6-8 PROCTOR STREET - BUILDING INSPECTIONI6-8. PROCTOR STREET -
* 1
� K°'TAS CIS of SALEM,
,
BOARD OF APPEAL
120\GASHINGIONSrRi,aF.r41S,va>ni,\LAssarriuscris01970
'fei.[t:973-619-5685 Fnc 978-740A404
Kiwl R[.uY Diuscoi .
MAYOR
n
August 28, 2012 <
r ¢,
rn
Decision x„ s
>M co m pp
m
*
City of Salem Zoning Board of Appeals >
a ,P
Petition of 8 PROCTOR ST LLP requesting Variances from lot width/frontage, sidgsetbmks
and front setbacks, and a Special Permit to extend a nonconforming structure and a .J
nonconforming use, in order to construct a 2nd story addition on the property located at 8
PROCTOR STREET(113 Zoning District).
A public hearing on the above Petition was opened on August 15, 2012 pursuant to Mass
General Law Ch. 40A, § 11. The hearing was closed on August 15, 2012 with the following
Zoning Board of Appeals members present: Rebecca Curran (Chair), Michael Duffy,Jamie
Metsch, and Bonnie Belair.
t
Petitioner seeks Variances pursuant to Section 4.0 and Special Permits under Sections 3.3.2 and
3.3.3 of the City of Salem Zoning Ordinances.
Statements of fact:
1. In a petition date-stamped August 1, 2012, petitioner requested a Variance and Special
Permits to construct a 30'x18'x12', 2nd story addition on the existing commercial
building located at 8 Proctor Street.
2. Petitioner Christopher Monaco (8 Proctor Street LLP) represented himself at the
hearing.
3. At the hearing, petitioner stated that there would be no increase in employees or
parking needs associated with the project.
4. At the hearing, no one spoke in favor of or in opposition to the project.
I
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the public
hearing, and after thorough review of the plans and petition submitted, makes the following
findings:
1. Desirable relief may be granted without detriment to the public good and without
nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent or purpose of the zoning ordinance,
since the extension of the currently nonconforming use is in keeping with the
neighborhood, which contains numerous other pre-existing, nonconforming industrial uses;
the proposal would not increase traffic or parking needs on the site; the project would
improve the property; the expansion would be only upwards within the existing footprint;
and the tallest portion of the building would be on the interior of the site.
2. Special conditions and circumstances exist affecting the parcel or building, which do not
generally affect other land or buildings in the same district; owing to the odd shape of the
lot, areas for expansion are limited. Therefore, literal enforcement of the provisions of this
ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the appellant.
3. In permitting such change, the Board of Appeals requires certain appropriate conditions
and safeguards as noted below.
On the basis of the above findings of fact and all evidence presented at the public hearing
including, but not limited to, the Plans, Documents and testimony, the Zoning Board of Appeals
voted four (4) in favor (Curran, Metsch, Belair, and Duffy) and none (0) opposed, to grant the
requested Variance and Special Permits. A Variance under Section 4.0 and Special Permits
under Sections 3.3.2 and 3.3.3 are granted to allow for the proposed addition as shown on the
submitted plans and elevation drawings.
The Board of Appeals voted to grant petitioner's request for a Special Permit subject to the
following terms, conditions, and safeguards:
1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, ordinances, codes and
regulations.
2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted to and
approved by the Building Commissioner.
3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety
shall be strictly adhered to.
4. Petitioner shall obtain a building permit prior to beginning any construction.
5. A Certificate of Occupancy is to be obtained.
2
6. Petitioner is to obtain approval from any City Board or Commission having
jurisdiction including, but not limited to, the Planning Board.
7. Unless this Decision expressly provides otherwise, any zoning relief granted doe
not empower or authorize the Petitioner to demolish or reconstruct the
structure(s) located on the subject property to an extent of more than fifty
percent (50%) of its floor area of more than fifty percent (50%) of its
replacement cost at the time of destruction. If the structure is demolished by
any means to an extent of more than fifty percent (50%) of its replacement cost
or more than fifty percent (50%) of its floor area at the time of destruction, it
shall not be reconstructed except in conformity with the provisions of the
Ordinance.
Michael Duffy, Member
Salem Board of Appeals
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Massachusetts
General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days of filing of this decision in the office
of the City Clerk. Pursuant to the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11, the
Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision
bearing the certificate of the City Clerk has been filed with the Essex South Registry of Deeds.
