The URL can be used to link to this page

11 RIVER STREET - R-2 ANN KNIGHT - BUILDING INSPECTION 1.1 River St. R=2 a Ann Knight . _ I //77/iilll�UlllllGG No. 153L-2 HASTINGS. MN LOS ANGELES-CHICAGo•LoGAN,oH' MCGREGOR.TX-LOCUST GROVE.GA U.S.A. (-a 1 -t r a 109V - f I r f , - R'EOwcoP �� . �X 4 IZ�l7WCol� TaP� �3ooTa M IZ f�11 - w� 150 1 x I Eb6 '�5 ZXC7 R r FIOOR4x4 R l oo� sTS I� ( 0,c ST � Lr- s 4 OCT I l i 36 Atli '91 CITY OF '�-kS5 CL[Fn'S I,F�ICE DEC f zxt7- S-TAtt, STRIN6 {�$ 4x4 P.T SOUTH EL� V�T16N ;XISTNG STRUCTvikF- Ropj- s:c: 6" o. t— f�+ In- SCALR Y" _ 1 - 6I if - - KN I P-i. T Pr �1 � OCT 18 1136 At! X91 CITY OF S--.I-UL HASS CLERK'S OFFICE L S�Pr ... 4x4 P,T SOUTH EL� V�TM EXISTING STRUCTVi« PRop(jsE p"E C,IK a 1 7A r j 6" o. i-- SCALA 1 w S c of\-A TfT Z),x 4 R;Dwocc� ToP� 13ooTa M OFvF-LE 0 EbG E.S Ax6, RT FIOOK 4X4 P, l �ois �S 12" O,C� Fos7gs r+c,tio(t S ST OCT 18 !1 36 M '91 CITY OF LAL FM, MASS CLERK'S 0` CE 1. ;Lx(. f SrRIN6�{Z$ �: yx9 f,T SOUTH � L� V�T6N �kISTNG STRuCTViKE K STA77 Tr?,� -- - -- -- _ ----- ------- l r o. s�M';�5C SCALA �" __ aII - .J :y y R�pwc�P CSP . scop :.x 4 CZpwco� TOP-�- �3ooTa M F-{m--. w/ BEvF-LE C) lza+LU 57E R Ebb �5 Ax6 RT FICOR 4x4 P, l LE l ST , L M PLOT PLAN OF LAND IN SALEM, MASS. , SCALE: 1"=20 ' OCT DATE: SEPT. 23, 1991 NOTE: This plan was compiled by a tape survey CITY OF HASS and Not an instrument survey, therefore all CE ,I prflCE offsets shown are approximate. BAYSTATE SURVEYING SERVICE, INC. , 234 CABOT STREET, BEVERLY, MASS. , �N OF y SO'IR S No. 26094 1oc afOf TL9% 3?,6?1 It GO J GV+YIgIn nn 1" L� r m 6o2 - e � foLac- 6 0 4- � �4 %Z Srf n!e Oho I I N t of 36' -- r11 �/E� �TRCET w U PLOT PLAN OF LAND IN SALEM, MASS. , SCALE: 1"=20' OCT3T 1.1TE: SEPT. 23, 1991 EJJ ,JJ'' NOTE: This plan was compiled by a tape survey CITY OF SA E". MASS AP CLERK'S OFFIOEand Not an instrument survey, therefore all offsets shown are approximate. BAYSTATE SURVEYING SERVICE, INC. , 234 CABOT STREET, BEVERLY, MASS. , J Et, SOTIROS ^ o No, 26084 oe 33.6-11 �S,c 19 r-- �nw�fTrrn : 8 v h1 _ n� L—r 6c2 N L� r 6 o 4- I V2 -1V2 I � {� l VEC-Z �T crc w U PLOT PLAN OF LAND IN SALEM, MASS. , _ SCALE: 1"=20 ' DATE: SEPT. 23, 1991 NOTE: This plan was compiled by a tape survey and Not an instrument survey, therefore all offsets shown are approximate. BAYSTATE SURVEYING SERVICE, INC. , 234 CABOT STREET, BEVERLY, MASS. , Of �s J E SOTIROS No. 26094 AFCISif4E� JS�N1( LAN05� 33,6'7 'D c lS" is -602 . b Lc-r 6 4- c� „ e I i 3611 -- -7 r-z E:;—r —T2CE w 11-04-91.06:48:34.67806-LE GK A i I- CITY OF SALEM BOARD OF APPEAL 745-9595 Ext. 381 Will hold a public hearing for all persons inter- ested in the petition submitted by Ann H.Knight for a Special Permit to extend porch at 11 River St. (R-2). Said hearing to be held Wednesday, November 20,1991 at 7:00 P.M.,One Salem Green, 2nd floor. RICHARD A. BENCAL, Chairman November 6, 13, 1991 SN67806 If 11-04-91.06:48-34 67806-LE �-04-91.06:48:34.67806-LEGK ' CITY OF SALEM b CITY OF SALEM • ,BOARD OF APPEAL - BOARD OF APPEAL745-9595 Ext. 381 .., hold a 745-9595 Ext. 381 Will hold a public hearing for all persons inter- Will the petittilon submitgledrbylnn persons Kn ght for a Special d in the Peition rmit toextendpo ch at 11;R ver . for a Special Permit to ext end porch at11River St. (R-2). Said hearing to be held Wednesday, St. (R-2). Said hearing to be held Wednesday, floor. November 20,1991 at 7:00 P.M.,One Salem Green, November 20, 1991 at 7:00 P.M.,One Salem Green, 2nd • j'2nd floor. + RICHARD A: BENGAL, Chairman November 6, 13,, 199RD A. BENGAL, Chairman 1 November 6, 13, 1991 I � SN67906 -�• .. SN67806 _ i 11-04-91.06748:34.67806-LEGK 11-04-91.06:48:34.67806-LEGK CITY OF SALEM - CITY OF SALEM BOARD OF APPEAL BOARD OF APPEAL 745-9595 Ext. 381 - 745-9595 Ext. 381 Will hold a public hearing for all persons inter- Will hold a public hearing for all persons inter- ested in the petition submitted by Ann H.Knight ested in the petition submitted by Ann H.Knight for a Special Permit to extend porch at. 11 River for a Special Permit to extend porch at 11 River SL (R-2). Said hearing to be held Wednesday, St. (R-2). Said hearing to be held Wednesday, November 20,1991 at 7:00 P.M.,One Salem Green, November 20,1991 at 7:00 P.M.,One Salem Green, 2nd floor. 2nd floor. RICHARD A. BENGAL, Chairman RICHARD A. BENGAL, Chairman November 6, 13, 1991 SN67806 November 6, 13, 1991 Y APPEAL CASE NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (1li#g of 5aletn, fflttssadjusetts s paurb of A"rzd TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS: The Undersigne*represent that he is are the owners of a certain parcel of land looted at NO. . . . . !!. . . !Y. C. 7V. .•. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Street; Zoning District. