not all source materials for the MACRIS database are made available as scanned images. Users may consult the records,files and maps available in MHC's public research area at its offices at the State Archives Building, 220 Morrissey Boulevard, Boston, open M-F, 9-5. Users of this digital material acknowledge that they have read and understood the MACRIS Information and Disclaimer (httD7/lmhc-macris.net/macrFsdisclaimer.htm) Data available via the MACRIS web interface,and associated scanned files are for information purposes only.THE ACT OF CHECKING THIS DATABASE AND ASSOCIATED SCANNED FILES DOES NOT SUBSTITUTE FOR COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE LOCAL,STATE OR FEDERAL LAWS AND REGULATIONS.IF YOU ARE REPRESENTING A DEVELOPER AND/OR A PROPOSED PROJECT THAT WILL REQUIRE A PERMIT,LICENSE OR FUNDING FROM ANY STATE OR FEDERAL AGENCY YOU MUST SUBMIT A PROJECT NOTIFICATION FORM TO MHC FOR MHC'S REVIEW AND COMMENT.You can obtain a copy of a PNF through the MHC web site(www.sec.state.ma.us/mhcl under the subject heading"MHC Forms." Commonwealth of Massachusetts Massachusetts Historical Commission 220 Morrissey Boulevard, Boston, Massachusetts 02125 www.sec.state.ma.us/mhc This file was accessed on: Thursday, March 30,2017 at 6:37: PM FORM B -BUILDING NRDIS 5/12/1976; LHD 9/26/1977 Assessor's number USGS Quad Area(s) Form Number 35-83 Salem HX,HW 2319 r Town Salem Place (neighborhood or village) Salem Common Address 24 Winter Street Historic Name Capt. John Bertram House Uses: Present Residential i Original Residential Date of Construction 1842-3 Source HSI Report ' Style/Form Federal/Greek Revival 8 ' Architect/Builder unknown Exterior Material: lb Foundation Granite OWall/Trim Brick,Wood ° Roof Slate Outbuildings/Secondary Structures `,�. � +° •� '' Q w\ barn 0 c '• ' a_�� 'P { Major Alterations (with dates) c.1900-bay window, , �. ,+ •' ;� original windows replaced with 6/1,arched window in pediment '' d v •' }' Condition good 9 Moved ® no E] yes Date 00 Acreage 5500 SF Recorded by Lisa Mausolf Setting densely built-up 19th century residential Organization Salem Planning Department -NE —net borhood north of the Common Date (month/year) June 1998 ''0Q�Qpp Follow Massachusetts Historical Comm$EP Sa O,�IbAS,alinstractionsforcompletingthisform. MASS. MIST. ( BUILDING FORM (24 Winter Street) ARCHITECTURAL DESCRIPTION Describe architectural features. Evaluate the characteristics of the building in terms of other buildings within the community. A good example of transitional Federal-Greek Revival domestic architecture and one of the few brick houses of its type in Salem,the John Bertram House is a 2 1/2-story,brick dwelling with a gablefront and a sidehall plan. The building rests on a foundation which combines high, smooth granite blocks on the facade with lower, rough-faced blocks on the lesser elevations. It is capped by a slate roof with two tall brick chimneys rising from the comers of the south slope. Set into a paneled embrasure and fronted by granite steps,the recessed, sidehall entrance contains a varnished wooden door with three raised vertical panels set above three shorter panels. The door is framed by fluted Corinthian columnettes with partial sidelights and a semi-elliptical fanlight filled with delicate leaded tracery decorated by quatrefoils. The entrance is capped by a peaked brownstone lintel which rests on two square blocks with guttae. Above the entrance is a late 19th century rectangular oriel window supported by two large brackets with the underside sheathed in headboard. There are two 1/1 windows on the front of the oriel,outlined by horizontal panels below and paired brackets above. Other windows on the building contain an early 20th century 6/1 sash. The windows display rectangular sills and lintels,which are predominantly brownstone. The pediment has projecting eaves with a brick frieze and a recessed triangle set in the pediment. Centered in the gable is an arched opening which appears to date to the early 20th century. Extending behind the main house is a two-story brick wing which is aligned with the north elevation and ends with a single- story clapboarded building. Projecting from the south side of the brick wing is a two-story projection, a single bay wide and two bays deep with a rear bay window and full length 6/6 windows on the front. The projection is fronted by a single-story shed-roofed porch. The house is set directly on the sidewalk with a small yard to the south of the house, enclosed by an iron fence with granite posts. The 5500 SF lot extends west to Oliver Street. Facing Oliver Street is a I I/2-story,gablefront bam/garage, sheathed in clapboards. The building has seen the addition of overhead garage doors. HISTORICAL NARRATIVE Describe the history of the building. Explain its associations with local(or state) history. Include uses of the building and the role(s) the owners/occupants played within the community. According to research previously prepared for Historic Salem,Inc.,this house was constructed for Capt. John Bertram in 1842-3. The lot on which the house stands was part of the estate of Benjamin Cheever,tanner,in the early 1800s. It was sold by Benjamin's daughter,Eliza Ware,to merchant John Bertram in 1842. Bertram subsequently bought two adjoining parcels which were used as a garden area. Bertram is shown as the owner on the 1851 map and continued to occupy the house until 1855 when he moved to his new house on Essex Street(which he later gave to the Salem Public Library). Bertram came to Salem as a young man and later acquired his own fleet of ships. He is remembered as Salem's greatest philanthropist and he was intimately connected to Salem Hospital,the Salem Public Library, Old Men's Home and Home for Aged Women. Bertram sold the Winter Street house to John Jewett in 1855 for$10,000. Jewett began his career as a cabinet maker in Beverly in 1817 and subsequently became a dealer in mahogany,fancy woods, furniture and grain. Jewett died in 1874 and the map of that year lists the owner of the property as the heirs of John Jewett. The property was acquired by Henry A.Hale in 1890. Engaged in the hardware business,Hale also served as president of the Salem Gas Light Company and as a vice president of the Salem Five Cents Savings Bank Mrs. Alice Hale continued to live here until 1931 when it was acquired by Dr. John Adams,a physician, who had his office in his home. In 1967 Mrs. Ruth Adams sold the property to Lester Strock who sold it to David Sheehan and Janet Owens in 1977(King 1978). Recommended for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. If checked,you must attached a completed National Register Criteria Statement form. INVENTORY FORM CONTINUATION SHEET Town Property Address Salem 24 Winter Street Massachusetts Historical Commission Area(s) Form No. Massachusetts Archives Building 220 Morrissey Boulevard HX 23 t9 Boston, Massachusetts 02125 BIBLIOGRAPHY and/or REFERENCES Hopkins,G.M. Atlas of Salem. Massachusetts. Philadelphia: 1874. King, Joyce. "House Report for 24 Winter Street", Prepared for Historic Salem, Inc., 1978. McIntyre,Henry C.E. Map of the City of Salem. Philadelphia: 1851. Reardon, Elizabeth. Salem Historic District Study Committee Investi a¢ tion, 1969. Richards, L.J. Atlas of the City of Salem Massachusetts, 1897. Salem City Directories, 1836-1970. Walker Lithograph and Publishing Company. Atlas of the City of Salem Massachusetts. Boston: 1911. e __ Srr1_. 231 FORM B - BUILDING isIGC In Area no. Form no. MASSACHUSETTS HISTORICAL COMMISSIO\ !` (lffine of the Secret v. ate House Boston ~, Salem ess 24 Winter Street r, 5' R --� ent use residence Y i f ent owner Lester Strock ription: c. 1840 uree S.H.D.S.C.R. ps Greek Revival 4. Map. Draw sketch of building location Architect in relation to nearest cross streets and other buildings. Indicate north. Exterior wall fabric brick Outbuildings (describe)cjarage (former stablelei l 4 I Other features o O " PD si'• _ VA Altered Date 4.11 4 S Moved Date O n � 5. Lot size: h >,10•' one acre or less x Over one acre O D �pf Approximate frontage 48 feet O S1• �o+ Approximate distance of building from street 10 feet O NOT WRITE IN THIS SPACE 6. Recorded by Jacob S. Wolfson USGS Quadrant Organization Salem Historical Commission MHC Photo no. Date May 5May 5, 1��__ (over) 5M-2-75-R061465 "^'•��+' 7. Original owner (if known) Original use residence Subsequent uses (if any) and dates 8. Themes (check as many as applicable) Aboriginal Conservation Recreation Agricultural Education Religion Architectural x Exploration/ Science/ The Arts settlement invention Commerce Industry Social/ Communication Military humanitarian x Community development Political Transportation 9. Historical significance (include explanation of themes checked above) This two-story plus pitch roof, gable-end-to-the-street house is one of the few brick Greek Revival houses in Salem. The original recessed en- trance has been "colonialized" (probably around 1900) , and the bay window above it has also altered the original simplicity of this Greek Revival building. Material in Rosamond deLaittre' s book about John Bertram suggests that this was " the new brick house" to which he moved from #2 Pickman Street before he moved to the house which is now the Public Library. He became Salem' s greatest philanthropist, and his name is connected with many of Salem' s best-known institutions, particularly the Salem Hospital, Public Library, old Men' s Home and Home for Aged Women. He came to Salem as a young man and went to sea for many years before he acquired his own fleet of ships. 