1 WATERS STREET - ZONING (2) 1
Commonwealth of Massachusetts For On
Executive Office oJEnvironmementa!Affairs
Executive Office of Environmental
Affairs MEPA Office EOEA No.:
MEPA Analyst: RECEIVED
Environmental Phone: 617-626- JUL 13 007
Notification Form DEPT.OF PLANNING&
The information requested on this form must be completed to begin MEPA Review in
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
accordance with the provisions of the Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act, 301 CMR
11.00.
Project Name: Black Cow Restaurant
Street: 1 Water Street
Municipality: Beverly Watershed: Atlantic Ocean
Universal Tranverse Mercator Coordinates: Latitude: 42 -32'-27"N
'
Longitude: 70-53'-8" W
Estimated commencement date: Fall 2007 Estimated completion date: Spring 2008
Approximate cost: $2.5 million dollars Status of project design: 25 %complete
Proponent: Joseph A. Leone, c/o Black Cow Restaurant
Street: P. O. Box 2490
Municipality: South Hamilton State: MA Zip Code: 01982
' Name of Contact Person From Whom Copies of this ENF May Be Obtained:
William R. Bergeron, P.E.
Firm/Agency: Hayes Engineering Inc. Street: 603 Salem Street
Municipality: Wakefield State: MA I Zip Code: 01880
Phone: 1-781-246-2800 Fax:1-781-246-7596 Email: bbergeron@hayeseng.com
' Does this project meet or exceed a mandatory EIR threshold (see 301 CMR 11.03)?
Has this project been filed with MEPA before?❑Yes E No
❑Yes (EDEA No. ) E No
Has any project on this site been filed with MEPA before?
' ❑Yes (EDEA No. ) E No
Is this an Expanded ENF (see 301 CMR 11.05(7)) requesting:
' a Single EIR? (see 301 CMR 11.06(8)) ❑Yes ENo
a Special Review Procedure? (see 301 CMR 11.09) ❑Yes ENo
a Waiver of mandatory EIR? (see 301 CMR 11.11) ❑Yes ENo
a Phase I Waiver? (see 301 CMR 11.11) ❑Yes ENo
Identify any financial assistance or land transfer from an agency of the Commonwealth, including
the agency name and the amount of funding or land area (in acres):
' Lease from the City of Beverly.
Are you requesting coordinated review with any other federal, state, regional, or local agency?
EYes (Chapter 91 License & Wetlands filing with Beverly Conservation ) [:]No
' 1
1
' List Local or Federal Permits and Approvals:
Site Plan Review with Beverly Planning Board
Order of Conditions from Beverly Conservation Commission
Which ENF or EIR review threshold(s) does the project meet or exceed (see 301 CMR 11.03):
' ❑ Land ❑ Rare Species ® Wetlands, Waterways, & Tidelands
❑ Water ❑ Wastewater ❑ Transportation
Energy
El Air El Solid & Hazardous Waste
EJ ACEC
❑ Regulations ❑ Historical &Archaeological
Resources
' Summary of Project Size Existing Change Total State Permits &
& Environmental Impacts Approvals
' ® Order of Conditions
Total site acreage 0.96 ❑ Superseding Order of
Conditions
' New acres of land altered 0.0 ® Chapter 91 License
Acres of impervious area 0.94 0.16 0,7g ❑ 401 Water Quality
Square feet of new bordering 0.0 Certification
' vegetated wetlands alteration ® MHD or MDC Access
Permit
Square feet of new other ❑ Water Management
wetland alteration Act Permit
' Acres of new non-water ❑ New Source Approval
dependent use of tidelands or 0.27 El or MWRA
waterways Sewer Connection/
Extension Permit
® Other Permits
Gross square footage 9,216 -332 8,884 (including Legislative
— —
Number of housing units Approvals)— Specify:
Maximum height (in feet) 30+/- Less than 35 Less than 35 Approval in accordance
' with Article 97 Provisions
TRANSPORTATION
Vehicle trips per day 77 598 675
Parking spaces 44 22 66
' Gallons/day (GPD) of water use 0 6,393 6,393
GPD water withdrawal
' GPD wastewater generation/ 0 6,393 6,393
treatment
Length of water/sewer mains
1 (in miles)
' 2
1
' CONSERVATION LAND: Will the project involve the conversion of public parkland or other Article 97 public
natural resources to any purpose not in accordance with Article 97?
❑Yes (Specify ) ®No
Will it involve the release of any conservation restriction, preservation restriction, agricultural preservation
restriction, or watershed preservation restriction?
