61 WARD STREET - WDDO (2) (Dt ��� d �� - WDDa 2m�
tl
1
Salem Historical Commission
120 WASHINGTON STREET, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970
(978) 745-9595 EXT.311 FAX (978) 740-0404
WAIVER OF THE DEMOLITION DELAY ORDINANCE
It is hereby certified that the Salem Historical Commission has waived the Demolition Delay Ordinance for the
proposed demolition as described below, as per the requirements set forth in the Historic District's Act (M.G.L.
Ch. 40C) and the Salem Historic Districts Ordinance.
Address of Property: 61 Ward Street
Name of Record Owner: City of Salem
Description of Demolition Work Proposed:
Demolition gl'entire huilding.
The Commission recommends that the buildini, h e,fnst me vured.fc r.Jile documentation-
Dated: 2/1/07 SALEM HISTORICAL COMMISSION
By: / n . _
Gc � ? I
7 Y
THIS IS NOT A DEMOLITION PERMIT. Please be sure to obtain the appropriate permits from the Inspector
of Buildings (or any other necessary permits or approvals) prior to commencing work.
• RECEIVED
DEC 1 9 2001
COmmule�EVNNING 6
Salem Historical CommissiaW41NT
120 WASHINGTON STREET,SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970
(978)745-9598 EXT 311 FAX(978)740-0404
APPLICATION FOR WAIVER OF THE DEMOLITION DELAY ORDINANCE
Pursuant to the Historic District's Act(M.G.L.Chapter 40C)and Salem Code 2-1572,application is hereby
made for issuance of a Waiver of the Demolition Delay Ordinance for demolition as described below.
Address of Property: 6[ �J 1j S�
Name of Record Owner(s): CI 'U �� Sa le-W) 1 MaS5
Original Building Construction Date, if known— X 1920
Is the property listed on the National Register of Historic Places or contributing to a NR District?
Description of Demolition Work Proposed:
Please attach any historical data and photographs, buddingplans, structural reports, or other pertinent information and
submit at least a week before the scheduled meeting. Applicants who omit this information or submit their application less than
a week before the meeting date should expect to attend additional meeting(s). A site visit of the property may be requested.
Briefly describe the extent of the demolition: prolpojej d erw b&A-1 e�- d ujcmm yid st
one, 3ibry k,/a"/si,uo ya,/�� Ct�..,� y� s�><,o,,� 4� 6/ wekid Sf-.
Briefly describe the reason/justicationfordemolition: %ZG (XS � 61 Wmid Jled-
: �✓d17 -4
6&s Seem abando7a, cwd urvxd oy decade3
4 hds he4a a 117ak-t eAc,1 oh V-t t/4-^7J 7ly j> /wlfd/iK >`�c
hctJl�lwbr,d ud 74, d-kh , V447e4-4-. /
Briefly describe any proposalforfutureconstruction/development: T(e, 6/ 441d-
S/
41dSt�ecj c'� A /tend 4 d ✓.may 476hc 'Vold W7 litk-tse-CtlI-t CAM �r �
Co,9Yws; 4/md slrrefs). Cl� Pla,ru 111% �Jk4 j I41n rte
feu s h ?k. roadKrd7
Signature ofoq�TTel. #: `j- bt'y- 5W
WaSkb�t4 S'{ t� 6/
Mailing address: �� f He/l/low) City: Safe" State:MhZip: DIYFO
PROCEDURES FOR FILING APPLICATIONS
A. Be prepared to apply for approvals well in advance of commencing any exterior work. Before making goy changes to the exterior of a property
in an historic district,the owner should call or visit the Commission representative at the Department of Planning&Community Development to
discuss proposed alterations and to determine the category of the application(Appropriateness,Non-Applicability or Hardship).
B. The Commission normally meets on the first and third Wednesdays of each month and notices are posted at City Hall. The meetings are held rt
120 Washington Street,3rd floor,and begin at 7:30 p.m. All meetings arc open to the pubic and any person is entitled to appear and be heard
on any matter before the Commission before it reaches a decision.
C. An application for a Certificate of Appropriateness or Hardship must be received by 3:00 p.m on the Monday 16 days before the meeting i_1
order to make the agenda An application for a Certificate of Non-Applicability may normally be added to the agenda up to the day of the
meeting. In some cases,a Certificate ofNon-Applicability may be issued by the Clerk,without review by the full Commission,after notifyin g
Commission members and allowing 24 hours for any objection. There is no foe for any applications
D. All applications for Certificates of Appropriateness or Hardship require a public hearing. Notice of the hearing must be posted with the City
Clerk 14 days before the hearing and abutters must be notified in writing, Commission staff will handle these procedures A public hearing is
not required for a Certificate of Non-Applicability.
E. Applications must be submitted by the owner of the property. A contractor for the owner,at the owner's request,may submit an application on
the owner's behalf. In case of a tenant,a waiver of the owners appearance may be granted at the discretion of the Commission if it is requested
by the owner.
F. All applications must include three to four 35mm photographs of existing conditions No certificates can be issued prior to receipt of
photographs
G. An application will not be considered complete unless g)Lwork items arc thoroughly described on scaled drawings and include specifications
regarding dimensions, materials, and any other information needed for the Commission to visualize the changes in order to make a
determination. Applications for paint colors should include a paint chip or chart The following items should be included in your drawings as
applicable:
1. Site plan showing location of improvements;
2. Elevation drawings of the specific improvements;
3. Dela Wprofiles(i.e.moldings,fence caps,cornices,vents,etc.);
4. Materials(i.e.wood,brick etc.);
5. Dimensions(i.e.size of trim);and
6. Transformers,heat pump and condenser locations,electrical entries and meters,lamp posts, stove pipes.
H. At the hearing,the Commission will discuss the application with the applicant or his representative,hear the abutters and take a vote. Owners
having professional consultants such as architects or contractors are urged to have them be present at the hearing. If the application is approved,
a Certificate will be mailed to the mailing address provided or.the application and copies will be sent to the City Clerk and Building Inspector.
Please note that the application can be continued until the next meeting if the Commission deems necessary(i.e. for reasons of incomplete
drawings,to perform a site visit,etc.). In any case,the Commission must make a determination within 60 days from the date the application .s
received,unless the applicant waives that requirement in writing,
1. A property owner or a contractor cannot receive a building permit unless a Certificate has been issued. Please be sure to obtain appropriate
permits from the Inspector of Buildings(or other necessary permits and approvals)prior to commencing work.
