Loading...
9 POPE STREET - R-2 - BUILDING INSPECTION 9 POPE STREET KEN STEADMAN/ JIM FLYNN (R-2) �z-�,� �� c� -a� � �� /'� k 4 f k E y;/�1 r� �C� 5 :` Tito of �$ulem, nssucltusetts ja Boar3 of Aupral DECISION ON THE PETITION OF KEN STEADMAN/JIM FLYNN FOR#IRVZA#12 d p ON MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN BUILDINGS AND VARIANCE FRP MULTI- HM CJS USE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 9 POPE STREET (R-1) 0��ir ,,cLLH H RY 0j. 4SS A hearing on this petition was held March 15, 1995 with the followlR Board members present: Gary M. Barrett, Chairman(acting) ; Arthur Labreque, Joseph Ywuc, Nina Cohen and Albert Hill. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioner, owner of the property located at 9 Pope Street request a Variance on minimum lot distance between buildings and Variance from Multi-Family . The relief which has been requested may be granted upon a finding of this Board that: 1 . Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other land, buildings, or structures in the same district. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner. 3. Desirable refuel may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogation from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful considerations the evidence presented at the hearing, makes the following findings of fact: 1. Petitioners Ken Steadman/Jim Flynn sought variance from rear setback requirements and minimum distance between buildings to allow development of a 4 unit condominium complex to be built on the property at 9 Pope Street. 2. Plans submitted by petitioner showed a proposed development of four separate single-family homes with garages, connected by a paved access road in the form of a cul-de-cas. 3. Approval of the petitioner's proposed development plan was voiced by Steven Baliotis, owner of Ideal Fishing Co. at 15 Proctor St. , Sharon Maraffa, of 8 Pope Street and Thomas Brophy of 25 Proctor St. 4. Three abutters gave guarded approval, expressing concern over the potential effect that the proposed development could have on an existing drainage problem in the lower part of Pope Street. State- ments by Mike Allen, 15 Pope St. ,Marion Tina of 43 Proctor St. and Robin Allen of 17 Pope St. attested to the presence of standing water in the street and in their properties following rainy weather. DECISION OF KEN STEADMAN! T7M FLYNN FOR A VARIANCE OF MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN', BUILDINGS AND VARIANCE OF ?JLTI-FAM IT Y USE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 9 POPE STREET. fR-1 page two 5. Speaking for both developers, Ken Steadman stated that he w4ld asyf his engineers to investigate the standing water problem. &,,i der'too to follow up with the abutters to ensure that the new developojit wo ,$ not worsent he existing water problem. y � � On the basis of the above f'_ndings of fact, and on the evidence present •ee at the hearings, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1. Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property and not the district in general. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substation hardship to the petitioner. 3. The request relief can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying and substantially derogating from the intent of the district or purpose of the Ordinance. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 3-0, to grant the requested relief, subject to the following conditions: 1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, ordinances, codes and regulations. 2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted. 3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety shall be strictly adhered to. 4. Petitioner shall obtain a building permit prior to beginning any construction. 5. Petitioner shall obtain proper street numbering from the City of Salem Assessor's Office and shall display said number so as to be visible from the street. 6. A Certificate of Occupancy is to be obtained. 