20 RAWLINS STREET - BUILDING INSPECTION OL _602M"r
\,n
&WcuGiue C 0/:1-a/�Cc ,/94
Aa& _0Boa4d o f Aa A7a"�,o a and JCanda"
Michael Dukakis �Zol7oxmaa� /&& (VAW Q dc/
Governor """"�
Kentaro Tsutsumi &&n, /Wamao"eff4 02-108
Chairman
(617) 727-3200
Charles J. Dinezio
Administrator
MEMORANDUM
TO: All Building Departments/State Building Inspectors
FROM: Charles J. Dinezio, Administrator
DATE: October 31, 1988
SUBJECT: MGI, c40, S54, Added By c584, S9 of the Acts of 1987
The above-mentioned statute requires that debris resulting from the demolition, renovation, rehabilitation
or other alteration of a building or structure be disposed of in a properly licensed solid waste disposal
facility as defined by MGL clll, S150A and that building permits or licenses are to indicate the location
of the facility at which the said debris is to be disposed. THIS REQUIREMENT DOES NOT
APPLY TO NEW CONSTRUCTION.
In order to simplify the process and to provide uniformity, we arc attaching a copy of a form which you
can either reproduce and use as it is since the completed form will be attached to the office copy of building
permits or licenses; or reproduce it on your letterhead.
In case of municipal,commercial, industrial,or multi-unit housing construction, the contractor may not know
the dumpster subcontractor at the time of the building permit application. In such cases, the attached copy
of an Affidavit can be used.
The complete law is contained in the November issue of CODEWORD which will be mailed to you in the
next two weeks. If you should have any question, please let us know.
CJD1km
, Up of 6atem, Nasnrbugettg
Public Propertp Department
g �3uilbing Mepartment
One 6atem Oreen
745-9595 (Ext. 3S0
William H. Munroe
Director of Public Property
Inspector of Buildings
Zoning Enforcement Officer
in accordance with the provisions of MGL c 40. S 54, a condition of Building Permit
Number is that the debris resulting from this work shall be
disposed of in a property licensed solid waste disposal facility as defined by MGL c 111, S
150A.
The debris will be disposed of in:
Vivi
(&cation of Facility)
Signature of Permit Applic0l
Date
°No,M Cite of *stem, .41a!5!5gPU$Ctt�
Public Propertp Department
Rt� CEIVED�HINE� �3uilbing DepartmetUTY OI✓ SALEM?,HASS.
One *stem green
745-9595 (Ext. 380
William H. Munroe
Director of Public Property
Inspector of Buildings
Zoning Enforcement Officer
AF=IDA V IT
As a result of the provisions of MGL c 4U, 554, I acknowledge that as a condition of Building Permit
Number all debris resulting from the construction activity governed by this
Building Permit shall be disposed of in a properly licensed solid waste disposal facility, as defined by MGL
c 111. S 150A.
I certify that 1 will notify the Building Official by
(iWo months maximum) of the location of the solid waste disposal facility where the debris resulting from
the said construction activity shall be disposed of, and I shall submit the appropriate form for attachment
to the Building Permit.
/21Ztf
Date i nature of Permit Applicant
(Print or type the following information)
VA V A- C'c 0)'/-�
Nr1C (�o /Cl� l�
Name of Permit Applicant
Firm Name, if any
Address
a20
,Rawl ins-Street
Salem, MA 01970
November 4 , 1986
Building Inspector
City of Salem
One Salem Green
Salem, MA 01970
Dear Sir:
I am writing at this time to request a six-month
extension on the Building Permit issued by the City of Salem
on May 29 , 1986 . This request is occasioned by delays caused
by contractors involved with the foundation and floor of the
garage which have been beyond my control .
I respectfully request this extension and thank you
for your cooperation.
Very truly yeurs,
if�If
Claudia Nicgorski
C:
DA• C:�J
(fi#� of �5ttlrm, � ussac4nse#ts
of �Vpzal
r
Rfc�•m�n`T .