3
o CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS
- BOARD OF APPEAL
124 WASHINGTON STREET, 3RD FLOOR
SALEM, MA O 1970 o c7
TEL. (978) 745-9595 ^'
FAX (978) 744.9846 O rn
STANLEY J. USOVICZ, JR.
MAYOR LIJ
C)Vim
tt,,
YTim
-n:r
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF JOHN DIONNE REQUESTING A SPECIAL PERM' rn�
FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8 PROCTOR STREET R-2 t >
A hearing on this petition was held on October 16, 2002 with the following Board
Members present: Nina Cohen, Nicholas Halides, Stephen Harris, Joseph Barbeau and
Joan Boudreau. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and Others and notices of the
hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with
Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioner requests a Special Permit for the operation of woodworking shop and other
constructed related light industrial use for the property located at 8 Proctor Street located
in a R-2 zone.
The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this request for a
Special Permit is section 5-3 (2) (8), which provides as follows:
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the Board of
Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set forth in Section 8-6
and 9-4, grant Special Permits for alterations and reconstruction of nonconforming
structures, and for changes, enlargement, extension of expansion, of nonconforming
lots, land, structures, and uses, provided however, that such change, extension,
enlargement of expansion shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing
nonconforming use to the neighborhood.
In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit requests, guided by
the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted upon a finding by the Board that
the grant of the Special Permit will promote the public health, safety, convenience and
welfare of the City's inhabitants.
A. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building
or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings or
stuctures in the same district.
B. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve
Substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner.
C. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and
Without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the
purpose of the ordinance.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented, and
after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact:
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF JOHN DIONNE REQUESTING A SPECIAL PERMIT
FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8 PROCTOR STREET R-2
page two
1. The Petitioner's will make significant improvements to this otherwise vacant and
rundown property, which will be to the benefit of all.
2. The nature of this operation will be to create woodworking pieces specifically for
construction projects, and not for retail sale; there will be no showroom or
displays.
3. The hours of operation for this business will be Monday through Friday from 7:30
a.m. until 5:00 p.m. and on Saturdays from 8:00 until noon.
4. There exists a lot that provides sufficient parking to support this business.
S. Any signage for this business will be reviewed and approved where applicable by
the Sign Review Board.
8. Councillor Kevin Harvey spoke in favor to this request.
7. There was no opposition to this petition.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the hearing,
the Board of Appeal concludes as follows;
1. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the ordinance would involve substantial
hardship on the petitioner.
2. The relief requested can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good
and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the
purpose of the ordinance.
3. The Special Permit granted can be granted in harmony with the neighborhood and
will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's
inhabitants.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted 5 in favor and 0 in opposition, to grant the
relief requested, subject to the following conditions:
1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statues, codes ordinances and
regulations.
2. A Certificate of Occupancy shall be obtained.
3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety shall
be strictly adhered to.
4. A Certificate of Inspection shall be obtained.
4
s
DECISION OF THE PETITION OF JOHN DIONNE REQUESTING A SPECIAL PERMIT
FOR THE PROPERT LOCATED AT 8 PROCTOR STREET R-2
page three
5. Petitioner is to obtain approval from any City Board of Commission having
jurisdiction including, but not limited to, the Planning Board.
SPECIAL PERMIT GRANTED
October 18, 2002
septi Barb au Ls�
Board of Appeals
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND
THE CITY CLERK
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17, of MGL Chapter
40A, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office
of the City Clerk. Pursuant to MGL Chapter 40A, Section 11, the Variance or Special
Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision, bearing the
certification of the City Clerk that the 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been
filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that is has been dismissed or denied is
recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the
owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title.
THE FOLLOWING
IS/ARE THE BEST
IMAGES FROM POOR
QUALITY ORIGINALS)
IM /A-�C&L
DATA
l '
i
yMMA a
411
(107. 45) feet; Westerly by land of said Mary J Cunney twenty one (21)
feet; Northerly forty seven and 55/100 (47.55) Net, northwesterly sixteen
and 2/10 (16.2) feet, northwesterly but more westerly twenty six and 15/100 ;
f ` a
a Y.hi res y x, arses be- (4j"
s" v ..p of Iand
a- a
r
"ct _ e - t� a. a 3'4 ao .:w 'r'`.m ", • ror1'� �r,, ! i ' et more or
.t
t
and with
�.