J. The homeowner may opt not to commence the work approved(unless it relates to resolving an outsanding violation). Work commenced must
be completed within one year from the Certificate date unless otherwise indicated.
K. The City of Salem reserves the right to inspect the project to determine compliance with the conditions set forth in the Certificate issued.
Violations
A person commencing or completing work to the exterior of a building in an historic district without the necessary approval of the Commission is subject
to fines of up to$500 per day from the date of violation. The Commission is not responsible for an owners neglect to inquire about necessary City permits
and approvals. All records are public and we will confidentially assist you if you are concemed that someone in your neighborhood is in violation.
Aec;cranr�
The Commission's guidelines are available for viewing at the Salm Planning Department and the Salem Public Library. The guidelines provide examples
of what is historically appropriate(or inappropriate)for Salm's neighborhoods including trim, siding,doors, fences,gutters, masonry, paint colors,
parking solutions,porches,roofing,satellite dishes, secondary egress, skylights,utilities,windows,etc. nese guidelines help you understand what
changes are likely or unlikely to be approved. The Commission supports your efforts to imprcve your property and can guide you on historical
appropriateness. Further information,in the forth of books,articles and pamphlets,City-wide architectural inventories,and photographs,are available at
the Historical Commission's office at 120 Washington Street For more information, contact the Clerk of the Commission, lane Guy, at the Salem
Planning Department, 120 Washington Street,Salem,MA 01970,978 745-9595,Ext.311. Rev.I M4
Front fagade of building, looking from
Peabody Street
r' -
rw
1!77-
1'
.•1
is
Rear fagade of building, looking from rt!ki�J!
Peabody Street
:a
61 Ward Street
Site Photos
TTIF
� � IIIIIIIIl3
1:11 . `_�•..r
i
+�►� „ b
— Front fagade of building, looking from
Ward Street
f�
r
i
INSPECTION REPORT FOR
Asbestos-Containing Building Materials, Lead-Based Paint,
Polychlorinated Biphenyls and Mercury Components
Vacant Building
61 Ward Street
Salem, MA
Prepared for:
Mr. Michael Geisser
Alliance Environmental Group, Inc.
100 Jefferson Boulevard, Suite 220
G Warwick, RI 02888
■
Prepared by:
Smith & Wessel Associates, Inc.
8 Church Street
Merrimac, MA 01860
Project 05124
April 30, 2005
CONTENTS
Section
Page
INTRODUCTION.........................................................................................................................................1
EXCLUSIONS........................................................ ............................................................................................'7
1.0 ASBESTOS-CONTAINING BUILDING MATERIALS.............................................................3
1.1 SCOPE OF WORK........................................................................................ .......................................3
1.3 REGULATORY GUIDANCE................................ ..................................................................................3
1.3 FINDINGS......................................................... ..................................................................................4
Table 1 •List of Materials Testing Positive for or Assumed to Contain Asbestos..........................a
Table 2•List of Materials Testing Negative forAsbestos..................................................................5
1.4 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS...........................................................................................5
1.5 COST ESTIMATES................................................................................................................................6
Table 3•Abatement Cost Estimates......... ...........................................................................................6
2.0 LEAD-BASED PAINTS.................................................................................................................
2.1 SCOPE OF WORK.................................... ...........................................................................................i
2.2 REGULATORY GUIDANCE....................... ...........................................................................................1
2.3 FINDINGS................................................ ...........................................................................................5
Table 4 • Summary of Surfaces Coated With LEP..............................................................................5
2.4 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS.................................................... ....................................10
3.0 POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS(PCBS)..........................................................................11
3.1 SCOPE OF WORK.............................................. ...............................................................................I 1
3.2 FINDINGS..........................................................................................................................................II
3.3 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS.........................................................................................11
4.0 MERCURY IN LIGHT BULBS...................................................................................................12
4.1 SCOPE OF WORK..............................................................................................................................12
4.3 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS.........................................................................................12
4.4 COST ESTIMATES..................................... ........................................................................................12
APPENDIX A
Certificates of Asbestos Bulk Sample Analysis(PLM)
Smith 8 Wessel Associates, Inc. SWA 05124
4/30/05
Introduction
+� Alliance Environmental Group retained Smith & Wessel Associates, Inc. (SWA), to
conduct an inspection for asbestos-containing building materials (ACBM), lead-based
paints (LBP), polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in fluorescent light ballast, and mercury
containing components at 61 Ward Street in Salem, Massachusetts.
The building consists of approximately 400 square feet and consists of two small rooms,
a bathroom, and a side storage room. The fagade is made of relatively new imitation
brick.
A Massachusetts certified asbestos inspector and accredited lead inspector representing
SWA conducted the inspection on April 26, 2005.
Asbestos
The purpose of the inspection was to evaluate the types, locations, and extent of suspect
ACBM and to provide appropriate recommendations for its abatement prior to demolition
of the building. S WA's inspection addressed both friable materials (materials that can be
� easily crumbled, crushed, or pulverized by hand pressure) and nonfriable suspect
R7 materials. Limited destructive testing was performed to access behind fixed walls and
ceilings. However, extensive destructive testing was not performed. Hence, there may be
some suspect ACBM present that was not identified. If any suspect ACBM is identified
during demolition work, it must be assumed to be ACBM unless appropriate sampling
G and analysis demonstrate otherwise.
■ SWA identified both nonfriable ACBM in the form of mopped-on roof tar flashing
Lead Based Paint(LBP)
The purpose of the inspection was to evaluate the types, locations, and extent of suspect
LBP at the building, to evaluate potential hazards associated with LBP, and to provide
appropriate recommendations for its handling associated with demolition work.
The United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) has
established a standard for lead-based paint, as tested using an X-Ray Fluorescence
Analyzer(XRFA) of 1.0 milligrams per centimeter squared (mg/cm). Although this
standard applies only to housing funded by the federal government, it is a useful reference
concentration for assessing hazards associated with lead in paint in other settings. Thus,
when paint contains greater than 1.0 mg/cm2, special care should be taken when
conducting activities that impact these paints.
The lead content of paints surveyed at this site was less than 1.0 mg/cm2 as measured
with an XRFA. However, if surfaces coated with even small amounts of lead are
impacted by the renovation in a manner that may generate dust or fume, compliance with
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)regulations regarding worker
Smith 8 Wessel Associates, Inc. SWA 05124
Page 1 4/30/05
w
exposure to lead may be necessary. Additionally, Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) regulations relative to waste disposal may apply.
PCBs and Mercury
An inspection of selected fluorescent light fixtures was conducted to determine if their
ballast contained PCBs, to extrapolate this sample across the building to determine the
total quantity of ballast containing PCBs, and to make recommendations for their proper
handling and disposal.