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : and said parcel is affected by Section(s) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . of the Massachusetts State Building Code. Plans describing the work proposed, have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in accordance with Section IX A. l of the Zoning Ordinance. r An �- The Application for Permit was denied by the Inspector of Buildings for the folla�ing reasons: o The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of ttpe Salm Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to— approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero- gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for the following reasons: prltM.T �A �� C'X�and Q/1 eX1,S/7h� poar`�l Owner. . . Address. . . . . . X'/vim S.7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Telephone. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Petitioner. . N. ./l!. . . fJ`: . /(—N/ E. .. . . . . . . . . . . Address. . . . . . . . Date. Telephone./ . . . ./5 4.Q L. / . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . #By. . . . . . +t. . N . . . . . . . . . . . . . Three copies of the application must be filed with the Secretary of the Board of Appeals with a check, for advertising in the amount of. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . four weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals. Check payable to The Evening News. � � � � N0----.--.---,. � � � PETITION T0BOARD 0FAPPEALS LOCATION � --------'------------' � yET|?|0NEK.......................................... � AI}DRE81-------------.,. ' ' ................................................ . � � CONDITIONS � -----~'--------------' ...`................... ..................`.................. .---..-~.^'-,---------'- ' r ' -'~-^.----------------' / ' ----------------`----' � -~^.^`----^^.`-'-----^~~. ~ / PETITION APPROVED.................... �� DENIED....... ................. ~ , .............................................. lY......... � � � , ' � � � � Ctv of ttlem, ��sttchu5e## �'ruaxr. Aire Department �teabquartcre 48 Tarfagctte ,96trret Joseph F. Sullivan *6m, 4M. 01970 Chief City of Salem Date November 20, 1991 Board of Appeal One Salem Green RE: 11 River Street Ann H_ Knight The Salem Fire Department has no objection to the granting of a Special Permit and/or Variance to allow: the extension of an existing porch subject to the following conditions: 1- This property (has no) (tt#trtt) compliance with the provisions of the Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 148, Section 26E, relative to the installation of automatic smoke detectors. T h,1 P, Smkan with Ma_ Knight n this matter and she will be making an appointment for an inspection relative to smoke da actors. 2- Plans for the proposed construction are to be presented to the Salem Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. 3- The proposed construction shall conform to all applicable provisions of the Massa- chusetts State Building Code, the Salem Fire Prevention Code, 527CMR(Code of Massa- chuestts Regulations) , the Salem City Ordinances, and Massachusetts General Laws relative to fire and public safety. 4- The applicant and/or contractor shall arrange for an inspection by the Salem Fire Prevention Bureau upon conpletion of the work. ed, �uv (PO Norman P. LaPointe Fire Inspector cw: file applicant APPEAL CASE NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Citg of ttlem, 'fflttssarlpsetts �,. 'Paurb of �kppral s� TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS: The Undersigned represent that he is are the owners of a certain parcel of land loc ted at NO. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Street; Zoning District. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : and said parcel is affected by Section(s) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . of the Massachusetts State Building Code. Plans describing the work proposed, have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in accordance with Section IX A. l of the Zoning Ordinance. m� x. m`> N n c4 p y O ;z ,?7 3: L� C_] The Application for Permit was denied by the Inspector of Buildings for the =lallew-ing reasons: ? r D re L� N C GJ N The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero- gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for the following reasons: S�eu'al �e� m ' f T eX aarrd an Owner. . 4 !v Address. . .��. . . . !�! !! . . 5�. . . . . . . . . . . . . . Telephone. . .sUe. . . . . . . .7�1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Petitioner. . !� !V . . : . !.!>!t qq Address. . -SM C Date. '.� .L .� S 4--. c. . . . . . . . . S Telephone r.,.,. . . ./.. . gyp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . By. . . . . .(2AU: .!I!.'