Ad rt y �Pd r f d� i ery 1 fd c F.• ) feet deep44
I.
g'
and of L7ary s
§ u # 3 �` ,x}'` ¥�r n,8"w K'r• ��3iz � 1" ,, x e said
w ° 4fi 7 r
ti 44ea
� ,.; a `
` a y R 4Y�t a to yi u
fi ,, �: ► to ,. ns, screen
e
e at pres-
prior to s
oreclosure s¢
ointed the t
-. P .., a }T cqT ., ,. i �' � a y•,-^k fjtz' + .. - Ti
the Insur-
Lia ge. I
8 74t}1 S@r-
ce of the k qg
�T �
said sum
gy ar 8yy4 t 6 ! e. The
yt Pte/. t 1' ♦� yLA T }µ? ' ;'
' 'Mg-2, t m•'� it '. "
. 3�. ..� event of
of the t ,
ortgage
x-
y breach
r�� "Y
{ Power of N
x : �. ;4�4i _ ~
':.e a •.'t .r y :.; dpi, ' ,5 `� �"$ ' :tF " -', , ' �`,_' r 1924. , 4i
seal
t a• �Fn _ :k Yty 67`,T i ..� .?�w +hX '7au -n
FA's n k �' "4 � +#v
amed T a,r-
er free 4
d Examined.
---------- '.
i
r,s E
Alt
f Massa- Evelyn
Kk
, ; .for consideration ti
''��. 'an e Paid, to ,
ouzanis of said Ipswich with V7
p A1�RAIITY, COVFddNTS one undivid- Bouzanis 1
;ham ed half part of a certain parcel of land with the buildings thereon situ- ' {
i
IIP peoPoSCD i M.H.
ti
113• � � _ , - i 22 II_t
l
2A
�Ev6
, � ,'-�l i�f GANAGAN
11,0
1D
t 3 3t.
ti
�j�• —�� I I A �
�� � k- c+✓2 Fi,54.5' _ I �� j it ,��li�n
/\
PAZ,-rr . 475 14,9G
\ a,• 1 � [./NIT I SEL°Ni,FL. �G
/ I p�:7iED .> RiDGf 7J.25' I A(,
14
Q f12:T FL
OJ pp�`lP4�t
i
/g
10
i I 9
�NSo
/ /o
/2
l
14
+ � So•55 ) ;� 3
AKI 5A
k
DWELLING
I
TAeIt 6ALcallll (23) la DWELLING `j'
2EnU%eE� Tsln,Q3
AIeEA .2S�i00� �SS3G�D b� Il � I I
3 Soo
,4or wa-7,w Ioo' /oo'f - � U
bt- :S° D n { rC: P
covr,eA
/d. / �o l Au ✓EA/C5 Ar
f"CrAIr yA� /$ ' 37�4G' -
5/L< .zo '
c T F,et are>?ANr: S°'r — oA, 517-E PLA N
- pOi°OS/rte _�...� OF 51�EfT.
yE/�ifir 4 s 2 2, 7r /1/1 UL T/-FAM/L Ol/VEZ L /A/G
No Dt 5ro,eIE5 3% E � poLe
PICOC-7 571"AfET — .5�L E/VI 3 Mol 5 S,
Bt-;wa N TO 81 USED
UtLD/NG f qO! / wIL�/ / THIS ONSTRU TIONORTORORDERING SCALE: /'�� QQ
.a ,V LI � / — MATERIAL
CONSTRUCTION R FOR ORDERING
MAtERIAI UNLESS DATED AND SIGNED APPROVALS
CERTIFIED DR. RM. ENG'R
DATE
ISSUE
DWG. . NO. //84 - 5.3 - 00/
P
FORM ceuoIooN a�,. Ioleo DRAWN BY=/YJ=4--
DESIGNED BY
f l,Jit
• r r 7
SALEM Q Sutueeoa fo Surtndlti S ��/ ROLLS
ELEQRDNICS 71'7 LTD.
Divlslon of ¢)�yl Suuessor fo
��LM. 8 Procter Street, Salem, MA 01970 (617)745-3333
�E,
��iriY;QF Stilt,
November 15 , 1983
Richard T. McIntosh
One Salem Green
Inspector of Buildings
Salem , MA 01970
Dear Mr. McIntosh:
Thank you for your letter of November 10 . As requested ,
please find enclosed a copy of the right-of-way plans for 8
Proctor St .