®Yes (Specify) [-]No
It is not believed to be necessary, but the Issue is being clarified by the City of Beverly through Its Planning
and Development Department and EOEA Department of Conservation and Recreation
RARE SPECIES: Does the project site include Estimated Habitat of Rare Species, Vernal Pools, Priority
Sites of Rare Species, or Exemplary Natural Communities?
[]Yes (Specify ) ®No - based on July 14, 2006 Maps
' HISTORICAL/ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES: Does the project site include any structure, site or district
listed in the State Register of Historic Place or the inventory of Historic and Archaeological Assets of the
Commonwealth?
' ❑Yes (Specify ) ®No
If yes, does the project involve any demolition or destruction of any listed or inventoried historic or
archaeological resources?
' ❑Yes (Specify. ) ®No
AREAS OF CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN: Is the project in or adjacent to an Area of Critical
Environmental Concern?
❑Yes (Specify ) ®No- Nota listed ACEC area
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project description should include (a) a description of the
project site, (b) a description of both on-site and off-site alternatives and the impacts associated
' with each alternative, and (c) potential on-site and off-site mitigation measures for each alternative
(You may attach one additional page, if necessary.)
I'I The existing site consists of approximately 41 668 square feet The prior use was for a McDonalds'
fast food restaurant with a drive through window. The use was terminated in 1995 and has been
basically vacant since. The entire site, as shown on the attached photo shows the existing
conditions. The entire site except for some foundation plantings at the building is impervious The
proposed Black Cow Restaurant will revitalize the area and provide an economic benefit to the City of
Beverly while enhancing the waterfront area The current parking and pavement areas on the
existing pier and adiacent land area will be made available for public use and will extend the existing
park area. There will be an increase of the site parking and six spaces will be set aside for DPA
exclusive use. The proposed building will be located away from the existing coastal bank and will
result in no resource area disturbance. The proposed new use will have minimal off-site impacts
relative to traffic and utilities,and will be significantly less than the prior McDonalds' use The
retention of the existing no-build condition will result in the continued decay of the structure and
result in a negative impact to this gateway site and the existing park. The structure will also continue
to be an economic drain to the City of Beverly as well as a potential fire hazard. The proposed
redevelopment of the site will provide the City of Beverly with a positive economic benefit as well as
an enhanced public open area. The reuse of the site will result in less impervious area and the
Proposed improvements will incorporate enhanced stormwater treatment prior to connecting to the
existina drain line.
1
3
LAND SECTION— all proponents must fill out this section
1. Thresholds/ Permits
A. Does the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to land (see 301 CMR 11.03(1)
Yes X No; if yes, specify each threshold:
It. Impacts and Permits
A. Describe, in acres, the current and proposed character of the project site, as follows:
Existing Change Total
Footprint of buildings — 0.10 - 0_01 0.09
Roadways, parking, and other paved areas 0_70 - 0_16 0.54
Other altered areas (describe) 0.13 0.0 0.13
Undeveloped areas 0.03 + 0_17 0.20
' (landscaped and open space areas)
B. Has any part of the project site been in active agricultural use in the last three years?
_Yes X No; if yes, how many acres of land in agricultural use (with agricultural soils)will be
converted to nonagricultural use?
C. Is any part of the project site currently or proposed to be in active forestry use?
_Yes X No; if yes, please describe current and proposed forestry activities and indicate
whether any part of the site is the subject of a DEM-approved forest management plan.
1 D. Does any part of the project involve conversion of land held for natural resources purposes in
accordance with Article 97 of the Amendments to the Constitution of the Commonwealth to any
purpose not in accordance with Article 97? X Yes _No; if yes, describe:
1 It is not believed to be necessarybut the issue Is being clarified by the City of Beverly through its
Planning and Development Department and EDEA. Department of Conservation and Recreation
E. Is any part of the project site currently subject to a conservation restriction, preservation
restriction, agricultural preservation restriction or watershed preservation restriction? X Yes
No; if yes, does the project involve the release or modification of such restriction? _Yes
X No; if yes, describe:
It is not believed to be necessary, but the issue is being clarified by the City of Beverly through its
Planning and Development Department and EOEA Department of Conservation and Recreation
F. Does the project require approval of a new urban redevelopment project or a fundamental
change in an existing urban redevelopment project under M.G.L.c.121A? Yes X No; if yes,
describe:
1 G. Does the project require approval of a new urban renewal plan or a major modification of an
existing urban renewal plan under M.G.L.c.121 B?Yes _No X ; if yes, describe:
H. Describe the project's stormwater impacts and, if applicable, measures that the project will take
to comply with the standards found in DEP's Stormwater Management Policy.
The Stormwater Management Policy will be complied with to the extent required by the Beverly
Conservation Commission.
