Loading...
22 PROCTOR STREET - BUILDING INSPECTION�� . �- i 22 PROCTOR STREET_ s�Pef Fim�; ` r CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSET'T'S BUILDING DEPARTMENT la ,� << ^ \�s`=-... .� 120 WASHINGTON STREET, 3'm FLOOR \uase�' TEL: 978-745-9595 KINMERLEY DRISCOLL FAx: 978-740-9846 MAYOR THOMAS ST.PIERRE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROPERTIES/BUILDING COMMISSIONER REQUIRED INSPECTION NOTICE 22 PROCTOR STREET January 29,2014 Jason Mcisaac 22 Proctor Street Salem, Massachusetts 01970 Mr. Mcisaac, The above referenced property has come to the attention of this department for the following reason(s): A report has been made to this office that an apartment unit located in the basement of your property of 22 Proctor Street, contains no secondary means of egress as required by the Massachusetts State Building.. For this reason an inspection must be conducted by our office to assure compliance with the code and city ordinance. Under the provisions of 780 CMR, Section 104.6—Right of Entry, of the State Building Code, access to this property must be granted for the purposes of this inspection. Please call this office upon receipt of this letter, if this property has rental units these tenants must be notified in advance of this inspection so that access to these spaces may also be accomplished. This Required Inspection shall be conducted by this office on Thursday, February 6, 2014 at 10:00 a.m.; failure to respond to this notification will be construed as non- compliance,with issuance of Municipal tickets and as such an Administrative Search Warrant will be sought, so as to allow the lawful inspection of this property. If you feel aggrieved by the Building Codes issues you have the right to appeal this order to the State Board of Building Regulations at One Ashburton Place,Boston, Massachusetts. If you have any further questions regarding this letter,please call this office at(978) 619-5648. Michael E. Lutrzykowski Assistant Building Inspector cc: file, Fire Prevention, CITY OF SALEMv MASSACHUS�€TTS • Ci I r Ur '-ALEM,,tlA BOARD OF APPEAL CLERK'S OFFICE t20 WASHINGTON STREET, 3RD FLOOR SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELEPHONE: 976-74"396 2086 MAR 30' P 3 34 FAX: 978-740-9846 DECISION OF THE PETITION OF JOSEPH O'NEIL REQUESTING A VARIANCE AND SPECIAL PERMIT FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 22 PROCTOR STREET R-2 A hearing on this petition was held on March 15, 2006 with the following Board Members present: Richard Dionne, Edward Moriarty Nicholas Helides and Robin Stein. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioner is requesting a Special Permit to alter a non-conforming structure and Variances from rear and side setback to enclose existing porch for the property located at 22 Proctor Street located in an R-2 zone. The provisions the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to the request for a Special Permit is section 5-3 Q), which provides as follows: Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set forth in Sections 8-6 and 9-4, grant Special Permits. for alterations and reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and for changes, enlargement, extent expansion of nonconforming lots, land, structures, and uses, provided, however, that such change extension, enlargement or expansion shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming use to the neighborhood. In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit requests may be granted upon a finding by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants. The Variances which have been requested may be granted upon a finding of the Board that: A. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, Building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings or structures in the same district. B. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner. C. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the of the Ordinance yL EM..�1A CL�R ('S OFf,1C_ DECISION OF THE PETITION OF JOSPEH O'NEIL REQUESTING A VARIANCE AND SPECIAL PERMIT FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 22 PROCTOR STREET R-2 1006_ page two MAR;30 p 3-.:�U The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented, and after reviewing the plans makes the following findings of fact: 1. The Petitioner owns the property located at 22 Proctor Street, which is located in an R-2 zone. 2. Petitioner seeks relief from rear yard setback to enclose existing porch. 