Concurrently, fluorescent bulbs and thermostats were counted to determine the extent of
mercury containing components within the structure and to make recommendations for
4� their proper handling and disposal.
Exclusions
While Smith & Wessel endeavored to conduct a thorough, comprehensive inspection,
some exclusions are warranted. Our inspection included building areas only; no
assessment of soil, debris, subterranean areas, inaccessible crawl spaces, or inaccessible
tunnels or trenches was attempted. We attempted to inspect accessible building areas and
enclosed locations, where practical, using hand tools only. Areas that typically can only
be assessed with machinery include but we not limited to foundation walls, spaces behind
brick fagades, inside equipment, sub floors, and the like.
While Smith & Wessel followed industry standards during the inspection, we do not
I'+ warrant that all suspect hazardous building materials were identified in or on the building.
■ This is due in part to inherent problems with every building inspection, such as, but not
limited to the following variables:
• Seemingly homogeneous materials that are not in fact homogeneous,
• Seemingly representative locations that are not in fact representative,
• Layered materials that are not uniformly present or are isolated,
• Materials that are present in an isolated and limited quantity
• Materials that are present in locations that are unsafe or otherwise difficult to
access.
During the course of demolition work, it is possible that additional hazardous materials or
materials suspected of being hazardous will be identified. Such materials should be
assumed to be hazardous unless appropriate evaluation or sampling and analysis
demonstrate otherwise.
Smith 6 Wessel Associates, Inc. SWA 05124
t Page 2 4/30/05
1 .0 ASBESTOS-CONTAINING BUILDING MATERIALS
1.1 Scope of Work
Smith & Wessel's Massachusetts certified asbestos inspector Ted Sherry (cert. # Al
32572) performed the asbestos inspection of readily accessible and observable areas of
the building. Limited destructive testing was employed in order to access behind fixed
walls, ceilings, and facades. SWA inspected for the following types of suspect ACBM:
• Thermal system insulation, such as insulation on pipes, boilers and related equipment;
Surfacing material, such as fireproofing applied to structural components, acoustical
I'A and decorative plasters, and other sprayed or troweled applications; and
• Miscellaneous materials, such as ceiling tiles, floor tiles, mastics, roofing materials,
and wallboard.
�j To determine the asbestos content of suspect ACBM, representative bulk samples were
Al collected by extracting a small portion of suspect material from the substrate. The
samples, typically measuring one cubic centimeter, were collected using a variety of
methods. The extracted samples were placed into individual, sealed plastic bags for
transport to the laboratory.
Bulk samples were analyzed by AmeriSci Boston of Weymouth, Massachusetts, a fully
accredited asbestos analytical laboratory. The laboratory analyzed the samples using
Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM), in accordance with the requirements of 40 CFR Part
763, Subpart F, Appendix A.
Because PLM is not consistently reliable in detecting asbestos in floor coverings and
similar nonfriable organically bound materials, when a negative result is obtained by
PLM (less than one percent asbestos), Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) is
recommended to confirm the result.
For each homogeneous sampling group, the laboratory analyzed samples until a positive
result was obtained (i.e. greater than one percent asbestos). If one sample indicates an
asbestos content greater than one percent, the entire homogenous area must be considered
to be an ACBM even if one or more samples in the group indicates an asbestos content of
less than one percent.
1.3 Regulatory Guidance
The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Occupational Health &
Safety Administration (OSHA), MA Division of Occupational Safety (DOS), and MA
Department of Environmental Protection(DEP) are responsible for regulating the release
of asbestos into the environment and protecting workers from exposure to airborne
asbestos fibers. OSHA and MA DOS are responsible for the health and safety of workers
Smith ,& Wessel Associates, Inc. SWA 05124
y� Page 3 4/30/05
who may be exposed in connection with theirjobs including asbestcs abatement. The
EPA and MA DEP are responsible for developing and enforcing regulations necessary to
protect the general public from airborne contaminants that are known to be hazardous to
human health.
The EPA and MA DEP regulate ACBM associated with renovation, demolition, and
asbestos abatement projects via the National Emissions Standard for Hazardous Air
Pollutants (NESHAP)regulation and MA DEP asbestos regulation (3 10 CMR 7.00, 7.09
and 7.15). These regulations require that buildings be inspected for ACBM prior to
renovation and/or demolition projects. In addition, the regulations stipulate that all
friable ACBM as well as nonfriable ACBM teat are in poor condition, or that will be
made friable by renovation activity, be removed or otherwise appropriately abated before
they are disturbed.
1.3 Findings
SWA identified the following friable and nonfriable suspect ACBM:
• White joint compound associated with gypsum board
• Gypsum board
• Roofing felt (top layer)
• Roofing felt(bottom layer)
• Black mopped-on tar flashing
A total of 10 representative bulk samples of the above materials were collected of which
9 were analyzed using PLM (see Appendix A). One of the samples did not require
analysis because the first sample in the homogeneous group tested positive for asbestos.
In Table I SWA has listed material testing positive for asbestos, along with the locations,
quantity, and sample number.
Table 1 • List of Materials Testing Positive for or Assumed to Contain Asbestos
Material Location uant ty Sam les'
Black mopped-on tar flashing Throughout perimeter of upper and 115 If 05A
lower roof sections
Smith 6 Wessel Associates, Inc. SWA 05124
Page 4 4/30/05
In Table 2, all materials that tested negative for asbestos using PLM analytical methods
are listed, including the locations where these materials were observed and the
corresponding bulk sample reference number(s).
;77 Table 2 • List of Materials Testing Negative for Asbestos
'I9
t✓j
Type of material Location Sam pie#s
ttt Joint compound associated with Throughout the two rooms, bathroom and side 01A, B
gypsum wall board storage
Gypsum wall board "Throughout the two rooms,bathroom and side 02A, B
storage
Black roofing felt(top layer) Throughout perimeter of upper and lower roof 03A, B
sections
Black roofing felt(bottom layer) Throughout perimeter of upper and lower roof 04A,B
sections
1.4 Conclusions and Recommendations
On the basis of our findings, we offer the following conclusions and recommendations:
Y
i64
I. Nonfriable ACBM are present on the roof. Because the building is scheduled for
demolition, removal of impacted ACBM will be necessary before they are disturbed
I by renovation work. A general contractor or roofing professional may remove and
dispose of asbestos containing roofing materials consistent with the regulation
summarized below.