10. Bibliography and/or references (such as local histories, deeds, assessor's records, early maps, etc.) Salem Historic District Committee Study Report-Elizabeth K. Reardon The Brownstone Guide Maintenance & Repair Facts for Historic Property Owners v y. ry d R, zh > I New York Landmarks Conservancy Technical Services Center Contents ti . Ory . Acknowledgements is more a consumer's handbook than a technical manual. Rather than a source of step-by-step instructions for repair t materials and techniques, the is designed to help owners of historic properties understand the character of sandstone and the basic causes of its decay. In addition, it provides an introduction to the various methods and materials for sandstone repair and restoration. With this background, building owners can make more informed choices about maintaining and repairing historic brownstone. was funded by a grant from the New York State Council on the Arts. Richard D. Pieper, Ward Dennis, and William J. Higgins consulted on the development of the contents. Alex Herrera, Director of Technical Services, and Erin Tobin. Manager of Grants and Technical Services, shepherded it through to completion. Photography was provided by Ann- Isabel Friedman, Andrea Goldwyn, LYSaltzman Architects, Ken Lustbader,James Mahoney, Richard Pieper, and Erin Tobin. Brownstone as a Building Material "Brownstone" is the common name for a variety Almost as soon as sandstone became prominent as a of brown, red, and pink sandstone widely used as building material, it became known for its tendency building materials from the mid-1800s until the to decay. Unfortunately, Its layered composition and early-1900s. In fact, it was so common that the high porosity means that brownstone deteriorates word became synonymous with "row house." easily. It is especially susceptible to the action of Brownstone is found in buildings as early as the water, salts, freeze-thaw cycling, air pollutants, and sin_ilar factors. In the Northeast, the local climate 1600s, but it truly emerged as a dominant American building material in the mid-1800s,when popular consisting of wet winters with daily temperature taste in literature, art, and architecture embraced a fluctuations has proven to be particularly hard on romantic return to nature. Its rich, earth-toned color the material. Consequently, brownstone presents and variety of surface textures expressed this ideal significant maintenance and repair problems for perfectly. To nineteenth-century builders, the softness many owners of historic brownstone buildings. of brownstone was an ideal quality. The material lent itself perfectly to the rapid carving of moldings. brackets, consoles, bas-relief, pediments, architraves, enframements, and many other architectural devices that decorated roughhouses of this period. ;t During the period of its greatest use, brownstone was central to the look and feel of American jt architecture. It is found not only in row houses +l and individual residences, but also in religious, , industrial, commercial, and public buildings. Brownstone use was most common in the . F Northeast, close to the principal quarries. Brownstone used in nineteenth-century New York City came from quarries in: • Connecticut: Portland, East Haven ' { • New Jersey: Newark, Belleville, and Little Falls v e; • Massachusetts: East Longmeadow ! " • Pennsylvania: Hummelstown • New York: Medina • Michigan • Scotland t Beginning in the late 1860s, however, a construction boom in New York and other eastern cities created 1 mile upon mile of new row houses. Often, the less desirable material was pressed into architectural service and sliced into thin veneer or carved into elaborate facade features. Before embarking on any repairs, the condition of the stone should be surveyed, identifying the symptoms and possible causes of deterioration. Observations regarding the color, pattern, texture, and surface tooling of the brownstone, as well as Inspecting the previous repairs, can be very helpful to a conservator, architect, or contractor. Building owners can do Condition of Brownstone some of this initial investigation, allowing them to better describe the condition of their building: Brownstone has two basic characteristics that Is the stone brown or another color?Has determine its appearance and performance more than one color of stone been used? in buildings: Are there swirls, bands, or veins of color • Composition: Sandstone is made up of grains of within the individual stones? sand and other minerals held together by natural cementing agents. Is the stone surface hard or crumbly, sharp or weathered? • Structure: The minerals that form the stone were deposited into layers, or strata, by water and wind Is the stone carved, rock-faced, or over many centuries. Within the stone, natural smooth?Are there other tooling marks or decorative areas of weakness, called bedding planes, occur surface patterns? Is any part damaged or missing? where each layer comes into contact with the next. Are there old patches applied to the masonry? Has the entire surface of the facade All brownstone is not created equal, however. Some been patched or refaced some time in the past? Is the is much harder and more durable than others. Stone stone painted? Are past stucco repairs showing signs from the same quarry can have very different of blistering, loosening, or detachment? properties, depending on the specific location where it was quarried. Protection and In the early days, quarries sorted and graded brownstone, saving the good quality, dense material Maintenance Strategies for architectural use. This stone was carved, or dressed, into lintels, doorways, and blocks. Building owners and stewards can avoid many Beautifully preserved brownstone lintels, quoins, problems commonly associated with brownstone and other details can be seen in such grand buildings as St. Paul's Chapel in lower Manhattan. The less through proper maintenance. A regular maintenance desirable brownstone was given over to uses such as program can remedy water infiltration and slow road and rail embankments or other projects where the rate of decay. Deteriorating stone often can be large, rough blocks were needed and the fineness or protected, and repair and replacement costs can thinness of the stone did not matter be reduced. 2 A responsible building owner can carry out most of Causes of the following basic maintenance procedures at a very low cost: Brownstone Deterioration Clearing gutters and leaders of debris at least twice a year allows them Brownstone, like other sandstones, consists essentially of grains of sand that have been consolidated by the to drain properly. pressure of overlying sediments and the presence of a cementing matrix, or binder, between the grains. Repair leaks in the roof and Many of the brownstones used in New York are drainage systems immediately. They can act as a composed mainly of quartz and feldspar, bound by funnel for water, causing severe and costly damage clays and iron oxides. In some cases, silica or calcite to the facade. are also present in the binder. Vegetation, such as ivy, on or Most brownstone deterioration is caused by the immediately adjacent to stone walls traps moisture failure of its cementing matrix. As the mortar joints and prevents the walls from thoroughly drying out. between the stones deteriorate, water finds its way into the interior bedding planes of the stones. Hard Caulking open joints prevents freezes cause expansion of the trapped water within moisture infiltration around windows, doors, and the tiny crevices of the stone, destroying the stone's along horizontal lines in projections, such as window solidity from within. The recrystallization of salts lintels or parapet walls. Use high quality polysulfide, from deicing compounds or mortars also plays a role butyl rubber, or