3. Plans were submitted to the Board. 4. Councillor O'Leary presented a letter in support in favor of the petition. 5. There was no opposition to the proposed plans. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the hearings the Zoning Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1. Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property but not the district in general. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Ordinance would involve substantial hardship on the petitioner. 3. The relief requested can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the ordinance 4. The Special Permit granted can be granted in harmony with the neighborhood and will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the city's inhabitants. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted, 5 in favor and 0 in opposition to grant the relief requested, subject to the following conditions; 1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, ordinances, codes and regulations 2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted and approved by the Building Inspector. 3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety shall be strictly adhered to. 4. Petitioner shall obtain a building permit prior to beginning any construction. 5. Exterior finishes of the construction shall be in harmony with the existing structure DECISION OF THE PETITION OF JOSEPH O'NEIL REQUESTING A SPECIAL PERMIT AND VARIANCE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 22 PROCTOR STREET R-2 page three 6. Petitioner shall obtain a Certificate of Inspection. 7. Unless this decision expressly provides otherwise, any zoning relief granted does not authorize Petitioner to demolish or deconstruct any structure(s) on the property to an extent greater than 50% of the structure as measured by floor area or replacement cost. If a structure on the property is demolished by any means to an extent of more than 50% of its replacement cost or more than 50% of its floor area at the time of destruction, it shall not be reconstructed except in conformity with this Ordinance. 8. Petitioner is to seek approval from any City Board or Commission having jurisdiction, but not limited to the Planning Board. Special Permit & Variance Granted March 15, 2006 Richard Dionne Board of Appeal A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11, the Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. o n- r-j a r1l _. Board of Appeal OD o rr O n -Z w M. M-� Li D r Plans must be filed and approved by the Inspector before a permit will be granted. No. _V-55y City of Salem Ward IS PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE c` HISTORIC DISTRICT? Yes No w x IF SIDING, HAS ELECTRICAL ��'4cc ,a'f9 S /l` PERMIT BEEN OBTAINED? Yes—No Home Phone # �f S d APPLICATION Bus. Phone # FOR PERMIT TO ROOF, ERGO OR INSTALL SIDING Salem, Mass., TO THE INSPECTOR OF BUILDINGS: The undersigned herebv applies for a permit to build��cording to the following specifications: Owner's name and address __ y 305 X11 p 2 2 p2ao��rs 57 l)C;ri5 Architect's name Mechanic's name and address ° SAME_ Location of building,No. Z 5911-m M431 What is the purpose of building? Material of building? IVw0 Asbestos? If a dwelling,for how many families'. _ F�M'"�-/ Will the building conform to the re irements of the law? Estimated cost Contras LicLic.No. Signature of applicant 41 REMARKS SIGNED UNDER THE PENALTY OF PERJURY. No. Ward_ APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO ROOF REROOF OR INSTALL SIDING Locatio,�o 0 c PERMIT GRANTED 9-3 Approve Building ctor J+ w .� :Y- r FIELD COPY ~ CITY OF SALEM BUILDING ?