I. Is the project site currently being regulated under M.G.L.c.21 E or the Massachusetts
IContingency Plan? Yes _No X ; if yes,what is the Release Tracking Number(RTN)?
4
J. If the project site is within the Chicopee or Nashua watershed, is it within the Quabbin, Ware, or
Wachusett subwatershed?_Yes X No; if yes, is the project site subject to regulation under the
Watershed Protection Act?_Yes _No
K. Describe the project's other impacts on land:
The Proposed oroiect will reduce Present pavement areas enhance the open space and add a plaza for
the DPA accessory uses The oroiect is in keeping with the City of Beverly's long-term reuse of this
site.
' III.. Consistency
A. Identify the current municipal comprehensive land use plan and the open space plan, and
' describe the consistency of the project and its impacts with that plan(s): Consistent with the City of
Beverly Land Use Plan. The proposed use will enhance the waterfront area and assist with the area
revitalization.
B. Identify the current Regional Policy Plan of the applicable Regional Planning Agency and describe
the consistency of the project and its impacts with that plan: Consistent with the City of Beverly
Master Plan. The proposed use will enhance the waterfront area and assist with the area revitalization
I C. Will the project require any approvals under the local zoning by-law or ordinance (i.e.text or map
amendment, special permit, or variance)? Yes X No _; if yes, describe: The oroiect will
require Site Plan Approval and local wetlands by-law approvals.
D. Will the project require local site plan or project impact review? X Yes _No; if yes, describe:
RARE SPECIES SECTION
1. Thresholds/Permits
' A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to rare species or habitat(see 301
CMR 11.03(2))? _Yes X No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms:
B. Does the project require any state permits related to rare species or habitat? _Yes X No
C. If you answered "No"to both questions A and B, proceed to the Wetlands,Waterways, and
Tidelands Section. If you answered "Yes"to either question A or question B,fill out the remainder
' of the Rare Species section below.
II. Impacts and Permits
' A. Does the project site fall within Priority or Estimated Habitat in the current Massachusetts Natural
Heritage Atlas (attach relevant page)? _Yes No. If yes,
1. Which rare species are known to occur within the Priority or Estimated Habitat(contact:
Environmental Review, Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program, Route 135,
Westborough, MA 01581, allowing 30 days for receipt of information):
2. Have you surveyed the site for rare species? _Yes_No; if yes, please include the
results of your survey.
3. If your project is within Estimated Habitat, have you filed a Notice of Intent or received an
Order of Conditions for this project? _Yes_No; if yes, did you send a copy of the
Notice of Intent to the Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program, in accordance
with the Wetlands Protection Act regulations? —Yes_No
B. Will the project "take" an endangered, threatened, and/or species of special concern in
accordance with M.G.L. c.131A (see also 321 CMR 10.04)? _Yes _No; if yes, describe:
5
C. Will the project alter"significant habitat"as designated by the Massachusetts Division of Fisheries
and Wildlife in accordance with M.G.L. c.1 31A(see also 321 CMR 10.30)? _Yes No; if yes,
describe:
D. Describe the project's other impacts on rare species including indirect impacts (for example,
stormwater runoff into a wetland known to contain rare species or lighting impacts on rare moth
habitat):
WETLANDS. WATERWAYS, AND TIDELANDS SECTION
I. Thresholds/Permits
A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to wetlands, waterways, and
1 tidelands (see 301 CMR 11.03(3))? _Yes X No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms:
B. Does the project require any state permits (or a local Order of Conditions)related to wetlands,
waterways, or tidelands? X Yes _No; if yes, specify which permit: Chapter 91 License and
local Order of Conditions.
C. If you answered "No"to both questions A and B, proceed to the Water Supply Section. If you
answered "Yes"to either question A or question B,fill out the remainder of the Wetlands, Waterways,
and Tidelands Section below.
II. Wetlands Impacts and Permits
A. Describe any wetland resource areas currently existing on the project site and indicate them on
the site plan: The proposed new building will not disturb any wetland resource areas
B. Estimate the extent and type of impact that the project will have on wetland resources,and
indicate whether the impacts are temporary or permanent:
Coastal Wetlands Area (in square feet)or Length (in linear feet'
Land Under the Ocean
Designated Port Areas Parcel•41,668 sq.ft. Proposed work•11,970 sg ft
Coastal Beaches
Coastal Dunes
Barrier Beaches
Coastal Banks
Rocky Intertidal Shores
Salt Marshes
Land Under Salt Ponds
Land Containing Shellfish
Fish Runs
Land Subject to Coastal Storm Flowage Entire site
' Inland Wetlands
Bank
Bordering Vegetated Wetlands
Land under Water
Isolated Land Subject to Flooding
Bordering Land Subject to Flooding
Riverfront Area
6
' C. Is any part of the project
1. a limited project? _Yes X No
' 2. the construction or alteration of a dam? _Yes X No; if yes, describe:
3. fill or structure in a velocity zone or regulatory floodway? _Yes X No
4. dredging or disposal of dredged material? _Yes X No; if yes, describe the volume
of dredged material and the proposed disposal site:
5. a discharge to Outstanding Resource Waters? Yes X No
6. subject to a wetlands restriction order? _Yes X No; if yes, identify the area (in
' square feet):
D. Does the project require a new or amended Order of Conditions under the Wetlands Protection
Act(M.G.L. c.1 31A)? X Yes _No; if yes, has a Notice of Intent been filed or a local Order of