VnLLIAM F. ABBOTT
JOSEPH F. DOYLE
JOHN M.GRAY,SR.
ARTHUR E LABRECQUE
JANE T. LUNDREGAN
DONALD E. FAMES
EMERY P. TANCH
September 16, 1976
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
This is to certify that the attached variance for the construction
of a single family house on an undersize lot at 20 Rawlins Street
is still in effect.
A house of the dimensions given in the variance (50 feet long and
twenty-eight feet in depth) or of smaller dimensions may be
constructed on the lot containing 5,066 square feet.
CHAIRMAN, BOARD OF APP
f
_ Hearing - February 24, 1975
ii��? iC G �PTIY� CZt ��7�41 1ta2 >;F�[iVED
.r
-- ejoar,'`, of carp ral SAA Zlf L D9 f'M ']
WILLIAM F. ASSC;TT DECISION ON PETITION OF ERIC R. BROWN TO CASYq�
JGs:.PM E. ocrc FAMILY DWELLING AT 20 RAWLINS STREET.
JG!o: M, GRAY, SR.
AR?4UR E. LA9RECGUE
DCNALJ KOLSMAN This is an appeal from the decision of the Building Inspector,
WA-;EN 3AUGYN
cIER., p T.NC." who refused to issue a permit for the construction of a single
family dwelling at #20 Rawlins Street, Salem, a residential one
family District.
The Building Inspector cited his reason For the refusal to
issue a permit as follows : "This lot is located in a residential
one family district which requires a minimum lot size of 7,000
square feet. The lot in question contains 5,066 square feet. "
The Building Inspector advised the Petitioner of his right
to appeal to the Board of Appeals.
The hearing was held on this appeal. on February 24, 1975
pursuant to notices mailed post-paid to the Petitioner, Board
Members , abutters and abutters to abutters and others , and adver-
tisements duly published in the Salem Evening News advising of
this public hearing. Present were: Mr. John M. Gray, Sr. , Chairman;
P.oard Members : William Abbott, Donald Eames, and Arthur LaBrecque.
The Petitioner, Eric R. Brown, was represented by Attorney
William Quinn, 15 Derby Square, Salem, Massachusetts , who presented
the following evidence
Petitioner wishes to construct a split level single family
home approximately fifty feet long and twenty-eight feet in depth
situated on Lot A on a plan of land in Salem drawn by Essex Survey
Service , Inc. and dated July 29; 1974. The proposed dwelling will
have a front setback of twenty-three feet, a side setback on the
North side of twelve feet down to ten feet and side setback on
Purchase Street of eighteen feet and a rear setback of twenty-four
feet down to twenty feet. Attorney Quinn stated that in accordance
with the Salem Zoning By-Laws there was insufficient lot area due
to the fact that the Petitioner' s lot contains only 5,066 square
feet , the Building Code requiring 7 ,000 square feet for a residential
single family district. At.orney Quinn further indicated that
there was hardship involved due to the size of the lot.
No one appeared in opposition.
r ,
A
,.;
Titu of `'^cd1E17C�
curb of �Apurul
DECISION - ERIC BROWN, 20 RAWLINS ST. -
WILLIAM F. AEEOTT PAGE 2
JO5F.FH F. DOYLE
JOHM M. GRAY, SR,
ARTHUR E. LABRECQUE !
DONALD KOLEP,'AN The Board, being familiar with the area in question and
V1AkREN BAUGHN
EMERY R. TANCH after discussion and review of the plot plan submitted,. found
that a variance could be granted in accordance with the
Petitioner' s request to erect a single family dwelling without
substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying
or substantially derogating from the intent of the District
and the purposes of the Zoning By-Laws. The Board additionally
found that there was hardship involved due to the size and the
uniqueness of the lot in question.
It was unanimously voted to grant the variance.
GRANTED
SALEM BOARD OF APPEALS
Acting Secretary