. .WEU . . . . . . . . . . . . Three copies of the application must be filed with the Secretary of the Board of Appeals with a check, for advertising in the amount of. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . four weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals. Check payable to The Evening News. NO.................................... PETITION TO BOARD OF APPEALS LOCATION ................................................................ PETITIONER.......................................... ADDRESS............................................... ................................................ CONDII IONS ............................ .................................... ........................ ....................................... ................................................................ ......................... ....................................... ......................................................... ................................................................. PETITION APPROVED.................... ❑ DENIED......................... .................................................... 19......... OCT I B I I r i '91 CIT'. SS 1 � I I I I i � I ' � i j l I I I ax6S.YP. %t2 5-7J1R — STRING�-7V3 - r-, 4x4 P,T SOUTH! � V�TM EkISTNG STRUCTUiK « / PRO DSL- r o. i= 1"" it SCALA KSI H711T R qi , nFNi ( REOwcO CSP . ax 4 CZlxl�wcotJ TOP G007Z)M R \� -_ w/ 15') 1 x 1 BEvF-LE 0 C2RLL\ s7E R EbG '-r5 ,zx� P,T FlboR 4x4 RT �oiSTS 1�` O,C� POS-C S -ST , L M PLOT PLAN OF LAND IN SALEM, MASS. , SCALE: 1"=20 ' DATE: SEPT. 23, 1991 OCTI U if a ati �I NOTE: This plan was compiled by a tape survey GIl ;"SS and Not an instrument survey, therefore all offsets shown are approximate. BAYSTATE SURVEYING SERVICE, INC. , 234 CABOT STREET, BEVERLY, MASS. , 1H OF Nq� GN SOTIR S • `^ No. 26004 0� Lrz� .J l 8 I i _ m 6a2 L�-r 6 0 4- t� r �4 V2 Sr vin N VI 1 Nr I I w U I off•,\EP / � � /'�� °' �� c35 9° i.2/ AC i1/ � i �a i Z \ �/ 36 e49cr)�• `3 .?'� _ 616 617 612 4905 38a0 4,500 4,292 636 610 < 700 625 a°2 0 'ter ., 1.sp 9 615 s 43 623 624 lit zs RIVE�,f�s_it'hTSTREET „GG 6 m . 3+ �Vy :03�� 10300 /1790 J 2. 604 ] 6 s 600 Z 3r Iq t ❑ 5'3\ `�' 8 599 90 bG0 a `•� in 59 1 v U - o I s.+6 5,134 e• o — ". � S 580 , I + . STREET 6;;qG z •, � = t ,1i 6 06oVER IVA 9 505 ez �OQ� i7,018 s ° JOB C:Do ' y.c� ` ❑�9�� STG •�• �• ^�O� J 7.350 g76 m; 0 19 •'<�-;: �_�'. 511 �.G9 _7 ,1a Sq Sg •2 . �2 30 �.` 1 _ •44 V � 3rLo1 ?. . 2. : Z " 5 12. oil 7i7 'jQ 1 575 '° p qs S cr .x a 5 a 5 528 „ F13 cD O 514 u 4100 y�6 �2 u - 5 <0 0 v :5^ 515 ��• �� e 546 Q '524 vI mj j 518 (IT Citi of �iiem, � I� ttchuSP#t� Xire Department ceaDyvarfcra ueMr 48 '={gate ,*trret Joseph F. Sullivan aS'Virm, 4M. 01970 Chief City of Salem Date: November 20, 1991 Board of Appeal One Salem Green RE: 11 River Street Ann H_ Knight The Salem Fire Department has no objection to the granting of a Special Permit and/or Variance to allow: the extension of an existingporch subject to the follaaing conditions: 1- This property (has no) (t**#9) compliance with the provisions of the Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 148, Section 26E, relative to the installation of automatic simke detectors. T haue spoken with Mg- Kn igtt on thi-, mat*Ar and she wit 1 be making. an n amintmant for an ingzrnntirn relative tri smake deeteGhn_r _ 2- Plans for the proposed construction are to be presented to the Salem Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. 3- The proposed construction shall conform to all applicable provisions of the Massa- chusetts State Building Code, the Salem Fire Prevention Code, 527CMR(Code of Massa- chuestts Regulations) , the Salem City Ordinances, and Massachusetts General Laws relative to fire and public safety. 4- The applicant and/or contractor shall arrange for an inspection by the Salem Fire Prevention Bureau upon eonpletion of the worts. Norman P. LaPointe Fire Inspector cc: file applicant .,S -5 oFellf 1h Q o o r Yl C La, t F eat eL l r O rf- I 12 I.1\ S r-oPoSCJ F-4(f' x-e c41,G_rvl- pd,c-L u-,im 31 e Incrc�rSc r s ze ` ue� �c-Q h(,� its V" s1 •rn �.I Q-r1 Gv (rL,wj (l I1 rl 0+ S�•iL�? n'r l'�C_cd_...("1'� .� in ��rrc-"c `+1L C�r S'I� �� h o n Lo r1'Yarr�� l ) JI `mac_ b u; `J; e4i , Un 1� .5. , ✓I'�`- O (`�� M bs+I I r O T �(I `-tom �,e'7�l 'h Prat �os�,(J� IhlPrOT -I �-C_. (l�1CQh�Grl'lbd�• —rte _- rvu +I-e— ri CsA Th 6ti1 5 4-17 Oa»C/' S.h�� b � •1 W'CL. Cc:�P rte" o� a`7 . .� _______ _:_.___ ..____ __Y..__.____._.._._._��__. _._.Y__.,r._ _ _ _. __,� _.._ �_._____._.__. . . .,. _ __ __d_ _.__.___.._._... �...r - �_ �__._;. _. ___ _.. r - . __�.__ _. _ _ _ .__ -- _ _ ._. _ _____�__�� __.__.r _ _ -_ _ _ _ -- .- _ __-__ _. •� .�,: .. ..r _..« _ � _ _ w .._� J� a � �.. . ..__ . _v_ a __.._. ._ . .. .., �__ ._. _. �__ �... __...