1 Conditions issued? _Yes X No; if yes, list the date and DEP file number: .
Was the Order of Conditions appealed? _Yes No. Will the project require a variance from
the Wetlands regulations?_Yes
E. Will the project:
1. be subject to a local wetlands ordinance or bylaw? X Yes —No
2. alter any federally-protected wetlands not regulated under state or local law?
Yes X No; if yes, what is the area (in s.f.)?
F. Describe the project's other impacts on wetlands (including new shading of wetland areas or
removal of tree canopy from forested wetlands): No further impacts.
1 III. Waterways and Tidelands Impacts and Permits
A. Is any part of the project site waterways or tidelands (including filled former tidelands)that are
subject to the Waterways Act, M.G.L.c.91? X Yes =No; if yes, is there a current Chapter 91
license or permit affecting the project site? X Yes No; if yes, list the date and number:
License#1169 of 1889:#901 of 1982.and#4346 of 1995.
B. Does the project require a new or modified license under M.G.L.c.91? X Yes _No; if yes,
how many acres of the project site subject to M.G.L.c.91 will be for non-water dependent use?
ICurrent 0 Change 0.27 Total 0.27
License#1169 of 1889:#901 of 1982. and#4346 of 1995.
' C. Is any part of the project:
1. a roadway, bridge, or utility line to or on a barrier beach? _Yes X No; if yes,
describe:
2. dredging or disposal of dredged material? _Yes X No; if yes, volume of dredged
material:
3. a solid fill, pile-supported, or bottom-anchored structure in flowed tidelands or other
' waterways? _Yes X No; if yes,what is the base area?
4. within a Designated Port Area? X Yes No
D. Describe the project's other impacts on waterways and tidelands: The project will have no
' impact on waterways or tidelands.
7
1
iIV. Consistency:
A. Is the project located within the Coastal Zone X Yes _No; if yes, describe the project's
consistency with policies of the Office of Coastal Zone Management:
The Proposed site will enhance the surface water quality from the Pavement areas as well as
enhance and Provide more landscape and open space for the use of the general Public and
the adjacent Park area.
B. Is the project located within an area subject to a Municipal Harbor Plan? _Yes X No; if yes,
identify the Municipal Harbor Plan and describe the project's consistency with that plan:
WATER SUPPLY SECTION
1. Thresholds/Permits
A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to water supply(see 301 CMR
1 11.03(4))? _Yes X No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms:
B. Does the project require any state permits related to water supply? _Yes X No; if yes,
specify which permit:
C. If you answered "No"to both questions A and B, proceed to the Wastewater Section. If you
answered "Yes"to either question A or question B, fill out the remainder of the Water Supply Section
1 below.
It. Impacts and Permits
A. Describe, in gallons/day,the volume and source of water use for existing and proposed activities
at the project site:
Existing Change Total �
Withdrawal from groundwater
Withdrawal from surface water
Interbasin transfer
Municipal or regional water supply
1 B. If the source is a municipal or regional supply, has the municipality or region indicated that there is
adequate capacity in the system to accommodate the project? Yes No
C. If the project involves a new or expanded withdrawal from a groundwater or surface water source,
1. have you submitted a permit application? _Yes _No; if yes, attach the application.
2. have you conducted a pump test? _Yes _No; if yes, attach the pump test report.
D. What is the currently permitted withdrawal at the proposed water supply source (in gallons/day)?
Will the project require an increase in that withdrawal? Yes _No
' E. Does the project site currently contain a water supply well, a drinking water treatment facility,
water main, or other water supply facility, or will the project involve construction of a new facility?
_Yes _No. If yes, describe existing and proposed water supply facilities at the project site:
' Water supplywell(s) (capacity, in gpd) Existino Change Total
Drinking water treatment plant(capacity, in gpd)
Water mains (length, in miles)
8
F. If the project involves any interbasin transfer of water, which basins are involved, what is the
direction of the transfer, and is the interbasin transfer existing or proposed?