7. Petitioner is to obtain approval from any City Board or Commission having jurisdiction including, but no t limited to, the Planning Board. Variance Granted March 15, 1995 r,J Nina Cohen Board of Appeal. Member A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision. if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City clerk. Pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11, the Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. Board of Appeal c� Q9 � o n / in V, f T � f a Citu of tzlemcfgussadluBetts Boura of `Au}rezil CISION ON THE MINIMUM DISTANCETBETWEENION OF KBUILDIEN NGSS ANDVARIANCE �,7M FLYNN FOR�i�yMULTI-� ON USE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 9 POPE STREET (R-1) rfi1 CSI-p� ;ill' M4SS A hearing on this petition was held March 15, 1995 with the followlq Board members present: Gary M. Barrett, Chairman(acting) ; Arthur Labreque, Joseph Ywuc, Nina Cohen and Albert Hill. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioner, owner of the property located at 9 Pope Street request a Variance on minimum lot distance between buildings and Variance from Multi-Family . The relief which has been requested may be granted upon a finding of this Board that: 1. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other land, buildings, or structures in the same district. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner. 3. Desirable refuel may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogation from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful considerations the evidence presented at the hearing, makes the following findings of fact: 1. Petitioners Ken Steadman/Jim Flynn sought variance from rear setback requirements and minimum distance between buildings to allow development of a 4 unit condominium complex to be built on the property at 9 Pope Street. 2. Plans submitted by petitioner showed a proposed development of four separate single-family homes with garages, connected by a paved access road in the form of a cul-de-cas. 3. Approval of the petitioner's proposed development plan was voiced by Steven Baliotis, owner of Ideal Fishing Co. at 15 Proctor St. , Sharon Maraffa, of 8 Pope Street and Thomas Brophy of 25 Proctor St. 4. Three abutters gave guarded approval, expressing concern over the potential effect that the proposed development could have on an existing drainage problem in the lower part of Pope Street. State- ments by Mike Allen, 15 Pope St. ,Marion Tina of 43 Proctor St. and Robin Allen of 17 Pope St. attested to the presence of standing water in the street and in their properties following rainy weather. DECISION OF KEN STEADMAN/,7Ihi FLYNN FOR A VARIANCE OF MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN BUILDINGS AND VARIANCE OF P1LTl-FP ii LY' USE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 9 POPE STREET. fR-11 page two 5. Speaking for both developers, Ken Steadman stated that he wewld asly, his engineers to investigate the standing water problem. I��Ynder�o,��t } to follow up with the abutters to ensure that the new, develo*Jk woif not worsent he existing water problem. y /. r on the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence present fe at the hearings, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1. Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property and not the district in general. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substation hardship to the petitioner. 3. The request relief can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying and substantially derogating from the intent of the district or purpose of the Ordinance. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the requested relief, subject to the following conditions: 1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, ordinances, codes and regulations. 2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted. 3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety shall be strictly adhered to. 4. Petitioner shall obtain a building permit prior to beginning any construction. 5. Petitioner shall obtain proper street numbering from the City of Salem Assessor's Office and shall display said number so as to be visible from the street. 6. A Certificate of Occupancy is to be obtained. 