Very truly yours,
JohnksiMnt
tte
Vice
JJS/cek
enclosure
BATTERY CHARGERS • BATTERY TESTERS • GOLF CART AUTOMATIC ELECTRONIC CHARGERS • MARINE CHARGERS
ENGINE STANDBY CHARGERS • DIGITAL BATTERY VOLT-TESTERS 0 ELECTRODYNE TRUCK-MARINE H.D. ALTERNATORS
SALEM Q Sucuaao-z to ave S �/� ROLLS .
ELECTRONICS se �r 1 LTD.
Division of - Successor to .
ROLLS gyro. 8 Procter Street, Salem, MA 01970 (617)745-3333 Ist' o t
W .
?REN
December 27 , 1983 CITY DF 54LEtx,hf $ ,
Salem Building Dept .
City Hall Annex
One Salem Green
Salem, MA 01970
Attention Richard T. McIntosh , Building Inspector
Dear Mr. McIntosh:
Confirming my telephone conversation with reference to the
continuing complaint about the rooming house occupancy of
the dwelling at 6 Proctor Street . I previously forwarded a
photostat showing that the previous owner of the Surrette
property at 8 Proctor St. granted 60 ' right-of-way from
Proctor St . plot shows driveway rights.
There is just no way that 4-6 cars , plus a very active
visitor traffic that ignores all posted property signs , can
park without parking where they please. They have ignored
your warnings of illegal use of the property , and my
continued warnings to them that they are violating private
property rights . In fairness I might say not all , but a
few. After repeated warnings to the owner of the car in the
enclosed photo , he will keep his car out for a few days ,
then start parking so that trucks cannot get in. This photo
was taken on Saturday , the 24th.
I made him remove the car , but he later parked half on the
right-of-way . I have tried to cooperate, but they do as
they please , never asking for permission. One of the
tenants complained that his car had been pilfered at night
because of the driveway building light being out . I had it
repaired and have been leaving it on at night at a cost of
approximately $6. 00 a month, plus the cost of the repair .
What happens? Their visitors traffic now consider this a
lighted public parking lot .
This is posted private property. The situation that I ' m
complaining about cannot be corrected as long as this
property is allowed to be used as a rooming house with no
place for parking except on our property .
BATTERY CHARGERS • BATTERY TESTERS • GOLF CART AUTOMATIC ELECTRONIC CHARGERS • MARINECHARGERS
ENGINE STANDBY CHARGERS • DIGITAL BATTERY VOLT-TESTERS • ELECTRODYNE TRUCK-MARINE H.D.ALTERNATORS
z
This is such a clear case of invasion of private property
that it should not be necessary for me to go to the expense
of court action. The fire dept . has been inspecting all
apartments , rooming houses, etc . It is mandatory that the
owners apply for a permit and inspection for compliance. I
assumme noncompliance would be reported to your office . It
is my wish to go through the proper enforcement channels
that exist , and I would assume the Capt . Gorgin would be
interested in this complaint.
This letter is not intended to report every little detail ,
but as a follow-up on a very annoying situation. This kind
of occupancy does not pay its way . We pay approximately
$1 , 800. a year in taxes , and pay for private disposal
service. We only have three people using these facilities
(8 Proctor St . ) at this time.
Very tr ours,
John Surrette
Vic esident
JJS/cek
enclosure
cc/ Fran Grace , Councilor at Large
4p nOi ql
1.1tiblic Valpertg Department
s' �� iiilliit�
Department
�CININ opr
r
Richard T. McIntosh
One Salem Green November 10,1983
745-0213
John J. Surrette
Rolls Ltd.
8 Proctor Street
Salem,Ma 01970
Dear Mr. Surrette:
Responding to your letter of November 1,1983, please be aware
of the following:
I will continue my efforts to monitor this situation.
I would appreciate the copy of theplan showing the right of way
(it was not enclosed in your letter to me.)
There is no one that has "enough influence at City Hall" ( at least,
not in this Department) that would affect the performance of this
Department in carrying out the duties of this office.
Please keep in contact with me and hopefully we can resolve these
problems.
Very truly yours,
Richard T. McIntosh
Zoning Enforcement Officer
Inspector of Buildings
RTM:mo's
cc: Councillor Grace
AIIL MIN ROLLS
ELECTRO—NI Suuaeoa to Smwaxa SuP0(y
LTD.
01 on of Su<eeaaerio .
ROLLS LTD. B Procter Street, Salem, MA 019701 7),�45 . urret
i
a �� �. e .
Rolls Battery Enginelf'.f
November 1 , 1983
The City of Salem
Public Property Dept ,
One Salem Green
Salem, MA 01970
Attention Richard T. MacIntosh
Dear Mr. MacIntosh:
With reference to your letter of Sept . 1 to Maurice A.