acrylic latex caulk. in deterioration. Metal flashings protect ledges, The most common forms of deterioration are: lintels, ornamentation, and other projections that Separation and failure of stone along its collect and absorb watch Use non-corrosive, non- sedimentary bedding planes. Exfoliation causes the staining sheet metal, such as lead or lead-coated most dramatic failure when a stone unit is "face- copper, to seal the top surfaces and to bridge the bedded," with its bedding planes set parallel to the small, open gaps between the elements. finished face of the stone. "Blind exfoliation" describes bedding layers that have separated but are Crumbling, loose, or still loosely attached, causing the finished surface to missing mortarjoints should be repointed by a sound hollow. Exfoliation is caused by the failure of qualified mason. The repointing mortar must be weakly cemented layers in a stone unit. softer and more porous than the stone. Hard mortar with too high a cement content can accelerate brownstone deterioration. Improper cleaning can cause more damage in minutes than years of weathering. Cleaning is only necessary to protect brownstone ' from pollutants or excess dirt build-up. Use a professional mason to handle the cleaning, and ask 'r to see a sample of their work. A gentle water wash or water and non-ionic detergent wash should be the first cleaning methods attempted. Do not use harsh chemicals or abrasive methods, such as sand-or water-blasting. s Failure of a thin surface layer of the stone parallel to the worked surface of the stone, rather than along its bedding planes. "Crust y formation," "blistering," and "surface induration" are terms used for similar deterioration. Contour scaling occurs when acid-soluble binders dissolve and form a brittle crust at the surface of the stone. This is most likely to occur in areas of frequent — -- — - -- -- - wet-dry cycling, such as windowsills and copings. Loss of cohesion between sand tR~f grains as the binder deteriorates. Disaggregation at _ the surface of a stone can result in slow erosion of the surface and softening of tooling. Areas beneath surface crusts are also often disaggregated. Disaggregation often occurs in sheltered areas where moisture from other sources evaporates, in some cases from salt recrystallization. removal of all deteriorated stone down to solid material. The sound stone is then scarified or Deterioration varies dramatically for the different roughened to provide some mechanical anchorage types of brownstone that were available in the for the composite patch. For large repairs, rods and nineteenth century. The severity of exposure of the wire armatures are sometimes added to provide stone and its orientation in the wall both significantly additional support and to assure that the patch does affect how the brownstone deteriorates. The more not separate from the substrate. The rods can be carving on a facade, the more surface area of the made of fiberglass, nylon, or stainless steel. A stone is exposed to the elements. These factors can durable composite repair must be at least 3/4" thick. create an enduring challenge to the concerned building owner. Due to the difficulty of exact color matching, composites applied to the full face of a deteriorated stone unit are the most successful visually. Usually, it Composite Repairs is preferable to apply composite repairs separately to individual stone units, stopping the edge of the repair at the mortarjoint that separates the unit Composite repair, the application of a tinted mortar- from adjacent stones. like patch to the surface of a deteriorated stone or portion of a stone, is one of the most common Since the 1930s, many brownstone contractors have techniques utilized to repair deteriorated brownstone completely covered the facades of small buildings surfaces. Composite repairs are appropriate where with tinted stuccos. When an entire fagade is heavily small areas of mechanical damage have occurred or deteriorated or when a fagade has been refaced once where the entire face of a unit has exfoliated. before, this approach may be appropriate. Refacing Composite repairs last longer in locations that do not is most successful when they faithfully replicate have heavy exposure to rain. Composites applied to window hoods, door surrounds, and other trim windowsills and wall copings often fail prematurely, elements. Complete refacing should be avoided, due to water infiltration and disaggregation of the however, when significant sections of original stone beneath the repair. In areas where direct wetting brownstone are intact and may be retained. of the patch is not a problem, such as sheltered vertical wall surfaces, composites may be very durable. The proper repair mixture consists of a Satisfactory adhesion of a composite repair requires combination of a binder, aggregate, pigments, 4 f - I admixtures, and water. Most masons have their own Color matching is one of the most preferred composite patching system, and in general, crucial aspects of creating a successful composite it makes sense to use the system with which your patch and should be based on a careful examination mason is most familiar. of the existing stone. The contractor or an architec- tural conservator who specializes in masonry can do The most common repair mixture is a stucco-like the color matching. Manufacturers of proprietary mix consisting of Portland cement and lime binder, mixes can provide a custom color match based on a crushed stone-sand aggregate. and small amounts of sample of the stone being repaired. Samples of pro- dry oxide pigments. The ingredients are combined prietary mixes should be prepared in accordance dry and then mixed with water, often with a small with manufacturer's instructions. amount of acrylic latex admixture. The dry mixture is usually prepared on site. but may also be prepared If the stone is to be cleaned, the repair material must off site in a more controlled setting and brought to match color of the cleaned stone. If the stone's color the site in pails or bags. and dirt or stains give it a varied appearance, select One important point to remember: gray Portland the color that blends best. Repairs in more than one cement should not be used for composite sandstone color may be needed if the color variations are great. patches. It is more difficult to color and work, Often, sandstone buildings are part of a group of shrinks more in curing, and may cause staining. similar fagades, constructed at the same time and of the same sandstone. When repairing entire fafades In In addition to the traditional cement-lime-sand such buildings, it is important to use a color mixture patching mix, many companies market their own compatible with the neighboring buildings. proprietary patching systems. Among the more common proprietary mixes available today are those Even with proper color matching, sold under the Edison and Jahn names. Proprietary a repair will look dead and artificial-like sand mixes have a number of advantages, including sealed up in colored cement -unless the character of uniformity of material, a proven track record, and the surface mineral grains closely resembles that of technical assistance from the manufacturer. Many natural sandstone. Commonly, this is achieved with manufacturers will supply a premixed, color-matched acid-etching or rubbing stones to remove the thin product to which water is added at the site. It is outer film of pigmented cement binder and expose important to ensure that the masons are properly the shape, size, color and distribution of the trained in the use and application of proprietary mixes aggregate grains at the surface of the repair. Patches when using or specifying such mixes. Many proprietary can also be stippled with a sponge or dry-troweled to mixes are not applied in the same manner as create surface effects. Tool marks and patterns can traditional cement-lime-sand mixes, and, like any be matched to those on the original stone. repair, will fail if improperly installed. 