G. Does the project involve
1. new water service by a state agency to a municipality or water district? _Yes _No
2. a Watershed Protection Act variance? _Yes _No; if yes, how many acres of
alteration?
3. a non-bridged stream crossing 1,000 or less feet upstream of a public surface drinking
water supply for purpose of forest harvesting activities? _Yes _No
' H. Describe the project's other impacts (including indirect impacts)on water resources, quality,
facilities and services:
III. Consistency-- Describe the project's consistency with water conservation plans or other plans to
enhance water resources, quality, facilities and services:
WASTEWATER SECTION
1. Thresholds/Permits
' A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to wastewater(see 301 CMR
11.03(5))? _Yes X No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms:
' B. Does the project require any state permits related to wastewater? _Yes X No; if yes,
specify which permit:
C. If you answered "No"to both questions A and B, proceed to the Transportation --Traffic
Generation Section. If you answered "Yes"to either question A or question B, fill out the remainder
of the Wastewater Section below.
' 11. Impacts and Permits
A. Describe, in gallons/day, the volume and disposal of wastewater generation for existing and
proposed activities at the project site(calculate according to 310 CMR 15.00):
' Existing Change Total
Discharge to groundwater(Title 5)
Discharge to groundwater(non-Title 5)
' Discharge to outstanding resource water
Discharge to surface water
Municipal or regional wastewater facility
TOTAL
B. Is there sufficient capacity in the existing collection system to accommodate the project?
Yes _No; if no, describe where capacity will be found:
C. Is there sufficient existing capacity at the proposed wastewater disposal facility?_Yes _No;
if no, describe how capacity will be increased:
' D. Does the project site currently contain a wastewater treatment facility, sewer main, or other
wastewater disposal facility, or will the project involve construction of a new facility? _Yes
_No. If yes, describe as follows:
' 9
' Wastewater treatment plant (capacity, in gpd) Existing Change Total
Sewer mains (length, in miles)
Title 5 systems (capacity, in gpd)
E. If the project involves any interbasin transfer of wastewater,which basins are involved, what is the
direction of the transfer, and is the interbasin transfer existing or proposed?
F. Does the project involve new sewer service by an Agency of the Commonwealth to a municipality
' or sewer district? _Yes _No
G. Is there any current or proposed facility at the project site for the storage,treatment, processing,
combustion or disposal of sewage sludge, sludge ash, grit, screenings, or other sewage residual
materials? _Yes _No; if yes, what is the capacity(in tons per day):
Existing Change Total
1 Storage
Treatment, processing
Combustion
Disposal
H. Describe the project's other impacts (including indirect impacts)on wastewater generation and
treatment facilities:
' III. Consistency-- Describe measures that the proponent will take to comply with federal, state,
regional, and local plans and policies related to wastewater management:
A. If the project requires a sewer extension permit, is that extension included in a comprehensive
wastewater management plan? Yes _No; if yes, indicate the EOEA number for the plan and
describe the relationship of the project to the plan
' TRANSPORTATION -- TRAFFIC GENERATION SECTION
I. Thresholds/Permits
A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to traffic generation (see 301 CMR
11.03(6))? Yes X No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms:
' B. Does the project require any state permits related to state-controlled roadways? X Yes
No; if yes, specify which permit: Indirect Access Permit
C. If you answered "No"to both questions A and B, proceed to the Roadways and Other
Transportation Facilities Section. If you answered "Yes"to either question A or question B, fill out the
remainder of the Traffic Generation Section below.
' II. Traffic Impacts and Permits
A. Describe existing and proposed vehicular traffic generated by activities at the project site:
Existing Change Total
Number of parking spaces 44 22 66
Number of vehicle trips per day 77 598 675
ITE Land Use Code(s): 420. 931 and 814
10
B. What is the estimated average daily traffic on roadways serving the site?
Roadway Existing Change Total
1. Rte. 1A* 31.400 +/ 598 32.000+/-
2.
3.
*MHD count Salem North of Webb Street
C. Describe how the project will affect transit, pedestrian and bicycle transportation facilities and
services:
The Proposed project will require an indirect access permit from the MHD The new restaurant
1 will generate less traffic than the prior McDonalds use The site will enhance pedestrian use and
area for public viewing of the habor.
III. Consistency-- Describe measures that the proponent will take to comply with municipal, regional,
state, and federal plans and policies related to traffic, transit, pedestrian and bicycle transportation facilities
and services:
The project is in keeping with the City of Beverly's long-term efforts to enhance the area and to
promote economic development for under-used City property.