2. Asbestos containing asphalt roof materials may be removed by a qualified roof
contractor provided the materials are removed intact and not sawed, sanded, ground,
cut or drilled during the demolition process. If qualified roofing contractors remove
asphalt based roof materials, a minor cost savings may be achieved. The roofing
materials must not be compacted or incinerated. In addition, all provisions of DEP
Policy Statement Concerning Non-Friable Asbestos Containing Materials (Policy #
B WP-96-012) must be followed.
3. Because SWA's inspection did not include extensive destructive or intrusive
inspection techniques, it is possible that some suspect ACBM are present that was not
identified. If any suspect ACBM is identified at a later date and not addressed in this
report, they should be assumed to be ACBM until appropriate sampling and analysis
demonstrate otherwise.
4. S WA observed paint cans and other chemical containers in the side storage room.
These items will need to be disposed of in accordance with state and federal
regulations prior to demolition.
Smith 8 Wessel Associates, Inc. SWA 05124
Page S 4/30/05
s
i
1.5 Cost Estimates
We have identified asbestos roofing material at the site. The following cost estimates are
based on current industry standards that may fluctuate rapidly based on a variety of
factors such as, but not limited to, the prevailing economic climate, seasonal differences,
union labor considerations, scale of the abatement, and occupancy of the building. It is
recommended that qualified abatement contractors be solicited to determine actual
pricing involved. All cost estimates assume asbestos abatement contractor will conduct
the abatement work. In addition to pricing for abatement, anticipated industrial hygiene
costs associated with abatement have been included.
Table 3•Abatement Cost Estimates
Type of Material Quantity/unit cost Total Estimated Cost S
Black mopped-on tar flashing material 115 sf A 15/sf 1,725.
Industrial Hygiene Estimate 425.
Total Abatement Estimate 2,150.
Note: The industrial hygiene cost is inclusive ofambient air monitoring during removal and a post
abatement final visual inspection. Although it is -not required to perform ax sampling for roofmg materials,
it may be prudent to monitor the abatement due tithe high visibility location of the building.
Smith 8 Wessel Associates, Inc. SWA 05124
Page 6 4/30/05
5
2.0 LEAD-BASED PAINTS
2.1 Scope of Work
SWA's accredited lead paint inspector tested representative painted surfaces throughout
FA the building. We analyzed paints for lead content using the NITON XL-309, X-ray
fluorescence analyzer(XRFA) following the manufacturer's instructions for initial
y calibration and operation. The XRFA uses a radioactive source to excite the electrons of
J lead atoms (if present) in paint. As the lead atom electrons return to their normal state,
they emit x-rays that are measured by the XRFA, then processed and the results converted
iPq to milligrams of lead per square centimeter of sampled surface area. On most substrates,
the XRFA is precise to +0.1 mg/cm2.
Surfaces tested included, but were not limited to, walls, windows, doors, casings/jambs,
trim and other miscellaneous surfaces on a variety of substrates including wood, cinder
block, and gypsum board.
nn
2.2 Regulatory Guidance
In all areas where LBP is disturbed by renovation or demolition work and where
components covered by LBP are disposed of, applicable OSHA and EPA regulations
apply.
.W OSHA
Renovation or demolition activities that disturb surfaces that contain lead must be
conducted in accordance with the OSHA regulation 29 CFR 1926.62 "Lead Exposure in
Construction: Interim Final Rule." This regulation requires that a site-specific health and
safety plan be prepared before conducting activities that create airborne lead emissions.
Such a plan should include the identification of lead components, an exposure
assessment, and, if applicable, the required work procedures and personnel protection to
be used.
An exposure assessment in the form of personal air monitoring must be performed if
there is the potential for employees to be exposed to lead due to the renovation or
demolition activity. If demolition is being conducted that will disturb lead-based paints,
the employer must assume that employee exposure is in excess of the Permissible
Exposure Limit (PEL) of 50 micrograms per cubic meter of air(µg/m), until the
N exposure assessment is completed. If the PEL is exceeded, employees are required to use
half-face mask respirators with HEPA filter cartridges. Furthermore, a written respirator
program is required per 29 CFR 1910.134. The lead standard also requires the following
protective measures be taken until the exposure assessment is completed:
• Isolation of the work area;
• appropriate personal protective clothing and equipment;
Smith 8 Wessel Associates, Inc. SWA 05124
Page 7 4/30/05
• change areas and hand washing facilities;
• biological monitoring; and
• training
The results of the initial exposure assessment will determine the protective measures that
must be followed for the remainder of the project. OSHA may allow air-monitoring data
from previous projects conducted under conditions closely resembling the present project
to be used for the exposure assessment. If the exposure assessment indicates that
exposure levels are below the Action Level of 30 p/m3, there are no additional
requirements under the standard if the ccnditions remain the same.
EPA
In addition to the worker protection requirements stipulated by OSHA, MA DEP and the
EPA regulate the disposal of wastes that are potentially hazardous. Such wastes may
include paint chips and residue generated during abatement or repainting work, or whole
' components, such as wood windows, doors, and trim that are coated with LBP and that
are disposed of as the result of renovation or demolition work. Metal components are not
regulated if they will be recycled and not disposed of in a landfill.
To determine the required method for disposing of permeable items coated with LBP, the
DEP and the EPA require representative sampling of the debris to determine the quantity
of lead that would be expected to leach into the environment if the debris were disposed
of in a landfill. The representative sample(s) must be analyzed by the Toxicity
Characteristic Leaching Process (TCLP). If&e result of this procedure indicates that the
sample leaches a lead concentration below five parts per million(ppm), the debris is not
regulated and can be disposed of in a traditional construction landfill. However, the
debris must be disposed of as hazardous waste if the TCLP result exceeds 5 ppm. To
minimize the total volume of hazardous waste, segregating hazardous from nonhazardous
waste is advisable.
HUD
The United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) has
established a standard for lead-based paint, as tested using an XRF analyzer, of 1.0
mg/cmi. Although this standard only applies to housing funded by the federal
government, it is a useful reference concentration for assessing hazards associated with
lead in paint in other settings. Thus, whe:i paint contains greater than 1.0 mg/CM2, special
care should be taken when conducting activities that impact these paints. When
conducting abrasive blasting, torch burning, or similar activities that generate significant
dust or fume, hazards can be caused even at concentrations below the HUD standard.
Smith 8 Wessel Associates, Inc. SWA 05124
a Page 8 4/30/05
2.3 Findings
m Analysis of painted surfaces throughout the building indicates that lead levels range from
<0.1 mg/cm2 to 0.3 mg/cmz. A summary of paints are listed in Table 4. No elevated
_ concentrations of lead (greater than 1.0 mg/cm2) were present at the site.