° SALEM. MASSACHUSETTS 01970 PERMIT ,A VALID.TION V 4coon DATE Anti 1 6, 19 9_ PERMIT NO.92-93 APPLICANT ,Tnaanh (NNoii ADDRESS ,Sa1PmIIMA Cowmer _ IXO.1- ISTR[ETI IC 0X1 P•S ll(F xf(I PERMIT TOii pitOtIMPR ort M[«.1 _«o. ll NUMBER OF STORY �orosto usEl DWELLING UNITS R'mT+'.F. AT ILOCAI IONI 22 DmIctor St-rect �T a n DIST NG R-� 1x0.1 Isn[RI - BETWEEN AND ICPOSa SINEETI ICRDSS STREETI LOT SUBDIVISION LOT BLOCK SIZE BUILDING IS.TO BE FT. WIDE Br FT. LONG BY FT. IN HEIGHT AND SMALL CONFORM IN CONSTRUCTION TO TYPE USE GROUP "BASEMENT WALLS OR FOUNDATION (TrPE) REMARKS: STRIP & RFIMF AREA OR - 1,500.00 PERMIT 20.00 '0LUME ESTIMATED COST S FEE S r:ela touLR[ F[ni ,WNER Joseph O'Neil A-OAESS 22 Proctor St., Salem,MA Leo E. Tremblay INSPECTOR OF BUILDINGS INSPECTION RECORD: DATE NOTE PROGRESS - CRITICISMS .No REMARKS INSPECTOR eftp of 6a[em, ft1ag!9aCbUM;ett2; J)ublic Propertp Mepartment Nuilbing Mepartment One 6alem Orem 745-0505 ext. 380 William H. Munroe Director of Public Property Inspector of Buildings Zoning Enforcement Officer April 12, 1990 Joseph M O'Neil 22 Proctor Street Salem, MA 01970 RE: �22'Proctor�S[._(Bu_ ildjng Permit) Dear Mr. O'Neil, This office has tried to contact you a number of times without success, on the matter of your building application, and with no response from you. Therefore I am returning your application for a building permit and will hold your twenty dollars ($20.00) as we can not mail cash. You may pick up your money at this office. If I can be of any further assistance, please contact me at this office. Sincerely, �J JamestGaJ James D. Santo Assistant Building Inspector JDS/eaf enc: ( 1) c.c. City Solicitor Ward Councillor Citp of harem, Bam5acbuoetto 3public Propertp Mepartment a Nuilbing Mepartment One *stem Oreen 745-9595 GCxt. 380 William H. Munroe Director of Public Property Inspector of Buildings Zoning Enforcement Officer September 8, 1989 Mr. Joseph M. O'Neill AC22-ProfEor Street �� Salem,,—MA:01970 RE: Permit for 22 Proctor Street Dear Mr. O'Neill: We have been unable to process your permit application for the above referenced address. The cost of the permit fee is $89.00, from you we have received $20.00, therefore an additional $69.00 is necessary. We estimate the job at $45.00 per square foot a total estimate of $14,000. If you have any questions, please contact me at this office. Sincerely, /Unfl James D. Santo w Assistant uilding Inspector Received by:au� Delivered in hand by: c.c. Leonard F. O'Leary / City Solicitor Date: City Clerk P 038 763 481 RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL (See Reverse) Sent to Mr. Joseph O'Neill Street and No. 22 Proctor St. P.O.,State and ZIP Code Salem, MA. 01970 y Postage 5 2.00 Certified Fee t Special Delivery Fee Restricted Delivery Fee Return Receipt showing to whom and Date Delivered N a Return Receipt showing to whom. Date.and Address of Delivery v TOTAL Postage and Fees S 2.00 Postmark or Date E 0 UL STICK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVEN FIRST CLASS POSTAGE, CERTIFIED MAIL FEE,AND CHANGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES.(see front) 1. If you want this receipt postmarked,stick the gummed stub to the right of the return address leaving the receipt attached and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge) 2. If you do not want this receipt postmarked,stick the gummed stub to the right of the return address of the article,date,detach and retain the receipt,and mail the article. 3. If you want a return receipt, write the certified mail number and your name and address on a return receipt card,Farm 3811,and attach it to the front of the article by means of the gummed ends if space per- mits. Otherwise, affix to back of article. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED adjacent to the number. 4. It you want delivery restricted to the addressee,or to an authorized agent of the addressee,endorse RESTRICTED DELIVERY on the front of the article. R� 5. Enter fees for the services requested in the appropriate spaces on the front of this receipt. If return receipt is requested check the applicable blocks in item 1 of Form 3811. 