5 A successful composite patch, exposed features prone to deterioration, such as whether a small repair or replacement of an entire stoops and stairways, are also often replaced. fafade, should be indistinguishable from the original Damaged elements can be replaced with either natu- stone. Mortar joints in the new repair should ral stone or cast stone. replicate the historic profile. Repairs should not extend continuously between separate blocks of NATURAL STONE For simply tooled units of wall stone, because continuous patches can crack and masonry, natural stone is often the most appropriate fail if the individual stones behind them move. choice. Generally natural stone will be more expensive, but is usually a better match for surrounding masonry. Where possible, photographs and measured drawings Finding a stone that matches the color of the original de sketches should be used to recreate carved stone is extremely important. Salvaged stone, taken uniform development, one can often find surviving decoration. For row houses that are part from buildings that have been demolished, is often sa decoration on adjacent buildings. Decorations found available and the simplest choice for smaller projects. on neighboring buildings may serve as the model for For new brownstone, quarries are currently active in new composite patches or may be used to create Connecticut, Michigan, and Canada's maritime molds for cast stone ornamentation. Historic provinces. For larger projects, imported stone photographs should be consulted to ensure that resembling some brownstone in the Northeast is architectural features that appear on a neighboring available through American suppliers from Germany, building are historically appropriate on the building Scotland, and England. Whenever possible, being restored. brownstone should be laid with its natural bedding planes oriented horizontally ("quarry-bedded"). Alternative Repair Methods CAST STONE Cast stone, which is precast concrete tinted and finished to resemble brownstone, can be a durable and economical material for replacement of In addition to composite repair, there are other stair treads, balustrades, and molded ornamentation. techniques that can be used to repair deteriorated Color and texture are important considerations in brownstone masonry. the use of cast stone. A mixture of cement, sand, and coarse aggregate, most of its color comes from the In some cases, the most durable use of a tinted cementitious matrix. As the matrix and most visually successful "repair" for deteriorated weathers, more of the sand and aggregate are brownstone is replacement. While replacement of exposed. If these are lighter than the matrix, the cast entire brownstone facades is rare, replacement of stone will fade and no longer match the adjacent portions of facades and of individual stone units is stone. The use of crushed brownstone or other quite common. Unit replacement is an appropriate brown aggregates assures a closer and more durable approach with severely deteriorated stone, especially color match. at corners, buttresses, and projecting bays. Heavily After cast stone has been molded, it is common for j the fabricator to lightly sandblast or acid etch the r l9'� tps surface to remove a portion of the cement on the surface and expose the aggregate. Stainless steel reinforcement should be considered for pieces that serve a structural function or that may crack in handling. Keeping the cast stone moist during curing assures proper hydration of the cement in the concrete. Design and fabrication of cast stone is complicated enough that the services of an architect 6 or engineer may be desired, depending on the size Numerous factors must be considered before of the project. consolidation is undertaken, including soundness of substrate, type of consolidant, depth of consolidant A "dutchman" repair may be penetration, methods of and numbers of applications, used with exposed damaged stone where a composite and color change. An architectural conservator repair is infeasible or unlikely to last. A stone should be consulted to guide any proposed dutchman is a piece of stone set into a larger stone consolidation effort. to replace a damaged or missing section. In highly visible locations and in areas subject to frequent wetting, a dutchman will generally be more durable Inappropriate and more successful visually than a composite repair. Re air Methods Although sometimes used for severely damaged p brownstone, dutchmen, adhered with pins and adhesives, are used more frequently with granites and Many historic brownstone buildings in New York marbles. "Full face" dutchman may be used for City have been repaired, restored, or remodeled at brownstone repair when the face of a unit is least once. In some cases, these old rehabilitations deteriorated to a significant depth and the stone have become historic in their own right. Often they surface must be durable. A dutchman might be used, are a testament to the layering of history typical of for instance, where an exposed repair overhangs an old, urban centers. If your brownstone is in an entry or sidewalk, and the failure of a composite historic district, you must check with your local would be hazardous. landmarks board or commission before embarking on a restoration plan. Depending on the age and If the decayed surface of the stone is too quality of the remodeling, it may be seen as shallow for a durable composite repair and the depth significant feature. of deterioration does not warrant unit replacement or a dutchman, retooling may be considered. Reworking Many brownstone owners today need to address the the decayed surface of an individual stone and failures of old repairs. Old patches often fade over retooling the stone is most successful where the time, resulting in a patchwork appearance to the original surface of the stone is roughly tooled and building. Old stucco or cement may start to come loose, and some areas may blister and detach from the plane of the fagade is not extremely important. the substrate. Sometimes, these failures occur as a Smooth honed and finely tooled surfaces, as well as result of natural aging, but sometimes they are rock facing, are more difficult to retool successfully. caused by inappropriate repair methods or installation. Retooling that does not match the original tooling of the stone is not advisable. Repointing with a mortar that is too hard or impermeable will damage In recent years a number of brownstone. Impermeable mortars force water, products have been developed to "consolidate" which enters the masonry through joints and cracks, or strengthen deteriorated stone. These liquid to collect in, and evaporate through, the stone itself preservatives can play a limited role in some rather than through the mortar joints. Moisture brownstone restoration projects. trapped in the masonry often damages the stone through salt crystallization or frost damage. In Consolidants may be appropriate where a extreme cases, the masonry will spall completely, stone surface is slowly eroding or where original leaving protruding mortar. Similarly, composite tooling or carving is still present, but threatened. patches that are too vapor impermeable will result in deterioration of the natural stone. Pointing mortars Consolidants cannot re-adhere separated should be sacrificial to the surrounding stone or surface layers or repair severe damage. brick, and owners should expect to repoint their building from time to time. 7 Tinted cementitious coatings Repainting of sound stone that has already been are available under a variety of trade names and are painted is an option if paint removal is likely to one of the most common repair methods to avoid. cause damage or if it would expose old. non-matching Unlike composite repairs, which are generally repairs. If painting is appropriate, use oil-based paint applied only to deteriorated stone, brush-on cementi- over previously painted stone and latex paint on ious coatings are often indiscriminately applied to exposed stone. entire facades of sound and deteriorated stone. These coatings tend to hinder vapor transmission through Waterproofing and water repellent he stone surface and hold water inside the stone, coatings tend to trap moisture and migrating soluble eventually causing it to disaggregate. In areas of salts. This may cause loss of stone surface through severe water infiltration, near roofs or parapets, freezing or salt recrystallization. These coatings may coatings such as these may lead to frost damage. also alter the color and reflective qualities of the While they may match stone coloration when they stone. They also require regular and frequent are initially applied, cementitious coatings tend to reapplication, making this an expensive option for fade and may be highly disfiguring. They are also homeowners. difficult to remove without damaging the surface of the stone. Sandblasting, high-pressure water blasting, and other abrasive cleaning or paint Painting brownstone is generally not removal techniques damage stone and should never recommended. Even paints that are vapor permeable be used. may retard the passage of moisture and cause the underlying stone to deteriorate. This is especially true where cracks or open joints allow water to enter The Future of the masonry. A thick paint buildup may lead to future damage by trapping moisture in the stone Brownstone Preservation behind it. Painting will not preserve decayed stone, since paint will adhere omy to sound material. A rich heritage of architectural brownstone has survived to the present day in the neighborhoods of New York City. These buildings and homes have endured despite adverse structural, mineralogical, ,a. and environmental conditions. 