Gauthier. I believe that the landlord has made every effort
to cooperate , and after receipt of the letter , the cars have
at least been partially out of the driveway.
I also believe that the situation of using the property as a
rooming house at 6 Proctor St . , next to our property , is
beyond his (the landlord ' s) control . There is no apparent
parking space at 6 Proctor St. and as a result they park
wherever there is space available .
I am enclosing a copy of the plan showing the right of way
between 6 and 8 Proctor St. 6 Proctor St. just does not
have available space for the parking of all these cars. On
Sunday, October 30 , for example, at 12 : 00 there were seven
cars parked . One across the driveway on Proctor , three cars
in or partially on the right , four of the cars were parked
on the street. There are only two properties , 6 and 8
Proctor , and there was nobody at 8 Proctor . It stands to
reason that all the cars belonged at 6 Proctor .
Since your letter of Sept . 1 , 1 have noticed two additional
cars that I have never seen before at this property. This
indicates that there must be new roomers occupying part of
the property. If this property is allowed to continue being
used as a rooming house the situation will worsen, rather
than improve. I sympathize with the landlord of the
property , Maurice A. Gauthier , however , I feel until
different use of the property is instigated it is going to
be impossible for him to control it .
BATTERY CHARGERS • BATTERY TESTERS • GOLF CART AUTOMATIC ELECTRONIC CHARGERS • MARINE CHARGERS
ENGINE STANDBY CHARGERS DIGITAL BATTERY VOLT-TESTERS 0 ELECTRODYNE TRUCK-MARI NE H.D.ALTERNATORS
2
During the winter we have to plow the yard and the right of
way . If last winter is any indication , it means that after
we clear the cars , when and if we can , they move right back
into the plowed section. They don ' t contribute any effort
in clearing the space. It is my expense to keep this space
clear.
This letter is intended to bring you up to date with the
conditions that still exist.
One of the cars was towed away from the front of the house
at 6 Proctor St. The tenant who owned the car was very
abusive to me even though I had nothing to do with having
the car removed . He indicated that he had enough influence
at City Hall that I was wasting my time making complaints .
I recognize that this comment was made in the heat of anger ,
it also contained a veiled threat , a possibility to make
trouble. I have seniority of the ownership of the
properties by at least 20 years since these people have
arrived . There is no previous record of any complaints.
It is not my intention to move from this property , any new
landlord would be far less tolerant .
Very tr yours ,
Joh Surrette
Vi resident
JJS/cek
cc : Fran Grace , Councillor
•ANDER:Complete items 1,2,3,and 4.
Add your address in the"RETURN TO"space
_ on reverse.
(CONSULT POSTMASTER FOR FEES)
I.The following service is requested(check one).
Show to whom and date delivered.................... —C
❑ Show to whom,date,and address of delivery.. —0
x.❑ RESTRICTED DELIVERY —6
(The restricted delireryfee is charged in addition N
the return receipifee)
TOTAL S i
a.ARTICLE ADDRESSED TO.
z Mr.& Mrs? Maurice Gauthier
m
c 3 Alcann Rd.
z Beverly,Ma 01915
9 e. TYPE OF SERVICE: ARTICLE NUMBER
m ❑REGISTERED ❑INSURED rn p 474 720 649❑CERTIFIED E]COD
r
ElEXPRESS MAIL r
rn (Always obtain signature of addressee or agent)
4 1 have received the article described above.
InSIGNATURE ❑ r ❑ Auth
a orized a ent
m
a S DATE OF DELIVERY !POSTMARK
9
RI
0 6.ADDRESSEE'S ADDRESS(Only i/requerte { I )Ti".
y ,: a
M
7.UNABLE TO DELIVER BECAUSE: h
M y
i
r
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
OFFICIAL BUSINESS
PENALTY FOR PRIVATE
SENDER INSTRUCTIONS USE TO AVOID PAYMENT
OF POSTAGE,$300
Prim your ones, and,Z &ad 4a t eeverse below.
• Carta lew l,;;and/an the reverse. u
•
Attach tok0atall vftIta mpennlls, �
othelNBa a&to beck of aNds
• Endonaareeh-badurn Recalpt Requested"
ed*uItonember.