Table 4 • Summary of Surfaces Coated With LBP
Location Substrate Color Component Quantity
Main Areas
Gypsum board White Wall <0.1
Wood White Doors <0.1
Wood White Door frames <0.1
Wood White Window frames <0.1
,r
Wood White Baseboards 0.2
Cinder block Green Wall(original) 0.3
Storage Gypsum board White Wall <0.1
T Exterior Wood Red Window/door panels <0.1
Wood White Door frame <0.1
■
^a
71
1
a
.a
v
Smith 8 Wessel Associates, Inc. SWA 05124
Page 9 4/30/05
Z4 Conclusions and Recommendations
Based on our findings, we offer the following conclusions and recommendations:
1. Elevated concentrations of LBP were not found on representative components
throughout the building. However, the disruption of materials ttat are covered by
small amounts of LBP may require compliance with the OSHA lead standard. To
minimize exposure to airborne dust or fume, torch burning, cutting, grinding, or
similar high impact work on components covered by LBP should be avoided. Such
work would need to be conducted by properly trained workers using appropriate
1 worker protection and engineering controls.
2. For work activities that may generate airborne lead, the contractor(s)should perform
an initial exposure assessment in the form of personal air monitoring for each
individual task (e.g. demolition, abrasive blasting, and painting) that has the potential
for causing worker exposure to be at or above the OSHA Action Level. In lieu of
monitoring, historical data from similar operations may be used to comply with
OSHA requirements.
■
Smith 8 Wessel Associates, Inc. SWA 05124
Page 10 4/30/05
3.0 POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS (PCBs)
!=i 3.1 Scope of Work
SWA's observed light fixture ballast in the building suspected of containing PCBs.
Typically, the words "No PCBs" are imprinted on the label of the ballast if it does not
contain PCBs. To determine if light ballast contained PCBs, SWA inspected ballast
associated with each type of fluorescent light fixture in the building.
3.2 Findings
SWA inspected the ballast in the rear section of the main area and the side storage room.
All of these ballast contained the "No PCBs" label. Therefore, we assumed that all of the
ballast at the site do not contain PCBs.
3.3 Conclusions and Recommendations
SWA concludes that the ballast do not contain PCBs and may be recycled as normal
construction waste.
■
k
Smith 6 Wessel Associates, Inc. SWA 05124
Page 11 4/30/05
4.0 MERCURY IN LIGHT BULBS
4.1 Scope of Work
Typically, when fluorescent light fixtures, thermostats, or switches will be removed and
disposed of, SWA makes conservative assumptions that they contain mercury and should
1 be handled as regulated waste in accordance with the universal waste regulations. SWA
observed only two fluorescent light bulbs in the side storage room that are assumed to
contain mercury. No thermostats were observed in the building.
4.3 Conclusions and Recommendations
tBased on our findings, SWA makes the following conclusions and recommendations:
1. Mercury containing fluorescent light bulbs will need to be collected and properly
' packaged for transport to a recycling facility prior to being disturbed by
demolition activities.
4.4 Cost Estimates
Because of the small quantity of mercury containing fluorescent light bulbs observed at
the site, it is estimated that the cost to collect, package, and recycle the bulbs will be
approximately $50.
Smith 8 Wessel Associates, Inc. SWA 05124
Page 12 4/30/05
APPENDIX A
v4
�9 Certificates of Asbestos Bulk Sample Analysis (PLM)
t
Iz'
t�
1.1
,4
a
A
i
3
i
Smith & Wessel Associates, Inc. SWA 05124
A-1 4/30/05
uu•OJr cUUJ 11:U. JIOJ4o ILOJ DMI I 1 Rr11' Wt�btL rH�G U:!nJ.
ten* AmeriSci Boston
AMERI SCI WEYMOUTH, MACHOOLi02 B
TEL: (7y11 337-8334 •FAX (73".) 337-'642
April 27, 2005
I
Smith &Wessel Associates. no,
Atin Bill Wessel
8 Church Street
Merrimac. MA 01880
RE: Smith&Wessel Associates, Inc.
Job Number 5D5041404
P.O. 0 05124
06124; 81 Ward St.: Seem, MA
Dear Bill Wessel:
Enclosed are the results for PLM asbestos analysis of the following Smith&Wessel Associates. Inc. samples received at
AmeriSci on Tuesday,April 28,2005,for a 3 day tunaround:
01A 018,CZA, 028, 03A,038,04A,048.05A,W8
The ID samples contained in plastic sample bags were shipped to Ameri8d via Hand Delivered. These samples were
plepa-ed and analyzed according to the EPA Interim Method ;EPA EOO/M4-82-020 per 40 CFR 793, sltipt F. App.A). The
requirad analytical information,analysis results. analyst signature and laboratory identification is =ontaired in the Analyst's
Report.
This report relates ONLY to the sample analysis expressed as percent asbestos. AmeriSci assumes no responslbility for
customer supplied data such as"sample type", "location".or'area sampled'. This report must not be used to claim orodud
endorsement by Amansic, NVLAP er any agency of the U. S. Government. The National institute of Standard&and
'ethnology Accreditation requirements, mandates that this report must not be reproduced,except in full without the written
approval of the laboratory. This report may contain specific data not covered by NVLAP or ELAP acereditaWns respectively, if
so identified in relevant footnotes.
AmeriScl appreciates this opportunRy to serve your organ"tion. Please contact us for any fuller assistance or with any
questions.
1 Sirxa
� 'I
�ohn A. Bums
t PL.M/PCM Supervisor
Boston •Lot MANN•NM Vork•RIyhrr rnd
lT
AmeriSci Boston
8 SCHOOL STREET
AMERI SCl WEYMOUTH, MA 02169
A: TEL. (781) 3379334•FAX: ('81)337-7642
ar;ry
i
PLM Bulk Asbestos Report
r-
- Smith & Wesse' Associates, Inc. Date Received 04/26/05 AmeriSci Job No,505041404