77 Sjr...P Restoration of brownstone fagades has grown into an industry. Natural stone supplies are more easily available today than in years past, and repair methods are advancing rapidly. A trip to many brownstone blocks in warn weather will show one or more houses in the process of being repaired. �+ Brownstone restoration can be a complex process for ., building owners, but if they are prepared with a i practical understanding of sandstone and its problems, they can continue to preserve this legacy for future generations. 8 Further Reading Conservancy Publications The following is a selective list of books and articles of use to the homeowner. Emphasis has been placed In addition to the on general works and information particularly helpful Conservancy offers other helpful publications to the novice, as well as more recent articles not to the public: cited elsewhere. covers inspection, maintenance, and repair of historic facades made of brownstone, limestone, brick, Carosino, Catherine, et al, editors. terra cotta, cast iron, and wood. $29.95 Washington, D.C.: Preservation is a Assistance Division, National Park Service, complete guide to window deterioration, United States Department of the Interior. 1993. maintenance, replacement, and repair for homeowners and professionals. S24.95 Fisher, Charles E. and Hugh C. Miller, editors. . New York: Henry N. Abrams, Inc. 1998. is a step-by-step guidebook that explains the basics of project Foulks, William G., editor. planning, management, and supervision to laypeople and clergy. $20.000 New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 1997. is a practical guide for building Friedman, Donald. caretakers and professionals with chapters on the building envelope (roofs. walls, and New York: W. W Norton & Company, Inc. 2000. drainage systems), structural systems, mechanical systems, energy cost-saving measures, and McKee, Harley. cyclical maintenance. SI5.00 Washington, D. C.: National Trust for Historic For more information or a publications order Preservation. 1973. form, call 212-995.5260 or visit www.nylandmarks.org Weaver. Martin with Frank G. Matero. New York:John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 1993. The National Park Service has published over 40 Preservation Briefs on a range of subjects related to the repair and maintenance of historic buildings. Many of these briefs are now online at http://www2.cr.nps.gov/tps/briefs/presbhom.htm. �h t•r�Pt't't*ttt�Q 1�Itew York The New York landmarks Conservancy is proud to theaters, cultural institutions, and community announce that 2003 marks our 30th anniversary. centers. In turn, we help revitalize neighborhoods Since 1973, the Conservancy has advocated for and shape the future of our great City. preservation of New York's unique architectural heritage in Washington, Albany, and at City Hall. The Conservancy's Technical Services Center is In addition, it is the only preservation organization nationally recognized for its expertise in addressing in New York City- and one of the few in the building problems. Its staff answer questions from country-with the financial and technical resources hundreds of owners each year and help them find to back up advocacy with assistance. and manage qualified architects, craftspeople, con- tractors, and other consultants. The Center's In thirty years, we have awarded nearly S22 million in publications offer detailed, practical guidance on loans and grants, accompanied by countless hours of the preservation of specific building types, materials, pro-bono technical advice, to owners of historic and features. For answers and referrals, call the homes, businesses, schools, houses of worship, Preservation Hotline at 212-995-5260. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Non-Profit Orq, EF' " 141 Fifth Avenue U.S.Postage New York,NY 10010 P A t D New York,NY Permit No.BO58 Patricia Kelleher From: Dan Ricciarelli <dricciarelli@segerarchitects.com> Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2017 9:08 AM To: Patricia Kelleher Cc: dricciarelli@segerarchitects.com Subject: SHC meeting Attachments: A-2.pdf Categories: HDC Patti, Can you put us on the next meeting agenda for the Lutt's deck(24 Winter Street). We moved the deck into behind the main gable roof(se attached). Let me know how many sets you will require. Thanks, Dan Daniel Ricciarelli, R.A. Seger Architects, Inc. r•: 978.744 0208 f. 978.744 0145 e. dricciarelli(a)seoerarchitectscom 1 XIST. SLOPED SLATE ROOF v ¢ E Z EXIST. SLOPED EPDM MEMBRANE ROOF y r N Y U Q. 14' a XISTING BRICK CHIMNEY RAISED PEDESTAL SYSTEM WITH IPE EXIST. SLOPED SKYLGHT WOOD 2' X 2' DECKING O BE RAISED IF REQUIRED 77= 0 c i 1 < � V r y Cr f _ G j N 8' + OR - t Proposed ROOF Deck Platt FULL HEIGHT DOOR ELEVATED N SCALE 1/4• - r-o' OFF FLOOR Q ZBA SUBMISSION 1/24/2014 Patricia Kelleher From: Dan Ricciarelli <dricciarelli@segerarchitects.com> Sent: Thursday,January 19, 2017 9:41 AM To: Patricia Kelleher Cc: dricciarelli@segerarchitects.com Subject: 24 Winter Street Patti, I spoke with the Applicant, Peter Lutts for the roof deck at 24 Winter Street.We are submitting for Zoning Board Approval on the proposed deck this month.We would like to withdraw our Historic Commission application without prejudice and re-file when we have secured our approval to construct the deck. Thank you, Dan Daniel Ricciarelli, R.A. Seger Architects, Inc. p: 978.744.0208 f: 978.744.0145 e: dnwiarelliOsecerarchRects.COM 1 f. II ~/ 2 0 • • • 1 9 a pl 44 � _ l f r �,: ! Y > =fit .. A4 G� •�_ - \ � \ ,� 'Ya.I nT t J t F(J I • • MATTim am 1=0 • • • U r w � v � .. o w o � a 0 Proposed View from Winter Street Federal Style Iron Railing 0 SCALE. N/A scnLE: N/A 4"x4" WOOD Y SUPPORT POSTS Q = E AT 8'-0"❑.C. ATWP o -- , 44" HIGH b 3/4" IR❑N RAILING AT 4" 0. ' ff ❑,C, BETWEEN Tk �� WOOD SUPPORT N POSTS r \ STRUCTURED WOOD FINISH DECK ! u EXIST SLOPED ROOF ao ,z Proposed View from Oliver Street Iron Railing Detail scaiE: NIA SCALE ,/r - r—T Q HISTORICAL COMMISSION SUBMISSION 12/08/2016 z s C °+t � o pi• .0 m r Proposed View from Winter Street Federal Style Iron Railing o SCALE N/A SCALE. N/A 4'x4' WOOD v - SUPP❑RT POSTS A v -- -- AT 8'-0'❑,C, AT ? 44' HIGH `� a i 3/4" IR❑N r RAILING AT 4' j r... ❑,C, BETWEEN g WOOD SUPPORT POSTS f STRUCTURED +lll��j "; II! 1'ij��l II' Iil WOOD FINISH DECK EXIST SL❑PED ROOF - Proposed View from Oliver Street Iron Railing Detail SCALE. N/A SCALES 1/z•- 1•-(f HISTORICAL COMMISSION SUBMISSION 12/08/2016 T° I fff ,� � ��- - - amu;,, • v7 KIM r • ,� CITY OF SALEM MASSACHUSETTS a DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT KIMBERLEY DRISCOLL MAYOR 120 WASHINGTON STREET ♦ SALEM,MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELE:978-619-5685 ♦ FAx:978-740-0404 Tom DANIEL,AICP DIRECTOR STAFF MEMO TO: Salem Historical Commission FROM: Patti Kelleher,DPCD DATE: January 4,2017 RE: 24 Winter Street—Certificate of Appropriateness Historic Name: Captain John Bertram House Construction Date. 1842-43 Architectural Style: Federal/Greek Revival 16 17 t6 2 X 21 / I 18 9e 1 / 18 S n 9 6 B f v a11R +� Y by o f!P' L+♦ fi 26 qF' fi 32 1°! !p 50 O 1 2 � Proposal.