' ROADWAYS AND OTHER TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES SECTION
I. Thresholds
A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to roadways or other
transportation facilities (see 301 CMR 11.03(6))? _Yes X No; if yes, specify, in quantitative
terms:
' B. Does the project require any state permits related to roadways or other transportation
facilities? _Yes X No; if yes, specify which permit:
' C. If you answered"No"to both questions A and B, proceed to the Energy Section. If you
answered "Yes"to either question A or question B, fill out the remainder of the Roadways Section
below.
' IL Transportation Facility Impacts
A. Describe existing and proposed transportation facilities at the project site:
Existing Change Total
Length (in linear feet)of new or widened roadway
Width (in feet)of new or widened roadway
Other transportation facilities:
B. Will the project involve any
1. Alteration of bank or terrain (in linear feet)?
2. Cutting of living public shade trees (number)?
3. Elimination of stone wall (in linear feet)?
1 III. Consistency --Describe the project's consistency with other federal, state, regional, and local plans
and policies related to traffic, transit, pedestrian and bicycle transportation facilities and services, including
consistency with the applicable regional transportation plan and the Transportation Improvements Plan (TIP),
the State Bicycle Plan, and the State Pedestrian Plan:
' 11
ENERGY SECTION
' I. Thresholds I Permits
A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to energy(see 301 CMR 11.03(7))?
_Yes X No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms:
B. Does the project require any state permits related to energy? _Yes X No; if yes, specify
which permit:
' C. If you answered "No"to both questions A and B, proceed to the Air Quality Section. If you
answered "Yes"to either question A or question B,fill out the remainder of the Energy Section below.
II. Impacts and Permits
A. Describe existing and proposed energy generation and transmission facilities at the project site:
Existing Change Total
Capacity of electric generating facility(megawatts)
Length of fuel line(in miles)
Length of transmission lines (in miles)
Capacity of transmission lines (in kilovolts)
B. If the project involves construction or expansion of an electric generating facility, what are
' 1. the facility's current and proposed fuel source(s)?
2. the facilitys current and proposed cooling source(s)?
C. If the project involves construction of an electrical transmission line,will it be located on a new,
' unused, or abandoned right of way?_Yes _No; if yes, please describe:
D. Describe the project's other impacts on energy facilities and services:
' III. Consistency-- Describe the project's consistency with state, municipal, regional, and federal plans
and policies for enhancing energy facilities and services:
' AIR QUALITY SECTION
' I. Thresholds
A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to air quality(see 301 CMR
11.03(8))? _Yes X No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms:
B. Does the project require any state permits related to air quality? Yes X No; if
yes, specify which permit:
C. If you answered "No"to both questions A and B, proceed to the Solid and Hazardous Waste
Section. If you answered "Yes"to either question A or question B, fill out the remainder of the Air
Quality Section below.
12
i
' C. If the project will generate solid waste (for example, during demolition or construction), describe
alternatives considered for re-use, recycling, and disposal:
D. If the project involves demolition, do any buildings to be demolished contain asbestos?
—Yes —No
' E. Describe the project's other solid and hazardous waste impacts (including indirect impacts):
III. Consistency--Describe measures that the proponent will take to comply with the State Solid Waste
' Master Plan:
' HISTORICAL AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES SECTION
I. Thresholds/ Impacts
' A. Is any part of the project site a historic structure, or a structure within a historic district, in either
case listed in the State Register of Historic Places or the Inventory of Historic and Archaeological
Assets of the Commonwealth? _Yes X No; if yes, does the project involve the demolition of
all or any exterior part of such historic structure? —Yes _No; if yes, please describe:
' B. Is any part of the project site an archaeological site listed in the State Register of Historic Places
or the Inventory of Historic and Archaeological Assets of the Commonwealth? _Yes X No; if
' yes, does the project involve the destruction of all or any part of such archaeological site? _Yes
No; if yes, please describe:
C. If you answered "No"to all parts of both questions A and B, proceed to the Attachments and
' Certifications Sections. If you answered "Yes"to any part of either question A or question B, fill out
the remainder of the Historical and Archaeological Resources Section below.
' D. Have you consulted with the Massachusetts Historical Commission? _Yes _No; if yes,
attach correspondence
E. Describe and assess the project's other impacts, direct and indirect, on listed or inventoried
' historical and archaeological resources:
14
' II. Consistency-- Describe measures that the proponent will take to comply with federal, state,
regional, and local plans and policies related to preserving historical and archaeological resources:
' ATTACHMENTS:
1. Plan, at an appropriate scale, of existing conditions of the project site and its immediate context,
showing all known structures, roadways and parking lots, rail rights-of-way, wetlands and water bodies,
wooded areas, farmland, steep slopes, public open spaces, and major utilities.