Attn: Bill Wessel Date Examined 04/27/05 P.O. M 05124
8 Church Street Page 1 of 3
Merrimac, MA C1860 RE 05124; 61 Ward St.; Salem, MA
Client No. / HGA Lab No. Asbestos Present Total % Asbestos
01A 505041404-01 No NAD
1 Location: 1st Floor Front Film.
( ! Description: Off-White, Homogeneous, Non-Fibrous, Joint Compound (White)
I` Asbestos Types:
Other Material: Non-fibrous 100. %
r'
0113 505041404-02 No NAD
1 Location: 1 si Floor Bathroom
Description: Off-White, Homogeneous,Non-Fibrous, .Joint Compound (White)
Asbestos Types:
Other Material: Non-fibrous 100. %
02A 505041404-03 No NAD
2 Location: 1 st Floor Front
Description: BrowniOff-White, Homogeneous, Fibrous, Gypsum Board(White)
Asbestos Types; —
Other Material: Cel uloso 12. %, Fibrous glass 3. %, Non-fibrous 85. %
026 505041404-04 No NAD
2 Location: 1 st Floor Rear
Description: Brown%Off-Wiits, Homogeneous, Fibrous, Gypsum Board(Wh,te)
Asbestos Types:
Other Material: Cel ulcse 12 %, 71brous glass 3. %, Non-fibrous 85. %
03A 505041404-05 No NAD
Location: West
J
Description: Black, Homogeneous, Fib,eus, Top Laver Roofing Felt(Black)
Asbestos Types:
Other Material: Fibrous glass 15. %, Non-f brous 85. %
"I.'u�. .UUJ ♦i. U� Ji OJYC ILJO bMI Irl AND k9tbbLL r'Hbt U�/✓J,_ .
Ameri5ci Boston
8 SCHOOL STREET
AMERI SCI WEYMOUTH,MA 021 EB
TEL: (781)337-8334•FAX:(781) 337.7642
"'mac
PLM Bulk Asbestos Report
Smith & Wessel Associates, Inc. Data Received 04/26/05 ArneriSci Job No.505C41404
Attn Bill Wessel Date Examined 04/27/05 P.O. # 05124
8 Church Street Page 2 of 3
Merrimac, MA 01860 RE 05124; 61 Ward St.; Salem, MA
ta�
Client No. / HGA Lab No. Asbestos Present Total % Asbestos
038 505041404-06 No NAD
3 Location: East
Description: Black, Homogeneous, Fibrous,Top Layer Roofing Felt(Black)
Asbestos Types:
Other Material- Fibrous glass 15. %, Non-fib cus 65. %
04A 505041404-07 No NAD
4 Location: West
Description: Black, Homogeneous, Fibrous, Bottom Lyr Roofing Felt (Blk)
Asbestos Types:
Other Material: Cellulose 80. %, Non-f brous 40. %
04B 505041404-08 No NAD
4 Location: East
Description: Black, Homogeneous, Fib'ous, Eottom Lyr Roofing Felt (Blk)
Asbestos Types:
Other Materiel: Cellulose 60. %, Non-fibrous 40.%
05A 505041404-09 yes 15 `.%
5 Location: North (Pe,imeter)
Description: Black, Homogeneous, Fibrous, Tar Flashing (Black)
Asbestos Types: Chrysotile 15. %
Other Material: Non-fibrous 35. %
05B 505041404-10 NAPS
5 Location: West(Perimeter)
Description: Tar Flashing (Black)
Asbestos Types:
Other Material:
i --
i
UtiJ N7+lUtJ7 ll:b4 tl/tld4b1''267 bM11H ANL WLbbLL r'AbL ub/h7
AmeriSci Boston
AMERI SCI WEYMOU HO MA 02189
TEL, (781)337-9334•FAX*(781 i 337-7642
PLM Bulk Asbestos Report
Smith & Wessel Associates, Inc. Date Received 04/26/05 AmeriSci Joh 1n.5C5041404
AEn: Bill Wessel Date Examined 04/27/05 P.O. 0 05124
8 Church Street Page 3 of 3
Merrimac, MA 01860 RE 05124; 61 Ward St.; Salem, MA
Reporting Notes: !! r
Analyzed by:Steven P.Onse J0 Date Analyzed:
'NADMSD=no asbestos de[ d; NVA=no viable asbestos; NA=not anayzed; NAPS=not analyzed/
positiva stop; PLM Bulk Asbestos Analysis by EPA SOOIFM-62.020 per 40 CFF 703(NVLAP Lab 0102079.0;:
(� Note:PLM Is not consistently ratable In detecting asbestos In Moor coverings and similar non•fnab!e organically
■7 bound materials. TEM Is currently the only method that can be used to determine it this material can be
considered or treated as non-esbestoa-oontalning In New York State (also see EPA Advisory for floor tile, FR 59•
148,38370.811/94). National Institute of Standards and Technology Accreditation requirements mandate trial this
report must not b r ced except in fill without the approval of the laboratory. This PLM report relates ONLY
to the hems test
�
Rsv!e.vsd
i1
r
h..
�a
r�
A
SIGN SUMMARY:
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER R1 -1 R3-1 R4-7 R5-1 R7-1 L R7-1 R D3-1 D3-2
SIZE OF SIGN WIDTH 30 24 24 30 12 12 24 24 MEET EXISTING
(INCHES) HEIGHT 30 24 30 30 18 18 8 8 `�
TEXT STOP ® ' PA& r7 wino sf�r l
cog m,o
= �
CONNECT PROP. MH TO EXIST. DRAIN iLIMIT OF COLDPLANE
NUMBER OF SIGNS REQUIRED 4 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 AND ERLAY PROP. WCR #®
PROP. 8" CONC. PIPE ;
AREA IN SQUARE FEET 1 6.25 4 15 6.25 1 .5 1 .5 1 .33 1 .33 l
PROP. CB
r
- ,.. PROP. WCR
_
_ p
:
.. � .- ,. .... ,_.- , , .. •• t 14 a'.. 1. /,
ADJUST EXIST. CB PROP. CONC. SW ,
T
1 zv
Y f J1ly ��'\ i. �•a
PROP. S
ADJUST EXIS
a
'x?�tbk.•+;�N- r4�r'y-�rj,Y,+r"'++•� '4:J h" "i G"4a -v r _ ayfj
_ ie rt �x���'!�"�����"� a`� � _ _ .,�3i��.�•'t ' -. �� ��,',�ly,F4/,ttF��r'F��1� ,
,c��`+ � .�.,bR .y,;, 'a Ft�e.S'�vx% ,: .,xr?t�,.i�'"�A4�,..`,$"•`�����,,,, _ ,r � �`r�� - -
n a�:� ..+y'�'S ,�� � Ens r 'A. r � 'e, - '4*� � .1"s �Fr �� i b !✓y r'j'�'- ,h•,.r•( �
-LIMITS OF
ADJUST EXIST. CB DEPTH CONS CTION
'a~ - C -
PROP. CONC. SWPE V
ED"ES 'A
_ p
R SS l E,
: E..