• Construct roof deck on rear ell.Deck railings to have 4"x4"wood support posts and 3/4"iron railings placed 4"on center. Staff Comments: The proposed deck railing on the rear ell will be visible from Winter Street as show in the above photograph.It appears that the deck floor will be raised approximately 11/2 feet above the existing roof but it is unclear how the exposed edge will be finished and whether the roof deck will be set back from the wall plane of the ell. For the deck railing,the architect is proposing a combination wood and iron railing design similar to the design of the property's granite and iron picket fence along Winter Street(see image on page 2). The deck railing wood posts are shown as stained while the pickets are black. StaffMemo IHistoricalCommissionI 11 ' Square Page 2 •wwnnnnn�A Proposed Vlow from WInter Stmet Federal Style Iron Railing SUPPORT P13STS AT W-WOZ AT 44' HIGH 3/4' IRON RAILING AT 4' EXIST SLOPED VOOF Or- XTWEEN WOOD SUPPORT POSTS STRUCTURED �, � I IIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIII rni innnnennnnnni i�� Y 1 I ,,.r:7��'I 111 Illlilllllllll�Illllllllll Ile '.i r V r I Date Stamp " • ec-�� Rvd,\ Salem Historical Commission 1.'L0'NASMN';-0%S-REST.S4LEA1.M.ASBACHUSETTS 1 For Office Use Only X978.ri14.tiSHS r-AX 19"8. .74n.p:p� APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Pursuant to the Historic District's Act (M.G.L. Chapter 40C) and the Salem Historical Commission Ordinance, application is hereby made for issuance of a Certificate of Appropriateness for: ✓❑ New Construction ❑ Moving ❑ Reconstruction ❑✓ Alteration ❑ Demolition ❑ Painting ❑ Sign ❑ Other District: []Derby Street 1—h afayette Street [:]vlcIntire ✓❑Washington Square Address of Property: 24 Winter Street,Salem MA 01970 Name of Record Owner(s): Peter N. Lutts Owner Mailing Address: 24 Winter Street,Salem MA 01970 Description of Work Proposed Please type or print clearly.Attach ad& oral sheets, as necessary. The scope of work on the project shall include the following: Preparation of existing membrane roof to receive proposed Roof Deck Structure with 3/4" Iron Bar and 4"x4" Wood Post Railing at a height of approximately 4'-8" above existing finished roof elevation.The proposed structure will be predominately viewed from the rear of the structure on the West elevation facing Oliver Street, with minor elements being seen from the side on the East elevation facing Winter Street. Minor alterations to the South and West Facades will occur where the proposed new deck ties structurally into the existing facade of the building. Name of Applie D Ricci ❑Owner❑Contractor enant ✓❑Other:Architect Signature: Date: /% Tel. 9: 978-7440208 E-mail Address: dricciarclli@segeraZbitects.com Certificate will be mailed to the owner unless otherwise indicated hem: Certificate should be mailed to: Name Peter Lutts Mailing address:24 Winter Street City:Salem State:MA Zip: 01970 ATTACHED DOCUMENTATION An application will not be considered complete unless all work items are thoroughly described and the application includes all information needed for the Commission to make a determination. Failure to submit a complete application may result in a continuation to a future meetinn Recommended information includes: Photos of existing conditions, taken from all public ways Site plan showing location of improvements Elevation drawings of the existing conditions and proposed improvements Drawings of details and other special conditions, including profiles Description,photographs, and/or catalog cuts of proposed materials (please bring to the meeting product samples,if appropriate) Dimensions(i.e.height of fence, size of pickets and posts, etc.) Paint color samples, if applicable(no less than 2.,x2.,) Location and size of all mechanical equipment, such as transformers,HVAC equipment, electrical service and meters, and proposed screening RECEIVED PROCEDURES FOR FILING APPLICATIONS DEC 16 2016 A. Be prepared to apply for approvals well in advance of commencing any exterior work. Before making any changes to the exterior of a party inan historic district.die owner should call orvisit the Commission representative atthe Department ofPlarmin1alifh6C tif discuss proposed alterations mid to determine the category of the application(Appropriateness,Non-App11 O1rr r, frhS )LO B. The Commission normally meets on the first and third Wednesdays of each month and notices are posted at City Hall. The meetings are held at 120 Washington Street,3rd floor.and begin at 7:00 p.m. All meetings are open to the public and any person is entitled to appear and be head on any matter before the Commission before it reaches a decision. C. An application for a Certificate of Appropriateness or Hardship must be received by 3:00 p.m.on the Monday 16 days before the meeting in order to make the agenda. An application for a Certificate of Non-Applicability may normally be added to the agenda up to the day of the meeting. In some cases,a Certificate of Non-Applicability may be issued by die Clerk,without review by the full Commission,after notifying Commission members and allowing 24 hours for any objection. There is no fee for any applications. D. All applications for Certificates of Appropriateness or Hardship require a public hearing. Notice of the hearing must be posted with the City Clerk 14 days before the hearing and abutters must be notified in writing. Commission staff will handle these procedures. A public hearing is not required for n Certificate of Non-Applicability. E. Applications must be submitted by the owner of die property. A contractor for the owner,at the owners request,may submit an application on the owner's behalf. In case of a tenant,a waiver of the owner's appearance maybe granted at the discretion of the Commission if it is requested by the owner. F. All applications must include photos of existing conditions,taken from all public ways. No certificates can be issued until receipt of photos. G. An application will not be considered complete unless1�1 work items are thoroughly described on scaled drawings and include specifications regarding dimensions, materials, and any other information needed for the Commission to visualize the changes in order to make a determination. Applications for paint colors should include a paint chip or chart. The following items should be included in your drawings as applicable(exhibits should be 8'/.x I I or be able to be folded to 8'/,x I I): 1. Site plan showing location of improvements; 2. Elevation drawings of the specific improvements: 3. Details/profiles(i.e.moldings,fence caps,cornices,vents,etc.); 4. Materials(i.e.wood,brick,etc.); 5. Dimensions(i.e.size of trim);and 6. Transformers,heat pump and condenser locations,electrical entries and meters,lanmp posts,stove pipes. H. At the hearing,the Commission will discuss the application with the applicant or his representative,hear the abutters and take a vote. Owners having professional consultants such as architects or contractors are urged to have them be present at the hearing. Ifthe application is approved, a Certificate will be mailed to the mailing address provided on the application and copies will be sent to the City Clerk and Building Inspector. Please note that the application can be continued until the next meeting if the Commission deems necessary(Le.for reasons of incomplete drawings,to perform a site visit,etc.). In any case,the Commission must make a determination within 60 days from the date the application is received,unless the applicant waives that requirement in writing. 1. A property owner or a contractor cannot receive a building permit unless a Certificate has been issued. Please be sure to obtain appropriate permits from the Inspector of Buildings(or other necessary permits and approvals)prior to commencing work. J. The homeowner may opt not to commence the work approved(unless it relates to resolving an outstanding violation). Work commenced must be completed within one veer from the Certificate date unless otherwise indicated. K. The City of Salem reserves the right to inspect the project to determine compliance with the conditions set forth in the Certificate issued. Violations A person commencing or completing work to the exterior of a building in an historic district without the necessary approval of the Commission is subject to fines of up to$500 per dayfrom the date of violation. The Commission is not responsible form owner's neglect to inquire about necessary City permits and approvals. All records are public and we will confidentially assist you if you are concerned that someone in your neighborhood is in violation. Assistance The Commission's guidelines are available for viewing at the City of Salem Department of Planning&Community Development(DPCD),at the Salem Public Library oron4ineatlittp://wwwsalemconm/Pages/SalcmMA Historic/index. The guidelines provide examples of what ishistorically appropriate (or inappropriate) for Salem's neighborhoods including trim, siding, barrier frec access, doors, fences, gutters/downspouts, masonry, mechanical equipment,paint colors,parking solutions,porches/steps,roofing,satellite dishes&solar energy systems,secondary egress,skylights,utilities,windows, etc. These guidelines help you understand what changes are likely or unlikely to be approved. The Commission supports your efforts to improve your property and can guide you on historical appropriateness. Further information,including City-wide architectural inventories,is available. For more information,contact the Clerk of the Commission at the DPCD, 120 Washington Street,Salem,MA 01970,978 619-5985. Fcv.10/12 CONDIT yvg -A. �a 3 Salem Historical Commission 120 WASHINGTON STREET, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 (978)619-5685 FAX(978)740-0404 NOTICE OF HEARING The Salem Historical Commission will give a public hearing to all persons interested in the application of: Peter N. Lutts on the property at: 24 