' 2. Plan of proposed conditions upon completion of project(if construction of the project is proposed to be
phased, there should be a site plan showing conditions upon the completion of each phase).
3. Original U.S.G.S. map or good quality color copy(8-%: x 11 inches or larger) indicating the project
location and boundaries
' 4 List of all agencies and persons to whom the proponent circulated the ENF, in accordance with 301
CMR 11.16(2).
5. Other:
' CERTIFICATIONS:
1. The Public Notice of Environmental Review has been/will be published in the following newspaper(s) in
accordance with 301 CMR 11.15(1):
' Salem Evening News July 14, 2007
(Name) (Date)
' 2. This form has been circulated to Agencies and Persons in accordance with 301 CMR 11.16(2).
Date gnature of Responsible Officer Date Signature of person preparing
' or Proponent ENF(if different from above)
Joseph A. Leone Peter J. Ogren, P.E.
Name (print or type) Name(print or type)
' c/o Black Cow Restaurant Hayes Engineering, Inc.
Firm/Agency Firm/Agency
P. 0. Box 2490 603 Salem Street
Street Street
' South Hamilton, MA 01982 Wakefield, MA 01880
Municipality/State/Zip Municipality/State/Zip
N/A (781) 246-2800
Phone Phone
' 14
ENVIRONMENTAL NOTIFICATION FORM
BLACK COW RESTAURANT
1 WATER STREET
BEVERLY, MASSACHUSETTS
July 2, 2007
' CIRCULATION LIST
' * Secretary Ian A. Bowles
Executive Office of Environmental Affairs
Attn: MEPA Office
100 Cambridge Street, Suite 900 Original and 1 copy
Boston, MA 02114 plus one copy of
first three pages
' * Executive Office of Environmental Affairs
Policy Director
' Undersecretary for Policy
100 Cambridge Street, Suite 900
Boston, MA 02114 1 copy
' Department of Environmental Protection
Commissioner's Office
' One Winter Street
Boston, MA 02108 1 copy
' DEP / Northeast Regional Office
Attn: MEPA Coordinator
205B Lowell Street
' Wilmington, MA 01887 1 copy
* Executive Office of Transportation (EOT)
Attn: Environmental Reviewer
1 10 Park Plaza - Room 3510
Boston, MA 02116-3969 1 copy
' * Massachusetts Highway Department
Public/Private Development Unit
10 Park Plaza
' Boston, MA 02116 1 copy
* MHD— District 4
Attn: MEPA Coordinator
519 Appleton Street
Arlington, MA 02476 1 copy
' Circulation List
ENF—Black Cow Restaurant, Beverly, MA
' July 2, 2007
' * Massachusetts Aeronautics Commission
Attn: MEPA Coordinator
10 Park Plaza—Suite 3510
Boston, MA 02116 1 copy
* Massachusetts Historical Commission
The MA Archives Building
220 Morrissey Boulevard
' Boston, MA 02125 1 copy
* Metropolitan Area Planning Council
60 Temple Place —6'" Floor
Boston, MA 02111 1 copy
* Beverly City Council
City Hall
191 Cabot Street
' Beverly, MA 01915 1 copy
* Beverly Planning Board
City Hall
' 191 Cabot Street
Beverly, MA 01915 1 copy
' Beverly Conservation Commission
City Hall
191 Cabot Street
Beverly, MA 01915 1 copy
* Beverly Board of Health
' 90 Colon Street
Beverly, MA 01915 1 copy
* Salem City Council
City Hall
93 Washington Street
Salem, MA 01970 1 copy
Salem Planning Board
1 Salem Green
Salem, MA 01970 1 copy
* Salem Conservation Commission
' City Hall
93 Washington Street
Salem, MA 01970 1 copy
' Circulation List
ENF—Black Cow Restaurant, Beverly, MA
' July 2, 2007
' Salem Board of Health
9 North Street
' Beverly, MA 01970 1 copy
Coastal Zone Management (CZM)
' Attn: Project Review Coordinator
251 Causeway Street, Suite 800
Boston, MA 02114 1 copy
' Division of Marine Fisheries (North Shore)
Attn: Environmental Reviewer
' 30 Emerson Avenue
Gloucester, MA 01930 1 copy
' Massachusetts Water Resource Authority (MWRA)
Attn: MEPA Coordinator
100 First Avenue
' Charlestown Navy Yard
Boston, MA 02129 1 copy
M.B.T.A.