�. .. . . _ _ _ z ofttlem, � ttsstttljusetts s bnnra of Au}rezd ICY t i 1.w.' �Ni r.Wn T'- JJ DECISION ON THE PETITION OF ANN KNIGHT FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 11 RIVER ST. (R-2) A hearing on this petition was held November 20, 1991 with the following Board Members present: Richard Bencal, Chairman; Richard Febonio, Edward Luzinski, Mary Jane Stirgwolt. and Associate Member Ronald Plante. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioner, owner of the property, is requesting a Special Permit to extend an existing porch. The property is located in an R-2 district. The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this request for a Special Permit is Section 5-3(j ) , which provides as follows: Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set forth in Sections 8-6 and 9-4, grant Special Permits for alterations and reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and for changes, enlargement, extension or expansion of nonconforming lots, land, structures, and uses, provided, however, that such change, extension, enlargement or expansion shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming use to the neighborhood. In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit requests, guided by the rule that a Special Permit will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1. The existing porch is in poor conditons and is in need of repair or replacement. DECISION ON THE PETITION OF ANN KNIGHT FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 11 RIVER STREET, SALEM page two };pY L 2. The proposed replacement porch will line.,-;up with the ex�zsting structure and will therefore be more compatible-than the existing porch. 3. The increase in size requested by the petitioner is very small and will not significantly increase the existing nonconformity of the building on the site. 4. The abutter at 7 River St. , the property most affected by this construction, spoke in favor of the petition. 5. The proposed porch will not have a negative impact on the neighborhood. 6. The petitioner has already received the approval of the Historical Commission. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1. The granting of the Special Permit will requested will not be substantially detrimental to the public good and will not nullify or substantially derogate from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. 2. The Special Permit requested can be granted in harmony with the district and will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously,5-0, to grant the Special Permit requested, subject to the following conditions: 1. The petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, ordinances, codes and regulations. 2. All requirements of the City of Salem Fire Prevention Bureau relative to smoke and fire safety shall be strictly adhered to. 3. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted. 4. All construction is to be done with a legal building permit 5. The petitioner shall obtain the approval of any City Board or Commission that has jurisdiction over this petition. DECISION ON THE PETITION OF ANN KNIGHT FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT FOR 11 RIVER STREET, SALEM page three kiDY �1 2 iD •f..i '911 ;Gj z a S SPECIAL PERMIT GRANTEDNIL November 20, 1991 Mary,/j 4 e Stirgwol Member Board of Appeal A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of MGL Chapter 40A and shall be filed withing 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to MGL, CHAPTER 40A, Section 11, the variance or special permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision, bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that is has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name or the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. l (Gita of Iem, �Eazsarljuseits Boarb af �Av �IJ I ' Li --U \ ~ lpeal DECISION ON THE PETITION OF ANN KNIGHT FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 11 RIVER ST. (R-2) A hearing on this petition was held November 20, 1991 with the following Board Members present: Richard Bencal, Chairman; Richard Febonio, Edward Luzinski, Mary Jane Stirgwolt. and Associate Member Ronald Plante. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioner, owner of the property, is requesting a Special Permit to extend an existing porch. The property is located in an R-2 district. The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this request for a Special Permit is Section 5-3(j ) , which provides as follows: Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set forth in Sections 8-6 and 9-4, grant Special Permits for alterations and reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and for changes, enlargement, extension or expansion of nonconforming lots, land, structures, and uses, provided, however, that such change, extension, enlargement or expansion shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming use to the neighborhood. In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit requests, guided by the rule that a Special Permit will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1. The existing porch is in poor conditons and is in need of repair or replacement. J DECISION ON THE PETITION OF ANN KNIGHT FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 11 RIVER STREET, SALEM page twoL� ' 2 - i =U 2. The proposed replacement porch will line,„up.with the exi=sting structure and will therefore be more compatible-than the existing porch. 