LIMITS OF TEXTURED SW - t�- c
PROPERTY LEDETERMINED r ,
BY THCITY OFSALEM ' „ R1 5�; N _ f7R4P V
T R3-.1
. . s': SNS s_
R 171-
w
R5-1 ,, .,
PROP. WCR # 8
PROP. CONC. SW
R7-1 R x PROP. MEDIAN
TM SEE SHEET 2 R4-7 T�Mp3J
a, R1 -1
3 ADJUST EXIST. MH TO AVOID PROP. CURB
PROP. 8 CONC. PIPE gYEL
CHANGE EXIST. CB TO MH "SYEL =a. - 6' CROSSWALK (TYP.)
LIMITS OF COLDPLANE R4-7
AND OVERLAY 2 12' J� P') -
o
i SWEL SWEL SWEL
PROP. CONC. SW
- 8' PARKING LANE (TYP.)
w
oa t ,
F ,r R7-1 L----
aM#� PROP. GRASS STRIP
r _
1 1
PROP. CONC. SW
y M= LIMITS OF COLDPLANE
PROP. WCR
c AND ER Y # O
PROP. WCR # 1
a�
PROP. GRASS STRIP
T
70O
O i
Q) NOTES PROP. WCR
0 1 . THE FOLLOWING WORK SHALL BE DONE WITHIN THE FUTURE PEDESTRIAN PAVILION TO KEEP ----
THE AREA FREE DRAINING OVER THE SIDEWALK UNTIL WORK IS DONE BY OTHERS:
REMOVAL OF EXISTING STREET PAVEMENT, THE EXISTING CURB SHALL REMAIN.
V) GRADE THE AREA TO FREELY DRAIN OVER THE PROPOSED SIDEWALK
o, ADJUST ALL MH AND GATE BOXES TO THE PROPOSED GRADE MEET EXISTING 10
0 PLACE 4" OF LOAM
SPREAD SEED AND HAY MULCH 0 10 20 50
co
N ,•� i 1 WA Y F,
o SCALE IN FEET
N
SCALE DRAWING No.
Lj DRAWN JRM C &C CONSULTING ENGINEERS , LLC
cn 1 "=10' CITY OF SALEM JRM
CHECKED JJG
DATE 214 LINCOLN STREET CONGRESS , WARD , PEABODY STREETS GENERAL PLAN
BOSTON , MASSACHUSETTS INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS
No. DATE REVISION APPROVED MAR 05 20428
--
Is 70
9e.
'* 4'x6' GUARD 1 rYl6aE,N TREE1
o' 1 GRAPHIC SCALE HOUSE
RAISED CONCRETE PAD I CHAIN LINK
FENCE (6-HIGH) 1 MASS STRIP .,�.
AE ` 1
(DAMAGED TREE) `9' 10 o s 10 20 40 N
(
n.n 1 �
- x ,0 7l �
S 7g 3$104 FREft No o2. 1 ^ DOD
`` A"ro''Nc CCM 1 .Il.00 '� PARIONIS ` b`
rE w x IN FEET SIQ1 ✓\ i
'ut dee� � ( ) G:
LP `� _ �J..._ 1 inch = 10 ft END OF --- 6 TREE
- x CONCRETE ,.'� -�
ASpK,I WALL. START 1
ALr WALL END- GATE FENCE CHAIN WROUGHTIRON FENCELINKL loss
POST 1
3'MAPLE 0 GATE NON-TANGENT 1 19.
9. I 1111?
MH 1-1
1Rpy0UGHT POST
1,.33
OE
A
' sl C ,WALL END ASPHALT PARKING LOT
sit END A � EIGHT SUMAC 1 1 $'LIAPLE ri
e 49%A1T _Z:Z:_O • 099 TREES S' TO 16,`-,; 1 SIGN Y�
�• AY VGC ,�. DIAMETER ;� I
1 10 o
2.19 CURB WT F'qQ� END � __. .. � ,.-., 1
ITER LKNEAY `i2.' \"'�STAAI
9,5
v3 OSMH G/ .:.ice �E>£ A, 1 /,(,�
END OF
y4 6'MAPLE A0. (yB.,lq� + _ ,. / /i / / /� % WROUGHT
/�`//�% / GG O IRON FENCE
p. ��� 1 3'SUMMAC ; /� �� �/ ' ' 1�- , n
�'� 1o.ro' / / // 7 /, / / oe RAMP
I'm _E
SJs' a4G - EAPO s.s, SAS II `` ` LP h�R`^" RAM ''o x✓ / X / / .,,.3o 11 END CURB-CONCRETE
\
flaw 3MH mew 9991 2 Vcc
E10
MH�.. O AFKf ` ,. 1.1. VOC FLUSH
1 1
y �\� t w/PAVEIM 1aft
„,.� m.as tole AWAIT .A.
�\ SEW, 91" s'a 3'MAPLE NDN-TANGENT um I �1 074
ST
04* AST..._ oe� m.3e �' 1 I OMH
/ \ \ ONE A3
W DEWS MH _
v Us ,,CONCRETE _
FOUR , 1 I
STORY �u.as�� .,Geo _ / 119 BGG •' " I � END
BRICK -
VGC
APT. / \
BUILDING �. _ \` ,4ss7" e.,a�'e I 11 11 m.5e RAMP LP
loss
+ �1
a.
1M
+ Lae la.ea ° 9.wOSMNH _ _ % 1
- ACl SY 11-1 _ I GRASS STRIP
9.5r NO
+ EASTING-ASPHALT PARKING PARKING
\ (SEVERAL DEPRESSED AREAS OF SETTLED.ASPHALT) ,o.a. SIGN gg
9.9I NOT
10, ENTER V6 3 0
SIGN
se
}' v i09a ni9� S7g ' 9.31 Q97
+ � ' /
ONE STORY one 0146� 9.m e. / � 010't3 EMH SMH
r� Q BRICK STUCCO / 9 S1,00,
BUILDING
T
\ ... '� I N FFE-11.79 LI 10.],. _
j .1215 V O � 991
M
moi/ lim T GRASS AREA IN
. e \ •I.a. '�. oma j Kt RAISED BED W 10.1 -
.1zn . . RR.TIE RET. WAIL ppddd • 970. wOS..S.W.W.Ion
_ GRASS AREA IN ' R EMH OWG
ie.� % RAISED BED REL .moo
.TIE T. WAI]y% 1 7 I
pMH 1�
`l
-_ -._.-=.4'HIGH CHAIN UBA FENCE / 9.w - I Z PAINTED mu /
-BACK EDGE OF CONCRETE SIDEWALK :, .'i I11 ; IoM ,11 1 \ NO tf
GATE -$89�19'30'W� JLC x - ._ x z-x y .-, Jl�^x-:JL- PARKING OSIdH STOP e7 /
lex ,- � /
/ M#2 89.19'30'W os9 49.08' oel AREA OSIN�®071 / aes I BM13
EMH DRUIII (RUGAL)
1`�' CONCRETE SIDEWALK ASPHALT WALK WG
(BADLY CRACKED) ® 9.w 1040 oss 1000Omsa i
n°5 ..0 1. 7 1 - 9.m S.W.W.