' Attn: MEPA Coordinator
10 Park Plaza—6'" Floor
Boston, MA 02116-3966 1 copy
1
Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Executive Office of Environmental Affairs
' MEPA Office
100 Cambridge St., Suite 900
Boston, MA 02114
Telephone 617-626-1020
The following should be completed and submitted to a local newspaper:
PUBLIC NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
PROJECT: Black Cow Resta ran
' LOCATION• One Water Street, Beverly, MA 01915
' PROPONENT: Joseph A. Leone
The undersigned is submitting an Environmental Notification Form ("ENF")to the
' Secretary of Environmental Affairs on or before
July 13, 2007 (date)
' This will initiate review of the above project pursuant to the Massachusetts
Environmental Policy Act("MEPA",M.G.L.c. 30,s.s. 61,62 62IT). Copies of the
ENF may be obtained from:
' William R. Bergeron, P.E. , at Hayes Engineering Inc
603 Salem Street, Wakefield, MA 01880
(781) 246-2800
' (Name, address,phone number ofproponent or proponent's agent)
Copies of the ENF are also being sent to the Conservation Commission and
' Planning Board of the City of Beverly (Municipality) where they
may be inspected.
' The Secretary of Environmental Affairs will publish notice of the ENF in the
Environmental Monitor, will receive public comments on the project for 20 days, and
will then decide, within ten days, if an environmental Impact Report is needed. A site
visit and consultation session on the project may also be scheduled. All persons wishing
to comment on the project, or to be notified of a site visit or consultation session, should
write to the Secretary of Environmental Affairs, 100 Cambridge St., Suite 900, Boston,
Massachusetts 02114, Attention: MEPA Office, referencing the above project.
By William R. Bergeron, P.E. , for Joseph A. Leone (Proponent)
i
i
HAYES 'ENGINEERING INC. 603 SALEM STREET
CIVIL ENGINEERING & WAKEFIELD, MA 01880
LAND SURVEYING (781 ) 246-2800
AFIAll
5aPAT jicoW.
bt u
• r � 4�J .meq+:
'IN G
i L7
Milfro
e
y� � Now
MINI
• p �
3r VMSFf
amp- em
�'�,�,.. ���F����i+!►�.���� i' vii.�� .,��' � � �`�t
NA
UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL
SURVEY MAP VICINITY
•
Proposed Black Cow Restaurant
#1 Water Street - Beverly, Massachusetts
,.ani•• _ �' :� � �'
rc
,) ..,;�,;;,�.i... .stir. � Gi ", 'i�a+-•- - Wim.
d � a ' a•�.. k , a
0 1 j sti'➢ 4^ a `� _
!'IMP11�
a
,{1,� syr �• F\
1 r
^� .� �) _ at}._ tax .•,� — !q '} -k_e•,--�} - N.,_t
�x.f�7 �►♦_-raga... _. ra '
Civil Engineers 603 Salem Street
Land Surveyors Hayes Engineering, Inc. Wakefield, MA 01880
Land Planners Tel: (781)246-2800
Environmental Engineers Date:June 26,2007 Fax: (781)246-7596
' CONCEPTUAL SITEPLAN
IN
BE VE" Y, MA
SCALENONE JUNE 28.2007
AA YESENGINEERING,INC 605 SALEMSTRE'ET �1
CIVIL ENGINEERS& WAKEFIELD,MASS 01980 ((�
' LANDSIIRWYORS TEL. (781)246-2800 S Y
O
BLACK MWRESTAURANT
I WA TER STREET r�
O I 1 I
I r
I �
I
O o = I
' o
0 0O
1
0 o
LOW I'll
1 _ II II
I II
II II
.aD.ENwA,TR d I I
rL 3
0 I I I
.wmvuae r n .m: �°•
ry e I I SITEUSAGETABVLATIOX
ma ,
OPEN wAiER io' I �-yyy 4166RSF. TOTALRTTEAREA
' ..'!• `q<p L'V�i I SUPPORTING SNITE
F DPA AREA F R
I AT
Wp1FA T,39R ACTUAL BUILOINO COVERAGE OP SITE
X .79—S,X44RF P
'
10,417111 4,571 S. HER USE e I AREA 5'IJ 11915. UEV LLOPMLNT
Al 9T0 5 P.ACTUAL DEVELOPMENT AREA AS SHOWN
6A PARKING RPXCES TOTAL
A
t 4 I I I 3ESEPARRMG
11 EAETURPSTAURAHIFOR30YEA
RS
PlRMANENTLY OESIGNATEDFOR DPA URE
ST VRAPEEEAR UE FLOORARGS
3.5 VE
6 SF OROVNDELOORLFI.
OR 3.31 SM RESTAUATRORANREA2,I
PATRON AREA 1,500 S.f.
997 SF VPPER LEVEL STORAGE&OFFICE)
II I R.fl845P IHEALnRFA
1