7. Petitioner is to obtain approval from any City Board or Commission having jurisdiction including, but no t limited to, the Planning Board. Variance Granted March 15, 1995 Nina Cohen Board of Appeal, Member A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, :f any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11, the Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. Board of Appeal 4 �45q lam,J� n Chi of �ttlem, ��ttsstttlju�etts �gnttra of �Au}teitl DECISION ON THE PETITION OF KEN STEADMAN/JIM FLYNN FOR NA8V;RIA0PF095 ON MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN BUILDINGS AND VARIANCE FRFR MULTI- �� USE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 9 POPE STREET (R-1) Ol ; l �1 ( R{ Sl y j MASS A hearing on this petition was held March 15, 1995 with the followNE Board members present: Gary M. Barrett, Chairman(acting) ; Arthur Labreque, Joseph Ywuc, Nina Cohen and Albert Hill. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioner, owner of the property located at 9 Pope Street request a Variance on minimum lot distance between buildings and Variance from Multi-Family . The relief which has been requested may be granted upon a finding of this Board that: 1. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other land, buildings, or structures in the same district. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner. 3. Desirable refuel may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogation from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful considerations the evidence presented at the hearing, makes the following findings of fact: 1. Petitioners Ken Steadman/Jim Flynn sought variance from rear setback requirements and minimum distance between buildings to allow development of a 4 unit condominium complex to be built on the property at 9 Pope Street. 2. Plans submitted by petitioner showed a proposed development of four separate single-family homes with garages, connected by a paved access road in the form of a cul-de-cas. 3. Approval of the petitioner's proposed development plan was voiced by Steven Baliotis, owner of Ideal Fishing Co. at 15 Proctor St. , Sharon Maraffa, of 8 Pope Street and Thomas Brophy of 25 Proctor St. 4. Three abutters gave guarded approval, expressing concern over the potential effect that the proposed development could have on an existing drainage problem in the lower part of Pope Street. State- ments by Mike Allen, 15 Pope St. ,Marion Tina of 43 Proctor St. and Robin Allen of 17 Pope St. attested to the presence of standing water in the street and in their properties following rainy weather. ' DECISION OF KEN STEADMAN/JIM FLYNN FOR A VARIANCE OF MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN BUILDINGS AND VARIANCE OF MULTI-FA:; ILY USE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 9 POPE STREET. (R-1 page two 5. Speaking for both developers, Ken Steadman stated that he wdald asV,, his engineers to investigate the standing water problem. &,f?ndern to follow up with the abutters to ensure that the new develop'�j woifl not worsent he existing water problem. /' �� On the basis of the' above findings of fact, and on the evidence present ¢ at the hearings, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1. Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property and not the district in general. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substation hardship to the petitioner. 3. The request relief can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying and substantially derogating from the intent of the district or purpose of the Ordinance. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the requested relief, subject to the following conditions: 1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, ordinances, codes and regulations. 2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted. 3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety shall be strictly adhered to. 4. Petitioner shall obtain a building permit prior to beginning any construction. 5. Petitioner shall obtain proper street numbering from the City of Salem Assessor's Office and shall display said number so as to be visible from the street. 6. A Certificate of Occupancy is to be obtained. 