RETURN
TO
Public Property Department
(Name of Sender)
1 Salem Green
(Street or P.O. Box)
Salem,Ma 01970
(City, State, and ZIP Code)
P 4,74" 720 649
RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL
NO INSURgNCE COVERAGE PROVIDEO—
NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL
y- (See Reverse)
Sent m
Mr. & Mrs. Maurice Gauthier
Street and No.
3 Alcann Road
PA.,State and ZIP Code
Beverl Ma 01915
Postage $
Certified Fee
Special Delivery Fee
Restricted Delivery Fee t
Return Receipt Showing
to whom and Data Delivered
Return Receipt Showinglo whom,
iy Date,and Address of Delivery
as
TOTAL Postage and Fm - $
ti
p. Postmark or Date
ro
Re:. 6 Proctor
E
O
p+ r
rn
p.
STICK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER FIRST CLASS POSTAGE,
CERTIFIED MAR FEE,AND CHANGES FOR AMY SELECTED"OPTIONAL SERVICES.(ees fmiR)
1.Hyouwant thterecelptpostmarked;silcirthegmnmedstubontheteftporton oftheaddresi side
of the article leaving the receipt attached andpresentthe article at a post office seNlce windowor
hand it to your rural carrier.(no extra charge)
2.If Volt do not mm this receipt postmarked;stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the
address bide of The article,date,detach and retain the receipt,and malt iha article.
&If you wanta return receipt,write the certified nail number aril your name and address on a
return receipt card;Foim 3811,and attach-it to thefronfof tbeaMole bV iyieana ofthe gammededds
N space permits.OHTerwise,affix w back of article.Endorse front of article RETURN RECELPT
REQUESTED adjacent to the number.
4.If you want deRvery restricted to The addressee,a to an authorized agent of the addressee,
endorse RESTRICTED DELIVERY on the front of the article.
S.Enter fees for the services requested in the appropriate spaces on the front of this receipt.If
return receipt is requested,check the applicable blocks in hem 1 of Form 3811,:
6.Save'this receipt and present it if you make mqulry.
.� � � � �u�Zlir �rn�Pxf� �P�tzrtxttent
Richard T. McIntosh
One Salem Green September 1, 1983
745-0213.
Maurice A. Gauthier
R-II Zoned
Velore M. Gauthier
3 Alcann Rd. Re: 6 Proctor Street
Beverly,Ma 01915
Dear Mr. & Mrs. Gauthier:
It has come to the attention of this Department that you are
using the above referenced property as a rooming house.
Please be advised that this use is a violation of the City
Zoning Ordinance in an R-I1 Zoned District.
Your tenants are also illegally parking their cars on a right of way.
You are therefore required to cease and desist from all of your
illegal activities at this address immediately.
Failure to comply with any of the above will result in this
matter being persued through the Courts for their determination.
Very truly yours,
(// r
F�
Richard T. McIntosh
Zoning Enforcement Officer
RTM:mo's
cc: Sohn Surrette
Councillor F.Grace
License Board
Police Dept.
Certified Mail # P 474 720 649
r
iv
Suutaw to Suvulla S ��/ELECTRONICS "'ROLLS L D. � p���L7D• 8ProcterStreet, Salem, MA01970 (617)745j�3311 .' '
R�CE7Wz';0
August 15 , 1983 CITY GSS'1LEH,��c5
City of Salem
City Hall
Salem, MA 01970
Attention Richard T. McIntosh
Dear Mr. McIntosh:
Confirming my telephone conversation with you regarding my
complaint of 6 Proctor Street.
Rolls, Ltd . , which is the successor to Surrette Supply Co. ,
has been located at 8 Proctor Street for over twenty ( 20)
years. We have never had any problems with the previous
owners of 6 Proctor Street.
The new owners are apparently using this property as a
rooming house, and there are several cars owned by the
occupants with no parking facilities except leaving their
cars in a right-of-way that was apparently given to them by
6 Proctor Street some years ago by.
We maintain and pay for hot topping and plowing in the
winter time , et cetera . Their leaving their cars in the
right of way deprives us of the use of it, we can not get
our trucks in or out , and have to take deliveries in through
our office , which is terribly inconvenient and time
consuming to our office personnel.
We have repeatedly requested of them to keep their cars out
to no avail . The property as presently used results in it
being a nuisance. They also attract a number of other cars
that add to our problem. Enclosed is a plan on file showing
the registered plot. Our property is posted front and side
indicating no parking . It has now reachred a point where we
are forced to request release from the nuisance of the use
of this property as a rooming house with no parking
facilities. We believe the registered owner to be Gauthier.