6. Save this receipt and present it if you make inquiry. n U.S.G.P.O.1988-217 1 32 o Cftp of balem, Aaggacbuoettg iublic J)ropertp department Nuilbing Mepartment One 6alem green 745-9595 ext. 380 William H. Munroe Director of Public Property Inspector of Buildings Zoning Enforcement Officer September 8, 1989 Mr. Joseph M. O'Neill 22 Proctor Street Salem, MA. 01970 RE: Permit for 22 Proctor Street`- • Dear Mr. O'Neill: We have been unable to process your permit application for the above referenced address. The cost of the permit fee is $89.00, from you we have received $20.00, therefore an additional $69.00 is necessary. We estimate the job at $45.00 per square foot a total estimate of $14,000. If you have any questions, please contact me at this office. Sincerely, James D. Santo Assistant Building Inspector c.c. Leonard F. O'Leary City Solicitor o� Citp of *alemt ,$1aggaCbU5ett!5 ra Vubk Property Mepartment q��Y,ry�ryg jguilbing 39epartment One 0alem green 745-9595 Cxt. 380 William H. Munroe Director of Public Property Inspector of Buildings Zoning Enforcement Officer September 8, 1989 Mr. Joseph M. O'Neill 22 Proctor Street Salem, MA. 01970 RE: Permit for 22 Proctor Street Dear Mr. O'Neill: We have been unable to process your permit application for the above referenced address. The cost of the permit fee is $89.00, from you we have received $20.00, therefore an additional $69.00 is necessary. We estimate the job at $45.00 per square foot a total estimate of $14,000. If you have any questions, please contact me at this office. Sincerely, James D. Santo Assistant Building Inspector Received by: Delivered in hand by: c.c. Leonard F. O'Leary City Solicitor Date: 1 9747 CITY OF SALEM - BUILDING DEPARTMENT z �i CITY HALL ANNEX p U.S.PUJlluir, ONE SALEM GREEN - r , SEP-8'89 r - �EM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 + ' P 038 763 481 ' t` L Claim Chock - Ai A No. µETURn�� f ❑Hold t f- TC SENGte� 0 d i RAsm ,:1ccuE0 Rer a Mr, Joseph O'Neill 15— �((q �a�fi iQ urrknewn 11/ InSu(ficipnt Aa9;255 22 Proctor St. l No such stTW—number S31eIRr MA, 2ND Notice Na Such 0ilice in state 01970 Do not remail in this enrelDpe Return ;SEP 418?8;' An.4888 f fiirrrrrrlif�;�;.�t,��;i#� -11„�Jtl�r9r��,a�r;�1 ;;111�rr1,�F�ll • SENDER: Complete items 1 and 2 when additional services are desired, and complete items 3 and 4. Put your address in the "RETURN TO" Space on the reverse side. Failure to do this will prevent this card from being returned to you.The return recei t fee will Provide You the name of the person delivered to and the date of delfver .Fora itiona ees t e o owing services ere uyunable.Uonsurt postmaster ' Tor Inand c ec c ox es for additional service(s) requested. how to whom delivered, date, and addressee's address. 2. ❑ Restricted Delivery m (Farre charge) (Extra charge) Wm 3. Article Addressed to: 4. Article Number o m Mr. Joseph O'Neill 1 -4 Q 22 Proctor St. ape of Service: LJ Registered ❑ Insured x z L Salem, MA. 01970 )ERCertiffed ❑ COD m< ❑ Express Mail ❑ Return Receipt m c WO for Merchandise G cc v Always obtain signature of addressee N « or agent and DATE DELIVERED. 2 c5. Signature — Address B. Addressee's Address (ONLY of m G X requested and fee paid) m 8. Signature —Agent X 7. Date of Delivery PS Form 3811, Mar. 1988 * U.S.G.P.O. 1988-212-885 DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT a of *'em, Aussuchuse##sNOV 15r 3 of `ri 8d Poara of c1 Vpral FiLFr DECISION ON THE,PETITION_OF JOSEPH O'NEILL FOR A CITY CL; .; VARIANCE AT 22 PROCTOR STREET (R.'-2) A hearing on this petition was held October 26, 1988 with the following Board Members present: James Fleming, Chairman; Messrs. , Bencal, Luzinski, Nutting and Associate Member LaBrecque. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioner, owner of the property, is requesting a Variance from side setback requirements to allow construction of an addition in the rear of the property which is located in an R-2 district. The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding of the Board that: a. special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings and structures in the same district; b. literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner; c. desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1 . Ward Councillor spoke in favor as did three abutters; 2. No one appeared in opposition; 3. Addition of a bedroom is needed due to growing family; 4. Because of the location of ledge on the property, locating the addition elsewhere would not be feasible. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1 . Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property but not the district generally; 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Ordinance would involve a substantial hardship to the petitioner; 3. The relief requested can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district of the purpose of the Ordinance. c DECISION ON THE PETITION OF JOSEPH O'NEILL FOR A VARIANCE AT 22 PROCTOR STREET, SALEM page two Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the relief requested, subject to the following conditions: 1 . All construction be as per plans submitted to the Board; 2. Exterior finish be in harmony with the neighborhood; 3. All construction conform with state and local codes; 4. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department be adhered to; 5. A Building Permit and a Certificate of Occupancy be obtained. VARIANCE GRANTED / / .�IYC John R. Nutting, Se A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK , PURSUANT TO SECTION 17 OF TFE Y:— P l7iTH Rd 2^u THE DAYS AFTER THE DATE Ct FIL Gii; G"i JE ;;F Thr CITY CLEn"6. L� C. I''.PTLR FOe. SECTION 11. THE VARIAC;F OR -CT U%TL A COPY OF TFE^^ !1� g.{Fi Tij- E � 1. 1 NO C.7EAL HAS O- Fq.EU. n'PEr.L n S �:L'i FIDE THAI IT HAS SEEN DISaISSED OR Or LIED IS RECD.CR i- THE S'.J71H ESSEX REC!STRi OF DEEDS AND INOEXED UIIDEi: THE NA'L: OF THE 06VidER OF RECORD OR IS RECORDED AND NOTED ON THE OWNER'S CERTIFICATE OF TITLE. BOARD OF APPEAL APPLICANT COPY zD THIS PERMIT NOT VALID UNLESS CITY OF SALEM BUILDING Ea PROPERLY RECEIPTED BY CASHIER SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 019.70 PERMIT < �� VALIDATION R!'CQ'm!C x DATE May 4, 19 PERMIT rocNO. APPLICANT Nicholas Milona ADDRESS e Vcor St, gwaer ..L.1 (N0.) (STREET) (CONTR'SLICENSE) nn OF PERMIT TO R= Aenovatr_) STORY NUMBBERING UNITS- (TYPE (TYPE OF IMPROVEMENT) NO. (PROPOSED USED 22 Proctor Street ZONING AT (LOCATION). DISTRICT (NO.) (STREET) BETWEEN AND (CROSS STREET) (CROSS STREET) LOT SUSO IV IS I ON LOT BLOCK S1ZE BUILDING IS TO BE FT. WIOE BY FT. LONG BY FT. IN HEIGHT AND SHALL CONFORM IN CONSTRUCTION TO TYPE USE GROUP BASEMENT WALLS OR FOUNDATION (TYPE) REMARKS: Sheetrock two rooms,add bathroom AREA ORP VOLUME ESTIMATED COST a 6,000• FEEMIT S 23.00 !CUBIC/SQUARE FEET; OWNER Nicholas Milona -- —ADDRESS Z2 BUILDING OEPT., ^ 1:'YbCf.0Y Street BY Y %r4yf� ,cK�t+wL YOUR SPECIAL ATTENTION is galled to th,; following: This permit is granted on the express conditiohthat the said construction shall, in all respects,conform to the Ordinances of this jurisdiction including the Zoning Ordinance,regulating the construction and use of buildings, and may be revoked at any time upon violation of any provisions of said ordinances. lkeatherproof placard given A the time permit is issued must, be displayed un premises. The department must bo notified and inspection made of prior c on.stru,tion ocork ws requested on weather card. All new buildings and additions and alterations to existing buildings require a minimum of three call inspections, namely, (1) Footings, drain the systems, foundation and basement walls, when walls are at hast two feet high, but before backfilling the wall and before proceeding with the superstructures. (2) Framing prior to lathing and plastering, duct work, fire .stopping and other equipment before it is concealed. (7) Fina inspection when building or structure is com- pleted. On jobs involving reinforced concrete work, inspection must be made after steel is in place and before concrete is poured. r The Department reserves the right to reject any work which has been concealed or completed without first having been inspeote-1 mid approved by Out Department in no(ordance with the requirements of the various codes. Any deviation from tfic approved plana must he authorized by the approval of revised plans subject to the same procedure established for the examination of the original plans. An additional permit fee is also charged predicated on the extent of the variation from the original plans Permits me not valid if construction work is not started within six months from date permit is issued. Request for Final Inspection should be made by postcard or phone call to this department when the construction work is completed and heating apparatus has been installed. Panting or decoratingis not required before the Final Building Inspection. Final Inspection and certiticat.e of occupancy must be obtained before cocupying building.