7. Petitioner is to obtain approval from any City Board or Commission having jurisdiction including, but no t limited to, the Planning Board. Variance Granted March 15, 1995 Nina Cohen Board of Appeal, Member A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, If any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Massachusetts General : aws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11, the Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. Board of Appeal IL ? U / 0 s . . . . . . . . . . . . . � . . . . . . . . . ' 'tet �i211 III �`lilPlit. ,:.1'Lc'I�ScTLfT1I$PIfS ;. i!xIIIIrII III tTPPZil 'ptcrmn. . - THE BOARO OF APPEALS : e na�r�ianeq� represent that 'e are .^e owners a certain parcel of land located Pope .t. et, _„nina6Jistrict. . . . . . re . . . . . .R- . . . _ __-.. �. .s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : --.no , -aid parce � - _ � � -c tet" cect.onis , . . . . . a -7e .'assacnusetts State Buildina Ccae. fans zescribing the work proposed, .-ave been submitted to the inspector of Buildings in accoroance with Section IX A. 1 of the Zoning Ordinance. Direct Appeal � m _- � .�' O r Uj 7 j c'�Z C.D The Application for Permit was denied by the Inspector of Buildings for the following -reasons: Direct Appeal The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforce1jent of said Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero- gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for -the following reasons: Install variance on minimum depth or rear yard from 30 ft. to 20 ft. Install variance on minimun distance between buildings from 40 ft. to 15 ft. Install variance from Multi-Family use. Owner. Kep. S 4f.az?.aW.4>.m-T'IY n. .. . . . ... . . . Address 73. yilla9e.St, . .R'1a>:blehead, .MA. .... .. Tel ephone.W 7). 63173751 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Petitioner.William.A, _Quigl(�y, .Jr.. .Esq. .. . . Address . Zero, Spring,St, , ,M�zb�ehead, .MA. . . . . =ate. . Febri4azy, .1-Q,, .1.9.9.5, . . eleohone (617 . 631-7777. By -hree copies of the application rust be filed with the secreta, y of the Board of ;opeais with a check, for advertisina in the amount of. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 'our weeks prior to the meeting_ of `.he Boara of Aopeais . :.;heck a able to The venina News. I: Ci S C: v. NO. ! °.'I II ION 1'O BOARD OI' AVITAI.S I ocA'I IoN in Tf-11111;N1'R._.....__..;.._._._ ......_....:... � . ...... ........ ....... [ ONDI I IONS I ry SU ................... fit^: .«.. '.a t I•Ii'I1I ION AI IMA'dI.-...............:. ❑ M:NII:D......................... _ .............. _... 19......... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ �LIU III � -iairm. — lssarimuifs gi p':•�1V �IIraII III .u}JT211 �c -i 'HE SOARD OF APPEALS : `e na�rsiane represent t;`at a are :.`.e owners a certain oarcel or land located �ope gSt: ' et: Sonina D strict. . . . . . re . . . . --- . • • na -ala carte ! , =Clea c'! _ectionts ; . . .. . assacnusetts Mate uiidina CLde. ' ans :escribing the work proposed, rave been submittea to the inspector of Buildings in :ccoraance with Section IX A. 1 of the Zoning Ordinance. Direct Appeal t-- C" `� WLU o UjN e O T'- The Application for Permit was denied by the Inspector of Buildings for th''zjol%ing reasons: Direct Appeal The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero- gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for -the following reasons: Install variance on minimum depth or rear yard from 30 ft. to 20 ft. Install variance on minimun distance between buildings from 40 ft. to 15 ft. Install variance from Multi-Family use. Owner. YW. 6t�a(AW.and.Jj.TXl1mn. .. . ..... .. Address.7.3. Vzllag(?.St. , .Marblebead, .MA. .... . Teleonone.(617). 63J73751 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Petitioner. William.A;,Qu gl�y, ,Jz,, , .address . Zero. Spring.St, ,-M4rblebead, .MB. . . . -ace. . FgJQr14q zy. .1.4,. .1.9.9.5. . . ,. By-eleonone (617Table . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -hree conies of the application must be filed with the _Secrrd of ;ooeais ,pith a check. ,-or advertising in the amount tf. . . . . : . . . . . tour Weexs crior to the meeting_ of the Boaro of Aooeais. =:, he .vemno news. h 11:111 ION 7O IIUARD 1)P APITAI S tu'AIWN ItI NIR ._....__.... _...... ................ r, i I I ONI)I I IONS sC rrrl I ION AI'I ko Vrl)..................•. ❑ 1)I:NII:l)............... ......... s y h 0 ° Y6 AC ro � c Q Al ra l q td q- 74 74 c 9 c )Z a e0sr >, r O► 4t'to l a" e. R2 oos as_as h ROUTE 107 rp00 oa-7o's as STREET Xss ti,9 —►. 