3. The increase in size requested by the petitioner is very small and will not significantly increase the existing nonconformity of the building on the site. 4. The abutter at 7 River St. , the property most affected by this construction, spoke in favor of the petition. 5. The proposed porch will not have a negative impact on the neighborhood. 6. The petitioner has already received the approval of the Historical Commission. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1. The granting of the Special Permit will requested will not be substantially detrimental to the public good and will not nullify or substantially derogate from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. 2. The Special Permit requested can be granted in harmony with the district and will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously,5-0, to grant the Special Permit requested, subject to the following conditions: 1. The petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, ordinances, codes and regulations. 2. All requirements of the City of Salem Fire Prevention Bureau relative to smoke and fire safety shall be strictly adhered to. 3. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted. 4. All construction is to be done with a legal building permit 5. The petitioner shall obtain the approval of any City Board or Commission that has jurisdiction over this petition. DECISION ON THE PETITION OF ANN KNIGHT FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT FOR 11 RIVER STREET, SALEM page three iki Zi 2 �:'D iii '911 CT"> SS SPECIAL PERMIT GRANTED November 20, 1991 Mary,/ �rYe 5tirgwol , Member Board of Appeal A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of MGL Chapter 40A and shall be filed withing 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to MGL, CHAPTER 40A, Section 11, the variance or special permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision, bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that is has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name or the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. r ;b z, (EitU of -,-$ttlem, �fttssacIlusetto 'Boarb o{ �c 1IT�Te211 f0Y Li .0 C;; JJ , SS DECISION ON THE PETITION OF ANN KNIGHT FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 11 RIVER ST. (R-2) A hearing on this petition was held November 20, 1991 with the following Board Members present: Richard Bencal, Chairman; Richard Febonio, Edward Luzinski, Mary Jane Stirgwolt. and Associate Member Ronald Plante. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioner, owner of the property, is requesting a Special Permit to extend an existing porch. The property is located in an R-2 district. The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this request for a Special Permit is Section 5-3(j ) , which provides as follows: Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set forth in Sections 8-6 and 9-4, grant Special Permits for alterations and reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and for changes, enlargement, extension or expansion of nonconforming lots, land, structures, and uses, provided, however, that such change, extension, enlargement or expansion shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming use to the neighborhood. In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit requests, guided by the rule that a Special Permit will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1. The existing porch is in poor conditons and is in need of repair or replacement. DECISION ON THE PETITION OF ANN KNIGHT FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 11 RIVER STREET, SALEM page two spy L i' 2 2. The proposed replacement porch will linle,up. with the exi-ting structure and will therefore be more compatible.-than the existing porch. 3. The increase in size requested by the petitioner is very small and will not significantly increase the existing nonconformity of the building on the site. 4. The abutter at 7 River St. , the property most affected by this construction, spoke in favor of the petition. 5. The proposed porch will not have a negative impact on the neighborhood. 