- ^ - �.. Y(.'O 12.01 law BIT.CONC. GRtBNO, ,03. CBvw
START BC OSMH
END VOC � GH
FOR
PLANTER mo �` 1
STREET SMH QMH _
WARD I93� EMH
i I s SHETLAND
.uz3 I 01°-s" // I PARK
Oil/ SIGN
/ S.W.W.
/ mw5
/
ONE WAY /
s.w.w. OS
,osA1H /
I' CONCRETE-
END RAISED _V,GC RU / EIA RAISED END END 0 o"I W FRONT OF _
END WALKWAY
I.s, VGC CURB END PARK
:i WITH PAVEMENT VOC CURB , SMHO VOC 1 VI
- O 12..70 i0.w 10.32 mss GUTTER UNE �� 9.w VCC to 2.5 ,o.w LME 9,. i�x 10.1 VGC �aa5 io.4z L:,: i�, I SHETLAND
VOC 1 41. .,.' . 1120 UP -1047CURB CUT FOR DRIVEWAY GRAVEL U�"� // I BUILDING
11.,5 10.02. 10.>0 i0ee
90 tn3 CURB CUT FOR DRIVEWAY a I FOR DRIVEWAY mSzQQ 1O. CONCRETE SIDEWALK _ t
CURB CUT 1 ,I
' - LA�:3a .^'I 4'.33 SIDEWALK -
GG TOP SPINDLE WG 1 CONCRETE.� CONCRETE SIDEWALK _
� ` ON HYD=14.73 '�
055
CONCRETE- �4� n.za OG❑MMITTIER CONCRETE SIDEWALK( .rov -
BM#1
N89'10'SB'E a
(B
CURB
I \ \ c CONCRETE OURS ,zea N89'10 58 E- SII-�oe'9�-`x�x- /j .' ✓ 0' .\ O}MH _
38 0
I357 - / % / �b.95
ia.i9 vr, i CHAIN LRM / / BACK OF CdICRETE SSIEWAI.K1,90 1498 ; ,, moi' / w W5/MINO / �� . .AAu /i//., // /iii /� '�fA. / i BARB NIKE +2.79 3 AREA I FF£ ,Lm. I � ul �IlOs S'A �BRICK '/ ASPNALT - / 3ACONCRET- ,o RAMP' ,//
`CONCRETE BURDINO ONE STORY METAL BLINDING I ONE STORY METAL 11 MG SIDEWALK
CURB / MARCH 3 MARTIN, RIC. MARCH h MARTIN, MC. / GRAVEL PARKING LOT COINCIDES
STOCKADE ( K'w) LINEPROPIRTY
i
FENCE
E [ Y EMH /
.. 1 •.Y ii {'),�' 4 .6 •� �/ IFF... / / .12.29 \
.-✓ ' ` .'. S8l2m
iI .•i Com a 4 •� crvlL / / �UP
oK 11-lo -
� �� � NQ 3,7666
.. a. t END
1TO6IDEN TREE
f] k
W� y� 41150
- y�P GRASM STRIP "..
/ O
AROUND TREE
EXISTING CONDITIONS 2.
NOTES
"""by.. PLAN OF LAND GAS METER
- ;� O .
g
4 !* r ,�.�\ . jUHARP,Oft 5T M -` ��'• �s for an intersection located at rf 1. EXISTING CONDITIONS AND TOPOGRAPHY PER ACTUAL FIELD
SURVEY USING A TOTAL STATION AND DATA COLLECTOR, �' c WALL - I ,END S
T 'Mill �_ 1 ' ` and Street Peabody Street _
I �C 1 W jT � I s TOP OF WALL ELEV. 1U.7. _13- - 11,7
J CONCRETE BLOCK RETAINING
,.. �T)50111# 1 OCTOBER, 1999.
a t �g I 2. PROPERTY LINE PER NORTH SHORE SURVEY CORPORATION. 0•UIQEN TREE,
e r f , 'r\• KI & Congress Street MULCHED et]) RR ,TES ': .- MULCHED BED ORA561'D STRIP. -
a 3. BENCHMARK FOR VERTICAL CONTROL (NOT SHOWN ON
THIS
\
I; £ �r THIS PLAN USCS&GS STANDARD TIDAL BENCHMARK DISK
.11f� , �Ohy POiI?� �� � � ale 111 Mas � 2.0 ��S e ttw7 SET VERTICALLY IN WALL OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF % � o � 'END � 2
I THE U.S. CUSTOM HOUSE ON DERBY STREET, ELEVATION O I vGC m
i;.3 ;� >✓ t altonst all ` J '" /i;o OD
- t?1Gt+`' Prepared for: The City of Salem Planning Department 13.69 (NGVD). J ASPHALT PARKING ASPHALT PARKRM
P' }Jn`' �KCKµSl c/o Mr. Donald Giard, One Salem Green, Salem, MA 01970 /
TEMPOARY BENCHMARKS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN AS FOLLOWS %% c
n' Date: October 25, 1999 / M
Y AI' .� { (BASED ON NGVD):
CH
Palmer - PLDE #99-41 Scale. 1 = 10 Sheet 1 Of 1 NATION 11 11 PK NAIL SET IN CONCRETE - -- --
P �]t .,
/ - _
g 2 �3
TBM y1: ELEVATION %/, �c �
_ _ - - PATR OWI C Z SIDEWALK , RR _ U, 2
TBM 2' NATION - 11.45 PK NAIL SET IN CONCRETE
TIES
J C i ♦ D
v ♦ 1 S }
SIDEWALK MULCHED BED o A H
r .» i , LAND DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING TBM #3: ELEVATION = 10.79 PK NAIL SET IN PAVEMENT _
0 2000 60 Washington Street, Salem, MA 01970 t 9
LOCUS GRAPHIC I (978)745-2288
LL
a
RETAINING CW CHAIN FENSCALE: 1"=2000 gCf1E
J
EJ
P
I� I�I