49 140-8 _ a3 Soo a 0 38 71 'as 0� y 0 ryJ w 320 O N Ay 321 /4sai 9r � N 2q, r, g RKI, PZO, pARKttyg 304 y �^ s2oc' I78 RSC 3!9 r F T 15374 a `�' - r i m p o tat ti i i k ca slj8Sr4troN k tl x C gds 9 3 >� 326 3 • s . 5190 e A100 a 447031 , \ Q ' 2 2 0 00 'yA 6000�� 5838 a � 1 !G`�y P •316 '' / / / ° G 1950 .. �� 20 �J 13 18 a p rt /_ �b0AC- 0 re 3 LAGOON/ a� 000 9 a Is A Ac O jn< >, PLAN GRQVNQ 0 V4-41'DJ.11.JV.SJ.SLUUY-L 1VLL]Ll. ' t CITY OF SALEM BOARD OF APPEAL. 745.9595 Ext- 381 Will hold a public hearing for all persons inter- ested in the petition submitted by REN STEAD- MANtJIM FLYNN for a Variance on minimum depth or rear yard from 30 ft. to 20 ft.,Variance on minimum distance between buildings from 40 ft.to 15 ft., Variance from Multi-Family Use for the property located at 9 POPE STREET (R-2). Said hearing to be held WEDNESDAY,MARCH 15,1995 AT 6:00 P.M.,ONE SALEM GREEN,see- and floor. STEPHEN TOUCHETTE, Chairman March 1, 8, 1995 SN42864 iji YyY i'i i i Y Yui Y Y r M s Y M r r r ! 4S a ' i YYYri'YY Y i, Y r Y r r r r V i Af: TO �� r tMx 5a i � � e sit w I S'YJ✓l��^M��S{l�-�i 5 4 4 � f i DATE OF HEARING PETITIONER r l� ✓w LOCATION MOTION: TO GRANT SECOND AMENDMENT SECOND TO DENY SECOND TO RE-HEAR SECOND WITHDRAW SECOND CONTINUE SECOND ROLL CALL PRESENT GRANT _ DENY AMEND WITHDRAW RE-HEAR CONTINUE GARY M. BARRETT ALBERT C. HILL STEPHEN O'GRADY STEPHEN TOUCHETTE NINA V. COHEN / ASSOCIATE MEMBERS / ARTHUR LEBRECQUE CONDITIONS: /1 \ 1�f l/�` d- t A, N/F ALBERT G. EISEN NSF j CITY OF SALEM w 1/3/95 FOUNDA7JONSROAD - --- g5� ro F N Jss .pp, 22.00 E ��� ©N 1'2-40'17" 9 LOT 1 DESCR1P770 az.c' N EY 29, 196 S. F• �k 44.0' JAMES H. MCDONALD 5 \F 01' co F N/F CITY OF SALEM R c W alb f` IU .r 30' u cn r N 1� � o ";.422 \ PAVED � DRIVE cqi LOT 2 °'C�l GRAPHIC SCALE t, 20 n 10 ao 40 en z 2¢ec' __ a . ...: _ .•... ... . ._. ` R 15' 20.M' I� R 15' IN FEF+ ) 166.89' i inch = 20 M N i 9'33'34" E SALEM, MAS SAC H U S ETTS PLAN OF LAND PREPARED FOR: NOTE: THERE' ARE A TOTAL OF POPE STREET REALTY TRUST FOUR DWELLING UNITS. EACH UNIT PAPE . STREET � T , HAS ONE PARKING IN A GARAGE AND ONE PARKING IN FRONT OF THE BUILDING. REID LAND SURVEYORS R�! PLAN REFERENCE: 365 CHATHAM STREET / S LYNN, MASSACHUSETTS PLAN BOOK ?_69 PLAN. 16 s R94-072 DATE: NOV. 25, 1994 SCALE: 1 ', = 20' t ...�_ _� _ _ l I j i . , 3' {`_ � ��� ._ [[ i }�fl ��, ` S T �� �` .. �# �� ��� .. � .f _____ ___ __ _ _ __ _ _.__.__. .. _�_- ,.._ _. _ _.. � _. -._. _._�_ � ..,.. �l _ ....__ .. _.__ _._. r I I i r N/F ALBERT G. EISEN NSF CITY OF SALEM s: I i � 1/3/95 FOUNDATIONS & ROAD 52 � N36,49 g>OO 0 36 49 Sg" 22.00 I 1�� f ooN 12'40'17" E 5 ' LOT 1 N0. DA TE DESCRIPTION BY 29 ? 196 + S. F. 6 44.0' NSF \ 2�, 9• JAMES H. MCDONALD `, 30.0' n S` g. , 2 2� I N/F �o2<°L� CITY OF SALEM Ari S� \ 4 44 20.0' 0) R 30' n ^ %A4 p b �[ JJ �►Taa+r� \ PAVED � DRIVE co6 ` LOT 2 o N r GRAPHIC SCALE -ff 20.00. 20 0 10 20 40 8^ _ Z IT iR = 15 20.00 _ ..._ ----- I_ R = 15' ( IN FEET ) 166.89' 1 inch = 20 ft N 19'33'34" E SALEM , MASSACHUSETTS II' PLAN OF LAND PREPARED FOR: I POPE p c NOTE: THERE ARE A TOTAL OF POPE STREET REALTY TRUST` # I- Ot`n E STREET FOUR DWELLING UNITS. EACH UNIT HAS ONE PARKING IN A GARAGE AND ONE PARKING IN FRONT OF THE BUILDING. REID LAND SURVEYORS \ 365 CHATHAM STREET PLAN RE,-PR NCE: LYNN, MASSACHUSETTS PLAN BOOK 269 PLAN 16 \ R94-072 DATE: Nov. 25, 1994 SCALE: 1 = 20' ft.. � .. .fir ..• T i i F A 1r0 i N/F ALBERT G. EISEN NSF r CITY OF SALEM 1/3195 i FOUNDATIONS & ROAD �L N600 \ -- 3g 49 s8" 22.00. 1i f pN 12'40117" E — S ('� g 0 LOT 1 NO. DATE DESCRIPTION BY azd ��' 6 <129, 196 � - S. F. Rc �9Gj "\ 14.0' N/F 1� JAMES H. MCDONALD 5 obIwM cp /r. IN CITY OF SALEM a NS 0 s ✓ M 2• kOF H S Ag PAL TILID nLID r j V t o.2'122 o, I- s � PAVED l � DRIVEfo . LOT 2 N � _ N GRAPHIC SCALE � o • t� 20.00' i0 0 10 G z'0 40 Do 1 \ R 15' 20.00 __ . - ..... L R= 15' ( IN FEET ) 166.89' 1 Inch 4 20 St N 19'33'34" E SALEM , MASSACHUSETTS ,I PLAN OF LAND PREPARED FOR: POPE NOTE: THERE ARE A TOTAL OF POPE STREET FEALTY TRUST ; i POPE STREET FOUR DWELLING UNITS. EACH UNIT HAS ONE PARKING IN A GARAGE AND ONE PARKING IN FRONT OF REID LAND SURVEYORS THE BUILDING. �R,� 365 CHATHAM STREET PLAN REFERENCE LYNN, MASSACHUSETTS .L PLAN BOOK 26Q., PLAN 16 I R94-072 DATE: NOV. 25, 1994 SCALE: 1 — 20