Very tr y yours ,
John Surrette
Vic resident JJS/cek
CC Ms. Fran Grace
BATTERY CHARGERS • BATTERY TESTERS • GOLF CART AUTOMATIC ELECTRONIC CHARGERS • MARINE CHARGERS
ENGINE STANDBY CHARGERS • DIGITAL BATTERY VOLT-TESTERS • ELECTRODYNE TRUCK-MARINE H.D. ALTERNATORS
RAO � •
SALEM o SIlCCmm f0 save6 S ,�/� ROLLS .
ELECTRONICS �Y"I LTD.
Division of SucceuIt +o .
Rous Lm. 8 Procter Street, Salem, MA 01970 617 745= S. It
ply
`U C"c".;'t E O
February 13 , 1984 'GF.- 4= t'q °'A5$,
City of Salem
Building Inspector
Salem City Hall
Salem, MA 01970
Attention Mr. McIntosh
Dear Mr . McIntosh :
Enclosed you will find a photostat of the registered letter
that I sent to Maurice Gauthier in Beverly . I called Mr .
Gauthier , as their was no reply to my letter , and he
indicated to me that he never did receive the letter . This
letter was with reference to his tenants parking all over
our property. They (tenants) don' t pay any attention to us ,
they even indicated that they were told by Mrs . Gauthier
that could park wherever they chose.
To insure that they received a copy of the letter , as Mr .
Gauthier said he never received my original letter , I sent
another registered letter . A few days later Mrs. Gauthier
called me, and wanted to know why I was sending registered
letters to her , she didn ' t want any registered letters and
they would not accept. I told her that if they never
received the first letter , I could not understand why they
would refuse a registered letter , especially if they didn' t
know what it was all about .
I advised Mrs . Gauthier why I was writing , and she said as
long as she gets the rent she ' s not interested in what they
do with the property. This almost indicates , if she is
telling the truth, that she is renting the property to one
individual only , that he is responsible for letting the
property out to various people . There is no question in my
mind that the property is being used as a rooming house.
With the number of cars that are parked in and around , there
is no place for them to park unless they park on our
property or in the street.
However , there is one individual that I have left several
notices on his car asking him not to park in the
right-of-way, he has ignored me completely . Therefore , on
Sunday , Feb . 5 , we had his car towed .
BATTERY CHARGERS • BATTERY TESTERS • GOLF CART AUTOMATIC ELECTRONIC CHARGERS • MARINE CHARGERS
ENGINE STANDBY CHARGERS • DIGITAL BATTERY VOLT-TESTERS 0 ELECTRODYNE TRUCK-MARINE H.D. ALTERNATORS
2
The individual acted like a maniac . He was hollering and
screaming and using very abusive language. He was advised
if there was any matter in question to just come into the
office to see me , but he never did come in. That evening I
had an icepick put through my car tire twice. There were
two holes , 2" apart , no indication that the tire had run
over anything . The people who fixed the tire said that
there was no doubt it had been punctured with an ice pick or
similar object.
These individuals have gotten to the point where they are
now being abusive. They' re acting like we are trespassing
on their rights instead of the other way around . This
situation has become very strained and we are hoping that we
get some relief . If they are using this property as a
rooming house , which I strongly suspect , of which my only
objection is the parking .
We have lost the use of our shipping dock , and lately we
have been bringing items in through the office because the
truck drivers refuse to try to get into the yard because the
cars are in the way .
Because of the problem I am having next door , I am very much
concerned with Edward Mello ' s request to use his property on
the corner of Boston and Proctor St. ' s as wholly
residential , which sounds as though they could be letting
out single rooms, which sounds like double jeopardy to us.
They have also got minimum parking , 3 or 4 cars at the most .
If this petition is granted we will have a parking situation
that will be uncontrollable .
VeryYesidrent
curs ,
John urette
Vice
JJS/cek
cc Fran Grace , Counsillor-at-Large
enclosure
.cy3 �S% Ya'a^'xi-a as i ,y.{+ .,r l •xx?i # "'F; F'a 4m'Sx't�1+�5�^ ' .+.` +e'a�i��i
.'a�Y"Et
. 9++k#1+
�Wk '�3 s -x a }'r s h J ... '4wf'?ri'nzM'�4�J'4 `^Y'n� jT �w�wi5a�eYmn. 'fie .:yw" '3 "�' '' F�Y"✓A'�-��.��,�eA'�A'�" �4
x ,s., bix ^• fi �, n,:�:Fa aa'^ .v.al»'^ru*9.'s.m vim, s`„-':` ' °t4 a•'�p .fiwj:
34'`,'. K'�FN'� $ 1'. e x r 4i`„ "F >r*�� � q. p. ra.r nw.,u. � .C-.. �,e• <vaw, nJy.