Winter Street concerning: Installation of roof deck Date of Hearing: January 4, 2017 Time of Hearing: 7:00 p.m. Location of Hearing: 120 Washington Street, 3id Floor Conference Room By Order of the Salem Historical Commission Patti Kelleher Community Development Planner To view the entire meeting agenda which is posted 5-7 days before the meeting, please visit http://www.salem.com/Pages/SalemMA HistoricalAaendas/ Persons with special needs should contact the Clerk of the Commission at 978-619-5685 to arrange for reasonable accommodation. Please allow ample time.for us to arrange for your request. yr i �sI jr c� Salem Historical Commission 120 WASHINGTON STREET, SALEM,MASSACHUSETTS 01970 (978)619-5685 FAX(978) 740-0404 CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS It is hereby certified that the Salem Historical Commission has determined that the proposed: ❑ Construction ❑ Moving ❑ Reconstruction Alteration ❑ Demolition ❑ Painting ❑ Signage ❑ Other work as described below will be appropriate to the preservation of said Historic District, as per the requirements set forth in the Historic District's Act (M.G.L. Ch. 40C) and the Salem Historic Districts Ordinance. District: Washington Square Address of Property 74 Wirllei Street(carriage Nonce) Name of Record Owner: Jeffrey & Ann Laaff Description of Work Proposed: Installation of custom wood overhead carriage house door painted to match existing trim color. Size is l0'("x TO". Paint wood clapboard siding at exterior wall infill to match, 5/4 wood painted door casings to match. Dated: July 19, 2012 SALEM TORICAL C��N By: The homeowner has the option not to commence the work (unless it elates to resolving an outstandi violation). All work commenced must be completed within one year from this date unless otherwise indicated. THIS IS NOT A BUILDING PERMIT. Please be sure to obtain the appropriate permits from the Inspector of Buildings (or any other necessary permits or approvals) prior to commencing work. RECEIVE JUL 0 2 7012 DEFE OF PLANNING(k Salem Historical Commission 13 k4WLMTYOEVEL()PMENt J0 45u�s M WASHINGTON STREET.SALEM,MA 01970 .� (9781745-9595 EXT.311 FAX(978)740-0404 APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Pursuant to the Historic District's Act (M.G.L. Chapter 40C) and the Salem Historical Commission Ordinance,application is hereby made for issuance of a Certificate of Appropriateness for: Construction Moving Reconstruction Alteration Demolition Painting Other aq as described below. 1,4seV District &P&-L Original Building Construction Date, if known: l8 r 1�� Address of Property: Z¢ lA)/",IS-/ r G �iO�cSe�/'drL�,S Gl�l Name of Record Owner(s): Description of Work Proposed (Please include required scale drmvings,paint chips, catalog cuts and/or samples of material proposed where applicable.) IVe uJ Gds fTJ/k aJ o�� U t/ e✓-jt ecz � " �/y i`rc�C� /v 6 4,s e c,4061- 11 C is Ll ��£ �D /rL a tcl.-�.1( !`S ('kj P moi` �a Z O r' See 42�f/mc/(P� P Y 0 eeez e(- J S;z e /d 16 rte, 7 ,e) ., A/at� Gt)Ca eS� /P a 7`d dt�1�CG1. diide three to • • • • • 7 Ze 74S-C, Boy 14 Signature of O Tel. #: p 7661 - 7< S _ __CC2 svv � Mailing addr : /t 2✓— S City: S� ed2L- Staod-Zi0(/�0 EXISTING LOFT DOOR TO REMAIN. i EXISTING STANDING AND RUNNING WOOD TRIM TO BE RESTORED AND PAINTED,MATCHING EXISTING. NEW COLONIAL LANTERN WALL MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURES(2). REFER TO ATTACHED PRODUCT LITERATURE. NEW CUSTOM WOOD OVERHEAD "CARRIAGE HOUSE DOOR', PAINTED TO MATCH EXISTING TRIM COLOR. REFER TO ATTACHED PRODUCT LITERATURE. SIZE: 10'-6"X T-0". NEW PAINTED WOOD CLAPBOARD SIDING AT EXTERIOR WALL INFILL CONSTRUCTION MATCHING EXISTING. NEW 514"PAINTED WOOD DOOR CASINGS MATCHING EXISTING. OLIVER STREET (WEST) ELEVATION m:. 1June 2012 11 316'=VT 1102 CARRIAGE HOUSE RESTORATION & REPAIRS PROPOSED 1 ' LAAFFRES(DENCE 24WinlerSbeet Saem.Manachusells - OLIVER STREET ELEVATION A-3 PIERCEARC[i1TECTS 22 Andre,9mm Salem.Mmsxhuscns n1910a Tel:971 ii31310 E mil:psca=hilemsi§vtt ml r I lob r I�1 Ua - '- - ;1 L, — _ loll 1-0 •r Y'. —y J II I J II Q I IRI I _ E 'CARRIAGE CUSTOM HOUSE', EARN DOOR',,PAINTED. REFER TO ATTACHED EXTERIOR ELEVATION AND PRODUCT LITERATURE I F o EXISTING CARRIAGE HOUSE I II I� I I J' ar rni n cx.. 1 Jere 2012 1102 n,x....... / N ate. CARRIAGE HOUSE RESTORATION & REPAIRS PROPOSED A- 1 LAAFFRESIDENCE 2awinlerStmol Salem.Messacnesees — GROUND FLOOR PLAN PIERCE ARCHITECTS 22 Am n.Seatl 019913-0 hl 979.853.3310 Email:piercnm0ile.uC venwnmt x! CONTRACT DOCUMENTS si The Laaff Residence 1 May 2012 wa Ri all A >� f t .k a � I i 4 'E*:CEI\S TJ 151 and 21011001 w-ndowS 3t SE coTer 04 A 94 94 A a ASONRY RESTORATION. REPOINTING & REPAIRS Pierce Architects Pace Overhead Door Quality Features Match any architectural style with a range of beautiful, naturally rot-resistant lumber choices: ■ Mahogany, ■ Spanish Cedar, ■ Clear or Rustic Cypress • Other Species Upon Request 2-3/4" Door Thickness ensures maximum strength and thermal efficiency Cypress internal core framework with oversized stiles and rails creates a strong foundation for exterior face lumber attachment •A Core is water-sealed with '/4" Loan plywood laminated to both sides so no water penetrates and weep holes are not needed Exterior stiles and rail lumber: • 1 '/4"thick, creating real shadow lines • Fully laminated to core with Type I waterproof adhesive ■ Horizontal planes sloped to shed water • Over 200 screws attach face lumber to core for extreme durability and tightness • Screws are Counter-bored and wood plugged ❖ Biscuit joinery wherever horizontal and vertical stiles and rails meet provides a tight Joint that won't open up with expansion and contraction ❖ Deep V-groove in center creates the illusion of a pair of doors 3/4"thick field area material fits between stile and rails preventing water infiltration. True divided windows for authentic old-world construction and beauty. Polystyrene insulation between panels for an R Value of 6 ❖ A lifetime warranty with our exclusive UV and weather-protection basecoat applied on all six sides of every component—only from Hahn's! HAHN''S" WOODWORKING COMPANY, INC. 181 Meister Ave. Branchburg.NJ 08876 Ph:908-722-2742 Fx:908-722-2736 Small:sales(a?hahnswuodwurkine com Web:�N�vw.hahnswoodworkinexom NeWto jX.Q�rtlop 26 3/4'High Outdoor Wall Light I LampsPlus.com 6/4/12 5:55 PM Sign In or Create an/ iiAMM Keyword or item# On Sale Open Box/Clearance Shop by Room Stores Catalogs Ordi America's Largest Specialty Lighting Retailer 120%Guarantee and l,4ore Call Center Hours yarn - LAMPS PLUS I Carriage I Outdoor Lighting I Newton Collection 26 3/4"High Outdoor Wall Light Newton Collection 26 Light Style # 66497 Write a Review Hand forged iron and seeded glas carriage house look. $500.91 + FREE SHIPPING- Compare x:754.99 QTY: i Save Energy! Purchase with a dim I }, In Stock -.Ships in 3 to 5 Days I r' Need Heil-r Live Chat I Persona „y. EF This handsome outdoor lightinc house detailing and style accen hand forged iron with an old br add to the visual appeal. Wall r • Old bronze finish. • Takes three 60 watt candel t. (not included). • 26 3/4" high. Ll • 11" wide. • Extends 9 3/4" from the wi Zoom Full Screen Email Print Like 1 Share Related Items select all I none add selected to Cart I to Wish List . . �. �xb�:,.::a sem?„�,�� '.a~ �u. .' �,. � f `. ..d� - -.F t' .' . ,� i t . . wr 4k% n fit �: vb,��ONUrr Q feC INK Salem Historical Commission 120 WASHINGTON STREET,SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 (978)619-5685 FAX(978)740-0404 CERTIFICATE OF NON-APPLICABILITY It is hereby certified that the Salem Historical Commission has determined that the proposed: ❑ Construction ❑ Moving Reconstruction ❑ Alteration ❑ Demolition ❑ Painting ❑ Signage ❑ Other Work as described below does not involve an exterior architectural feature or involves a feature covered by the exemptions or limitations set forth in the Historic District's Act(M.G.L. Ch. 40C) and the Salem Historic Districts Ordinance. District Washington Square Address of Property: 24 Winter Street Name of Record Owner: Jeffrey and Ann Laaff Description of Work Proposed: Remove, reset and repoint brick on South and East main facades. Rebuild chimneys to replicating existing, repointing as needed and including new copper flashing. Mortar to match existing in color, thickness and texture. Re-slate South.facing roof above flat roof to replicate existing. Replacement of flat roof and gutter/downspouts to replicate existing. No changes in color, material, design, location or outward appearance. Non-applicable clue to heing in kiln! maintenance/replacement. Dated: May 4, 2012 SALEM HISTO L ISSION By: The homeowner has the option not to commence the work (unless it relates to resolving an Outstanding violation). All work commenced must be completed within one year from this date unless otherwise indicated. THIS IS NOT A BUILDING PERMIT. Please be sure to obtain the appropriate permits From the Inspector of Buildings (or any other necessary permits or approvals) prior to commencing work. Salem Historical Commission 120 WASHINGTON STREET,SALEM,MA 01970 (978)745-9595 EXT.311 FAX(978)740-0404 APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF NON-APPLICABILITY Pursuant to the Historic District's Act (M.G.L. Chapter 40C) and the Salem Historical Commission Ordinance, application is hereby made for issuance of a Certificate of Non-Applicability for: Construction Moving Reconstruction Alteration Demolition Painting Signer as described below. District: S;(&« C-,V/4% '&aD/-. Original Building Construction -Date, ifknown: l8 Address of Property: 2 1 (1 z i z 1� S�n✓ee ( )- f�� l9 70 Name of Record Owner(s): J �� /� nG2 I-AAFF .lob J)or-t32-1611 Description of Work Proposed: RP p r-C)x , I m O "I f—�sref�u ,1✓�_ w� 4__ -7i�_ex4-u✓e �P� ro� c ; fC, /z'H, c vk �i �Ccz^ /Ci1P// L/t i�vi dq c2 5 r� � ��v-� r.