6. The petitioner has already received the approval of the Historical Commission. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1. The granting of the Special Permit will requested will not be substantially detrimental to the public good and will not nullify or substantially derogate from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. 2. The Special Permit requested can be granted in harmony with the district and will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously,5-0, to grant the Special Permit requested, subject to the following , conditions: 1. The petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, ordinances, codes and regulations. 2. All requirements of the City of Salem Fire Prevention Bureau relative to smoke and fire safety shall be strictly adhered to. 3. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted. 4. All construction is to be done with a legal building permit 5. The petitioner shall obtain the approval of any City Board or Commission that has jurisdiction over this petition. DECISION ON THE PETITION OF ANN KNIGHT FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT FOR 11 RIVER STREET, SALEM page three ib 2 aD .i'.i ':9.1 SS SPECIAL PERMIT GRANTED „- November 20, 1991 Mary, die Stirgwol Member Board of Appeal A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of MGL Chapter 40A' and shall be filed withing 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to MGL, CHAPTER 40A, Section 11, the variance or special permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision, bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that is has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name or the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. Cts of rzlem, � ttssttdiusetts 39nttra of A,rpeal i10Y L1 2 c-u r„ DECISION ON THE PETITION OF ANN KNIGHT FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 11 RIVER ST. (R-2) A hearing on this petition was held November 20, 1991 with the following Board Members present: Richard Bencal, Chairman; Richard Febonio, Edward Luzinski, Mary Jane Stirgwolt. and Associate Member Ronald Plante. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioner, owner of the property, is requesting a Special Permit to extend an existing porch. The property is located in an R-2 district. The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this request for a Special Permit is Section 5-3(j ) , which provides as follows: Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set forth in Sections 8-6 and 9-4, grant Special Permits for alterations and reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and for changes, enlargement, extension or expansion of nonconforming lots, land, structures, and uses, provided, however, that such change, extension, enlargement or expansion shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming use to the neighborhood. In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit requests, guided by the rule that a Special Permit will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1. The existing porch is in poor conditons and is in need of repair or replacement. DECISION ON THE PETITION OF ANN KNIGHT FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 11 RIVER STREET, SALEM page two hflY 2. The proposed replacement porch will line,„up with the eii4;ting structure and will therefore be more compatible than the existing porch. 3. The increase in size requested by the petitioner is very small and will not significantly increase the existing nonconformity of the building on the site. 4. The abutter at 7 River St. , the property most affected by this construction, spoke in favor of the petition. 5. The proposed porch will not have a negative impact on the neighborhood. 6. The petitioner has already received the approval of the Historical Commission. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1. The granting of the Special Permit will requested will not be substantially detrimental to the public good and will not nullify or substantially derogate from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. 2. The Special Permit requested can be granted in harmony with the district and will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously,5-0, to grant the Special Permit requested, subject to the following conditions: 1. The petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, ordinances, codes and regulations. 2. All requirements of the City of Salem Fire Prevention Bureau relative to smoke and fire safety shall be strictly adhered to. 3. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted. 4. All construction is to be done with a legal building permit 5. The petitioner shall obtain the approval of any City Board or Commission that has jurisdiction over this petition. DECISION ON THE PETITION OF ANN KNIGHT FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT FOR 11 RIVER STREET, SALEM page three Fbw ,(I 2 50 r.i.! .91 SPECIAL PERMIT GRANTED , November 20, 1991 �Ma y/) die Stirgwol , Member Board of Appeal A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of MGL Chapter 40A and shall be filed withing 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to MGL, CHAPTER 40A, Section 11, the variance or special permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision, bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that is has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name or the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. / b (Cittl of -,'julem, �lussutljusetts 33nttra of ��u�rettl +CY Li 2 DECISION ON THE PETITION OF ANN KNIGHT FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 11 RIVER ST. (R-2) A hearing on this petition was held November 20, 1991 with the following Board Members present: Richard Bencal, Chairman; Richard Febonio, Edward Luzinski, Mary Jane Stirgwolt. and Associate Member Ronald Plante. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioner, owner of the property, is requesting a Special Permit to extend an existing porch. The property is located in an R-2 district. The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this request for a Special Permit is Section 5-3(j ) , which provides as follows: Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set forth in Sections 8-6 and 9-4, grant Special Permits for alterations and reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and for changes, enlargement, extension or expansion of nonconforming lots, land, structures, and uses, provided, however, that such change, extension, enlargement or expansion shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming use to the neighborhood. In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit requests, guided by the rule that a Special Permit will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1. The existing porch is in poor conditons and is in need of repair or replacement. DECISION ON THE PETITION OF ANN KNIGHT FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 11 RIVER STREET, SALEM page two }LD1' L i 2. The proposed replacement porch will lin�!; up,with the eki�ting structure and will therefore be more compatible_than the existing porch. 3. The increase in size requested by the petitioner is very small and will not significantly increase the existing nonconformity of the building on the site. 4. The abutter at 7 River St. , the property most affected by this construction, spoke in favor of the petition. 5. The proposed porch will not have a negative impact on the neighborhood. 6. The petitioner has already received the approval of the Historical Commission. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1. The granting of the Special Permit will requested will not be substantially detrimental to the public good and will not nullify or substantially derogate from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. 2. The Special Permit requested can be granted in harmony with the district and will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously,5-0, to grant the Special Permit requested, subject to the following conditions: 1. The petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, ordinances, codes and regulations. 2. All requirements of the City of Salem Fire Prevention Bureau relative to smoke and fire safety shall be strictly adhered to. 3. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted. 4. All construction is to be done with a legal building permit 5. The petitioner shall obtain the approval of any City Board or Commission that has jurisdiction over this petition. DECISION ON THE PETITION OF ANN KNIGHT FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT FOR 11 RIVER STREET, SALEM page three &12-1 2 S SPECIAL PERMIT GRANTED _ November 20, 1991 Mary,/ 'j e tirgwol , Member Board of Appeal A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of MGL Chapter 40A and shall be filed withing 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to MGL, CHAPTER 40A, Section 11, the variance or special permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision, bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that is has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name or the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. DATE OF HEARING PETITIONER LOCATION MOTION: TO GRANT / SECOND_�� TO DENY SECOND TO RE-HEAR SECOND LEAVE TO WITHDRAW SECOND TO CONTINUE SECOND ROLL CALL PRESENT GRAN,T DENY WITHDRAW RE-HEAR CONTINUE RICHARD BENCAL V TI_ RICHARD` FEBONIO EDWARD LUZINSKI / MARY JANE STIRGWOLT ASSOCIATE MEMBERS RONALD PLANT ARTHUR LABRECOUE CONDITIONS: / /v �Ii