,x-54,�;�"}�,r " t.yr xks a" 6 n t a�` �'�k�'�•` ' �"�Y r �. +k .w GS�tt'y�•Yx�`,'�, hPp xJ"� z�rx,
M, t :~h}, ✓ ,} a 'cz "5� '� Rms --"�-1p,ID A+�'e'3-vri
4� r ,.q }".Wrf
xs x[ A U x x lbw as w y
>• '+' �� �'1 IG< �h,.�.>Ix ++i a'�h 'M'9t'a'ty r8 ".n�s ( t:� 8.»1 f�f +,
ti�° -°' +' �' .C4� 7Y4 "...
A' R ,'.
a l� n ''^r� r Td t ,�.L,+n 'p;
♦: r) "� :a J i v,f�&4 .F n k6'b�i, _ Spy 4 a�.'*as'e`..;
gks><;xan r'vcta :.- ' rua�,3fi ',4".'e' & x � +-b'�y z ,. > .P' r ay r<
�a �..
i -i T:�^ d J h `c, rr d §r'a}ptY��'�.+fi �3} - � �f RI • � C;f y Y ��
H•fit�4 n�kih f� 4 }�- �' 1V�YK R �] � � r 4 �
x � T
*,SENDER: Complete Berns i,2. 3,.and 440d your address
" > RA a `.SDa>cBe on reverse In ULB'RETURN
a
(CONSULT POSMAM.FOR FEES)„ ; Taj •, � a
a
u ',`s 1 Toe totlovinp sefultB IS(aTus4e0(tllxk m 0 � ...
• ftw N wtrom aro Me daMared:.: v „* - r '>✓ r�, }
Same b WWW, .eafa and aeemst of deaerY pp i `^� nr , + 'i r a-
�JrCKta* xs.rt»t N O
al 2 ❑flESTRILTED DELIYEItY y a^•� ?`^ -x
}r,pF ,",oro mmk7e0 aw^mry7m is chow bi ie00an as '+` >°3},,��,,
�^;x brM mono rxdW feel k t 'a" ,+ rnE;er53�'u� sg "`g
7 r ":a•," '.d IA b,' `4TflTA��.6—°�� #r w A. ly 4] �.t,. RA
3ARTTICLE ADDRESSED T�0/. ^• '�2�, � � `1,' ys s 4, r+ `>vy, '''8y`
' 'T�� i •l/j A``rp h 4.. ']' x, 1 ; .
t J
4.sM Of SERVICE NUMBER
ISTERED DMINSpURm 't
ti CERTIFIED.^ �-
=:�ANnys ONmin I F1 Id-fift ae r art)
{ Q
£ +i IAma RMNaC araruda 017c710a0 aaae .{ +z;)f1c E+k r i n t� ','i}$j45 ,•p •Z z m .❑ _ ��t� 3;J�r '.
E S�RNATURE ❑A00ressea �llvamlzad apem ' y a '" $��, �� � ° � o � �—•J
h t xr
� < o�'
4P m v
x t Iy .0 p
7; £ VSTMARK
DA
t rt 1 6 AODRESSFE SADDf7E5S P*If S ' ` r *+�
�`] � M ] ♦ ro i, 5' }td .rr S'���-5'�a C�� d; T$�" 'F R-�.k b_} �s .. � .,�,�' > f
p 1+4^�
UNABLE TO DEUVERpEGpIJISE 3 7a E S
is
4
-^ - `w ,.w-w6YQ iaB�97abB3 .,.,.,,, - x .j^ ✓\•. �! 1
Y jsy tea, s • .`!r^ (."'c 4x er " 4- }f'pxs r" ",`na�4.j :'""' .•� E ilP�' I ."dR 4
afrtr}�� �`��`''.
�r ♦fir x: 9 a R '' ads iK,,"'v++x fi £ 5 �Y4pa�'aS�I. x ^b•r:$ � a fa.,.
:� ��mn xvmV°
m � . -„UNttED STATES
b
y «r y l Y
.i i x �...,r ' .�} - wsq.y. _ �. J . .D... . _..+«� .... .. . -.. . , �.> /J _ 7L•.�'�.k
§y