�2_ S o U �Li -mac i,tom( ,5 i cP� GD c> �o„JU ✓� �� -too-,c � �C_ /Ler/ca F e-�� F v-e� IG -- ��: R )> Gam. 6 .e k i S, /-I 'A.1 10 4- �o )� � LA-)/ 1�6Q Ie , to w e ✓' �G�f-,/yc�� tee /tec� o ✓� �� /l�cevr�c -�— Signature of Owner: Tel. #: �'_ 7�^ 7q S - Oe o 9 ik�s sage Mailing address:12 � S City:Sd �e"'L State:_Zip:o l� d � l CA � m a sX 11,0 0 b mM � A � N c b w _ rn - ^ 0 r N y, rl !l� N \ co M m N 00 2D � vJ o r h L o � N � �l CONTRACT DOCUMENTS 1 May 2012 i The Laaff Residence 14 I; Photo 13: View of intersection at upper flat ftar and gravel)roofslate roof, and lower flat roof Cut horizontal masonry joint one course above the existing counter flashings at lower flat roof to create regle[ al for installation of new copper counter flashings by roofing contractor Cut masonry joints above slate roofing to create reglets for installation of new stepped capper counter flashings by g — - roofing contractor G Photo 14: Close up of Photo 13 showing the intersection of slate JI roof and lower flat roof at exterior brick wall. t 1 r _ r mar Photo 15: View of gutter return at upper flat roof and brick war below. A MASONRY RESTORATION, REPOINTING & REPAIRS Pierce Architects i Page 18 v�XV T Salem Historical Commission ONE SALEM GREEN,SALEM,MASSACHUSETTS 01970 CERTIFICATE OF3PPRORMH%SS It is hereby certified that the Salem Historical Commission has determined that the proposed: ❑ Construction ❑ Moving ❑ Reconstruction ❑ Alteration ❑ Demolition ❑ Painting ❑ Signage Y Other work as described below will be appropriate to the preservation of said Historic District, as per the requirements set forth in the Historic District's Act(M.G.L. Ch. 40C) and the Salem Historic Districts Ordinance. District: McIntire Address of Property: 24 Winter Street Name of Record Owner: Jeffrey &Ann Laaff Description of Work Proposed: Installation of black louvered panel to cover furnace pipes as per drawing submitted. One pipe to project 1" beyond, to be painted black Dated: June 8, 2000 SALEM HISTORICAL COMMISSION By: The homeowner has the option not to commence the work(unless it relates to resolving an outstanding violation). All work commenced must be completed within one year from this date unless otherwise indicated. THIS IS NOT A BUILDING PERMIT. Please be sure to obtain the appropriate permits from the Inspector of Buildings (or any other necessary permits or approvals)prior to commencing work. 4 ' 4 r� _ Q7 7 t i olayd �nop aup suaa i a�f' N!al ZL1�L Jeffrey Laaff 24 Winter Street Salem, MA 01970 Memo Ta Salem Historic Commission Dennis Ross, Plumbing Inspector From: Jeffrey Laaff Dat.: 05/03/00 Re: Furnace Ventilation Proposal We propose to install a black lowered panel as per following details and drawing to improve the exterior appearance of our home at 24 Winter Street. Salem, MA. We would like to go before the Salem Historic Commission two weeks hence, May 17, 2000. Please let us know if this is acceptable. Details Remove existing 3" 900 tum-down pipe from 3" intake pipe. Have pipe project one inch horizontally through existing wall termination kit. Cut back 2" diameter vent pipe so as to have pipe project 1" beyond the exterior wall and foundation of house. Visible pipe to be painted black. Insulate this pipe with minimum 1/2" arma-flex insulation. Use muriatic acid solution to remove grey portland cement from exposed brick and granite where visible from street. Install 2 x 6 pressure treated jambs into opening. Install 26 59' x 14 W louvered pine panel flush with outside brick surface. Install replacement tumpieces at each side to secure panel and to facilitate inspection. Remove excess bark mulch to a distance of 12'from termination going in either direction to provide a minimum 12"grade clearance to bottom elevation of 3"intake pipe. Top 2 louvers will allow more return air through panel than is required by the 3"intake pipe. w w a� r4 Ca CD a �+ a z3 � O l . I i ! I I I I iil /I I n V 2 1 � I '-ate ttt . k� _ real•_ IC }} 1 Li `7, 7 Saiem 71s orled7l' Commission ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM. MASSACHUSETTS 01970 1508) 745-9595 EXT, 211 FAX (508) 7400404 CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS It is hereby certified that the Salem Historical Commission has determined that the proposed: ❑ Construction ❑ Moving X, Reconstruction ❑ Alteration ❑ Demolition ❑ Painting ❑ Signage ❑ Other work as described below will be appropriate to the preservation of said Historic District, as per the requirements set forth in the Historic District's Act (M.G.L. Ch. 40C) and the Salem Historic Districts Ordinance. District: Washington Square Address of Property: 24 Winter Street Name of Record Owner: —d ffrey & Ann Laaff Description of Work Proposed: Restate rear ell addition on two sides as noted on application. "A"side to be 12"wide slate, "B"side to be 10"or 12"wide slate. Slate to be similar in color to main portion of hove. Dated: .tune 5. 1997 SALEM HISTORICAL COMMISSION t By: !X (N i l The homeowner has the option not to commence the work (unless it relates to resolving an outstanding violation). All work commenced must be completed within one year from this date unless otherwise indicated. THIS IS NOT A BUILDING PERMIT. Please be sure to obtain the appropriate permits from the Inspector of Buildings (or any other necessary permits or approvals)prior to commencing work. T,:. , ' .• w J 4� .. =f11 . �'y/tier��°��,�� 0521!1997 12:31 PANAFAX OF-600 ** 13712123 P.01 / 1 •+4i M1p .�dle4tn : istoriCal Commission ONE SALEM GREG."; SALCM. KIASSACHUSFT-g 01970 (508)'45.9683 ExT. 311 FAX (508) 74-.•0406 APPLICATION FORA CERTIFICATE OF APEROP r T N ¢e Pursuant to the Historic District's Act (M.G.L. Chapter 40C) and the Salem Historical Commission Ordinance, application is hereby made for issuance of a Ceitificato of Appropriateness for - 13 Construction 0 Moving Q Reconstruction E'� Alteration ❑ Demolition O Painting 0 Sign 0 Other as described below. District: " ` ' "' �`� Building Construction Date, if known: Address of Property: Name of Record Owner: J��i- e PIC- Descriptionof Work Proposed: (Please attach required scale draivings, paint chips and/or samples of work and material prpposed, where :+pplicable.) (,4_1/ Z X [t3 C ek-"c p,J�o�- CL s r-L . G[,4- s-✓ �- s��.fP 3 c> , � alum CINUUMUM"UnTr"MrM09MIJAM ) 6/ 7 8 `t'� - Ei3l> O :gttature of Owner: Tel. Ni 5'07f-�— U C> `V ;ailing address: City: Sa�`"~ State-P Zip: �2O ¢ Lvr NGS S TOTAL P.01 ;..; '.t ✓�7`r�r ��/�'y� V�� t Salem Historical Commission A CITY HALL. SALEM, MASS. 01970 4 4 CERTIFICATE OF NON-APPLICABILITY It is hereby certified that the Salem Historical Commission has determined that the proposed construction [ ] ; reconstruction [x]; demolition [ ] ; moving [ ]; alteration , [ ] • painting [ ]; sign or other appurtenant fixture [ ] work as described below in the . . . Washington Square Historic District. (NAME OF HISTORIC DISTRICT) Address of Property: 24 Winter Street Name of Record Owner: Jeffrey Laaff DESCRIPTION OF WORK PROPOSED: Repair exterior trim, shutters and mouldings as existing. Repainting house in existing colors. No changes in color, material, design or outward appearance. Non-applicable due to being in-kind maintenance. does not involve an exterior architectural feature or involves a feature covered by the exemptions or limitations set forth in the Historic District's Act (MA- Gen. Law, Ch. 40C) and the Salem Historical Commission. Please be sure to obtain the appropriate permits from the Inspector of Buildings prior to commencing. Dated: 10/13/93 SALEM HHIIISTORICAL COMMI ION By 14 Chairman